Re: [Catalyst] Componentised actions.
These actions (like /schema/list) is processed by default handler in root controller so there are no such actions. See previous post 2007/3/30, Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:46:48AM -0300, Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote: On 3/29/07, Oleg Pronin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cannot forward to the list actions because they are not private actions (they have its own URLs). In docs 'forward' is for private actions. If the docs state that, they're wrong. It's perfectly possible to forward to public actions. When you start up the server in debug mode you can see the private names for the public paths. So, you forward to the action using its private name. -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] Componentised actions.
I have
The problem is that i have no physical /shema/list action:
::Controller::Root
sub default : Private {
load template by path,
i.e. for /schema/list url it processes root/src/schema/list.tt
(this is because i have many actions which doesn't neet perl work.
Only TT DBIx::Class)
}
::Controller::Configure
sub index : Private {
$c-forward('/schema/list');
}
and i got error
Couldn't forward to command /schema/list: Invalid action or component.
likely i need to fall in standart dispatch process to do that.
But plugin subrequest executes again auto actions etc. The code is executed
twice.
I need to execute only action i want but i need catalyst to look for it with
all dispatch rules.
2007/3/30, Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/29/07, Oleg Pronin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot forward to the list actions because they are not private
actions
(they have its own URLs). In docs 'forward' is for private actions.
If the docs state that, they're wrong. It's perfectly possible to
forward to public actions.
For example you can create url-action which edits some objects and
include
it in many templates. This is not like
ordinary template toolkit's include - this component can show itself,
modify
data, receive request params etc, like
any web page. And this doesnt depend on whether this action is directly
called from browser or included in some template.
You could have some thing like this:
sub nice_page : Local {
my ($self, $c) = @_;
$c-forward('object1');
$c-forward('object2');
}
Then, inside nice_page.tt:
[% INCLUDE object1.tt %]
[% INCLUDE object2.tt %]
Should do exactly what you want. And, well, if it doesn't you can
always use Catalyst::Plugin::SubRequest.
-Nilson Santos F. Jr.
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] Componentised actions.
Oleg Pronin schrieb: This might be useful for including completed components (with logic, view and model inside) in any website place. For example you can create url-action which edits some objects and include it in many templates. This is not like ordinary template toolkit's include - this component can show itself, modify data, receive request params etc, like any web page. Interestingly this is very much, what I'm doing in my Konstrukt Framework[1][2] (which of course is not even near as powerful as Catalyst): Each component will be inserted as a tag in a webpage. You can put multiple components into one page as well as combine (nest) them, if possible. A I started to develop this framework some years ago, I thought this concept is a good idea, and in some cases it's really nice: For example you can put the hit statistics component into the master template and _every_ web page now runs that component and fills the statistics. Each component completely handles its logic, model and view. It's a bit like a widget, that you can put inside your page. Now the disadvantages of my framework: - No REST by default. You cannot call a component by URL. This is what I'm missing most. The components have to be integrated in a web page, to which the URL points to. - Views/controllers get mixed up a bit: The client requests a page. This page contains markup that determines the general layout (view) and the components (kind of controller), which in turn return the output (view) for themselves. So I'm able to compose components easily, but only at the cost of a less clear separation of views and controllers. This design flaw might cause problems in bigger projects. Unfortunately I've not yet come up with an idea to combine the advantages of a clear separation between views and controllers with a _simple_ approach to compose several components and use them like widgets inside your page. Although the suggestion of Nilson Santos F. Jr., who also replied to your mail, seems to come close to that. [1] http://search.cpan.org/~twittek/Konstrukt-0.5-beta7/ [2] http://search.cpan.org/~twittek/Konstrukt-0.5-beta7/lib/Konstrukt/Doc.pod -- Thomas Wittek http://gedankenkonstrukt.de/ Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
RE: [Catalyst] Session problems with IE and cookies - workaround
Hey Dmitry ! Calling $c-reset_session_expires did the trick indeed ! Now authentication works both for IE and Opera. Thanks a million. Regards, Marc -Original Message- From: Dmitry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 5:51 PM To: catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Session problems with IE and cookies - workaround VT My workaround will: VT 1) Delete the old session VT 2) Create a new session VT 3) Return a dummy page, along with a new cookie and a redirect to VT site's main page There is easier workaround - just call $c-reset_session_expires on login. Why nor reset_session_expires neither extend_session_expires are not documented if they are public? ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
[Catalyst] When using multiple controllers as base
Hi, I was looking at source code for C::C::FormBuilder to know how to write Controller extention module. Then I thought using new() method is nice idea to run only once. But I realize when I want to use two controller extention modules same time, it may cause problem because of NEXT specification. e.x. Let's say , I want to use C::C::FormBuilder and C::C::BindLex same time. # Below case is OK use base qw/Catalyst::Controller::FormBuilder Catalyst::Controller::BindLex/; # In this case, C::C::FormBuilder-new will not called. use base qw/Catalyst::Controller::BindLex Catalyst::Controller::FormBuilder/; I think only first base module run NEXT but not the others. Am I doing something wrong?? or should not use new() ?? or should not use multiple controllers?? thanks, Tomohiro Teranishi ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] Componentised actions.
Oleg Pronin wrote: The problem is that i have no physical /shema/list action: Then I'd try to solve _this_ problem, and not work around it. Why don't you have one or more physical action(s) for list? .phaylon ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] Componentised actions.
- Original Message
From: Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 11:46:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Componentised actions.
On 3/29/07, Oleg Pronin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot forward to the list actions because they are not private actions
(they have its own URLs). In docs 'forward' is for private actions.
If the docs state that, they're wrong. It's perfectly possible to
forward to public actions.
For example you can create url-action which edits some objects and include
it in many templates. This is not like
ordinary template toolkit's include - this component can show itself, modify
data, receive request params etc, like
any web page. And this doesnt depend on whether this action is directly
called from browser or included in some template.
You could have some thing like this:
sub nice_page : Local {
my ($self, $c) = @_;
$c-forward('object1');
$c-forward('object2');
}
I was always nervous about doing this because of my fear about Stash namespace
collision. To be honest I have a love hate relationship with the stash because
I like the idea of having a ready made messaging system but because it's hash
based I feared the feeling I was making a very tightly coupled application.
You need to know the base stash key for your stuff, right? And then it needs
to be different for each action that you think might be in an action chain or
forwarded to as in the example above.
Have you run into this problem, found ways around it or just don't feel
paranoid about it?
--John
Then, inside nice_page.tt:
[% INCLUDE object1.tt %]
[% INCLUDE object2.tt %]
Should do exactly what you want. And, well, if it doesn't you can
always use Catalyst::Plugin::SubRequest.
-Nilson Santos F. Jr.
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
