Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2020/11/15]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=Critical REG=Regression MAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=NormalENH=Enhancement TRV=Trivial | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | |10747|New|Maj|2002-07-12|ftp SIZE command and 'smart' ftp servers results i| |11580|Opn|Enh|2002-08-09|generate Content-Location headers | |12033|Opn|Nor|2002-08-26|Graceful restart immediately result in [warn] long| |13661|Ass|Enh|2002-10-15|Apache cannot not handle dynamic IP reallocation | |14104|Opn|Enh|2002-10-30|not documented: must restart server to load new CR| |16811|Ass|Maj|2003-02-05|mod_autoindex always return webpages in UTF-8.| |17244|Ass|Nor|2003-02-20|./configure --help gives false information regardi| |17497|Opn|Nor|2003-02-27|mod_mime_magic generates incorrect response header| |20036|Ass|Nor|2003-05-19|Trailing Dots stripped from PATH_INFO environment | |21260|Opn|Nor|2003-07-02|CacheMaxExpire directive not enforced ! | |21533|Ass|Cri|2003-07-11|Multiple levels of htacces files can cause mod_aut| |22484|Opn|Maj|2003-08-16|semaphore problem takes httpd down| |22686|Opn|Nor|2003-08-25|ab: apr_poll: The timeout specified has expired (7| |22898|Opn|Nor|2003-09-02|nph scripts with two HTTP header | |23911|Opn|Cri|2003-10-18|CGI processes left defunct/zombie under 2.0.54| |24095|Opn|Cri|2003-10-24|ERROR "Parent: child process exited with status 32| |24437|Opn|Nor|2003-11-05|mod_auth_ldap doubly-escapes backslash (\) charact| |24890|Opn|Nor|2003-11-21|Apache config parser should not be local aware ( g| |25469|Opn|Enh|2003-12-12|create AuthRoot for defining paths to auth files | |25484|Ass|Nor|2003-12-12|Non-service Apache cannot be stopped in WinXP | |26153|Opn|Cri|2004-01-15|Apache cygwin directory traversal vulnerability | |27257|Ass|Enh|2004-02-26|rotatelogs with getopt and setuid | |27715|Ass|Enh|2004-03-16|Client sending misformed Range "bytes = 0-100" ins| |29090|Ass|Enh|2004-05-19|MultiviewsMatch NegotiatedOnly extensions not resp| |29510|Ass|Enh|2004-06-10|ab does not support multiple cookies | |29644|Ver|Nor|2004-06-17|mod_proxy keeps downloading even after the client | |30259|Ass|Enh|2004-07-22|When proxy connects to backend, a DNS lookup is do| |30505|Ass|Enh|2004-08-05|Apache uses 'Error', and not lower level event typ| |31302|Opn|Cri|2004-09-19|suexec doesn't execute commands if they're not in | |31352|Ass|Enh|2004-09-21|RFE, Bind to LDAP server with browser supplier use| |31418|Opn|Nor|2004-09-25|SSLUserName is not usable by other modules| |32328|Opn|Enh|2004-11-19|Make mod_rewrite escaping optional / expose intern| |32750|Ass|Maj|2004-12-17|mod_proxy + Win32DisableAcceptEx = memory leak| |33089|New|Nor|2005-01-13|mod_include: Options +Includes (or IncludesNoExec)| |34270|Inf|Nor|2005-04-01|Large POSTs over SSL from Internet Explorer do not| |34519|New|Enh|2005-04-19|Directory index should emit valid XHTML | |35098|Ver|Maj|2005-05-27|Install fails using --prefix | |35652|Opn|Min|2005-07-07|Improve error message: "pcfg_openfile: unable to c| |35768|Ver|Nor|2005-07-17|Missing file logs at far too high of log level| |36636|Opn|Maj|2005-09-13|database write lock taken for PROPFIND operations | |36676|New|Nor|2005-09-15|time() bug in httpd/os/win32/util_win32.c:wait_for| |36710|Opn|Blk|2005-09-19|CGI output not captured | |37290|Opn|Min|2005-10-28|DirectoryIndex don't work in scriptaliased directo| |37564|New|Enh|2005-11-19|Suggestion: mod_suexec SuexecUserGroup directive i| |38325|Opn|Nor|2006-01-20|impossible to determine AUTH_TYPE of interpreted r| |38571|New|Enh|2006-02-08|CustomLog directive checked by apachectl configtes| |38995|New|Nor|2006-03-16|httpd tries to communicate with the CGI daemon eve| |39275|Opn|Nor|2006-04-11|slow child_init causes MaxClients warning | |39287|New|Nor|2006-04-12|Incorrect If-Modified-Since validation (due to syn| |39727|Ass|Nor|2006-06-05|Incorrect ETag on gzip:ed content | |39748|New|Enh|2006-06-07|Header and POST support for mod_include |
[Bug 64925] New: Set LimitRequestFields = 0 fail the test
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64925 Bug ID: 64925 Summary: Set LimitRequestFields = 0 fail the test Product: Apache httpd-test Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: framework Assignee: bugs@httpd.apache.org Reporter: jirauser1...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hi, I'm working on testing software and its configuration. I'm using mod_perl-2.0.10 (I think it is the official one) to test httpd-2.4.37. I wrongly-set LimitRequestFields to a string and the test (server_rec.t) failed. When I check the source code I found that the value is changed to 0 by using atoi(). And from the doc (I also checked the source code and conformed this): "Number is an integer from 0 (meaning unlimited) to 32767. 0 means disable the limit." Then I tried value 0, 1 and 100. Both 0 and 1 failed the test and 100 passed. I understand the value 1 is too small for a normal client request might include and there is clear log in logs/error_log: "AH00563: Number of request headers exceeds LimitRequestFields." However, I didn't find any informative logs when I set LimitRequestFields to 0 to show why the test fails, and I believe LimitRequestFields = 0 is a valid value (no limit) although it may lead to security issues. Could you please help me check the source code and test code to see what's the problem here, thanks a lot! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org
[Bug 57691] mod_proxy/proxy_util confuses UDS scheme with HTTP scheme when using RewriteRule
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57691 Christophe JAILLET changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||PatchAvailable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org
[Bug 53149] mod_ldap should/could use mod_socache
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53149 --- Comment #2 from Christophe JAILLET --- Hi, feel free to look at it and propose patches. Contribution are always welcomed! Bugzilla is not always the best tool for communication. Should you need to exchange, ask for advice, explanation or whatever, our mailing list d...@httpd.apache.org may be more appropriate. Please also not that some of our developers can be contacted via IRC, depending of their availability. All details on: https://httpd.apache.org/support.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org
