Re: [Bug-tar] Build fail on PowerPC 64
Hi, with the default configuration of GNU tar, the build fail on PowerPC 64 bit machine with: Some additional info: $ rpm -q glibc gcc glibc-2.16-28.fc18.ppc64p7 gcc-4.7.2-8.fc18.ppc64 Pavel
Re: [Bug-tar] Build fail on PowerPC 64
On 03/22/13 03:29, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Hi, with the default configuration of GNU tar How did you run 'configure'? What is the contents of config.log, and of config.h?
Re: [Bug-tar] Build fail on PowerPC 64
May I suggest that megabyte-sized text files be attached compressed: $ ls -o config.log* -rw-r--r-- 1 antonio 936144 2013-03-22 18:43 config.log -rw-r--r-- 1 antonio 41109 2013-03-22 18:43 config.log.lz It took me 5 minutes to download the message, and the mail program locked to death trying to quote the whole thing when I first tried to reply. Thanks, Antonio.
Re: [Bug-tar] Build fail on PowerPC 64
Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: May I suggest that megabyte-sized text files be attached compressed: Yes, please. $ ls -o config.log* -rw-r--r-- 1 antonio 936144 2013-03-22 18:43 config.log -rw-r--r-- 1 antonio 41109 2013-03-22 18:43 config.log.lz It took me 5 minutes to download the message, and the mail program locked to death trying to quote the whole thing when I first tried to reply. As one of the volunteer listhelpers I usually try to catch those extremely large messages in the mailman hold queue before they are sent through. Then I address it manually there by either asking the poster to re-send the message compressed or I do it myself. Although I am only one of the team and others often send large messages through anyway. Also lists.gnu.org often satuates the network bandwidth doing nothing but mailing list traffic due to large messages. With the large multiplier of the numbr of subscribers this can quickly create a huge amount of bandwidth. Except the size limit for bug-tar was disabled and so it wasn't possible to catch it there. I reinstated the typical 100K limit. Bob
Re: [Bug-tar] Build fail on PowerPC 64
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 12:56 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: May I suggest that megabyte-sized text files be attached compressed: Yes, please. Really sorry for that - I missed the size. I reinstated the typical 100K limit. Thanks a lot for this ^^^ and for all your work! Pavel