DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40341] New: - Segfaults (in apr_bucket_alloc) and connection interruptions (by core_output_filter) on NetBSD with default cfg
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40341. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40341 Summary: Segfaults (in apr_bucket_alloc) and connection interruptions (by core_output_filter) on NetBSD with default cfg Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.0.58 Platform: Other OS/Version: NetBSD Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi! After upgrading to apache 2.0.59 I experience a rather weird problem. During retrieval of some files (like one generated in the example below) the connection gets terminated, leaving a log message complaining that EOF was found. Please note, that the file was gotten from /dev/zero, so it can't contain an EOF character. # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1k count=20 | hexdump -C foo.txt 20+0 records in 20+0 records out 20480 bytes transferred in 0.001 secs (2048 bytes/sec) # $ wget -O - http://localhost/foo.txt --11:00:01-- http://localhost/foo.txt = `-' Resolving localhost... 127.0.0.1, ::1 Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 386,547,056,641 (360G) [text/plain] 0% [ ] 0 --.--K/s 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 || * 5000 0% [ ] 90--.--K/s 11:00:01 (17.58 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 90. Retrying. --11:00:02-- http://localhost/foo.txt (try: 2) = `-' Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 206 Partial Content Length: 386,547,056,641 (360G), 386,547,056,551 (360G) remaining [text/plain] 0% [ ] 90--.--K/s 11:00:02 (0.00 B/s) - Connection closed at byte 90. Retrying. [Tue Aug 29 10:27:07 2006] [info] [client 15.195.185.75] (70014)End of file found: core_output_filter: writing data to the network With some other files, and all clean 7-bit files, the connection doesn't get terminated, but rather the worker crashes with a SIGSEGV. Let's see: # dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1k count=10 | uuencode kwak bleb.txt 10+0 records in 10+0 records out 10240 bytes transferred in 0.009 secs (113 bytes/sec) # $ wget -O - http://localhost/bleb.txt --11:09:07-- http://localhost/bleb.txt = `-' Resolving localhost... 127.0.0.1, ::1 Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... No data received. Retrying. --11:09:08-- http://localhost/bleb.txt (try: 2) = `-' Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:80... failed: Connection refused. Connecting to localhost|::1|:80... failed: Connection refused. Resolving localhost... 127.0.0.1, ::1 Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:80... failed: Connection refused. Connecting to localhost|::1|:80... failed: Connection refused. $ # gdb /usr/pkg/sbin/httpd GNU gdb 5.3nb1 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as i386--netbsdelf...(no debugging symbols found)... (gdb) run -X Starting program: /usr/pkg/sbin/httpd -X (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to LWP 1] 0xbbba4b31 in apr_bucket_alloc () from /usr/pkg/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 (gdb) bt #0 0xbbba4b31 in apr_bucket_alloc () from /usr/pkg/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 #1 0xbbba3546 in apr_bucket_simple_copy () from /usr/pkg/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 #2 0xbbba337b in apr_bucket_shared_copy () from /usr/pkg/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 #3 0x080dc000 in default_handler () #4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40340] - httpd as reverse proxy with SSL and IBM Lotus Domino as backend is not working right
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40340. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40340 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major Component|mod_proxy |mod_ldap Priority|P2 |P3 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 09:17 --- I try auth_ldap with a LDAP domino server 5 with a apache 2.0.59 and 2.2 I do not found a way to implement the authentication, after the bind Apache send an error [ldap_search_ext_s() for user failed][Erreur d'op\xe9ration] I try with Active Directory and it works fine. So apache cannot connect to a LDAP domino ? thanks for support -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40341] - Segfaults (in apr_bucket_alloc) and connection interruptions (by core_output_filter) on NetBSD with default cfg
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40341. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40341 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|Other |PC --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 09:38 --- UPDATE: after recompilation of both apr and apache am i no longer able to reproduce the bug -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40321] - Error in howto
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40321. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40321 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 09:44 --- Unable to reproduce the observed behaviour - so I withdraw the report. Apologies for timewasting - wish I knew what had been wrong. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40340] - httpd as reverse proxy with SSL and IBM Lotus Domino as backend is not working right
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40340. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40340 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:13 --- (In reply to comment #1) I try auth_ldap with a LDAP domino server 5 with a apache 2.0.59 and 2.2 I do not found a way to implement the authentication, after the bind Apache send an error [ldap_search_ext_s() for user failed][Erreur d'op\xe9ration] I try with Active Directory and it works fine. So apache cannot connect to a LDAP domino ? thanks for support Sorry but your remark is completly unreleated to the original problem. As it seems rather a configuration problem than a bug please discuss this on the users list (http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html#http-users). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40340] - httpd as reverse proxy with SSL and IBM Lotus Domino as backend is not working right
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40340. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40340 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 10:14 --- Please provide your reverse proxy configuration and have a look in your error file for error messages. If there are none, please set the loglevel to DEBUG and provide the results. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40345] New: - auth_ldap on apache windows failed with LDAP domino
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40345. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40345 Summary: auth_ldap on apache windows failed with LDAP domino Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.0.58 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: mod_ldap AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I try auth_ldap with a LDAP domino server 5 with a apache 2.0.59 and 2.2 I do not found a way to implement the authentication, after the bind Apache send an error [ldap_search_ext_s() for user failed][Erreur d'op\xe9ration] I try with Active Directory and it works fine. So apache cannot connect to a LDAP domino ? We check the trace with ethereal, Domino cannot understand apache request WINDOWS (it works with apache unix) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22951] - ProxyErrorOverride On sends wrong Content-length header after a 302 response
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22951. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22951 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:40 --- This is the same root-cause (though a different symptom) as bug 20183, I think. The one-liner alone doesn't quite make the two r-status checks exactly match for 2.0.x. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=102935 should be a complete fix. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40328] - [error] (35)Resource temporarily unavailable: couldn't create child process: 35
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:44 --- This looks simply like a system configuration issue, that the per-user or system process limit is being reached so fork() is failing. IIRC BSD/OS has a very low default per-user resource limit - can be tweaked by some config file or via ulimit. ulimit -a will tell you current settings in a bourne-ish sh. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40341] - Segfaults (in apr_bucket_alloc) and connection interruptions (by core_output_filter) on NetBSD with default cfg
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40341. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40341 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 12:09 --- (In reply to comment #1) UPDATE: after recompilation of both apr and apache am i no longer able to reproduce the bug Not true anymore... -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37680] - If num listening sockets drops to one on restart/graceful, httpd jams with 100% CPU
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37680. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37680 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 12:24 --- I can confirm that this bug still exists as of 2.0.59, and the patch appears to still correct the problem. I need to dynamically reconfigure Apache for a cluster solution, and this was killing me. The bug takes a different form in 2.2.3 - instead of the processes spinning in the CPU (with endless EAGAIN results to accept() calls), the child processes die (same accept() failures) and get constantly respawned. This is actually worse, because now it won't serve content. The 2.0.X issue it could still serve data. I tried the patch in 2.2.3, and it seems to work as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40328] - [error] (35)Resource temporarily unavailable: couldn't create child process: 35
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 13:45 --- ulimit -a core file size (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kbytes, -d) 1048576 file size (blocks, -f) unlimited max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 685620 max memory size (kbytes, -m) 2056856 open files (-n) 64 pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 2 stack size (kbytes, -s) 2048 cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited max user processes (-u) 64 virtual memory (kbytes, -v) 1050624 As I said httpd 2.0.59 works where 2.2.3 chokes. Which value do you suggest I tweek? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22951] - ProxyErrorOverride On sends wrong Content-length header after a 302 response
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22951. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38369] - mod_proxy keeps alive connections that should be broken
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38369. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38369 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 17:19 --- I have posted an issue to APR team which is related to this one. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40348 I would actually expect mod_proxy to keep as much as smax connections opened but it will not: under normal load situation, pool to backend web server remain at the size of the maximum used. = always closing connections would lead to poor performance For http connections, a quick workaround is to disabled keepalive connections on the backend servers: better is to configure keepalive connections with reasonable timeout. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40328] - [error] (35)Resource temporarily unavailable: couldn't create child process: 35
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 17:48 --- The -u setting: max user processes (-u) 64 is the one which needs bumping. You can do this globally via /etc/limits.conf (or similar) on a BSDy system usually. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40341] - Segfaults (in apr_bucket_alloc) and connection interruptions (by core_output_filter) on NetBSD with default cfg
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40341. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40341 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 17:53 --- This looks very broken. The 20K file is being reported as 360G in size!? Can you build 2.0.59 from the source tarball (rather than using the NetBSD pkg system), run the freshly-installed httpd using e.g.: gdb /path/to/httpd -X and reproduce it like that? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40328] - [error] (35)Resource temporarily unavailable: couldn't create child process: 35
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 21:51 --- 15984 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 332 Dec 23 2005 /etc/GeoIP.conf 16272 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav7005 Dec 30 2005 /etc/Vispan.conf 16280 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav7004 Dec 27 2005 /etc/Vispan2.conf 15991 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root clamav6201 Jul 4 2004 /etc/amavis.conf 15992 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 25757 Jul 4 2005 /etc/amavisd.conf 15995 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav9929 Apr 19 2003 /etc/blackhole.conf 15996 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root clamav 28 Aug 29 15:40 /etc/clamav.conf@ - /usr/contrib/etc/clamav.conf 15962 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav8121 Jul 9 2005 /etc/clamd.conf 15889 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 411 Sep 5 2001 /etc/dm.conf 15998 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 77 Apr 19 2003 /etc/esd.conf 16267 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav3076 Jul 9 2005 /etc/freshclam.conf 15896 -r--r--r-- 1 root clamav 118705 Jun 5 2001 /etc/ifhp.conf 15999 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 156 Apr 19 2003 /etc/imapd.conf 15897 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav2626 Nov 20 2005 /etc/inetd.conf 16003 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root clamav2125 Mar 23 2004 /etc/ipband.sample.conf* 15899 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav2425 Sep 5 2001 /etc/irs.conf 16004 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav6373 Apr 19 2003 /etc/jwhois.conf 15948 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 168 Jun 19 2005 /etc/ld.so.conf 15900 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav4492 Sep 17 2004 /etc/login.conf 15901 -r--r--r-- 1 root clamav 16542 Jun 5 2001 /etc/lpd.conf 15905 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav2014 Jun 6 2003 /etc/man.conf 16010 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 51 Apr 19 2003 /etc/manweb.conf 15911 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 777 Mar 4 2004 /etc/mtools.conf 15972 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 41561 Aug 26 14:28 /etc/named.conf 15961 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root clamav 26 Aug 29 15:40 /etc/nsswitch.conf@ - ../linux/etc/nsswitch.conf 16020 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 99 Apr 23 2003 /etc/ntp.conf 16021 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 744 Apr 25 2004 /etc/openwebmail_path.conf15952 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root clamav 19 Sep 6 2000 /etc/oss.conf 15916 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 10064 Sep 5 2001 /etc/pccard.conf 16025 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav2159 Nov 4 2005 /etc/proftpd.conf 16278 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 10630 Oct 27 2005 /etc/pure-ftpd.conf 16282 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav1448 Oct 27 2005 /etc/pureftpd-ldap.conf 16275 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav4198 Oct 28 2005 /etc/pureftpd-mysql.conf 16284 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav2891 Oct 28 2005 /etc/pureftpd-pgsql.conf 16289 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 92 May 9 14:54 /etc/rc.conf 15922 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 380 Apr 23 2003 /etc/resolv.conf 16031 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 237 Jan 25 2004 /etc/rndc.conf 16032 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root clamav 0 Aug 20 2004 /etc/smb.conf 15933 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav1661 Mar 25 17:24 /etc/syslog.conf 15974 -r--r--r-- 1 root clamav 12783 Jun 13 2003 /etc/ttys.conf 16036 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 23944 Dec 23 2005 /etc/webalizer.conf 16038 -rw-r--r-- 1 root clamav 42 Apr 19 2003 /etc/whois.conf Is all I have. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40328] - [error] (35)Resource temporarily unavailable: couldn't create child process: 35
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 21:53 --- Any suggestion for sysctl or a kernel option? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40328] - [error] (35)Resource temporarily unavailable: couldn't create child process: 35
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40328 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-30 00:23 --- As you were saying --- Additional Comment #3 From Joe Orton 2006-08-29 11:44 [reply] --- This looks simply like a system configuration issue, that the per-user or system process limit is being reached so fork() is failing. IIRC BSD/OS has a very low default per-user resource limit - can be tweaked by some config file or via ulimit. ulimit -a will tell you current settings in a bourne-ish sh. This may not be possible. This might have to be built into the programme/executable itself. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40352] New: - mod_dbd with apr_dbd_mysql fails to connect
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40352 Summary: mod_dbd with apr_dbd_mysql fails to connect Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.3-HEAD Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Other Modules AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested on Solaris 10/Sun Studio 11/AMD-64 and Slackware 10.2/gcc/Pentium 4 with MySQL 5.0.24 / Apache 2.2.3 / PHP 5.1.6 / apr_dbd_mysql.c After patching apu.h (apache configure fails to find mysql_init() in libmysqlclient_r, another bug), the makefile in apr-utils, building apache and php, creating user and database in mysql, adding the DBDriver and DBParams in httpd.conf, starting apache generates the following messages in error_log ## [Tue Aug 29 17:46:11 2006] [info] Server: Apache/2.2.3, Interface: mod_ssl/2.2.3, Library: OpenSSL/0.9.8a [Tue Aug 29 17:46:11 2006] [crit] (20014)Internal error: DBD: Can't connect to mysql [Tue Aug 29 17:46:11 2006] [crit] (20014)Internal error: DBD: failed to initialise [Tue Aug 29 17:46:11 2006] [notice] Apache/2.2.3 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8a DAV/2 PHP/5.1.6 configured -- resuming normal operations [Tue Aug 29 17:46:11 2006] [info] Server built: Aug 29 2006 17:31:16 [Tue Aug 29 17:46:11 2006] [debug] worker.c(1740): AcceptMutex: sysvsem (default: sysvsem) [Tue Aug 29 17:46:11 2006] [crit] (20014)Internal error: DBD: Can't connect to mysql [Tue Aug 29 17:46:11 2006] [crit] (20014)Internal error: DBD: failed to initialise [Tue Aug 29 17:46:11 2006] [crit] (20014)Internal error: DBD: Can't connect to mysql [Tue Aug 29 17:46:11 2006] [crit] (20014)Internal error: DBD: failed to initialise I'd be happy to email build scripts/patches/more specific messages/test results. Just email me. Googleing this problem, it seems I'm not the first to have problems with this module. Just getting it built seems to also trip up a bunch of MacOS X people. Looking through the code, there doesn't seem to be any more verbosity available at this level. I've checked the database, no problems connecting by hand. Nothing in the mysql logs about failed attempts. I've sent an email to the apr_dbd_mysql.c folks as well, hopefully someone can help figure this out. Thanks. John G. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40353] New: - mysql_init() not found in libmysqlclient_r, blocks apr_dbd_mysql
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40353. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40353 Summary: mysql_init() not found in libmysqlclient_r, blocks apr_dbd_mysql Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.3-HEAD Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, In apr-util/configure, line 38566, it checks for mysql.h, mysql/mysql.h, and mysql_init(), which fails on Linux and Solaris. Googleing for the results finds others on MacOS X, probably more. This makes it never attempt to build apr_dbd_mysql, so dbd with mysql doesn't work. patching apu.h and the Makefile post config works around the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40355] New: - Belarusian translation for Welcome page
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40355. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40355 Summary: Belarusian translation for Welcome page Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.0.58 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Belarusian translation for Welcome page -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40355] - Belarusian translation for Welcome page
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40355. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40355 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-30 05:36 --- Created an attachment (id=18767) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18767action=view) translated page -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
