Re: png output with transparent background
I think this is a bug in LilyPondTool, because it sends the whole "default arguments" list as one argument to lilypond. As a workaround you can try writing this to the Console window: %lilypond --png -dpixmap-format=pngalpha -dpreview %buffer Hi, When I try your workaround, I get the following error for the file test.ly warning: cannot find file: `"/path-to/test.ly"' error: failed files: "\"/path-to/test.ly\"" But everything works fine if I click the "run lilypond" button. -Jonathan The next release of LilyPondTool will fix this. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: png output with transparent background
Jonathan Wilkes wrote: --- On Sun, 4/11/10, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: From: Jonathan Wilkes Subject: Re: png output with transparent background To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org, "Wilbert Berendsen" Date: Sunday, April 11, 2010, 10:29 PM --- On Sun, 4/11/10, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: From: Wilbert Berendsen Subject: Re: png output with transparent background To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org Cc: "Jonathan Wilkes" Date: Sunday, April 11, 2010, 9:03 AM Op zondag 11 april 2010 schreef Jonathan: Feature request: when outputting to a png file, make the background transparent instead of white. (Or have an option to do this.) This can already be done with the pngalpha device of GhostScript. Call LilyPond like this: lilypond --png -dpixmap-format=pngalpha file.ly best regards, Wilbert Berendsen Thanks, Wilbert! I tried "lilypond -dhelp" to look around for an option like that but completely overlooked that one. -Jonathan Ok, when I run lilypond from the command line with the following options it works perfectly: lilypond --png -dpixmap-format=pngalpha -dpreview test.ly But when I run it from jedit using lilypondtool I get an error in the lilypond console: "unrecognized option: foo" where foo is whatever I put as the default arguments in the lilypondtool plugin options. I'm putting the following in the textbox for "default arguments": --png -dpixmap-format=pngalpha -dpreview I don't get the error if I use a single argument like "--png", or "dpreview". -Jonathan I think this is a bug in LilyPondTool, because it sends the whole "default arguments" list as one argument to lilypond. As a workaround you can try writing this to the Console window: %lilypond --png -dpixmap-format=pngalpha -dpreview %buffer ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Lilypond not working anymore
What happens if you type lilypond at the command prompt? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: CG lilybuntu link issue
So I don't need to provide hosting anymore? Can i delete this from my server? Original message From: Valentin Villenave Sent: 27 Jan 2010 15:47 -08:00 To: Graham Percival Cc: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) , John Mandereau , Lilypond bug Subject: Re: CG lilybuntu link issue On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Valentin Villenave wrote: > Sure. The iso is now available at > http://files.lilynet.net/lilybuntu.iso (And of course, I'd be happy to create a lilybuntu subdomain or a 301 redir if needed. But the 'files' subdomain will always contain a symlink to the iso, no matter what.) Cheers, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
CG lilybuntu link issue
Hi, the link to the LilyBuntu ISO (http://prodet.hu/bert/lilydev/lilybuntu.iso) is currently not working, due to a change in the server location. I think it should be better if it were instead on a subdomain in the lilypond.org domain. I'm happy to host it in the future as well, but I think we need a different address. I'm going to create a virtual host on my server, so you just need to come up with a link like http://lilybuntu.lilypond.org and http://lilybuntu.lilypond.org/lilybuntu.iso so even the download/installation instructions and my google ads could be hosted :) Thanks, Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: convert-ly can't cope with accented filename
See http://www.amk.ca/python/howto/unicode
John Mandereau wrote:
Le mardi 05 janvier 2010 à 08:03 +1100, Nick Payne a écrit :
Try to run convert-ly on a file with an accented name and I get the
following:
> convert-ly --edit "/home/nick/lilypond/Bésard_preludio.ly"
convert-ly (GNU LilyPond) 2.13.10
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/convert-ly", line 337, in ?
main ()
File "/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/convert-ly", line 331, in main
do_one_file (f)
File "/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/convert-ly", line 233, in do_one_file
ly.stderr_write (_ ("Processing `%s\'... ") % infile_name)
File
"/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/python/lilylib.py", line
59, in stderr_write
encoded_write (sys.stderr, s)
File
"/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/python/lilylib.py", line
51, in encoded_write
f.write (s.encode (f.encoding or 'utf_8'))
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 33:
ordinal not in range(128)
This is a bug, the real question for fixing it is: how to figure out the
encoding of the filesystem in Python?
Thanks for the report,
John
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Incorrect point-and-click URIs of files with non-ASCII content on Windows
Patrick McCarty wrote: On 2009-11-02, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:07:48AM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: The second case is much more likely. Graham, I don't want to bug you with this, but would you mind checking the log for mingw::lilypond to see if configure detects the mbrtowc() function? On my Linux system, the output is checking for mbrtowc... yes I have ac_cv_func_mbrtowc=yes ac_cv_search_mbrtowc='none required' and also #define HAVE_MBRTOWC 1 Dunno what that second line means. Okay, that means mbrtowc() is supported and the preprocessor macro HAVE_MBRTOWC is enabled. So my guess was wrong. :-( I plan on removing this function (due to the FIXME) and use a simpler approach instead that should not have these problems. Thanks, Patrick For me the first question is how does LC_CTYPE affect mbrtowc on Windows with UTF-8 files? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Incorrect point-and-click URIs of files with non-ASCII content on Windows
Patrick McCarty wrote: On 2009-11-01, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: 3) UTF-8 characters. In UTF-8 locales, terminals need to know about the byte offset, so I am using the character count to specify this offset. An example would be "3:11:10". The third case is arguably misleading, so maybe it should be changed to use the "3:10:10" instead. I am okay with either format. If we want to use "3:10:10" instead, then an additional parameter would be needed to calculate the byte offset. I hardly believe anyone or anything should care about byte offset. LilyPond source files contain UTF-8 characters and not bytes! If a terminal/editor doesn't support UTF-8 character streams, than the terminal/editor should be fixed. Well, in its current state, LilyPond is not using "UTF-8 character streams" for error message output and point-click URIs, so this would likely require a rewrite. Do you have any suggestions about how to implement this in C++ (portably)? -Patrick Unfortunately no. But that should not be related to the bad character offset problem. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Incorrect point-and-click URIs of files with non-ASCII content on Windows
3) UTF-8 characters. In UTF-8 locales, terminals need to know about the byte offset, so I am using the character count to specify this offset. An example would be "3:11:10". The third case is arguably misleading, so maybe it should be changed to use the "3:10:10" instead. I am okay with either format. If we want to use "3:10:10" instead, then an additional parameter would be needed to calculate the byte offset. I hardly believe anyone or anything should care about byte offset. LilyPond source files contain UTF-8 characters and not bytes! If a terminal/editor doesn't support UTF-8 character streams, than the terminal/editor should be fixed. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Rock guitar power chord symbol A5 B5 C5.. won't print via \chords { c1:5 }
Hi Albert,
this is not a bug, but a bit underdocumented feature.
If you had googled for it, you would have found the answer in
http://www.nabble.com/Defining-new-chord-modifier-td24949997.html
c:5^3
is the chord. To make it appear as C5, see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/14407
Ask usage questions on lilypond-u...@gnu.org list.
Bert
Albert Loo wrote:
I'm not top posting.
\version "2.12.0"
%% Rock guitar power chord A5 B5 C5.. symbol won't print
%% Although I do now use A3 B3 C3.. it won't print either
\chords {
c1 c1:3 c1:5 c1:7 c1:7+
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Non-guile text in music-functions-init.ly
Hi,
in the documentation string of instrumentSwitch in music-functions-init.ly
(_i "Switch instrument to @var{name}, which must be predefined with
@var{\addInstrumentDefinition}.")
The \ must be escaped: @var{\\addInstrumentDefinition}
(This breaks LilyPondTool parser.)
Thanks,
Bert
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Bug report: measure numbering after repeat with alternativeendings
If I remember well it's already been discussed: it is not a bug but a matter of
taste. I think most scores use this numbering, because this is the only way to
refer to the 16th and 17th bar unambiguously. There must not be two 16th bars.
Original message
From: Graham Percival
Sent: 25 Jun 2009 13:31 -07:00
To: Paul de Bruin
Cc:
Subject: Re: Bug report: measure numbering after repeat with alternativeendings
Please create a minimal example of this; turn on bar numbers on
every bar, and then it should be showable in 4-5 bars.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 07:37:33PM +, Paul de Bruin wrote:
> > I'm not top posting.
>
> %% BUG in Measure Numbering:
> %% after a \repeat ending in two \alternative measures, these two measures
> should bear the same number;
> %% however, Lilypond gives them subsequent numbers; the next section of the
> piece starts with a measure
> %% number one too high.
> %% Example, see line 50.
>
> \version "2.10.10"
>
> \paper{ ragged-right=##t }
>
> % JSB Sonata BWV1017
> % Sonata Cembalo+Violino
> % 1 Siciliano
>
> \header {
> title = "SONATA IV"
> subtitle = "BWV 1017"
> composer = "Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750)"
> }
>
> #(set-global-staff-size 19)
>
> SicilianoS = \relative c' {
> \key c \minor
> \time 6/8
> \clef treble
>
> \repeat volta 2 {
> \stemUp
> c16( es g c g es) c( es g c g es)
> c( f as c as f) c( e g bes as g)
> \stemDown
> as( bes c f c as) f( as c f c as)
> f b d f d b f as c f c as
> g b d f d c b d f as c, b
> c es g c g es c es g c g es
> c f as c as f d f g bes g es
> c es f as g f c es f as g f
> bes, c d f es d as' g f es d c
> bes d f bes f d es ges a c bes a
> es f ges bes d, c d f d bes f as
>
> g bes es g es bes g b d f d b
> g b c es d cd fis g a bes g
> fis g a es d c bes c d a' fis g
> c, es fis a fis es c es c a c fis
> }
> \alternative {
> { g16 d b g b d g4. } % THIS is bar 16;
> { g16 d b g b d g4. } % THIS is the alternative bar 16!
> }
> \pageBreak
> \repeat volta 2 {
> \stemDown
> g,16( b d g d b)g( b d f d b)% THIS BAR should be numbered 17;
> however, it is 18!
> g b c es c bc es g c g f
> g bes! g e des cbes c e g f e
> c e f as f c
> \stemUp f, g as c as f
> des f bes des c bes
> \stemDown a c es ges f es
> f a bes as ges fes ges f es des c
>
> des c bes a bes e f g as f c e
> f as c as f e f as f c as g
> \stemUp
> f g as d as g
> \stemDown as bes c es d c
> bes c d f d c d es f as g f
> g f es d c es as g f es d c
> g b d f d b g b d g d b
> g b c es d cg' f es d c b
> c e f as g fc' g es g c, es
> as c, f as f d b d f d b g
> \stemUp
> es' c bes! as g f es as g f es d
> c f as c as f d f g bes g es
> \stemDown
> f as des f des bg as' g f es d
> \stemUp
> c b a g f d'es, d es c' d, b'
> c2.
> }
> }
>
> SicilianoB = \relative c {
> \key c \minor
> \time 6/8
> \clef bass
>
> \repeat volta 2 {
> \stemDown
> c8( es g)bes,( es g)
> \stemUp
> as,( c f)g,( bes e)
> f,( as c)es,( as c)
> d, f as c, f as
> \stemDown
> b f' as g, d' g
> c, es g bes, es g
> \stemUp
> as, c f g, bes es
> \stemDown
> f as c es, as c
> d, f as es f g
> \stemUp
> as, d f a, c es
> \stemDown
> bes es f bes, d as'
> es g bes d, g b
> c, es g bes,! d g
> \stemUp
> a, c es g, bes es
> fis, a c d, a' d
> }
> \alternative {
> { g,4.~ g16 b d f d b }
> { g2. }
> }
>
> \repeat volta 2 {
> \stemUp
> g8 b d \stemDown g b d
> c es g g, c es
> e, g bes c, g' c
> \stemUp
> f,, as c as c f
> \stemDown
> bes, f' bes c, es a
> des, f bes c, es as
> bes, des g c, f c'
> \stemUp
> f,, as c as c f
> \stemDown
> bes, d bes' c, es as
> d, f as bes, d bes'
> es, g c f, as d
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: tarball
7-zip extracts it for sure. Jon McNamara wrote: I've downloaded the document tarball for lilly pond twice - and Winzip reports an error each time Downloaded file is apparently called lilypond-2.12.2-1.documentation.tar.bz2.tar Any suggestions as to how to use this file would be appreciated Jon McNamara ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: \lyricsto vs. \set associatedVoice
According to my understanding:
If you use lyricsto or associatedVoice you needn't (possibly must not)
add duration to syllables. Their purpose is to synchronize the
syllable's position to the notes of a voice.
Normally you use lyricsto. But there can be situations when in one
stanza the rhythm of the lyrics is not the same as in the others.
In these cases we often use something like this:
\context Voice = "soprano" { c d e
<<
\context Voice = "soprano" { f4 }
\context Voice = "soprano_var" { f8 f }
>>
}
verseI = \lyricmode { this is the first verse }
verseII = \lyricmode { this is the \set associatedVoice = "soprano_var"
se -- cond \unset associatedVoice verse }
\lyricsto "soprano" \context Lyrics \verseI
\lyricsto "soprano" \context Lyrics \verseII
As you can see we use associatedVoice to make sure that the syllables of
the second verse are assigned correctly.
This is what I remember. Though I haven't wrote a single staff for a
year now :-)
Bert
james írta:
What exactly is the difference between \lyricsto and \set
associatedVoice? The documentation isn't very explicit on this point,
and I've come to situation where I think I need to use \set
associatedVoice because the output is different from the \lyricsto
output.
The important issue here is that using \set associatedVoice it works,
and using \lyricsto it does not. I think it might be helpful to point
out at least this one difference between the two.
Also, if I try to put the two staves in the same \score block, I get a
segmentation fault.
\version "2.11.65"
instrument = \relative c' {
\context Voice = "NumberOne" { c4 }
\context Voice = "NumberTwo" { d4 }
\context Voice = "NumberOne" { e4 }
\context Voice = "NumberTwo" { f4 }
}
Text = \context Lyrics {
\lyricsto "NumberOne" { Cee }
\lyricsto "NumberTwo" { Ray }
\lyricsto "NumberOne" { Eee }
\lyricsto "NumberTwo" { Fa }
}
TextTwo = \context Lyrics \lyricmode {
\set associatedVoice = #"NumberOne" { Cee4 }
\set associatedVoice = #"NumberTwo" { Ray4 }
\set associatedVoice = #"NumberOne" { Eee4 }
\set associatedVoice = #"NumberTwo" { Fa4 }
}
\score {
<<
\new Staff \instrument
\Text
>>
}
\score {
<<
\new Staff \instrument
\TextTwo
>>
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Improvement request: Tuplet numbers and staff lines collisionav oidance (bounty)
I don't think it's a bug. Your version is not nice. Bert > --- Original Message --- > From: Chris Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org > Sent: 08/07/28/, 18:14:59 > Subject: Improvement request: Tuplet numbers and staff lines > collisionavoidance (bounty) > > As far as I can tell, there is currently no way to automatically have tuplet > numbers avoid staff lines. I've whipped up an example of the default and what > I'd like: > > http://temp.mvpsoft.com/ly/0807-TupletNumbers.ly > http://temp.mvpsoft.com/ly/0807-TupletNumbers.png > > Would anyone be willing to tackle this? I'm willing to put a bounty of €50 (or > equivalent in another currency; USD preferred) on it. Otherwise, I'm going to > have to do a lot of work to place these manually. Thanks! > > > > ___ > bug-lilypond mailing list > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > > ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
scheme bug in property-init.ly
The following declarations are bad in property-init.ly: aikenHeads = \set shapeNoteStyles = ##(do re mi fa #f la ti) acredHarpHeads = \set shapeNoteStyles = ##(fa #f la fa #f la mi) The correct is: aikenHeads = \set shapeNoteStyles = #'#(do re mi fa #f la ti) sacredHarpHeads = \set shapeNoteStyles = #'#(fa #f la fa #f la mi) Please fix it. See http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/8445975.html for the discussion Thanks, Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font caching problem?
I hope you know that in Vista you have actually 3 modes: - simple user - admin - unsafe admin, ie. system protection turned off The last one is needed for many applications, like running Winword 2003 on Vista. Bert Han-Wen Nienhuys írta: 2008/3/21, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Some facts that might have a bearing: This was a clean install of Vista, not an upgrade. This was the very first LilyPond installation on this system. I had admin priviledges during the install, although removing them later has no effect on running LilyPond. The font cache was built in [user]/.lilypond-fonts.cache-2/ and contains the usual three files. I just love microsoft operating systems My best guess at this point is that this is some kind of permission problem. * Can you see what happens if you deinstall (as admin) and install (as admin) again? * Can you see what happens if you deinstall (as admin) and install (without admin rights) again? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Path names including [space] character not accepted
It may be a bug in LilyPondTool. I hope it will be fixed in the next release (2.10.4, coming soon). Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: URL not active in the footer
I've discovered another strange thing: if move your cursor into the
upper-left corner, there is an invisible but active link (the cursor
changes to a hand and upon click it opens the URL)
Philippe Hézaine írta:
I'm not top posting.
\version "2.10.14"
\paper { }
\header {
title = "URL not active in footer"
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Barline scans
At this point, anyone who is going to bother to put in the effort and expense of getting imagesetter output will probably also have the money for Finale, Sibelius, SCORE, or similar. Lilypond just isn't in that league yet (although it is getting there). Actually I do have the money for Sibelius. The effort (time) I put into developing LilyPondTool also costs me much more than it would cost buying Sibelius. I recently was thinking about switching to it, because of the struggling with graces :-) But I like LilyPondTool, so I'll not say goodbye. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Barline scans
I think we should definitely go to a print shop and create a film with some LinoType machine in 4800dpi (it generally costs some EUR per page) and judge according to : - the various types of music (I'm quite sure that a choir with piano piece crowded with lyrics will need other line sizes than a solo violin piece), - our taste and preferences, - the consistency with other LilyPond features, - our sense of beauty. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Barline scans
Just a question, I'm curious. Does barline thickness depends on staff size? I mean the quotient between staff line thickness and barline thickness. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Regression in 2.10 - beamlets are too long in grace notes
I've found the following regression bug. I consider it to be critical,
because I could not find a workaround for it for 1 hour of searching.
The bug also happen in 2.11.2.
This doesn't happen in 2.8.6.
It is quite important for me, so I could afford 5EUR for a fix.
Bert
\version "2.10.2"
\header {
texidoc = "Beamlets are too long in grace notes"
}
\layout { ragged-right = ##t}
\relative c' \context Staff {
f1 \grace { a'8[ f16] } g1 }
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Chord names are spaced incorrectly
Chord names are not spaced according to their times. They were, however,
in 2.5.x So I think this is a regression bug.
%
% Bertalan Fodor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
\header {
texidoc = "Chord names are spaced incorrectly"
reportedin = "2.10.0"
}
\version "2.10.0" % reported in "2.10.0"
\score { <<
\new ChordNames { c2. g2. }
\new Staff {
\time 12/8
R8*12
}
>>
}
\layout { raggedright = ##t }
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Please, put back 2.10.0-1 for Windows
Dear developers, I can't see any point in having the 2.10.0-2 among the Windows downloads, if it has that serious regression. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lillypond-book error
I mean .py :-) Bert Bertalan Fodor írta: Ok, now I can see - it is only in 10.0-2, and not in 10.0-1. So the question goes to the developers: could the python scripts be named .ly in the windows distribution? Let's keep the discussion on bug-lilypond. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lillypond-book error
Ok, now I can see - it is only in 10.0-2, and not in 10.0-1. So the question goes to the developers: could the python scripts be named .ly in the windows distribution? Let's keep the discussion on bug-lilypond. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lillypond-book error
I have lilypond-book.py -- so something's wrong with your installation. Bert Dennis O'Toole írta: Graham Percival gmail.com> writes: Could you try again with lilypond 2.10.0 ? Well, I gave 2.10.0 a try, but apparently it isn't quite packaged right. Lilypond-book won't run at all -- no script is included in the distribution by that name. I figured out it was really there but named "lilypond-book" instead of "lilypond-book.py". So I renamed it and it still won't run. Looks like it calls on other modules/scripts that aren't present. Here's the message from the run after I renamed to lillypond-book.py: 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PROGRA~1\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py", line 31, in import stat ImportError: No module named stat Any advice? -Dennis- ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lillypond-book error
Well, that's very sad for me at well, because LilyPondTool depends on the .py extension. Bert Dennis O'Toole írta: Graham Percival gmail.com> writes: Could you try again with lilypond 2.10.0 ? Well, I gave 2.10.0 a try, but apparently it isn't quite packaged right. Lilypond-book won't run at all -- no script is included in the distribution by that name. I figured out it was really there but named "lilypond-book" instead of "lilypond-book.py". So I renamed it and it still won't run. Looks like it calls on other modules/scripts that aren't present. Here's the message from the run after I renamed to lillypond-book.py: 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PROGRA~1\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py", line 31, in import stat ImportError: No module named stat Any advice? -Dennis- ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: LilyPond dies silently if file starts with UTF-8 character
Isn't it an UTF-8Y file?
Bert
Mats Bengtsson írta:
Hi,
By mistake, I happened to insert a character like "é" at the top level
of a
.ly file and to my surprise, LilyPond dies silently with
GNU LilyPond 2.9.28
Processing `/tmp/a.ly'
Parsing...
and the exit code is zero. In contrast, if I add a stray ASCII
character at the top level
of a file, I get a syntax error. The same problem happens both in the
latest 2.9.x and
in 2.8.
Example:
\version "2.9.28"
é
\relative c'{
c d e f
}
/Mats
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.9.22 eps backend on Windows
Hm. Why is it not the default on Windows? Bert Vincent írta: Hi, lilypond --backend=eps -dno-gs-load-fonts -dinclude-eps-fonts myfile.ly works for me Vincent ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2.9.22 eps backend on Windows
I think it's a bug: I'm trying to use the eps backend (also by lilypond-book) and it doesn't work. I get the following error: Can't find (or can't open) font file c059013l.pfb. Can't find (or can't open) font file c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/share/ghostscript/8.50/Resource/Font/CenturySchL-Roma. Can't find (or can't open) font file CenturySchL-Roma. Detailed: Interpreting music... [c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/bin/../share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/emmentaler-20.otf][1] elapsed time: 0.03 seconds Element count 63 (spanners 7) Preprocessing graphical objects... Grob count 113[c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/bin/../share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/emmentaler-11.otf][c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/bin/../share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/emmentaler-13.otf][c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/bin/../share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/emmentaler-14.otf][c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/bin/../share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/emmentaler-16.otf][c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/bin/../share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/emmentaler-18.otf][c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/bin/../share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/emmentaler-23.otf][century_schoolbook_l_3.0673828125][century_schoolbook_l_3.865234375] Element count 78.[0] Writing proba1-systems.tex... Writing proba1-systems.texi... Layout output to `proba1-1.eps'...[c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/bin/../share/lilypond/current/ps/music-drawing-routines.ps][c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/bin/../share/lilypond/current/ps/lilyponddefs.ps] Converting to `proba1-1.pdf'... GPL Ghostscript 8.50 (2005-12-31) Copyright (C) 2005 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA. All rights reserved. This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details. Can't find (or can't open) font file c059013l.pfb. Can't find (or can't open) font file c:/Prog/LilyPond/usr/share/ghostscript/8.50/Resource/Font/CenturySchL-Roma. Can't find (or can't open) font file CenturySchL-Roma. Querying operating system for font files... Didn't find this font on the system! Substituting font NewCenturySchlbk-Roman for CenturySchL-Roma. Unable to substitute for font. Error: /invalidfont in findfont Operand stack: CenturySchL-Roma 2.19953 CenturySchL-Roma Font CenturySchL-Roma 363674 CenturySchL-Roma --nostringval-- CenturySchL-Roma NewCenturySchlbk-Roman Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- 2 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- 3 3 %oparray_pop 4 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 7 4 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- %array_continue --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 1 -1 1 --nostringval-- %for_neg_int_continue Dictionary stack: --dict:1122/1686(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:107/200(L)-- --dict:17/17(ro)(G)-- --dict:1122/1686(ro)(G)-- Current allocation mode is local Last OS error: No such file or directory Current file position is 5781 Invoking `gs -dEPSCrop -dCompatibilityLevel#1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE#pdfwrite -sOutputFile#"proba1-1.pdf" -c .setpdfwrite -f "proba1-1.eps"'...GPL Ghostscript 8.50: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 `gs -dEPSCrop -dCompatibilityLevel#1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE#pdfwrite -sOutputFile#"proba1-1.pdf" -c .setpdfwrite -f "proba1-1.eps"' failed (1) error: failed files: "D:Bertiproglilylilybookproba1.ly" ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: point-and-click broken in 2.9.18 ?still a bit in .20
Well, it should be decided by LilyPond developers if this is the intended behaviour or it is a bug. The point-and-click handling is compiled into the source of LilyPondTool, so it can not be easily parametrized. Bert Tapio Tuovila írta: Bertalan Fodor kirjoitti: May it have only changed? (I.e. the first line is numbered as 0?) Bert I think you are right. I tested adding one extra line in the beginning of the .ly file after compiling, and ta-daa! then point-and-click worked OK. So, how to fix this? Tapio ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: point-and-click broken in 2.9.18 ?still a bit in .20
May it have only changed? (I.e. the first line is numbered as 0?) Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: parallel-music - still not R5RS compliant
Hi, should I create the patch and send it? Bert original message follows We've had a conversation with Nicolas in May, summarizing: //(apply for-each (lambda (. seqs) does not work on my java-based R5RS parser Nicolas wrote: //You're right, I've been lazy, and scheme gets on my nerves sometimes. It should be (lambda* (#:rest seqs) ...), having (use-modules (ice-9 optargs)) before. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2006-05/msg00180.html Could you please apply this to music-functions-init.ly, if possible and also backport it to 2.8 Thanks, Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
parallel-music - still not R5RS compliant
We've had a conversation with Nicolas in May, summarizing: //(apply for-each (lambda (. seqs) does not work on my java-based R5RS parser Nicolas wrote: //You're right, I've been lazy, and scheme gets on my nerves sometimes. It should be (lambda* (#:rest seqs) ...), having (use-modules (ice-9 optargs)) before. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2006-05/msg00180.html Could you please apply this to music-functions-init.ly, if possible and also backport it to 2.8 Thanks, Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Regression: lyric-hyphen-retain.ly
lyric-hyphen-retain.ly - It's strange for me ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: font-family-override doesn't work in Windows
Do you mean the fonts? Yes. Actually, the override used to work before. Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Bertalan Fodor wrote: V 2.7.30 Font-family-override doesn't work: do you have (make-pango-font-tree "Times New Roman" "Nimbus Sans" "Luxi Mono" installed? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
font-family-override doesn't work in Windows
V 2.7.30
Font-family-override doesn't work:
%% Generated by lilypond-book.py
%% Options: [linewidth=160\mm,alt=[image of
music],printfilename,indent=0\mm,texidoc]
#(set! toplevel-score-handler print-score-with-defaults)
#(set! toplevel-music-handler (lambda (p m)
(print-score-with-defaults
p (scorify-music m p
#(ly:set-option (quote no-point-and-click))
#(define inside-lilypond-book #t)
#(define version-seen? #t)
%
% Start cut-&-pastable-section
%
\paper {
#(define dump-extents #t)
linewidth = 160\mm
indent = 0\mm
}
\layout {
}
%
% ly snippet:
%
\sourcefilename "font-family-override.ly"
\header {
texidoc = "The default font families for text can be
overridden with @code{make-pango-font-tree}"
}
\version "2.7.13"
\paper {
% change for other default global staff size.
myStaffSize = #20
#(define fonts
(make-pango-font-tree "Times New Roman"
"Nimbus Sans"
"Luxi Mono"
;; "Helvetica"
;; "Courier"
(/ myStaffSize 20)))
}
\relative {
c'^\markup { roman: foo \bold bla \italic bar \italic \bold baz }
c'_\markup {
\override #'(font-family . sans)
{
sans: foo \bold bla \italic bar \italic \bold baz
}
}
c'^\markup {
\override #'(font-family . typewriter)
{
mono: foo \bold bla \italic bar \italic \bold baz
}
}
}
%
% end ly snippet
%
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Ugly short ties
With raggedright, it doesn't appear.
%
%Bertalan Fodor ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
\header {
texidoc = "I get very ugly, too short ties."
reportedin = "2.7.28"
}
\version "2.7.28" % reported in "2.7.28"
\score {
\new Staff {
\relative c' {
c8 c c c c c c c | c8 c c c c c c c | c8 c c c c c c c | c16 c c
c c c c c c c c c c c c c | 8 8 r8 8~2
}
}
}
\layout {
%raggedright = ##t
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Dynamics across line breaks
It is a very serious bug, I can confirm.
Bert
Christian Hitz wrote:
Hi list,
in case a hairpin dynamic happens during a line break and ends on the
first note after the line break, it is only drawn up to the line break.
Christian
\version "2.7.28"
\score {
{c''1\> \break c''1\! }
\layout {
raggedright = ##t
}
}
\score {
{c''1\< \break c''1\! }
\layout {
raggedright = ##t
}
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Ugly short ties
I get very ugly, too short ties. How to set the minimum length (as a workaround)? However, I think this should be automatical. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: LilyPond problems with Windows
GNU LilyPond 2.6.0 warning: can't find file: 'mySong.ly' error: failed files: "mySong.ly' Known bug: you must use the whole path. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Difficult tweaks - manual example doesn't work
In v2.7 See http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.7/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Difficult-tweaks.html The example doesn't work. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2.7.7 new ties collide with dot
In some situation, ties collide with augmentation dot:
\version "2.7.7"
\score {
\new Staff {
\relative c' {
<< {
d'4. ~ d4 s4.
} \\
{
< b d,>4. ~ < b d,>4 s4.
} >>
}
}
}
\paper {
raggedright = ##t
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Embedded PostScript and java/dvi
It's normal. The dvi viewer does not interpret any postscript.
Bert
This snippet, adapted from the documentation, doesn't produce the text in
the dvi file. The ps and pdf are OK.
%%
\version "2.4.6"
\score { {
c''1_\markup { \postscript #" 4 -4 moveto /Times-Roman findfont 3.0
scalefont setfont 90 rotate (hello) show " } } }
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Tie bug in 2.6
Ok, I created a not-so-copyrighted fragment. See the problem with the
last tied chord.
The problem is closely related to the staff-space size I think, because
if I remember well, it only happened in staves that have a different
staff-space.
\version "2.6.0"
#(set-global-staff-size 16)
\include "deutsch.ly"
staffGuitarI = \new Staff {
\set Staff.fontSize = #-2
\override Staff.StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -2)
\transposition c
\key c \major
\clef treble
\relative c' {
\time 3/4 e,8[ g' h] h,[ g' c] |
\time 4/4 e,,8 g' h f'4.~ f4 |
\time 3/4 e,,8[ g' h] h,[ g' c] |
\time 4/4 e,,8 g' h f'4.~ f4 |
8
8 8 4. 4 |
8 8 8 4. c'>4 |
<< { r4. 4. 4 ~ | 1 } \\
{ 1 ~ }
>>
4. 2 r8 | 4. 2 r8 \bar
"||"
}
}
\score {
\new GrandStaff <<
\new StaffGroup <<
\staffGuitarI
>>
>>
\midi {
}
\layout {
\context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext }
}
}
\paper {
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Tie bug in 2.6
Ties get curved in wrong direction in some situations. Workaround: change y-offset to 0.4 See attached image. I couldn't make a small fragment that reproduces this. But it seems to happen quite often in smaller sizes. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Eastern European characters...
Use a UTF-8 capable editor (for example jEdit), and the latest stable release of lilypond (2.6) Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
utf-8.ly when building on cygwin
I think that when the fonts for utf-8 are missing cygwin build fails. I
think it should not fail.
See this log:
Renaming input to: `utf-8.ly'
Interpreting music... [3]
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Calculating line breaks... [3][5]
Writing header field `texidoc' to `lily-1125831446.texidoc'...
Writing header field `texidoc' to `lily-1125831446.texidoc'...
Writing lily-1125831446-systems.tex...
Writing lily-1125831446-systems.texi...
Layout output to
`lily-1125831446-1.eps'.../netrel/build/lilypond-2.6.0/share/li
lypond/2.6.0/scm/framework-ps.scm:316:9: In procedure
scm_allocate_string in exp
ression (ly:ttf->pfa file-name):
/netrel/build/lilypond-2.6.0/share/lilypond/2.6.0/scm/framework-ps.scm:316:9:
Ar
gument 1 out of range: 48156387
lilypond-book.py: warning: `lilypond' failed (status 2) (ignored)
lilypond-book.py: error: Process
/netrel/build/lilypond-2.6.0/lily/out/lilypond
--backend=eps --formats=ps,png --header=texidoc -I
/netrel/src/lilypond-2.6.0/in
put/test -dinternal-type-checking -danti-alias-factor=2 -I
/netrel/src/lilypond
-2.6.0/Documentation/user -I
/netrel/src/lilypond-2.6.0/Documentation/user -I
/netrel/build/lilypond-2.6.0/Documentation/user/out-www -I
/netrel/src/lilypond
-2.6.0/input -I /netrel/src/lilypond-2.6.0/input/regression -I
/netrel/src/lil
ypond-2.6.0/input/test -I /netrel/src/lilypond-2.6.0/input/tutorial -I
/netrel
/build/lilypond-2.6.0/mf/out -I /netrel/build/lilypond-2.6.0/mf/out
snippet-map
.ly lily-1084638653 lily-964469609 lily-9672607 lily-535874816
lily-374228481 li
ly-79128741 lily-711396926 lily-1439822179 lily-2114949871
lily-1125831446 lily-
1354065324 lily-2133679389 lily-1401925379 lily-282047444
lily-1136854159 lily-1
412464992 lily-1543518453 lily-1521353622 lily-1125740646 lily-570679247
lily-79
2782902 lily-1798116211 lily-133189907 lily-756728656 lily-2063866700
lily-90802
1564 lily-899728715 lily-1856238822 lily-722400020 lily-489976442
lily-562418937
lily-1307163500 lily-1423643786 lily-468332132 lily-1753088182
lily-1984740821
lily-738436500 lily-843705898 lily-590820286 lily-2122562766
lily-1665703484 lil
y-1820355364 lily-1930754197 lily-1387683808 lily-157705528
lily-1873883148 lily
-1247499057 lily-784049242 lily-1355129881 lily-252181630
lily-1244928163 lily-1
092966166 lily-399558878 lily-1198924295 lily-477267483 lily-1048450658
lily-196
7622382 lily-848789672 lily-384044285 lily-1607114724 lily-995163900
lily-802394
310 lily-1444932195 exited unsuccessfully.
Removing `advanced-notation.texi'
Removing `lilypond.texi'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/netrel/src/lilypond-2.6.0/scripts/lilypond-book.py", line 1616,
in ?
main ()
File "/netrel/src/lilypond-2.6.0/scripts/lilypond-book.py", line 1599,
in main
ly.exit (1)
File "/netrel/build/lilypond-2.6.0/python/out/lilylib.py", line 139,
in exit
raise _ ('Exiting (%d)...') % i
Exiting (1)...
make[3]: ***
[/netrel/build/lilypond-2.6.0/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond.t
exi] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/netrel/src/lilypond-2.6.0/Documentation/user'
make[2]: *** [WWW] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/netrel/src/lilypond-2.6.0/Documentation'
make[1]: *** [WWW] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/netrel/src/lilypond-2.6.0'
make: *** [web] Error 2
+ exit 1
+ atexit
+ :
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Programming error at calculating line breaks in ChoirStaff with more than 4 parts
Works well on 2.5.31 Win32 version. Bert If I run the following file in 2.5.32 or 2.5.31 (did not test with other versions), I get the error message calculating line breaks... programming error: adding reverse spring, setting to unit continuing, cross fingers and in the first bar there is no space between the time signature and the first note. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.5.31: Clefs as outlines, not glyphs
According to the ChangeLog, I think it's already fixed.
Bert
Erik Sandberg írta:
Hi,
Does this count as a bug?
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 00.17, Bertalan Fodor wrote:
% Smaller clefs are embedded as outlines, not font elements. Very easy
to see in Acrobat, switching "smooth outlines" off
\version "2.5.31"
melody = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
\time 4/4
a \clef bass b \clef treble c d
}
text = \lyricmode {
Aaa Bee Cee Dee
}
\score {
<<
\chords { c }
\context Voice = one {
\melody
}
\lyricsto "one" \new Lyrics \text
\layout { }
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2.5.31 barline thickness
I've printed the PDF version same score in 720dpi two times. The first time I printed the file generated by 2.2.0, then 2.5.31. The 2.5.31 barlines were thicker (IMHO too thick) in print, but they looked the same on screen when I used 1600% magnification. This happened both with Adobe Reader and Ghostscript. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2.5.31: Clefs as outlines, not glyphs
% Smaller clefs are embedded as outlines, not font elements. Very easy
to see in Acrobat, switching "smooth outlines" off
\version "2.5.31"
melody = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
\time 4/4
a \clef bass b \clef treble c d
}
text = \lyricmode {
Aaa Bee Cee Dee
}
\score {
<<
\chords { c }
\context Voice = one {
\melody
}
\lyricsto "one" \new Lyrics \text
>>
\layout { }
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.5.31 windows native, still TTF problems
can you apply the attached patch to framework-ps.scm (found somewhere inside the lilypond dir) and see if that helps? Yes, it helped. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2.5.31 windows native, still TTF problems
I've found problems again:
When I embed Times New Roman and Arial, I get a pdf file that is 3MB
long. However, when I embed the Times New Roman font that I had loaded
into fontforge and generated by fontforge as MyTimes, the pdf is only 50kB.
I can't include Garamond. Log:
warning: don't know how to embed "Garamond"="C:/WINDOWS/fonts/GARA.TTF"
With -dgs-font-load=1, all of these are right.
test file:
\version "2.5.31"
\paper {
#(define fonts
(make-pango-font-tree "Times New Roman" "Arial" "Courier New" (/ 16 20)))
}
melody = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
\time 4/4
a b c d
}
text = \lyricmode {
Aaa Bee Cee Dee
}
\score {
<<
\chords { c }
\context Voice = one {
\melody
}
\lyricsto "one" \new Lyrics \text
>>
\layout { }
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: windows version 2.5.31: point and click
If you want parameters, you'll have to specify them all in LYEDITOR. What does that mean? Like this? set LYEDITOR=myedit.bat %file(s) %line(s) Anyway, doesn't this miss from editor.scm (line 70): (re-sub "%\\(char\\)s" (format #f "~a" char) ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Custom fonts broken in Windows version
Works for me.
Bert
test.ly
=
\version "2.5.31"
\paper {
% change for other default global staff size.
myStaffSize = #20
#(define fonts
(make-pango-font-tree "Times New Roman" "Arial" "Courier New" (/
myStaffSize 20)))
}
melody = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
\time 4/4
a b c d
}
text = \lyricmode {
Aaa Bee Cee Dee
}
harmonies = \chordmode {
a2 c2
}
\score {
<<
\context ChordNames {
\harmonies
}
\context Voice = one {
\melody
}
\lyricsto "one" \new Lyrics \text
>>
\layout { }
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: windows version 2.5.31: point and click
BAT files are deprecated. Try setting LYEDITOR in your global environment settings. I've set it to myedit.bat It starts, but doesn't get the parameters. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Volta bracket begins at wrong place
I think I've found a workaround: putting the Bar_engraver into ChordNames Bert Mats Bengtsson wrote: > Known bug, see volta-bracket-chords-align.ly at > http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.5/ > > ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Volta bracket begins at wrong place
%BUG: Volta Bracket in a ChordNames context begins at wrong place.
\version "2.5.31"
staffOne = \new Staff {
\set Staff.voltaOnThisStaff = ##t
\relative c' {
\repeat "volta" 2 {
c4 c c c
}
\alternative {
{ d4 d d d }
{ e4 e e e }
}
\bar "|."
}
}
harmonies = \chords {
\set voltaOnThisStaff = ##t
\override VoltaBracket #'minimum-space = #0
c1 g c
}
\score {
<<
\harmonies
\staffOne
>>
\midi {
}
\layout {
}
}
\paper {
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Bar_engraver in Lyrics
Bar_engraver draws bar lines into the lyrics, so the lyrics-bar.ly test fails (?) http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/input/regression/out-www/collated-files.html#lyrics-bar.ly Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: problems with lilypond 2.5.29-2 (windows)
Layout output to `test.ps'...Reading 12 bytes 17 tables Reading 272 bytes TTF tool: error during read() (No error) can you run it from a terminal as follows, lilypond -dttf-verbosity=3 ParastasSedalen.ly and tell me what it says? thanks! ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Lilypond 2.5.28: Font problem with \chords under Windows 2000
Known problem. Workaround: download http://lilypond.org/mingw/lilypond-2.5.29-1.exe or the upgrade and start lilypond as 'lilypond -dgs-font-load=1' Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2.5.x for Windows PDF conversion ERROR
If I run test.ly with lilypond.bat (LILYPOND_VERBOSE=1)
{
c
}
when converting to pdf:
Converting to `test.pdf'...
Invoking `gs -dCompatibilityLevel#1.4 -sPAPERSIZE#"a4" -q -dNOPAUSE
-dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE#pdfwrite -sOutputFile#"test.pdf" -c
.setpdfwrite -f "test.ps"'...ERROR: In procedure system:
ERROR: Invalid argument
Process c:\program files\lilypond\usr\bin\lilypond.bat exited with code 1
Full LOG:
warning: argv0 relocation: argv0=C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond.exe, prefix=/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28
warning: no such directory: C:\WINDOWS/fonts;C:\WINDOWS\fonts;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\fonts;
warning: no such directory: C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/ghostscript/8.15/fonts;C:\WINDOWS\fonts;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\fonts;
warning: no such directory: C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/ghostscript/8.15/Resource;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\lib;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\Resource;
warning: no such directory: C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/ghostscript/8.15/lib;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\lib;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\Resource;
warning: no such directory: C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/gs/fonts;C:\WINDOWS\fonts;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\fonts;
warning: no such directory: C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/gs/Resource;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\lib;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\Resource;
warning: no such directory: C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/gs/lib;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\lib;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\Resource;
warning: no such directory: C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/guile/1.7;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\guile\1.7
warning: no such directory: C:/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/bin;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\bin;c:\prog\imagemagick;C:\WINDOWS\system32;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;c:\prog\utils;c:\prog\java\jdk1.5.0\bin;C:\Program
Files\Common
Files\GTK\2.0\bin;C:\Prog\ATT\Graphviz\bin;C:\Prog\ATT\Graphviz\bin\tools;C:\WINDOWS\system32\nls;C:\WINDOWS\system32\nls\ENGLISH;C:\Prog\doxygen\bin;c:\prog\php;C:\Prog\Java\jwsdp\jwsdp-shared\bin;C:\texmf\miktex\bin;W:.;Z:.;Y:.;X:.
LILYPOND_DATADIR="/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28"
LILYPONDPREFIX="C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\share\lilypond\2.5.28"
LOCALEDIR="/usr/share/locale"
Effective prefix: "C:/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28"
FONTCONFIG_FILE="C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\etc\fonts\fonts.conf"
GS_FONTPATH="C:\WINDOWS\fonts;C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\fonts;"
GS_LIB="C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\lib;C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\share\gs\Resource;"
GUILE_LOAD_PATH="C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\share\guile\1.7"
PANGO_RC_FILE="C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\etc\pango\pangorc"
PATH="C:\Program
Files\LilyPond\usr\bin;c:\prog\imagemagick;C:\WINDOWS\system32;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\Program
Files\Common
Files\GTK\2.0\bin;C:\WINDOWS\system32\nls;C:\WINDOWS\system32\nls\ENGLISH;C:\texmf\miktex\bin;W:.;Z:.;Y:.;X:."
[C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/lily-library.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/file-cache.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/define-music-types.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/output-lib.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/c++.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/chord-ignatzek-names.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/chord-entry.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/chord-generic-names.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/stencil.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/markup.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/bass-figure.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/music-functions.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/part-combiner.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/define-music-properties.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/auto-beam.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/chord-name.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/ly-from-scheme.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/define-context-properties.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/translation-functions.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/script.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/midi.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/beam.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/clef.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/slur.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/font.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.28/scm/encoding.scm][C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.5.
Re: 2.5.27 point-and-click bug (IMHO critical)
We're talking about column numbers, but how many columns does one TAB character in the source make? Eight? Why eight and not four or two? Now when lilypond finds a TAB, it assumes 8 columns and hard-codes it into the PDF. That is not correct, because all editors' TAB width can be set by users. Bert Han-Wen Nienhuys írta: Bertalan Fodor wrote: Sorry, I meant 4:2, if we the first character is indexed 1. Bert Disagree. We're talking about _column_ numbers, not character numbers. You could rightly file a related bugreport for ClickEdit.app, though, because it doesn't do tab conversion. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.5.27 point-and-click bug (IMHO critical)
Sorry, I meant 4:2, if we the first character is indexed 1. Bert c2 % BEGINS WITH TAB, reported as position 4:8 how should it be reported? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.5.27 point-and-click bug (IMHO critical)
4:1 c2 % BEGINS WITH TAB, reported as position 4:8 how should it be reported? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2.5.27 point-and-click bug (IMHO critical)
%BUG: Point-and-click positions count one TAB character as 8 SPACE
character. Because of this, editors are called with wrong horizontal
position.
\version "2.5.27"
\relative {
c2 % BEGINS WITH TAB, reported as position 4:8
d
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
\startStaff critical bug
Two bugs are documented here:
1. \startStaff fails to start ledger lines in some situations:
- when there is a linebreak in the started staff
- when stopped at the beginning of the staff
2. \stopStaff doesn't stop correctly when stopped at the beginning of
the staff
\layout { }
\version "2.5.27"
\paper {
raggedright = ##t
}
\relative \new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff {
c,8
\stopStaff d e f g a b c |
\startStaff
d c b a g f e d | c d e f g a b c |
c b a g f e d c
}
\new Staff {
\stopStaff c d e f g a b c |
\startStaff
d c b a g f e d | c d e f g a b c |
c b a g f e d c
}
\context Staff = "3" { c'1 c1 c c }
>>
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
\stopStaff problem
SYMPTOM: \stopStaff kills the barline at the end of the fragment
\layout { }
\version "2.5.27"
\paper {
raggedright = ##t
}
\relative \new StaffGroup <<
\context Staff = "3" { c1
\new Staff {
\set Staff.alignAboveContext = #"3"
c8 d e f g a b c \stopStaff }
c1 }
>>
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.5.26 Type3 instead of TrueType
OK, I've attached the PDF. As you can see, pango substitutes the good font, but does it badly. (Note that there is another problem with the header. It can't find Luxi, so substitutes Bitstream Vera, but that messes up spacing.) Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.5.26 Type3 instead of TrueType
>
> what do you mean exactly?
>
> Lily on mingw uses gs for loading the font; depending on the original
> font, the PDF will contain TTF or Type1 fonts.
>
This is true for Latin-1 characters. But yesterday I found that with
Latin-2 (and I suppose other non-Latin-1) the TrueType version of the
character is substituted with a Type3 version. Now double-checked it,
and it seems more probable now that they are not Type3 fonts, but the
outline (pure lineart) version of the characters. That makes these
characters look different from the others.
My previous attachment didn't get to the list. So I copy it. (UTF-8 email)
\version "2.5.26"
\header {
title = "latin1: ö, latin2: ő"
}
\score {
\new Staff {
\override Voice.TextScript #'font-name = #"Times New Roman"
c'^"latin1: ö, latin2: ő"
}
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2.5.26 Type3 instead of TrueType
LilyPond (or GS???) uses Type3 characters for non-latin-1 characters. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove from first sytem
%BUG: RemoveEmptyStaffContext doesn't remove staff from the first sytem
\version "2.5.26"
\score {
\relative <<
\new Staff { R1 | R1 \break R1 | R1 \break c4 d e f | g f
e d }
\new Staff { a4 b c d | e d c b | a b c d | e d c b | a4 b c d | e d
c b }
>>
\midi {
}
\layout {
\context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext }
}
}
\paper {
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Staff lives too long when there are Score events
%BUG: Temporary staves live too long when there are something happening
in the score (like a Time change or RehearsalMark):
\layout {
}
\version "2.5.26"
\paper {
raggedright = ##t
}
\relative \new StaffGroup <<
\context Staff = "3" { c1
\new Staff {
\set Staff.alignAboveContext = #"3"
c8 d e f g a b c \stopStaff | }
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #-1
\mark \markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.coda" "Coda:" }
\time 3/4
c2. }
>>
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.5.26 build error
One more: this ln-s are done directly after configure. Bert I can't build lilypond, because there are no enc files: cd /netrel/build/lilypond-2.5.26/share/lilypond/2.5.26/fonts/enc && \ ln -s ../../../../../mf/out/*.enc . ln: creating symbolic link `./*.enc' to `../../../../../mf/out/*.enc': No such file or directory make[1]: *** [/netrel/build/lilypond-2.5.26/share/lilypond/2.5.26/lilypond-force] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/netrel/src/lilypond-2.5.26' ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
2.5.26 build error
I can't build lilypond, because there are no enc files: cd /netrel/build/lilypond-2.5.26/share/lilypond/2.5.26/fonts/enc && \ ln -s ../../../../../mf/out/*.enc . ln: creating symbolic link `./*.enc' to `../../../../../mf/out/*.enc': No such file or directory make[1]: *** [/netrel/build/lilypond-2.5.26/share/lilypond/2.5.26/lilypond-force] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/netrel/src/lilypond-2.5.26' Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: slurDotted broken in 2.5.25
According to http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/input/regression/out-www/collated-files.html \slurDotted is not broken. \slurDotted c''4 ~ c''4 That's not a slur, but a tie. Didn't you mean c''4( c''4)? Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: ChoirStaff - InstrumentName problems
The solution is to do the same redefinition of the ChoirStaff as
the \RemoveEmptyStaffContext does to the Staff context. See my
recent email on the same problem for RhythmicStaffContext (Graham
did some clarifications in the manual too).
So I tried:
\context { \ChoirStaff \remove "Axis_group_engraver"
\consists "Hara_kiri_engraver" }
This gives bad result, because it don't keep the distance between
elements of the ChoirStaff, so Lyrics and Staffs get written over each
other. The same happens when I delete \remove "Axis_group_engraver"
Bert
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: ChoirStaff - InstrumentName problems
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Citerar Bertalan Fodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I've found some problems in Instrument_name_engraver that make severe
limitations on ChoirStaff (GrandStaff etc.) "instrument names".
- \RemoveEmptyStaffContext does not remove instrument name on these staves.
Of course not, since \RemoveEmptyStaffContext only redefines what
happens to an ordinary Staff, not to a ChoirStaff or whatever.
The solution is to do the same redefinition of the ChoirStaff as
the \RemoveEmptyStaffContext does to the Staff context. See my
recent email on the same problem for RhythmicStaffContext (Graham
did some clarifications in the manual too).
OK, that's fine. I'm just always thinking some OO way :-) (
- Lyrics staff gets counted for setting the position of the instrument
name in situations like this:
\new ChoirStaff << \new Staff { c c } \new Lyrics { La -- la } \new
Staff { R1 } >>
It is a problem if the empty staff is removed.
Seems more like a philosophical question on if the lyrics should
be viewed as a part of the ChoirStaff or not, but I see your point.
Actually this is an aesthetical problem :-) And if I want the lyrics to
be in the middle, I have to declare it between the the two staves, don't I?
\new ChoirStaff << \new Staff { c c } \context Lyrics = mylyrics { s1 }
\new Staff { R1 } >>
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ChoirStaff - InstrumentName problems
Hello,
I've found some problems in Instrument_name_engraver that make severe
limitations on ChoirStaff (GrandStaff etc.) "instrument names".
- \RemoveEmptyStaffContext does not remove instrument name on these staves.
- Lyrics staff gets counted for setting the position of the instrument
name in situations like this:
\new ChoirStaff << \new Staff { c c } \new Lyrics { La -- la } \new
Staff { R1 } >>
It is a problem if the empty staff is removed.
Attached example file for version 2.5.16
Bert
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ChoirStaff - InstrumentName problems
Hello,
I've found some problems in Instrument_name_engraver that make severe
limitations on ChoirStaff (GrandStaff etc.) "instrument names".
- \RemoveEmptyStaffContext does not remove instrument name on these staves.
- Lyrics staff gets counted for setting the position of the instrument
name in situations like this:
\new ChoirStaff << \new Staff { c c } \new Lyrics { La -- la } \new
Staff { R1 } >>
It is a problem if the empty staff is removed.
Attached example file for version 2.5.16
Bert
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: font size limitation ? in lilypond-book
It's a limitation of TeX. It's trying to be too clever again :-) Use the command \resizebox. Note that it will only make output in the PS or PDF file. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
bug: whole note collision
Whole notes are collides with other notes in polyphonic situations.
\version "2.4.2"
\score {
\new Staff {
\relative c'' {
<< { c1 c1 } \\ { c2 c2 b4 b4 b4 b4} >>
}
}
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.2.5 on windows 2k still not working (additional info)
In my opinion setup.exe does not misbehave. Windows users usually don't know what the difference is between a click and a double-click, and they do always double-click on every clickable thing. If they double click on lilypond, that is interpreted as two single clicks, so they get to 2.2.5-1. Perhaps we should propose cygwin setup's developers to handle double-clicks as a single click. Bert A note for the experts on the mailing list: A number of new Windows users have been hit by the same problem, namely that setup.exe suggests version 2.2.5 instead of version 2.4.x when you first run it. Can we update the information at http://lilypond.org/web/download/ in some way? Or find out why setup.exe misbehaves. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: dependancy bugs in installation
Udayan Kanade wrote: I installed lilypond 2.4 in cygwin. the following packages are required by lilypond, but it fails to tell cygwin setup about it: libintl-3 Really needed? How do you know? Libintl2 dependency is included in setup.ini Was cygintl-3.dll looked for? libiconv2 libiconv2 dependency is included in setup.ini cygkpathsea-3-3-7.dll I don't have this file, and works for me. Cygkpathsea-3.dll is in libkpathsea3 package, which is also included as dependency. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.4.2:Cygwin install
About the frozen install: I can't reproduce. Please zip and send me the setup.log.full and setup.log.postinstallX?? file from c:\cygwin\var\log, then I will able to examine the issue. About the missing images: you're right, they are installed as links not as real files. Quick workaround: copy all .png and .ly files from c:\cygwin\usr\share\doc\lilypond-2.4.2-1\Documentation\user\out-www to the lilypond subfolder. I don't know if I should fix the package, or encourage Windows users to use LilyJHelp :-) (if you would like to give it a try, you can download it from http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/lily4jedit/lilyjhelp-2.4.2-2.zip?download - after unzipping it, you can double click on LilyJHelp.jar, to start it, if you have Java (get it from http://java.sun.com)). You will get a much better experience than browsing the documentation with an internet browser. OK, I will update the cygwin package too, at some time. :-) Sorry for the inconvenience Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Possible bug
So, what will happen? I'd like to package 2.4.2 for cygwin... Should I put ec.mf into the lilypond package? Or should it be in the tetex-tiny package? You lost me here. I thought you found that ecrm1000 should not be looked for at all? I tried Bertalan's example file here and the dvips command with $KPATHSEA_DEBUG set to -1, it does not search for ecrm1000, I'd gladly fix the Cygwin tetex installation, but I want to be sure to make the right fix and not add another bug. Bertalan, what does Mats's command give you? Can you send a (comressed) log file to the list? Jan. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: RehearsalMark extent shouldn't count
Sorry for disturbing again, do you still think this is not a clear (but
maybe simple to solve) bug?
Bert
I think you've misunderstood the problem. Please try this:
\version "2.4.2"
\score { <<\new Staff {
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #-1
b8 \mark \markup {\small \bold "Why is this so ugly?"} as g16
g8.~g4 g16 g8 g16 |
c16 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c | c8 c c c c c c c
}
\new Staff {
b8 as^\markup {\bold "Why is this not?"} g16 g8.~g4 g16 g8 g16 |
c16 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c | c8 c c c c c c c
}
>>
}
Bert
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Possible bug
Because it seems that it's not installed automatically with lilypond. The question is: in what package should it be? Why do you think that this is a bug? Werner ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Possible bug
With fontencoding set to T1 (for example with \encoding "TeX" it seems
to be default) at least on cygwin ecrm1000 is looked for, despite there
is no references in the tex file created. I think this is because the
default roman font maps to it and the default font is always created, or
there are 'silent' reference to it. If ecrm1000 is looked for also in
other distribution I think this may be some kind of bug.
Move away ecrm1000.* from your TeX tree, and run lilypond --verbose:
score { c }
It will look for ecrm1000 and will create it from ecrm.mf if found.
Bert
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: RehearsalMark extent shouldn't count
I think you've misunderstood the problem. Please try this:
\version "2.4.2"
\score { <<
\new Staff {
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #-1
b8 \mark \markup {\small \bold "Why is this so ugly?"} as g16
g8.~g4 g16 g8 g16 |
c16 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c | c8 c c c c c c c
}
\new Staff {
b8 as^\markup {\bold "Why is this not?"} g16 g8.~g4 g16 g8 g16 |
c16 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c | c8 c c c c c c c
}
>>
}
Bert
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: RehearsalMark extent shouldn't count
That's a good question :-) It was the first I tried. Bert Also, why doesn't it help to set \override Score.RehearsalMark #'no-spacing-rods = ##t to make the first example behave like the second one? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
RehearsalMark extent shouldn't count
In my opinion rehearsal mark extent shouldn't cause notes' extent to
grow. It should work as in TextScript:
Bad:
\score {
b8 \mark \markup {\small \bold "Parlando"} as g16 g8.~g4 g16 g8 g16 |
c16 c c c c c c | c c c c c c c c | c c c c c c c c
}
Good:
\score {
b8^\markup {\small \bold "Parlando"} as g16 g8.~g4 g16 g8 g16 | c16 c c
c c c c | c c c c c c c c | c c c c c c c c
}
Bert
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
[doc] lilypond-internals index/Index
There is an index.html and an Index.html in lilypond-internals. Could Index.html be renamed to something else, because it fools cygwin. Thanks, Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number
With lilypond --verbose it works!
And it generates different TEX file than lilypond
ly example:
\score {
\context Staff {
c d e f
}
}
I've attached the TEX output of both. Note that changed magfont.. to
magfont for easier compare.
Bert
% Generated by LilyPond 2.4.0
% at time-stamp,FIXME
\def\lilypondpaperlinewidth{190.}%
\def\lilyponddocumentclassoptions{a4paper}%
\def\lilypondpaperinterscoreline{004.}%
\def\lilypondpaperunit{mm}%
\def\lilypondpaperoutputscale{1.75729901757299}%
\def\lilypondpaperpapersize{a4}%
\def\lilypondpaperinputencoding{latin1}%
\font\lilypondmagfontXXecrm10 scaled 1000
\def\magfontXX%
\lilypondfontencoding{T1}\lilypondmagfontXX%
\font\lilypondmagfontXXfeta20 scaled 1000
\def\magfontXX%
\lilypondmagfontXX%
\font\lilypondmagfontXXarmesan20 scaled 1000
\def\magfontXX
\lilypondmagfontXX
\def\scaletounit{ 2.83464566929134 mul }%
\ifx\lilypondstart\undefined
\input lilyponddefs
\fi
\lilypondstart
\lilypondspecial
\lilypondpostscript
\lilypondnopagebreak
\lybox{0.0}{0.0}{%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-163.0216}{\hbox{\magfontXX}Engraved by LilyPond
(version 2.4.0)}}%
\lyitem{089.6407}{-14.}{\magfontXXchar62 }%
\lyitem{068.6702}{-09.}{\embeddedps{000.0650 000.0650 005.3122 000.
000.0700 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{067.4192}{-14.5000}{\magfontXXchar62 }%
\lyitem{046.4487}{-09.}{\embeddedps{000.0650 000.0650 005.8122 000.
000.0700 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{045.1977}{-15.}{\magfontXXchar62 }%
\lyitem{024.2272}{-09.}{\embeddedps{000.0650 000.0650 006.3122 000.
000.0700 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{022.9762}{-15.5000}{\magfontXXchar62 }%
\lyitem{015.0764}{-10.}{\magfontXXchar144 }%
\lyitem{019.2764}{-09.}{\magfontXXchar150 }%
\lyitem{113.6210}{-09.}{\embeddedps{-00. 000.1900 002. 002.
000.0700 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{090.8917}{-09.}{\embeddedps{000.0650 000.0650 004.8122 000.
000.0700 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-12.}{\embeddedps{-16.9566 018.9306 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-13.}{\embeddedps{-16.9566 018.9306 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-14.}{\embeddedps{-16.9566 018.9306 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-15.}{\embeddedps{-16.9566 018.9306 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-12.}{\embeddedps{-39.1781 041.1521 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-13.}{\embeddedps{-39.1781 041.1521 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-14.}{\embeddedps{-39.1781 041.1521 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-15.}{\embeddedps{-39.1781 041.1521 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-12.}{\embeddedps{-61.3997 063.3737 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-13.}{\embeddedps{-61.3997 063.3737 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-14.}{\embeddedps{-61.3997 063.3737 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-12.}{\embeddedps{-83.6212 085.5952 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-13.}{\embeddedps{-83.6212 085.5952 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-14.}{\embeddedps{-83.6212 085.5952 000.1000 000.1000
000.2000 draw_round_box}}%
\lyitem{014.2264}{-11.}{\lyvrule{000.0500}{099.4346}{000.0500}{000.0500}}%
\lyitem{014.2264}{-10.}{\lyvrule{000.0500}{099.4346}{000.0500}{000.0500}}%
\lyitem{014.2264}{-09.}{\lyvrule{000.0500}{099.4346}{000.0500}{000.0500}}%
\lyitem{014.2264}{-08.}{\lyvrule{000.0500}{099.4346}{000.0500}{000.0500}}%
\lyitem{014.2264}{-07.}{\lyvrule{000.0500}{099.4346}{000.0500}{000.0500}}%
}%
\vfill
\lilypondend
% Generated by LilyPond 2.4.0
% at time-stamp,FIXME
\def\lilypondpaperlinewidth{190.}%
\def\lilyponddocumentclassoptions{a4paper}%
\def\lilypondpaperinterscoreline{004.}%
\def\lilypondpaperunit{mm}%
\def\lilypondpaperoutputscale{1.75729901757299}%
\def\lilypondpaperpapersize{a4}%
\def\lilypondpaperinputencoding{latin1}%
\font\lilypondmagfontXXparmesan20 scaled 1000
\def\magfontXX%
\lilypondmagfontXX%
\font\lilypondmagfontXXecrm10 scaled 1000
\def\magfontXX%
\lilypondfontencoding{T1}\lilypondmagfontXX%
\font\lilypondmagfontXXfeta20 scaled 1000
\def\magfontXX%
\lilypondmagfontXX%
\def\scaletounit{ 2.83464566929134 mul }%
\ifx\lilypondstart\undefined
\input lilyponddefs
\fi
\lilypondstart
\lilypondspecial
\lilypondpostscript
\lilypondnopagebreak
\lybox{0.0}{0.0}{%
\lyitem{005.6906}{-163.0216}{\hbox{\magfontXX}Engraved by LilyPond
(version 2.4.0)}}%
\lyitem{090.8917}{-09.}{\embeddedps{000.0650 000.0650 004.8122 000.
00
Re: TeX escapes don't work
Sure.
<>\version "2.2.5"
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
c' d' e' f'
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "" \lyrics {
\'Ar -- v\'iz -- "t\H{u}" -- "r\H{o}"
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
TeX escapes don't work
TeX escapes mess up lyrics spacing in DVI output, but there is no other
way to enter non-latin1 characters:
\version "2.4.0"
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
c' d' e' f'
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "" \lyricmode {
Ár -- víz -- tű -- rő.
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "" \lyricmode {
\'Ar -- v\'iz -- "t\H{u}" -- "r\H{o}"
}
>>
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.4.0 on cygwin - Bad fd number
Ah, sorry. The log file told the problem. It was related to accented chars in the lyrics. I fixed it, it is OK now. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
