[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question on Auto Qos WAN QoS
Hi, I have noticed when I run AutoQoS on sub-interface it automatically add encapsulation CISCO on Inteface-dlci Config Prior to AutoQoS: interface Serial0/1/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF no frame-relay inverse-arp frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/1/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 102 --- Configuration After AutoQoS interface Serial0/1/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 102 CISCO - Encapsulation Cisco class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-1 auto qos voip trust Prior to auto configuration on my primary interface frame-relay encapsulation is IETF. I think encapsulation should be match after autoqos. Thanks Regards, Ramcharan Arya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question on Auto Qos WAN QoS
I've noticed this too, but don't have an explanation why. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone Original message From: Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.com Date: To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question on Auto Qos WAN QoS Hi, I have noticed when I run AutoQoS on sub-interface it automatically add encapsulation CISCO on Inteface-dlci Config Prior to AutoQoS: interface Serial0/1/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF no frame-relay inverse-arp frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/1/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 102 --- Configuration After AutoQoS interface Serial0/1/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 102 CISCO - Encapsulation Cisco class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-1 auto qos voip trust Prior to auto configuration on my primary interface frame-relay encapsulation is IETF. I think encapsulation should be match after autoqos. Thanks Regards, Ramcharan Arya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question on Auto Qos WAN QoS
I actually have not noticed this but that is probably because my config templates aren't specific the encapsulation type and so I use the default, which is CISCO. I am curious now so I'll reconfigure my lab before resetting it for a new sitting and see if I can reproduce. My understanding of the encapsulation option is that is specifies what your router will use to encapsulate the frames it sends. Cisco routers can actually decapsulate either CISCO or IETF, regardless of what they are configured to use for sending. At least that is my recollection. Would need to do some googling to confirm. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Ramcharan Arya wrote: Hi, I have noticed when I run AutoQoS on sub-interface it automatically add encapsulation CISCO on Inteface-dlci Config Prior to AutoQoS: interface Serial0/1/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF no frame-relay inverse-arp frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/1/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 102 --- Configuration After AutoQoS interface Serial0/1/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 102 CISCO - Encapsulation Cisco class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-1 auto qos voip trust Prior to auto configuration on my primary interface frame-relay encapsulation is IETF. I think encapsulation should be match after autoqos. Thanks Regards, Ramcharan Arya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 1 Lab 5a
Nathan, Did you by chance assign the gateway directly to a pattern? If a gateway is assigned directly as the route option for a pattern, it is no longer available for assignment to route group. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Jan 28, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Nathan Silvers wrote: Has anyone seen when trying to create a route group the gateways do not all appear as available devices, they appear when configuring route patterns but not under route groups. -- The biggest mistake people make in life is not trying to make a living at doing what they most enjoy. - Malcolm Forbes Nathan Silvers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 1 Lab 5a
You might have assigned gateway directly under route-pattern. If you remove gateway from route-pattern then you should be to add into route-group/route-list. Regards, Ramcharan Arya On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Nathan Silvers silver...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone seen when trying to create a route group the gateways do not all appear as available devices, they appear when configuring route patterns but not under route groups. -- The biggest mistake people make in life is not trying to make a living at doing what they most enjoy. - Malcolm Forbes Nathan Silvers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 1 Lab 5a
If you use a gateway directly in any route pattern, then it will be always unavailable to put into a route group. Usually it's always better to put your gateways into route group/route lists. Cheers, Dane Warner, CCVP Sr. Network Engineer Epoch Universal, Inc. (909)226-0755 [cid:image001.png@01CDFD69.544342E0] Confidentiality Notice: This email and the information contained within it, to include any attachment(s) is for the express use of Epoch Universal, Inc and the person(s) and entities to which it is addressed. It contains confidential and privileged information. As such it is intended solely for the person(s) and entities to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this transmittal in error and are obligated to delete this email and all of its attachments immediately. Any disclosure, re-creation or distribution of this transmittal or its contents is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately of your receipt of this transmittal. Please accept our sincere apologies for any inconvenience. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nathan Silvers Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 2:42 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 1 Lab 5a Has anyone seen when trying to create a route group the gateways do not all appear as available devices, they appear when configuring route patterns but not under route groups. -- The biggest mistake people make in life is not trying to make a living at doing what they most enjoy. - Malcolm Forbes Nathan Silvers inline: image001.png___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 1 Lab 5a
Yes, This pre-configuration could be part of troubleshooting. On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Nathan Silvers silver...@gmail.com wrote: hahaha nice.. gotta love how detailed the solutions guide is at times... hey its all pre-configured but you have to remove this configuration before you can do the configuration you we tell you to do.. thanks guys! On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.comwrote: You might have assigned gateway directly under route-pattern. If you remove gateway from route-pattern then you should be to add into route-group/route-list. Regards, Ramcharan Arya On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Nathan Silvers silver...@gmail.comwrote: Has anyone seen when trying to create a route group the gateways do not all appear as available devices, they appear when configuring route patterns but not under route groups. -- The biggest mistake people make in life is not trying to make a living at doing what they most enjoy. - Malcolm Forbes Nathan Silvers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- The biggest mistake people make in life is not trying to make a living at doing what they most enjoy. - Malcolm Forbes Nathan Silvers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
