Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card....
Thank you Roger. i am using same device-line CSS approach with RP. The only difference is Route pattern. Instead of 91900XXX, i am using 91900? RP. Now ? at the end of pattern is my concern. it should match any digit string with range 91 through 919.(as per admin guide) Its not the case here in my lab. only 91900.0( or any number of zeros after dot) work. if i put any non zero digit after dot(.), it doesn't match. Thanks, Mudassar Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:03:24 -0600 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card From: roger.car...@gmail.com To: mudas...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Mudassar, Which wildcard did you use? 91X will block any number from 91[0 thru 9]. Actually this wouldn't let you type any 4th digit since it is the closest match when dialing a 900 numbers. To block 900 numbers; I would use the device-line CSS approach with RP 91900XXX in partition blocked assigned to the IP phones line CSS. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/dialplan.html#wp1150997 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Experts, while practicing volume 1 lab 5.9: block 91900? pattern for all phones. ? wild card has no effect if the number is not consecutive zeros after 91900 digit string. CUCM help says: The route pattern 91X? routes or blocks all numbers in the range 91 through 919. But I am not able to hit this pattern unless I dial consecutive zeros. Would anybody highlight its usage? Thanks, Mudassar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 57, Issue 74
I wonder if my issue this weekend on Vol 1 lab 10.1 was IOS related? Sent from my iPhone On Nov 15, 2010, at 12:33 AM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS (Rrcrumm) 2. Re: Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS (Matthew Berry) 3. Re: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 57, Issue 73 (David Lee) 4. Re: Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS (Rrcrumm) 5. Re: Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS (Rrcrumm) -- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:05:21 -0800 From: Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com To: Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS Message-ID: 5a48fe4f-53a9-4bf6-b365-b6c5f0aff...@yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi I run the auto QoS command on the hq router fine for the interface towards br2. When I run auto QoS for the interface for br1 it runs but does not create the policy map or class map. Has anyone seen this issue? Thanks Randall Sent from my iPhone On Nov 14, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: HI I am working on lab 10 wb 1 I am getting this error on the HQ router when applying auto qos to the DLCI for br1 Nov 15 04:41:49.345: %RMON-5-FALLINGTRAP: Falling trap is generated because the value of cbQosCMDropBitRate.354.12774241 has fallen below the falling-threshold value 0 Any ideas? Thanks in advance. Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101114/4d722c22/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:20:19 -0600 From: Matthew Berry matthew.be...@cdw.com To: rrcr...@yahoo.com rrcr...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS Message-ID: 84b27ada-1c66-4e60-9007-80e710f66...@cdw.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 When I was using the remote racks back in the summer, there was a known issue when using auto QOS on their equipment due to IOS version mismatch on the Proctor Labs gear. Do a show version to check. Thanks, Matthew Berry Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone. Please excuse brevity and any typo errors. - Reply message - From: Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Date: Sun, Nov 14, 2010 9:06 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS To: Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi I run the auto QoS command on the hq router fine for the interface towards br2. When I run auto QoS for the interface for br1 it runs but does not create the policy map or class map. Has anyone seen this issue? Thanks Randall Sent from my iPhone On Nov 14, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.commailto:rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: HI I am working on lab 10 wb 1 I am getting this error on the HQ router when applying auto qos to the DLCI for br1 Nov 15 04:41:49.345: %RMON-5-FALLINGTRAP: Falling trap is generated because the value of cbQosCMDropBitRate.354.12774241 has fallen below the falling-threshold value 0 Any ideas? Thanks in advance. Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.com www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101114/9ef304ec/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 3 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:20:49 -0500 From: David Lee d16...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 57, Issue 73 Message-ID: aanlktik9b81zo21sxshzc=u=-kbekk9-g+hxhqxyc...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Steve, I am working on the same thing. Assuming RSVP that it was working before WAN MLP was configured, please check a couple of things: 1) the ip rsvp bandwidth XYZ is configured under
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD caller id problem
hello expert , I have problem regarding B-ACD. when inbound call from PSTN thru FXO,it go to AA-pilot. when the agent answer the call ,it doesn't show the caller id from PSTN .it just show the AA pilot. could u help me out? the config ie below. voice-port 0/0/0 supervisory disconnect dualtone mid-call cptone CN timeouts interdigit 2 timeouts call-disconnect 1 timeouts wait-release 5 timing hookflash-out 500 connection plar opx immediate 1000 caller-id enable ! ! voice service pots ! voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip fax protocol cisco ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! voice class custom-cptone confrerence ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 // /9/ ! ! voice translation-profile +9 translate calling 1 ! ! voice-card 0 dspfarm dsp services dspfarm ! ! application service aa flash:app-b-acd-aa-3.0.0.2.tcl paramspace english index 1 param number-of-hunt-grps 4 param menu-timeout 3 param dial-by-extension-option 5 param handoff-string aa paramspace english language en param max-time-vm-retry 2 param aa-pilot 1000 paramspace english location flash: param second-greeting-time 30 param max-extension-leng 4 param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au param call-retry-timer 15 param voice-mail param max-time-call-retry 600 paramspace english prefix en param service-name queue ! service queue flash:app-b-acd-3.0.0.2.tcl param queue-len 10 param aa-hunt3 param aa-hunt4 param aa-hunt1 param aa-hunt2 param number-of-hunt-grps 4 param queue-manager-debugs 1 ! ! ! ! dial-peer voice 101 voip service aa destination-pattern 1000 session target ipv4:192.168.99.254 incoming called-number 1000 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! 2010-11-15 bruno.juniper ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence CTIGW AppUser
Hi Guys I somehow am not able to recall the Roles for the CTIGW User for Presence Desktop Control. Don't even have a SERVER Infront of me. This is the UCM Appuser. What are the roles we need to assign to it wht devices are associated to this? Kindly respond at your earliest convenience as I have my Lab in 12 hrs. Thanks Mann ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 57, Issue 74
Larry I think we had similar issue related to the iOS code level Randall Sent from my iPhone On Nov 15, 2010, at 4:47 AM, Stern, Larry larry.st...@nuvt.com wrote: I wonder if my issue this weekend on Vol 1 lab 10.1 was IOS related? Sent from my iPhone On Nov 15, 2010, at 12:33 AM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS (Rrcrumm) 2. Re: Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS (Matthew Berry) 3. Re: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 57, Issue 73 (David Lee) 4. Re: Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS (Rrcrumm) 5. Re: Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS (Rrcrumm) -- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:05:21 -0800 From: Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com To: Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS Message-ID: 5a48fe4f-53a9-4bf6-b365-b6c5f0aff...@yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi I run the auto QoS command on the hq router fine for the interface towards br2. When I run auto QoS for the interface for br1 it runs but does not create the policy map or class map. Has anyone seen this issue? Thanks Randall Sent from my iPhone On Nov 14, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: HI I am working on lab 10 wb 1 I am getting this error on the HQ router when applying auto qos to the DLCI for br1 Nov 15 04:41:49.345: %RMON-5-FALLINGTRAP: Falling trap is generated because the value of cbQosCMDropBitRate.354.12774241 has fallen below the falling-threshold value 0 Any ideas? Thanks in advance. Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101114/4d722c22/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:20:19 -0600 From: Matthew Berry matthew.be...@cdw.com To: rrcr...@yahoo.com rrcr...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS Message-ID: 84b27ada-1c66-4e60-9007-80e710f66...@cdw.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 When I was using the remote racks back in the summer, there was a known issue when using auto QOS on their equipment due to IOS version mismatch on the Proctor Labs gear. Do a show version to check. Thanks, Matthew Berry Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone. Please excuse brevity and any typo errors. - Reply message - From: Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Date: Sun, Nov 14, 2010 9:06 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 10 WB 1 question --QoS To: Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi I run the auto QoS command on the hq router fine for the interface towards br2. When I run auto QoS for the interface for br1 it runs but does not create the policy map or class map. Has anyone seen this issue? Thanks Randall Sent from my iPhone On Nov 14, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.commailto:rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: HI I am working on lab 10 wb 1 I am getting this error on the HQ router when applying auto qos to the DLCI for br1 Nov 15 04:41:49.345: %RMON-5-FALLINGTRAP: Falling trap is generated because the value of cbQosCMDropBitRate.354.12774241 has fallen below the falling-threshold value 0 Any ideas? Thanks in advance. Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.com www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101114/9ef304ec/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 3 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:20:49 -0500 From: David Lee d16...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 57, Issue 73 Message-ID: aanlktik9b81zo21sxshzc=u=-kbekk9-g+hxhqxyc...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Steve, I am working on the same
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card....
Try the ! wildcard instead. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of mudassar Khalid Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 2:51 AM To: roger.car...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card Thank you Roger. i am using same device-line CSS approach with RP. The only difference is Route pattern. Instead of 91900XXX, i am using 91900? RP. Now ? at the end of pattern is my concern. it should match any digit string with range 91 through 919.(as per admin guide) Its not the case here in my lab. only 91900.0( or any number of zeros after dot) work. if i put any non zero digit after dot(.), it doesn't match. Thanks, Mudassar _ Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:03:24 -0600 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card From: roger.car...@gmail.com To: mudas...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Mudassar, Which wildcard did you use? 91X will block any number from 91[0 thru 9]. Actually this wouldn't let you type any 4th digit since it is the closest match when dialing a 900 numbers. To block 900 numbers; I would use the device-line CSS approach with RP 91900XXX in partition blocked assigned to the IP phones line CSS. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/dialplan.html#wp1 150997 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Experts, while practicing volume 1 lab 5.9: block 91900? pattern for all phones. ? wild card has no effect if the number is not consecutive zeros after 91900 digit string. CUCM help says: The route pattern 91X? routes or blocks all numbers in the range 91 through 919. But I am not able to hit this pattern unless I dial consecutive zeros. Would anybody highlight its usage? Thanks, Mudassar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card....
I had hard time understanding ? wild card in CUCM. I believe it depends on inter digit timeout to match the pattern ( 0 or more digits) On 11/15/2010 2:51 AM, mudassar Khalid wrote: Thank you Roger. i am using same device-line CSS approach with RP. The only difference is Route pattern. Instead of 91900XXX, i am using 91900? RP. Now ? at the end of pattern is my concern. it should match any digit string with range 91 through 919.(as per admin guide) Its not the case here in my lab. only 91900.0( or any number of zeros after dot) work. if i put any non zero digit after dot(.), it doesn't match. Thanks, Mudassar Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:03:24 -0600 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card From: roger.car...@gmail.com To: mudas...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Mudassar, Which wildcard did you use? 91X will block any number from 91[0 thru 9]. Actually this wouldn't let you type any 4th digit since it is the closest match when dialing a 900 numbers. To block 900 numbers; I would use the device-line CSS approach with RP 91900XXX in partition blocked assigned to the IP phones line CSS. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/dialplan.html#wp1150997 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.com mailto:mudas...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Experts, while practicing volume 1 lab 5.9: block 91900? pattern for all phones. ? wild card has no effect if the number is not consecutive zeros after 91900 digit string. CUCM help says: The route pattern 91X? routes or blocks all numbers in the range 91 through 919. But I am not able to hit this pattern unless I dial consecutive zeros. Would anybody highlight its usage? Thanks, Mudassar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence CTIGW AppUser
Assign it cti enabled and cti control of all devices. No need to associate any device to it. Also for your end user you will need cti enabled -pavan On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Mann Chaddha mann.chad...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys I somehow am not able to recall the Roles for the CTIGW User for Presence Desktop Control. Don't even have a SERVER Infront of me. This is the UCM Appuser. What are the roles we need to assign to it wht devices are associated to this? Kindly respond at your earliest convenience as I have my Lab in 12 hrs. Thanks Mann ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEHO display E164
Fellows, What will cause international TEHO calls from HQ(MGCP) to SB(H323) not to display +sign? Ideas please. Thanks in advance. F.___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEHO display E164
Disregard. Issue resolved using translation rule. From: ondmount...@hotmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:02:52 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEHO display E164 Fellows, What will cause international TEHO calls from HQ(MGCP) to SB(H323) not to display +sign? Ideas please. Thanks in advance. F. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Devices for ExVPN
Hi all, According to Proctor Lab, if i am using hardware based solution to use their rack then i need 5 hardware Cisco IP Phones with series 7960/7961/7965. Thus anyone has used phones with series 7906/7911 or any low range phones to practice on their pod. For PSTN its ok we have use 7960/7961. Narayan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
