Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Plus Dialing

[Ken Wyan]

This is a limitation with CME- and the same applies for 79XX phones
registered to CME too.


Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.


Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com








- Hide quoted text -
On Oct 24, 2011, at 6:23 AM, Ken Wyan wrote:


- Hide quoted text -
I have CIPC registered to CUCME. PSTN gateway is sending full e164 number
with + sign ( caller-id for incoming calls).

But in my CIPC main display from field doesn't show + sign (but all digits
in number are shown). In same CIPC bottom of the display (in small size) it
shows full number with + sign.

If I register CIPC to CUCM , then both numbers show correctly with leading
+ sign.

How can I correct this?

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Emanuel Damasceno wrote:

> Hmm
>
> Have you tried:
> translation rule XX
> rule 1 /^1/ /+1/
>
> translation-profile 1
> translate calling 1
>
> voice-port x/x/x:x
> translation-profile incoming 1
>
> If you did, and didn't work, I am gonna start trying this out here...
> Cheers
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>
>
>
>
>   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:12 PM, datucha123 datucha123 <
> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> How can I force CUCME IP Phones to display the Numbers in Missed/Received
>> calls directory with + sign?
>>
>> When the call comes to CUCME with Caller ID with +, the CUCME IP Phone
>> dislpays that + sign in lower place of the screen. But in the Directories
>> (Missed/Received) calls, that number is listed without +.
>>
>> So how can I configure the CUCME not to strip the + sign from the Calling
>> Number, and also display that sign in Directories (Missed/Received) calls?
>>
>> On CUCM, I do not have a problem, the + sign is listed in the
>> Missed/Received calls, but as for CUCME I cannot make it working.
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] User Import to Unity Connection from CallManager

[Ken Wyan]

Hi Guys,

I have a very basic question with manually created users in CUCM. ( *No* AD
or LDAP integration)

When integrating CUCM with CUC in the exam , is it sufficient to import
users from CUCM to CUC  or  need to Sync users after importing ?

I saw in a CCIE video ,  user import & sync both to be done in order.

As mentioned in cisco docs , sync is required if any later change is done
to CUCM users.

Do you normally do both user import & user sync both or  do import only?

Thanks

Ken
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Automated Reply Re: "CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 69, Issue 162"

[stewart . mcfarlane]

This is an automated reply to your message "CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 69, Issue 
162" sent to stewart.mcfarl...@provista-uk.com.

Dear ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

Thank you for your email.  

Please note that due to unforseen circumstances I will be out of the office for 
the rest of this week (w/c 17/10/11).

If you require any assistance please contact the provista office on 
08456424642.  For technical assistance please contact 
serviced...@provista-uk.com.

Thanks

Stewart
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] called party xlate on gw question

[Joel Tyson]

I have a scenarios where I want to push most if not all of the called party
transformations onto the gateway (HQ).   When I configure a route pattern
on BR1 for TEHO to HQ I see the call hit the  HQ gw but the called party
xforms are not taking place.  HQ works fine.   The called party css is
applied on the GW so shouldn't that affect any call going out thae GW?
The only difference with HQ is the RP is pointing to a standary local RL
opposed to BR1 pointing to a newly created RL.   I can make this work by
adding the manipulations to the new RL but I am curios why this isn't
working.   Thanks for any input.

-Joel
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dialed Display Number.

[Gurpreet Singh Kukreja]

Hi,

This depends on what is asked in the Lab. If the lab tells you to display
10 digit number then you do it otherwise you don't.

Logically, a user when dials a 7 digit number has no idea where the call is
going from. For him, he is dialing a 7 digit #. So ideally, it should
always display 7 digit called # in this situation.

If nothing is mentioned in lab, i would leave it to 7 digit called #.

HTH


Regards
Gurpreet

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Pradeep Kumar Sharma <
sonu.netwo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Guys,
>
> Do we really have to take care of dialed display number on the phone while
> call is rerouting to the secondary path in CCIE Lab.
>
> For Example:
>
> "HQ phone should be able make Local Calls. If HQ gateway is not available,
> the call should reroute via BR1 Gateway."
>
> HQ local number is : 394-2XXX(+1-212-394-2XXX).
>
> While rerouting this call via BR1, we have to prefix this number with 1212
> in RL/RG . (91212 in case BR1 is H.323)
>
> At this point the dialed display number on the phone will automatically
> change from 393-2XXX to 12123942XXX or something like that.
>
> I know we can take care of it using no supplementary command and route
> pattern.
>
> But my question is , do we really have to worry about this ?
>
>
> -SONU-
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Plus Dialing

[Emanuel Damasceno]

Hmm

Have you tried:
translation rule XX
rule 1 /^1/ /+1/

translation-profile 1
translate calling 1

voice-port x/x/x:x
translation-profile incoming 1

If you did, and didn't work, I am gonna start trying this out here...
Cheers
*Emanuel Damasceno*




On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:12 PM, datucha123 datucha123  wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> How can I force CUCME IP Phones to display the Numbers in Missed/Received
> calls directory with + sign?
>
> When the call comes to CUCME with Caller ID with +, the CUCME IP Phone
> dislpays that + sign in lower place of the screen. But in the Directories
> (Missed/Received) calls, that number is listed without +.
>
> So how can I configure the CUCME not to strip the + sign from the Calling
> Number, and also display that sign in Directories (Missed/Received) calls?
>
> On CUCM, I do not have a problem, the + sign is listed in the
> Missed/Received calls, but as for CUCME I cannot make it working.
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC VM Mask

[Chris Martin]

Since these are registered with CME and not associated phones with CUCM in
any way, I am not sure the voice mail profile is invoked since that is tied
to a line.  I don't think I have tested CME phones locally registered
redirecting into CUCM/CUC without SRST involved.  One option would be a
voice-translation rule that strips the RDNIS to 4 digits, then associate
this to a dial-peer going to voicemail.

Chris

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM, datucha123 datucha123  wrote:

> Yes, sure, it is enabled on the Incoming Gateway.
>
> I have also noticed that the Voice Mail Box Mask is working only for the
> CUCM Registered IP Phones. It transforms the Redirecting and Calling Number
> as necessary. But when the IP Phone, that is not registered with CUCM
> (CUCME IP Phones) is redirecting the call to CUC, that Transformation does
> not work :(
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Chris Martin  wrote:
>
>> At a glance your config seems fine and it should work as you intend.  I
>> assume you also allowed incoming redirecting number for the CUCM gateway?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:38 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
>> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>   Hello,
>>>
>>> I have configured the Voice Mail Box Mask for  (As I know, this will
>>> transform the Redricting Number to last 4 digits).
>>>
>>> but somehow it does not work :(
>>>
>>> So here what is happening:
>>>
>>> I have configure the User and VM Box in CUC for CUCME IP Phone, (ext
>>> 3012). I have configure the Call Forward All on CUCME IP Phone to CUC VM
>>> Pilot through the PSTN (0001911444888)
>>>
>>> Also configured the Voice Mail Box Mask for VM Porfile to .
>>>
>>> CUCME IP Phone has also the DialPlan pattern assigned, so that the
>>> Caller ID is 2553012.
>>>
>>> CUCME IP Phone is calling CUC through the PRI PSTN. (I enabled the
>>> Redirecting IE on PR interfaces).
>>>
>>> Also I have enabled the "call-forward system redirect" in
>>> Telephony-service, so that the redirecting number will be expanded based on
>>> the DialPlan pattern.
>>>
>>> So now when the some Phone calls this CUCME IP Phones (That has CFWDALL
>>> to CUC PILOT NUMBER Through PSTN) the caller hears the AA Greeting instead
>>> of Voice Mail leaving greeting.
>>>
>>> So as I guess the Voice Mail Box Mask transformation is not working.
>>>
>>> Maybe I am missing something?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>>
>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity VM Box Creation

[Chris Martin]

Try removing "CCMSysUser" and only have your axl admin user in there.  If
that doesn't work restart your axl web servers on both devices.  I just had
time to run through it and worked fine for me.  When I had both users I got
the same error you are.

Chris

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:15 PM, datucha123 datucha123  wrote:

> Yes, I have that user "admin" (Just in my case it is called
> "CCMAdministrator"), and this user is also configured in CUC Phone System.
> But still no success :(
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Chris Martin  wrote:
>
>> Been a while since I tested pushing unity users through CUCM, but I
>> thought you had to set the application user to an axl enabled user that is
>> also set in unity connection phone system.  IE: admin.
>>
>> I may be wrong.. Has been a while since I tried that and I don't have
>> access to my lab right now.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:20 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
>> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>   I am trying to create the Voice Mail Box for the User from the CUCM
>>> directly, meaning that I am going into Line configuration and then
>>> selecting the "Create Voice Mail Box" from the upper right corner.
>>>
>>> But when I choose the User Template (it is visible in CUCM when adding
>>> the VM Box) and click SAVE, it gaves me an error:"   *Unmapped
>>> Exception (401)Unauthorized*"
>>>
>>> Thus I have changed the Name in Application Server to IP address, and
>>> assigned the CUCM Administrator and CCMSysUser as the Selected Application
>>> Users for CUC Server.
>>>
>>> Also has unset the "Voice Mail Box Mask" in the VM Profile (as the CUCM
>>> 7.0 has BUG related to that).
>>>
>>> But still I got that error when tryin to add a VM Box from CUCM Device
>>> Line configuration.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>>
>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DDI NANP:Predot

[Emanuel Damasceno]

That's the kind of answer I wanted to hear, however, the Help Pages from
CUCM are a good idea as well.

All my projects with CUCM were NON-NANP, that's why I had this question in
my head. I almost blew my head off trying to figure out how to use
Globalization and Localization here in Brazil. We dial 0 for outside line,
8 numbers for local, 00+12 for long distance (where it's 0 outiside 0 XX <-
Long Distance Carrier, XX for State code and the remaining 8 digits for the
number), and the international, that goes 000 + carrier (2 digits) + ! (or
T in H323).

We have to specify carriers according to what the customer wants. Sometimes
they have plans with all the carriers here in Brazil. Picture that...

And in some cases we are required to use the Long Distance code, for local
and the same for long distance. For example: Here in Sao Paulo, my number
is "11-" If I call anybody in Sao Paulo, I only dial 8 digits. If I
am dialing another city with the same long distance code (11), you have to
dial the whole long distance plan (mentioned above) for a call that is not
long distance. So, each calling city has its own rule depending on the
calling number.

Now for the Missed/Received calls directory dial, imagine all I just
mentioned above. We have to create many route patterns or tranlations to
localize each city/zone. Pretty messed up, but good experience. I only used
Predot so far. I started using Predot Trailing # after I started studying
for my CCIE exam. Just being curious about the NANP:Predot

Thanks for the info Adam, it's now "clear as mud!" =)

Ashwani,

Inside Route Patterns, Calling/ed Transformation Patterns and Route Lists =)

*Emanuel Damasceno*




On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Adam Thompson  wrote:

> The reason that it says NANP:Predot is because by default the NANP
> dial-plan is installed. If you were to install the AMNP dial-plan it would
> say AMNP:Predot. It would then follow the rules outlined in that specific
> dial plan to transform the number in the Route List. The other 'Predot' DDI
> on the route pattern does not follow any specific dial-plan rules. It only
> acts on the digit string that matches.
>
> Clear as mud?
>
> HTH
> -Adam
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Emanuel Damasceno 
> wrote:
>
>> It's cool. I just wanted to know what it means. I know NANP stands for
>> North American Numbering Plan, but why NANP:Predot? It probably has a
>> difference, otherwise it wouldn't have "Predot" and "NANP:Predot", the same
>> way there is "Predot Trailing-#" which means "Predot until the caller dials
>> #"
>>
>> It must have a meaning and I wanna know :D If you guys could point me to
>> any documents that explain this, I'd appreciate it.
>>
>> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:45 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
>> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I do not know what does that mean, but do not worry.
>>>
>>> There will no NANP on the CCIE exam, as I know.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Emanuel Damasceno <
>>> aedamasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Thanks Datucha.

 I already knew about the Predot. My question is about NANP:Predot... :)
 *Emanuel Damasceno*





 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:38 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
 datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Predot means that the digits before "dot" will be stripped.
>
>   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Emanuel Damasceno <
> aedamasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hello Experts,
>>
>> As I practice more and more for my CCIE exam, I came across DDI
>> NANP:Predot. I have no experience whatsoever with the North American
>> Numbering Plan. All my projects were non-NANP Dial plans, so here is my
>> question: I know the ":" represents a prepend, but when the DDI is
>> NANP:Predot, what does that really mean?
>>
>> Thanks for the hints
>> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>
>
>

>>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity VM Box Creation

[datucha123 datucha123]

Yes, I have that user "admin" (Just in my case it is called
"CCMAdministrator"), and this user is also configured in CUC Phone System.
But still no success :(

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Chris Martin  wrote:

> Been a while since I tested pushing unity users through CUCM, but I
> thought you had to set the application user to an axl enabled user that is
> also set in unity connection phone system.  IE: admin.
>
> I may be wrong.. Has been a while since I tried that and I don't have
> access to my lab right now.
>
> Chris
>
>   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:20 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   I am trying to create the Voice Mail Box for the User from the CUCM
>> directly, meaning that I am going into Line configuration and then
>> selecting the "Create Voice Mail Box" from the upper right corner.
>>
>> But when I choose the User Template (it is visible in CUCM when adding
>> the VM Box) and click SAVE, it gaves me an error:"   *Unmapped Exception
>> (401)Unauthorized*"
>>
>> Thus I have changed the Name in Application Server to IP address, and
>> assigned the CUCM Administrator and CCMSysUser as the Selected Application
>> Users for CUC Server.
>>
>> Also has unset the "Voice Mail Box Mask" in the VM Profile (as the CUCM
>> 7.0 has BUG related to that).
>>
>> But still I got that error when tryin to add a VM Box from CUCM Device
>> Line configuration.
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC VM Mask

[datucha123 datucha123]

Yes, sure, it is enabled on the Incoming Gateway.

I have also noticed that the Voice Mail Box Mask is working only for the
CUCM Registered IP Phones. It transforms the Redirecting and Calling Number
as necessary. But when the IP Phone, that is not registered with CUCM
(CUCME IP Phones) is redirecting the call to CUC, that Transformation does
not work :(

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Chris Martin  wrote:

> At a glance your config seems fine and it should work as you intend.  I
> assume you also allowed incoming redirecting number for the CUCM gateway?
>
> Chris
>
>   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:38 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   Hello,
>>
>> I have configured the Voice Mail Box Mask for  (As I know, this will
>> transform the Redricting Number to last 4 digits).
>>
>> but somehow it does not work :(
>>
>> So here what is happening:
>>
>> I have configure the User and VM Box in CUC for CUCME IP Phone, (ext
>> 3012). I have configure the Call Forward All on CUCME IP Phone to CUC VM
>> Pilot through the PSTN (0001911444888)
>>
>> Also configured the Voice Mail Box Mask for VM Porfile to .
>>
>> CUCME IP Phone has also the DialPlan pattern assigned, so that the Caller
>> ID is 2553012.
>>
>> CUCME IP Phone is calling CUC through the PRI PSTN. (I enabled the
>> Redirecting IE on PR interfaces).
>>
>> Also I have enabled the "call-forward system redirect" in
>> Telephony-service, so that the redirecting number will be expanded based on
>> the DialPlan pattern.
>>
>> So now when the some Phone calls this CUCME IP Phones (That has CFWDALL
>> to CUC PILOT NUMBER Through PSTN) the caller hears the AA Greeting instead
>> of Voice Mail leaving greeting.
>>
>> So as I guess the Voice Mail Box Mask transformation is not working.
>>
>> Maybe I am missing something?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Plus Dialing

[datucha123 datucha123]

Hello,

How can I force CUCME IP Phones to display the Numbers in Missed/Received
calls directory with + sign?

When the call comes to CUCME with Caller ID with +, the CUCME IP Phone
dislpays that + sign in lower place of the screen. But in the Directories
(Missed/Received) calls, that number is listed without +.

So how can I configure the CUCME not to strip the + sign from the Calling
Number, and also display that sign in Directories (Missed/Received) calls?

On CUCM, I do not have a problem, the + sign is listed in the
Missed/Received calls, but as for CUCME I cannot make it working.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity VM Box Creation

[Chris Martin]

Been a while since I tested pushing unity users through CUCM, but I thought
you had to set the application user to an axl enabled user that is also set
in unity connection phone system.  IE: admin.

I may be wrong.. Has been a while since I tried that and I don't have
access to my lab right now.

Chris

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:20 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am trying to create the Voice Mail Box for the User from the CUCM
> directly, meaning that I am going into Line configuration and then
> selecting the "Create Voice Mail Box" from the upper right corner.
>
> But when I choose the User Template (it is visible in CUCM when adding the
> VM Box) and click SAVE, it gaves me an error:"*Unmapped Exception
> (401)Unauthorized*"
>
> Thus I have changed the Name in Application Server to IP address, and
> assigned the CUCM Administrator and CCMSysUser as the Selected Application
> Users for CUC Server.
>
> Also has unset the "Voice Mail Box Mask" in the VM Profile (as the CUCM
> 7.0 has BUG related to that).
>
> But still I got that error when tryin to add a VM Box from CUCM Device
> Line configuration.
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC VM Mask

[Chris Martin]

At a glance your config seems fine and it should work as you intend.  I
assume you also allowed incoming redirecting number for the CUCM gateway?

Chris

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:38 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have configured the Voice Mail Box Mask for  (As I know, this will
> transform the Redricting Number to last 4 digits).
>
> but somehow it does not work :(
>
> So here what is happening:
>
> I have configure the User and VM Box in CUC for CUCME IP Phone, (ext
> 3012). I have configure the Call Forward All on CUCME IP Phone to CUC VM
> Pilot through the PSTN (0001911444888)
>
> Also configured the Voice Mail Box Mask for VM Porfile to .
>
> CUCME IP Phone has also the DialPlan pattern assigned, so that the Caller
> ID is 2553012.
>
> CUCME IP Phone is calling CUC through the PRI PSTN. (I enabled the
> Redirecting IE on PR interfaces).
>
> Also I have enabled the "call-forward system redirect" in
> Telephony-service, so that the redirecting number will be expanded based on
> the DialPlan pattern.
>
> So now when the some Phone calls this CUCME IP Phones (That has CFWDALL to
> CUC PILOT NUMBER Through PSTN) the caller hears the AA Greeting instead of
> Voice Mail leaving greeting.
>
> So as I guess the Voice Mail Box Mask transformation is not working.
>
> Maybe I am missing something?
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DDI NANP:Predot

[Adam Thompson]

The reason that it says NANP:Predot is because by default the NANP
dial-plan is installed. If you were to install the AMNP dial-plan it would
say AMNP:Predot. It would then follow the rules outlined in that specific
dial plan to transform the number in the Route List. The other 'Predot' DDI
on the route pattern does not follow any specific dial-plan rules. It only
acts on the digit string that matches.

Clear as mud?

HTH
-Adam

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Emanuel Damasceno wrote:

> It's cool. I just wanted to know what it means. I know NANP stands for
> North American Numbering Plan, but why NANP:Predot? It probably has a
> difference, otherwise it wouldn't have "Predot" and "NANP:Predot", the same
> way there is "Predot Trailing-#" which means "Predot until the caller dials
> #"
>
> It must have a meaning and I wanna know :D If you guys could point me to
> any documents that explain this, I'd appreciate it.
>
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:45 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I do not know what does that mean, but do not worry.
>>
>> There will no NANP on the CCIE exam, as I know.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Emanuel Damasceno > > wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Datucha.
>>>
>>> I already knew about the Predot. My question is about NANP:Predot... :)
>>> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:38 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
>>> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Predot means that the digits before "dot" will be stripped.

   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Emanuel Damasceno <
 aedamasc...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hello Experts,
>
> As I practice more and more for my CCIE exam, I came across DDI
> NANP:Predot. I have no experience whatsoever with the North American
> Numbering Plan. All my projects were non-NANP Dial plans, so here is my
> question: I know the ":" represents a prepend, but when the DDI is
> NANP:Predot, what does that really mean?
>
> Thanks for the hints
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>


>>>
>>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DDI NANP:Predot

[datucha123 datucha123]

Use the Callmanager Help pages for more details on each Type for "discard
digits"

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Emanuel Damasceno
wrote:

> It's cool. I just wanted to know what it means. I know NANP stands for
> North American Numbering Plan, but why NANP:Predot? It probably has a
> difference, otherwise it wouldn't have "Predot" and "NANP:Predot", the same
> way there is "Predot Trailing-#" which means "Predot until the caller dials
> #"
>
> It must have a meaning and I wanna know :D If you guys could point me to
> any documents that explain this, I'd appreciate it.
>
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:45 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I do not know what does that mean, but do not worry.
>>
>> There will no NANP on the CCIE exam, as I know.
>>
>>   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Emanuel Damasceno <
>> aedamasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Datucha.
>>>
>>> I already knew about the Predot. My question is about NANP:Predot... :)
>>> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:38 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
>>> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Predot means that the digits before "dot" will be stripped.

   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Emanuel Damasceno <
 aedamasc...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hello Experts,
>
> As I practice more and more for my CCIE exam, I came across DDI
> NANP:Predot. I have no experience whatsoever with the North American
> Numbering Plan. All my projects were non-NANP Dial plans, so here is my
> question: I know the ":" represents a prepend, but when the DDI is
> NANP:Predot, what does that really mean?
>
> Thanks for the hints
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>


>>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DDI NANP:Predot

[Emanuel Damasceno]

It's cool. I just wanted to know what it means. I know NANP stands for
North American Numbering Plan, but why NANP:Predot? It probably has a
difference, otherwise it wouldn't have "Predot" and "NANP:Predot", the same
way there is "Predot Trailing-#" which means "Predot until the caller dials
#"

It must have a meaning and I wanna know :D If you guys could point me to
any documents that explain this, I'd appreciate it.

*Emanuel Damasceno*




On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:45 AM, datucha123 datucha123  wrote:

> I do not know what does that mean, but do not worry.
>
> There will no NANP on the CCIE exam, as I know.
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Emanuel Damasceno 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Datucha.
>>
>> I already knew about the Predot. My question is about NANP:Predot... :)
>> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:38 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
>> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Predot means that the digits before "dot" will be stripped.
>>>
>>>   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Emanuel Damasceno <
>>> aedamasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
  Hello Experts,

 As I practice more and more for my CCIE exam, I came across DDI
 NANP:Predot. I have no experience whatsoever with the North American
 Numbering Plan. All my projects were non-NANP Dial plans, so here is my
 question: I know the ":" represents a prepend, but when the DDI is
 NANP:Predot, what does that really mean?

 Thanks for the hints
 *Emanuel Damasceno*



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com 

>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC VM Mask

[datucha123 datucha123]

Hello,

I have configured the Voice Mail Box Mask for  (As I know, this will
transform the Redricting Number to last 4 digits).

but somehow it does not work :(

So here what is happening:

I have configure the User and VM Box in CUC for CUCME IP Phone, (ext 3012).
I have configure the Call Forward All on CUCME IP Phone to CUC VM Pilot
through the PSTN (0001911444888)

Also configured the Voice Mail Box Mask for VM Porfile to .

CUCME IP Phone has also the DialPlan pattern assigned, so that the Caller
ID is 2553012.

CUCME IP Phone is calling CUC through the PRI PSTN. (I enabled the
Redirecting IE on PR interfaces).

Also I have enabled the "call-forward system redirect" in
Telephony-service, so that the redirecting number will be expanded based on
the DialPlan pattern.

So now when the some Phone calls this CUCME IP Phones (That has CFWDALL to
CUC PILOT NUMBER Through PSTN) the caller hears the AA Greeting instead of
Voice Mail leaving greeting.

So as I guess the Voice Mail Box Mask transformation is not working.

Maybe I am missing something?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity VM Box Creation

[datucha123 datucha123]

I am trying to create the Voice Mail Box for the User from the CUCM
directly, meaning that I am going into Line configuration and then
selecting the "Create Voice Mail Box" from the upper right corner.

But when I choose the User Template (it is visible in CUCM when adding the
VM Box) and click SAVE, it gaves me an error:"*Unmapped Exception
(401)Unauthorized*"

Thus I have changed the Name in Application Server to IP address, and
assigned the CUCM Administrator and CCMSysUser as the Selected Application
Users for CUC Server.

Also has unset the "Voice Mail Box Mask" in the VM Profile (as the CUCM 7.0
has BUG related to that).

But still I got that error when tryin to add a VM Box from CUCM Device Line
configuration.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Alerting Name

[datucha123 datucha123]

Great info, thank you so much.

And how to enable the same function through MGCP Gateway?

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Mohammed Al Baqari <
baqari.voic...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Enable this command At both PRI gateways and you search what it’s doing J
> 
>
> ** **
>
> “voice service voip
>
> qsig decode”
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohammed Al Baqari
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 23, 2011 2:19 PM
> *To:* Abel ...
> *Cc:* Mohd Baqari; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Alerting Name
>
> ** **
>
> Yes, it is passing the Display IE from CUCM to CUCME and in inverse
> direction. 
>
>  
>
> The Calling Name Display is fine. 
>
>  
>
> But I need to activate the Alerting Name to be visible on the Calling IP
> Phone of the Called IP Phone through PRI.
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Abel ...  wrote:
>
> Your PSTN router have the commands to send the display-ie on the serial
> interface for the D channel? 
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:37 PM, datucha123 datucha123 <
> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I jave enabled the Dislpay IE on PRI and in CUCM. 
>
>  
>
> But that is for Calling ID display. 
>
>  
>
> And I am trying to get the Alerting ID Display. 
>
>  
>
> Calling ID Display  -  Who is Calling  (This I can do without a problem)**
> **
>
> Alerting ID Display - Who are we calling to  ( this I cannot do).
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Mohd Baqari 
> wrote:
>
> You need to enable display-ie on your pri links and in cucm.
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohammed Al Baqari
>
> ** **
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 2:34 PM, datucha123 datucha123 
> wrote:
>
>   
>
> Hello,
>
>  
>
> Is it possible in PRI ISDN to get the Alerting Name, in the LAB
> environment?
>
>  
>
> I mean, when the CUCM IP Phone calls CUCME IP Phone through the PRI, the
> CUCM IP Phone will display the Alerting Name and Number of the CUCME IP
> Phone? Just like the SIP and H323 trunks do when the CUCM is connected to
> CUCME dirrecly.
>
>  
>
> And when the CUCME IP Phone calls the CUCM IP Phone through the PRI, the
> Alerting Name and Number to be displayed on the Calling CUCME IP Phone?***
> *
>
>  
>
> I DO NOT MEAN THE CALLING PARTY NAME AND NUMBER.
>
>  
>
> I MEAN THE ALERTING NAME AND NUMBER THROUGH THE PRI.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
> ** **
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Alerting Name

[Mohammed Al Baqari]

Enable this command At both PRI gateways and you search what it's doing J

 

"voice service voip

qsig decode"

 

Regards,

Mohammed Al Baqari

 

From: datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 2:19 PM
To: Abel ...
Cc: Mohd Baqari; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Alerting Name

 

Yes, it is passing the Display IE from CUCM to CUCME and in inverse
direction. 

 

The Calling Name Display is fine. 

 

But I need to activate the Alerting Name to be visible on the Calling IP
Phone of the Called IP Phone through PRI.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Abel ...  wrote:

Your PSTN router have the commands to send the display-ie on the serial
interface for the D channel? 

 

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:37 PM, datucha123 datucha123
 wrote:

I jave enabled the Dislpay IE on PRI and in CUCM. 

 

But that is for Calling ID display. 

 

And I am trying to get the Alerting ID Display. 

 

Calling ID Display  -  Who is Calling  (This I can do without a problem)

Alerting ID Display - Who are we calling to  ( this I cannot do).

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Mohd Baqari 
wrote:

You need to enable display-ie on your pri links and in cucm.

 

Regards,

Mohammed Al Baqari

 

Sent from my iPhone


On Nov 22, 2011, at 2:34 PM, datucha123 datucha123 
wrote:

 

Hello,

 

Is it possible in PRI ISDN to get the Alerting Name, in the LAB environment?

 

I mean, when the CUCM IP Phone calls CUCME IP Phone through the PRI, the
CUCM IP Phone will display the Alerting Name and Number of the CUCME IP
Phone? Just like the SIP and H323 trunks do when the CUCM is connected to
CUCME dirrecly.

 

And when the CUCME IP Phone calls the CUCM IP Phone through the PRI, the
Alerting Name and Number to be displayed on the Calling CUCME IP Phone?

 

I DO NOT MEAN THE CALLING PARTY NAME AND NUMBER.

 

I MEAN THE ALERTING NAME AND NUMBER THROUGH THE PRI.

 

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com  

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com  

 


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com  

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com  

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DDI NANP:Predot

[datucha123 datucha123]

I do not know what does that mean, but do not worry.

There will no NANP on the CCIE exam, as I know.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Emanuel Damasceno wrote:

> Thanks Datucha.
>
> I already knew about the Predot. My question is about NANP:Predot... :)
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:38 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <
> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Predot means that the digits before "dot" will be stripped.
>>
>>   On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Emanuel Damasceno <
>> aedamasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hello Experts,
>>>
>>> As I practice more and more for my CCIE exam, I came across DDI
>>> NANP:Predot. I have no experience whatsoever with the North American
>>> Numbering Plan. All my projects were non-NANP Dial plans, so here is my
>>> question: I know the ":" represents a prepend, but when the DDI is
>>> NANP:Predot, what does that really mean?
>>>
>>> Thanks for the hints
>>> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>>
>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Priority for Gatekeeper

[Mohammed Al Baqari]

It should be. You said that you don't need zone prefixes but you need to
assign priorities.

 

In this case, use a dot wildcard to match any digit (in other words zone
prefix will be a don't care) and change the priorities.

 

Regards,

Mohammed Al Baqari

 

From: datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 2:21 PM
To: Mohd Baqari
Cc: Ashraf Ayyash; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Priority for Gatekeeper

 

That is a good idea? 

 

I have to use the single "dot" for wildcard as a Prefix?

 

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Mohd Baqari 
wrote:

Why not to create a multiple zone prefixs to match '.' wildcard and assign
priorities.

In this case you aren't really using zone prefixes instead only the priority
option.

Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari

Sent from my iPhone


On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:04 PM, Ashraf Ayyash  wrote:

> You cannot,
>
> You are relaying on the Tech prefix in this case to diff between the 2
> endpoint so in order to prioritize  2 endpoints registered to the GK
> With the same Tech prefix and in the same zone you have to use the gw
> priority command ,
>
> In regard of the DP idea , the CCM's will get register with the GK
> with priority = 5 for all of them and the GK will load balance between
> them ,
>
> Finally , the GK never register to anyone but the Directory GK .
>
>
> Ash
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:18 AM, datucha123 datucha123
>  wrote:
>> Ok, but I am registering CUCM with GK, and not vise versa. So the GK has
to
>> know the order of CUCMs.
>>
>> I think that the DP will not tell the GK, which CUCMs to use as a Primary
>> one.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Luis Felipe Segnini Salas
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> You will need to create a new Device Pool for the Gatekeeper controlled
>>> trunk configured on CUCM. This new Device Pool should contain a
CallManager
>>> group with the correct order of the Callmanagers.
>>>
>>> So, with this you should be able to prioritize the CUCM Trunk in the GK.
>>>
>>> HTH
>>>
>>> Felipe Segnini
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:37:36 +0400
>>> From: datucha...@gmail.com
>>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Priority for Gatekeeper
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> When the CUCM Cluster registers with GK, two endpoints are created in GK
-
>>> one for Publisher and another for Subscriber.
>>>
>>> And to prioritize those CUCMs in GK, we have to use the "zone prefix xxx
>>> gw-priority" command with appropriate values.
>>>
>>> But how to prioritize CUCM Trunk in GK, when I am not using the Zone
>>> Prefix at all? (for instance CUCM and CUCME are in the same Zone
registeres,
>>> so I do not need the Zone prefixes, but still need to prioritize the
CUCM
>>> Servers in GK?)
>>>
>>>
>>> ___ For more information
>>> regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com  
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com  
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com  
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com  
>>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com  
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com  

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DDI NANP:Predot

[Emanuel Damasceno]

Thanks Datucha.

I already knew about the Predot. My question is about NANP:Predot... :)
*Emanuel Damasceno*




On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:38 AM, datucha123 datucha123  wrote:

> Predot means that the digits before "dot" will be stripped.
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Emanuel Damasceno 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> As I practice more and more for my CCIE exam, I came across DDI
>> NANP:Predot. I have no experience whatsoever with the North American
>> Numbering Plan. All my projects were non-NANP Dial plans, so here is my
>> question: I know the ":" represents a prepend, but when the DDI is
>> NANP:Predot, what does that really mean?
>>
>> Thanks for the hints
>> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DDI NANP:Predot

[datucha123 datucha123]

Predot means that the digits before "dot" will be stripped.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Emanuel Damasceno wrote:

> Hello Experts,
>
> As I practice more and more for my CCIE exam, I came across DDI
> NANP:Predot. I have no experience whatsoever with the North American
> Numbering Plan. All my projects were non-NANP Dial plans, so here is my
> question: I know the ":" represents a prepend, but when the DDI is
> NANP:Predot, what does that really mean?
>
> Thanks for the hints
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Priority for Gatekeeper

[datucha123 datucha123]

That is a good idea?

I have to use the single "dot" for wildcard as a Prefix?


On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Mohd Baqari wrote:

> Why not to create a multiple zone prefixs to match '.' wildcard and assign
> priorities.
>
> In this case you aren't really using zone prefixes instead only the
> priority option.
>
> Regards,
> Mohammed Al Baqari
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:04 PM, Ashraf Ayyash  wrote:
>
> > You cannot,
> >
> > You are relaying on the Tech prefix in this case to diff between the 2
> > endpoint so in order to prioritize  2 endpoints registered to the GK
> > With the same Tech prefix and in the same zone you have to use the gw
> > priority command ,
> >
> > In regard of the DP idea , the CCM's will get register with the GK
> > with priority = 5 for all of them and the GK will load balance between
> > them ,
> >
> > Finally , the GK never register to anyone but the Directory GK .
> >
> >
> > Ash
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:18 AM, datucha123 datucha123
> >  wrote:
> >> Ok, but I am registering CUCM with GK, and not vise versa. So the GK
> has to
> >> know the order of CUCMs.
> >>
> >> I think that the DP will not tell the GK, which CUCMs to use as a
> Primary
> >> one.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Luis Felipe Segnini Salas
> >>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> You will need to create a new Device Pool for the Gatekeeper controlled
> >>> trunk configured on CUCM. This new Device Pool should contain a
> CallManager
> >>> group with the correct order of the Callmanagers.
> >>>
> >>> So, with this you should be able to prioritize the CUCM Trunk in the
> GK.
> >>>
> >>> HTH
> >>>
> >>> Felipe Segnini
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:37:36 +0400
> >>> From: datucha...@gmail.com
> >>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Priority for Gatekeeper
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> When the CUCM Cluster registers with GK, two endpoints are created in
> GK -
> >>> one for Publisher and another for Subscriber.
> >>>
> >>> And to prioritize those CUCMs in GK, we have to use the "zone prefix
> xxx
> >>> gw-priority" command with appropriate values.
> >>>
> >>> But how to prioritize CUCM Trunk in GK, when I am not using the Zone
> >>> Prefix at all? (for instance CUCM and CUCME are in the same Zone
> registeres,
> >>> so I do not need the Zone prefixes, but still need to prioritize the
> CUCM
> >>> Servers in GK?)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ___ For more information
> >>> regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
> www.ipexpert.com
> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
> >>
> >> ___
> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> >> visit www.ipexpert.com
> >>
> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
> >>
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Alerting Name

[datucha123 datucha123]

Yes, it is passing the Display IE from CUCM to CUCME and in inverse
direction.

The Calling Name Display is fine.

But I need to activate the Alerting Name to be visible on the Calling IP
Phone of the Called IP Phone through PRI.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Abel ...  wrote:

> Your PSTN router have the commands to send the display-ie on the serial
> interface for the D channel?
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:37 PM, datucha123 datucha123 <
> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I jave enabled the Dislpay IE on PRI and in CUCM.
>>
>> But that is for Calling ID display.
>>
>> And I am trying to get the Alerting ID Display.
>>
>> Calling ID Display  -  Who is Calling  (This I can do without a problem)
>> Alerting ID Display - Who are we calling to  ( this I cannot do).
>>
>>  On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Mohd Baqari 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  You need to enable display-ie on your pri links and in cucm.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mohammed Al Baqari
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Nov 22, 2011, at 2:34 PM, datucha123 datucha123 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Is it possible in PRI ISDN to get the Alerting Name, in the LAB
>>> environment?
>>>
>>> I mean, when the CUCM IP Phone calls CUCME IP Phone through the PRI, the
>>> CUCM IP Phone will display the Alerting Name and Number of the CUCME IP
>>> Phone? Just like the SIP and H323 trunks do when the CUCM is connected to
>>> CUCME dirrecly.
>>>
>>> And when the CUCME IP Phone calls the CUCM IP Phone through the PRI, the
>>> Alerting Name and Number to be displayed on the Calling CUCME IP Phone?
>>>
>>> I DO NOT MEAN THE CALLING PARTY NAME AND NUMBER.
>>>
>>> I MEAN THE ALERTING NAME AND NUMBER THROUGH THE PRI.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com