bug#68466: guile-2.0 FTBFS on powerpc-linux

2024-01-14 Thread Efraim Flashner
guile-2.0 fails to build on powerpc-linux, breaking the ability to do
any grafting.  True on commit f6afaf58b0a0b04e5023141c8f56c204f9779e19,
haven't checked backward to see when it happened.  Occurs on real
hardware and using qemu emulation.

-- 
Efraim Flashner  רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted


wgrxrdna9lyzp4h44dczzz5x74r5pq-guile-2.0.14.drv.gz
Description: application/gunzip


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


bug#68439: icewm do not install MO files.

2024-01-14 Thread Andy Tai
I remember that was left over and kept from previous patches. If they
are not rebuilt there is a bug

I will remove these lines in the next update to the next version,
unless there is objection.

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 7:08 PM Feng Shu  wrote:
>
>
> Hello:
>
> At the moment: icewm do not install MO files to
> 'share/locale//LC_MESSAGES', gmo files in tarball are removed, but
> do not re-generated, I try to add gettext-minimul to inputs, but can not
> re-generate gmo files successfully.
>
> Any reason we should remove gmo files in tarball?
>
> ```
>(add-after 'unpack 'remove-gmo-files
>  ;; gmo files are generated from .po files
>  ;; so remove them before build to make sure
>  ;; they are re-generated if needed
>  (lambda _
>(for-each delete-file
>  (find-files "po" "\\.gmo$"
> ```
>
>
> --
>





bug#66647: Installation of RPMs produced by ‘guix pack’ is super slow

2024-01-14 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi,

Simon Tournier  writes:

> Hi Inria’s folks, :-)
>
> On Sat, 02 Dec 2023 at 18:13, Maxim Cournoyer  
> wrote:
>
>> I'd rather we try it with a few more software such as 'dnf' to narrow it
>> down to just 'yum', or some other issues in our Guix-generated RPM.
>
> have you tried with ’dnf’?  Is it similarly slow as ’yum’?

I've tried it myself, and it was fast.  yum is an alias that invokes dnf
even on an old obsolete Fedora 37 VM I had available.

We could mention that other package managers than yum should be
preferred in a "@quotation Note", due to a performance problem when
handling modern RPMs as those made by Guix; or we could close this and
wait for yum to have become completely irrelevant (which seems like in a
year or so, last I checked the RHEL end-of-life dates).

Is someone volunteering to add the note?  Or should we close this?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim





bug#68384: TTY Auto-login is not compatible with elogind

2024-01-14 Thread Christian Miller via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hello,

I have the same issue.

Using the following works for me, though you need to press a button on
the keyboard.

(modify-services %desktop-services
  (delete gdm-service-type)
  (mingetty-service-type config =>
(mingetty-configuration
  (inherit config)
  (auto-login "cm")
  ;; TODO: Work around to fix "Error in service module"
  (login-pause? #t

I also created a thread in the guix-devel[0] mailing list, maybe I should
have not.

[0]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-01/msg00120.html

-- 
Christian Miller





bug#68359: Can't pull my channel because of getaddrinfo -8 error

2024-01-14 Thread ShinyZero0
Hello again.

I retried the build from codeberg and it still crashes
on any commit above e0d813eb175adb422a6993b173c6a3767957035d.
Also i pushed the repo to github
https://github.com/shinyzero0/guix-packages and it still crashes with
the same error.

Best wishes,
Paul





bug#66173: Package unknown-horizons fails during build process

2024-01-14 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Samstag, dem 13.01.2024 um 10:50 -0500 schrieb Simon South:
> Liliana, 宋文武:
> 
> Are you interested in reviewing these patches?  Unfortunately I
> neglected to CC the games team when posting them.
> 
> They fix the build of Unknown Horizons in master.
> 
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66173
> 
> -- 
I came, saw, and pushed.

Sorry for not coming earlier.





bug#68340: coreutils-mesboot-9.1 failed

2024-01-14 Thread Jing Luo via Bug reports for GNU Guix

Hello,

On 2024-01-13 20:53, Josselin Poiret wrote:

Hi Jing,

Jing Luo via Bug reports for GNU Guix  writes:

building 
/gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv...
| 'build' phasebuilder for 
`/gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv' 
failed with exit code 1
build of 
/gnu/store/9dspz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv 
failed
View build log at 
'/var/log/guix/drvs/9d/spz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv.gz'.


Can you also include the relevant failing part of
/var/log/guix/drvs/9d/spz8w4i6c9wkdskirv4rj6lmsgp54c-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv.gz?

Best,


Not sure if I got it right, but here it is:

```
[...]

phase `patch-source-shebangs' succeeded after 0.3 seconds
starting phase `configure'
source directory: 
"/tmp/guix-build-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv-0/coreutils-9.1" (relative 
from build: ".")
build directory: 
"/tmp/guix-build-coreutils-mesboot-9.1.drv-0/coreutils-9.1"
configure flags: 
("CONFIG_SHELL=/gnu/store/rb75igdc6daly1mz2ivz7rs8hd85imdz-gash-boot-0.3.0/bin/bash" 
"SHELL=/gnu/store/rb75igdc6daly1mz2ivz7rs8hd85imdz-gash-boot-0.3.0/bin/bash" 
"--prefix=/gnu/store/6waxmqaggl0h1v811y1wdmd9pdaix7yl-coreutils-mesboot-9.1" 
"--enable-fast-install" "--build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu")

configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-fast-install

[...]

checking whether snprintf returns a byte count as in C99... yes
Backtrace:
In gash/eval.scm:
 221: 19 [eval-sh ( ("as_decl_name" ( #)))]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 642: 18 [for-each #word)> # #]

In gash/eval.scm:
 222: 17 [# 
"as_decl_name" #]
 131: 16 [eval-word ( ( # #)) #:output string 
...]
 121: 15 [expand-word ( ( # #)) #:output string 
...]

In gash/shell.scm:
 289: 14 [sh:substitute-command #gash/eval.scm:129:35 ()>]

 270: 13 [%subshell #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 12 [catch quit # ...]
In ice-9/r4rs.scm:
 176: 11 [with-output-to-port #24>> ...]

In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 619: 10 [for-each # (( # #))]
In gash/shell.scm:
 344: 9 [sh:pipeline # ...]
 310: 8 [plumb # #f ...]
 270: 7 [%subshell #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 6 [catch quit # ...]
In gash/shell.scm:
 316: 5 [thunk*]
 129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "sed" "s/ *(.*//"]
  92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 616: 2 [for-each # (0 1 
2 ...)]

In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1473: 1 [dup->port # "r" 7]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]

ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 19 [catch #t # ...]
In unknown file:
   ?: 18 [apply-smob/1 #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  63: 17 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 432: 16 [eval # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 793: 15 [call-with-input-file "./configure" ...]
In gash/gash.scm:
 121: 14 [# #./configure 23>]

In gash/repl.scm:
  38: 13 [run-repl # #f]
In gash/shell.scm:
 129: 12 [sh:exec-let () "ac_fn_check_decl" ...]
In gash/environment.scm:
 215: 11 [save-variables-excursion () ...]
 292: 10 [with-arguments # #()>]
 389: 9 [call-with-return #()>]

In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 619: 8 [for-each # (( # # # ...))]
 619: 7 [for-each # (# # # # ...)]
 616: 6 [for-each # (# #)]
In gash/shell.scm:
 245: 5 [#]
 129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "printf" "%s" "checking whether  is declared... 
"]

  92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 616: 2 [for-each # (0 1 
2 ...)]

In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1473: 1 [dup->port # "r" 7]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]

ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
no
checking for stdbool.h that conforms to C99... yes
[...]
checking for uname... yes
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 157: 15 [catch #t # ...]
In unknown file:
   ?: 14 [apply-smob/1 #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  63: 13 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 432: 12 [eval # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 793: 11 [call-with-input-file "./configure" ...]
In gash/gash.scm:
 121: 10 [# #./configure 20>]

In gash/repl.scm:
  38: 9 [run-repl # #f]
In gash/shell.scm:
 441: 8 [sh:cond # #]
  55: 7 [without-errexit #]
 380: 6 [sh:or # ...]
  55: 5 [without-errexit #]
 129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "test" "" "!=" "yes"]
  92: 3 [exec-utility () ...]
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
 616: 2 [for-each # (0 1 
2 ...)]

In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1473: 1 [dup->port # "r" 7]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"]

ERROR: In procedure fdopen:
ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor
/gnu/store/pmjb23p8j2f5543k8ng5x8gw08yjb411-gash-utils-boot-0.2.0/bin/test: 
Unknown unary operator: "-lt"
/gnu/store/pmjb23p8j2f5543k8ng5x8gw08yjb411-gash-utils-boot-0.2.0/bin/test: 
Unknown unary operator: "-eq"

checking whether unlink honors trailing slashes... (cached) yes

[...]

/gnu/store/pmjb23p8j2f5543k8ng5x8gw08yjb411-gash-utils-boot-0.2.0/bin/test: 
Unknown unary operator: "-c"


[...]

phase `patch-generated-file-shebangs' succeeded after 0.3 seconds
starting phase `patch-shell-references'
phase `patch-shell-references' succeeded after 0.4 seconds
starting phase `build'
  GEN