[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail SRST
Steve, Voicemail while in SRST can be accomplished using the redirecting number in order to reach the required mailbox. Alternate extension are not required. Justin Barksdale CCIE #29866 Sent from my iPhone 4. On Sep 3, 2012, at 8:00 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: > Voicemail SRST ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Terms Violation
Can the moderator please remove these people? I do not enjoy reading through pages and pages of spam that clearly violates the terms and conditions of this board. Justin Barksdale CCIE# 29866 Sent from my iPhone 4. On Aug 2, 2012, at 5:40 AM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to >ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at >ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: NEW LAB in Voice (steven smith) > 2. Re: NEW LAB in Voice (Dan Quinlan (daquinla)) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:35:54 +0530 > From: steven smith > To: Nicolas MICHEL > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NEW LAB in Voice > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Nicolas, > > I got it you are in a category which uses but still still no no i am nt > > I myself leaving this no need to ban > > Whoever is interested can email me so that we can work together. > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Nicolas MICHEL wrote: > >> Hi Guys. >> >> Can someone ban this guy please ? >> >> Read enough BS for this year .. >> >> Thanks >> >> Nic >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:41 AM, steven smith >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is not a spam or anything neither we are cheating anyone! >>> >>> This is what i think and as per me it is right. >>> >>> When we go to school they teach subjects we note it in our book. >>> >>> While exam comes we read that but still once we complete that we ran here >>> and there collecting more info e.g self study or question set or see last 3 >>> years question set what other people got it till now & we do those also! >>> >>> It's a human nature that everyone want to pass in 1st attempt so that do >>> not mean it is a cheating, Either it is you or anyone else. >>> >>> Now we know the subject here and we are making our final touch to get >>> other close workbooks so that we can clear it easily , It do not mean that >>> we do not know the technology or skipping the tech >>> definitely everyone needed last touch workbooks which help him to pass >>> the test you can consider it last 3 years question set or whatever... >>> >>> Now i have a questions to you >>> >>> When in school we came out after test everyone says and ask discuss about >>> how you did what was the answer you put is it anything difference >>> >>> Same in every every every institute when you enroll you first make >>> friends then discuss learn with him go for attempt he comes out then he >>> update to others and that is how it works so is that mean these are >>> cheating if it is then we should close all the training institutes. >>> >>> Writing my above email do not mean or hurt anyone echo its just a truth >>> what i am trying to say. >>> >>> Now even in school we have some different cases !!! ha ha like they will >>> refer the workbooks but say i do not , some will say coming in front yes i >>> did and passed bec of this , some will take write all the >>> questions/solutions in their own format and then say they have made it by >>> their own to proof them they are more good then others >>> >>> Some will do hard work take and search and verify what other did is it >>> right or not from those workbooks again this is natural >>> >>> I don't want to make this email big so that people will not even study >>> and through in dusbi.. >>> >>> I wish everyone good luck and success in life I have purchase the same >>> bec i do not have 3 attempts for free where i go in lab and look at the >>> questions come out make it and then again and then again and 4th or 5th >>> attempt i will go and pass :) >>> >>> Josh friend >&
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
If this is the case then the address you are pointing to at the pstn is incorrect. If you add the ntp server to the router and do show ntp status the router MUST be syncing with an external source or UCM will not sync. Furthermore a reboot is not required on UCM or ther router. Simply add the address to UCM and do utils ntp restart from cli. The key is that the ntp source the router is syncing with must be valid. Sent from my iPhone 4. On Sep 19, 2011, at 1:12 AM, Ray wrote: > Ntp is not slow when i put the ntp master command on HQ router and the cucm > syn right the way. i took off the ntp master from the hq and only have ntp > server and ntp source lo0. and reboot the cucm and the hq. and let it set for > 4hrs to 5hrs and the cucm would not syn, but the moment i put the ntp master > it syns within 2 mins... you can try it in you lab and let me know.. make > sure you reboot the cucm and the hq router... > > From: Justin Barksdale > To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" > Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:14 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp > > NTP is by nature slow. An earlier post pointed out the correct method. If > the question wants you to sync hq with the pstn and then ccm with hq then the > ntp master command will break this requirement. All that is required on the > HQ router is ntp server x.x.x.x > > This is also mentioned in Vic's class class as well as Cisco documentation. > The important key here is that the ntp master command can cause you to > override a valid external time source and thus can be very dangerous. As > long as the ntp server command points to a valid and reachable ntp source > then the hq router will sync and you WILL be able to sync ucm without the ntp > master command. > > Justin Barksdale > CCIE# 29866 > Voice > > Sent from my iPhone 4. Please excuse any typos. > > On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:39 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: > > > Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp > ___ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp
NTP is by nature slow. An earlier post pointed out the correct method. If the question wants you to sync hq with the pstn and then ccm with hq then the ntp master command will break this requirement. All that is required on the HQ router is ntp server x.x.x.x This is also mentioned in Vic's class class as well as Cisco documentation. The important key here is that the ntp master command can cause you to override a valid external time source and thus can be very dangerous. As long as the ntp server command points to a valid and reachable ntp source then the hq router will sync and you WILL be able to sync ucm without the ntp master command. Justin Barksdale CCIE# 29866 Voice Sent from my iPhone 4. Please excuse any typos. On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:39 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: > Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ntp ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
Verify also lincode, framing, and clocking. I am not sure what the default is on 26XX. Sent from my iPhone 4. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind
Check your isdn switch type. Sent from my iPhone 4. On Jul 18, 2011, at 9:46 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: > MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3bind) (steven moran) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 1. Re: issue with transcoder registering to the cme locally (Johnny Soong)
You have to have max ephone and max-dn under telephony-service. Sent from my iPhone 4. On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:28 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to >ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at >ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: issue with transcoder registering to the cme locally > (Johnny Soong) > 2. Re: RE : BUG ? QoS with MLP LFI (Friderich Claude) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:25:32 + > From: Johnny Soong > To: , > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] issue with transcoder registering to >the cme locally > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > > Changed the name to hqxcoder without the dash in both Telephony-service and > sccp ccm group association. Did a shut, no shut on the dspfarm profile. no > sccp and sccp. Still not register. Look at show dspfarm all. Shown it is > trying to associate. The question is why it trying. I also removed the > version from sccp ccm. it didn't help. > > > > > voice-card 0 > no dspfarm > dsp services dspfarm > > sccp local FastEthernet0/0.20 > sccp ccm 10.10.200.3 identifier 1 version 5.0.1 > sccp ip precedence 3 > sccp > > or > > > sccp local FastEthernet0/0.20 > sccp ccm 10.10.200.3 identifier 1 > sccp ip precedence 3 > sccp > > > > sccp ccm group 1 > bind interface FastEthernet0/0.20 > associate ccm 1 priority 1 > associate profile 1 register hqxcoder > signaling dscp af31 > ! > dspfarm profile 1 transcode > codec g711ulaw > codec g729r8 > maximum sessions 1 > > Telephony-service > sdspfarm units 1 > sdspfarm transcode sessions 1 > sdspfarm tag 1 hqxcoder > ip source-address 10.10.200.3 port 2000 > max-conferences 8 gain -6 > transfer-system full-consult > associate application SCCP > > show sds units > mtp-1 Device:hqxcoder TCP socket:[-1] UNREGISTERED > actual_stream:0 max_stream 0 IP:0.0.0.0 0 Unknown 0 keepalive 0 > max-mtps:1, max-streams:2, alloc-streams:0, act-streams:0 > > > HQ-RTR#sh dspfarm all > Dspfarm Profile Configuration > Profile ID = 1, Service = TRANSCODING, Resource ID = 1 > Profile Description : > Profile Admin State : UP > Profile Operation State : ACTIVE IN PROGRESS > Application : SCCP Status : ASSOCIATION IN PROGRESS > Resource Provider : FLEX_DSPRM Status : UP > Number of Resource Configured : 1 > Number of Resource Available : 1 > Codec Configuration > Codec : g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 > Codec : g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 > > > > From: tih...@gmail.com > To: johnnyso...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] issue with transcoder registering to the cme > locally > Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:30:25 +0200 > > > > > > > Try to remove ? from name, let it hqxcode > > > Best regards, > Tamer Ismail > > > > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com > [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Johnny Soong > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 8:08 PM > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] issue with transcoder registering to the cme > locally > > I am having issue to get the transcoder to register with the cme locally. > When i register it to the callmanager, it worked fine. > > > > NAME: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP on Slot 0 SubSlot 4", DESCR: "PVDMII DSP > SIMM with one DSP" > PID: PVDM2-16 , VID: NA , SN: FOC09160E5B > NAME: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP on Slot 0 SubSlot 5", DESCR: "PVDMII DSP > SIMM with one DSP" > PID: PVDM2-16 , VID: V01 , SN: FOC10130MCT > > > > sccp local FastEthernet0/0.20sccp ccm 10.10.200.3 identifier 1 version 5.0.1 > sccp ip precedence 3 > sccp > ! > sccp ccm group 1 > bind interface FastEthernet0/0.20 > associate ccm 1 priority 1 > associate profile 1 register hq-xcoder > signaling dscp af31 > ! > dspfarm profile 1 transcode > codec g711ulaw > codec g711alaw > codec g729ar8 > codec g729abr8 > codec g729r8 > maximum sessions 1 > associate application SCCP > telephony-service > sdspfarm units 1 > sdspfarm transcode sessions 1 > sdspfarm tag 1 hq-xcoder > ip source-address 10.10.200.3 port 2000 > max-conferences 8 gain -6 > transfer-system full-consult > > HQ-RTR#sh sds u > mtp-1 Device:hq-xcoder TCP socket:[-1] UNREGISTERED > actual_stream:0 max_stream 0 IP:0.0.0.0 0 Unknown 0 keepalive 0 > max-mtps:1, max-streams:2, alloc-streams:0, act-streams:0 > >
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP trunk to PSTN - CM 8.0 not sending SDP
It is the same concept. On H.323 it is called outbound fast start. In SIP it is Early-Offer. Essentially it is sending the call setup information in the initial invite. I am not sure if UCM 8.0 supports it directly. I know it is available in 8.5. Typically, if you are connecting to a provider then a border element will be in place between UCM and the provider. In the case of Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE) the command to invoke Early-Offer is available on both the individual SIP dial-peers or globally under voice service voip. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:16 PM, George Goglidze wrote: > outbound fast start on SIP it's on h323. > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Justin Barksdale wrote: > >> In order for the SDP information to be sent with the invite outbound fast >> start is required. >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:00 PM, > > wrote: >> >>> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to >>>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. SIP trunk to PSTN - CM 8.0 not sending SDPheader in SIP >>> INVITE packet (Mark Davis) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:16:26 -0500 >>> From: Mark Davis >>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP trunk to PSTN - CM 8.0 not sending SDP >>>header in SIP INVITE packet >>> Message-ID: >>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >>> >>> Got CUCM 8.0 configured with a SIP trunk for PSTN calls. I've got "Media >>> Termination Point Required" enabled on the trunk but I've confirmed that >>> CM >>> is not sending any SDP information to the PSTN, which is what they are >>> expecting. What am I missing? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mark >>> -- next part -- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ___ >>> CCIE_Voice mailing list >>> CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice >>> >>> >>> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 60, Issue 58 >>> ** >>> >> >> >> ___ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP trunk to PSTN - CM 8.0 not sending SDP header in SIP INVITE packet (George Goglidze)
Early-offer (outbound fast-start in H.323) is required. If you are using CUBE then the outgoing dial-peer needs the early offer command under it. You can also put this command under: voice service voip sip early-offer forced Justin Barksdale ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP trunk to PSTN - CM 8.0 not sending SDP
In order for the SDP information to be sent with the invite outbound fast start is required. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:00 PM, wrote: > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to >ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at >ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. SIP trunk to PSTN - CM 8.0 not sending SDPheader in SIP > INVITE packet (Mark Davis) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:16:26 -0500 > From: Mark Davis > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP trunk to PSTN - CM 8.0 not sending SDP >header in SIP INVITE packet > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Got CUCM 8.0 configured with a SIP trunk for PSTN calls. I've got "Media > Termination Point Required" enabled on the trunk but I've confirmed that CM > is not sending any SDP information to the PSTN, which is what they are > expecting. What am I missing? > > Thanks, > Mark > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > > -- > > ___ > CCIE_Voice mailing list > CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > > > End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 60, Issue 58 > ** > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.1x AD integration with MS AD
If this is a new install why not install 8.X. It allows for filters to be applied thus allowing more flexibility with AD. If this is an existing deployment that you are activating AD integration on then why not talk to the customer and have them upgrade. If they are as big as their AD user size would suggest then they should have UCSS to provide for the upgrade at no charge. Sent from my iPhone 4. On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:52 AM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: > Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.1x AD integration with MS AD ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] About Channel Selection Order (Julien Krieger)
It is best practice to set the channel selection order opposite what the PSTN provider does as to avoid glare. The lab is not so much best practice as it is doing what the proctor is asking in the manner in which they are asking. Justin Sent from my iPhone 4. On Jan 22, 2011, at 12:00 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to >ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at >ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: About Channel Selection Order (Julien Krieger) > 2. Re: AAR display (Miron Kobelski) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:11:42 +0100 > From: Julien Krieger > To: bruno > Cc: ccie_voice > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] About Channel Selection Order > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"; >DelSp="yes" > > Vick, guys, > Can you please give us your thoughs on this. > > But again, unless clearly stated in your lab exam to do it one way, > otherwise best practise applies. > This is not something I made up. > I am refering to IPExpert materials (books, videos) and SRND. > > Julien > > Le 22 janv. 2011 ? 13:07, "bruno" a ?crit : > >> hello, >> reverse or same chanel? why julien said it's same.Below is what he >> said >> >> "You need to make sure that you are following the best practices in >> terms of what the SRND states with regards to "GLARE". >> >> if your provider is sending you calls on the 1st channel (1 -> 24), >> then you must send outgoing calls in the same selection order (1 -> >> 24) >> >> but, if your provider is sending you calls on the 24th channel? (24 - >>> 1), then you must send outgoing calls in the same selection order >> (24 -> 1) >> >> Before configuring your side, make a call from a pstn source and >> find out the selection order of your provider. >> >> This is real life and CCIE lab >> " >> >> >> -- Original -- >> From: "George Goglidze"; >> Date: Sat, Jan 22, 2011 02:54 AM >> To: "bruno"; >> Cc: "ccie_voice"; >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] About Channel Selection Order >> >> Hi Bruno, >> >> Just make sure it's reverse of what the Telco is using, to make sure >> you don't try to seize the same channel from both sides at the same >> time. >> >> Regards, >> >> >> 2011/1/21 bruno >> Hello expert, >> ? >> I see this "The Channel Selection Order?which defines the order the >> system ???hunts??? for available channels. The logic here is reverse >> d from a numerical perspective, as the channels are considered to be >> top at 1 and bottom at 24, therefore Top Down selection will select >> channel 1 first"? in some doc.? i want to know what 's best pratice >> in real life or in ccie lab. top-down or bottom-up? >> ? >> Best Regards, >> Bruno >> >> ___ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> ___ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > -- > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:51:15 +0100 > From: Miron Kobelski > To: Michael Luo > Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" , >Roger K?llberg > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR display > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi, > > for RDNIS you need "isdn outgoing ie redirect" > > HTH > kobel > > 2011/1/22 Michael Luo > >> I have ""isdn outgoing display-ie" on the D channel. H323 gateway sent out >> the caller ID. But it doesn't seem to send the "redirect party number". >> Not sure why. >> >> 2011/1/22 Roger K?llberg >> >> Hi Michael, >>> >>> It most certainly also applies to H323 GW's, but you must also add "isdn >>> outgoing display-ie" to the serial interface for the D channel. >>> >>> Sincerely >>> >>> *Roger K?llberg* >>> CCIE #26199 (Voice) >>> Consultant >>> Cygate AB >>> Eric Perssons v?g 21, SE-217 62 MALM? >>> >>> -- >>> *Fr?n:* Michael Luo [hout...@gmail.com] >>> *Skickat:* den 22 januari 2011 01:57 >>> *Till:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >>> *?mne:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR display >>> >>> Never mind. It's the "redirect IE" checkbox on outbound gateway. >>> Interesting thing was, this only applies to MGCP but
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] One Week Lab Experience
Anyone attending the OWLE December 13-17 in San Jose? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
