DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23798] - Mention force-no-vary workaround in Content Negotiation docs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23798. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23798 Mention force-no-vary workaround in Content Negotiation docs [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 00:47 --- Thanks for the note. I've updated the content-negotiation docs. I didn't specifically blame MSIE because, although its behavior is annoying, it probably is technically correct. It will appear in the next round of doc updates. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22898] - nph scripts with two HTTP header
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22898. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22898 nph scripts with two HTTP header [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 09:44 --- sounds really like a nasty bug ;-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24227] - ReliantUNIX: Compilation problem, missing utime.h, struct utimbuf unknown
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24227. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24227 ReliantUNIX: Compilation problem, missing utime.h, struct utimbuf unknown --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 10:04 --- Thanks for the report. Can you check whether it works on ReliantUNIX if you remove the new configure check, and use just: #ifdef HAVE_UTIME #include utime.h #endif instead? (note, HAVE_UTIME not HAVE_UTIME_H) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24227] - ReliantUNIX: Compilation problem, missing utime.h, struct utimbuf unknown
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24227. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24227 ReliantUNIX: Compilation problem, missing utime.h, struct utimbuf unknown --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 10:35 --- Don't need to check: the line where the compilation error occured is within #elif defined(HAVE_UTIME) #endif so your patch would definitely work too. If there are systems knowing about struct utimbuf and utime() without including utime.h (Solaris 5.8 seems to be one) then my assumption was that some (weird?) system could exist without utime.h at all. That's the reason I made the extra configure check. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24325] New: - apr_reslist doesn't work without threads
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24325. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24325 apr_reslist doesn't work without threads Summary: apr_reslist doesn't work without threads Product: APR Version: 0.9.4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Component: APR-util AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently, the complete apr_reslist source is surrounded by an #if APR_HAS_THREADS, thus making it impossible to use resource lists whenever APR doesn't support threads (which unfortunatly includes FreeBSD). Admittedly I'm pretty unsure if this issue should be addressed in the product's source, apr_reslist or maybe even both. It's main use is surely in a threaded environment, however I guess there might be cases when a resource list could be useful in a non-threaded environment, too (although I cannot come up with an example right now). So, instead of excluding the complete apr_reslist, I'd suggest to limit the #if APR_HAS_THREADS sections to those lines that actually make use of thread locks. However, if you think this doesn't belong into apr_reslist, I'd suggest to at least place an + #else + #error apr_reslist doesn't support non-threaded environments #endif /* APR_HAS_THREADS */ at the end of apr_reslist.h. The compiler's error messages aren't very clear and even seem to vary from platform to platfrom, making it hard to find the source of a problem on a FreeBSD (i.e. no threads) machine if you only have Linux (i.e. threads) at hand. Short: Would have saved me a few hours :-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13026] - Envars set in fixup hook
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13026. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13026 Envars set in fixup hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 21:27 --- Nothing we can do here. I hope things are clear now ;-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13026] - Envars set in fixup hook
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13026. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13026 Envars set in fixup hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10775] - SCRIPT_NAME wrong value
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10775. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10775 SCRIPT_NAME wrong value [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|mod_rewrite |Core Version|2.0.46 |HEAD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7991] - Enhance ExpiresByType to accept wildcards (mod_expires)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7991. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7991 Enhance ExpiresByType to accept wildcards (mod_expires) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 21:31 --- There was change comitted into the 2.1 tree to solve your problem partially. It's proposed for backport. Marking it as fixed so far. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7991] - Enhance ExpiresByType to accept wildcards (mod_expires)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7991. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7991 Enhance ExpiresByType to accept wildcards (mod_expires) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13598] - directory listing bug with % symbol in directory or file names
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13598. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13598 directory listing bug with % symbol in directory or file names [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 22:33 --- Fixed in 2.1 and proposed for backport into the 2.0 stable branch. Thanks for your report and thanks for using Apache! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21668] - Lack of table row when SurpressIcon is enabled with HTMLTable.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21668. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21668 Lack of table row when SurpressIcon is enabled with HTMLTable. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 23:04 --- Fixed in 2.1 and proposed for backport into the 2.0 stable branch. Thanks for your report and thanks for using Apache! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21668] - Lack of table row when SurpressIcon is enabled with HTMLTable.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21668. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21668 Lack of table row when SurpressIcon is enabled with HTMLTable. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24165] - mod_access docs SetEnvIf uses regex
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24165. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24165 mod_access docs SetEnvIf uses regex [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 23:35 --- Fixed in CVS, thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24165] - mod_access docs SetEnvIf uses regex
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24165. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24165 mod_access docs SetEnvIf uses regex [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22902] - add feature RemoveOutputFilterByType
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22902. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22902 add feature RemoveOutputFilterByType [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 09:40 --- André, the sentence doesn't make any sense. Transfer-Encoding and Content-Encoding are totally independent from each other. If Mozilla refuses to process both headers, it's not HTTP/1.1 compliant. HTTP/1.1 clients *MUST* support Transfer-Encoding chunked. And I bet, if they send Accept-Encoding: gzip they should support gzip Content-Encoding as well. However, this point has not really anything to do with a RemoveOutputFilter directive - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
