DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10089] - mod_negotiation.so in 1.3.26 fails when compiled with largefile (64-bit) CFLAGS

2003-02-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10089.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10089

mod_negotiation.so in 1.3.26 fails when compiled with largefile (64-bit) CFLAGS

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10089] - mod_negotiation.so in 1.3.26 fails when compiled with largefile (64-bit) CFLAGS

2002-06-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10089.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10089

mod_negotiation.so in 1.3.26 fails when compiled with largefile (64-bit) CFLAGS





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-06-20 21:44 ---
This is a common problem with certain levels of gcc on AIX and
Solaris.  The gcc-generated code  in DSOs sometimes reference
functions in libgcc.a.  There may be ways to get libgcc.a included in
DSOs.  Alternatively, consider building mod_negotiation 
statically.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]