Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Publisher failure
am afraid you will need to do disaster recovery on pub (rebuild and import backup) , then replicate it's DB to the sub afterwards. 2012/1/19 khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com Hi, What can we do in case of the Publisher failed to boot and the Subscriber is still working but I can't do any configuration on it? The Publisher vm crashed and I could not recover it. Is there a way to restore the db from the sub to the pub or the replication will fix that? Thanks for your inputs. Regards. Khaled ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail during AAR Redux
would 'call-forward busy 570.' work under fallback config? This needs also that the 570X range is part of the HQ's DID range. If this is the case, this inbound call on HQ can be matched on a CTI RP witf CFA to VM and with a VM mask set. from the top of my head I do not see how to manipulate the RDNIS so it dynamically reflects the forwarding station at the branch. If it only needs to work for 1 specific forwarding number, then you can manipulate it statically I guess 2012/1/19 Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com Hello, this issue has surfaced in the past but no one email seems to summarize the exact requirements to get Voicemail to work during AAR. I'd like to give a go and get your feedback: Task: BR1, a H.323 GW, is in AAR, Voicemail must work 1. BR1 Ph2 dials Voicemail external PSTN DID directly: Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002 Solution: Configure 415888100N as alternate extension for all BR1 lines 100N 2. BR1 Ph2 presses messages service button or dials 5600 (the VM pilot) Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002, RDNIS 5600 Solution: This is the task that seems to cause the most confusion, you hit the Unity Connection Opening Greeting rather than the users Attempt Sign-In; this is due to the RDNIS 5600 which isn't a mailbox on the system. Unlike some reports which stated that the 10D CallerID as alternate extension worked for them. I found that the RDNIS matching wins, it is a non-mailbox extension, so I always get Unity Connection Opening Greeting. Can you guys confirm that this is the expected behaviour for RDNIS = 5600 (VM pilot) and CallerID = 4158881002 (1002 alternate extension). My solution is to add a Fowarded Routing Rule with Forwarding Station = 5600 and Send Call To = Attempt Sign-In I have only read one report that suggested this and I find I need this; yet nobody else seemed to need this. Hence I really like to hear your thoughts: is the Forwarded Routing Rule mandatory? 3. PSTN, Internal users call BR1 Ph2 Note: HQ-RTR sees CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 123456789, RDNIS 1002 Solution: this task works with no further configuration because the RDNIS is already correct. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Publisher failure
Hi Khaled, you are right, you cannot do administration while your publisher is down. Replication goes from publisher server to subscriber servers, not the other way around. Do you have a backup done via OS administration web page? Have you save your vm onto an external drive or in your datastore? Unfortunately, if you haven't, I guess you will have to rebuilt a new publisher... Regards, Julien 2012/1/19 khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com Hi, What can we do in case of the Publisher failed to boot and the Subscriber is still working but I can't do any configuration on it? The Publisher vm crashed and I could not recover it. Is there a way to restore the db from the sub to the pub or the replication will fix that? Thanks for your inputs. Regards. Khaled ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco DirSync Service
Hi Ken, If you are using an AD to provision users, then you need this service to be enabled. if you are not using AD to provision users, I guess you will import users via AXL. Therefore, you don't need this service. Regards, Julien 2012/1/19 Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Hi, Can we disable Cisco DirSync Service from CUCM Publisher , CUCM Subscriber Unity Connection Servers if we don't use an external directory authentication ? Does this service contribute to user import from CUCM to CUC or UCCX / CUPS integrations ? Tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail during AAR Redux
Hi Anthony, Case 1 if correct. That is the best way to configure it. In case 2, you should not need to configure that forwarding rule at all. As a matter of fact, I believe the call should not have RDNIS at all, it's a direct call so should only have DNIS/ANI. If I remember correctly at least. I'm pretty sure it's like that. What's the AAR configuration that you have, especially on VM Ports and BR1 Phones? As well make sure there is no DN 5600 floating around without being assigned to any device. Can you paste the q931 message from BR1 GW and coming into HQ gateway too? Cheers, On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, this issue has surfaced in the past but no one email seems to summarize the exact requirements to get Voicemail to work during AAR. I'd like to give a go and get your feedback: Task: BR1, a H.323 GW, is in AAR, Voicemail must work 1. BR1 Ph2 dials Voicemail external PSTN DID directly: Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002 Solution: Configure 415888100N as alternate extension for all BR1 lines 100N 2. BR1 Ph2 presses messages service button or dials 5600 (the VM pilot) Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002, RDNIS 5600 Solution: This is the task that seems to cause the most confusion, you hit the Unity Connection Opening Greeting rather than the users Attempt Sign-In; this is due to the RDNIS 5600 which isn't a mailbox on the system. Unlike some reports which stated that the 10D CallerID as alternate extension worked for them. I found that the RDNIS matching wins, it is a non-mailbox extension, so I always get Unity Connection Opening Greeting. Can you guys confirm that this is the expected behaviour for RDNIS = 5600 (VM pilot) and CallerID = 4158881002 (1002 alternate extension). My solution is to add a Fowarded Routing Rule with Forwarding Station = 5600 and Send Call To = Attempt Sign-In I have only read one report that suggested this and I find I need this; yet nobody else seemed to need this. Hence I really like to hear your thoughts: is the Forwarded Routing Rule mandatory? 3. PSTN, Internal users call BR1 Ph2 Note: HQ-RTR sees CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 123456789, RDNIS 1002 Solution: this task works with no further configuration because the RDNIS is already correct. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Publisher failure
Bad news. I hope you have backups from Disaster Recovery System... Otherwise I hope it's not production environment, just a lab, because you'll have to rebuild. Cheers, 2012/1/19 khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com Hi, What can we do in case of the Publisher failed to boot and the Subscriber is still working but I can't do any configuration on it? The Publisher vm crashed and I could not recover it. Is there a way to restore the db from the sub to the pub or the replication will fix that? Thanks for your inputs. Regards. Khaled ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail during AAR Redux
Juan, We are discussing AAR not fallback mode... that's completely different. On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.comwrote: would 'call-forward busy 570.' work under fallback config? This needs also that the 570X range is part of the HQ's DID range. If this is the case, this inbound call on HQ can be matched on a CTI RP witf CFA to VM and with a VM mask set. from the top of my head I do not see how to manipulate the RDNIS so it dynamically reflects the forwarding station at the branch. If it only needs to work for 1 specific forwarding number, then you can manipulate it statically I guess 2012/1/19 Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com Hello, this issue has surfaced in the past but no one email seems to summarize the exact requirements to get Voicemail to work during AAR. I'd like to give a go and get your feedback: Task: BR1, a H.323 GW, is in AAR, Voicemail must work 1. BR1 Ph2 dials Voicemail external PSTN DID directly: Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002 Solution: Configure 415888100N as alternate extension for all BR1 lines 100N 2. BR1 Ph2 presses messages service button or dials 5600 (the VM pilot) Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002, RDNIS 5600 Solution: This is the task that seems to cause the most confusion, you hit the Unity Connection Opening Greeting rather than the users Attempt Sign-In; this is due to the RDNIS 5600 which isn't a mailbox on the system. Unlike some reports which stated that the 10D CallerID as alternate extension worked for them. I found that the RDNIS matching wins, it is a non-mailbox extension, so I always get Unity Connection Opening Greeting. Can you guys confirm that this is the expected behaviour for RDNIS = 5600 (VM pilot) and CallerID = 4158881002 (1002 alternate extension). My solution is to add a Fowarded Routing Rule with Forwarding Station = 5600 and Send Call To = Attempt Sign-In I have only read one report that suggested this and I find I need this; yet nobody else seemed to need this. Hence I really like to hear your thoughts: is the Forwarded Routing Rule mandatory? 3. PSTN, Internal users call BR1 Ph2 Note: HQ-RTR sees CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 123456789, RDNIS 1002 Solution: this task works with no further configuration because the RDNIS is already correct. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Publisher failure
Thanks all to your replies. It's in a lab environment but I am asking myself this question all the time. What happened if something bad happened to the publisher? I got the answer. I should depend on backups. In this case subscriber role is just helping doing part of the job of the publisher and when PUB is down , he can act fully as the call manager but with no modifications. If hardware failure or anything bad happened to the PUB, I have to rebuild the PUB , do the backup recovery and then rebuild the SUB again! (Correct?) If I have one SUB , that will be one job but If I have many SUB's ,that's alot to do? Is that correct? Another question regarding the backup, can the import/export (Bulk Administration menu) do the job? Regards. Khaled From: gogli...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:31:02 +0100 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Publisher failure To: khaled_sah...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Bad news. I hope you have backups from Disaster Recovery System... Otherwise I hope it's not production environment, just a lab, because you'll have to rebuild. Cheers, 2012/1/19 khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com Hi, What can we do in case of the Publisher failed to boot and the Subscriber is still working but I can't do any configuration on it? The Publisher vm crashed and I could not recover it. Is there a way to restore the db from the sub to the pub or the replication will fix that? Thanks for your inputs. Regards. Khaled ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail during AAR Redux
my mistake - I didn't read the question well - apologies 2012/1/19 George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com Juan, We are discussing AAR not fallback mode... that's completely different. On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.com wrote: would 'call-forward busy 570.' work under fallback config? This needs also that the 570X range is part of the HQ's DID range. If this is the case, this inbound call on HQ can be matched on a CTI RP witf CFA to VM and with a VM mask set. from the top of my head I do not see how to manipulate the RDNIS so it dynamically reflects the forwarding station at the branch. If it only needs to work for 1 specific forwarding number, then you can manipulate it statically I guess 2012/1/19 Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com Hello, this issue has surfaced in the past but no one email seems to summarize the exact requirements to get Voicemail to work during AAR. I'd like to give a go and get your feedback: Task: BR1, a H.323 GW, is in AAR, Voicemail must work 1. BR1 Ph2 dials Voicemail external PSTN DID directly: Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002 Solution: Configure 415888100N as alternate extension for all BR1 lines 100N 2. BR1 Ph2 presses messages service button or dials 5600 (the VM pilot) Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002, RDNIS 5600 Solution: This is the task that seems to cause the most confusion, you hit the Unity Connection Opening Greeting rather than the users Attempt Sign-In; this is due to the RDNIS 5600 which isn't a mailbox on the system. Unlike some reports which stated that the 10D CallerID as alternate extension worked for them. I found that the RDNIS matching wins, it is a non-mailbox extension, so I always get Unity Connection Opening Greeting. Can you guys confirm that this is the expected behaviour for RDNIS = 5600 (VM pilot) and CallerID = 4158881002 (1002 alternate extension). My solution is to add a Fowarded Routing Rule with Forwarding Station = 5600 and Send Call To = Attempt Sign-In I have only read one report that suggested this and I find I need this; yet nobody else seemed to need this. Hence I really like to hear your thoughts: is the Forwarded Routing Rule mandatory? 3. PSTN, Internal users call BR1 Ph2 Note: HQ-RTR sees CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 123456789, RDNIS 1002 Solution: this task works with no further configuration because the RDNIS is already correct. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail during AAR Redux
Yes, the RDNIS of 5600 looks bad. When I dial a normal DN (1002 to 5002) I get CalledID 14087775002 and CallerID 4158881002 with no RDNIS. My Hunt Pilot is configured in AAR-GLOBAL with mask +14087775600. There is no 5600 DN around. The VM Pilot looks normal: Branch1# ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x2 0x1, Calling num 4158881002 ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Sending SETUP callref = 0x00F7 callID = 0x8089 switch = primary-ni interface = User ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x00F7 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98383 Exclusive, Channel 3 Display i = 'Thomas Jefferson' Calling Party Number Branch1# i = 0x2181, '4158881002' Plan:ISDN, Type:National Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '14087775600' Plan:ISDN, Type:National Redirecting Number i = 0x81, '5600' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x80F7 Channel ID i = 0xA98383 Exclusive, Channel 3 ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x80F7 Progress Ind i = 0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now available ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x80F7 Display i = 'UC7' %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface Serial0/0/0:2 is now connected to 14087775600 N/A %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface Serial0/0/0:2 is now connected to 14087775600 N/A Branch1# ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x00F7 Branch1# %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface Serial0/0/0:2 disconnected from 14087775600 , call lasted 2 seconds Branch1# ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x00F7 Cause i = 0x8090 - Normal call clearing ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x80F7 ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x00F7 On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:26 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anthony, Case 1 if correct. That is the best way to configure it. In case 2, you should not need to configure that forwarding rule at all. As a matter of fact, I believe the call should not have RDNIS at all, it's a direct call so should only have DNIS/ANI. If I remember correctly at least. I'm pretty sure it's like that. What's the AAR configuration that you have, especially on VM Ports and BR1 Phones? As well make sure there is no DN 5600 floating around without being assigned to any device. Can you paste the q931 message from BR1 GW and coming into HQ gateway too? Cheers, On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, this issue has surfaced in the past but no one email seems to summarize the exact requirements to get Voicemail to work during AAR. I'd like to give a go and get your feedback: Task: BR1, a H.323 GW, is in AAR, Voicemail must work 1. BR1 Ph2 dials Voicemail external PSTN DID directly: Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002 Solution: Configure 415888100N as alternate extension for all BR1 lines 100N 2. BR1 Ph2 presses messages service button or dials 5600 (the VM pilot) Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002, RDNIS 5600 Solution: This is the task that seems to cause the most confusion, you hit the Unity Connection Opening Greeting rather than the users Attempt Sign-In; this is due to the RDNIS 5600 which isn't a mailbox on the system. Unlike some reports which stated that the 10D CallerID as alternate extension worked for them. I found that the RDNIS matching wins, it is a non-mailbox extension, so I always get Unity Connection Opening Greeting. Can you guys confirm that this is the expected behaviour for RDNIS = 5600 (VM pilot) and CallerID = 4158881002 (1002 alternate extension). My solution is to add a Fowarded Routing Rule with Forwarding Station = 5600 and Send Call To = Attempt Sign-In I have only read one report that suggested this and I find I need this; yet nobody else seemed to need this. Hence I really like to hear your thoughts: is the Forwarded Routing Rule mandatory? 3. PSTN, Internal users call BR1 Ph2 Note: HQ-RTR sees CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 123456789, RDNIS 1002 Solution: this task works with no further configuration because the RDNIS is already correct. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail during AAR Redux
Hi Anthony, Before anything else, can you send me the route plan report from your CUCM? If it's very big, filter by everything that starts by 5... Cheers, On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.comwrote: Yes, the RDNIS of 5600 looks bad. When I dial a normal DN (1002 to 5002) I get CalledID 14087775002 and CallerID 4158881002 with no RDNIS. My Hunt Pilot is configured in AAR-GLOBAL with mask +14087775600. There is no 5600 DN around. The VM Pilot looks normal: Branch1# ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x2 0x1, Calling num 4158881002 ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Sending SETUP callref = 0x00F7 callID = 0x8089 switch = primary-ni interface = User ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x00F7 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98383 Exclusive, Channel 3 Display i = 'Thomas Jefferson' Calling Party Number Branch1# i = 0x2181, '4158881002' Plan:ISDN, Type:National Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '14087775600' Plan:ISDN, Type:National Redirecting Number i = 0x81, '5600' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x80F7 Channel ID i = 0xA98383 Exclusive, Channel 3 ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x80F7 Progress Ind i = 0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now available ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x80F7 Display i = 'UC7' %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface Serial0/0/0:2 is now connected to 14087775600N/A %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface Serial0/0/0:2 is now connected to 14087775600N/A Branch1# ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x00F7 Branch1# %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface Serial0/0/0:2 disconnected from 14087775600, call lasted 2 seconds Branch1# ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x00F7 Cause i = 0x8090 - Normal call clearing ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x80F7 ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x00F7 On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:26 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Anthony, Case 1 if correct. That is the best way to configure it. In case 2, you should not need to configure that forwarding rule at all. As a matter of fact, I believe the call should not have RDNIS at all, it's a direct call so should only have DNIS/ANI. If I remember correctly at least. I'm pretty sure it's like that. What's the AAR configuration that you have, especially on VM Ports and BR1 Phones? As well make sure there is no DN 5600 floating around without being assigned to any device. Can you paste the q931 message from BR1 GW and coming into HQ gateway too? Cheers, On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, this issue has surfaced in the past but no one email seems to summarize the exact requirements to get Voicemail to work during AAR. I'd like to give a go and get your feedback: Task: BR1, a H.323 GW, is in AAR, Voicemail must work 1. BR1 Ph2 dials Voicemail external PSTN DID directly: Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002 Solution: Configure 415888100N as alternate extension for all BR1 lines 100N 2. BR1 Ph2 presses messages service button or dials 5600 (the VM pilot) Note: HQ-RTR sees: CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 4158881002, RDNIS 5600 Solution: This is the task that seems to cause the most confusion, you hit the Unity Connection Opening Greeting rather than the users Attempt Sign-In; this is due to the RDNIS 5600 which isn't a mailbox on the system. Unlike some reports which stated that the 10D CallerID as alternate extension worked for them. I found that the RDNIS matching wins, it is a non-mailbox extension, so I always get Unity Connection Opening Greeting. Can you guys confirm that this is the expected behaviour for RDNIS = 5600 (VM pilot) and CallerID = 4158881002 (1002 alternate extension). My solution is to add a Fowarded Routing Rule with Forwarding Station = 5600 and Send Call To = Attempt Sign-In I have only read one report that suggested this and I find I need this; yet nobody else seemed to need this. Hence I really like to hear your thoughts: is the Forwarded Routing Rule mandatory? 3. PSTN, Internal users call BR1 Ph2 Note: HQ-RTR sees CalledID 4087775600, CallerID 123456789, RDNIS 1002 Solution: this task works with no further configuration because the RDNIS is already correct. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST problem: Phones in srst mode have a different configuration than they were registered to CUCM
try to reload the Router. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:36 PM, The Masterplan winmasterp...@gmail.comwrote: The same thing. The only difference is that now I don't see anymore the phone in show run. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.comwrote: Ok ... Try changing the provision mode to none ... Delete ephone-dn 1 and ephone 3 Then do your testing. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Jan 18, 2012, at 1:12 PM, The Masterplan winmasterp...@gmail.com wrote: The phone does not appear in the output of the command: tftp-server flash:gui/ephone_admin.html max-ephones 14 ephone-dn 11 dual-line number 1002 no-reg primary description Cisco IP Communicator name Cisco IP Communicator ephone-dn 12 dual-line number 1005 no-reg primary description IP Blue name IP Blue night-service bell ephone 1 description Cisco IP Communicator mac-address F0DE.F173.03E2 type CIPC button 1:11 ephone 2 description IP Blue mac-address 0050.56C0.0008 type CIPC button 1:12 After I switch to srst, the output of the command looks like this: tftp-server flash:gui/ephone_admin.html max-ephones 14 ephone-dn 1 dual-line number description 7945 hardware name 7945 hardware ephone-dn 11 dual-line number 1002 no-reg primary description Cisco IP Communicator name Cisco IP Communicator ephone-dn 12 dual-line number 1005 no-reg primary description IP Blue name IP Blue night-service bell ephone 1 description Cisco IP Communicator mac-address F0DE.F173.03E2 type CIPC button 1:11 ephone 2 description IP Blue mac-address 0050.56C0.0008 type CIPC button 1:12 ephone 3 mac-address 0817.3514.5682 button 1:1 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.comwrote: Post the the output of show run | sec ephone. Probably the old config of ephone-dn is saved in running config due to provision all Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:55 AM, The Masterplan winmasterp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I already did no create cnf-files create cnf-files and reset the phone to factory defaults and nothing. I'm running srst mode auto provision all. See below the config: telephony-service srst mode auto-provision all srst dn line-mode dual em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0 max-ephones 14 max-dn 30 no-reg ip source-address 10.1.1.25 port 2000 system message SRST max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jan 18 2012 08:09:33 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Did you enter no create cnf-files create cnf-files on CME Router ? Which srst mode are you running? srst mode auto provision all | dn | none ? Better to post full telephony-service configuration here. (In SRST phone may be downloading previous xml configuration file from the router. Delete it from flash if so) On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:53 PM, The Masterplan winmasterp...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a problem regarding srst. The 2811 router than now is a srst was a acting as a cme in past in a demo lab and the 7960 phone was registered to it with extension . Now, the 7960 phone is registered in UCM with extension 5001 and the 2811 router is configured in telephony service srst mode. The problem is that although the old configuration of the router was erased, when it goes in srst fallback mode, the 7960 gets extension instead of 5001 and the command show telephony-service ephone shows the specified phone with message:This is an srst fallback phone. Thank you for your answer ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM version to study upgrade to latest 7.0.x release?
well, I do not know the very exact version of CUCM on the LAB Exam, but I think it is better to study with the one that proctollabs offer. After you will know the bugs and issues for that UCM/ On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Juan Lopez lopez.hernandez.j...@gmail.comwrote: all, I found the version on proctorlabs (7.0.1.11002-2) is giving me quite some issues with dialrules on the 7962. Is it a good thing to upgrade to the latest 7.0.x release to study, without being out of sync with the tested UCM version? Or should I simply upgrade the phone firmwares instead? what is the best way to prepare for the real exam? thx, Juan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper VIAZONE - Could not find an IPIPGW
Also as I remember, the IPIPGW tech prefix has to match the Destination Zone prefix. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Steven forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net wrote: @Boris @Leslie @Amit I got some other issues too. I skipped to check the GK-only functionality (BIG mistake). After i fixed the normal (without outvia) GK functions i revisited the CUBE issue. It turns out i accidently put the allow-connections on the Br2 instead of the HQ. Thanks for your time and help! :D Regards Steven __**_ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
