Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call-Forward to VM

[Ken Wyan]

Under call forward ; check CSS.

First remove  partition assigned to hunt-pilot & check again

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Jason Lee  wrote:

> All,
>
> Having a weird problem.  I have CUC integrated with CUCM via SCCP.  I'm
> able to access the CUC server by dialing the VM pilot or pressing the
> messages button on the phone.
>
> When I forward calls to VM under line configuration using the VM checkbox I
> get a fast-busy. If I uncheck the box and manually enter the VM pilot number
> it works fine.
>
> Has anyone ever run into this problem?
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fractional MGCP

[Ashraf Ayyash]

this is completly wrong  Kshitij  ,

1- the mgcp layer have nothing to do with the isdn layer even though
the l3 is binded to the ccm ,  we here talking about the B Channel not
the D-Channal so getting 500 on the AUEP doesnt mean
the mgcp gw will busy out this channel and thats exactly why we have
this service paramert in the ccm  to busy out the b-chann  and after
that you can verify this from the show perf query class of the mgcp
pri and you will see the bchannl not in use on status 2 .


2- in term of the ccie scope , this is also completey wrong , if you
have mgcp gw  question and you have been asked to use on certain
number of b-chann , what do you think they are asking you to do pri
group command and move on with 4 points  ?  or cisco doest have enough
dsp to put on the router exam ? try do show invent and you will see
what is loaded on the exam router .

finally please note that you are using / talking by the name of Cisco
TAC , even though you are not allowed do so , however at least be more
accurate on the answer you are publising here as now you bring TAC to
the game and this is not good for the TAC picture on the public
aliases .

the answer of this question is , certainly they will need you to use
the service paramater to busy out the unused channel , note also that
this is a ccie level exam so i would suggest that you always try
to find out why they asking any easy question because you will find
that this easy question is just a pointer to do something deeper which
will give the ccie program a chance to test your knowledge on a CCIE
Level .


Ash

On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Kshitij Singhi
 wrote:
> Just to add, from a CCIE scope, the IPX way is enough - we simply need to
> manually add the pri-group timeslots command with the correct number of
> channels that need to be used. Not required to modify any service parameter
> on CUCM.
> From the exams perspective, I would suggest:
> 1. Downloading the configuration from CUCM by adding the ccm-manager config
> and ccm-manager config server commands after configuring everything on CUCM.
> 2. This should add the pri-group timeslots command with 24 channels.
> 3. Shut down the voice-port/serial interface/controller and remove L3
> binding from the Serial interface
> 4. Remove the ccm-manager config/ccm-manager config server commands.
> 5. Remove the pri-g timeslots command and re-add it with the correct number
> of channels. No shut the controller and the serial interface (if
> applicable).
> 6. Manually add L3 binding on the Serial interface.
> Issue a no mgcp/mgcp
> Should be good to go.
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Kshitij Singhi
>  wrote:
>>
>> Fractional MGCP controlled PRIs are not supported by TAC. It's not
>> possible to configure a fractional PRI by downloading the config from CUCM
>> via the following commands:
>> ccm-manager config
>> ccm-manager config server 
>> However, a fractional MGCP controlled PRI works fine when the GW is
>> manually configured. To do this, we need to add the following commands on
>> the GW:
>> ccm-m mgc
>> ccm-m call-agent 
>> ccm-m redun  (If applicable)
>> controller t1 x/y/z
>> pri-g time 1-5 ser mgc (assuming 5 channels are being used - the Telco
>> will need to be configured accordingly as well)
>> int ser x/y/z:23
>> isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
>> mgcp
>> The statement "CUCM does not support a fractional MGCP controlled PRI"
>> might not be entirely accurate since CUCM definitely works great with a
>> fractional MGCP controlled PRI. I guess saying that "CUCM cannot auto
>> configure a fractional MGCP controlled PRI" would be more accurate.
>> In the case of a fractional PRI, CUCM sends AUEP messages to the GW for
>> the "unconfigured" channels on the PRI, but the GW responds with an
>> "endpoint unknown" message - hence, CUCM does not consider those channels
>> during call routing.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 11:42 AM, 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>>>        ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>        http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>        ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>        ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>   1. Re: I need hardware Vpn assistance on a session   now
>>>      (Marko Milivojevic)
>>>   2. Re: I need hardware Vpn assistance on a session   now
>>>      (pithog...@yahoo.com)
>>>   3. Re: Fractional MGCP (Robert Thomas)
>>>   4. Re: I need hardware Vpn assistance on a session   now (Rrcrumm)
>>>   5.  PREDOT DDI vs NANP:PREDOT DDI (Ken Wyan)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 13:51:5

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call-Forward to VM

[Kshitij Singhi]

Hi Jason,

Check the CFWD CSS - make sure that it has access to the partition in
question.

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:54 AM, wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from  HQ-SW? (Chris
> Martin)
>   2. Re: How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from  HQ-SW?
>  (Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice)
>   3. Call-Forward to VM (Jason Lee)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:59:02 -0500
> From: Chris Martin 
> To: Kat 
> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" ,
>Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ
>fromHQ-SW?
> Message-ID:
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Depends which traffic he is trying to mark...
>
> UDP 2427 is MGCP control
> TCP 2428 is MGCP backhaul
>
> Refer to
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/port/7_0/CCM_7.0PortList.pdf
>
> --
>
> I dropped your config on a 2821 and caught packets fine?..
>
> CorpHQ#show policy-map in fa0/0
>  FastEthernet0/0
>
>  Service-policy output: limit-mgcp
>
>Class-map: mgcp (match-all)
>  5 packets, 232 bytes
>  5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>  Match: access-group name mgcp
>  QoS Set
>dscp cs3
>  Packets marked 5
>
>Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>  148 packets, 20490 bytes
>  5 minute offered rate 3000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>  Match: any
>
> Chris
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kat  wrote:
>
> > permit tcp any any eq 2427  is incorrect, suppose to be 2428. Not sure if
> > that was a typo.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > --
> > *From:* Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice 
> > *To:* "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:42 AM
> > *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from
> > HQ-SW?
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I am trying to figure out how I can limit MGCP traffic coming from R1 on
> > the switch.
> >
> > I have attempted the following configuration:
> >
> > class-map match all mgcp
> >match access-group name mgcp
> >
> > policy-map limit-mgcp
> >class mgcp
> >  set ip dscp cs3
> >  police 8000 8000 exceed action drop
> >
> > interface GigabitEthernet 0/6
> >switchport mode trunk
> >service-policy input limit-mgcp
> >
> > ip access-list extended mgcp
> >permit udp any any eq 2427
> >permit tcp any any eq 2427
> >
> > This looks right to me but when I do "sh policy-map interface gi 0/6" I
> > never see the packets incrementing.  I can confirm that this is the only
> > port to which R1 is connected via sh cdp nei.
> >
> > Any help appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> >
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> 
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice 
> To: Mohd Baqari , Kat 
> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ
>fromHQ-SW?
> Message-ID:
><1317848749.58264.yahoomail...@web122020.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Mohd,
> Thanks for the information.
> I was missing "mls qos" from my switch configuration globally, now when I
> run "sh mls qos interface gi 0/6" I see that the policy-map is attached.
> However, I still have no way of verifying that my configuration is actually
> working (meaning matching packets, and dropping as needed).
>
> I added "permit ip any any" to the end of my access-list and applied it
> inbound on the Gi 0/6 interface and the only thing matching is my "ip any
> any" line.? I do not see any matches to the 2427 or 2428 line.
>
> Per Matthew's e-mail and link the "show policy-map interface" is not
> supported on 3750 switch:
> 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call-Forward to VM

[Ashraf Ayyash]

check what vm profile is assigned to this number , if its the default
go ahead and specify the vm profile manually


ash

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jason Lee  wrote:
> All,
>
> Having a weird problem.  I have CUC integrated with CUCM via SCCP.  I'm able
> to access the CUC server by dialing the VM pilot or pressing the messages
> button on the phone.
>
> When I forward calls to VM under line configuration using the VM checkbox I
> get a fast-busy. If I uncheck the box and manually enter the VM pilot number
> it works fine.
>
> Has anyone ever run into this problem?
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call-Forward to VM

[Jason Lee]

All,

Having a weird problem.  I have CUC integrated with CUCM via SCCP.  I'm able
to access the CUC server by dialing the VM pilot or pressing the messages
button on the phone.

When I forward calls to VM under line configuration using the VM checkbox I
get a fast-busy. If I uncheck the box and manually enter the VM pilot number
it works fine.

Has anyone ever run into this problem?


thanks,

Jason
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?

[Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice]

Hi Mohd,
Thanks for the information.
I was missing "mls qos" from my switch configuration globally, now when I run 
"sh mls qos interface gi 0/6" I see that the policy-map is attached.
However, I still have no way of verifying that my configuration is actually 
working (meaning matching packets, and dropping as needed).

I added "permit ip any any" to the end of my access-list and applied it inbound 
on the Gi 0/6 interface and the only thing matching is my "ip any any" line.  I 
do not see any matches to the 2427 or 2428 line.

Per Matthew's e-mail and link the "show policy-map interface" is not supported 
on 3750 switch:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3434098#3434098

So is there no way to verify if my configuration is correct?

HQ-SW1#sh run int gi 0/6
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 243 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/6 description Trunk to HQ
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 100,200,300
 switchport mode trunk
 ip access-group mgcp in
 mls qos trust dscp
 service-policy input limit-mgcp

end

HQ-SW1#sh access-list
Extended IP access list mgcp
    10 permit tcp any any eq 2000
    20 permit udp any eq 2427 any
    30 permit tcp any eq 2428 any
    40 permit icmp any any
    50 permit ip any any (89 matches)

HQ-SW1#sh run | begin policy-map
policy-map limit-mgcp
 class mgcp
  set ip dscp cs3
  police 8000 8000 exceed-action drop
 class class-default
  set ip dscp default
!
ip access-list extended mgcp
 permit tcp any any eq 2000
 permit udp any eq 2427 any
 permit tcp any eq 2428 any
 permit icmp any any
 permit ip any any

HQ-SW1#sh mls qos interface gi 0/6
GigabitEthernet0/6
Attached policy-map for Ingress: limit-mgcp
trust state: trust dscp
trust mode: trust dscp
trust enabled flag: ena
COS override: dis
default COS: 0
DSCP Mutation Map: Default DSCP Mutation Map
Trust device: none
qos mode: port-based

HQ-SW1#sh policy-map interface gi 0/6
 GigabitEthernet0/6

  Service-policy input: limit-mgcp

    Class-map: mgcp (match-all)
  0 packets, 0 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: access-group name mgcp

    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
  0 packets, 0 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: any
    0 packets, 0 bytes
    5 minute rate 0 bps

Thanks!




From: Mohd Baqari 
To: Kat 
Cc: Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice ; 
"ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?


In fact both ports are correct (default ports).

- Udp 2427 is used for mgcp messages.
- Tcp 2428 is used for mgcp backhaul traffic.

This mistake is ACL since those ports will be as source ports from R1 to CUCM 
and not destenation ports (destenation ports in the other direction from CUCM 
to R1). Correct ACLs should be as below.

ip access-list extended mgcp
>   permit udp any eq 2427 any
>   permit tcp any eq 2428 any

Try this and lets know the status. In between mls qos should be enabled since 
switches do qos in hardware.


Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Kat  wrote:


permit tcp any any eq 2427  is incorrect, suppose to be 2428. Not sure if that 
was a typo.
>
>Thanks.
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>From: Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice 
>To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:42 AM
>Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?
>
>
>Hi all,
>I am trying to figure out how I can limit MGCP traffic coming from R1 on the 
>switch.
>
>
>I have attempted the following configuration:
>
>
>class-map match all mgcp
>   match access-group name mgcp
>
>
>policy-map limit-mgcp
>   class mgcp
> set ip dscp cs3
> police 8000 8000 exceed action drop
>
>
>interface GigabitEthernet 0/6
>   switchport mode trunk
>   service-policy input limit-mgcp
>
>
>
>ip access-list extended mgcp
>   permit udp any any eq 2427
>   permit tcp any any eq 2427
>
>
>This looks right to me but when I do "sh policy-map interface gi 0/6" I never 
>see the packets incrementing.  I can confirm that this is the only port to 
>which R1 is connected via sh cdp nei.
>
>
>Any help appreciated.
>
>
>Thanks!
>
>___
>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
___
>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>www.PlatinumPlacement.com___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?

[Chris Martin]

Depends which traffic he is trying to mark...

UDP 2427 is MGCP control
TCP 2428 is MGCP backhaul

Refer to
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/port/7_0/CCM_7.0PortList.pdf

--

I dropped your config on a 2821 and caught packets fine?..

CorpHQ#show policy-map in fa0/0
 FastEthernet0/0

  Service-policy output: limit-mgcp

Class-map: mgcp (match-all)
  5 packets, 232 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: access-group name mgcp
  QoS Set
dscp cs3
  Packets marked 5

Class-map: class-default (match-any)
  148 packets, 20490 bytes
  5 minute offered rate 3000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
  Match: any

Chris

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kat  wrote:

> permit tcp any any eq 2427  is incorrect, suppose to be 2428. Not sure if
> that was a typo.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice 
> *To:* "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:42 AM
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from
> HQ-SW?
>
> Hi all,
> I am trying to figure out how I can limit MGCP traffic coming from R1 on
> the switch.
>
> I have attempted the following configuration:
>
> class-map match all mgcp
>match access-group name mgcp
>
> policy-map limit-mgcp
>class mgcp
>  set ip dscp cs3
>  police 8000 8000 exceed action drop
>
> interface GigabitEthernet 0/6
>switchport mode trunk
>service-policy input limit-mgcp
>
> ip access-list extended mgcp
>permit udp any any eq 2427
>permit tcp any any eq 2427
>
> This looks right to me but when I do "sh policy-map interface gi 0/6" I
> never see the packets incrementing.  I can confirm that this is the only
> port to which R1 is connected via sh cdp nei.
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?

[Mohd Baqari]

In fact both ports are correct (default ports).

- Udp 2427 is used for mgcp messages.
- Tcp 2428 is used for mgcp backhaul traffic.

This mistake is ACL since those ports will be as source ports from R1 to CUCM 
and not destenation ports (destenation ports in the other direction from CUCM 
to R1). Correct ACLs should be as below.

> ip access-list extended mgcp
>permit udp any eq 2427 any
>permit tcp any eq 2428 any

Try this and lets know the status. In between mls qos should be enabled since 
switches do qos in hardware.


Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Kat  wrote:

> permit tcp any any eq 2427  is incorrect, suppose to be 2428. Not sure if 
> that was a typo.
> 
> Thanks.
>   
> 
> From: Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice 
> To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:42 AM
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?
> 
> Hi all,
> I am trying to figure out how I can limit MGCP traffic coming from R1 on the 
> switch.
> 
> I have attempted the following configuration:
> 
> class-map match all mgcp
>match access-group name mgcp
> 
> policy-map limit-mgcp
>class mgcp
>  set ip dscp cs3
>  police 8000 8000 exceed action drop
> 
> interface GigabitEthernet 0/6
>switchport mode trunk
>service-policy input limit-mgcp
> 
> ip access-list extended mgcp
>permit udp any any eq 2427
>permit tcp any any eq 2427
> 
> This looks right to me but when I do "sh policy-map interface gi 0/6" I never 
> see the packets incrementing.  I can confirm that this is the only port to 
> which R1 is connected via sh cdp nei.
> 
> Any help appreciated.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] translation-profile under call-manager-fallback

[Mohd Baqari]

What number are you trying to dial from SRST phone and what is the calling 
number recived on SRST gateway when you are dialing to SRST phones.

debug voice translations and share the output.

Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 5, 2011, at 7:27 PM, Gerence Guan  wrote:

> Hi
>  
> Any one have experience to configure translation-profile under 
> call-manager-fallback?
> For me it seems NOT working at all.
>  
> what I try to do is :
> when phone in STST,
> prefix 0 on calling # for calls from SIP trunk to SRST phone
> drop 0 on called # for calls from SRST phone to SIP trunk
>  
> voice translation-rule 8
>  rule 1 /^0\(.*\)/ /\1/
> voice translation-rule 9
>  rule 1 /^\(.*\)/ /0\1/
> voice translation-profile From-SRST-Phone
>  translate called 8
> voice translation-profile To-SRST-Phone
>  translate calling 9
> dial-peer voice 550 voip
>  preference 1
>  destination-pattern .T
>  session protocol sipv2
>  session target ipv4:172.2.0.2
>  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
>  codec g711alaw
>  no vad
> dial-peer voice 511 voip
>  description Traffic to UCM-Pub
>  preference 1
>  destination-pattern 03987631..$
>  voice-class codec 1
>  session protocol sipv2
>  session target ipv4:10.10.210.10
>  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
>  no vad
>  
> call-manager-fallback
>  secondary-dialtone 0
>  max-conferences 4 gain -6
>  transfer-system full-consult
>  timeouts interdigit 3
>  ip source-address 10.10.110.1 port 2000
>  max-ephones 40
>  max-dn 80 dual-line preference 8
>  system message primary Network failure. Fallback mode.
>  system message secondary Fallback mode
>  dialplan-pattern 1 03987631.. extension-length 4
>  transfer-pattern .T
>  translation-profile incoming From-SRST-Phone
>  translation-profile outgoing To-SRST-Phone
>  call-forward busy 3100
>  call-forward noan 3100 timeout 8
>  moh music-on-hold.au
>  multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 10.10.110.1
>  time-zone 48
>  time-format 24
>  date-format dd-mm-yy
>  
> Gerence
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?

[Mathew Miller]

Show policy-map interface is not supported on 3750. You must use show mls
qos interface  statistics.

https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3434098#3434098


From:  Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice 
Reply-To:  Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice 
Date:  Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
To:  "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Subject:  [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?

Hi all,
I am trying to figure out how I can limit MGCP traffic coming from R1 on the
switch.

I have attempted the following configuration:

class-map match all mgcp
   match access-group name mgcp

policy-map limit-mgcp
   class mgcp
 set ip dscp cs3
 police 8000 8000 exceed action drop

interface GigabitEthernet 0/6
   switchport mode trunk
   service-policy input limit-mgcp

ip access-list extended mgcp
   permit udp any any eq 2427
   permit tcp any any eq 2427

This looks right to me but when I do "sh policy-map interface gi 0/6" I
never see the packets incrementing.  I can confirm that this is the only
port to which R1 is connected via sh cdp nei.

Any help appreciated.

Thanks!
___ For more information
regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?

[Kat]

permit tcp any any eq 2427  is incorrect, suppose to be 2428. Not sure if that 
was a typo.

Thanks.

  




From: Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice 
To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:42 AM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?


Hi all,
I am trying to figure out how I can limit MGCP traffic coming from R1 on the 
switch.

I have attempted the following configuration:

class-map match all mgcp
   match access-group name mgcp

policy-map limit-mgcp
   class mgcp
 set ip dscp cs3
 police 8000 8000 exceed action drop

interface GigabitEthernet 0/6
   switchport mode trunk
   service-policy input limit-mgcp


ip access-list extended mgcp
   permit udp any any eq 2427
   permit tcp any any eq 2427

This looks right to me but when I do "sh policy-map interface gi 0/6" I never 
see the packets incrementing.  I can confirm that this is the only port to 
which R1 is connected via sh cdp nei.

Any help appreciated.

Thanks!

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from HQ-SW?

[Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice]

Hi all,
I am trying to figure out how I can limit MGCP traffic coming from R1 on the 
switch.

I have attempted the following configuration:

class-map match all mgcp
   match access-group name mgcp

policy-map limit-mgcp
   class mgcp
 set ip dscp cs3
 police 8000 8000 exceed action drop

interface GigabitEthernet 0/6
   switchport mode trunk
   service-policy input limit-mgcp


ip access-list extended mgcp
   permit udp any any eq 2427
   permit tcp any any eq 2427

This looks right to me but when I do "sh policy-map interface gi 0/6" I never 
see the packets incrementing.  I can confirm that this is the only port to 
which R1 is connected via sh cdp nei.

Any help appreciated.

Thanks!
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec. not working -SOLVED-

[Mohd Baqari]

Usually I would refer to CME SRND

Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 5, 2011, at 4:27 PM, "Robert Schuknecht"  wrote:

> Mohammed,
> 
>  
> 
> do you know any good document which describes the timers and their 
> relationship?
> 
>  
> 
> /Robert
> 
>  
> 
> Von: Mohammed Al baqari [mailto:baqari.voic...@gmail.com] 
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2011 13:30
> An: Robert Schuknecht
> Cc: Geoghegan, Stuart; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec. 
> not working -SOLVED-
> 
>  
> 
> Not exactly  This depends on ephone-hunt timeout settings
> 
> When the phones (agents) started ringing, i.e. call is submitted from AA to 
> ephone-hunt, ephone-hunt timers will be used and not script timers 
> 
> Keep this in mind
> 
> Regards,
> Mohammed Al Baqari
> 
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Robert Schuknecht  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> thanks to all who have responded. I did some more testing and some more 
> reading. I found out that the command “param max-time-call-retry 90” takes 
> only place when the Hunt-Group phones are currently busy. If they are ringing 
> and the call gets back to the script because of no answer, the call will be 
> redirected after approx.. 3 Min.
> 
>  
> 
> /Robert
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Von: Geoghegan, Stuart [mailto:stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk] 
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011 17:06
> An: Robert Schuknecht; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Betreff: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec. 
> not working
> 
>  
> 
> Hi Robert,
> 
>  
> 
> Is 3210 a pilot point in a hunt group that has a “final” parameter set to 
> 3001 also?
> 
>  
> 
> If so, I believe that this conflicts with your B-ACD so try removing the 
> final parameter from your hunt group.
> 
>  
> 
> Vik mentions something along these lines in an blog on B-ACD on IPX website,
> 
>  
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>  
> 
> Stuart
> 
>  
> 
> From: Robert Schuknecht [mailto:rschukne...@gmx.de] 
> Sent: 04 October 2011 15:49
> To: Geoghegan, Stuart; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: AW: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec. 
> not working
> 
>  
> 
> Hi Stuart,
> 
>  
> 
> yes, the command „param max-time-call-retry 9” was a copy/paste error. In the 
> RTR config it is stated as “param max-time-call-retry 90”. But, the call 
> redirect takes place only after a few minutes as opposed to 90 Sec.
> 
>  
> 
> /Robert
> 
>  
> 
> Von: Geoghegan, Stuart [mailto:stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk] 
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011 16:12
> An: Robert Schuknecht; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Betreff: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec. 
> not working
> 
>  
> 
> Hi Robert
> 
>  
> 
> I think that your
> 
>  
> 
>   param max-time-call-retry 9
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> should be
> 
>  
> 
>   param max-time-call-retry 90
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> kind regards
> 
>  
> 
> Stuart
> 
>  
> 
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Robert Schuknecht
> Sent: 04 October 2011 13:30
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec. not 
> working
> 
>  
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> In WB 1 Question 9.2 asks us that in incoming call, into the AA 3500, should 
> be redirected to 3001 after 90 Sec. of Ringing. I configured the BACD 
> according to the PG but the call will be redirected after approx.. 3 Min and 
> not after 90 Sec.
> 
>  
> 
> Here is the relevant configuration:
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> application
> 
> service queue flash://bacdprompts/app-b-acd-2.1.2.2.tcl
> 
>   param queue-len 15
> 
>   param aa-hunt10 3006
> 
>   param number-of-hunt-grps 2
> 
>   param aa-hunt2 3210
> 
>   param queue-manager-debugs 1
> 
> !
> 
> service aa1 flash://bacdprompts/app-b-acd-aa-2.1.2.2.tcl
> 
>   paramspace english index 1
> 
>   param aa-pilot 3500
> 
>   param number-of-hunt-grps 2
> 
>   param handoff-string aa1
> 
>   paramspace english language en
> 
>   param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au
> 
>   param call-retry-timer 15
> 
>   param service-name queue
> 
>   paramspace english location flash://bacdprompts/
> 
>   param second-greeting-time 60
> 
>   param max-time-vm-retry 2
> 
>   param voice-mail 3001
> 
>   param max-time-call-retry 9
> 
>  
> 
> Any help is appreciated!
> 
>  
> 
> /Robert
> 
>  
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail (and attachments) is confidential. 
> It must not be read, copied, disclosed, printed, forwarded, relied upon or 
> used by any person other than the intended recipient. Unauthorised use, 
> disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> e-mail in error immediately contact the sender and postmas...@ngbailey.co.uk 
> then permanently delete it and any attachments. NG Bailey may monitor email 
> where it is considered proportionate to any perceived risk. This email has 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] translation-profile under call-manager-fallback

[Gerence Guan]

Hi

Any one have experience to configure translation-profile under
call-manager-fallback?
For me it seems NOT working at all.

what I try to do is :
when phone in STST,
prefix 0 on calling # for calls from SIP trunk to SRST phone
drop 0 on called # for calls from SRST phone to SIP trunk

voice translation-rule 8
 rule 1 /^0\(.*\)/ /\1/
voice translation-rule 9
 rule 1 /^\(.*\)/ /0\1/
voice translation-profile From-SRST-Phone
 translate called 8
voice translation-profile To-SRST-Phone
 translate calling 9
dial-peer voice 550 voip
 preference 1
 destination-pattern .T
 session protocol sipv2
 session target ipv4:172.2.0.2
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 codec g711alaw
 no vad
dial-peer voice 511 voip
 description Traffic to UCM-Pub
 preference 1
 destination-pattern 03987631..$
 voice-class codec 1
 session protocol sipv2
 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 no vad

call-manager-fallback
 secondary-dialtone 0
 max-conferences 4 gain -6
 transfer-system full-consult
 timeouts interdigit 3
 ip source-address 10.10.110.1 port 2000
 max-ephones 40
 max-dn 80 dual-line preference 8
 system message primary Network failure. Fallback mode.
 system message secondary Fallback mode
 dialplan-pattern 1 03987631.. extension-length 4
 transfer-pattern .T
 translation-profile incoming From-SRST-Phone
 translation-profile outgoing To-SRST-Phone
 call-forward busy 3100
 call-forward noan 3100 timeout 8
 moh music-on-hold.au
 multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 10.10.110.1
 time-zone 48
 time-format 24
 date-format dd-mm-yy

Gerence
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec. not working -SOLVED-

[Robert Schuknecht]

Mohammed,

 

do you know any good document which describes the timers and their
relationship?

 

/Robert

 

Von: Mohammed Al baqari [mailto:baqari.voic...@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2011 13:30
An: Robert Schuknecht
Cc: Geoghegan, Stuart; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec.
not working -SOLVED-

 

Not exactly  This depends on ephone-hunt timeout settings

When the phones (agents) started ringing, i.e. call is submitted from AA to
ephone-hunt, ephone-hunt timers will be used and not script timers 

Keep this in mind

Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Robert Schuknecht 
wrote:

Hi,

 

thanks to all who have responded. I did some more testing and some more
reading. I found out that the command "param max-time-call-retry 90" takes
only place when the Hunt-Group phones are currently busy. If they are
ringing and the call gets back to the script because of no answer, the call
will be redirected after approx.. 3 Min.

 

/Robert

 

 

Von: Geoghegan, Stuart [mailto:stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011 17:06
An: Robert Schuknecht; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Betreff: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec.
not working

 

Hi Robert,

 

Is 3210 a pilot point in a hunt group that has a "final" parameter set to
3001 also?

 

If so, I believe that this conflicts with your B-ACD so try removing the
final parameter from your hunt group.

 

Vik mentions something along these lines in an blog on B-ACD on IPX website,

 

Kind regards

 

Stuart

 

From: Robert Schuknecht [mailto:rschukne...@gmx.de] 
Sent: 04 October 2011 15:49
To: Geoghegan, Stuart; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: AW: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec.
not working

 

Hi Stuart,

 

yes, the command "param max-time-call-retry 9" was a copy/paste error. In
the RTR config it is stated as "param max-time-call-retry 90". But, the call
redirect takes place only after a few minutes as opposed to 90 Sec.

 

/Robert

 

Von: Geoghegan, Stuart [mailto:stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011 16:12
An: Robert Schuknecht; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Betreff: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec.
not working

 

Hi Robert

 

I think that your 

 

  param max-time-call-retry 9

 

 

should be 

 

  param max-time-call-retry 90

 

 

kind regards

 

Stuart

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Schuknecht
Sent: 04 October 2011 13:30
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec. not
working

 

Hi, 

 

In WB 1 Question 9.2 asks us that in incoming call, into the AA 3500, should
be redirected to 3001 after 90 Sec. of Ringing. I configured the BACD
according to the PG but the call will be redirected after approx.. 3 Min and
not after 90 Sec.

 

Here is the relevant configuration:

 

 

application

service queue flash://bacdprompts/app-b-acd-2.1.2.2.tcl

  param queue-len 15

  param aa-hunt10 3006

  param number-of-hunt-grps 2

  param aa-hunt2 3210

  param queue-manager-debugs 1

!

service aa1 flash://bacdprompts/app-b-acd-aa-2.1.2.2.tcl

  paramspace english index 1

  param aa-pilot 3500

  param number-of-hunt-grps 2

  param handoff-string aa1

  paramspace english language en

  param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au

  param call-retry-timer 15

  param service-name queue

  paramspace english location flash://bacdprompts/

  param second-greeting-time 60

  param max-time-vm-retry 2

  param voice-mail 3001

  param max-time-call-retry 9

 

Any help is appreciated!

 

/Robert

 

The information contained in this e-mail (and attachments) is confidential.
It must not be read, copied, disclosed, printed, forwarded, relied upon or
used by any person other than the intended recipient. Unauthorised use,
disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error immediately contact the sender and postmas...@ngbailey.co.uk
then permanently delete it and any attachments. NG Bailey may monitor email
where it is considered proportionate to any perceived risk. This email has
been sent on behalf of an NG Bailey company, if in doubt ask the sender to
clarify which company.  The NG Bailey companies include NG Bailey Limited
(342778), NG Bailey IT Services Limited (2338401), NG Bailey Facilities
Services Limited (5472032), Kedington (Northern Ireland) Limited (NI 31145)
and NG Bailey Group Limited (1490238).  All of the companies, except
Kedington (Northern Ireland) Limited, are registered in England with
registered office at Denton Hall Ilkley West Yorkshire LS29 0HH.  Kedington
(Northern Ireland) Limited is registered in Northern Ireland and its
registered office is c/o Carson McDowell, Murray House

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec. not working -SOLVED-

[Mohammed Al baqari]

Not exactly  This depends on ephone-hunt timeout settings

When the phones (agents) started ringing, i.e. call is submitted from AA to
ephone-hunt, ephone-hunt timers will be used and not script timers 

Keep this in mind

Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Robert Schuknecht wrote:

> Hi,
>
> ** **
>
> thanks to all who have responded. I did some more testing and some more
> reading. I found out that the command “param max-time-call-retry 90” takes
> only place when the Hunt-Group phones are currently busy. If they are
> ringing and the call gets back to the script because of no answer, the call
> will be redirected after approx.. 3 Min.
>
> ** **
>
> /Robert
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *Von:* Geoghegan, Stuart [mailto:stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk]
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011 17:06
> *An:* Robert Schuknecht; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Betreff:* RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90
> Sec. not working
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> ** **
>
> Is 3210 a pilot point in a hunt group that has a “final” parameter set to
> 3001 also?
>
> ** **
>
> If so, I believe that this conflicts with your B-ACD so try removing the
> final parameter from your hunt group.
>
> ** **
>
> Vik mentions something along these lines in an blog on B-ACD on IPX
> website,
>
> ** **
>
> Kind regards
>
> ** **
>
> Stuart
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Robert Schuknecht [mailto:rschukne...@gmx.de]
> *Sent:* 04 October 2011 15:49
> *To:* Geoghegan, Stuart; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* AW: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90
> Sec. not working
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Stuart,
>
> ** **
>
> yes, the command „param max-time-call-retry 9” was a copy/paste error. In
> the RTR config it is stated as “param max-time-call-retry 90”. But, the call
> redirect takes place only after a few minutes as opposed to 90 Sec.
>
> ** **
>
> /Robert
>
> ** **
>
> *Von:* Geoghegan, Stuart [mailto:stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk]
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011 16:12
> *An:* Robert Schuknecht; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Betreff:* RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90
> Sec. not working
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Robert
>
> ** **
>
> I think that your 
>
> ** **
>
>   param max-time-call-retry 9
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> should be 
>
> ** **
>
>   param max-time-call-retry 90
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> kind regards
>
> ** **
>
> Stuart
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Robert
> Schuknecht
> *Sent:* 04 October 2011 13:30
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB1 LAB 9A BACD: Call Redirect after 90 Sec.
> not working
>
> ** **
>
> Hi, 
>
> ** **
>
> In WB 1 Question 9.2 asks us that in incoming call, into the AA 3500,
> should be redirected to 3001 after 90 Sec. of Ringing. I configured the BACD
> according to the PG but the call will be redirected after approx.. 3 Min and
> not after 90 Sec.
>
> ** **
>
> Here is the relevant configuration:
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> application
>
> service queue flash://bacdprompts/app-b-acd-2.1.2.2.tcl
>
>   param queue-len 15
>
>   param aa-hunt10 3006
>
>   param number-of-hunt-grps 2
>
>   param aa-hunt2 3210
>
>   param queue-manager-debugs 1
>
> !
>
> service aa1 flash://bacdprompts/app-b-acd-aa-2.1.2.2.tcl
>
>   paramspace english index 1
>
>   param aa-pilot 3500
>
>   param number-of-hunt-grps 2
>
>   param handoff-string aa1
>
>   paramspace english language en
>
>   param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au
>
>   param call-retry-timer 15
>
>   param service-name queue
>
>   paramspace english location flash://bacdprompts/
>
>   param second-greeting-time 60
>
>   param max-time-vm-retry 2
>
>   param voice-mail 3001
>
>   param max-time-call-retry 9
>
> ** **
>
> Any help is appreciated!
>
> ** **
>
> /Robert
>
> ** **
>
> The information contained in this e-mail (and attachments) is confidential.
> It must not be read, copied, disclosed, printed, forwarded, relied upon or
> used by any person other than the intended recipient. Unauthorised use,
> disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> e-mail in error immediately contact the sender and
> postmas...@ngbailey.co.uk then permanently delete it and any attachments.
> NG Bailey may monitor email where it is considered proportionate to any
> perceived risk. This email has been sent on behalf of an NG Bailey company,
> if in doubt ask the sender to clarify which company.  The NG Bailey
> companies include NG Bailey Limited (342778), NG Bailey IT Services Limited
> (2338401), NG Bailey Facilities Services Limited (5472032), Kedington
> (Northern Ireland) Limited (NI 31145) and NG Bailey Group Limited
> (1