[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Blue with CME

[Russ Meuchel]

Has anyone ever registered IP Blue LITE with CME?  My phone successfully
registers, but no lines show up even though I have them programmed.  In the
list of phone systems, it lists CallManager, but not CME.  Is it made to
only work with full CM?  Thanks.
Russ

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice v3 Home Lab

[Russ Meuchel]

I did a bit of research today and it turns out that purchasing the UC520 is
actually cheaper than buying a 1861 and building it out- and you obviously
get no CUE, FXS, FX0 with the 1861 out of the box (or voice bundle).
Granted, we're not doing fxs, fx0 on the CCIE Lab anymore, but it couldn't
hurt to have this for simulating customer networks etc.

MAIN SITE:
1760-V router off Ebay for $100 - $200
WS-C3560-8PC-S - Catalyst 3560 Compact 8 10/100 PoE + 1 T/SFP; IP Base Image
- $419
VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 - $600

SRST SITE & CME SITE each get the following:
UC520-8U-4FXO-K9 - 8-user configuration with 4 PSTN trunks (FXO), 4 analog
ports (FXS), 8 PoE ports, 1 VIC slot for expansion, Feature licenses for
call control, voicemail and Cisco Unified IP Phones - $1133
VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 - $600

 3 CP-7961G= - Cisco IP Phone 7961, spare - $134 x 3 = $402
Plus I'll have IP Blue / IP Communicator in addition to the real phones.

I'm still working on the VMWare piece for all of the servers.

All the prices listed above are 70% off NFR prices (except for the 1760 on
EBAY).  Thus, the total cost would be just under $5000.  Plus I need to
build the VMWare server...

 Do you see anything that I'm missing or any ways I could save cost?
Here a few things I'm still considering:

Perhaps another 1760 in place of the 2nd UC520?
Cut out one of the VWIC2 cards and just connect that router to the main
site via Ethernet.
Cut out the 3rd site completely since I could still practice gatekeeper,
CUBE, TI, E1, SRST, CME with just 2 UC520's.

If I did these options, I would save a significant amount but the lab would
only be good for practicing technologies, not doing a full lab.

Any thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Russ

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

[Michael Ciarfello]

Hi and welcome.

Did you upload the MOH file to all the other servers in the cluster?
Multicast routing enabled on the remote gateway?
You have 239.1.1.1 which implies FIRST music source, G.711.  Are you using 
G.711 over the WAN?
What does show ccm-manager music-on-hold output when the phone is on hold?
What does show ip mroute display when on hold?

There is a Cisco made document describing this feature.  Probably search for 
Moh from router flash on the Cisco web site.

The remote phone config file should have in it 239.1.1.1 for Moh.  You can get 
the phone.xml file from the TFTP directory if the appropriate TFTP service 
parameters are set or since you are a production system I wouldn't mess with 
them and would sniff the phone bootup packets to read that file from the 
sniffer.  The phone might be listening to another IP Address for some reason.

Multicast MOH from remote site flash is like the phone turning a radio channel. 
 If it doesn't tune to the proper channel (defined in the config file 
downloaded to the phone) you don't hear the radio program.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego 
[cristobalpri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:54 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use 
Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

Hello Experts,

This is not related to a lab or a pod,  sometimes i use my customer's networks 
to study

I have centralized deployment, the cluster has 2 servers running CCM 7.x, the 
MOH Servers are enabled for multicast, the ip address and port are configured, 
the multicast increment is set to "Ip address"
On the selected audio source field on the option 1 (which is the MOH file that 
we want to use) the hop count is set to 1
The MOH audio source has the box check for Allow multicasting.
I created an MRG that include both serves and is enabled for Multicast, the 
MRGL has the Moh MRG. the MRGL is assigned to the phones and the remote 
gateway. the phones have the user/network audio source selected to option 1
the remote gateway has the wav file loaded in flash.
the call-manager-fallback has the
ccm-manager music-on-hold
moh 
multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 

If I put a call on hold on the remote branch, the phone is not playing the 
music from the local gateway. i get beeps
either internal or external calls. what am i missing?

If i place a call internally i get the beeps, however in RTMT i can see that a 
multicast request becomes active

If i issue a show ccm-manager music-on-hold i don't see anything

your help is greatly appreciated

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but I was very very close to the lab

[Michael Ciarfello]

Oh boy, you should't leave that door open.  My thoughts in -->.


Hi,

It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family, friends 
and every our loved one.

--> Whah whah. Don't break your violin.  We are not joining the military and 
shipping out to Iraq.  And WHO is this loved one?  This guy got something going 
on on the side?



It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real stuff to 
pass the lab and this is really really fact.

--> Sets the tone of NDA violation there.  The guy must have been a literary 
genious.  Foreshadowing.



If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start forgetting the 
starting labs.

--> Sounds like he needs a memory upgrade.  After practicing, say MGCP in the 
REAL world on 100's of gateways, it just seems to stick.  SO that shouldn't be 
an issue.  You SHOULD have x years of real-world experience to go along with 
this certification.  I don't do IPMA every day, so there are some topics that 
have to be practiced and memorized.  MOST others should be mostly daily-use 
tasks.  I think the CCIE is there to VALIDATE your expertise you have been 
practicing.  You wouldn't want a doctor doing surgery on you right after 
medical school without internships, they have to go through. That's why they 
call these "professional" studies PRACTICES such as doctor's practice.



What i understand is we really need a practise practise / understanding to 
clearing the lab.

--> Real world expereince THEN since the lab is the way it is, practice labs 
from reputable companies like IPExpert.  This is like studying in school for 11 
years then taking the SATs (It's a US college entrance type test to assist 
colleges in deciding to accept a candidate.)  Some people can do well on the 
SAT (not me, lol).  MOST people do better when they pay (have their parents 
pay) for SAT prep classes such as Princeton Review, etc.  But PR is not 
stealing the test. Ok, maybe that example was not so good becasue it's allowed 
to publish previous years tests, etc.



I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they would have 
not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me to even get so close 
to the lab.

--> And the idiot still didn't pass.  Did he take a nap the rest of the time?  
Or stand up and say "I'm done. You can grade now.  I'll be at the bar."



I have done some mistake which has taken my lab

--> Like trying to cheat it in the first place.  That's why I hope Cisco does 
the open ended questions like they are doing for the R&S.  My "dream" would be 
a three-step process.  Written.  Recommendation from a Cisco entiry (SE, AM, 
channel partner rep, etc) then LAB.  The second qualifies candidates from 
people that know them.



I was practising since last 1 year

--> Doesn't say anything about his experience which is probably none.



I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs



I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.

--> Who cares.  I got the H324 lab.  H323, H324 whatever it takes. (extra 
points for pointing out that reference I twisted around.)



Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the support from 
everyone, Now we will see on ver 3

--> Yea, here's a big NY support welcome for you.



I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone want it :)

--> Replace the word Private with another word that begins with P.




From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Darby Weaver 
[ccie.wea...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:06 AM
To: CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but I was very very close to the 
lab

It is my interpretation that:

1. He was referring to materials that are dumps as well as legitimate materials.

2. He was offering to share copyright materials.


Any other interpretation?  Please read his comments again.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario

[Michael Ciarfello]

Can IPexpert create some kind of alerting system or at least put a "last 
revised" label on the labs so we know when things have been updated or newly 
released?


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Larry Hadrava 
[lar...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:55 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: Mark Snow; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Vik Malhi; Otto Sanchez
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario

Aamir:
I'm taking a closer look. Also please make sure that you have downloaded the 
latest Voice workbook versions as the new V3 blueprint workbook has been 
getting some updates as issues are reported.

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Aamir Panjwani 
mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au>> wrote:

Hi ipexpert,



We haven’t had any feedback regarding this issue. Can someone please look into 
it for us?



Thanks



From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com]

Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 10:07 AM
To: Otto Sanchez; Mark Snow; Vik Malhi
Cc: Aamir Panjwani; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario



Otto:

Very interesting. Your debugs confirmed my suspicion about the signaling not 
being carried properly.



I've copied Mark and Vik on this so you can the the scoop from the true 
authorities:-)

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Otto Sanchez 
mailto:otto.sanc...@damovo.com.ve>> wrote:

Hello,

I'm running into the exact same issue as Aamir does. If you make a debug ccsip 
messages of such a call, you don't see any sip response back to the cme sip 
phone when the call is answered at hq...,

I changed the signalling from h323 to sip and everything works just fine,

I was wondering if the reason why this call is failing is by the following 
statement:

"SIP endpoints are not supported on H.323 trunks. SIP endpoints are supported 
on SIP trunks only. "
source:cme config guide
http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guide/cmebasic.html

Any advice appreciated,

Otto




Mensaje original-
De: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 en nombre de Aamir Panjwani
Enviado el: mar 26/05/2009 18:39
Para: Larry Hadrava
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Asunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario


Thanks for your response Larry. When I call from CME SIP to any phone in
HQ via gatekeeper it rings on HQ phone but when I lift the handset or
press answer soft key it stops ringing on HQ phone (but "answer" key is
still displayed on the HQ phone) and at the same time it is ringing on
calling phone (CME SIP) with "ring out" on the display for 3 rings and
then it eventually disconnects.  There is no VM setup involve and it
works fine without gatekeeper.



I have testing above in my own lab, however, I ran into exactly same
problem when I had a proctor lab session last Saturday. So calling from
CME SIP (XLite) to HQ SIP (CIPC) same problem. What is even more
interesting is when I loaded final config of lab 4A in which everything
meant to be working I still had a same problem! and yes I did "revert
entire pod" before loading final lab 4A



Many Thanks



From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 8:47 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario



Aamir:

So, from the description, when calling from the SIP phone, the call goes
through and you answer the call but the SIP device does not show as
connected? Does it keep ringing of does it eventually go to VM?

I'm just wondering where the problem is - on the calling or called end.
Sounds like that some supervisory signaling is not being passed
properly.



Are you doing this lab on a Proctor labs rack? Does this setup work
without the gatekeeper?



Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com



On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Aamir Panjwani
mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au>> wrote:

Guys any idea regarding below issue please?



From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir
Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, 26 May 2009 6:23 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario



Hi All,



As per lab 4A  I have setup a GK trun

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario

[Aamir Panjwani]

Thanks Vik, first option worked! I enabled inbound fast start on h.323
gateway (not on GK trunk).

 

 

 

From: Vik Malhi [mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 11 June 2009 7:54 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani; Larry Hadrava; Otto Sanchez; Mark Snow
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario

 

Can you try a few things to see if they help- let me know if you have
already done this.

(1) Enable Inbound Fast Start on your H323 trunk and see if that helps
(on UCM).

If that makes no difference:

(2) Change the codec to g711u between the SIP CME phone and UCM. Both
the outbound dial-peer and DP on the trunk should use g711u. Also in
your voice register pool you should have g711u configured- confirm this
by "show voice register dial-peer".

If that makes no difference:

(3) Add a dspfarm xcoder on the HQ-RTR and place this into an MRG > MRGL
and assign to the DP of the trunk. Then check MTP Required.

I look forward to hearing back from you.


-- 
Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 
Fax: +1.810.454.0130 
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com


Join our free online support and peer group communities: 
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco
CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice
Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.










From: Aamir Panjwani 
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:55:57 +1000
To: Larry Hadrava , Otto Sanchez
, Mark Snow , Vik Malhi

Cc: OSL Group 
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario

Hi ipexpert,
 
We haven't had any feedback regarding this issue. Can someone please
look into it for us?
 
Thanks
 

From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 10:07 AM
To: Otto Sanchez; Mark Snow; Vik Malhi
Cc: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario


Otto:

Very interesting. Your debugs confirmed my suspicion about the signaling
not being carried properly. 



I've copied Mark and Vik on this so you can the the scoop from the true
authorities:-)


Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Otto Sanchez
 wrote:

Hello,

I'm running into the exact same issue as Aamir does. If you make a debug
ccsip messages of such a call, you don't see any sip response back to
the cme sip phone when the call is answered at hq...,

I changed the signalling from h323 to sip and everything works just
fine,

I was wondering if the reason why this call is failing is by the
following statement:

"SIP endpoints are not supported on H.323 trunks. SIP endpoints are
supported on SIP trunks only. "
source:cme config guide
http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guid
e/cmebasic.html

Any advice appreciated,

Otto




Mensaje original-
De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com en nombre de Aamir Panjwani
Enviado el: mar 26/05/2009 18:39
Para: Larry Hadrava
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Asunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario 



Thanks for your response Larry. When I call from CME SIP to any phone in
HQ via gatekeeper it rings on HQ phone but when I lift the handset or
press answer soft key it stops ringing on HQ phone (but "answer" key is
still displayed on the HQ phone) and at the same time it is ringing on
calling phone (CME SIP) with "ring out" on the display for 3 rings and
then it eventually disconnects.  There is no VM setup involve and it
works fine without gatekeeper.



I have testing above in my own lab, however, I ran into exactly same
problem when I had a proctor lab session last Saturday. So calling from
CME SIP (XLite) to HQ SIP (CIPC) same problem. What is even more
interesting is when I loaded final config of lab 4A in which everything
meant to be working I still had a same problem! and yes I did "revert
entire pod" before loading final lab 4A



Many Thanks



From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 8:47 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario



Aamir:

So, from the description, when calling from the SIP phone, the call goes
through and you answer the call but the SIP device does not show as
connected? Does it keep ringing of does it eventually go to VM?

I'm just wondering where the problem is - on the calling or called end.
Sounds like that some supervisory signaling is not being passed
properly.



Are you doing this lab on a Proctor labs rack? Does this setup work
without the gatekeeper?



Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com  



On Tue, May 26, 20

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on2phones

[Michael Ciarfello]

Well, we are thinking and using our experience to try things.  The CCIE is also 
a journey.  I didn't pass back in Feb, but I came out a lot sharper on the 
skills and basic building blocks.  Even these no solution scenarios are 
valuable because you never know what a customer will ask for and sometimes the 
answer is NO.

Wouldn't that be something to put no win scenarios on the lab and you have to 
explain why it doesn't work?

I'll shut up now before someone thinks it's a good idea.  lol.



From: Cliff McGlamry [cl...@mcglamry.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:26 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello; Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on2phones

My understanding is that you are correct.  The answer thus far is no.

From: Michael Ciarfello
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:44 PM
To: Cliff McGlamry ; Cristi 
Radescu ; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on2phones

Did this ever get solved?  Am I correct in saying the answer so far is NO?


From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry 
[cl...@mcglamry.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:47 PM
To: Cristi Radescu; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

Actually, you might be able to do it if it is on CME.

Assign button 2 as an overlay, and put the mailbox number DN on the overlay 
ephone-dn.  It should be hard forwarded so it will never ring, but I bet that 
would make the envelope appear the way being discussed.

From: Cristi Radescu
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:22 AM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones


I think this is not possible. With „secondary number” or „overlay” it will not 
work.


From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David Corbeil
Sent: 27 May, 2009 8:42 PM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2 phones

Hi,

I want to know if it’s possible to have the voicemail letter on the second line 
of 2 phones without changing the phone facing.

Example:

Phone 1
Line1 : 3001
Line2 : 3101

Phone 2
Line1 : 3002
Line2 : 3102

Each line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when a message is left on GDM I 
need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone.
Can’t have line 3
Can’t modify the look of the phone

It’s possible? If yes, how ?

Thanks

David Corbeil
Consultant en technologie | Technology Consultant
Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333
Membre de l’équipe TELUS

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC Presence statuses...

[Priyank Kiran]

How did you get the meeting thing to work... Exchange Calendaring?? That's
one feature I am not able to set. Any ideas / help appreciated..
-Priyank

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Cristobal Priego  wrote:

> that status is set through SIP.
>
> make sure that the user is associated to the proper gateway profile.
> restart the SIP Proxy.
>
> I have CPUC integrated and it will let you know when you are on the phone,
> idle, away, in a meeting, dnd
>
> 2009/6/9 Jonathan Charles 
>
> The primary extension is set.
>>
>> Both CUPC and the 7961 are associated to the user.
>>
>> The user is assigned to the DN on both devices.
>>
>> The user is listed as a UserID on both devices.
>>
>> CUPS is 7.0(2); CUCM is 7.0(1)
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Priyank Kiran
>> wrote:
>> > Make sure the setting for Primary Extension on the user page looks OK.
>> If
>> > both the softphone and deskphone share the same extension, you should be
>> OK
>> > after switching the application from softphone to deskphone.
>> >
>> > -Priyank
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Charles 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> OK, so we basically have three statuses...
>> >>
>> >> Available, green with a checkbox
>> >>
>> >> Idle, Yellow with a minus sign...
>> >>
>> >> and DND which is red with a slash
>> >>
>> >> How do we show that someone is on the phone? It appears to only work
>> >> when I make the call using the softphone... (CUPC), but if I set CUPC
>> >> to use the deskphone and make the call either thru the desk phone or
>> >> thru CUPC, I do not show as on the phone from other users...
>> >>
>> >> Control of the phone from CUPC works fine... no probs at all...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jonathan
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...

[Jason Granat]

I'll be there!

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vik Malhi
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:18 PM
To: Michael Ciarfello; Jonathan Charles; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...

We hope to find answers to questions such as the ones within this thread at
Networkers in San Francisco in a couple of weeks- anybody else going?

---


Join IPexpert as we bring you up to the minute live coverage from Cisco
Networkers on Sunday, June 28th and Monday, June 29th. On Sunday we will be
tweeting, blogging, and posting emails to OSL live from the CCIE Voice
Technical Seminar (formerly called a Techtorial) and also from the CCIE
Routing and Switching Technical Seminar. On Monday we will be tweeting,
blogging, and posting emails to OSL live from the CCIE Security Technical
Seminar.

We will cover a wide range of topics and posts, but our main focus will be
to get you any specific information we learn of regarding changes that are
coming to 3.0 Voice and 4.0 R&S Lab Exams, and all specific information
regarding changes that have already occurred to the 3.0 Security Lab Exam.

In order to deliver the information to you ³live² and up-to-the-minute,
while at the same time not to overwhelming our IPexpert Blog or OSL readers
with a million little posts (slight exaggeration possibly), we will use the
following format to update our various media outlets:

* We will post every newsworthy update live to three twitter accounts,
one for each CCIE Track and Technical Seminar. This way if you want live
coverage, you can watch one of those feeds for the track you are studying
for, while not receiving unnecessary ancillary information about a CCIE
Track you may have no interest in.
* We will then every couple of hours update both our official IPexpert
Blog, and make a email post out to OnlineStudyList with a summation of what
we have learned thus far.
* If you wish to discuss any of the information posted to any of these
forums, please post your comments to the respective OnlineStudyList mailing
list for that track, and we will respond with replies. Also, if you have any
questions for the Presenter, please ask them through OnlineStudyList, and we
will be sure to ask them by-proxy. (You DO need to be subscribed to the
particular OnlineStudyList mailing list before posting to that email alias)

So the links to where all of the information will be posted is as follows:

CCIE Voice Track Technical Seminar:

* Live Twitter Feed: http://twitter.com/IPexpertVoice
* IPexpert Blog: http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/


--
Vik Malhi ­ CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com


Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.







> From: Michael Ciarfello 
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:13:06 -0400
> To: Jonathan Charles , OSL Group
> 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...
>
> CUPS - the CCM 7 SRND and/or the CUP deployment guide has the number of
> servers.  There are multiple servers for redundancy or more capacity.
>
> UCCX is 1 or 2.
>
> LDAP is not difficult so I would say practice it.
>
> SIP Trunk provider.  Why not?
>
> I would jump off a bridge if LCS / OCS integration was on the test.  And that
> implies you are playing with the other team.
>
> Yea, CUPS and these other applications are much easier and consistent with an
> external LDAP but not REQUIRED.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:45 AM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...
>
> OK, I know this is getting tedious, but there is very little info out
> there and my date is July 27th.
>
> Are any of the following possible or likely:
>
> Dual or quad CUPS servers.
> Dual or quad UCCX servers.
> External LDAP
> External LCS/OCS
> SIP trunk provider for PSTN access from a site
>
> I need to remove things that are unlikely/improbable...
>
> After going thru CUPS, there had BETTER be an LDAP on the network.
>
>
>
> Jonathan





http://slash128.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 Lab 1A BR2 CUCME phone registration

[Vik Malhi]

I would use ³debug tftp events² for further clues. You will probably see one
or more files misssing.

-- 
Vik Malhi ­ CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com


Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.








From: Jo Knight 
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:33:22 +0300
To: OSL Group 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 Lab 1A BR2 CUCME phone registration

Hi,

I am running through Lab 1A and setup CUCME using the telephony-service
setup wizard.

It looked like my BR2 SCCP phone registered and then un-registered
immediately afterwards.

Jun 10 13:45:52.376: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 16: Name=SEP001BD4C6C136
Load=8.0(5.0) Last=CM-NAKed
Jun 10 13:45:52.376: %IPPHONE-6-REGISTER_NEW: ephone-1:SEP001BD4C6C136
IP:10.10.202.51 Socket:1 DeviceType:Phone has registered.
Jun 10 13:45:53.008: %IPPHONE-6-UNREGISTER_NORMAL: ephone-1:SEP001BD4C6C136
IP:10.10.202.51 Socket:1 DeviceType:Phone has unregistered normally.

Now when I run the setup command again after clearing the config I dont see
this registration happen again.

BR2-RTR#sh ephone reg

No ephone in specified type/condition.

The phone is picking up an IP from my DHCP scope which has been defined as:

ip dhcp pool BR2
   network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
   option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
   default-router 10.10.202.1

BR2-RTR#sh ip dhcp bind
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address  Client-ID/         Lease expiration    Type
            Hardware address/
            User name
10.10.202.51    0100.1bd4.c6c1.36   Jun 11 2009 04:32 PM   
Automatic

What is the best way to debug this to find out whats going on.

Thanks,
Jo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...

[Vik Malhi]

We hope to find answers to questions such as the ones within this thread at
Networkers in San Francisco in a couple of weeks- anybody else going?

---


Join IPexpert as we bring you up to the minute live coverage from Cisco
Networkers on Sunday, June 28th and Monday, June 29th. On Sunday we will be
tweeting, blogging, and posting emails to OSL live from the CCIE Voice
Technical Seminar (formerly called a Techtorial) and also from the CCIE
Routing and Switching Technical Seminar. On Monday we will be tweeting,
blogging, and posting emails to OSL live from the CCIE Security Technical
Seminar.

We will cover a wide range of topics and posts, but our main focus will be
to get you any specific information we learn of regarding changes that are
coming to 3.0 Voice and 4.0 R&S Lab Exams, and all specific information
regarding changes that have already occurred to the 3.0 Security Lab Exam.

In order to deliver the information to you ³live² and up-to-the-minute,
while at the same time not to overwhelming our IPexpert Blog or OSL readers
with a million little posts (slight exaggeration possibly), we will use the
following format to update our various media outlets:

* We will post every newsworthy update live to three twitter accounts,
one for each CCIE Track and Technical Seminar. This way if you want live
coverage, you can watch one of those feeds for the track you are studying
for, while not receiving unnecessary ancillary information about a CCIE
Track you may have no interest in.
* We will then every couple of hours update both our official IPexpert
Blog, and make a email post out to OnlineStudyList with a summation of what
we have learned thus far.
* If you wish to discuss any of the information posted to any of these
forums, please post your comments to the respective OnlineStudyList mailing
list for that track, and we will respond with replies. Also, if you have any
questions for the Presenter, please ask them through OnlineStudyList, and we
will be sure to ask them by-proxy. (You DO need to be subscribed to the
particular OnlineStudyList mailing list before posting to that email alias)

So the links to where all of the information will be posted is as follows:

CCIE Voice Track Technical Seminar:

* Live Twitter Feed: http://twitter.com/IPexpertVoice
* IPexpert Blog: http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/

 
-- 
Vik Malhi ­ CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com


Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.







> From: Michael Ciarfello 
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:13:06 -0400
> To: Jonathan Charles , OSL Group
> 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...
> 
> CUPS - the CCM 7 SRND and/or the CUP deployment guide has the number of
> servers.  There are multiple servers for redundancy or more capacity.
> 
> UCCX is 1 or 2.
> 
> LDAP is not difficult so I would say practice it.
> 
> SIP Trunk provider.  Why not?
> 
> I would jump off a bridge if LCS / OCS integration was on the test.  And that
> implies you are playing with the other team.
> 
> Yea, CUPS and these other applications are much easier and consistent with an
> external LDAP but not REQUIRED.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:45 AM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...
> 
> OK, I know this is getting tedious, but there is very little info out
> there and my date is July 27th.
> 
> Are any of the following possible or likely:
> 
> Dual or quad CUPS servers.
> Dual or quad UCCX servers.
> External LDAP
> External LCS/OCS
> SIP trunk provider for PSTN access from a site
> 
> I need to remove things that are unlikely/improbable...
> 
> After going thru CUPS, there had BETTER be an LDAP on the network.
> 
> 
> 
> Jonathan

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario

[Vik Malhi]

Can you try a few things to see if they help- let me know if you have
already done this.

(1) Enable Inbound Fast Start on your H323 trunk and see if that helps (on
UCM).

If that makes no difference:

(2) Change the codec to g711u between the SIP CME phone and UCM. Both the
outbound dial-peer and DP on the trunk should use g711u. Also in your voice
register pool you should have g711u configured- confirm this by ³show voice
register dial-peer².

If that makes no difference:

(3) Add a dspfarm xcoder on the HQ-RTR and place this into an MRG > MRGL
and assign to the DP of the trunk. Then check MTP Required.

I look forward to hearing back from you.


-- 
Vik Malhi ­ CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com


Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.








From: Aamir Panjwani 
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:55:57 +1000
To: Larry Hadrava , Otto Sanchez
, Mark Snow , Vik Malhi

Cc: OSL Group 
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario

Hi ipexpert,
 
We haven¹t had any feedback regarding this issue. Can someone please look
into it for us?
 
Thanks
 

From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 10:07 AM
To: Otto Sanchez; Mark Snow; Vik Malhi
Cc: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario
 

Otto:

Very interesting. Your debugs confirmed my suspicion about the signaling not
being carried properly.

 

I've copied Mark and Vik on this so you can the the scoop from the true
authorities:-)


Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer ­ IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Otto Sanchez 
wrote:

Hello,

I'm running into the exact same issue as Aamir does. If you make a debug
ccsip messages of such a call, you don't see any sip response back to the
cme sip phone when the call is answered at hq...,

I changed the signalling from h323 to sip and everything works just fine,

I was wondering if the reason why this call is failing is by the following
statement:

"SIP endpoints are not supported on H.323 trunks. SIP endpoints are
supported on SIP trunks only. "
source:cme config guide
http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guide/cm
ebasic.html

Any advice appreciated,

Otto




Mensaje original-
De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com en nombre de Aamir Panjwani
Enviado el: mar 26/05/2009 18:39
Para: Larry Hadrava
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Asunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario



Thanks for your response Larry. When I call from CME SIP to any phone in
HQ via gatekeeper it rings on HQ phone but when I lift the handset or
press answer soft key it stops ringing on HQ phone (but "answer" key is
still displayed on the HQ phone) and at the same time it is ringing on
calling phone (CME SIP) with "ring out" on the display for 3 rings and
then it eventually disconnects.  There is no VM setup involve and it
works fine without gatekeeper.



I have testing above in my own lab, however, I ran into exactly same
problem when I had a proctor lab session last Saturday. So calling from
CME SIP (XLite) to HQ SIP (CIPC) same problem. What is even more
interesting is when I loaded final config of lab 4A in which everything
meant to be working I still had a same problem! and yes I did "revert
entire pod" before loading final lab 4A



Many Thanks



From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 8:47 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario



Aamir:

So, from the description, when calling from the SIP phone, the call goes
through and you answer the call but the SIP device does not show as
connected? Does it keep ringing of does it eventually go to VM?

I'm just wondering where the problem is - on the calling or called end.
Sounds like that some supervisory signaling is not being passed
properly.



Are you doing this lab on a Proctor labs rack? Does this setup work
without the gatekeeper?



Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com 



On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Aamir Panjwani
 wrote:

Guys any idea regarding below issue please?



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir
Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, 26 May 2009 6:23 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario



Hi All,



As per lab 4A  I have

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRSTto Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

[Cristobal Priego]

thanks for the heads up, i thought something about it, however i didn't do
anything because we got this wav file from the cisco unified communications
manager music selections for MOH. i just check the file and is not on the
correct format

thanks

2009/6/10 Cliff McGlamry 

>  The file MUST be in the correct format.  Not any wav file will do!
>
> If you have a wav file you want to use, run it through the MOH translator
> in CCM 4.x, or use the Microsoft Sound Recorder and do a save as to get it
> into the correct format (CCITT U-law, 8khz x 8 bit mono).
>
>
>
>  *From:* Cristobal Priego 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2009 5:33 PM
> *To:* Cristi Radescu 
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco
> SRSTto Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource
>
> Cristian
>
> I enable multicast on 1 server only 239.1.1.1 port 16384, we are using
> audio source 1. i configured a region for the MOH servers only, so it will
> only use g711. the increment is per ip address
>
> If i issue a show ephone summary, it says that "no moh file loaded"
>
> under call-manager fallback i have
>
> ip source 10.11.21.1 port 2000
> moh BeStillMyLove.wav
> multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 10.11.21.1
>
> I have the following debugs enabled on the router
>
> ephone moh
> h245 asn
>
> when i place a call within the same location i get the beeps, however i
> don't see any output on the router for the debugs
>
> i can see on performance thatn a multicast session becomes active indeed.
> the same happens if i place a call between locations
>
> do you think the problem is with the audio file ?  should i try with a *.au
> file ?
>
> thanks
>
> 2009/6/10 Cristi Radescu 
>
>>  Hi Cristobal,
>>
>>
>>
>> Just a starting point in your debug:
>>
>> -  enable multicasting only on a server not both; if you will
>> have both you must configure different starting IP addresses on each server
>> and this will not work in Moh from flash scenario;
>>
>> -  239.1.1.1 is for audio source 1, codec g711u; make sure you
>> are using this one for MoH. If you have g729 between regions you should have
>> there 239.1.1.3 and G729 enabled for MoH in service parameters;
>>
>> -  also you can use „debug ephone moh” for debugging on router.
>>
>> -  Also in SRST condition, ip phones will receive only beeps.
>> PSTN phones will receive music.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>>
>> Cristian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Cristobal Priego
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:54 PM
>> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco
>> SRST to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> This is not related to a lab or a pod,  sometimes i use my customer's
>> networks to study
>>
>> I have centralized deployment, the cluster has 2 servers running CCM 7.x,
>> the MOH Servers are enabled for multicast, the ip address and port are
>> configured, the multicast increment is set to "Ip address"
>> On the selected audio source field on the option 1 (which is the MOH file
>> that we want to use) the hop count is set to 1
>> The MOH audio source has the box check for Allow multicasting.
>> I created an MRG that include both serves and is enabled for Multicast,
>> the MRGL has the Moh MRG. the MRGL is assigned to the phones and the remote
>> gateway. the phones have the user/network audio source selected to option 1
>> the remote gateway has the wav file loaded in flash.
>> the call-manager-fallback has the
>> ccm-manager music-on-hold
>> moh 
>> multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route > dedicated for voice>
>>
>> If I put a call on hold on the remote branch, the phone is not playing the
>> music from the local gateway. i get beeps
>> either internal or external calls. what am i missing?
>>
>> If i place a call internally i get the beeps, however in RTMT i can see
>> that a multicast request becomes active
>>
>> If i issue a show ccm-manager music-on-hold i don't see anything
>>
>> your help is greatly appreciated
>>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRSTto Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

[Cliff McGlamry]

The file MUST be in the correct format.  Not any wav file will do!

If you have a wav file you want to use, run it through the MOH translator in 
CCM 4.x, or use the Microsoft Sound Recorder and do a save as to get it into 
the correct format (CCITT U-law, 8khz x 8 bit mono).


  From: Cristobal Priego 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 5:33 PM
  To: Cristi Radescu 
  Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco 
SRSTto Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource


  Cristian

  I enable multicast on 1 server only 239.1.1.1 port 16384, we are using audio 
source 1. i configured a region for the MOH servers only, so it will only use 
g711. the increment is per ip address

  If i issue a show ephone summary, it says that "no moh file loaded"  

  under call-manager fallback i have

  ip source 10.11.21.1 port 2000
  moh BeStillMyLove.wav
  multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 10.11.21.1

  I have the following debugs enabled on the router

  ephone moh
  h245 asn

  when i place a call within the same location i get the beeps, however i don't 
see any output on the router for the debugs

  i can see on performance thatn a multicast session becomes active indeed.   
the same happens if i place a call between locations

  do you think the problem is with the audio file ?  should i try with a *.au 
file ?

  thanks


  2009/6/10 Cristi Radescu 

Hi Cristobal,



Just a starting point in your debug:

-  enable multicasting only on a server not both; if you will have 
both you must configure different starting IP addresses on each server and this 
will not work in Moh from flash scenario;

-  239.1.1.1 is for audio source 1, codec g711u; make sure you are 
using this one for MoH. If you have g729 between regions you should have there 
239.1.1.3 and G729 enabled for MoH in service parameters;

-  also you can use „debug ephone moh” for debugging on router.

-  Also in SRST condition, ip phones will receive only beeps. PSTN 
phones will receive music.



Hope this helps,

Cristian








From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:54 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to 
Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource



Hello Experts,

This is not related to a lab or a pod,  sometimes i use my customer's 
networks to study 

I have centralized deployment, the cluster has 2 servers running CCM 7.x, 
the MOH Servers are enabled for multicast, the ip address and port are 
configured, the multicast increment is set to "Ip address" 
On the selected audio source field on the option 1 (which is the MOH file 
that we want to use) the hop count is set to 1 
The MOH audio source has the box check for Allow multicasting. 
I created an MRG that include both serves and is enabled for Multicast, the 
MRGL has the Moh MRG. the MRGL is assigned to the phones and the remote 
gateway. the phones have the user/network audio source selected to option 1 
the remote gateway has the wav file loaded in flash. 
the call-manager-fallback has the 
ccm-manager music-on-hold
moh 
multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route  

If I put a call on hold on the remote branch, the phone is not playing the 
music from the local gateway. i get beeps 
either internal or external calls. what am i missing? 

If i place a call internally i get the beeps, however in RTMT i can see 
that a multicast request becomes active

If i issue a show ccm-manager music-on-hold i don't see anything

your help is greatly appreciated 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

[Cristobal Priego]

Cristian

I enable multicast on 1 server only 239.1.1.1 port 16384, we are using audio
source 1. i configured a region for the MOH servers only, so it will only
use g711. the increment is per ip address

If i issue a show ephone summary, it says that "no moh file loaded"

under call-manager fallback i have

ip source 10.11.21.1 port 2000
moh BeStillMyLove.wav
multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 10.11.21.1

I have the following debugs enabled on the router

ephone moh
h245 asn

when i place a call within the same location i get the beeps, however i
don't see any output on the router for the debugs

i can see on performance thatn a multicast session becomes active indeed.
the same happens if i place a call between locations

do you think the problem is with the audio file ?  should i try with a *.au
file ?

thanks

2009/6/10 Cristi Radescu 

>  Hi Cristobal,
>
>
>
> Just a starting point in your debug:
>
> -  enable multicasting only on a server not both; if you will have
> both you must configure different starting IP addresses on each server and
> this will not work in Moh from flash scenario;
>
> -  239.1.1.1 is for audio source 1, codec g711u; make sure you are
> using this one for MoH. If you have g729 between regions you should have
> there 239.1.1.3 and G729 enabled for MoH in service parameters;
>
> -  also you can use „debug ephone moh” for debugging on router.
>
> -  Also in SRST condition, ip phones will receive only beeps. PSTN
> phones will receive music.
>
>
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Cristian
>
>
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Cristobal Priego
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:54 PM
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST
> to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource
>
>
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> This is not related to a lab or a pod,  sometimes i use my customer's
> networks to study
>
> I have centralized deployment, the cluster has 2 servers running CCM 7.x,
> the MOH Servers are enabled for multicast, the ip address and port are
> configured, the multicast increment is set to "Ip address"
> On the selected audio source field on the option 1 (which is the MOH file
> that we want to use) the hop count is set to 1
> The MOH audio source has the box check for Allow multicasting.
> I created an MRG that include both serves and is enabled for Multicast, the
> MRGL has the Moh MRG. the MRGL is assigned to the phones and the remote
> gateway. the phones have the user/network audio source selected to option 1
> the remote gateway has the wav file loaded in flash.
> the call-manager-fallback has the
> ccm-manager music-on-hold
> moh 
> multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route  dedicated for voice>
>
> If I put a call on hold on the remote branch, the phone is not playing the
> music from the local gateway. i get beeps
> either internal or external calls. what am i missing?
>
> If i place a call internally i get the beeps, however in RTMT i can see
> that a multicast request becomes active
>
> If i issue a show ccm-manager music-on-hold i don't see anything
>
> your help is greatly appreciated
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

[Cristi Radescu]

Hi Cristobal,

Just a starting point in your debug:
-  enable multicasting only on a server not both; if you will have both 
you must configure different starting IP addresses on each server and this will 
not work in Moh from flash scenario;
-  239.1.1.1 is for audio source 1, codec g711u; make sure you are 
using this one for MoH. If you have g729 between regions you should have there 
239.1.1.3 and G729 enabled for MoH in service parameters;
-  also you can use "debug ephone moh" for debugging on router.
-  Also in SRST condition, ip phones will receive only beeps. PSTN 
phones will receive music.

Hope this helps,
Cristian



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:54 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use 
Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

Hello Experts,

This is not related to a lab or a pod,  sometimes i use my customer's networks 
to study

I have centralized deployment, the cluster has 2 servers running CCM 7.x, the 
MOH Servers are enabled for multicast, the ip address and port are configured, 
the multicast increment is set to "Ip address"
On the selected audio source field on the option 1 (which is the MOH file that 
we want to use) the hop count is set to 1
The MOH audio source has the box check for Allow multicasting.
I created an MRG that include both serves and is enabled for Multicast, the 
MRGL has the Moh MRG. the MRGL is assigned to the phones and the remote 
gateway. the phones have the user/network audio source selected to option 1
the remote gateway has the wav file loaded in flash.
the call-manager-fallback has the
ccm-manager music-on-hold
moh 
multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 

If I put a call on hold on the remote branch, the phone is not playing the 
music from the local gateway. i get beeps
either internal or external calls. what am i missing?

If i place a call internally i get the beeps, however in RTMT i can see that a 
multicast request becomes active

If i issue a show ccm-manager music-on-hold i don't see anything

your help is greatly appreciated

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC Presence statuses...

[Cristobal Priego]

that status is set through SIP.

make sure that the user is associated to the proper gateway profile. restart
the SIP Proxy.

I have CPUC integrated and it will let you know when you are on the phone,
idle, away, in a meeting, dnd

2009/6/9 Jonathan Charles 

> The primary extension is set.
>
> Both CUPC and the 7961 are associated to the user.
>
> The user is assigned to the DN on both devices.
>
> The user is listed as a UserID on both devices.
>
> CUPS is 7.0(2); CUCM is 7.0(1)
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Priyank Kiran
> wrote:
> > Make sure the setting for Primary Extension on the user page looks OK. If
> > both the softphone and deskphone share the same extension, you should be
> OK
> > after switching the application from softphone to deskphone.
> >
> > -Priyank
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Charles 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> OK, so we basically have three statuses...
> >>
> >> Available, green with a checkbox
> >>
> >> Idle, Yellow with a minus sign...
> >>
> >> and DND which is red with a slash
> >>
> >> How do we show that someone is on the phone? It appears to only work
> >> when I make the call using the softphone... (CUPC), but if I set CUPC
> >> to use the deskphone and make the call either thru the desk phone or
> >> thru CUPC, I do not show as on the phone from other users...
> >>
> >> Control of the phone from CUPC works fine... no probs at all...
> >>
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >
> >
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integrating Cisco CallManager and Cisco SRST to Use Cisco SRST As a Multicast MOH Resource

[Cristobal Priego]

Hello Experts,

This is not related to a lab or a pod,  sometimes i use my customer's
networks to study

I have centralized deployment, the cluster has 2 servers running CCM 7.x,
the MOH Servers are enabled for multicast, the ip address and port are
configured, the multicast increment is set to "Ip address"
On the selected audio source field on the option 1 (which is the MOH file
that we want to use) the hop count is set to 1
The MOH audio source has the box check for Allow multicasting.
I created an MRG that include both serves and is enabled for Multicast, the
MRGL has the Moh MRG. the MRGL is assigned to the phones and the remote
gateway. the phones have the user/network audio source selected to option 1
the remote gateway has the wav file loaded in flash.
the call-manager-fallback has the
ccm-manager music-on-hold
moh 
multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 

If I put a call on hold on the remote branch, the phone is not playing the
music from the local gateway. i get beeps
either internal or external calls. what am i missing?

If i place a call internally i get the beeps, however in RTMT i can see that
a multicast request becomes active

If i issue a show ccm-manager music-on-hold i don't see anything

your help is greatly appreciated

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Blocking CUPC clients from seeing presence of other CUPC clients...

[Cristobal Priego]

this is a global command, you disable IM for all of the users, or you enable
it for all of them. at this point you can't enable IM for only a few users
cheers

2009/6/9 Jonathan Charles 

> How do you block CUPC users from seeing other CUPC users?
>
> I have changed Presence Groups for user A and User B so they are
> disallowed subscriptions... I have changed SUBSCRIBE CSS to not
> include the partition of the other user... I even changed the LDAP
> profiles in CUPS so they couldn't see the other OU... and they can
> still see the presence status, still send/receive IMs...
>
> Now, once I changed the LDAP search base on CUPS, you can no longer
> search for the user and add em to your buddy list... but no presence
> info is blocked...
>
> How do you block this for CUPC?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unity vmware

[Thaya Nagarajah]

You could try this registry hack after you install the OS.
-Thaya NC

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ABIOLA ADEFILA
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 3:59 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unity vmware

Hello,

Does anyone know how i can get unity connection vmware to use for a lab setup

THanks for the anticipated response

Cheers
This attachment was removed.

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] XML PARSE ERROR

[Jeff Cotter]

I am receiving the following error when trying to access the IP Phone
Messenger Service.  (" XML PARSE ERROR") from 7960 SIP phone.  I believe it
may have to do with soft keys.  I see a similar bug on Cisco for accessing
Corporate Directory but this should have been fixed in updated firmware.

 

Phone is running Sip Firmware 8-12-0.  I have also tried 8-9-0 and 8-8-0
with the same results.  Call Manager and CUP are both on 7.0.  Works fine
with SCCP phones.Thank you.

 

 

Jeff Cotter

Director of Engineering/IT

Vox Network Solutions

650-989-1021

www.voxns.com

 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...

[Michael Ciarfello]

CUPS - the CCM 7 SRND and/or the CUP deployment guide has the number of 
servers.  There are multiple servers for redundancy or more capacity.

UCCX is 1 or 2.

LDAP is not difficult so I would say practice it.

SIP Trunk provider.  Why not?

I would jump off a bridge if LCS / OCS integration was on the test.  And that 
implies you are playing with the other team.

Yea, CUPS and these other applications are much easier and consistent with an 
external LDAP but not REQUIRED.


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:45 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...

OK, I know this is getting tedious, but there is very little info out
there and my date is July 27th.

Are any of the following possible or likely:

Dual or quad CUPS servers.
Dual or quad UCCX servers.
External LDAP
External LCS/OCS
SIP trunk provider for PSTN access from a site

I need to remove things that are unlikely/improbable...

After going thru CUPS, there had BETTER be an LDAP on the network.



Jonathan

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multidirectory ldap lookups

[Leslie Meade]

I got it fixed :)
You were right my attributes were not correct for the username

I worked it out by going here 

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb963907.aspx 

Cheers

Leslie

-Original Message-
From: Cliff McGlamry [mailto:cl...@mcglamry.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:25 AM
To: Leslie Meade; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multidirectory ldap lookups

Don't think your issue is with the code.  It's likely with the format of the 
credentials.  Often when dealing with LDAP, you have to put the credentials in 
the form of an AD specification.  Something like:

DN=Administrator,CN=Users,CN=Domain,CN=com

I've probably got the attributes confused (I always have to go to my notes 
which aren't currently available to me) to see which ones are CN and which are 
DN), but you get the idea.  You must do it this way if you're binding LDAP in 
CCM 6 or 7.

Cliff


--
From: "Leslie Meade" 
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 8:12 PM
To: ; 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multidirectory ldap lookups

I found out how to set it up and i have struck another issue.
When I do a search I get the XML Error [4]: Parse Error. I looked at the iis 
logs and get invalid credentials I am using the Multidirectory ASP file in the 
SDK from cisco. With this line

dirs[0] = new Directory("XX Directory", "10.1.X.X", "ou=XX group, ou=ipusers, 
ou=XXX", "389", "cn=XXX, ou=users, ou=XXX", "XXX", "");

This is the IIS error,

2009-06-10 00:04:35 W3SVC1 172.16.1.17 GET /CiscoIPServices/directory.asp
action=search&id=-1 80 - 172.16.1.70 Allegro-Software-WebClient/4.34 200 0 0 
2009-06-10 00:04:41 W3SVC1 172.16.1.17 GET /CiscoIPServices/directory.asp 
action=list&id=-1&f=s|180|800a0031|Invalid_credentials 80 - 172.16.1.70
Allegro-Software-WebClient/4.34 500 0 0


Can anyone shed some light on the reason I am getting invalid credentials, I 
have even gone as far as using the domain admin account and I get the same



Leslie 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on2phones

[Cliff McGlamry]

My understanding is that you are correct.  The answer thus far is no.

  From: Michael Ciarfello 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:44 PM
  To: Cliff McGlamry ; Cristi Radescu ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
  Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on2phones


  Did this ever get solved?  Am I correct in saying the answer so far is NO?


--
  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry 
[cl...@mcglamry.net]
  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:47 PM
  To: Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones


  Actually, you might be able to do it if it is on CME.

  Assign button 2 as an overlay, and put the mailbox number DN on the overlay 
ephone-dn.  It should be hard forwarded so it will never ring, but I bet that 
would make the envelope appear the way being discussed.  

From: Cristi Radescu 
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:22 AM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 
2phones




I think this is not possible. With „secondary number” or „overlay” it will 
not work.






From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David Corbeil
Sent: 27 May, 2009 8:42 PM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2 phones



Hi,



I want to know if it’s possible to have the voicemail letter on the second 
line of 2 phones without changing the phone facing.



Example:



Phone 1

Line1 : 3001

Line2 : 3101



Phone 2

Line1 : 3002

Line2 : 3102



Each line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when a message is left on 
GDM I need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone.

Can’t have line 3

Can’t modify the look of the phone



It’s possible? If yes, how ?



Thanks

David Corbeil 
Consultant en technologie | Technology Consultant 
Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333 
Membre de l’équipe TELUS 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multidirectory ldap lookups

[Cliff McGlamry]

Don't think your issue is with the code.  It's likely with the format of the 
credentials.  Often when dealing with LDAP, you have to put the credentials 
in the form of an AD specification.  Something like:

DN=Administrator,CN=Users,CN=Domain,CN=com

I've probably got the attributes confused (I always have to go to my notes 
which aren't currently available to me) to see which ones are CN and which 
are DN), but you get the idea.  You must do it this way if you're binding 
LDAP in CCM 6 or 7.

Cliff


--
From: "Leslie Meade" 
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 8:12 PM
To: ; 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multidirectory ldap lookups

I found out how to set it up and i have struck another issue.
When I do a search I get the XML Error [4]: Parse Error. I looked at the iis 
logs and get invalid credentials
I am using the Multidirectory ASP file in the SDK from cisco. With this line

dirs[0] = new Directory("XX Directory", "10.1.X.X", "ou=XX group, 
ou=ipusers, ou=XXX", "389", "cn=XXX, ou=users, ou=XXX", "XXX", "");

This is the IIS error,

2009-06-10 00:04:35 W3SVC1 172.16.1.17 GET /CiscoIPServices/directory.asp 
action=search&id=-1 80 - 172.16.1.70 Allegro-Software-WebClient/4.34 200 0 0
2009-06-10 00:04:41 W3SVC1 172.16.1.17 GET /CiscoIPServices/directory.asp 
action=list&id=-1&f=s|180|800a0031|Invalid_credentials 80 - 172.16.1.70 
Allegro-Software-WebClient/4.34 500 0 0


Can anyone shed some light on the reason I am getting invalid credentials, I 
have even gone as far as using the domain admin account and I get the same



Leslie 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

[Larry Hadrava]

Well, I guess this confirms it - we are nerds!!!
( Network Emergency Repair Dudes )

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jason Granat  wrote:

>  Mark,
>
>
>
> I appreciate the ‘echo’ back to the mailing list. I just need to make sure
> I have ‘logging synchronous’ enabled so my thought train doesn’t get
> derailed as these messages pop in. Also, ‘ip tcp synwait-time 5’ helps me
> from getting hung up waiting too long for an update…
>
>
>
> Your humor does not fall on deaf ears J
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Snow
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:36 AM
> *To:* Aamir Panjwani
>
> *Cc:* OSL Group; Phillip Smith
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6
>
>
>
> Hi Aamir,
>
>
>
> We would love to release them lab-by-lab, and in most cases moving forward
> that is what we will continue doing, just as we have done in the past.
>
> However for this latest round of labs, we found some efficiencies in doing
> many of the labs somewhat bulked together.
>
> So, to that end, that is how you will see these next few Volume 1 Labs
> released, in bulk lab sections.
>
> To be clear, in the next two weeks, you will be seeing multiple labs
> released each time an announcement is made, which should be multiple times
> per week.
>
>
>
>
>
> Also to answer Jonathan's question (or statement meant to be a question I
> assume :):
>
>
>
> "I have a lab date of July 27th, so, to confirm, there will be a
>
> complete set of labs (testing all components of the blueprint) by 30
> JUNE."
>
>
>
> I will say, Yes Jonathan, well before July 27 you will have not only the
> rest of the Volume 1 labs, but at least 2 full Mock Labs with Solutions in
> your account!
>
> (If you are a paid member - J/K - I know you are :P  )
>
>
>
>
>
> Watch the blog today for some cool announcements.
>
> I will also post them here in the same way an MGCP GW who is backhauling
> Q931 back to UCM, allows local router debugs such as 'debug isdn q931'.
>
> That was a very lame attempt at humor to say that I will also "echo" them
> here to the local terminal - or mailing list.
>
>
>
> Oh well - no more jokes for me - that was my time, tip your waitresses on
> your way out, and drive safe.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mark Snow
>
> CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
>
>
>
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
>
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>
> Fax: +1.309.413.4097
>
> Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
>
> --
>
> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities 
>
> --
>
> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
> Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
> R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 7:43 PM, Aamir Panjwani wrote:
>
>
>
>   As per latest newsletter all 13 labs will be released on 30th June.
> Which is great, however, my understanding was that labs will be released one
> by one as they are being developed. It would be really helpful if possible
> to release lab 6,7 etc. now so we don’t have to wait for another 3 weeks for
> full volume 1 to be published.
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> ] *On Behalf Of *Larry Hadrava
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 June 2009 9:34 AM
> *To:* Nara Shikamaru
> *Cc:* OSL Group; Phillip Smith
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6
>
>
>
> I'm checking on this for you.
>
>
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com 
>
>
>  On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Nara Shikamaru 
> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know when module 6 for the new lab exam is being released?  I
> was under the impression that the 13 modules were going to be released in
> time for the July release of the lab?  Has this changed?
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>
>
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://slash128.com
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

[Jason Granat]

Mark,

I appreciate the 'echo' back to the mailing list. I just need to make sure I 
have 'logging synchronous' enabled so my thought train doesn't get derailed as 
these messages pop in. Also, 'ip tcp synwait-time 5' helps me from getting hung 
up waiting too long for an update...

Your humor does not fall on deaf ears :)

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:36 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: OSL Group; Phillip Smith
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

Hi Aamir,

We would love to release them lab-by-lab, and in most cases moving forward that 
is what we will continue doing, just as we have done in the past.
However for this latest round of labs, we found some efficiencies in doing many 
of the labs somewhat bulked together.
So, to that end, that is how you will see these next few Volume 1 Labs 
released, in bulk lab sections.
To be clear, in the next two weeks, you will be seeing multiple labs released 
each time an announcement is made, which should be multiple times per week.


Also to answer Jonathan's question (or statement meant to be a question I 
assume :):

"I have a lab date of July 27th, so, to confirm, there will be a
complete set of labs (testing all components of the blueprint) by 30
JUNE."

I will say, Yes Jonathan, well before July 27 you will have not only the rest 
of the Volume 1 labs, but at least 2 full Mock Labs with Solutions in your 
account!
(If you are a paid member - J/K - I know you are :P  )


Watch the blog today for some cool announcements.
I will also post them here in the same way an MGCP GW who is backhauling Q931 
back to UCM, allows local router debugs such as 'debug isdn q931'.
That was a very lame attempt at humor to say that I will also "echo" them here 
to the local terminal - or mailing list.

Oh well - no more jokes for me - that was my time, tip your waitresses on your 
way out, and drive safe.


--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
--
Join our free online support and peer group communities: 
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
--
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand 
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE 
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab 
Certifications.
--




On Jun 9, 2009, at 7:43 PM, Aamir Panjwani wrote:


As per latest newsletter all 13 labs will be released on 30th June. Which is 
great, however, my understanding was that labs will be released one by one as 
they are being developed. It would be really helpful if possible to release lab 
6,7 etc. now so we don't have to wait for another 3 weeks for full volume 1 to 
be published.

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Larry Hadrava
Sent: Wednesday, 10 June 2009 9:34 AM
To: Nara Shikamaru
Cc: OSL Group; Phillip Smith
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

I'm checking on this for you.

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Nara Shikamaru 
mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com>> wrote:
Does anyone know when module 6 for the new lab exam is being released?  I was 
under the impression that the 13 modules were going to be released in time for 
the July release of the lab?  Has this changed?

--
-Shikamaru


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__





http://slash128.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but I was very very close to the lab

[Darby Weaver]

It is my interpretation that:

1. He was referring to materials that are dumps as well as legitimate
materials.

2. He was offering to share copyright materials.


Any other interpretation?  Please read his comments again.



On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Mark Snow  wrote:

> Yep - you got it. We don't want to devaluate our certification that we have
> all worked (or are working) so hard to get.
>
>
> If anyone feels the need to reply to this thread - take Vishal's email
> address out of the reply. I don't want him 'getting' anymore email addresses
> to be able to harass folks with.
>
>
> Cheers all,
>
> --
> Mark Snow
> CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
>
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.309.413.4097
> Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
> --
> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities 
> --
> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
> Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
> R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
> --
>
>
>
>
>   On Jun 10, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Dennis DeFoort wrote:
>
>   That wasn’t my interpretation of his comments. I did and do think he was
> referring to the practice labs we all do on various sites. If he is outright
> cheating I too have issues.
>
>
> Seems I am always “fixing things” that paper qualified people have setup.
>
> Dennis
>
>  --
>  *From:* Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com ]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:43 AM
> *To:* Dennis DeFoort
> *Cc:* Mark Snow; vishal batra; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but i was very very close
> to the lab
>
>  Dennis:
>  We do not condone cheating in any form.
>  This fellow obviously is into cheating and not worried about breaking
> NDA. He basically said buy these "real labs" and confirmed that they are
> real and even told what version of the lab he and his friend got in their
> lab.
>  Plus he is offering to distribute lab material that is copyrighted
> material.
>
>  We cannot and will not tolerate this type of blatant disregard for the
> certification on our boards.
>
>  Mark can add to this if need be.
>
>
> Thanks
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com 
>
>  On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Dennis DeFoort 
> wrote:
>
> Ahh ok why?
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Snow
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:30 AM
> *To:* vishal batra
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck,but i was very very close
> to the lab
>
>
>
> Banned.
>
>
> --
>
> Mark Snow
>
> CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
>
>
>
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
>
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>
> Fax: +1.309.413.4097
>
> Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
>
> --
>
> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities 
>
> --
>
> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
> Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
> R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:20 AM, vishal batra wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family,
> friends and every our loved one.
>
>
>
> It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real stuff
> to pass the lab and this is really really fact.
>
>
>
> If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start forgetting
> the starting labs.
>
>
>
> What i understand is we really need a practise practise / understanding
> to clearing the lab.
>
>
>
> I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they would
> have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me to even get
> so close to the lab.
>
>
>
> I have done some mistake which has taken my lab
>
>
>
> I was practising since last 1 year
>
>
>
> I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs
>
>
>
> I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.
>
>
>
> Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the support from
> everyone, Now we will see on ver 3
>
>
>
> I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone want it :)
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Vishal
>
>
>
>
> "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and
> may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.1.2 7960 SIP Registration Rejected

[Jason Granat]

This actually wound up being a bone-headed mistake on my part. I intentionally 
had upgraded the pub but not the sub. I thought I configured DHCP on the pub 
and had option 150 pointing at the pub. Turns out I forgot I had DHCP running 
on the router that the SIP phone was connected to and was still pointing to the 
sub. That's why the SIP phone was getting rejected. After I fixed option 150 to 
point to the pub the 7960 successfully registered as a SIP phone to the pub 
running 7.1.2.

I have since rolled back to 7.0, since that is what is on the blueprint, so I 
didn't spend a lot of time playing with 7.1.2. The only major thing I saw in 
the short time it was up was that the server pauses during every reboot and 
makes you accept a disclaimer at the console that it is running on VMWare. Of 
course I would imagine this isn't an issue on real hardware.

The only other minor thing I noticed was the addition of geo locations.

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:13 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.1.2 7960 SIP Registration Rejected

Seen anything weird with 7.1?

Was debating on upgrading our development gear... just to screw with
the UCCX guys


Jonathan

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
> Since it appears the OSL mailer is back online I wanted to share that this
> was a simple boneheaded mistake. During my upgrade haste I forgot to reset
> my DHCP option 150 and the phones were trying to register with the sub that
> had not yet been upgraded. Anyway, I was able to register my 7960 phones as
> SIP endpoints with 7.1.2.
> Hope my mistake was helpful to someone :-)
>
> On Jun 6, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Jason Granat wrote:
>
> I upgraded to CUCM 7.1.2 yesterday and my 7960's that were previously
> registered as SIP endpoints in 7.0 are now getting registration rejected. I
> tried reverting back to Skinny (which worked) and back to SIP and also tried
> adding new 7960's as SIP but still get reg rej. Does anyone know if there is
> an incompatibility with 7960's as SIP endpoints in 7.1.2?
>
> A note on 7.1.2 on VMWare: every reboot the system will pause during the
> boot cycle to warn that it detects VMWare and you must agree that it is not
> a production system, so you can't just reboot and wait for it to come up.
> You have to agree every time.
> 
>
> http://slash128.com
>
>
> 
>
> http://slash128.com
>



http://slash128.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 40, Issue 48

[Kamran Ahsanullah]

pport and peer group communities:
> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
>
> --
>
> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
> Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco
> CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice
> Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:20 AM, vishal batra wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family,
> friends and every our loved one.
>
>
>
> It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real
> stuff to pass the lab and this is really really fact.
>
>
>
> If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start
> forgetting the starting labs.
>
>
>
> What i understand is we really need a practise practise / understanding
> to clearing the lab.
>
>
>
> I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they would
> have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me to even
> get so close to the lab.
>
>
>
> I have done some mistake which has taken my lab
>
>
>
> I was practising since last 1 year
>
>
>
> I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs
>
>
>
> I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.
>
>
>
> Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the support
> from everyone, Now we will see on ver 3
>
>
>
> I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone want it
> :)
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Vishal
>
>
>
>
>
> "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient
> and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not
> the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of
> the information included in this message and any attachments is
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this
> message and any attachments. Thank you." ''Ce message et tous les
> documents joints sont ? l'attention exclusive du destinataire de ce
> message et peuvent contenir de l'information confidentielle ou
> privil?gi?e. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire vis?, toute divulgation,
> copie, utilisation ou distribution de l'information contenue dans ce
> message et les documents joints est interdite. Si vous avez re?u ce
> message par erreur, veuillez nous le faire savoir par courriel
> imm?diatement et supprimer de fa?on permanente ce message et les
> documents joints. Merci.''
>
>
>
>
> "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and
> may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the
> information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply
> e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any
> attachments. Thank you."
>
>
> ''Ce message et tous les documents joints sont ? l'attention exclusive du
> destinataire de ce message et peuvent contenir de l'information
> confidentielle ou privil?gi?e. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire vis?,
> toute divulgation, copie, utilisation ou distribution de l'information
> contenue dans ce message et les documents joints est interdite. Si vous avez
> re?u ce message par erreur, veuillez nous le faire savoir par courriel
> imm?diatement et supprimer de fa?on permanente ce message et les documents
> joints. Merci.''
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090610/bd7d1746/attachment.htm
>
> --
>
> ___
> CCIE_Voice mailing list
> CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>
>
> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 40, Issue 48
> **
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 Lab 1A BR2 CUCME phone registration

[Jo Knight]

Hi,

I am running through Lab 1A and setup CUCME using the telephony-service
setup wizard.

It looked like my BR2 SCCP phone registered and then un-registered
immediately afterwards.

Jun 10 13:45:52.376: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 16: Name=SEP001BD4C6C136
Load=8.0(5.0) Last=CM-NAKed
Jun 10 13:45:52.376: %IPPHONE-6-REGISTER_NEW: ephone-1:SEP001BD4C6C136
IP:10.10.202.51 Socket:1 DeviceType:Phone has registered.
Jun 10 13:45:53.008: %IPPHONE-6-UNREGISTER_NORMAL: ephone-1:SEP001BD4C6C136
IP:10.10.202.51 Socket:1 DeviceType:Phone has unregistered normally.

Now when I run the setup command again after clearing the config I dont see
this registration happen again.

BR2-RTR#sh ephone reg

No ephone in specified type/condition.

The phone is picking up an IP from my DHCP scope which has been defined as:

ip dhcp pool BR2
   network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
   option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
   default-router 10.10.202.1

BR2-RTR#sh ip dhcp bind
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address  Client-ID/ Lease expirationType
Hardware address/
User name
10.10.202.510100.1bd4.c6c1.36   Jun 11 2009 04:32 PM
Automatic

What is the best way to debug this to find out whats going on.

Thanks,
Jo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

[Mark Snow]

Hi Aamir,

We would love to release them lab-by-lab, and in most cases moving  
forward that is what we will continue doing, just as we have done in  
the past.
However for this latest round of labs, we found some efficiencies in  
doing many of the labs somewhat bulked together.
So, to that end, that is how you will see these next few Volume 1 Labs  
released, in bulk lab sections.
To be clear, in the next two weeks, you will be seeing multiple labs  
released each time an announcement is made, which should be multiple  
times per week.



Also to answer Jonathan's question (or statement meant to be a  
question I assume :):


"I have a lab date of July 27th, so, to confirm, there will be a
complete set of labs (testing all components of the blueprint) by 30
JUNE."

I will say, Yes Jonathan, well before July 27 you will have not only  
the rest of the Volume 1 labs, but at least 2 full Mock Labs with  
Solutions in your account!

(If you are a paid member - J/K - I know you are :P  )


Watch the blog today for some cool announcements.
I will also post them here in the same way an MGCP GW who is  
backhauling Q931 back to UCM, allows local router debugs such as  
'debug isdn q931'.
That was a very lame attempt at humor to say that I will also "echo"  
them here to the local terminal - or mailing list.


Oh well - no more jokes for me - that was my time, tip your waitresses  
on your way out, and drive safe.



--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
--
Join our free online support and peer group communities: 
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
--
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On- 
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S  
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and  
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.

--




On Jun 9, 2009, at 7:43 PM, Aamir Panjwani wrote:

As per latest newsletter all 13 labs will be released on 30th June.  
Which is great, however, my understanding was that labs will be  
released one by one as they are being developed. It would be really  
helpful if possible to release lab 6,7 etc. now so we don’t have to  
wait for another 3 weeks for full volume 1 to be published.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
] On Behalf Of Larry Hadrava

Sent: Wednesday, 10 June 2009 9:34 AM
To: Nara Shikamaru
Cc: OSL Group; Phillip Smith
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

I'm checking on this for you.

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Nara Shikamaru  
 wrote:
Does anyone know when module 6 for the new lab exam is being  
released?  I was under the impression that the 13 modules were going  
to be released in time for the July release of the lab?  Has this  
changed?


--
-Shikamaru


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but i was very very close to the lab

[Dennis DeFoort]

You really need to read this again with an open mind. 

 

Hi,

 

It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family,
friends and every our loved one.

FLUFF

 

It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real
stuff to pass the lab and this is really really fact.

 True

If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start
forgetting the starting labs.

 TRUE

What i understand is we really need a practise practise / understanding
to clearing the lab.

 TRUE

I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they would
have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me to even
get so close to the lab.

 TRUE

I have done some mistake which has taken my lab

 Been there

I was practising since last 1 year

 DID THAT

I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs

 Me too

I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.

 Used my own

Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the support
from everyone, Now we will see on ver 3

 I agree

 

I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone want it
:)

Is this the line you have issues with?

 



From: Mark Snow [mailto:ms...@ipexpert.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:48 AM
To: Dennis DeFoort
Cc: vishal batra; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck,but i was very very close
to the lab

 

Are you serious??

Umm because he is pushing a product that is in direct violation of the
Cisco CCIE NDA rules - that's why.


-- 

Mark Snow

CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

 

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

 

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Fax: +1.309.413.4097

Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com

--

Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

--

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco
CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice
Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.

--

 

 

 

 

On Jun 10, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Dennis DeFoort wrote:





Ahh ok why?

 



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:30 AM
To: vishal batra
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck,but i was very very close
to the lab

 

Banned.


-- 

Mark Snow

CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

 

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

 

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Fax: +1.309.413.4097

Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com

--

Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

--

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco
CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice
Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.

--

 

 

 

 

On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:20 AM, vishal batra wrote:






Hi,

 

It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family,
friends and every our loved one.

 

It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real
stuff to pass the lab and this is really really fact.

 

If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start
forgetting the starting labs.

 

What i understand is we really need a practise practise / understanding
to clearing the lab.

 

I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they would
have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me to even
get so close to the lab.

 

I have done some mistake which has taken my lab

 

I was practising since last 1 year

 

I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs

 

I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.

 

Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the support
from everyone, Now we will see on ver 3

 

I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone want it
:)

 

Regards

Vishal

 

 

"This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient
and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of
the information included in this message and any attachments is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this
message and any attachments. Thank you." ''Ce message et tous les
documents joints sont ? l'attention exclusive du destinataire de ce
message et peuvent contenir de l'information confidentielle ou
privil?gi?e. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire vis?, toute divulgation,
copie, utilisation ou distribution de l'information contenue dans ce
message et les documents joints est interdite. S

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but I was very very close to the lab

[Mark Snow]

Yep - you got it. We don't want to devaluate our certification that we  
have all worked (or are working) so hard to get.



If anyone feels the need to reply to this thread - take Vishal's email  
address out of the reply. I don't want him 'getting' anymore email  
addresses to be able to harass folks with.



Cheers all,

--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
--
Join our free online support and peer group communities: 
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
--
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On- 
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S  
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and  
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.

--




On Jun 10, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Dennis DeFoort wrote:

That wasn’t my interpretation of his comments. I did and do think he  
was referring to the practice labs we all do on various sites. If he  
is outright cheating I too have issues.



Seems I am always “fixing things” that paper qualified people have  
setup.


Dennis

From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:43 AM
To: Dennis DeFoort
Cc: Mark Snow; vishal batra; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but i was very very  
close to the lab


Dennis:
We do not condone cheating in any form.
This fellow obviously is into cheating and not worried about  
breaking NDA. He basically said buy these "real labs" and confirmed  
that they are real and even told what version of the lab he and his  
friend got in their lab.
Plus he is offering to distribute lab material that is copyrighted  
material.


We cannot and will not tolerate this type of blatant disregard for  
the certification on our boards.


Mark can add to this if need be.

Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Dennis DeFoort > wrote:

Ahh ok why?



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
] On Behalf Of Mark Snow

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:30 AM
To: vishal batra
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck,but i was very very  
close to the lab




Banned.


--

Mark Snow

CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)



Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.



Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Fax: +1.309.413.4097

Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com

--

Join our free online support and peer group communities: 
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

--

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video- 
On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE  
R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice  
Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.


--









On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:20 AM, vishal batra wrote:



Hi,



It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our  
family, friends and every our loved one.




It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real  
stuff to pass the lab and this is really really fact.




If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start  
forgetting the starting labs.




What i understand is we really need a practise practise /  
understanding to clearing the lab.




I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they  
would have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me  
to even get so close to the lab.




I have done some mistake which has taken my lab



I was practising since last 1 year



I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs



I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.



Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the  
support from everyone, Now we will see on ver 3




I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone  
want it :)




Regards

Vishal





"This message and any attachments are solely for the intended  
recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If  
you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or  
distribution of the information included in this message and any  
attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication  
in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and  
permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you."  
''Ce message et tous les documents joints sont ? l'attention  
exclusive du destinataire de ce message et peuvent contenir de  
l'information confidentielle ou privil?gi?e. Si vous n'?tes pas le  
destinataire vis?, toute divulgation, copie, utilisation ou  
distribution de l'information contenue dans ce message et les  
documents joints est interdite. Si vous avez re?u ce message par  
erreur, veuillez nous le faire savoir par courriel imm?diatement e

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but i was very very close to the lab

[Mark Snow]

Are you serious??
Umm because he is pushing a product that is in direct violation of the  
Cisco CCIE NDA rules - that's why.


--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
--
Join our free online support and peer group communities: 
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
--
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On- 
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S  
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and  
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.

--




On Jun 10, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Dennis DeFoort wrote:


Ahh ok why?

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
] On Behalf Of Mark Snow

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:30 AM
To: vishal batra
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck,but i was very very  
close to the lab


Banned.

--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
--
Join our free online support and peer group communities: 
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
--
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video- 
On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE  
R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice  
Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.

--




On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:20 AM, vishal batra wrote:


Hi,

It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our  
family, friends and every our loved one.


It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real  
stuff to pass the lab and this is really really fact.


If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start  
forgetting the starting labs.


What i understand is we really need a practise practise /  
understanding to clearing the lab.


I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they  
would have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me  
to even get so close to the lab.


I have done some mistake which has taken my lab

I was practising since last 1 year

I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs

I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.

Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the  
support from everyone, Now we will see on ver 3


I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone  
want it :)


Regards
Vishal


"This message and any attachments are solely for the intended  
recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If  
you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or  
distribution of the information included in this message and any  
attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication  
in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and  
permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you."  
''Ce message et tous les documents joints sont ? l'attention  
exclusive du destinataire de ce message et peuvent contenir de  
l'information confidentielle ou privil?gi?e. Si vous n'?tes pas le  
destinataire vis?, toute divulgation, copie, utilisation ou  
distribution de l'information contenue dans ce message et les  
documents joints est interdite. Si vous avez re?u ce message par  
erreur, veuillez nous le faire savoir par courriel imm?diatement et  
supprimer de fa?on permanente ce message et les documents joints.  
Merci.''

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but I was very very close to the lab

[Dennis DeFoort]

That wasn't my interpretation of his comments. I did and do think he was
referring to the practice labs we all do on various sites. If he is
outright cheating I too have issues. 

 

 

Seems I am always "fixing things" that paper qualified people have
setup.

 

Dennis

 



From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:43 AM
To: Dennis DeFoort
Cc: Mark Snow; vishal batra; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but i was very very close
to the lab

 

Dennis:

We do not condone cheating in any form. 

This fellow obviously is into cheating and not worried about breaking
NDA. He basically said buy these "real labs" and confirmed that they are
real and even told what version of the lab he and his friend got in
their lab.

Plus he is offering to distribute lab material that is copyrighted
material.

 

We cannot and will not tolerate this type of blatant disregard for the
certification on our boards. 

 

Mark can add to this if need be.

 

Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com



On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Dennis DeFoort 
wrote:

Ahh ok why?

 



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:30 AM
To: vishal batra
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck,but i was very very close
to the lab

 

Banned.


-- 

Mark Snow

CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

 

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

 

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Fax: +1.309.413.4097

Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com

--

Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

--

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco
CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice
Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.

--

 

 

 

 

On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:20 AM, vishal batra wrote:

 

Hi,

 

It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family,
friends and every our loved one.

 

It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real
stuff to pass the lab and this is really really fact.

 

If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start
forgetting the starting labs.

 

What i understand is we really need a practise practise / understanding
to clearing the lab.

 

I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they would
have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me to even
get so close to the lab. 

 

I have done some mistake which has taken my lab

 

I was practising since last 1 year 

 

I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs

 

I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.

 

Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the support
from everyone, Now we will see on ver 3

 

I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone want it
:) 

 

Regards

Vishal

 

 

"This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient
and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of
the information included in this message and any attachments is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this
message and any attachments. Thank you." ''Ce message et tous les
documents joints sont ? l'attention exclusive du destinataire de ce
message et peuvent contenir de l'information confidentielle ou
privil?gi?e. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire vis?, toute divulgation,
copie, utilisation ou distribution de l'information contenue dans ce
message et les documents joints est interdite. Si vous avez re?u ce
message par erreur, veuillez nous le faire savoir par courriel
imm?diatement et supprimer de fa?on permanente ce message et les
documents joints. Merci.'' 

 


"This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may 
contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information 
included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and 
immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you."


''Ce message et tous les documents joints sont ? l'attention exclusive du 
destinataire de ce message et peuvent contenir de l'information confidentielle 
ou privil?gi?e. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire vis?, toute divulgation, 
copie, utilisation ou distribution de l'information contenue dans ce message et

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but i was very very close to the lab

[Larry Hadrava]

Dennis:
We do not condone cheating in any form.
This fellow obviously is into cheating and not worried about breaking NDA.
He basically said buy these "real labs" and confirmed that they are real and
even told what version of the lab he and his friend got in their lab.
Plus he is offering to distribute lab material that is copyrighted material.

We cannot and will not tolerate this type of blatant disregard for the
certification on our boards.

Mark can add to this if need be.

Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Dennis DeFoort wrote:

>  Ahh ok why?
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Snow
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:30 AM
> *To:* vishal batra
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck,but i was very very close
> to the lab
>
>
>
> Banned.
>
>
> --
>
> Mark Snow
>
> CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
>
>
>
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
>
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>
> Fax: +1.309.413.4097
>
> Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
>
> --
>
> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities 
>
> --
>
> IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
> Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
> R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:20 AM, vishal batra wrote:
>
>
>
>  Hi,
>
>
>
> It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family,
> friends and every our loved one.
>
>
>
> It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real stuff
> to pass the lab and this is really really fact.
>
>
>
> If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start forgetting
> the starting labs.
>
>
>
> What i understand is we really need a practise practise / understanding
> to clearing the lab.
>
>
>
> I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they would
> have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me to even get
> so close to the lab.
>
>
>
> I have done some mistake which has taken my lab
>
>
>
> I was practising since last 1 year
>
>
>
> I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs
>
>
>
> I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.
>
>
>
> Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the support from
> everyone, Now we will see on ver 3
>
>
>
> I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone want it :)
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Vishal
>
>
>
>
> "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and
> may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the
> information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply
> e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any
> attachments. Thank you." ''Ce message et tous les documents joints sont ?
> l'attention exclusive du destinataire de ce message et peuvent contenir de
> l'information confidentielle ou privil?gi?e. Si vous n'?tes pas le
> destinataire vis?, toute divulgation, copie, utilisation ou distribution de
> l'information contenue dans ce message et les documents joints est
> interdite. Si vous avez re?u ce message par erreur, veuillez nous le faire
> savoir par courriel imm?diatement et supprimer de fa?on permanente ce
> message et les documents joints. Merci.''

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but i was very very close to the lab

[Larry Hadrava]

Sir:
So you think that the only way to pass the lab is to have a copy of the
"actual" test that you will get ahead of time?

Following that line of thinking the only to make the right decisions on a
real world design would to have it already designed by someone else and then
you present it as your own?

I guess this might be true for some. But for those that are actually taking
the time to LEARN the technologies, practice the technologies and learn and
practice over and over until they know and UNDERSTAND each and every click
of the mouse and every command that is entered via the CLI.

That is what becoming a CCIE takes. This what the workplace demands - that a
CCIE can act as a subject matter expert in the given area of expertise.

I wish you the best of luck with you studies and hope that you will take the
time to actually learn the technologies and be able to perform at the level
of the CCIE that you earn.

Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:20 AM, vishal batra  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family,
> friends and every our loved one.
>
> It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real stuff
> to pass the lab and this is really really fact.
>
> If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start forgetting
> the starting labs.
>
> What i understand is we really need a practise practise / understanding
> to clearing the lab.
>
> I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they would
> have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me to even get
> so close to the lab.
>
> I have done some mistake which has taken my lab
>
> I was practising since last 1 year
>
> I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs
>
> I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.
>
> Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the support from
> everyone, Now we will see on ver 3
>
> I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone want it :)
>
>
> Regards
> Vishal
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but i was very very close to the lab

[Dennis DeFoort]

Ahh ok why?

 



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:30 AM
To: vishal batra
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck,but i was very very close
to the lab

 

Banned.


-- 

Mark Snow

CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

 

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

 

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Fax: +1.309.413.4097

Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com

--

Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

--

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco
CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice
Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.

--

 

 

 

 

On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:20 AM, vishal batra wrote:





Hi,

 

It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family,
friends and every our loved one.

 

It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real
stuff to pass the lab and this is really really fact.

 

If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start
forgetting the starting labs.

 

What i understand is we really need a practise practise / understanding
to clearing the lab.

 

I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they would
have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me to even
get so close to the lab. 

 

I have done some mistake which has taken my lab

 

I was practising since last 1 year 

 

I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs

 

I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.

 

Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the support
from everyone, Now we will see on ver 3

 

I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone want it
:) 

 

Regards

Vishal

 

 


"This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may 
contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information 
included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and 
immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you."


''Ce message et tous les documents joints sont ? l'attention exclusive du 
destinataire de ce message et peuvent contenir de l'information confidentielle 
ou privil?gi?e. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire vis?, toute divulgation, 
copie, utilisation ou distribution de l'information contenue dans ce message et 
les documents joints est interdite. Si vous avez re?u ce message par erreur, 
veuillez nous le faire savoir par courriel imm?diatement et supprimer de fa?on 
permanente ce message et les documents joints. Merci.''

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but i was very very close to the lab

[Mark Snow]

Banned.

--  
Mark Snow

CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
--
Join our free online support and peer group communities: 
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
--
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On- 
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S  
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and  
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.

--




On Jun 10, 2009, at 3:20 AM, vishal batra wrote:


Hi,

It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our  
family, friends and every our loved one.


It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real  
stuff to pass the lab and this is really really fact.


If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start  
forgetting the starting labs.


What i understand is we really need a practise practise /  
understanding to clearing the lab.


I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they  
would have not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me  
to even get so close to the lab.


I have done some mistake which has taken my lab

I was practising since last 1 year

I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs

I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.

Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the  
support from everyone, Now we will see on ver 3


I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone  
want it :)


Regards
Vishal

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Quick way to wipe voicemail from ALL mailboxes.

[Scott ODonnell]

I started looking at that also.But it seems you can only target voicemail
that is at least one day old.


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Jonathan Charles  wrote:

> MSM lets you annihilate everything.
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Scott ODonnell
> wrote:
> > Does anyone know of a way to wipe all voicemails from a single or ALL
> > mailboxes quickly.
> > After messing around with various configs, I end up with a lot of
> messages
> > to delete.
> > Is there anything in Cisco unity tool depot?
> > - Scott
> >
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Connection Monitor Duration

[Daniel Tham]

 Hi,

  A question on Connection Monitor Duration. What happened when we set it to
zero?  Does that mean that the phones register back to CM once it can reach
it?

Thanks!

Daniel

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

[wilfred d'souza]

Yes on second buttons on phones we will have 3005 along with 3101 and 3102. So 
when someone calls 3101 or 3102 the second buttons of the phones will ring. 
Would this make sense. Also for Envelope, 3005 is the primary line and not 
secondary line. If there is any requirement of label on the second line then 
that can be configured on 3005 as the required label. Is there a requirement 
that the envelope needs to be on 3101 and 3102 when a VM is left on them 
directly?

Thanks,
Wilfred

--- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu  wrote:

From: Cristi Radescu 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 5:36 PM






 

 







No. First thing with your config, on
second buttons on phones you will have number „3005”. 

Also envelope don’t work with secondary
numbers. 

Try it. You will see. 

   









From:
wilfred d'souza [mailto:wilfred_the...@yahoo.co.in] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009
9:57 AM

To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ;
Cristi Radescu

Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 



   


 
  
  Guys,

  

  How about this... 
  Phone
  1 
  Line1
  : 3001 
  Line2
  : 3101 
    
  Phone
  2 
  Line1
  : 3002 
  Line2
  : 3102 
    
  If
  GDM extn is 3005, then  
    
  ephone-dn 3

  number 3005 secondary 3101

  

  ephone-dn 4

  number 3005 secondary 3102

  

  ephone 1

  button 1:1 2m3

  

  ephone 2 

  button 1:2 2m4

  

  I guess this would work correct?

  

  Thanks,

  Wilfred

  

  

  

  --- On Wed, 10/6/09, wilfred d'souza 
  wrote: 
  

  From: wilfred d'souza 

  Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on
  2phones

  To: " ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com "
  < ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >,
  "Cristi Radescu" 

  Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 2:45 PM 
  
  
   

ooh yes... my bad... 







--- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu 
wrote: 


From: Cristi Radescu 

Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on
2phones

To: "wilfred d'souza" , "
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com " <
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >

Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 2:25 PM 


Wilfred, you can not configure 2 extensions
after „m”. 
You can monitor only one extension. 
  




From:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of wilfred d'souza

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009
6:43 AM

To: Michael Ciarfello;
 Cliff McGlamry ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
; Cristi Radescu

Subject: Re: [OSL |
CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 

  

 
  
  Guys,

  

  How about monitor? For example  
  Phone 1 
  Line1 : 3001 
  Line2 : 3101 
    
  Phone 2 
  Line1 : 3002 
  Line2 : 3102 
    
  If GDM extn is 3005, then  
    
  ephone 1 
  button 1:1 2m5,3 
    
  ephone 2 
  button 1:2  2m5,4 
    
  Lemme know if this works... I dont have it setup right
  now else would have tested it but if i remember it I think I had
  accomplished this 
    
  Thanks, 
  Wilfred 
  

  

  --- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu 
  wrote: 
  

  From: Cristi Radescu 

  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on
  2phones

  To: "Michael Ciarfello" , "
 Cliff McGlamry "
  , " ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
  " < ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
  >

  Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 11:05 AM 
  
  
  I will say „NO” too. 
  I tested many scenarios that came in my
  mind without a positive result. 
  If you cofigure overlay as Cliff suggested,
  you must put it as first extension after „o” in order for envelope to
  show on both phones. But if you will do this, you will modify the look of
  the phone(second line will show this extension). 
    
  
  
  
  
  From:
  Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com] 

  Sent: Wednesday, June 10,
  2009 5:45 AM

  To: Cliff
   McGlamry ; Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

  Subject: RE: [OSL |
  CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 
  
    
  
  Did this ever get solved?  Am I
  correct in saying the answer so far is NO? 
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  From:
  ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
  [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
 Cliff McGlamry [cl...@mcglamry.net]

  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009
  3:47 PM

  To: Cristi Radescu;
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

  Subject: Re: [OSL |
  CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 
  
  
  

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario

[Larry Hadrava]

Aamir:
I'm taking a closer look. Also please make sure that you have downloaded the
latest Voice workbook versions as the new V3 blueprint workbook has been
getting some updates as issues are reported.

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com 


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Aamir Panjwani <
aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote:

>  Hi ipexpert,
>
>
>
> We haven’t had any feedback regarding this issue. Can someone please look
> into it for us?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> *From:* Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 27 May 2009 10:07 AM
> *To:* Otto Sanchez; Mark Snow; Vik Malhi
> *Cc:* Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario
>
>
>
> Otto:
>
> Very interesting. Your debugs confirmed my suspicion about the signaling
> not being carried properly.
>
>
>
> I've copied Mark and Vik on this so you can the the scoop from the true
> authorities:-)
>
>
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com 
>
>  On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Otto Sanchez 
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm running into the exact same issue as Aamir does. If you make a debug
> ccsip messages of such a call, you don't see any sip response back to the
> cme sip phone when the call is answered at hq...,
>
> I changed the signalling from h323 to sip and everything works just fine,
>
> I was wondering if the reason why this call is failing is by the following
> statement:
>
> "SIP endpoints are not supported on H.323 trunks. SIP endpoints are
> supported on SIP trunks only. "
> source:cme config guide
>
> http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guide/cmebasic.html
>
> Any advice appreciated,
>
> Otto
>
>
>
>
> Mensaje original-
> De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com en nombre de Aamir Panjwani
> Enviado el: mar 26/05/2009 18:39
> Para: Larry Hadrava
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Asunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario
>
>
>
> Thanks for your response Larry. When I call from CME SIP to any phone in
> HQ via gatekeeper it rings on HQ phone but when I lift the handset or
> press answer soft key it stops ringing on HQ phone (but "answer" key is
> still displayed on the HQ phone) and at the same time it is ringing on
> calling phone (CME SIP) with "ring out" on the display for 3 rings and
> then it eventually disconnects.  There is no VM setup involve and it
> works fine without gatekeeper.
>
>
>
> I have testing above in my own lab, however, I ran into exactly same
> problem when I had a proctor lab session last Saturday. So calling from
> CME SIP (XLite) to HQ SIP (CIPC) same problem. What is even more
> interesting is when I loaded final config of lab 4A in which everything
> meant to be working I still had a same problem! and yes I did "revert
> entire pod" before loading final lab 4A
>
>
>
> Many Thanks
>
>
>
> From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com ]
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 8:47 AM
> To: Aamir Panjwani
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario
>
>
>
> Aamir:
>
> So, from the description, when calling from the SIP phone, the call goes
> through and you answer the call but the SIP device does not show as
> connected? Does it keep ringing of does it eventually go to VM?
>
> I'm just wondering where the problem is - on the calling or called end.
> Sounds like that some supervisory signaling is not being passed
> properly.
>
>
>
> Are you doing this lab on a Proctor labs rack? Does this setup work
> without the gatekeeper?
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com 
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Aamir Panjwani
>  wrote:
>
> Guys any idea regarding below issue please?
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
> On Behalf Of Aamir
> Panjwani
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 May 2009 6:23 PM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> As per lab 4A  I have setup a GK trunk between CUCM and CME and I got
> following problem. When I call from CME SIP phone (7961) to SCCP or SIP
> phone (7961)  at HQ it rings on HQ phone but when I answer the call it
> is still ringing out on calling party (CME SIP). Other way around is
> just fine. Also, calling from CME SCCP to HQ SIP or SCCP is fine too.
>
>
>
> My config is similar to proctor guide solution.  Has anyone else ran
> into this problem before?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Aamir
>
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

[Cristi Radescu]

No. First thing with your config, on second buttons on phones you will have 
number "3005".
Also envelope don't work with secondary numbers.
Try it. You will see.


From: wilfred d'souza [mailto:wilfred_the...@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:57 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Cristi Radescu
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

Guys,

How about this...
Phone 1
Line1 : 3001
Line2 : 3101

Phone 2
Line1 : 3002
Line2 : 3102

If GDM extn is 3005, then

ephone-dn 3
number 3005 secondary 3101

ephone-dn 4
number 3005 secondary 3102

ephone 1
button 1:1 2m3

ephone 2
button 1:2 2m4

I guess this would work correct?

Thanks,
Wilfred



--- On Wed, 10/6/09, wilfred d'souza  wrote:

From: wilfred d'souza 
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" , "Cristi 
Radescu" 
Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 2:45 PM
ooh yes... my bad...



--- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu  wrote:

From: Cristi Radescu 
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
To: "wilfred d'souza" , 
"ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 2:25 PM
Wilfred, you can not configure 2 extensions after "m".
You can monitor only one extension.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of wilfred d'souza
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:43 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello; Cliff McGlamry ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ; Cristi 
Radescu
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

Guys,

How about monitor? For example
Phone 1
Line1 : 3001
Line2 : 3101

Phone 2
Line1 : 3002
Line2 : 3102

If GDM extn is 3005, then

ephone 1
button 1:1 2m5,3

ephone 2
button 1:2  2m5,4

Lemme know if this works... I dont have it setup right now else would have 
tested it but if i remember it I think I had accomplished this

Thanks,
Wilfred


--- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu  wrote:

From: Cristi Radescu 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
To: "Michael Ciarfello" , " Cliff McGlamry " 
, " ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com " < 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >
Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 11:05 AM
I will say "NO" too.
I tested many scenarios that came in my mind without a positive result.
If you cofigure overlay as Cliff suggested, you must put it as first extension 
after "o" in order for envelope to show on both phones. But if you will do 
this, you will modify the look of the phone(second line will show this 
extension).


From: Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 5:45 AM
To: Cliff McGlamry ; Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

Did this ever get solved?  Am I correct in saying the answer so far is NO?


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry 
[cl...@mcglamry.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:47 PM
To: Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
Actually, you might be able to do it if it is on CME.

Assign button 2 as an overlay, and put the mailbox number DN on the overlay 
ephone-dn.  It should be hard forwarded so it will never ring, but I bet that 
would make the envelope appear the way being discussed.

From: Cristi Radescu
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:22 AM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones


I think this is not possible. With "secondary number" or "overlay" it will not 
work.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David Corbeil
Sent: 27 May, 2009 8:42 PM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2 phones

Hi,

I want to know if it's possible to have the voicemail letter on the second line 
of 2 phones without changing the phone facing.

Example:

Phone 1
Line1 : 3001
Line2 : 3101

Phone 2
Line1 : 3002
Line2 : 3102

Each line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when a message is left on GDM I 
need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone.
Can't have line 3
Can't modify the look of the phone

It's possible? If yes, how ?

Thanks

David Corbeil
Consultant en technologie | Technology Consultant
Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333
Membre de l'équipe TELUS




New Email names for you! 

Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @roc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario

[Aamir Panjwani]

Hi ipexpert,

 

We haven't had any feedback regarding this issue. Can someone please
look into it for us?

 

Thanks

 

From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 10:07 AM
To: Otto Sanchez; Mark Snow; Vik Malhi
Cc: Aamir Panjwani; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario

 

Otto:

Very interesting. Your debugs confirmed my suspicion about the signaling
not being carried properly. 

 

I've copied Mark and Vik on this so you can the the scoop from the true
authorities:-)


Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com



On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Otto Sanchez
 wrote:

Hello,

I'm running into the exact same issue as Aamir does. If you make a debug
ccsip messages of such a call, you don't see any sip response back to
the cme sip phone when the call is answered at hq...,

I changed the signalling from h323 to sip and everything works just
fine,

I was wondering if the reason why this call is failing is by the
following statement:

"SIP endpoints are not supported on H.323 trunks. SIP endpoints are
supported on SIP trunks only. "
source:cme config guide
http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guid
e/cmebasic.html

Any advice appreciated,

Otto




Mensaje original-
De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com en nombre de Aamir Panjwani
Enviado el: mar 26/05/2009 18:39
Para: Larry Hadrava
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Asunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario 



Thanks for your response Larry. When I call from CME SIP to any phone in
HQ via gatekeeper it rings on HQ phone but when I lift the handset or
press answer soft key it stops ringing on HQ phone (but "answer" key is
still displayed on the HQ phone) and at the same time it is ringing on
calling phone (CME SIP) with "ring out" on the display for 3 rings and
then it eventually disconnects.  There is no VM setup involve and it
works fine without gatekeeper.



I have testing above in my own lab, however, I ran into exactly same
problem when I had a proctor lab session last Saturday. So calling from
CME SIP (XLite) to HQ SIP (CIPC) same problem. What is even more
interesting is when I loaded final config of lab 4A in which everything
meant to be working I still had a same problem! and yes I did "revert
entire pod" before loading final lab 4A



Many Thanks



From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:lar...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 8:47 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario



Aamir:

So, from the description, when calling from the SIP phone, the call goes
through and you answer the call but the SIP device does not show as
connected? Does it keep ringing of does it eventually go to VM?

I'm just wondering where the problem is - on the calling or called end.
Sounds like that some supervisory signaling is not being passed
properly.



Are you doing this lab on a Proctor labs rack? Does this setup work
without the gatekeeper?



Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com  



On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Aamir Panjwani
 wrote:

Guys any idea regarding below issue please?



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir
Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, 26 May 2009 6:23 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3: Lab4A Gatekeeper scenario



Hi All,



As per lab 4A  I have setup a GK trunk between CUCM and CME and I got
following problem. When I call from CME SIP phone (7961) to SCCP or SIP
phone (7961)  at HQ it rings on HQ phone but when I answer the call it
is still ringing out on calling party (CME SIP). Other way around is
just fine. Also, calling from CME SCCP to HQ SIP or SCCP is fine too.



My config is similar to proctor guide solution.  Has anyone else ran
into this problem before?





Thanks



Aamir


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__



___

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 - DHCP on CUCM 7

[ctpresident]

Hi,

Sorry, I think I posted my reply only to Mark.

The solution he gave worked like a charm! So this mystery has been solved.

Thanks!

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Jonathan Charles  wrote:

> Do you have DHCP snooping enabled on your switch?
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:58 AM, ctpresident
> ctpresident wrote:
> > Hi team,
> >
> > This is going to sound bizzarre! And maybe, a little amateurish. But for
> > some reason, I cannot get dhcp on cucm 7 to dish out IP's! If I enable it
> on
> > a router or switch, no problem. I know this is the most basic of
> functions,
> > but it's bugging me insanely.
> >
> > At the moment (to get going with labs) I'm running dhcp off my router.
> The
> > dhcp monitor service is started, and I've restarted cucm service. I've
> got
> > the dhcp helper-address on the correct vlan, and have even tried on a
> > completely flat network. No go.
> >
> > Like I said, if I put any other dhcp server on the same subnet, all is
> good.
> >
> > BTW, I'm running it off the pub, haven't tested on the sub, but doubt
> that
> > will make a change. Server is added as dhcp server, and approriate scopes
> > created. Is there some "hidden" service that I need to activate?
> >
> > Urgh! Any advise will help.
> >
> > Thanks! Great forum by the way!!!
> >
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Its bad luck, but i was very very close to the lab

[vishal batra]

Hi,

It was a really amazing experience of CCIE we have to leave our family,
friends and every our loved one.

It would be really really very difficult if we do not have the real stuff to
pass the lab and this is really really fact.

If there are 10 labs when we reach practising 10th lab we start forgetting
the starting labs.

What i understand is we really need a practise practise / understanding
to clearing the lab.

I have completed my lab in 4:30 just due to ccievoicelabs if they would have
not released those 2 new labs it would realy difficuly me to even get so
close to the lab.

I have done some mistake which has taken my lab

I was practising since last 1 year

I have practise ipexpert labs, NLI labs , cciecert , ccievoicelabs

I have got the mgcp lab & my friend got H323 lab in sydney.

Best of luck to who all are attempting the and thanks for the support from
everyone, Now we will see on ver 3

I have all the updated labs with all the updates PM me if anyone want it :)

Regards
Vishal