[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlab Voice Rack Vouchers

2010-08-13 Thread Kayode Salawu
Hi All,

I've got 49 Proctorlabs CCIE Voice vRack vouchers that I am not using at the 
moment.
I purchased them on 28/05/2010 for my Voice Lab studies and are still valid for 
about 9 months.

I have decided to go through the CCIE RS path first and leave Voice for now.

Anyone interested please contact me.

I apologize for spamming the study-list like this.


Regards,
Kayode Salawu___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUBE supplementally service problem lab 1 vol2

2010-08-13 Thread amr thabt
Hi all
I configure GK CBUE for lab1 vol 2 Q 4.2 and Iit works fine except one point
when I call fro hq phone2 to 3006 (sip phone int br2) I can answer the cal
but once I put the call in hold (in 3006) I can't resume

Every thing is working fine

Isthere any idea ?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper IPIPGW

2010-08-13 Thread Matthew Hall
outvia sends the call to the zone specified on the way to the destination zone 
(like a next hop statement in a policy routebut not really).  The 
gatekeeper then just looks for a cube registered in that outvia zone.  The cube 
has to have a matching inbound voip dialpeer AND a outgoing dialpeer with a 
destination pattern that matches the outbound digits and session target RAS.  
The CUBE uses that dial-peer to send the call back to the gatekeeper, the 
gatekeeper knows then to send the call on to the final zone without looping 
back to the CUBE.

Matt

On Aug 12, 2010, at 1:19 PM, CCIE Voice GMAIL wrote:

 Hi Matt,
 
 I wanted to see what the logic was behind the zone local statement.  Is it
 good practice to do it that way (invia and outvia) for Intra-zone GK
 routing?  From what I would understand, this is almost implied by just
 saying zone local GK 
 
 Can you share with me your reasoning for doing it this way?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccieid1ot
 Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:40 AM
 To: Matthew Berry
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper IPIPGW
 
 Use this on your local GK.
 
 gatekeeper
 zone local GK cisco.com x.x.x.x invia GK outvia GK enable-intrazone
 zone remote BBGK cisco.com x.x.x.x1719
 zone prefix BBGK 01132*
 zone prefix BBGK 01144*
 no shutdown
 
 
 On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Edwin -
 You need to add the outvia command to the end of your remote zone and
 specify the zone that has your IPIPGW.
 Thanks,
 
 Matthew Berry
 ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
 http://ciscovoiceguru.com
 On Aug 11, 2010, at 7:13 PM, Edwin Dotson wrote:
 
 Sorry for all the same topic.  I have successfully got my 2 gatekeepers
 talking and calls back and fourth. But now I can’t get calls to pass
 through
 the IPIPGW it sends the calls directly to the Remote Gatekeeper. To
 identify
 calls destined for the IPIPGW I have been using 3#.
 
 LOCAL GK/IPIPGW
 version 12.4
 service timestamps debug datetime msec
 service timestamps log datetime msec
 no service password-encryption
 !
 hostname LOCAL
 !
 boot-start-marker
 boot system flash flash:c3825-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-25c.bin
 boot-end-marker
 !
 enable password
 !
 no aaa new-model
 ip cef
 !
 !
 !
 !
 ip auth-proxy max-nodata-conns 3
 ip admission max-nodata-conns 3
 !
 voice-card 0
 no dspfarm
 !
 !
 !
 !
 voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 supplementary-service h450.12
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 voice translation-rule 1
 rule 1 /^3#/ //
 !
 !
 voice translation-profile strip3#
 translate called 1
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.201.3.30 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 media-type rj45
 !
 interface GigabitEthernet0/1
 ip address 172.24.200.5 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 media-type rj45
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id GK ipaddr 172.24.200.5 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id CUBE
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 3#
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.24.200.5
 !
 ip forward-protocol nd
 !
 !
 ip http server
 no ip http secure-server
 !
 !
 !
 !
 control-plane
 !
 !
 !
 dial-peer voice 12 voip
 description Incoming Dialplan
 translation-profile incoming strip3#
 session target ras
 incoming-called number .
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric!
 !
 !
 gateway
 timer receive-rtp 1200
 !
 !
 !
 !
 gatekeeper
 zone local GK 172.24.200.5
 zone remote REMOTEGK cisco.com 172.24.200.6 1719
 zone prefix GK 3*
 zone prefix REMOTEGK 5...
 zone prefix GK 6...
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 no shutdown
 !
 !
 line con 0
 line aux 0
 line vty 0 4
 password login
 !
 scheduler allocate 2 1000
 !
 end
 
 
 Remote Gatekeeper/CME
 version 12.4
 service timestamps debug datetime msec
 service timestamps log datetime msec
 no service password-encryption
 !
 hostname REMOTE
 !
 boot-start-marker
 boot system flash flash:c3845-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-25c.bin
 boot-end-marker
 !
 enable password
 !
 no aaa new-model
 voice-card 0
 no dspfarm
 !
 voice-card 1
 no dspfarm
 !
 ip cef
 !
 !
 !
 !
 ip auth-proxy max-nodata-conns 3
 ip admission max-nodata-conns 3
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 archive
 log config
   hidekeys
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip address 172.24.200.6 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 media-type rj45
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id REMOTEGK ipaddr 172.24.200.6 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id CME
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.24.200.6
 !
 interface GigabitEthernet0/1
 no ip address
 shutdown
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 media-type rj45
 !
 interface Service-Engine3/0
 no ip address
 shutdown
 !
 ip forward-protocol nd
 ip route 0.0.0.0 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper IPIPGW

2010-08-13 Thread Matthew Berry
Good description 
!


Matthew Berry

**Sent from my iPhone**
Skype/Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Google Voice: +1 612 424 5044

On Aug 13, 2010, at 16:30, Matthew Hall 1.matt.h...@gmail.com wrote:

 outvia sends the call to the zone specified on the way to the destination 
 zone (like a next hop statement in a policy routebut not really).  The 
 gatekeeper then just looks for a cube registered in that outvia zone.  The 
 cube has to have a matching inbound voip dialpeer AND a outgoing dialpeer 
 with a destination pattern that matches the outbound digits and session 
 target RAS.  The CUBE uses that dial-peer to send the call back to the 
 gatekeeper, the gatekeeper knows then to send the call on to the final zone 
 without looping back to the CUBE.
 
 Matt
 
 On Aug 12, 2010, at 1:19 PM, CCIE Voice GMAIL wrote:
 
 Hi Matt,
 
 I wanted to see what the logic was behind the zone local statement.  Is it
 good practice to do it that way (invia and outvia) for Intra-zone GK
 routing?  From what I would understand, this is almost implied by just
 saying zone local GK 
 
 Can you share with me your reasoning for doing it this way?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccieid1ot
 Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:40 AM
 To: Matthew Berry
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper IPIPGW
 
 Use this on your local GK.
 
 gatekeeper
 zone local GK cisco.com x.x.x.x invia GK outvia GK enable-intrazone
 zone remote BBGK cisco.com x.x.x.x1719
 zone prefix BBGK 01132*
 zone prefix BBGK 01144*
 no shutdown
 
 
 On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Edwin -
 You need to add the outvia command to the end of your remote zone and
 specify the zone that has your IPIPGW.
 Thanks,
 
 Matthew Berry
 ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
 http://ciscovoiceguru.com
 On Aug 11, 2010, at 7:13 PM, Edwin Dotson wrote:
 
 Sorry for all the same topic.  I have successfully got my 2 gatekeepers
 talking and calls back and fourth. But now I can’t get calls to pass
 through
 the IPIPGW it sends the calls directly to the Remote Gatekeeper. To
 identify
 calls destined for the IPIPGW I have been using 3#.
 
 LOCAL GK/IPIPGW
 version 12.4
 service timestamps debug datetime msec
 service timestamps log datetime msec
 no service password-encryption
 !
 hostname LOCAL
 !
 boot-start-marker
 boot system flash flash:c3825-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-25c.bin
 boot-end-marker
 !
 enable password
 !
 no aaa new-model
 ip cef
 !
 !
 !
 !
 ip auth-proxy max-nodata-conns 3
 ip admission max-nodata-conns 3
 !
 voice-card 0
 no dspfarm
 !
 !
 !
 !
 voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 supplementary-service h450.12
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 voice translation-rule 1
 rule 1 /^3#/ //
 !
 !
 voice translation-profile strip3#
 translate called 1
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.201.3.30 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 media-type rj45
 !
 interface GigabitEthernet0/1
 ip address 172.24.200.5 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 media-type rj45
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id GK ipaddr 172.24.200.5 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id CUBE
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 3#
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.24.200.5
 !
 ip forward-protocol nd
 !
 !
 ip http server
 no ip http secure-server
 !
 !
 !
 !
 control-plane
 !
 !
 !
 dial-peer voice 12 voip
 description Incoming Dialplan
 translation-profile incoming strip3#
 session target ras
 incoming-called number .
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric!
 !
 !
 gateway
 timer receive-rtp 1200
 !
 !
 !
 !
 gatekeeper
 zone local GK 172.24.200.5
 zone remote REMOTEGK cisco.com 172.24.200.6 1719
 zone prefix GK 3*
 zone prefix REMOTEGK 5...
 zone prefix GK 6...
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 no shutdown
 !
 !
 line con 0
 line aux 0
 line vty 0 4
 password login
 !
 scheduler allocate 2 1000
 !
 end
 
 
 Remote Gatekeeper/CME
 version 12.4
 service timestamps debug datetime msec
 service timestamps log datetime msec
 no service password-encryption
 !
 hostname REMOTE
 !
 boot-start-marker
 boot system flash flash:c3845-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-25c.bin
 boot-end-marker
 !
 enable password
 !
 no aaa new-model
 voice-card 0
 no dspfarm
 !
 voice-card 1
 no dspfarm
 !
 ip cef
 !
 !
 !
 !
 ip auth-proxy max-nodata-conns 3
 ip admission max-nodata-conns 3
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 archive
 log config
  hidekeys
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip address 172.24.200.6 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 media-type rj45
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id REMOTEGK ipaddr 172.24.200.6 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id CME
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.24.200.6

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper IPIPGW

2010-08-13 Thread CCIE Voice GMAIL
Hi Matt,

I wasn't referring to outvia when used with a remote zone. 

In your configuration below you have this command:
zone local GK cisco.com x.x.x.x invia GK outvia GK enable-intrazone

I guess I just don't understand why you would need to say invia GK outvia
GK.  I normally would just simply say zone local GK cisco.com x.x.x.x and
the call would route properly.  I wanted to understand if there is some
reasoning behind putting the invia/outvia commands.  It just seems like
overkill to me.

Would you please elaborate on that command?

Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Matthew Hall [mailto:1.matt.h...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 2:31 PM
To: CCIE Voice GMAIL
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper IPIPGW

outvia sends the call to the zone specified on the way to the destination
zone (like a next hop statement in a policy routebut not really).  The
gatekeeper then just looks for a cube registered in that outvia zone.  The
cube has to have a matching inbound voip dialpeer AND a outgoing dialpeer
with a destination pattern that matches the outbound digits and session
target RAS.  The CUBE uses that dial-peer to send the call back to the
gatekeeper, the gatekeeper knows then to send the call on to the final zone
without looping back to the CUBE.

Matt

On Aug 12, 2010, at 1:19 PM, CCIE Voice GMAIL wrote:

 Hi Matt,
 
 I wanted to see what the logic was behind the zone local statement.  Is it
 good practice to do it that way (invia and outvia) for Intra-zone GK
 routing?  From what I would understand, this is almost implied by just
 saying zone local GK 
 
 Can you share with me your reasoning for doing it this way?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccieid1ot
 Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:40 AM
 To: Matthew Berry
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper IPIPGW
 
 Use this on your local GK.
 
 gatekeeper
 zone local GK cisco.com x.x.x.x invia GK outvia GK enable-intrazone
 zone remote BBGK cisco.com x.x.x.x1719
 zone prefix BBGK 01132*
 zone prefix BBGK 01144*
 no shutdown
 
 
 On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Edwin -
 You need to add the outvia command to the end of your remote zone and
 specify the zone that has your IPIPGW.
 Thanks,
 
 Matthew Berry
 ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
 http://ciscovoiceguru.com
 On Aug 11, 2010, at 7:13 PM, Edwin Dotson wrote:
 
 Sorry for all the same topic.  I have successfully got my 2 gatekeepers
 talking and calls back and fourth. But now I can't get calls to pass
 through
 the IPIPGW it sends the calls directly to the Remote Gatekeeper. To
 identify
 calls destined for the IPIPGW I have been using 3#.
 
 LOCAL GK/IPIPGW
 version 12.4
 service timestamps debug datetime msec
 service timestamps log datetime msec
 no service password-encryption
 !
 hostname LOCAL
 !
 boot-start-marker
 boot system flash flash:c3825-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-25c.bin
 boot-end-marker
 !
 enable password
 !
 no aaa new-model
 ip cef
 !
 !
 !
 !
 ip auth-proxy max-nodata-conns 3
 ip admission max-nodata-conns 3
 !
 voice-card 0
 no dspfarm
 !
 !
 !
 !
 voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 supplementary-service h450.12
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 voice translation-rule 1
 rule 1 /^3#/ //
 !
 !
 voice translation-profile strip3#
 translate called 1
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 !
 interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.201.3.30 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 media-type rj45
 !
 interface GigabitEthernet0/1
 ip address 172.24.200.5 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 media-type rj45
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id GK ipaddr 172.24.200.5 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id CUBE
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 3#
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.24.200.5
 !
 ip forward-protocol nd
 !
 !
 ip http server
 no ip http secure-server
 !
 !
 !
 !
 control-plane
 !
 !
 !
 dial-peer voice 12 voip
 description Incoming Dialplan
 translation-profile incoming strip3#
 session target ras
 incoming-called number .
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric!
 !
 !
 gateway
 timer receive-rtp 1200
 !
 !
 !
 !
 gatekeeper
 zone local GK 172.24.200.5
 zone remote REMOTEGK cisco.com 172.24.200.6 1719
 zone prefix GK 3*
 zone prefix REMOTEGK 5...
 zone prefix GK 6...
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 no shutdown
 !
 !
 line con 0
 line aux 0
 line vty 0 4
 password login
 !
 scheduler allocate 2 1000
 !
 end
 
 
 Remote Gatekeeper/CME
 version 12.4
 service timestamps debug datetime msec
 service timestamps log datetime msec
 no service password-encryption
 !
 hostname REMOTE
 !
 boot-start-marker
 boot system flash flash:c3845-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-25c.bin
 boot-end-marker
 !
 enable password
 !
 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Infrastructure Brainstorm request

2010-08-13 Thread Daniel Berlinski
Hello List

I would like to initiate a thread which I invite all of you to collaborate
sharing ideas on the following:

What would you think could break DHCP relay traffiic to succeed with the
scenario below:

(CUCM DHCP) 3750WAN-RTR WAN   WAN-RTR  Etherswitch   IP Phone

So far I can think of the following:
1- CSA enabled in CUCMs
2- Vlan access-maps in Switch
3- DHCP snooping configured in switch
4- service dhcp disabled in the branch router
5- L2/L3 problem within the network
6- ACLs in L3 interfaces along the way
7-DHCP service disabled in CUCM
8-DHCP service server/subnet page misconfiguration


I'm trying to go through all sections of the blueprint I believe I completed
100% at this stage and only practice troubleshooting scenarios.  Would be
thankful for any input

Cheers
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com