[Cameramakers] (no subject)

2001-01-04 Thread Dangmedang

I know this sounds dumb but what is a condenser lens exactly.  I know
several sources for a variety of different kind of lenses, maybe I could
help.

Gene Johnson

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hello!
 
 I have a printmaker 35mm enlarger. I'd like to upgrade it to cover 6x6
 Holga negs. There is a kit from Beseler for $100-150 which includes 2 4"
 condenser lenses which go in the current head. I'd rather not spend this
 much. Anyone have a surplus source where I can buy condenser lenses?
 
 I could build the little tray to hold the lenses.
 
 Any other ideas in converting an enlarger like this to cover a larger
 format,
 
 Thanks
 
 Mac
 ___
___
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers



Re: [Cameramakers] using CCD's for cameras

2001-01-04 Thread J. Wayde Allen

On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, ken watson wrote:

 The packages are hermetically sealed. It would be difficult removing the
 glass, the color filters will most likely change once exposed to humidity
 and other contaminants…we are talking about 5 micron sq. photodiodes so dust
 may also be a problem.

OK, but since these things are used in real devices the flare issue can
probably be dealt with.  How do the scanner manufacturers solve the flare
problem that got us to this point?

The obvious solution that comes to mind for me would be to minimize
internal reflections in the camera housing.  Even traditional film isn't
flat black and causes some flare.

Perhaps the digital sensor could be mounted at a slight angle so that
surface reflections would be directed at a light absorbing surface?  As
long as you know that angle, and possible the transfer function of the
optical path, you could probably correct the resulting image abberations
programatically or even design the optics to compensate.

 This is a lot of “spoofing” to get the device to do what you may want. The
 problem centers around most flat bed scanners actually scan the underside
 lip first where they get the information for white balance  AND light level
 before they read the glass. If the sensor encounters out of range I have no
 idea what they do.

I think there are serveral issues here.  First of all, people have already
made cameras out of old scanners, so we know that it CAN be
done.  Secondly, this group has a fair number of tinkerers, engineers, and
machinists so even hacking into the low level electronics, although
perhaps difficult, can be part of the "fun".  Finally, you have to
consider that one may not need to go any lower level than this to simply
get a scanner to do what you want.

 I do not know of any one that has engineering kits.

A search on the web found a kit from TI
http://www.ti.com/sc/docs/psheets/abstract/apps/socu005.htm.
Not to mention that there is a pretty big market for computer imaging
systems, not just digital cameras and scanners, that sells imaging
solutions.  For example:

   http://www.sbig.com/sbwhtmls/online.htm
   http://www.mars-cam.com/frame/boardccd/boardccd.html
   http://www.ti.com/sc/docs/msp/snapshot.htm

 The other issue is that the CCD itself can be damaged by only 5KV of
 static discharge. This is considered extremely low so any handling of
 the device or assembly is hazardous to it’s health.

The electrostatic discharge issue is nothing particularly new.  The chips
in your PC can be damaged by 5 kV discharges.  However, I agree that this
is on the low end of the scale.  If you get a noticeable static spark from
your fingers it can easily have a potential of 100 kV or more.  There are
however ways to mitigate the problem.

I think the key thing is that this is a pretty experimental crowd.  I'd
like to foster a sense of innovation here and see what people can come up
with.

- Wayde
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


___
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers



Re: [Cameramakers] 4 condenser lenses for enlarger?

2001-01-04 Thread darkroommike

Here's a couple thoughts on the condenser lenses thing.

First:  condenser lenses take light that is scattered and moving in all
directions and get it all moving in (more or less) the same direction.  Thin
increases the intensity of the light moving through the negative, shortens
printing times and thus improves the efficiency of the enlarger.  The
downside of this is that any dust, lint or other no-see-ums on the negative
will also print with greater clarity and sharpness as well.  Condenser
lenses also focus the infrared part of the spectrum unless used with a large
sheet of heat adsorbing glass (an added expense).  Condenser lens enlargers
are sometimes so efficient they can sometimes burn a hole right through your
negative or at least cause it to "pop" and render your image on the easel
out-of-focus (the popping if of course more likely with medium format
negatives for two reasons--thinner film base stocks and more distance
between supporting edges of the carriers!).  You can fix this by using a
carrier with top and bottom glass plates to hold your negative flat--at the
expense of introducing four more surfaces that you need to dust before
printing.

Second:  a suggestion, don't use condensers at all!!  If all you are doing
is experimenting with medium format, replace the condensers with a couple of
sheets of ground glass and print using diffused light.  The dust problem
goes away but you've got to keep you're negative exposure and development to
a minimum because the light source isn't very efficient.  But if you fall in
love (with diffused light) you are in luck.  You can probably find a new or
used cold light head (fluorescent tube type) from Aristo to fit your
enlarger or a color head (which uses diffused quartz halogen light and
"mixing boxes" sized for the negative type) you are using for between $100
and $200.

darkroommike
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Cameramakers] 4" condenser lenses for enlarger?


 In a message dated 1/3/01 8:44:31 PM Central Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I know this sounds dumb but what is a condenser lens exactly.  I know
  several sources for a variety of different kind of lenses, maybe I could
  help.

  Gene Johnson

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Hello!
  
   I have a printmaker 35mm enlarger. I'd like to upgrade it to cover 6x6
   Holga negs. There is a kit from Beseler for $100-150 which includes 2
4"
   condenser lenses which go in the current head. I'd rather not spend
this
   much. Anyone have a surplus source where I can buy condenser lenses?
  
   I could build the little tray to hold the lenses.
  
   Any other ideas in converting an enlarger like this to cover a larger
   format,
  
   Thanks
  
   Mac
   ___ 
 A condenser lens is actually a pair of matched Convex lenses,
(Convex/plano?)
 placed 'back to back' in such a way that the curved surfaces face each
other
 in the middle, and the flats are on the outside. (The convex lenses are
 basiclly just magnifying lenses, but flat on one side) The idea behind the
 condenser lense is to allign the light rays into a more or less straight
 path. A four inch diameter condenser is just about the smallest one should
 try to use for 6x6. I know of no source of such lenses outside of the
 photography industry. One might try Edmund Scientific... They sell a lot
of
 lenses. I have a set of condensers such as one would use for 6x6, but I'm
 keeping them, sorry! (I also have a set for 8x10, lets talk!)
 Someone sugested replacing the Printmaker, via eBay. I agree. This could
well
 be the best way to go. Even if one could get the 6x6 setup working with
the
 printmaker, you must realize that the extra weight of the bigger glass
would
 tend to make it unstable, and top heavy. Find an old Bessler 23c II. VERY
 rugged, very stable, parts still available.
 Best of luck:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 Cameramakers mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers

___
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers



Re: [Cameramakers] optical switchs.

2001-01-04 Thread J. Wayde Allen

On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Michel Dusariez wrote:

 Thanks for all repys about optical switchs.

Gene Johnson sent me some scanned schematics for some optically switched
relays.  I've made this scan available on the web at
http://rmp.opusis.com/cameramakers/relays.jpg.

- Wayde
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


___
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers



Re: [Cameramakers] Linear CCD's for cameras

2001-01-04 Thread Ramona

I looked at a local spy shop a while ago. They have several "spy pinhole
cameras" that produced unbelievably good pictures for their resolution. They
work with a VCR so I suppose a USB frame grabber or something would work to
capture pictures. The surprising thing was the sensitivity it had for low
light levels. The one I was looking at was going for $75.00. It was a module
needing an external power supply - another $12.00 or so for one of the
transformer 6V jobs.

I  am thinking of using something like this as a previewer for a long
pinhole camera in order to aim it.

Larry

-Original Message-
From: Gregg Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, January 04, 2001 11:11 AM
Subject: RE: [Cameramakers] Linear CCD's for cameras


I modified a Barbie digital camera about a year and a half ago to use a
pinhole.  I was curious to see the effect of direct rays of light on the
CCD.  The biggest problem I had was in getting an image at all.  The optimal
pinhole size was too small to allow enough light through to

___
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers



Re: [Cameramakers] using CCD's for cameras

2001-01-04 Thread G.Penate


- Original Message - 
From: "Brian Reynolds" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Please unsubscribe me - thank you in advance.

Do it yourself, follow the link at the bottom of this message.

___
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers