Re: RFR: 8277944: JDK 18 - update GA Release Date

2021-11-29 Thread Sean Coffey
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:19:12 GMT, Pavel Kharskii  wrote:

> 8277944: JDK 18 - update GA Release Date

Marked as reviewed by coffeys (Reviewer).

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6596


Re: RFR: 8275766: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2021e

2021-11-02 Thread Sean Coffey
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:02:27 GMT, Yoshiki Sato  wrote:

> Please review the integration of tzdata2021e (including tzdata2021d) to the 
> JDK.
> The fix has passed all relevant JTREG regression tests and JCK tests. 
> 
> 8275754: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2021d
> 8275849: TestZoneInfo310.java fails with tzdata2021e

Marked as reviewed by coffeys (Reviewer).

I think you've enough Reviewers already but yes, this looks fine.

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6144


Re: RFR: 8274407: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2021c

2021-10-06 Thread Sean Coffey
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:24:49 GMT, Naoto Sato  wrote:

> This PR is to upgrade the time zone data in the JDK to IANA's tzdata2021c 
> level. Note that the tz data is "as is", as released by IANA. No `merged 
> links` are retracted.
> The PR also fixes two issues along with the 2021c upgrade.

Marked as reviewed by coffeys (Reviewer).

pre-1970 data for some time zones is lost or becomes inaccurate with this 
tzdata release. Do we plan to release-note that point  ?

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5832


Re: RFR: 8254177: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020b

2020-10-13 Thread Sean Coffey
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:32:38 GMT, Kiran Sidhartha Ravikumar 
 wrote:

> Hi Guys,
> 
> Please review the patch for tzdata2020b integration into JDK.
> 
> Release details can be found here:
> 
> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2020-October/59.html
> 
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254177
> 
> I had the pacificnew, systemv files removed from JDK repo and so TimeZoneName 
> classes, make file and few test files
> need to be updated to incorporate the change.
> The patch has passed all the related testing including JCK.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kiran

Looks good. I think we should release-note the removal of the "US/Pacific-New" 
Link on the off chance that some
production/testing system is looking for such a zone.

-

Marked as reviewed by coffeys (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/602