Nvelocity vs. scaffolding
Hi again, since I'm quite new to VS08, C# and Castle I started programming by linking to the dll files at C:\Programm Files\Castle Project. Today I wanted to do it better by creating a lib folder within the project directory. I seemed to have found all files necessary, all unit tests were green. Then I renamed the NUnit and Castle folder at C:\Programm Files ... in order to make sure it worked. Then I realised, that there was no link to nvelocity.cll. I copied it into my lib folder and there it was: --- Unable to cast object of type 'System.Collections.ArrayList' to type 'System.Collections.Generic.List`1[System.String]'. Stack Trace: [InvalidCastException: Unable to cast object of type 'System.Collections.ArrayList' to type 'System.Collections.Generic.List`1[System.String]'.] Commons.Collections.ExtendedProperties.GetStringList(String key) +115 NVelocity.Runtime.Resource.Loader.AssemblyResourceLoader.Init (ExtendedProperties configuration) +61 NVelocity.Runtime.Resource.ResourceManagerImpl.Initialize (IRuntimeServices rs) +465 NVelocity.Runtime.RuntimeInstance.initializeResourceManager() +468 NVelocity.Runtime.RuntimeInstance.Init() +118 NVelocity.Runtime.RuntimeInstance.Init(ExtendedProperties p) +78 NVelocity.App.VelocityEngine.Init(ExtendedProperties p) +55 Castle.Components.Common.TemplateEngine.NVelocityTemplateEngine.NVelocityTemplateEngine.BeginInit () +1070 Castle.MonoRail.ActiveRecordScaffold.ScaffoldingSupport.InitializeTemplateEngine () +99 Castle.MonoRail.ActiveRecordScaffold.ScaffoldingSupport.Process (Controller controller) +85 Castle.MonoRail.Framework.ControllerLifecycleExecutor.ProcessScaffoldIfPresent () +140 Castle.MonoRail.Framework.ControllerLifecycleExecutor.InitializeController (String areaName, String controllerName, String actionName) +125 Castle.MonoRail.Framework.EngineContextModule.CreateControllerAndRunStartRequestFilters (Object sender, EventArgs e) +628 System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute () +68 System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean completedSynchronously) +75 --- Everything worked well this morning. What did I do wrong? Did I miss any files in my lib directory? These files are currently inside: Castle.ActiveRecord.dll Castle.Components.Binder.dll Castle.Components.Binder.dll.VisualState.xml Castle.Components.Common.EmailSender.dll Castle.Components.Common.TemplateEngine.dll Castle.Components.Common.TemplateEngine.NVelocityTemplateEngine.dll Castle.Components.Validator.dll Castle.Core.dll Castle.MonoRail.ActiveRecordScaffold.dll Castle.MonoRail.ActiveRecordSupport.dll Castle.MonoRail.Framework.dll Castle.MonoRail.Framework.Views.NVelocity.dll FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.dll Iesi.Collections.dll log4net.dll NHibernate.dll NHibernate.Mapping.Attributes.dll NVelocity.dll I''ve found out, that it only affects controllers using scaffolding. The others just work fine ... Best regards, Flo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Nvelocity vs. scaffolding
Forgot to mention: using RC3 Sorry, Flo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: AR: FindAllByProperty with LIKE
It worked. Thanks, Mark! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: AR: FindAllByProperty with LIKE
no problem :) On Jan 26, 10:31 am, Flominator flomina...@gmx.net wrote: It worked. Thanks, Mark! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to do DDD + AR (repositories)
Well you wouldn't necessarily have to make a repo for every entity because you'd have a generic RepoT you could use. However you might create (as an example) a UserRepo : BaseRepoUser with a FindByUsername method as a little syntactic sugar. I think many people would use a container such as windsor to avoid having to manually instantiate their repositories. On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mark Jensen don...@gmail.com wrote: Hi From what i can read on the internet people do really like this combination due to the placement of the persitance logic. how ever, i know that Castles AR has something callsed ActiveRecordMediator which seems to be the solution to the problem above. (i also know ayendes rhino commons which also have an implementation of the repository pattern). The questions are. 1. Will i lose something if i stop inheritting from ActiveRecordBase and use ActiveRecordMediatior instead? (to me it seems like i will get a lot more functionality/control) 2. Can someone me how to implement the Repository pattern with ActiveRecordMediator. I have found this example here http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/johnteague/archive/2008/05/27/using-database-repository-pattern-with-activerecord-with-activerecordmediator.aspx but to me it seems like I would have to make a Repository (and inherit from BaseRepository) for every Aggregate and then I need to instantiate the Repository it when i want to use it. Is there a better way of doing this? :) best regards, Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to do DDD + AR (repositories)
You lose nothing with dropping ActiveRecordBase but convenience. But keep in mind: 1) AR classes without ARBase make good DTOs, but still bad domain classes. 2) Generic repositories are an antipattern. A repository should encapsulate the knowledge of an aggregate's persistence details. That contradicts with ready-to-use-plugs for LINQ or criteria queries. If you need to do DDD, use AR as DTO and map it to the domain layer. If you are doing this because DDD has a momentary hype, just don't do it at all. The Domain Model is not the only enterprise pattern that yields maintainable software. -Markus 2009/1/26 Mark Jensen don...@gmail.com: Hi From what i can read on the internet people do really like this combination due to the placement of the persitance logic. how ever, i know that Castles AR has something callsed ActiveRecordMediator which seems to be the solution to the problem above. (i also know ayendes rhino commons which also have an implementation of the repository pattern). The questions are. 1. Will i lose something if i stop inheritting from ActiveRecordBase and use ActiveRecordMediatior instead? (to me it seems like i will get a lot more functionality/control) 2. Can someone me how to implement the Repository pattern with ActiveRecordMediator. I have found this example here http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/johnteague/archive/2008/05/27/using-database-repository-pattern-with-activerecord-with-activerecordmediator.aspx but to me it seems like I would have to make a Repository (and inherit from BaseRepository) for every Aggregate and then I need to instantiate the Repository it when i want to use it. Is there a better way of doing this? :) best regards, Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to do DDD + AR (repositories)
This cries for at least to mention those other patterns. On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Markus Zywitza markus.zywi...@gmail.comwrote: The Domain Model is not the only enterprise pattern that yields maintainable software. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to do DDD + AR (repositories)
:) so you would also do something like the example from the link shows, but just remove the FindAll ? On Jan 26, 12:20 pm, Ken Egozi egoz...@gmail.com wrote: my take: externally the domain API will expose specialised repositories for aggregate roots. (not all of them should have Save, and a generic FindAll is not informative imo) internally, in the repository implementations, they'd use ARMediator (or NH queries) to retrieve manipulate data On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Colin Ramsay colinram...@gmail.com wrote: Well you wouldn't necessarily have to make a repo for every entity because you'd have a generic RepoT you could use. However you might create (as an example) a UserRepo : BaseRepoUser with a FindByUsername method as a little syntactic sugar. I think many people would use a container such as windsor to avoid having to manually instantiate their repositories. On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mark Jensen don...@gmail.com wrote: Hi From what i can read on the internet people do really like this combination due to the placement of the persitance logic. how ever, i know that Castles AR has something callsed ActiveRecordMediator which seems to be the solution to the problem above. (i also know ayendes rhino commons which also have an implementation of the repository pattern). The questions are. 1. Will i lose something if i stop inheritting from ActiveRecordBase and use ActiveRecordMediatior instead? (to me it seems like i will get a lot more functionality/control) 2. Can someone me how to implement the Repository pattern with ActiveRecordMediator. I have found this example here http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/johnteague/archive/2008/05/27/using-d... but to me it seems like I would have to make a Repository (and inherit from BaseRepository) for every Aggregate and then I need to instantiate the Repository it when i want to use it. Is there a better way of doing this? :) best regards, Mark -- Ken Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to do DDD + AR (repositories)
Hi Markus Could you explain the contradictions a bit more for me? thanks :) On Jan 26, 1:22 pm, Markus Zywitza markus.zywi...@gmail.com wrote: You lose nothing with dropping ActiveRecordBase but convenience. But keep in mind: 1) AR classes without ARBase make good DTOs, but still bad domain classes. 2) Generic repositories are an antipattern. A repository should encapsulate the knowledge of an aggregate's persistence details. That contradicts with ready-to-use-plugs for LINQ or criteria queries. If you need to do DDD, use AR as DTO and map it to the domain layer. If you are doing this because DDD has a momentary hype, just don't do it at all. The Domain Model is not the only enterprise pattern that yields maintainable software. -Markus 2009/1/26 Mark Jensen don...@gmail.com: Hi From what i can read on the internet people do really like this combination due to the placement of the persitance logic. how ever, i know that Castles AR has something callsed ActiveRecordMediator which seems to be the solution to the problem above. (i also know ayendes rhino commons which also have an implementation of the repository pattern). The questions are. 1. Will i lose something if i stop inheritting from ActiveRecordBase and use ActiveRecordMediatior instead? (to me it seems like i will get a lot more functionality/control) 2. Can someone me how to implement the Repository pattern with ActiveRecordMediator. I have found this example here http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/johnteague/archive/2008/05/27/using-d... but to me it seems like I would have to make a Repository (and inherit from BaseRepository) for every Aggregate and then I need to instantiate the Repository it when i want to use it. Is there a better way of doing this? :) best regards, Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to do DDD + AR (repositories)
Code from the article you linked:
public virtual T FindOne(params ICriterion[] criteria)
{
return ActiveRecordMediatorT.FindOne(criteria);
}
This moves the responsibility for creating a particular query from the
repository to the higher layers, who need to know about an aggregate's
inner workings. Once you start to optimize for n+1 etc., this
knowledge of the persistence is rather deepened than encapsulated.
A better approach is to create a bunch of
FindByWhateverMyAppNeeds(string iNeedThat). That's ugly, but
encapsulates persistence within the repository.
-Markus
2009/1/26 Mark Jensen don...@gmail.com:
Hi Markus
Could you explain the contradictions a bit more for me?
thanks :)
On Jan 26, 1:22 pm, Markus Zywitza markus.zywi...@gmail.com wrote:
You lose nothing with dropping ActiveRecordBase but convenience.
But keep in mind:
1) AR classes without ARBase make good DTOs, but still bad domain classes.
2) Generic repositories are an antipattern. A repository should
encapsulate the knowledge of an aggregate's persistence details. That
contradicts with ready-to-use-plugs for LINQ or criteria queries.
If you need to do DDD, use AR as DTO and map it to the domain layer.
If you are doing this because DDD has a momentary hype, just don't do
it at all. The Domain Model is not the only enterprise pattern that
yields maintainable software.
-Markus
2009/1/26 Mark Jensen don...@gmail.com:
Hi
From what i can read on the internet people do really like this
combination due to the placement of the persitance logic.
how ever, i know that Castles AR has something callsed
ActiveRecordMediator which seems to be the solution to the problem
above. (i also know ayendes rhino commons which also have an
implementation of the repository pattern).
The questions are.
1. Will i lose something if i stop inheritting from ActiveRecordBase
and use ActiveRecordMediatior instead? (to me it seems like i will get
a lot more functionality/control)
2. Can someone me how to implement the Repository pattern with
ActiveRecordMediator. I have found this example here
http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/johnteague/archive/2008/05/27/using-d...
but to me it seems like I would have to make a Repository (and inherit
from BaseRepository) for every Aggregate and then I need to
instantiate the Repository it when i want to use it.
Is there a better way of doing this?
:)
best regards,
Mark
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: WCF Facility and console self-hosted web services
It is not any missing dependency nor logging facility... If I use the
following code and open ServiceHost explicitly it just works:
var factory = new DefaultServiceHostFactory
(IoC.Container.Kernel);
host = factory.CreateServiceHost(sms_wcf, new[] {new Uri
(http://localhost:9001/my/service.svc;)});
host.Open();
The problem with this approach is that I do not know how to pass
config settings ( bindings, behaviours) from app.config.
R.
On Jan 26, 12:27 am, Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com wrote:
It's probable that you one or more dependencies have not been satisfied so
the ServiceHost is not available. Since you are using logging, you need to
register the logger facility
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Robert M. robertcmir...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone can help with an example on how can I configure and start
a webservice using WCF facility in a console application?
I used the following configuration, but although it compiles and runs,
the endpoint is not available (I believe the host is not started).
IoC.Container
.AddFacilityWcfFacility()
.Register(
Component.ForIMyService().ImplementedByMyService()
.Named(my_wcf)
.ActAs(
new DefaultServiceModel().LogMessages()
.AddEndpoints(
WcfEndpoint.BoundTo(new
BasicHttpBinding(Basic)).At(http://localhost:9001/my/service.svc;)
)
));
The problem I am trying to resolve is to use a WCF webservice setup
with WCF facility but with config settings taken from App.config. All
examples found in facility's unit tests use a web hosted service which
works just fine. My app is a console application only.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: WCF Facility and console self-hosted web services
That will always create the service host regardless of missing
dependencies. However, when you invoke it, it would then fail.
What is the definition os sms_wcf component?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Robert M. robertcmir...@gmail.com wrote:
Is not the dependency nor logging facility... If I use the following
code it just works:
var factory = new DefaultServiceHostFactory
(IoC.Container.Kernel);
host = factory.CreateServiceHost(sms_wcf, new[] {new Uri
(Config.WebserviceListenUri)});
On Jan 26, 12:27 am, Craig Neuwirt cneuw...@gmail.com wrote:
It's probable that you one or more dependencies have not been satisfied
so
the ServiceHost is not available. Since you are using logging, you need
to
register the logger facility
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Robert M. robertcmir...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does anyone can help with an example on how can I configure and start
a webservice using WCF facility in a console application?
I used the following configuration, but although it compiles and runs,
the endpoint is not available (I believe the host is not started).
IoC.Container
.AddFacilityWcfFacility()
.Register(
Component.ForIMyService().ImplementedByMyService()
.Named(my_wcf)
.ActAs(
new DefaultServiceModel().LogMessages()
.AddEndpoints(
WcfEndpoint.BoundTo(new
BasicHttpBinding(Basic)).At(http://localhost:9001/my/service.svc;)
)
));
The problem I am trying to resolve is to use a WCF webservice setup
with WCF facility but with config settings taken from App.config. All
examples found in facility's unit tests use a web hosted service which
works just fine. My app is a console application only.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: WCF Integration Facility Roadmap
Couple of issues I've observed. The first was that I had my service class had constructor dependencies that I'd not registered, this was obviously silly of me but when debugging all I kept getting was 502s when trying to contact my REST resources (programatically or using Fiddler) and it took me a while to work out the reason. I'm thus thinking that an exception server side might have been cool, to help point people to the source of the problem. Secondly since I'm building REST resources I'm not interested in the service interface that I would be with normal WCF. What I mean is that I'd be happy to apply the [ServiceContract] and [OperationContract] directly to my service class and not have it implement an interface that was tagged up with these attributes. If I do create the interface then the client will never use it anyway (because if I go down that path I'm back to RPC). So I'm wondering if you believe adding better support for this use case is possible? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
