DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9450] New: - Hanging onto connections
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9450.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9450
Hanging onto connections
Summary: Hanging onto connections
Product: Apache httpd-1.3
Version: 1.3.23
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: Other
Component: core
AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not sure why, but the connections (just today) went up to 152, and nothing was
being served. Below is the debug and the strace. It seems to be looping. Not
sure what the children are doing. there is no traffic nor system load nor
active TCP/IP connections to justify that many clients.
Any thoughts?
Linux 2.2.20
---
# gdb
(gdb) attach 27492
Attaching to Pid 27492
0x401f749e in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x401f749e in ?? ()
#1 0x81a5f81 in ?? ()
#2 0x81a66ec in ?? ()
#3 0x40175d61 in ?? ()
(gdb) quit
---
# strace -p 27492
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 81}) = 0 (Timeout)
time(NULL) = 1022561298
wait4(-1, 0xbd80, WNOHANG, NULL)= 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {1, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
time(NULL) = 1022561299
wait4(-1, 0xbd80, WNOHANG, NULL)= 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {1, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
time(NULL) = 1022561300
wait4(-1, 0xbd80, WNOHANG, NULL)= 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {1, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
time(NULL) = 1022561301
wait4(-1, 0xbd80, WNOHANG, NULL)= 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {1, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
time(NULL) = 1022561302
wait4(-1, 0xbd80, WNOHANG, NULL)= 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {1, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
time(NULL) = 1022561303
wait4(-1, 0xbd80, WNOHANG, NULL)= 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {1, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
time(NULL) = 1022561304
wait4(-1, 0xbd80, WNOHANG, NULL)= 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {1, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
time(NULL) = 1022561305
wait4(-1, 0xbd80, WNOHANG, NULL)= 0
... continued ...
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9450] - Hanging onto connections
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9450. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9450 Hanging onto connections --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-28 12:18 --- Doesn't seem related to the AcceptMutex either- all available options do pretty much the same thing. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9450] - Hanging onto connections
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9450. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9450 Hanging onto connections [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-28 13:05 --- The problem was a looping bombing that seemed to be occuring within the network. Please ignore. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9457] New: - Compilation fails on HP-UX 10.20
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9457. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9457 Compilation fails on HP-UX 10.20 Summary: Compilation fails on HP-UX 10.20 Product: Apache httpd-2.0 Version: 2.0.36 Platform: HP URL: Intranet no reachable from Internet OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: Blocker Priority: Other Component: Build AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, The configure step finish successfully but make fails w/ following errors : /bin/sh /datas/depot/httpd-2.0.36/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -D_REENTRANT -I../../include -I. ./../include/arch/unix -I../../include/arch/unix -c open.c touch open.lo open.c: In function `apr_file_open': open.c:169: structure has no member named `cma_pipe' gmake[4]: *** [open.lo] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/datas/depot/httpd-2.0.36/srclib/apr/file_io/unix' The faulty line is : (*new)-pipe = 0; I use gcc version 2.95.3 on a (slow ;-D) HP 715 workstation. After some search, I discover a wraper in ./opt/dce/include/dce/cma_ux.h # define pipe cma_pipe I totaly duno why this include is called for compiling Apache ... My workaround is obviously to add such #ifdef HPUX #undef pipe #endif but I think it's quite dirty. I haven't the time yet to check on HP-UX 11. Bye Laurent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9457] - Compilation fails on HP-UX 10.20
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9457. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9457 Compilation fails on HP-UX 10.20 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-28 13:18 --- Oups, obviously, it's #ifdef __hpux__ #undef pipe #endif Laurent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9447] - Apache bringing down system
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9447. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9447 Apache bringing down system --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-28 13:53 --- Have you installed any firewall software, such as ZoneAlarm? A number of firewall vendors modify the tcp/ip drivers or insert their own broken hooks into the tcp/ip stack. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9457] - Compilation fails on HP-UX 10.20
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9457. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9457 Compilation fails on HP-UX 10.20 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-28 14:03 --- Other problem : /bin/sh /datas/depot/httpd-2.0.36/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -D_REENTRANT -I../../include -I. ./../include/arch/unix -c thread.c touch thread.lo thread.c: In function `apr_thread_create': thread.c:165: incompatible type for argument 2 of `pthread_create' thread.c: In function `apr_thread_detach': thread.c:223: incompatible type for argument 1 of `pthread_detach' thread.c: In function `apr_thread_once_init': thread.c:281: `PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT' undeclared (first use in this function) thread.c:281: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once thread.c:281: for each function it appears in.) gmake[3]: *** [thread.lo] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/datas/depot/httpd-2.0.36/srclib/apr/threadproc/unix' About error of line 165, I duno what should be the cause, as it's the right type in the source code. Perhaps onther overwriting define problem :-( - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8540] - apr_thread_mutex_pool_get segfaults at startup
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8540. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8540 apr_thread_mutex_pool_get segfaults at startup --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-28 15:53 --- Created an attachment (id=1958) All logs associated with the build(success)/launch(failure) attempt. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8540] - apr_thread_mutex_pool_get segfaults at startup
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8540. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8540 apr_thread_mutex_pool_get segfaults at startup --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-28 16:00 --- Speaking for myself, I no longer get the thread error, but I'm still not able to start httpd. When I attempt to start it (apachectl start), here is the output that appears on my screen: rtld: 0712-001 Symbol gdbm_errno was referenced from module /export/apache2B/lib/libaprutil.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol gdbm_strerror was referenced from module /export/apache2B/lib/libaprutil.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol gdbm_open was referenced from module /export/apache2B/lib/libaprutil.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol gdbm_close was referenced from module /export/apache2B/lib/libaprutil.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol gdbm_fetch was referenced from module /export/apache2B/lib/libaprutil.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol gdbm_store was referenced from module /export/apache2B/lib/libaprutil.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol gdbm_delete was referenced from module /export/apache2B/lib/libaprutil.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol gdbm_exists was referenced from module /export/apache2B/lib/libaprutil.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol gdbm_firstkey was referenced from module /export/apache2B/lib/libaprutil.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol gdbm_nextkey was referenced from module /export/apache2B/lib/libaprutil.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-002 fatal error: exiting. My lone argument to configure was the prefix flag on the first attempt. My second attempt added the --enable-maintainer_mode, which seemed to have no effect (./httpd -l and ./httpd -V produced the same output as above). My platform is AIX 4.3.3 with maintenance pack 10 (for the thread issue, I was on maintenance level 9). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9447] - Apache bringing down system
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9447. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9447 Apache bringing down system [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-28 16:30 --- See the cited report for progess to date. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7932 *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9464] New: - Error 400 when using mod_rewrite
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9464. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9464 Error 400 when using mod_rewrite Summary: Error 400 when using mod_rewrite Product: Apache httpd-2.0 Version: 2.0.36 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: mod_rewrite AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I can't get mod_rewrite to do anything but return error 400 - using the same rules which used to work perfectly on Apache 1.3.23. One such rule was : RewriteRule ^/actu/article/(.+)\.[sp]?html?$ /cgi-bin/actu.cgi?id=$ [T=application/x-httpd-cgi] ... but I get this even with any simple rule, such as RewriteRule ^/foo\.html$ /index.shtml Nothing but error 400 :( ! This is what I get in the rewrite_error.log : 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#642c38/initial] (2) init rewrite engine with requested uri /foo.html 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#642c38/initial] (3) applying pattern '^/foo.html$' to uri '/foo.html' 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#642c38/initial] (2) rewrite /foo.html - /index.shtml 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#642c38/initial] (2) local path result: /index.shtml 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#643df8/initial/redir#1] (2) init rewrite engine with requested uri /error/HTTP_BAD_REQUEST.html.var 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#643df8/initial/redir#1] (3) applying pattern '^/foo.html$' to uri '/error/HTTP_BAD_REQUEST.html.var' 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#643df8/initial/redir#1] (1) pass through /error/HTTP_BAD_REQUEST.html.var 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#64ac58/subreq] (2) init rewrite engine with requested uri /error/include/top.html 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#64ac58/subreq] (3) applying pattern '^/foo.html$' to uri '/error/include/top.html' 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#64ac58/subreq] (1) pass through /error/include/top.html 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#64ac58/subreq] (2) init rewrite engine with requested uri /error/include/bottom.html 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#64ac58/subreq] (3) applying pattern '^/foo.html$' to uri '/error/include/bottom.html' 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#64ac58/subreq] (1) pass through /error/include/bottom.html 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#64cc60/subreq] (2) init rewrite engine with requested uri /error/contact.html.var 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#64cc60/subreq] (3) applying pattern '^/foo.html$' to uri '/error/contact.html.var' 62.212.100.109 - - [28/May/2002:18:24:37 +0100] [chatelet.dyndns.org/sid#622028][rid#64cc60/subreq] (1) pass through /error/contact.html.var I was using IE 6.0 for these tests, but got exactly the same error with Mozilla 1.0RC3 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9469] - localtime not thread safe
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9469. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9469 localtime not thread safe [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-28 21:49 --- I've fixed this by apr-izing the time functions in that file. (It's better to use apr_time_exp_lt() than to proliferate localtime() vs. localtime_r() everywhere... that's the whole point of APR.) Thanks for the report! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
