[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Shared lines in CME SRST

[Matthew Hall]

Problem I'm having is as follows:

CME SRST
Two phones have a shared line 2010
I have srst dn mode set to octo, when registering, one or both of the phones 
always come up as remote in use and stay that way, no matter how many times I 
get them to unregister and reregister.  Anyone else seen this before?

Thanks

Matt
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1> 4.2 4.3

[Daniel Berlinski]

Hi Matthew

I'm using my own setup.

On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Matthew Berry wrote:

>  Are you using Proctor or your own lab setup?
>
>   *Matthew Berry*
>
> *A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written*
>
>
>
> *Vitals:*
>
> *GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044
>
> *Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
>
> *Skype*: ciscovoiceguru
>
> *Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru
>
>
>
> *Cert Stats:*
>
> Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009
>
> 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010
>
> On 6/5/2010 6:37 PM, Daniel Zeiger Berlinski wrote:
>
> Hello there
>
> I have completed the gatekeeper routing section of this lab and while
> testing I noticed that everytime I ring any BR2 phones from either HQ or BR1
> using g711ulaw from CUBE to CME the call drops after 1 minute apprx.
> Looking further I noticed that all WAN bandwidth I have, is taken to the
> point that OSPF adjacency is lost. (in the case of my devices I have 128Kbps
> for these Frame tails because of hardware limitations of my lab)
>
> Well, show gatekeeper call displays exactly how the question mandates and
> supplementary services such as hold work as well but just for apprx 1 minute
> for the reasons I mentioned before.
>
> If I hop on my Frame switch I see the bandwidth consumption going higher
> and higher as time elapses.  I'm running this setup with 2801 routers and
> 12.4(20)T2 advanced enterprise code.
>
> In essence what I'm seeing here is g711/g729 calls are consuming bandwidth
> until no more WAN bandwidth is available.
>  I am starting to suspect of this being bug related?
>
> I'm not able to see the reason behind such behaviour and would be greatful
> if someone could help.
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME 7.0 Presence caller-list is not working ...

[Shadow of Voice]

Hi Guys

Yes now it's working I just reload the router and re create CNF file it's
working now

thx
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Pavan K  wrote:

> As others have pointed out it works fine on 7.0.
> Just do a create cnf-files and reset if your SK phones dont show presence
> in call-list.
>
> -Pavan
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> Sometimes you have to reload the gw to make presence works
>>
>> hth
>>
>> --
>> Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:18:43 +0200
>> From: findko...@gmail.com
>> To: salman.shaik...@gmail.com
>> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME 7.0 Presence caller-list is not
>> working ...
>>
>>
>> and maybe
>>
>> sip-ua
>>presence enable
>>
>> will help?
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:16 PM, kobel  wrote:
>>
>> try "create cnf-files" & restart the phones.
>>
>>
>>   On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Shadow of Voice <
>> salman.shaik...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>   Hi Guys
>>
>> I have issue when configure presence in CME I allow subscribe and allow
>> watch globally still can't see caller list on missed call does any one know
>> where i am wrong and why my CME presence caller-list is not working
>>  !
>> presence
>>  presence call-list
>>  allow subscribe
>> !
>> ephone-dn  2  octo-line
>>  number 4002 no-reg primary
>>  description +6524044002
>>  name SiteC-Ph2
>>  allow watch
>>  call-forward busy 4220
>>  call-forward noan 4220 timeout 20
>> !
>> !
>> ephone  1
>>  device-security-mode none
>>  mac-address 001A.A1C8.0H8F
>>  ephone-template 1
>>  blf-speed-dial 1 4002 label "SiteC-Ph2"
>>  type 7961
>>  button  1:1 3:3 4:5
>> !
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it 
>> now.
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> - Pavan
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 1: gatekeeper and H.323 GW on the same router

[Matthew Berry]

A good rule of thumb is this:

Only use the "bind srcaddr" when configuring an H.323 gateway to 
"register" with CUCM.  If you are standing up a CME gateway, you enter 
the "h323-gateway voip interface" instead.


*Matthew Berry*

/A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/

*_Vitals:_*

*GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044

*Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com

*Skype*: ciscovoiceguru

*Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru

*_Cert Stats:_*

Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009

1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010


On 6/4/2010 7:53 PM, Daniel Zeiger Berlinski wrote:

Hello Kobel

I'm doing a few tests here and it seems that the difference between 
those 2 commands relates to which interface you are sourcing your RAS 
and H225 packets.  For instance if you remove h323-gateway voip bind 
srcaddr from the interface which contains the IP address of the CUCM 
configured H323 gateway I believe you are going to break your incoming 
HQ local PSTN calls.

Let me know if you found any different result.

Thanks

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:37 AM, kobel > wrote:


bingo! indeed, this solved the issue.

This command obviously binds all H.323 signaling to specific
interface (loopback in my case). So this explains why the incoming
calls were associated with the GK-controlled trunk (GK configured
on loopback). After removing this command, the source address is
bound with voice interface IP address, which is ok.

Another lesson learned - for calls routed via GK, the SETUP which
CUCM receives contains the source signaling IP address of the GK
(despite the fact it's sent directly by the remote GW). This is
why CUCM needs to sent ARQ to GK. Only ACF contains the signaling
IP address of the remote GW. Now it makes perfect sense, but I've
never though about it.

But still, one thing is not clear for me. What's the difference
between:
 * h323-gateway voip interface
 * h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.225.100.254
The command reference is not very clear on this.

Thanks for your input!


On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Pavan mailto:pav.c...@gmail.com>> wrote:


in your existing config, remove the h323gw bind source
interface command



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com 



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com
   
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1> 4.2 4.3

[Matthew Berry]

Are you using Proctor or your own lab setup?

*Matthew Berry*

/A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/

*_Vitals:_*

*GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044

*Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com

*Skype*: ciscovoiceguru

*Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru

*_Cert Stats:_*

Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009

1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010


On 6/5/2010 6:37 PM, Daniel Zeiger Berlinski wrote:

Hello there

I have completed the gatekeeper routing section of this lab and while 
testing I noticed that everytime I ring any BR2 phones from either HQ 
or BR1 using g711ulaw from CUBE to CME the call drops after 1 minute 
apprx.  Looking further I noticed that all WAN bandwidth I have, is 
taken to the point that OSPF adjacency is lost. (in the case of my 
devices I have 128Kbps for these Frame tails because of hardware 
limitations of my lab)


Well, show gatekeeper call displays exactly how the question mandates 
and supplementary services such as hold work as well but just for 
apprx 1 minute for the reasons I mentioned before.


If I hop on my Frame switch I see the bandwidth consumption going 
higher and higher as time elapses.  I'm running this setup with 2801 
routers and 12.4(20)T2 advanced enterprise code.


In essence what I'm seeing here is g711/g729 calls are consuming 
bandwidth until no more WAN bandwidth is available.

 I am starting to suspect of this being bug related?

I'm not able to see the reason behind such behaviour and would be 
greatful if someone could help.



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com
   
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1> 4.2 4.3

[Daniel Zeiger Berlinski]

Hello there

I have completed the gatekeeper routing section of this lab and while
testing I noticed that everytime I ring any BR2 phones from either HQ or BR1
using g711ulaw from CUBE to CME the call drops after 1 minute apprx.
Looking further I noticed that all WAN bandwidth I have, is taken to the
point that OSPF adjacency is lost. (in the case of my devices I have 128Kbps
for these Frame tails because of hardware limitations of my lab)

Well, show gatekeeper call displays exactly how the question mandates and
supplementary services such as hold work as well but just for apprx 1 minute
for the reasons I mentioned before.

If I hop on my Frame switch I see the bandwidth consumption going higher and
higher as time elapses.  I'm running this setup with 2801 routers and
12.4(20)T2 advanced enterprise code.

In essence what I'm seeing here is g711/g729 calls are consuming bandwidth
until no more WAN bandwidth is available.
 I am starting to suspect of this being bug related?

I'm not able to see the reason behind such behaviour and would be greatful
if someone could help.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME 7.0 Presence caller-list is not working ...

[Pavan K]

As others have pointed out it works fine on 7.0.
Just do a create cnf-files and reset if your SK phones dont show presence in
call-list.

-Pavan


On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Angel Perez  wrote:

>  Hi:
>
> Sometimes you have to reload the gw to make presence works
>
> hth
>
> --
> Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:18:43 +0200
> From: findko...@gmail.com
> To: salman.shaik...@gmail.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME 7.0 Presence caller-list is not working
> ...
>
>
> and maybe
>
> sip-ua
>presence enable
>
> will help?
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:16 PM, kobel  wrote:
>
> try "create cnf-files" & restart the phones.
>
>
>   On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Shadow of Voice <
> salman.shaik...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   Hi Guys
>
> I have issue when configure presence in CME I allow subscribe and allow
> watch globally still can't see caller list on missed call does any one know
> where i am wrong and why my CME presence caller-list is not working
> !
> presence
>  presence call-list
>  allow subscribe
> !
> ephone-dn  2  octo-line
>  number 4002 no-reg primary
>  description +6524044002
>  name SiteC-Ph2
>  allow watch
>  call-forward busy 4220
>  call-forward noan 4220 timeout 20
> !
> !
> ephone  1
>  device-security-mode none
>  mac-address 001A.A1C8.0H8F
>  ephone-template 1
>  blf-speed-dial 1 4002 label "SiteC-Ph2"
>  type 7961
>  button  1:1 3:3 4:5
> !
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it 
> now.
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
- Pavan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )

[Wael Agina]

Congratulations and wish you the best :)

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Steve Sarrick  wrote:

>  Congrats!!
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Moataz Mamdouh
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 05, 2010 11:03 AM
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )
>
>
>
> ALL
>
> I passed the exam from the first attempt , thank you all for you help ,
> really i learned a lot from
> you.
>
> Regards
> Moataz Mamdouh Tolba
> SEEGYPT
> Website:www.seegypt.com
> Technical Support Engineer
> CCIE # 26129
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 

Thanks and Best Regards,
Wael Agina
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )

[Steve Sarrick]

Congrats!!

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Moataz
Mamdouh
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 11:03 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )

 

ALL
I passed the exam from the first attempt , thank you all for you help ,
really i learned a lot from 
you.

Regards
Moataz Mamdouh Tolba 
SEEGYPT 
Website:www.seegypt.com
Technical Support Engineer
CCIE # 26129


 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP debug messages

[Ashar Siddiqui]

debug mgcp packet

it will show you everything..not sure why it's not showing it to you.. 

Jun  1 20:58:05.055: MGCP Packet received from 10.10.210.11:2427--->
200 521011088
<---

R1#
Jun  1 20:58:20.055: MGCP Packet sent to 10.10.210.11:2427--->
NTFY 521011089 *...@r1.ccievoice.com MGCP 0.1
X: 0
O:
<---

Jun  1 20:58:20.055: MGCP Packet received from
10.10.210.11:2427--->
200 521011089
<---

(Sub went down)

Jun  1 21:36:12.548: MGCP Packet sent to 10.10.210.10:2427--->
200 28
I:
X: 0
L: p:10-20, a:PCMU;PCMA;G.nX64, b:64, e:on, es-cci, gc:1, s:on, t:10,
r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:T;G;D;L;H;R;ATM;SST;FXR;PRE
L: p:10-220, a:G.729;G.729a;G.729b, b:8, e:on, es-cci, gc:1, s:on,
t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:T;G;D;L;H;R;ATM;SST;FXR;PRE
L: p:10-110, a:G.726-16;G.728, b:16, e:on, es-cci, gc:1, s:on, t:10,
r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:T;G;D;L;H;R;ATM;SST;FXR;PRE
L: p:10-70, a:G.726-24, b:24, e:on, es-cci, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g,
nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:T;G;D;L;H;R;ATM;SST;FXR;PRE
L: p:10-50, a:G.726-32, b:32, e:on, es-cci, gc:1, s:on, t:10, r:g,
nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:T;G;D;L;H;R;ATM;SST;FXR;PRE
L: p:30-270, a:G.723.1-H;G.723;G.723.1a-H, b:6, e:on, es-cci, gc:1,
s:on, t:10, r:g
R1#, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:T;G;D;L;H;R;ATM;SST;FXR;PRE
L: p:30-330, a:G.723.1-L;G.723.1a-L, b:5, e:on, es-cci, gc:1, s:on,
t:10, r:g, nt:IN;ATM;LOCAL, v:T;G;D;L;H;R;ATM;SST;FXR;PRE
M: sendonly, recvonly, sendrecv, inactive, loopback, conttest, data,
netwloop, netwtest
<---

Jun  1 21:36:12.548: MGCP Packet received from 10.10.210.10:2427--->
AUEP 29
S0/SU0/DS1-0/4...@r1.ccievoice.com MGCP 0.1
F: X, A, I
<---

Jun  1 21:36:12.548: MGCP Packet sent to 10.10.210.10:2427--->
500 29 Endpt Unknown
<---

(output omitted)

Ash>

kobel wrote:
I think you can't see this kind of information (i.e.
connection status) on the gateway itself.
The calls are managed by the call agent, and it's there where the full
GW state is kept. 
  
  On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 2:55 PM, jammer jones
  
wrote:
  


What debugs in the router can i use to see the following
information
 
 
communication between a mgcp gateway and mgcp call
agent(subscriber) that shows the status of a connected call.  And then
when the primary call-agent(subscriber) fails and the mgcp gateway
switches to the redundant mgcp call agent(publisher) i want to see the
same communications between the mgcp gateway and the new mgcp agent(the
publisher)
 
I have tried the following command and none of them give me
this information.
 
debug ccm-manager backhaul
debug ccm-manager events
debug mgcp packets
debug mgcp events
debug mgcp - crashes the routers?\
 
I have used CUCM traces with RTMT and I think i am seeing this
information, but not 100% sure
 
 



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com

  
  
  
  

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
  




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )

[Marko Milivojevic]

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 15:02, Moataz Mamdouh  wrote:
>
> ALL
> I passed the exam from the first attempt , thank you all for you help , 
> really i learned a lot from
> you.


Well done!

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
time with our Blended Learning Solution!

Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )

[bkvalent...@gmail.com]

Congrats!

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

- Reply message -
From: "wolfsrudel" 
Date: Sat, Jun 5, 2010 11:32 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )
To: "Moataz Mamdouh" 
Cc: 


congratulations moataz!!!
time to relax now ;-)

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Moataz Mamdouh wrote:

> ALL
> I passed the exam from the first attempt , thank you all for you help ,
> really i learned a lot from
> you.
>
> Regards
> Moataz Mamdouh Tolba
> SEEGYPT
> Website:www.seegypt.com
> Technical Support Engineer
> CCIE # 26129
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )

[wolfsrudel]

congratulations moataz!!!
time to relax now ;-)

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Moataz Mamdouh wrote:

> ALL
> I passed the exam from the first attempt , thank you all for you help ,
> really i learned a lot from
> you.
>
> Regards
> Moataz Mamdouh Tolba
> SEEGYPT
> Website:www.seegypt.com
> Technical Support Engineer
> CCIE # 26129
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )

[Moataz Mamdouh]

ALL
I passed the exam from the first attempt , thank you all for you help , really 
i learned a lot from 
you.

Regards
Moataz Mamdouh Tolba 
SEEGYPT 
Website:www.seegypt.com
Technical Support Engineer
CCIE # 26129


 



  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [SUSPECTED SPAM] RE: Lab and Language settings

[wolfsrudel]

there's likely enough fundamentalism on the matter to adding other
item on the list.
let's be less radical and simply ignore such questions and/or comments.
for sure, it would best not to forbid than to live and let live.

On 6/5/10, Angel Perez  wrote:
>
> Your are right, NDA affects those candidates who have attempted the lab,
> anyway, please for these people under NDA don't answer any question
> regarding the "lab"
>
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/downloads/guest/learning/c644/ccmigration_09186a00803641d2.pdf
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/exam/violation_rules.html
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM] RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings
> From: r.ochi...@mfient.com
> To: gorr...@hotmail.com; jon1...@hotmail.com
> CC: siddas...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 22:33:43 +0300
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It isn’t true that I cannot use the word lab….i can ask what the temperature
> is like in the lab, is the proctor in the lab, what is the lab topology like
> without necessarily breaking the NDA. You can ask anything, It’s upon me the
> person restricted by NDA to tell you that I cannot answer that as I’ll be
> breaking NDA
> I think NDA would apply to those who’ve attempted or passed the lab. Others
> have not agreed to any NDA
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Angel Perez
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 9:37 PM
> To: jon1...@hotmail.com; siddas...@gmail.com; osl osl
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings
>
> Don't worry,  just think that if you include the word "lab" in you question
> you would be breaking NDA :(
>
>
>
>
> From: jon1...@hotmail.com
> To: gorr...@hotmail.com; siddas...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings
> Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 03:19:11 +0900
>
> Thanks, and sorry didn’t really mean to ask contents, more of a rough info.
> question as in blueprints don’t say it, so was pretty much curious.
>
>
>
> Thanks for the heads up
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Angel Perez
>
> Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 2:25 AM
>
> To: siddas...@gmail.com ; jon1...@hotmail.com ; osl osl
>
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings
>
>
> Hi Jon, you can't ask anything about exam contents, sorry
>
>
>
>
> From: siddas...@gmail.com
> To: jon1...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:39:27 +0100
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings
>
> No, I don’t think so..
> As a rule of thumb just select US (English) where ever needed.
>
> Ash>
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jon1992
> Sent: 04 June 2010 15:36
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> Was just curious, does the lab get involved at all with locale settings or
> how to upload files for the languages to be available?
>
>
>
> I didn’t see much mention of it in the blueprint, so was curious for those
> who have attempted, any mention of it?
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Jon
>
>
>
>
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
>
>
>
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.
> 
>
> _
> Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper proxy

[jammer jones]

is it possible to set up a router as a gatekeepr and then use a different
interface on the router as a gatekeeper proxy.  Also is their a certain
version of code or feature set that supports the proxy h323 command.  I do
not seem to see this command as an option on any of my routers


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Proxy-Assisted Call Setup

[jammer jones]

is it possible to set up a router as a gatekeepr and then use a different
interface on the router as a gatekeeper proxy.  Also is their a certain
version of code or feature set that supports the proxy h323 command.  I do
not seem to see this command as an option on any of my routers

https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/vvf_c/cisco_ios_h323_configuration_guide/old_archives_h323/5gkconf.html#wpmkr1235747
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP debug messages

[kobel]

I think you can't see this kind of information (i.e. connection status) on
the gateway itself.
The calls are managed by the call agent, and it's there where the full GW
state is kept.

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 2:55 PM, jammer jones wrote:

> What debugs in the router can i use to see the following information
>
>
> communication between a mgcp gateway and mgcp call agent(subscriber) that
> shows the status of a connected call.  And then when the primary
> call-agent(subscriber) fails and the mgcp gateway switches to the redundant
> mgcp call agent(publisher) i want to see the same communications between the
> mgcp gateway and the new mgcp agent(the publisher)
>
> I have tried the following command and none of them give me this
> information.
>
> debug ccm-manager backhaul
> debug ccm-manager events
> debug mgcp packets
> debug mgcp events
> debug mgcp - crashes the routers?\
>
> I have used CUCM traces with RTMT and I think i am seeing this information,
> but not 100% sure
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP debug messages

[Dani Bug]

call 911 and once call connected then shutdown your subscriber and enable
these debug command you should see AUCX , RQNT etc something like that ...

debug mgcp packets
debug mgcp events
debug mgcp

Dani

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:54 AM, jammer jones wrote:

> What debugs in the router can i use to see the following information
>
>
> communication between a mgcp gateway and mgcp call agent(subscriber) that
> shows the status of a connected call.  And then when the primary
> call-agent(subscriber) fails and the mgcp gateway switches to the redundant
> mgcp call agent(publisher) i want to see the same communications between the
> mgcp gateway and the new mgcp agent(the publisher)
>
> I have tried the following command and none of them give me this
> information.
>
> debug ccm-manager backhaul
> debug ccm-manager events
> debug mgcp packets
> debug mgcp events
> debug mgcp - crashes the routers?\
>
> I have used CUCM traces with RTMT and I think i am seeing this information,
> but not 100% sure
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP debug messages

[jammer jones]

What debugs in the router can i use to see the following information


communication between a mgcp gateway and mgcp call agent(subscriber) that
shows the status of a connected call.  And then when the primary
call-agent(subscriber) fails and the mgcp gateway switches to the redundant
mgcp call agent(publisher) i want to see the same communications between the
mgcp gateway and the new mgcp agent(the publisher)

I have tried the following command and none of them give me this
information.

debug ccm-manager backhaul
debug ccm-manager events
debug mgcp packets
debug mgcp events
debug mgcp - crashes the routers?\

I have used CUCM traces with RTMT and I think i am seeing this information,
but not 100% sure
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP debug messages

[jammer jones]

What debugs in the router can i use to see the following information


communication between a mgcp gateway and mgcp call agent(subscriber) that
shows the status of a connected call.  And then when the primary
call-agent(subscriber) fails and the mgcp gateway switches to the redundant
mgcp call agent(publisher) i want to see the same communications between the
mgcp gateway and the new mgcp agent(the publisher)

I have tried the following command and none of them give me this
information.

debug ccm-manager backhaul
debug ccm-manager events
debug mgcp packets
debug mgcp events
debug mgcp - crashes the routers?\

I have used CUCM traces with RTMT and I think i am seeing this information,
but not 100% sure
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME 7.0 Presence caller-list is not working ...

[Angel Perez]

Hi:

 

Sometimes you have to reload the gw to make presence works

 

hth

 


Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:18:43 +0200
From: findko...@gmail.com
To: salman.shaik...@gmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME 7.0 Presence caller-list is not working ...

and maybe 

sip-ua
   presence enable

will help?


On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:16 PM, kobel  wrote:

try "create cnf-files" & restart the phones.






On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Shadow of Voice  
wrote:





Hi Guys
 
I have issue when configure presence in CME I allow subscribe and allow watch 
globally still can't see caller list on missed call does any one know where i 
am wrong and why my CME presence caller-list is not working 

!
presence  
 presence call-list
 allow subscribe
!
ephone-dn  2  octo-line
 number 4002 no-reg primary
 description +6524044002
 name SiteC-Ph2
 allow watch
 call-forward busy 4220
 call-forward noan 4220 timeout 20
!
!
ephone  1
 device-security-mode none
 mac-address 001A.A1C8.0H8F
 ephone-template 1
 blf-speed-dial 1 4002 label "SiteC-Ph2"
 type 7961
 button  1:1 3:3 4:5
!
 
  
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 1: gatekeeper and H.323 GW on the same router

[kobel]

I consulted "Cisco IOS H.323 Configuration Guide".

h323-gateway voip interface:
To configure a Cisco device as an H.323 gateway in a service provider
environment, configure at least one of its interfaces as a gateway
interface. Use either an interface that is connected to the gatekeeper or
a loopback interface for the gateway interface.


h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr ip-addres:
H.323 support for virtual interfaces allows the IP address of the gateway to
be configured so that the IP address included in the H.323 packet is always
the source IP address of the gateway, regardless of the physical interface
and protocol used. This single-address feature allows firewall applications
to be easily configured to work with H.323 messages.

As I see it:
 * when interface is configured with the first command, it'll listen to
H.323 signaling on its address, but signaling messages sent from the GW will
use it's IP address of the interface facing the destination (might be
different)
* the second command makes the GW always use the configured scraddr as
signaling source IP address in H.323 messges.

So it means, that if I configure the H.323 GW on CUCM, I need to use the IP
address which is configured on GW's interface, which has "h323-gateway voip
interface" command.
But if I want the GW to register with GK with specific IP address, I need
the second command.

Anybody disagrees?


On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Daniel Zeiger Berlinski <
dberlin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Kobel
>
> I'm doing a few tests here and it seems that the difference between those 2
> commands relates to which interface you are sourcing your RAS and H225
> packets.  For instance if you remove h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr from the
> interface which contains the IP address of the CUCM configured H323 gateway
> I believe you are going to break your incoming HQ local PSTN calls.
> Let me know if you found any different result.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:37 AM, kobel  wrote:
>
>> bingo! indeed, this solved the issue.
>>
>> This command obviously binds all H.323 signaling to specific interface
>> (loopback in my case). So this explains why the incoming calls were
>> associated with the GK-controlled trunk (GK configured on loopback). After
>> removing this command, the source address is bound with voice interface IP
>> address, which is ok.
>>
>> Another lesson learned - for calls routed via GK, the SETUP which CUCM
>> receives contains the source signaling IP address of the GK (despite the
>> fact it's sent directly by the remote GW). This is why CUCM needs to sent
>> ARQ to GK. Only ACF contains the signaling IP address of the remote GW. Now
>> it makes perfect sense, but I've never though about it.
>>
>> But still, one thing is not clear for me. What's the difference between:
>>  * h323-gateway voip interface
>>  * h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.225.100.254
>> The command reference is not very clear on this.
>>
>> Thanks for your input!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Pavan  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> in your existing config, remove the h323gw bind source interface command
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME 7.0 Presence caller-list is not working ...

[kobel]

and maybe

sip-ua
   presence enable

will help?

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:16 PM, kobel  wrote:

> try "create cnf-files" & restart the phones.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Shadow of Voice  > wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys
>>
>> I have issue when configure presence in CME I allow subscribe and allow
>> watch globally still can't see caller list on missed call does any one know
>> where i am wrong and why my CME presence caller-list is not working
>>  !
>> presence
>>  presence call-list
>>  allow subscribe
>> !
>> ephone-dn  2  octo-line
>>  number 4002 no-reg primary
>>  description +6524044002
>>  name SiteC-Ph2
>>  allow watch
>>  call-forward busy 4220
>>  call-forward noan 4220 timeout 20
>> !
>> !
>> ephone  1
>>  device-security-mode none
>>  mac-address 001A.A1C8.0H8F
>>  ephone-template 1
>>  blf-speed-dial 1 4002 label "SiteC-Ph2"
>>  type 7961
>>  button  1:1 3:3 4:5
>> !
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME 7.0 Presence caller-list is not working ...

[kobel]

try "create cnf-files" & restart the phones.


On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Shadow of Voice
wrote:

> Hi Guys
>
> I have issue when configure presence in CME I allow subscribe and allow
> watch globally still can't see caller list on missed call does any one know
> where i am wrong and why my CME presence caller-list is not working
>  !
> presence
>  presence call-list
>  allow subscribe
> !
> ephone-dn  2  octo-line
>  number 4002 no-reg primary
>  description +6524044002
>  name SiteC-Ph2
>  allow watch
>  call-forward busy 4220
>  call-forward noan 4220 timeout 20
> !
> !
> ephone  1
>  device-security-mode none
>  mac-address 001A.A1C8.0H8F
>  ephone-template 1
>  blf-speed-dial 1 4002 label "SiteC-Ph2"
>  type 7961
>  button  1:1 3:3 4:5
> !
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [SUSPECTED SPAM] RE: Lab and Language settings

[Angel Perez]

Your are right, NDA affects those candidates who have attempted the lab, 
anyway, please for these people under NDA don't answer any question regarding 
the "lab"

 

http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/downloads/guest/learning/c644/ccmigration_09186a00803641d2.pdf


http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/exam/violation_rules.html

 

Thanks


Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM] RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings
From: r.ochi...@mfient.com
To: gorr...@hotmail.com; jon1...@hotmail.com
CC: siddas...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 22:33:43 +0300







It isn’t true that I cannot use the word lab….i can ask what the temperature is 
like in the lab, is the proctor in the lab, what is the lab topology like 
without necessarily breaking the NDA. You can ask anything, It’s upon me the 
person restricted by NDA to tell you that I cannot answer that as I’ll be 
breaking NDA
I think NDA would apply to those who’ve attempted or passed the lab. Others 
have not agreed to any NDA
 


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Angel Perez
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 9:37 PM
To: jon1...@hotmail.com; siddas...@gmail.com; osl osl
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings
 
Don't worry,  just think that if you include the word "lab" in you question you 
would be breaking NDA :(
 



From: jon1...@hotmail.com
To: gorr...@hotmail.com; siddas...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 03:19:11 +0900

Thanks, and sorry didn’t really mean to ask contents, more of a rough info. 
question as in blueprints don’t say it, so was pretty much curious.

 

Thanks for the heads up


 


From: Angel Perez 

Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 2:25 AM

To: siddas...@gmail.com ; jon1...@hotmail.com ; osl osl 

Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings

 
Hi Jon, you can't ask anything about exam contents, sorry
 



From: siddas...@gmail.com
To: jon1...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:39:27 +0100
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings

No, I don’t think so..
As a rule of thumb just select US (English) where ever needed.

Ash>
 


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jon1992
Sent: 04 June 2010 15:36
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab and Language settings
 

Hi

 

Was just curious, does the lab get involved at all with locale settings or how 
to upload files for the languages to be available?

 

I didn’t see much mention of it in the blueprint, so was curious for those who 
have attempted, any mention of it?

 

Thanks
Jon
 



Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. 



Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.  
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com