Remove maven-site-plugin:attach-descriptor from ASF Maven parent 42

2024-04-09 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Hi,

I'm going to remove the goal maven-site-plugin:attach-descriptor from ASF
Maven parent 42,

It can cause problems with your project build if you need to deploy a site
descriptor.
In such cases you need to add it in your project after upgrading to ASF
parent 42.

Please look at MPOM-480 [1] issue for details.

If someone will need an assist let me know.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-480

-- 
Sławomir Jaranowski


Re: ASF Maven parent pom and use properties to define the versions of plugins

2023-06-09 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Hi

Currently we have two propositions:

1. Versions - like mavenCleanPluginVersion [1]
2. version. - like version.maven-clean-plugin [2]

As I see from comments on PR more people is for option 2


[1] https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/pull/155
[2] https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/pull/158




wt., 6 cze 2023 o 00:28 Slawomir Jaranowski 
napisał(a):

> Hi,
>
> I want to introduce properties to define versions of plugins.
> I have prepared PR [1] and we have a discussion about properties schema
> for such purposes.
>
> Because AFS Maven parent is used by other ASF projects, and such changes
> can be difficult to change in the next release, I want to know other
> opinions.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/pull/155
>
>
> --
> Sławomir Jaranowski
>


-- 
Sławomir Jaranowski


ASF Maven parent pom and use properties to define the versions of plugins

2023-06-05 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Hi,

I want to introduce properties to define versions of plugins.
I have prepared PR [1] and we have a discussion about properties schema for
such purposes.

Because AFS Maven parent is used by other ASF projects, and such changes
can be difficult to change in the next release, I want to know other
opinions.

[1] https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/pull/155


-- 
Sławomir Jaranowski


Re: Broken Builds because of gradle-enterprise

2022-12-09 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
pt., 9 gru 2022 o 15:48 Greg Stein  napisał(a):

> On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 5:41 AM Olivier Lamy  wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > Are we seriously activating this gradle enterprise to every build and
> > so breaks a few builds without any notice?
> >
>
> Apologies. We thought it would simply be an additional output, and would
> not affect any builds. Gaven has turned it off, and we'll do some more
> testing to find out why this happened.
>
> >...
>
> > [INFO] Publishing build scan...
> > [INFO] https://ge.apache.org/s/mabitou3lbw2y
> >
> > we (Apache Maven) don’t want to use this
>
>
> I see no discussion on dev@maven or private@maven to suggest the PMC does
> not want this tool, once we get it debugged.
>
>
There is no discussion on dev@maven, private@maven ... for a simple reason
- nobody from the Maven team knows that you want to introduce such features.

Please start a topic about it on Maven list with a description of what you
want to introduce, why, what will be to do before change.

Some of us were surprised due to the failed build.

Regards,
> Greg Stein
> Infrastructure Administrator, ASF
>


-- 
Sławomir Jaranowski


Re: GitHub Actions runners

2022-08-16 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Thanks Richard,

Mentioned page contains data which is one year old ...
Can anyone update it? How does it look today?

wt., 16 sie 2022 o 16:36 Zowalla, Richard 
napisał(a):

> Hi,
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BUILDS/GitHub+Actions+status
>
> contains some performance details + background infos.
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
> ________
> Von: Slawomir Jaranowski 
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. August 2022 15:56:44
> An: builds@apache.org
> Betreff: GitHub Actions runners
>
> Hi,
>
> Do we monitoring usage of GitHub action runners?
> How many projects use GitHub actions?
> How runners are utilized by each ASF project?
>
> Last time I see that Maven builds spent more time waiting for free runners
> and builds took about 1 hour instead of a couple of minutes.
>
> Eg on https://github.com/apache/maven-remote-resources-plugin/actions
>
> Each job takes about 2 - 4 minutes but to complete the whole workflow we
> need about 1 hour.
>
> If more projects will use GitHub actions it can be a problem.
>
>
> --
> Sławomir Jaranowski
>


-- 
Sławomir Jaranowski


GitHub Actions runners

2022-08-16 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Hi,

Do we monitoring usage of GitHub action runners?
How many projects use GitHub actions?
How runners are utilized by each ASF project?

Last time I see that Maven builds spent more time waiting for free runners
and builds took about 1 hour instead of a couple of minutes.

Eg on https://github.com/apache/maven-remote-resources-plugin/actions

Each job takes about 2 - 4 minutes but to complete the whole workflow we
need about 1 hour.

If more projects will use GitHub actions it can be a problem.


-- 
Sławomir Jaranowski