inactive issues

2015-02-24 Thread lennart spitzner
hi,

i noticed today's run at the closing inactive issues on the tracker. i would 
like to to ask an innocent question: what exactly is the benefit of this action?
(i disclose that it seems to me that valid, if inactive, issues are being 
closed, which i do not like. but before complaining, i want to know the
counter-arguments).

Lennart
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel


Re: Cabal-1.22 keyed library filepaths

2015-02-24 Thread Jens Petersen
Hi Edward,

On 9 February 2015 at 07:10, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
 Jens, could file a Cabal bug for the contents of this email?

I opened https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/2437.

Sorry for the delay, I was travelling and just saw your mail now.

Thanks, Jens
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel


Re: Looking for a new release manager for cabal

2015-02-24 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi,

On 22 February 2015 at 14:01, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 After about 3 years of cabal releases I'm looking for someone else to take
 over the responsibility as cabal release manager.

Thank you for all your hard work managing Cabal releases during all this time.
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel


Re: inactive issues

2015-02-24 Thread Johan Tibell
Good question.

These issues were closed on my request. I've done similar clean-ups in the
past.

The issue tracker has gotten to large to be effective in help guide our
work. We need to clean it up. In addition, lots of these issues weren't
linked to the original reporter, making it less likely that the original
reporter would step up with more information if needed, etc.

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Thomas Tuegel ttue...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:52 PM, lennart spitzner
 l...@informatik.uni-kiel.de wrote:
  hi,
 
  i noticed today's run at the closing inactive issues on the tracker. i
 would like to to ask an innocent question: what exactly is the benefit of
 this action?
  (i disclose that it seems to me that valid, if inactive, issues are
 being closed, which i do not like. but before complaining, i want to know
 the
  counter-arguments).

 The most important reason is that we do not now, nor will we ever,
 have the human resources to fix all those issues. When we have done
 this before, we usually get a few people who chime in about an issue
 that still affects them. This allows us to prioritize on issues that
 cause actual developers actual problems. It also lets us find these
 issues; there are still valid issues back there, on Page 28 of our
 GitHub issue tracker, but I know I never venture back there.

 If an issue was closed that still causes you problems, you should by
 all means request that it be reopened.

 --
 Thomas Tuegel
 ___
 cabal-devel mailing list
 cabal-devel@haskell.org
 http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel

___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel


Re: inactive issues

2015-02-24 Thread Thomas Tuegel
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:52 PM, lennart spitzner
l...@informatik.uni-kiel.de wrote:
 hi,

 i noticed today's run at the closing inactive issues on the tracker. i 
 would like to to ask an innocent question: what exactly is the benefit of 
 this action?
 (i disclose that it seems to me that valid, if inactive, issues are being 
 closed, which i do not like. but before complaining, i want to know the
 counter-arguments).

The most important reason is that we do not now, nor will we ever,
have the human resources to fix all those issues. When we have done
this before, we usually get a few people who chime in about an issue
that still affects them. This allows us to prioritize on issues that
cause actual developers actual problems. It also lets us find these
issues; there are still valid issues back there, on Page 28 of our
GitHub issue tracker, but I know I never venture back there.

If an issue was closed that still causes you problems, you should by
all means request that it be reopened.

-- 
Thomas Tuegel
___
cabal-devel mailing list
cabal-devel@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel