installation of GNU radio
sir, i have been installing GNU radio on fedora. after giving the ./bootstrap and ./configure command in gnuradio-core,it works fine but as i move to make it shows the following error. checking for FFT3F...configure: error: Package requirements (fftw3f =3.0) were not met: No package 'fftw3f' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables FFTW3F_CFLAGS and FFTW3F_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg_config. So, kindly suggest me what should i do .I have already installed all prerequisites packages need before installaion of gnu radio. ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Re: installation of GNU radio
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 16:34 +0530, jaskirat singh wrote: i have been installing GNU radio on fedora. after giving the ./bootstrap and ./configure command in gnuradio-core,it works fine but as i move to make it shows the following error. Your problem is with installing GNU Radio; this mailing list is for bugs and issues with GNU make, which is a different package entirely. We unfortunately don't have any experience or help to offer for working with GNU Radio. I suggest you try a mailing list dedicated to discussion of the GNU Radio package. A quick Google turns up: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/mailinglists.html which seems likely to be helpful. Cheers, and good luck! -- --- Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.us Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional. --Mad Scientist ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors
it's the same if foo.d is not a direct target. It's even worse as make fails without ANY error message. Example2: $ cat bad2.mak all: foo.ooo COMPILE=gcc %.o: %.c $(COMPILE) -c $ %.d: %.c $(COMPILE) -c $ -MM -o $*.d -include foo.d foo.ooo: foo.o ld -o foo.ooo foo.o [/cygdrive/d/opentv/tstmake] $ make -f bad2.mak [/cygdrive/d/opentv/tstmake] $ cat makefile all: $(MAKE) -f bad2.mak [/cygdrive/d/opentv/tstmake] $ make make -f bad2.mak make: *** [all] Error 2 [/cygdrive/d/opentv/tstmake] $ cat foo.d foo.d foo.o: foo.c xxx.h See that the 'make -f bad2.mak' shows no message at all..(but going thru a makefile shows Error 2). I am sure I can find a work-around, but this seems like a nasty bug THAT SHOULD BE FIXED. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-include-filename-does-not-show-correct-dependency-errors-tp21699973p21710735.html Sent from the Gnu - Make - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:39 AM, willard pie...@willard.com wrote: it's the same if foo.d is not a direct target. It's even worse as make fails without ANY error message. Nice! xxx.h gets marked as failed and the error silenced, and the silencing applies to all paths to xxx.h and not just the foo.d-xxx.h path. See that the 'make -f bad2.mak' shows no message at all..(but going thru a makefile shows Error 2). (echo $? after running make works too) I am sure I can find a work-around, but this seems like a nasty bug THAT SHOULD BE FIXED. Whoa, no need to yell! I didn't intend to suggest that the bug should not be fixed. My don't spend time banging you head comment was for you, as a user of make, and not the developers of make (of which I am _not_ one). Hmm, since you feel strongly about this, the GNU make developers would probably find it helpful if you were to verify whether this bug still exists in the development (CVS) version of GNU make and, if so, file a bug for it or, if there already is bug for it, comment on that bug. If nothing else, that would let you be notified when the bug *is* fixed. Philip Guenther ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors
I am new to this message board... I did not intend to yell... Thanks for the info... I hope the Gnu Make developers are listening to bug-m...@gnu.org. I had a quick look at the CVS tree bug tracking (on sourceforge.net), and I didn't see anything resembling this issue... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-include-filename-does-not-show-correct-dependency-errors-tp21699973p21715450.html Sent from the Gnu - Make - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 13:27 -0800, willard wrote: I am new to this message board... I did not intend to yell... Thanks for the info... I hope the Gnu Make developers are listening to bug-m...@gnu.org. I had a quick look at the CVS tree bug tracking (on sourceforge.net), and I didn't see anything resembling this issue... ?? There's no GNU make project on sourceforge.net, at least not that I'm aware of. GNU make, like most other GNU projects and all (as far as I'm aware) FSF projects, is hosted on Savannah, which is a hosting service using free software, not SourceForge which is not free software. Try here: https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/make/ -- --- Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.us Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional. --Mad Scientist ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
