Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Y via Cake]

--- Begin Message ---
Hi.

I cant. then I adjust fq_codel.
ty :)
yutaka

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:39:12 +0300
Jonathan Morton  wrote:

> > qdisc cake 8002: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit
> > (?diffserv?)  
> 
> This suggests that the kernel is in a Diffserv mode that the
> userspace tc version doesn't understand.  Since Toke has just been
> fiddling with that, you should ensure you update and recompile *both*
> the kernel module and the iproute2 package.
> 
>  - Jonathan Morton
> 

--- End Message ---
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Jonathan Morton]

> qdisc cake 8002: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit (?diffserv?)

This suggests that the kernel is in a Diffserv mode that the userspace tc 
version doesn't understand.  Since Toke has just been fiddling with that, you 
should ensure you update and recompile *both* the kernel module and the 
iproute2 package.

 - Jonathan Morton

___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Y via Cake]

--- Begin Message ---
Hi.
I did and reboot.
but this.

yutaka

pi@raspberrypi:~ $ tc -d -s qdisc
qdisc noqueue 0: dev lo root refcnt 2 
 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) 
 backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc cake 8002: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit (?diffserv?)
srchost testflags 502044 rtt 100.0ms raw atm overhead -4 Sent 148612
bytes 1147 pkt (dropped 1, overlimits 94 requeues 0) backlog 0b 0p
requeues 0

qdisc ingress : dev eth0 parent :fff1  
 Sent 304061 bytes 1159 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) 
 backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc cake 8001: dev ifb0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 11500Kbit
(?diffserv?) dsthost testflags 502044 rtt 100.0ms raw atm overhead -4
Sent 320245 bytes 1159 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 166 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0


--- End Message ---
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Y via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> writes:

> From: Y <intruder_t...@yahoo.fr>
> Subject: Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode
> To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 21:40:48 +0900
>
> Hi.
>
> mine stat doen't  inclued more.
> sad.

Did you upgrade the kernel module without updating tc, or vice versa?

-Toke
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Pete Heist  writes:

>> On Apr 21, 2018, at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Morton  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Improved intra-flow latency could be useful for HTTP/2 or other things, but 
>>> I don’t see how the current llt mode helps most ordinary people with that, 
>>> when it would only apply to flows with certain diffserv markings, and 
>>> doesn’t seem to adjust the target and interval anyway…
>> 
>> Well, at some point the intended functionality seems to have got corrupted, 
>> though it could be put back in without difficulty.  But I'm certainly not 
>> among LLT's userbase; I put the mode in mostly as a demonstration that Cake 
>> could do it if required.  If the originators are no longer pursuing the 
>> proposal, then the mode has no reason to exist any more.
>> 
>> The bulk tin often gets its parameters adjusted, by virtue of the fact that 
>> its threshold is a small fraction of the total.  It happens in the other 
>> modes as well.  Don't take that as significant.
>
> I see. Well, since it’s not working anyway and we haven’t heard
> anything about it, I’m also for carting it away...

Already nuked it from the cobalt branch :)

-Toke
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Pete Heist]

> On Apr 21, 2018, at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Morton  wrote:
>> 
>> Improved intra-flow latency could be useful for HTTP/2 or other things, but 
>> I don’t see how the current llt mode helps most ordinary people with that, 
>> when it would only apply to flows with certain diffserv markings, and 
>> doesn’t seem to adjust the target and interval anyway…
> 
> Well, at some point the intended functionality seems to have got corrupted, 
> though it could be put back in without difficulty.  But I'm certainly not 
> among LLT's userbase; I put the mode in mostly as a demonstration that Cake 
> could do it if required.  If the originators are no longer pursuing the 
> proposal, then the mode has no reason to exist any more.
> 
> The bulk tin often gets its parameters adjusted, by virtue of the fact that 
> its threshold is a small fraction of the total.  It happens in the other 
> modes as well.  Don't take that as significant.

I see. Well, since it’s not working anyway and we haven’t heard anything about 
it, I’m also for carting it away...___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Jonathan Morton]

>> Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting?
> 
> I re-tested diffserv-llt quickly using the current head of cake and tc-adv 
> and am confused by something:
> 
> http://drhleny.cz/bufferbloat/cake/round5/diffserv_rrul_eg_cake_ds-llt_50mbit/index.html
> 
> When I look at the qdisc stats for cake, there are 5 tins: Low Loss, Best 
> Effort, Low Delay, Bulk and Net Control. Shouldn’t the Low Delay tin have its 
> target and interval reduced to something below 5ms and 100ms? And the bulk 
> tin has a target and interval of 5.8ms and 100.8ms(?)
> 
> In short, I forget how diffserv-llt was supposed to work, regardless of 
> whether or not it’s on the chopping block. No need for a history lesson if it 
> will be removed… :)
> 
> Improved intra-flow latency could be useful for HTTP/2 or other things, but I 
> don’t see how the current llt mode helps most ordinary people with that, when 
> it would only apply to flows with certain diffserv markings, and doesn’t seem 
> to adjust the target and interval anyway…

Well, at some point the intended functionality seems to have got corrupted, 
though it could be put back in without difficulty.  But I'm certainly not among 
LLT's userbase; I put the mode in mostly as a demonstration that Cake could do 
it if required.  If the originators are no longer pursuing the proposal, then 
the mode has no reason to exist any more.

The bulk tin often gets its parameters adjusted, by virtue of the fact that its 
threshold is a small fraction of the total.  It happens in the other modes as 
well.  Don't take that as significant.

 - Jonathan Morton

___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Y via Cake]

--- Begin Message ---
Hi.

mine stat doen't  inclued more.
sad.

yutaka

pi@raspberrypi:~ $ tc -s -d qdisc
qdisc noqueue 0: dev lo root refcnt 2 
 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) 
 backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc cake 8017: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit diffserv3
srchost rtt 100.0ms raw atm overhead -4 Sent 42114643 bytes 197572 pkt
(dropped 232, overlimits 73726 requeues 0) backlog 0b 0p requeues 0

qdisc ingress : dev eth0 parent :fff1  
 Sent 192984793 bytes 176545 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) 
 backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc cake 8016: dev ifb0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 11500Kbit diffserv3
dsthost rtt 100.0ms raw atm overhead -4 Sent 195434409 bytes 176530 pkt
(dropped 14, overlimits 107096 requeues 0) backlog 0b 0p requeues 0


On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 10:44:19 +0200
Pete Heist  wrote:

> > On Apr 19, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting?  
> 
> I re-tested diffserv-llt quickly using the current head of cake and
> tc-adv and am confused by something:
> 
> http://drhleny.cz/bufferbloat/cake/round5/diffserv_rrul_eg_cake_ds-llt_50mbit/index.html
> 
> When I look at the qdisc stats for cake, there are 5 tins: Low Loss,
> Best Effort, Low Delay, Bulk and Net Control. Shouldn’t the Low Delay
> tin have its target and interval reduced to something below 5ms and
> 100ms? And the bulk tin has a target and interval of 5.8ms and
> 100.8ms(?)
> 
> In short, I forget how diffserv-llt was supposed to work, regardless
> of whether or not it’s on the chopping block. No need for a history
> lesson if it will be removed… :)
> 
> Improved intra-flow latency could be useful for HTTP/2 or other
> things, but I don’t see how the current llt mode helps most ordinary
> people with that, when it would only apply to flows with certain
> diffserv markings, and doesn’t seem to adjust the target and interval
> anyway… ___ Cake mailing
> list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake



--- End Message ---
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Pete Heist]

> On Apr 19, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen  wrote:
> 
> Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting?

I re-tested diffserv-llt quickly using the current head of cake and tc-adv and 
am confused by something:

http://drhleny.cz/bufferbloat/cake/round5/diffserv_rrul_eg_cake_ds-llt_50mbit/index.html

When I look at the qdisc stats for cake, there are 5 tins: Low Loss, Best 
Effort, Low Delay, Bulk and Net Control. Shouldn’t the Low Delay tin have its 
target and interval reduced to something below 5ms and 100ms? And the bulk tin 
has a target and interval of 5.8ms and 100.8ms(?)

In short, I forget how diffserv-llt was supposed to work, regardless of whether 
or not it’s on the chopping block. No need for a history lesson if it will be 
removed… :)

Improved intra-flow latency could be useful for HTTP/2 or other things, but I 
don’t see how the current llt mode helps most ordinary people with that, when 
it would only apply to flows with certain diffserv markings, and doesn’t seem 
to adjust the target and interval anyway…
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Dave Taht]

kill it.

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen  wrote:
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen  writes:
>
>> Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? The draft describing
>> it seems to have expired ages ago:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-tsvwg-latency-loss-tradeoff/
>
> Also, adding to the diffserv thing, right now there seems to be a hidden
> ABI where the different diffserv modes are hard-coded in tc. That is not
> good for upstreaming, that should go into the header; I'll clean that
> up, but thought I'd remove the LLT mode while I'm at it if (as I
> suspect) no one actually needs it...
>
> -Toke
> ___
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake



-- 

Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen  writes:

> Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? The draft describing
> it seems to have expired ages ago:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-tsvwg-latency-loss-tradeoff/

Also, adding to the diffserv thing, right now there seems to be a hidden
ABI where the different diffserv modes are hard-coded in tc. That is not
good for upstreaming, that should go into the header; I'll clean that
up, but thought I'd remove the LLT mode while I'm at it if (as I
suspect) no one actually needs it...

-Toke
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

[Cake] Diffserv LLT mode

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Is anyone actually using the LLT diffserv setting? The draft describing
it seems to have expired ages ago:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-tsvwg-latency-loss-tradeoff/

-Toke
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake