Re: mailutil transfer and bad messages
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Cliff Green wrote: Just a note - that's okay for an mbox-format folder, mbx folders are a different story; you'll probably need to copy those messages to an mbox folder, remove the extra header, then move them back to the mbx folder. What's OK for an mbox format mailbox is also OK for mbx; the problem is that it is not OK for Cyrus. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum.
Re: mailutil transfer and bad messages
Mark Crispin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Cliff Green wrote: Just a note - that's okay for an mbox-format folder, mbx folders are a different story; you'll probably need to copy those messages to an mbox folder, remove the extra header, then move them back to the mbx folder. What's OK for an mbox format mailbox is also OK for mbx; the problem is that it is not OK for Cyrus. I found on the web some tips about it, it requires patching imap/message.c in the cyrus source directory. It shows that Cyrus reject unconditionnaly: 1 - message body containing the '\0' character 2 - header name not terminated by a ':', such as 'From ' 3 - empty line in headers 4 - null-name header like ': value' Mark, which above conditions are accepted or rejected by UW-IMAP ? Thanks. -- Nicolas
Re: mailutil transfer and bad messages
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Nicolas Kowalski wrote: Mark, which above conditions are accepted or rejected by UW-IMAP ? UW imapd does not reject any of these; it will accept whatever garbage you throw at it. Whether it does anything useful with that garbage subsequently depends upon the nature of that garbage. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum.
Re: IMAP ANNOTATE MORE support
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I need ANNOTATE support. I've found on the website the you were planning to do the support, but I cant found anything in hte documentation. There is currently no support for ANNOTATE and ANNOTATEMORE in c-client. You are the first person who has asked for it. Please note that ANNOTATE and ANNOTATEMORE are still under development in the IETF IMAPEXT working group, and as such the specification is subject to change. I can not predict at the present time when ANNOTATE and/or ANNOTATEMORE support will be added. This is a fairly large capability, and there are other projects. It is possible that a basic IMAP-client only support (as opposed to general c-client support and UW imapd support) can be added soon rather than later. This would be on the lines of the existing support for ACL and QUOTA; meaning that you call internal IMAP driver functions through unofficial interfaces. If this is OK, please let me know. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum.
