Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Study approach

[Rrcrumm]

Hi
I would study for CCVP because it will discuss the basics and alot more. I 
think CCNA Voice is primarily focused on CME

Randall

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 7, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Abdel el Anazi  wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> This is my first Post to this Group. Currently I'm R&S and interesting to 
> learn Voice but what is the recommended approach to study for the writing?
> 
> should I go down the road CCNA Voice CCNP Voice and Writing or can I just go 
> right a way to the Writing? if that's the case what materials to use and 
> please a recommended reading list will be great?
> 
> Thank you in advance
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Abdel el Anazi
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 198

[Akash]

Thank you for your quick reply. However that conflict with other requirement , 
no alternative ext on CUC



Akash Patel
Presales Consultant


On Jan 7, 2011, at 6:44 PM,  wrote:

You have to create an Alternative Number for that user in CUC.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of akash patel
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 2:58 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 198

 

As it relates For and By for SRST/CUFR, I tried changing VM mask to full E164, 
but then VM would not work (would get generic UC greeting).  Did someone find 
out a way around?

 

Thank you

 

From: "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 

To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sat, October 30, 2010 6:20:54 PM
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 198

Note: Forwarded message is attached.

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Vol2 Lab8 CUBE Xcoder (Brian Mulgrew)
  2. Query on Soft-Pones Features (Mann Chaddha)
  3. Re: Call Forward Unregistered (=?gbk?B?YnJ1bm8=?=)
  4. Re: Vol2 Lab8 CUBE Xcoder (Amr Sherif)
___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 198

[givemeccievoice2010]

You have to create an Alternative Number for that user in CUC.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of akash patel
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 2:58 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 198

 

As it relates For and By for SRST/CUFR, I tried changing VM mask to full
E164, but then VM would not work (would get generic UC greeting).  Did
someone find out a way around?

 

Thank you

 

  _  

From: "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com"

To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sat, October 30, 2010 6:20:54 PM
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 198

Note: Forwarded message is attached.

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Vol2 Lab8 CUBE Xcoder (Brian Mulgrew)
  2. Query on Soft-Pones Features (Mann Chaddha)
  3. Re: Call Forward Unregistered (=?gbk?B?YnJ1bm8=?=)
  4. Re: Vol2 Lab8 CUBE Xcoder (Amr Sherif)
___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 198

[akash patel]

As it relates For and By for SRST/CUFR, I tried changing VM mask to full E164, 
but then VM would not work (would get generic UC greeting).  Did someone find 
out a way around?

Thank you





From: "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 

To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sat, October 30, 2010 6:20:54 PM
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 198

Note: Forwarded message is attached.

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
    ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
    ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Vol2 Lab8 CUBE Xcoder (Brian Mulgrew)
  2. Query on Soft-Pones Features (Mann Chaddha)
  3. Re: Call Forward Unregistered (=?gbk?B?YnJ1bm8=?=)
  4. Re: Vol2 Lab8 CUBE Xcoder (Amr Sherif)
___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding subscriber problem - need ideas

[Wael Agina]

Dear All,

   Many Thanks for all for your help and ideas.

Problem solved after cisco TAC involvement buy, Re-Installing same CUCM
version, Just new installation as old image seems corrupted.

many Thanks again.

regards,
Wael Agina

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Wael Agina  wrote:

> Dear Wes,
>
>   They are on same subnet and 1st node sych to the ntp.
> The sub is not configured yet, so we cant configure its ntp.
>
> I already opened cisco TAC SR for this matter and they asked to re-install
> the image from new file, I will do that later and update this post.
>
> Many Thanks all for sharing knowledge and info.
>
>
> regards,
> Wael Agina
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Wes Ducote  wrote:
>
>> Are the two on the same subnet?
>>
>> Also have you set the clock to the sub to the same of the pub and try to
>> use the pub as ntp server?
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Wael Agina  wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Rogers,
>>>
>>>   yes it is up as i am reaching the pub over the network from another LAN
>>> subnet and it is pingable.
>>>
>>> Do I have to try reloading the pub ? Restart some services ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Wale Agina
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Rogers Ochieng >> > wrote:
>>>
 Is the default gateway up? I had this error and i just ignored it and
 proceeded


 On 26 November 2010 12:21, Wael Agina  wrote:

> Dear Rogers,
>
>   It is new installation with no DNS setup at all.
> I havent set any DNS info, and chosed no DNS during installation.
> Also when you reach to connectivity test I entered both pub Name and IP
> address.
>
> Still not working and connectivity test fails ?
>
> Regards,
> Wael Agina
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Rogers Ochieng <
> rogersochi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Off the top of my head, could it be because of DNS resolution of the
>> host name? I got that when installing recently on VMWARE and as i didn't
>> have DNS setup. I ignored it and continued to setup well
>>
>>
>> On 26 November 2010 11:40, Wael Agina  wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Jason, Shingei,
>>>
>>>   I am installing 7.0 CUCM om MCS servers.
>>> I did reset the passowrd and reload the pub after applying license.
>>>
>>> Do you have any good doc. for troubleshooting this issue ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Wael Agina
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Jason Aarons (US) <
>>> jason.aar...@us.didata.com> wrote:
>>>
  I had this problem with a recent new install of 8.0.2c (it was
 pre-installed on the hard drive on new MCS server) .   I couldn’t find
 anything wrong, the password I reset 20 times, etc.



 I upgraded the pub to 8.0.3a and did a subscriber  install with
 software update on the subscriber and it worked fine.



 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Wael Agina
 *Sent:* Thursday, November 25, 2010 5:29 PM
 *To:* Michael Dietrich
 *Cc:* OSL Group
 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding subscriber problem - need
 ideas



 Dearl Michael

   First i have applied license for two nodes and only using one and
 there is one available node on the lices [for sub]
 Also I set the name with uppercase all lettters and tried on sub
 both upper case and lower case but not working.
 I did reset security password many times to cisco12345 on pub and
 used it on sub but no sccess.

 Is there any troubleshooting steps can be done on pub during
 connectivity test on sub ?

 Regards,
 Wael Agina

 On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Michael Dietrich <
 mdd2...@gmail.com> wrote:

 Make sure that you are entering the device name of the PUB correctly
 (spelling) during the SUB set up



 Make sure the server name for SUB is spelled correctly on the PUB
 (case sensitive)...AND. that you have a second server license 
 installed
 on the PUB, to be used by the SUB





 On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Wael Agina 
 wrote:

 Hi Prashant ,

   Yes I added it on the publisher on server list and on the CM
 Group.
 But still it fails the connectivity test when installing subscriber
 software.

 Regards,
 Wael Agina



 On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Prashant Patel <
 prashantpatel...@gmail.com> wrote:

 Hi,



 Hope you have added the Sub in the list of servers on the Publishe

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called Party xformation pattern with SNR...

[mudassar Khalid]

Hi guys,Further to an October discussion on forum 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg19092.htmlwhat i 
have found in my test, Called party transformation pattern match the number 
after the RP Digit manipulation or in other words when it reaches RL. This is 
quite contradictory to my general understanding that CPTP match the number at 
the time of RP match.Here is my config:
HQ ph 1 call BR1 Ph 1  (5001 --> 1001)1001 RD 6178632863 --> RDP has CSS-SNR 
rerouting CSS that hit the only RP in PT-SNR--> 617.863 DDI predot-->  BR1 
RL--> BR1 GWpurpose of test is to change number type and number plan in called 
party transformation pattern while using SNR. If i use 617.XXX pattern, 
type remain unkown and plan remain unknown on BR1 H323 GW but change 
617.XXX CPTP to 863 will change number type national, international or 
whatever you set here. at least my test shows that.
So the question is: does Called party transformation pattern match number at 
point of RP match or in case of SNR it match after the Digit manipulation done 
by RP? or if i miss anything in the middle.
Thanks
  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Study approach

[Wilson.Samuel]

Hi Abdel,

CCNA V is an absolute help if you are a newbie to the whole Voice Saga, 
otherwise you may definitely read the CCNP-V books (syllabus) if not keen to 
take the exams and the Voice Written.

That's how I'm going :)

HTH

Kind Regards
Wilson Samuel




From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccieid1ot
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 1:58 PM
To: Abdel el Anazi
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Study approach


Any experience?  No, start from the basics.

duy
ccie #27737 voice

tmobile g2
On Jan 7, 2011 12:03 PM, "Abdel el Anazi" 
mailto:a.elan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is my first Post to this Group. Currently I'm R&S and interesting
> to learn Voice but what is the recommended approach to study for the
> writing?
>
> should I go down the road CCNA Voice CCNP Voice and Writing or can I
> just go right a way to the Writing? if that's the case what materials to
> use and please a recommended reading list will be great?
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> Regards,
>
> Abdel el Anazi
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 Pri Issue

[Wilson.Samuel]

Didnt get a chance to visit the post yesterday.

Even I struggled with this, as a H.323 GW user (I got more hands on that), I 
spent almost 2 days wondering why ISDN Multiple_Frames_Established wasn't 
showing up, the moment I made the ISDN PRI Confg (just like in a normal PRI 
Data).

But later understood that, CCM Backhaul means that L3 is backhauled to the CCM, 
and unless the CCM has the MGCP GW registered the PRI L-3  will never show up 
as Established.

Good that you got it resolved :)

Happy Labbing :)


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Deepak sidana
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 7:44 AM
To: ccievoice
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 Pri Issue

Thanx all, for your valuable inputs.

The issue is solved, my GW is registered with CCM.

Earlier i was reactivating "mgcp bind media source-interface loop0" & mgcp & 
isdn l3-binding ccm-manager

It work for me by reactivating "mgcp bind control source-interface loop0"

Thanks again for your support, cheers :)

Thanks&Rgds
Deepak Sidana.




From: Joli-coeur Wouter 
To: Deepak sidana 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Sent: Fri, 7 January, 2011 4:07:17 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 Pri Issue
There is not enough info here to troubleshoot this issue.
Post full config of br1and pstn router and tell us what you have  configured in 
cucm and what your goal is.

Your controller config is not matching your serial  interface number.
Controller 0/0/1
Serial interface 0/0/0

Reg,
Jolicoeur wouter

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 6, 2011, at 22:24, Deepak sidana 
mailto:sidana_dee...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
Hi All,

I am trying to connect the T1 from Br1-RTR to PSTN-WAN. Only when i use service 
mgcp, under controller, layer 2 isdn staus as TEI_ASSIGNED.

At PSTN-WAN Router, i am using "isdn protocol-emulate network" under s0/0/0:23

Branch1 Config:-

BR1-RTR#sh isdn sta
Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5
ISDN Serial0/0/0:23 interface
 dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5
Layer 1 Status:
 ACTIVE
Layer 2 Status:
 TEI = 0, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = TEI_ASSIGNED

!
controller T1 0/0/1
 framing esf
 linecode b8zs
 cablelength long 0db
!
interface Serial0/0/0:23
 no ip address
 encapsulation hdlc
 isdn switch-type primary-net5
 isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
 isdn incoming-voice voice
 no cdp enable

Please share you experince, if some one faced the same issue.

Thanks&Rgds
Deepak Sidana.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Max number of participants in CBarge conf call?

[Miron Kobelski]

This is what I believe. Single Button Barge enables you to barge in without
using a softkey (only by pressing the line button).
You can configure in CCM service params and/or DP whether Barge or Cbarge
should be used for this.
I configured Single Button Cbarge, but it doesn't work in Remote In Use
state (don't know why, always tries Barge).



On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 20:17, Randall Saborio  wrote:

> You mention using single button CBarge. Is it the same with regular CBarge?
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Study approach

[ccieid1ot]

Any experience?  No, start from the basics.

duy
ccie #27737 voice

tmobile g2
On Jan 7, 2011 12:03 PM, "Abdel el Anazi"  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is my first Post to this Group. Currently I'm R&S and interesting
> to learn Voice but what is the recommended approach to study for the
> writing?
>
> should I go down the road CCNA Voice CCNP Voice and Writing or can I
> just go right a way to the Writing? if that's the case what materials to
> use and please a recommended reading list will be great?
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> Regards,
>
> Abdel el Anazi
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Max number of participants in CBarge conf call? SOLVED

[Miron Kobelski]

Thanks for this positive confirmation - it inspired me ;)

It looks like there is an interesting caveat. Single button Cbarge doesn't
work when there is already Barge conf call active on the line. When I added
CBarge softkey to the "Remote In Use" state and tried to use it, I was able
to get more than 3 parties in the conference.

Randall, Mathew, thank you for your inputs!
kobel

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 04:35, Randall Saborio  wrote:

> Well, it actually worked just well. I had phone 1 barged in 2 times, so in
> the end had 4 phones on Conf initiated by CBarge.
> Perhaps could be DSPs, or if you may have any CAC configured.
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Max number of participants in CBarge conf call?

[Miron Kobelski]

Randall,

interesting. I disabled CAC during troubleshooting, still no joy.

thanks,
kobel


On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 04:35, Randall Saborio  wrote:

> Well, it actually worked just well. I had phone 1 barged in 2 times, so in
> the end had 4 phones on Conf initiated by CBarge.
> Perhaps could be DSPs, or if you may have any CAC configured.
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR with SIP Unity integration

[natan 2me]

Yes indeed. Thanks for reminding...

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Miron Kobelski  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have no doc reference, but you can do this using a Route List with your
> SIP trunk to CUC as a first option and Local Route Group (+digit
> manipulation) as a backup. works fine.
>
> AAR is only of on-cluster endpoints, whereas CUC is considered external
> system when integrated using SIP.
>
> regards
> kobel
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 16:51, natan 2me  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> With Unity Connection and UCM SIP integration, what would be the best
>> known way to reach VM pilot number from Branch Phone when AAR is triggered?
>> Both, for messages button and call forwarding to VM? Pls refer to a doc if
>> any.
>>
>> thanks, Natan
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Study approach

[Abdel el Anazi]

Hi All,

This is my first Post to this Group. Currently I'm R&S and interesting 
to learn Voice but what is the recommended approach to study for the 
writing?


should I go down the road CCNA Voice CCNP Voice and Writing or can I 
just go right a way to the Writing? if that's the case what materials to 
use and please a recommended reading list will be great?


Thank you in advance

Regards,

Abdel el Anazi
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR with SIP Unity integration

[Miron Kobelski]

Hi,

I have no doc reference, but you can do this using a Route List with your
SIP trunk to CUC as a first option and Local Route Group (+digit
manipulation) as a backup. works fine.

AAR is only of on-cluster endpoints, whereas CUC is considered external
system when integrated using SIP.

regards
kobel

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 16:51, natan 2me  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> With Unity Connection and UCM SIP integration, what would be the best known
> way to reach VM pilot number from Branch Phone when AAR is triggered? Both,
> for messages button and call forwarding to VM? Pls refer to a doc if any.
>
> thanks, Natan
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR with SIP Unity integration

[natan 2me]

Hello,

With Unity Connection and UCM SIP integration, what would be the best known
way to reach VM pilot number from Branch Phone when AAR is triggered? Both,
for messages button and call forwarding to VM? Pls refer to a doc if any.

thanks, Natan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 Pri Issue

[Deepak sidana]

Thanx all, for your valuable inputs.

The issue is solved, my GW is registered with CCM.

Earlier i was reactivating "mgcp bind media source-interface loop0" & mgcp & 
isdn l3-binding ccm-manager

It work for me by reactivating "mgcp bind control source-interface loop0" 

Thanks again for your support, cheers :)
 Thanks&Rgds
Deepak Sidana.
  





From: Joli-coeur Wouter 
To: Deepak sidana 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Sent: Fri, 7 January, 2011 4:07:17 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 Pri Issue


There is not enough info here to troubleshoot this issue.
Post full config of br1and pstn router and tell us what you have  configured in 
cucm and what your goal is. 

Your controller config is not matching your serial  interface number.
Controller 0/0/1 
Serial interface 0/0/0 

Reg,
Jolicoeur wouter

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 6, 2011, at 22:24, Deepak sidana  wrote:


Hi All,
>
>I am trying to connect the T1 from Br1-RTR to PSTN-WAN. Only when i use 
>service 
>mgcp, under controller, layer 2 isdn staus as TEI_ASSIGNED. 
>
>At PSTN-WAN Router, i am using "isdn protocol-emulate network" under s0/0/0:23
>
>Branch1 Config:-
>
>BR1-RTR#sh isdn sta
>Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5
>ISDN Serial0/0/0:23 interface
> dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5
>    Layer 1 Status:
> ACTIVE
>    Layer 2 Status:
> TEI = 0, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = TEI_ASSIGNED
>
>!
>controller T1 0/0/1
> framing esf
> linecode b8zs
> cablelength long 0db
>!
>interface Serial0/0/0:23
> no ip address
> encapsulation hdlc
> isdn switch-type primary-net5
> isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
> isdn incoming-voice voice
> no cdp enable
>
>Please share you experince, if some one faced the same issue.
> Thanks&Rgds
>Deepak Sidana.
>
>
___
>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>visit 
>www.ipexpert.com
>

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com