bug#59489: bug#57292: [PATCH] WIP: gnu: propagate inputs for gdm and rework gdm-service-type.

2024-02-04 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Sonntag, dem 04.02.2024 um 08:53 + schrieb Dariqq:
> 
> On 30.01.24 06:27, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> 
> > In my opinion, adding gnome-shell and gnome-control-center to gdm-
> > configuration-gnome-shell-assets would be preferable to propagating
> > inputs.
> > 
> > WDYT?
> 
> 
> This is basically my original patch in
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57292#3.
> 
> If i understand it correctly Maxim wants gdm to take care of all of 
> dependencies providing functionality and handcrafting the environment
> with gdm-shepherd-service and gdm-configuration-gnome-shell-assets
> feels like a hacky workaround.
Yes, it seems Maxim and I have conflicting goals.  Maxim wants to avoid
"abusing" gnome-shell-assets whereas I want to avoid propagation, as it
pollutes profiles.  Perhaps Maxim and I can agree on how to interpret
gnome-shell-assets, as IIUC even with packages that aren't "pure data"
only the data portion of it ought to be relevant, no?

We should do so especially because the newly propagated variables are
anyhow propagated by gnome-desktop-service, which could constitute
weird behaviour all around.

Cheers





bug#68920: Issues with issues.guix.gnu.org (502 Bad Gateway)

2024-02-04 Thread Christina O'Donnell

Hi Felix,


You are welcome to use my Mumi clone at mumi.juix.org.

Bookmarked, thanks!

Looks like issues.guix.gnu.org is back up again.

Kind regards,
 - Christina

On 04/02/2024 05:33, Felix Lechner wrote:

Hi Christina,

On Sat, Feb 03 2024, Christina O'Donnell wrote:


connecting to https://issues.guix.gnu.org/ results in ... a 502 bad
gateway.



Kind regards
Felix






bug#68905: Boot fails when symlink exists

2024-02-04 Thread Pierre Neidhardt via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Today my Guix System crashed during the boot process for external
reasons.

Upon restart, booting a system would drop into the REPL right after the
following line:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
making '/var/...' the current system...
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

complaining that the symlink already exists.

I checked gnu/build/activation.scm (activate-current-system), and there
is this:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
  ;; Atomically make SYSTEM current.
  (let ((new (string-append %current-system ".new")))
(symlink system new)
(rename-file new %current-system)))
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

And indeed, there was a dangling /run/current-system.new file on my
disk.
After removing it (from a live USB, didn't know how to do this from the
Guile REPL), the system succeeded to boot.

The fix should be easy: ensure that (symlink system new) overwrites any
potentially existing file.

Cheers!
Pierre





bug#68853: Guix Hurd - download error

2024-02-04 Thread gusamasan via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hello, Guix.

I got a error when I was trying to download the file: 
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search/latest/image?query=spec:images+status:success+system:x86_64-linux+hurd-barebones.qcow2

The message was:
error   "Could not find the requested build product."
I hope this information will be useful for you.

Best regards.

Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

bug#53342: close 53342

2024-02-04 Thread Nicolas Graves via Bug reports for GNU Guix


Obsolete.

-- 
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves





bug#62656: close 62656

2024-02-04 Thread Nicolas Graves via Bug reports for GNU Guix


Issue fixed.

-- 
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves





bug#68853: Guix Hurd - download error

2024-02-04 Thread Jonathan Brielmaier via Bug reports for GNU Guix

In the meantime you could build the image yourself, while running the
following command in a git checkout of Guix:

```
guix system image gnu/system/images/hurd.scm
```

It shouldn't take very long and e.g. even works on my rather slow Laptop :)

~Jonathan





bug#57292: [PATCH] WIP: gnu: propagate inputs for gdm and rework gdm-service-type.

2024-02-04 Thread Dariqq



On 30.01.24 06:27, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:


In my opinion, adding gnome-shell and gnome-control-center to gdm-
configuration-gnome-shell-assets would be preferable to propagating
inputs.

WDYT?



This is basically my original patch in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57292#3.

If i understand it correctly Maxim wants gdm to take care of all of 
dependencies providing functionality and handcrafting the environment 
with gdm-shepherd-service and gdm-configuration-gnome-shell-assets feels 
like a hacky workaround.