Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST with Unity Connections
Check out the use of DTMF patterns in the following document: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cusrst/admin/sccp_sip_srst/configuration/guide/srst_voicemail.html -matthew On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:20 AM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, As I gues there are following ways to integrate SRST with Unity Connection through PRI: 1) when the IP phone are in SRST mode, configure the *isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number*, so that the RDNIS will be send over PSTN Route to HQ Unity Connection, and it can select the correct Mailbox. But I have an issue with the following - Let the Users press the Voicemail Button on their IP Phones in SRST mode and hear their messages. Well, for that that I have to configure the VM Pilot number in call-manager-fallback (or CME SRST) as the PSTN Global number. But when that call will come to Unity, (where the Users are present with 4 digit extensions), how to strip unnecessary digits from ANI, so that the Unity Connection can select the correct users mailbox? VM Profile does not work in that case any more. And the VM Hunt Pilot, setting for Calling Number Translation to is not a good idea. As I know, there are several ways: 1) Configure the Secondary Extension for those users as global PSTN Number 2) Or use the Initial Unity Connection with Global Numbers for users, and have the VM Profile which will expand the 4 digits extension to respective Global PSTN Numbers. Is there another/better way? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE License
Agree with the earlier messages. What you're describing is not a real world scenario in any way. In the off-chance that something this obscure is asked as part of the CCIE lab, I'd suggest that you would be OK to use either CUE license unless you are explicitly told otherwise, or ask the proctor. -matthew On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: I do not think that using you want to try to use CUE as backup as I believe that would only allow you access to VM stored on CUE when in SRST. I would think that you would prefer to manipulate the dial plan under SRST to use the PSTN to get calls to your UCEx VM. On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:10 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, thank you very much for your answer. But now look, If I have CUCM license in CUE, and the Router goes to SRST mode, that license will work for SRST IP Phones through SIP Notify or Subscribe MWI option. If we are using CUCME License in CUE, it also works for SRST IP Phones either through SIP notify or Subscribe MWI. Now imagine, that we have CUCM with Unity Connection at HQ, and the Remote Branch Router is having CUE module. *But the CUCM does not use this CUE module for Voice Mail.* CUE Voice Mail system is going to be used only when the Remote Branch goes into SRST. So if we upload the CUCM license, there will be no problem, as this license can work for SRST IP Phones. Also if we upload the CUCME License, it will also work, as there is no need to register CUE with CUCM. So which License is better to use in such case? I am not using either CUCM or CUCME, I am using only SRST for CUE. On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: If you have CME then CME, if you have CUCM then CUCM license. SRST does not dictate the license. Rc Sent from my iPhone On Jan 6, 2012, at 4:02 AM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: When configuring CUE for SRST (Traditional or CME), and assuming that CUE will not operate for CUCM - it will operate only for SRST, which license is better to upload to CUE? CUCM and CCME? Because, for SRST both license works fine. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New Lab #2 - CUE ntp
Also, make sure that 10.10.110.3 is indeed acting as an NTP server. If it's a router, ntp master and ntp source to the interface that has the IP 10.10.110.3, etc. I know that I typically forget to put the static route back to the CUE module since you can get session/console access with the service-module ip/default gateway set, but no external traffic without the static route. -matthew On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:14 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.comwrote: ping 10.10.110.3 - and see if it pings. then take a look at the Integrated Service Engine Interface, to see the default gateway set. On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: What commands? Sent from my iPhone On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:53 AM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Verify that CUE can reach the NTP IP Address. and the CUE module has the default gateway set On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: HI, I am working on the new lab #2. When configuring CUE the question asks for the primary NTP server to be 10.10.110.3. The default is lo1, 10.10.115.1 When I enter that IP address, I get an error : I could not reach 10.10.110.3 using NTP. If 10.10.110.3 really is an NTP server, then there may be a firewall blocking NTP packets. NTP uses UDP port 123. Any thoughts? Thanks, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New Lab #2 - CUE ntp
Is ntp source set on the router to the interface with the IP you're trying to pull NTP from? -matthew On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: Here are my NTP commands on the router Ntp server 10.10.110.1 NTP master 9 I did confirm the default route and static route Rc Sent from my iPhone On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Matthew Saskin m...@saskin.net wrote: Also, make sure that 10.10.110.3 is indeed acting as an NTP server. If it's a router, ntp master and ntp source to the interface that has the IP 10.10.110.3, etc. I know that I typically forget to put the static route back to the CUE module since you can get session/console access with the service-module ip/default gateway set, but no external traffic without the static route. -matthew On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:14 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: ping 10.10.110.3 - and see if it pings. then take a look at the Integrated Service Engine Interface, to see the default gateway set. On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: What commands? Sent from my iPhone On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:53 AM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Verify that CUE can reach the NTP IP Address. and the CUE module has the default gateway set On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.comwrote: HI, I am working on the new lab #2. When configuring CUE the question asks for the primary NTP server to be 10.10.110.3. The default is lo1, 10.10.115.1 When I enter that IP address, I get an error : I could not reach 10.10.110.3 using NTP. If 10.10.110.3 really is an NTP server, then there may be a firewall blocking NTP packets. NTP uses UDP port 123. Any thoughts? Thanks, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls to CUE fail over WAN
The initial SIP offer specifies G.729 for media, which the (original) dial-peer can't negotiate since it is fixed at g.711. After setting an appropriate inbound dial-peer, even though G711 is the primary choice in the voice-class, G.729 is what is negotiated since the initial INVITE specifies G729. -matthew On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:26 PM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com wrote: Yep it is, but it still works. I think because the inbound dial-peer still has g729 in it even though it's not the 1st choice. John -Original Message- From: brajesh kumaR [mailto:brjku...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 11:58 AM To: datucha123 datucha123 Cc: John McGaughey (jomcgaug); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls to CUE fail over WAN But as per voice class codec still preference one is g711ulaw codec which is on incoming dial-peer same codec as outbound peer. On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:00 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Nice to hear that you have solved the issue. The solution is correct. When you a have a Voice-Class Codec that has the G711 in it, then the Xcoder is not invoked as the G711 is supported by the incoming dial-peer. In such cases, you have to force the incoming dial-peer from CUCM (or any other sources) to use the G729, so that xcoder will get invoked. On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:44 AM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com wrote: Nevermind. I figured it out. I created a separate inbound dial-peer with g729 and that caused the xcoder to get invoked. voice class codec 1 codec preference 1 g711ulaw codec preference 2 g729r8 dial-peer voice 36002 voip voice-class codec 1 incoming called-number 3600 dtmf-relay rtp-nte no vad dial-peer voice 3600 voip destination-pattern 3600 session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:10.10.202.2 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw no vad Before I had it with only this dial-peer. dial-peer voice 3600 voip destination-pattern 3600 session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:10.10.202.2 incoming called-number 3600 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw no vad I guess if the inbound dial-peer can't satisfy the codec it fails. But if it does, and the outbound dial-peer does not, then it invokes the xcoder. John From: bkvalent...@gmail.com [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 6:42 PM To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls to CUE fail over WAN Did you enable cube? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com Date: Tue, Dec 27, 2011 7:27 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls to CUE fail over WAN To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hello, I'm in Workbook 2, Lab 8, question 4.5. I have CUE setup properly and calls between CME phones roll successfully to voicemail. However, they fail to roll to voice mail when an HQ phone calls a BR2 phone. The answer guide says to configure an xcoder on the BR2 router. Here's my config. sccp local Vlan400 sccp ccm 10.10.202.1 identifier 1 version 7.0 sccp ! sccp ccm group 1 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate profile 1 register br2-xcoder ! dspfarm profile 1 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 codec g729r8 maximum sessions 4 associate application SCCP telephony-service sdspfarm units 1 sdspfarm transcode sessions 4 sdspfarm tag 1 br2-xcoder authentication credential admin cisco xml user pvadmin password cisco 15 max-ephones 10 max-dn 10 no-reg both ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000 url services http://10.10.202.2/voiceview/common/login.do url authentication http://10.10.202.1/CCMCIP/authenticate.asp pvphone cisco voicemail 3600 max-conferences 12 gain -6 web admin system name admin password cisco transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Dec 28 2011 00:02:05 Here's the dial-peer to CUE. dial-peer voice 3600 voip destination-pattern 3600 session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:10.10.202.2 incoming called-number 3600 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw no vad A sh sccp shows the xcoder registered. BR2-RTR#sh sccp SCCP Admin State: UP Gateway Local Interface: Vlan400 IPv4 Address: 10.10.202.1 Port Number: 2000 IP Precedence: 5 User Masked Codec list: None Call Manager: 10.10.202.1, Port Number: 2000 Priority: N/A, Version: 7.0, Identifier: 1 Trustpoint: N/A Transcoding Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE Active
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Emergency Calls (911 or 999)
In practice, the PS-ALI database contains everything the PSAP needs (in theory), hence no need for calling name to go with the call. In the lab, do only what is asked, nothing more, nothing less. If there is no explicit requirement to ensure calling party name is displayed, don't worry about it. Remember, it's not a test of best practices or real-world situations. -matthew On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Experts, I want to know best practice of sending caller-name for emergency calls. Usually Telco doesn't forward calling party name to PSAP it sends calling number only. PSAP uses ALI database (which is seperate secured from PSTN) to find the location of caller. Is there a specific reason ( regulatory or practical reason ) why telco strip caller-name for 911/999 calls? In our CUCM or CCME in exam , should we strip caller-name of Emergency calls ? ( if so , additional configuration step needed) K.W. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Lab Guidance Req !
I'm using a combination of VM's, physical phones, and dynamips to run virtual routers for my home lab - about the only things that can't really be done with dynamips are some QOS, CUE, T1's, and media resources, but that's about it. My total investment in my home lab is well under $1500 and I can probably do 75-80% of the blueprint material. 5 x phones - 7960s/7961's VMware server - 2 x quad core athlon processors, 16gb ram, 2x750gb hdd, ESXi 4.0 On that VMware server I'm running a full CCIE lab (pub/sub/cups/uccx/ucxn), as well as 4 x XP desktops for IP communicator, CAD installed on a few as well as a virtualized linux server running 4 virtual routers under dynamips. -matthew On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: I think the least expensive and less time consuming method is to use remote rack rental. They have all the hardware needed to practice. That said, plan ahead and have different vendors so that if say Remote lab A is down, you can schedule with remote lab b or c and not waste your study time. Also make sure they support remote phone connections so that you can use your local resources (cisco router and phones) to connect them in to have hands on phone use. That all said a Pod is nice as you can check things out and test anytime. Here are my recommendation to save money and build a pod. I am running all my servers on a VMWare EXSi 5 server w/i7 870, 8 GB RAM, 4 HDD, 2 NIC's and using resource pooling. From other post with edits: - PSTN phone can be 7960 so you can save big there! 3 or more 7961 or 7962 Phones should be fine, use soft phones or move phones from pod to pod (ie move CUCM hardware phone to CME when needed for testing) - 1 2801 w/256MB RAM,w/128MB Flash, 1 PVDM2-16, 1 VWIC-2MFT-T1, 1 HWIC-4ESW (this will be BR1) - 1 2801 w/256MB RAM,w/128MB Flash, 1 PVDM2-16, 1 VWIC-2MFT-T1 (this will be HQ) - 1 2801 w/256MB RAM,w/128MB Flash, 1 PVDM2-16, 2 VWIC-2MFT-T1, 1 VWIC-2MFT-E1(this will be PSTN) - 1 3560 or 3750 switch - NM-CUE or AIM-CUE, NM is more powerful but AIM is cheaper. (this will go into your 2821) - 1 VWIC-2MFT-T1/E1 (this will go into your 2821) - 1 HWIC-4ESW (this will go into your 2821) You save money using the VWIC-2MFT-T1 and VWIC-2MFT-E1 over the programable ones, you just have to remember that you need to know the commands for programing the card just in case. You will want more PVDM module(s) for testing but you can get by at first with this. Also you can shut down one router and move PVDM over to do the more demanding testing. You can also get by with 64MB of Compact Flash for most of the routers, just look at the requirements of the IOS you want to install. You will need more for the CME router. Some will say you can't use 2801 but I am currently running two in my pod (including my PSTN) and it is working well. Hope this helps some On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Michael Miller kf4...@gmail.com wrote: The latest list of hardware and software that you'll see in the lab can be found on the Cisco Learning Network. https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-5292 Thanks, Michael On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Muhammad Zubair muhammad.zub...@gmail.com wrote: My Friend the link you send to me ? is that updated one... in software section it is showing CCM version 4.1(3) with latest SR ? Can you believe that CCIE Logo is new but . interesting the things which you wrote is like a sea. ok any idea how much it cost total. where to start and how to use that efficiently ? confused totally On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, AJ BG ciscoie2...@gmail.com wrote: Muhammad, · Stay away from GNS3, you will end up troubleshooting GNS3 instead of troubleshooting real voice issues. · You will need a server with at least 16GB ram; don’t forget that you have to have 5 virtual servers. You don’t need FXO for the current version. I agree with Emanuel, I would get four 2800 series routers, you would need to have PVDMS, T1 and E1 cards, CUE module, switch module, a layer 3 switch, and at least 6 type B phones. You can get it a little bit cheaper from ebay, or closely follow this group study treads and time to time people sell their equipment all at once maybe you can bargain and get it really cheap. · If you haven’t seen the CCIE blue print yet. I suggest you check the following link. You will have a good idea what you will need after you checked the blueprint. cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/voice/lab_equipment.html · This is one investment that can really pay off . Thanks, Joe On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Muhammad Zubair muhammad.zub...@gmail.com wrote: Emanuel i m scared buddy, i think 3rd world war started for me. right now i have 2821 with FXO card n another 2821 without. also i can arrange one or 2 2600 series. before that i had setup my virtual machines on my laptop which has 8Gb ram and simulation on
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Lab Guidance Req !
Of course. Speaking personally, I know enough about CUE and PSTN connectivity that I don't need to spend time focusing on my home lab. I basically use my home lab for day-to-day studying, testing out scenarios, etc. I also use remote labs (via proctorlabs) for full lab simulations. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:38 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.comwrote: QoS, CUE T1 and Media Resources are very very important on the exam. T1 and Media Resources are one of the Major requirements on the exam, I think. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Matthew Saskin m...@saskin.net wrote: I'm using a combination of VM's, physical phones, and dynamips to run virtual routers for my home lab - about the only things that can't really be done with dynamips are some QOS, CUE, T1's, and media resources, but that's about it. My total investment in my home lab is well under $1500 and I can probably do 75-80% of the blueprint material. 5 x phones - 7960s/7961's VMware server - 2 x quad core athlon processors, 16gb ram, 2x750gb hdd, ESXi 4.0 On that VMware server I'm running a full CCIE lab (pub/sub/cups/uccx/ucxn), as well as 4 x XP desktops for IP communicator, CAD installed on a few as well as a virtualized linux server running 4 virtual routers under dynamips. -matthew On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: I think the least expensive and less time consuming method is to use remote rack rental. They have all the hardware needed to practice. That said, plan ahead and have different vendors so that if say Remote lab A is down, you can schedule with remote lab b or c and not waste your study time. Also make sure they support remote phone connections so that you can use your local resources (cisco router and phones) to connect them in to have hands on phone use. That all said a Pod is nice as you can check things out and test anytime. Here are my recommendation to save money and build a pod. I am running all my servers on a VMWare EXSi 5 server w/i7 870, 8 GB RAM, 4 HDD, 2 NIC's and using resource pooling. From other post with edits: - PSTN phone can be 7960 so you can save big there! 3 or more 7961 or 7962 Phones should be fine, use soft phones or move phones from pod to pod (ie move CUCM hardware phone to CME when needed for testing) - 1 2801 w/256MB RAM,w/128MB Flash, 1 PVDM2-16, 1 VWIC-2MFT-T1, 1 HWIC-4ESW (this will be BR1) - 1 2801 w/256MB RAM,w/128MB Flash, 1 PVDM2-16, 1 VWIC-2MFT-T1 (this will be HQ) - 1 2801 w/256MB RAM,w/128MB Flash, 1 PVDM2-16, 2 VWIC-2MFT-T1, 1 VWIC-2MFT-E1(this will be PSTN) - 1 3560 or 3750 switch - NM-CUE or AIM-CUE, NM is more powerful but AIM is cheaper. (this will go into your 2821) - 1 VWIC-2MFT-T1/E1 (this will go into your 2821) - 1 HWIC-4ESW (this will go into your 2821) You save money using the VWIC-2MFT-T1 and VWIC-2MFT-E1 over the programable ones, you just have to remember that you need to know the commands for programing the card just in case. You will want more PVDM module(s) for testing but you can get by at first with this. Also you can shut down one router and move PVDM over to do the more demanding testing. You can also get by with 64MB of Compact Flash for most of the routers, just look at the requirements of the IOS you want to install. You will need more for the CME router. Some will say you can't use 2801 but I am currently running two in my pod (including my PSTN) and it is working well. Hope this helps some On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Michael Miller kf4...@gmail.com wrote: The latest list of hardware and software that you'll see in the lab can be found on the Cisco Learning Network. https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-5292 Thanks, Michael On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Muhammad Zubair muhammad.zub...@gmail.com wrote: My Friend the link you send to me ? is that updated one... in software section it is showing CCM version 4.1(3) with latest SR ? Can you believe that CCIE Logo is new but . interesting the things which you wrote is like a sea. ok any idea how much it cost total. where to start and how to use that efficiently ? confused totally On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, AJ BG ciscoie2...@gmail.com wrote: Muhammad, · Stay away from GNS3, you will end up troubleshooting GNS3 instead of troubleshooting real voice issues. · You will need a server with at least 16GB ram; don’t forget that you have to have 5 virtual servers. You don’t need FXO for the current version. I agree with Emanuel, I would get four 2800 series routers, you would need to have PVDMS, T1 and E1 cards, CUE module, switch module, a layer 3 switch, and at least 6 type B phones. You can get it a little bit cheaper from ebay, or closely follow this group study treads and time to time people sell their equipment all at once maybe you can bargain and get it really cheap. · If you haven’t seen the CCIE blue
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Lab Guidance Req !
I use virtual audio cable (http://software.muzychenko.net/eng/vac.htm) to create a dummy audio driver within windows XP. This will let you run applications that require audio (eg; IP communicator) under VMware. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Matthew Saskin m...@saskin.net wrote: Of course. Speaking personally, I know enough about CUE and PSTN connectivity that I don't need to spend time focusing on my home lab. I basically use my home lab for day-to-day studying, testing out scenarios, etc. I also use remote labs (via proctorlabs) for full lab simulations. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:38 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: QoS, CUE T1 and Media Resources are very very important on the exam. T1 and Media Resources are one of the Major requirements on the exam, I think. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Matthew Saskin m...@saskin.net wrote: I'm using a combination of VM's, physical phones, and dynamips to run virtual routers for my home lab - about the only things that can't really be done with dynamips are some QOS, CUE, T1's, and media resources, but that's about it. My total investment in my home lab is well under $1500 and I can probably do 75-80% of the blueprint material. 5 x phones - 7960s/7961's VMware server - 2 x quad core athlon processors, 16gb ram, 2x750gb hdd, ESXi 4.0 On that VMware server I'm running a full CCIE lab (pub/sub/cups/uccx/ucxn), as well as 4 x XP desktops for IP communicator, CAD installed on a few as well as a virtualized linux server running 4 virtual routers under dynamips. -matthew On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: I think the least expensive and less time consuming method is to use remote rack rental. They have all the hardware needed to practice. That said, plan ahead and have different vendors so that if say Remote lab A is down, you can schedule with remote lab b or c and not waste your study time. Also make sure they support remote phone connections so that you can use your local resources (cisco router and phones) to connect them in to have hands on phone use. That all said a Pod is nice as you can check things out and test anytime. Here are my recommendation to save money and build a pod. I am running all my servers on a VMWare EXSi 5 server w/i7 870, 8 GB RAM, 4 HDD, 2 NIC's and using resource pooling. From other post with edits: - PSTN phone can be 7960 so you can save big there! 3 or more 7961 or 7962 Phones should be fine, use soft phones or move phones from pod to pod (ie move CUCM hardware phone to CME when needed for testing) - 1 2801 w/256MB RAM,w/128MB Flash, 1 PVDM2-16, 1 VWIC-2MFT-T1, 1 HWIC-4ESW (this will be BR1) - 1 2801 w/256MB RAM,w/128MB Flash, 1 PVDM2-16, 1 VWIC-2MFT-T1 (this will be HQ) - 1 2801 w/256MB RAM,w/128MB Flash, 1 PVDM2-16, 2 VWIC-2MFT-T1, 1 VWIC-2MFT-E1(this will be PSTN) - 1 3560 or 3750 switch - NM-CUE or AIM-CUE, NM is more powerful but AIM is cheaper. (this will go into your 2821) - 1 VWIC-2MFT-T1/E1 (this will go into your 2821) - 1 HWIC-4ESW (this will go into your 2821) You save money using the VWIC-2MFT-T1 and VWIC-2MFT-E1 over the programable ones, you just have to remember that you need to know the commands for programing the card just in case. You will want more PVDM module(s) for testing but you can get by at first with this. Also you can shut down one router and move PVDM over to do the more demanding testing. You can also get by with 64MB of Compact Flash for most of the routers, just look at the requirements of the IOS you want to install. You will need more for the CME router. Some will say you can't use 2801 but I am currently running two in my pod (including my PSTN) and it is working well. Hope this helps some On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Michael Miller kf4...@gmail.comwrote: The latest list of hardware and software that you'll see in the lab can be found on the Cisco Learning Network. https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-5292 Thanks, Michael On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Muhammad Zubair muhammad.zub...@gmail.com wrote: My Friend the link you send to me ? is that updated one... in software section it is showing CCM version 4.1(3) with latest SR ? Can you believe that CCIE Logo is new but . interesting the things which you wrote is like a sea. ok any idea how much it cost total. where to start and how to use that efficiently ? confused totally On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, AJ BG ciscoie2...@gmail.com wrote: Muhammad, · Stay away from GNS3, you will end up troubleshooting GNS3 instead of troubleshooting real voice issues. · You will need a server with at least 16GB ram; don’t forget that you have to have 5 virtual servers. You don’t need FXO for the current version. I agree with Emanuel, I would get four 2800 series routers, you would need to have PVDMS, T1 and E1 cards, CUE module, switch module
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP bindings
Look up using an external file (either via TFTP or on the router flash) for the easiest (in my opinion) way to accomplish manual DHCP address binding within a single pool. In fact, I'm fairly certain that a number of us responded with various was to accomplish this in an earlier email thread. -matthew On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Emanuel Damasceno aedamasc...@gmail.comwrote: Hello experts, We can't just ignore all the messages we see here. And the last guy who mentioned about DHCP manual bind, that really drew my attention. My knowledge goes as far as the documents I read. In all those documents, I really didn't see a way to make a manual bind without using more than 1 pool. I think those guys come and say they saw lab 1, or 2, or 3, or whatever, they just wanna scare us. If somebody really thinks this is authentic, please respond to this e-mail. I am NOT talking about Lab X, nor I wanna screw with Cisco's NDA. I wanna know about this DHCP manual binding with one pool. *Emanuel Damasceno* ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange behavior on MGCP gateways
I'd look a bit further, the silence is not causing the call to terminate - what about calls being muted, etc. What do the q931 debugs show when the call gets disconnected? On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:02 PM, ccielabrat ccielab...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed a weird thing while testing MGCP. If I call out to my pstn phone and answer the call by pressing the answer soft key , the call will disconnect after about two minutes. If I answer the call with the speaker button , it stays up forever. I'm guessing the problem is I don't have handsets on any of my phones , so when I answer with the answer softkey , the phone is off hook and sending dead air packets. Somehow , mgcp see this as an error condition after two minutes or so and kills the call. If the call is on speaker, I guess it picks up enough noise to keep the call from being considered inactive. Weird. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Group digit manipulation / TEHO
Route group manipulations that occur within route list membership are for that route list only. As an example, if I have the following RL/RG's RL-HQ: RG-HQ RL-BR1: RG-BR1 RL-BR2: RG-BR2 RL-HQ-BR1-TEHO: RG-BR1 (**), RG-SLRG I can make calling party modifications in the RG-BR1 denoted with (**) without impacting the RG-BR1 reference in the RL-BR1 route list. -matthew On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Emanuel Damasceno aedamasc...@gmail.comwrote: Hello Experts, I was labbing this weekend (Lab 5A IPExpert), and I started trying out things to clarify any doubts I would have. I didn't have enough time on my sessions to try this out, and I am wondering if you guys can give me any input on this. I create route groups for HQ (RG-HQ), and BR1 (RG-BR1) sites with its respective Route Lists. I also create a route list for HQ calling BR1 PSTN (RG-BR1 Standard Local Route Group). If I choose to manipulate CALLING numbers on the route groups inside the route list for TEHO, would I be altering the Route Group manipulation first created? I was sticking with Calling/ed party transformation patterns... Thanks in advance for any input *Emanuel Damasceno* ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6
Option 60 (VCI / Vendor Class Information), at least for Cisco phones, is the same for the same model, so if indeed all IP phones are the same type, they'll send the same VCI, meaning you can't use dhcp classes to manually bind separate IP addresses. Given that, the only option I'm aware of is to use a dhcp binding file hosted (for example) on a TFTP server. See the following for reference: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t11/feature/guide/gtdhcpsm.html -matthew On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Excellent method thanks for publishing. option 60 VCI values are practically used for Lightweight Wireless Access Points to find the WLC. Cisco has published option 60 ascii strings for all access points. (it's something like Cisco AP c1240). Nowhere I could find ascii string for 7965 phones. Decoding your hex value gives ascii string Cisco Systems, Inc. IP Phone CP-7960? BTW , CCIE lab has all 7965 phones as mentioned in cisco website. Thanks On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Mohammed Al Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding DHCP it can be done. The configuration should be as follow. This will work for different phone models which is the case in CCIE LAB as Phone 1 model is different from Phone 2 model in SC. ** ** *STEP 1* Configure DHCP class with random value for option 60. ** ** ip dhcp class SCPH1 option 60 hex 123456 ** ** ip dhcp class SCPH2 option 60 hex 123456 ** ** *STEP 2* Configure DHCP Pool as below ** ** ip dhcp pool SC-POOL network 142.102.66.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 142.102.66.1 option 150 ip CUCM IP* class SCPH1 address range 142.102.66.11 142.102.66.11 class SCPH2 address range 142.102.66.12 142.102.66.12 ** ** *STEP 3* Use the commands “debug ip dhcp server packet” and “debug ip dhcp server class”. The output will be as follow: ** ** Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: Sending notification of DISCOVER: Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 0030.94c3.e5ab *!!!... This is my SC Phone 1 MAC Address* Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: remote id 020ac0a8641f001f Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: circuit id Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: Seeing if there is an internally specified pool class: Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 0030.94c3.e5ab *!!!... This is my SC Phone 1 MAC Address* Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: remote id 020ac0a8641f001f Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: circuit id Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: input does not contain option 82 Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: Searching for a match to ' option 60 * 436973636f2053797374656d732c20496e632e2049502050686f6e652043502d3739363000 *' in class SCPH1 *!!!... The underlined value is the correct option 60 value for SC Phone 1* ** ** *STEP 4* Reconfigure the correct option 60 value for phone 1. ** ** ip dhcp class SCPH1 no option 60 hex 123456 option 60 hex * 436973636f2053797374656d732c20496e632e2049502050686f6e652043502d3739363000 * ** ** Steps 3 4 can be reused to find out and correct option 60 value for phone 2. ** ** Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Robert Schuknecht *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2011 12:02 PM *To:* 'Abel ...'; 'datucha123 datucha123' *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6 ** ** Hi, ** ** SIP early offer is similar to H323 Fast-Start. With SIP EO the INVITE includes the SDP with the possible Media Options, Codecs for example. Without an NTP/Transcoder CUCM is not able to do EO on SIP Trunks. ** ** But, regarding the DHCP Part, there I am totally lost. I know how to configure DHCP on IOS, so that each host will become his “own” IP Address, every time. Its done with the host and client-id commands under the DHCP Pools. But, I have no glue hwo to do for a couple of devices with only ONE DHCP Pool. The way I do it I need 2 Pools, minimum. ** ** Could you please provide a complete Link to the documentation which explains how to do it? That would be great! ** ** /Robert ** ** *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *Im Auftrag von *Abel ... *Gesendet:* Montag, 21. November 2011 00:48 *An:* datucha123 datucha123 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6 ** ** Well, the DHCP issue can be done easy if you look 5 minutes on cisco.comdocumentation, by Early offer what you mean? no interdigit timeout? On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:22 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Do
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6
But to the original point, if the requirement is manual reservations * without* creating multiple dhcp pools, this won't work. -matthew On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: Or maybe you can do a DHCP client reservation, something like this ip dhcp pool Server_static host 10.0.0.10 255.255.255.0 client-identifier 0102.0010.0012.34 http://blog.ioshints.info/2007/09/assigning-server-ip-addresses-with-dhcp.html On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Excellent method thanks for publishing. option 60 VCI values are practically used for Lightweight Wireless Access Points to find the WLC. Cisco has published option 60 ascii strings for all access points. (it's something like Cisco AP c1240). Nowhere I could find ascii string for 7965 phones. Decoding your hex value gives ascii string Cisco Systems, Inc. IP Phone CP-7960? BTW , CCIE lab has all 7965 phones as mentioned in cisco website. Thanks On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Mohammed Al Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding DHCP it can be done. The configuration should be as follow. This will work for different phone models which is the case in CCIE LAB as Phone 1 model is different from Phone 2 model in SC. ** ** *STEP 1* Configure DHCP class with random value for option 60. ** ** ip dhcp class SCPH1 option 60 hex 123456 ** ** ip dhcp class SCPH2 option 60 hex 123456 ** ** *STEP 2* Configure DHCP Pool as below ** ** ip dhcp pool SC-POOL network 142.102.66.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 142.102.66.1 option 150 ip CUCM IP* class SCPH1 address range 142.102.66.11 142.102.66.11 class SCPH2 address range 142.102.66.12 142.102.66.12 ** ** *STEP 3* Use the commands “debug ip dhcp server packet” and “debug ip dhcp server class”. The output will be as follow: ** ** Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: Sending notification of DISCOVER: Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 0030.94c3.e5ab *!!!... This is my SC Phone 1 MAC Address* Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: remote id 020ac0a8641f001f Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: circuit id Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: Seeing if there is an internally specified pool class: Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 0030.94c3.e5ab *!!!... This is my SC Phone 1 MAC Address* Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: remote id 020ac0a8641f001f Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: circuit id Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: input does not contain option 82 Nov 21 14:43:46.981: DHCPD: Searching for a match to ' option 60 * 436973636f2053797374656d732c20496e632e2049502050686f6e652043502d3739363000 *' in class SCPH1 *!!!... The underlined value is the correct option 60 value for SC Phone 1* ** ** *STEP 4* Reconfigure the correct option 60 value for phone 1. ** ** ip dhcp class SCPH1 no option 60 hex 123456 option 60 hex * 436973636f2053797374656d732c20496e632e2049502050686f6e652043502d3739363000 * ** ** Steps 3 4 can be reused to find out and correct option 60 value for phone 2. ** ** Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Robert Schuknecht *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2011 12:02 PM *To:* 'Abel ...'; 'datucha123 datucha123' *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6 ** ** Hi, ** ** SIP early offer is similar to H323 Fast-Start. With SIP EO the INVITE includes the SDP with the possible Media Options, Codecs for example. Without an NTP/Transcoder CUCM is not able to do EO on SIP Trunks. ** ** But, regarding the DHCP Part, there I am totally lost. I know how to configure DHCP on IOS, so that each host will become his “own” IP Address, every time. Its done with the host and client-id commands under the DHCP Pools. But, I have no glue hwo to do for a couple of devices with only ONE DHCP Pool. The way I do it I need 2 Pools, minimum. ** ** Could you please provide a complete Link to the documentation which explains how to do it? That would be great! ** ** /Robert ** ** *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *Im Auftrag von *Abel ... *Gesendet:* Montag, 21. November 2011 00:48 *An:* datucha123 datucha123 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6 ** ** Well, the DHCP issue can be done easy if you look 5 minutes on cisco.comdocumentation, by Early offer what you mean? no interdigit timeout? On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:22 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Do you mean under the DHCP
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to bypass VMWare found pop up after powering up CUCM ?
Use the vsphere remote console... On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Voiper datapack...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Friends :) I moved my VMware CUCM image to a different server and when I power up I get the pop up (attached) mentioning This system has been identified as a VMWare server and I have to click on Continue and again click on Agree on the next pop up every time I start my CUCMs. As I don't have a monitor connected to the ESXi box, and I use the vsphere client to connect to ESXi, I will need to either get a monitor and keyboard for the ESXi or find a way to bypass the pop up. I googled but came up empty. Most topics on Operarting system not found.I am using Demo version of Call Manager 7.1.0. on ESXi 5 (same issue with esxi 4 too) Any help will be thanked. Voiper ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to bypass VMWare found pop up after powering up CUCM ?
use the vsphere remote console, hit enter. What version of CUCM are you running? 7.1(x) shouldn't give this error on boot, earlier versions may. On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Voiper datapack...@gmail.com wrote: Forgot to attach file Thanks, Voiper On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Voiper datapack...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Friends :) I moved my VMware CUCM image to a different server and when I power up I get the pop up (attached) mentioning This system has been identified as a VMWare server and I have to click on Continue and again click on Agree on the next pop up every time I start my CUCMs. As I don't have a monitor connected to the ESXi box, and I use the vsphere client to connect to ESXi, I will need to either get a monitor and keyboard for the ESXi or find a way to bypass the pop up. I googled but came up empty. Most topics on Operarting system not found.I am using Demo version of Call Manager 7.1.0. on ESXi 5 (same issue with esxi 4 too) Any help will be thanked. Voiper ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST Gatekeeper
What does the rest of your configuration on the SRST router look like? Do you have the requisite dial peers in place to direct calls from SRST registered phones to the gatekeeper? Without that you're not going to get very far...the SRST router has no knowledge of the callmanager gatekeeper configuration. -matthew On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:18 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I have a problem with SRST to Gatekeeper calls. When the IP Phone are registered with CUCM calls to CUCME through GK works just fine. But as soon as I will shutdown the CUCM Service on all servers, so that the IP Phones will register with SRST Router, the outgoing calls to CUCME through the GK fail. But the inbound call to SRST IP Phone through the GK from CUCME works fine. SRST Config: *interface Loopback0 ip address X.X.X.X 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CUCM ipaddr Y.Y.Y.Y 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id srst h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1# h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr Z.Z.Z.Z* * * *call-manager-fallback max-conferences 4 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult ip source-address X.X.X.X port 2000 max-ephones 10 max-dn 10 no-reg system message primary SRST moh music-on-hold.au multicast moh 239.5.5.6 port 16384 time-zone 32 time-format 24 date-format dd-mm-yy* GK Config: *gatekeeper zone local CUCME test.com A.A.A.A zone local CUCM test.com zone prefix CUCM 1... gw-priority 10 ccm_2 zone prefix CUCM 1... gw-priority 9 ccm_1 zone prefix CUCM 1... gw-priority 8 srst zone prefix CUCM 2... gw-priority 10 ccm_2 zone prefix CUCM 2... gw-priority 9 ccm_1* * zone prefix CUCM 2... gw-priority 8 srst zone prefix CUCME 3... zone prefix CUCME 5... gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology gw-type-prefix 3#* gw ipaddr B.B.B.B 1720 gw-type-prefix 2#* arq reject-unknown-prefix no shutdown * Maybe there is a known issue with SRST and Gatekeeper finctionality. Or maybe SRST does not work with GK at all? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 8.6 and CUPS 8.6 NTP issue
A CCM publisher always runs an NTP server to provide time services to the rest of the CCM cluster - this also extends to adjuncts like CUPS, which by default (and non configurable as far as I know) pulls time from the cluster publisher that it is integrated to. -matthew On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Ravindra Lakpriya lakpr...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Guys, Im setting up a testbed on vmware workstation with CUCM 8.6 and CUPS 8.6. Im using the windows domain controller as the NTP server. i have notice once i went through the initialization wizard of CUPS automatically it changes its NTP to CUCM publisher. But CUCM publisher is sync to external NTP and CUCM is not running any NTP service on publisher it self. Once i went through the troubleshooter from CUPS i notice its keeps on warning me about the NTP and from the platform management there is no way to add or remove NTP servers. Can we remove the external NTP sync and configure CUCM 8.6 publisher as the NTP server ? Any help on this is really appreciated. -- Ravindra Lakpriya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Expert mock labs
There are no base configs for CUCM (and UCXN, UCCX, etc.) per se. It's mostly just server hostnames IP addresses, plus some basic simple integration in the case of UCXN and UCCX. Your best bet for a home lab is to get the various application servers to a usable starting point - OS/App installed and IP addresses assigned, etc and then take a VMware snapshot to use as a starting point for all labs. -matthew On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Mike mik...@msn.com wrote: Hi all, ** ** I have my own lab with 2811’s, HWIC4s, 7961 phones and VMWARE for all UC servers. In my RS days I had my own gear and could load up labs with no issues. ** ** My question is will I be able to load up mock labs on my routers and UC servers? If so how? I’m sure the router configs are text files, but are the CM configs tar files? Bulk imports? How do I can the base configs into CM, Unity Cx , Presence and UCCX? ** ** ** ** Thanks, Mike CCIE #17982m (RS) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] thoughts on plan / type / name requirements forani / dnis
It's less telco specific as it is geography-specific. At this point there are still a large number of NPA's where 7D dialing is permitted. From NANPA, ~129 NPA's require 10D dialing with some exceptions: http://www.nanpa.com/nas/public/npasRequiring10DigitReport.do?method=displayNpasRequiring10DigitReport -matthew On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.comwrote: Slightly OT: is the US shifting to allowing 10D or 1+10D for all calls or is it still highly telco specific? Is 7D still used? I thought that many cities require 10D even for local calls. Obviously-not-living-in-the-US Anthony On 16 Oct 2011, at 16:38, Brian btmulg...@gmail.com wrote: thanks a lot Kshitij, i am not too familiar with US telco requirement so this is good to know. Sent from my iPad On 15 Oct 2011, at 20:39, Kshitij Singhi martinian.ksin...@gmail.com martinian.ksin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Brian, That's quite a common requirement for Telcos. (not so much for 11 digit calls but definitely for the international calls) There are quite a few Service Providers who expect one of the following (pertaining only to international calls) If 011 is prefixed, then they will pass the call only if it is flagged as unknown. If 011 is not being sent across, then they will pass the call only if it is flagged as international. From a Gateway perspective, what we usually do is make use of the following command to set the plan/type on the Serial Interface: interface serial x/y/z:23 isdn map address ^011 plan isdn type unknown (or plan unknown type unknown depending on what the Telco expects) (this obviously pertains to calls where the 011 is being sent across - be careful with the command since it changes the calling/called number plan/type). For calls where the 011 is not sent across, it's safer to use translation profiles on the outgoing dial peers. For MGCP, it's all done on the CUCM and translations are eventually leveraged for sending the correct plan/type/number of digits in SRST. On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Brian Mulgrew btmulg...@gmail.combtmulg...@gmail.com btmulg...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the response Kshitij just curious - but what is the thinking behind sending type as unknown when not presenting leading digits in the US? Brian On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Kshitij Singhi martinian.ksin...@gmail.commartinian.ksin...@gmail.com martinian.ksin...@gmail.com wrote: Here is what I had followed: ALWAYS send a plan of ISDN. If it has been stated that the Telco expects a specific plan/type, then ensure that the plan/type is sent in the ani/dnis. Also, for an outgoing call ensure that you take care of the digits seen on the calling phone ONLY if specified in the paper. If it has not been specifically stated, then for called number: 1. Send a plan of ISDN and type of subscriber for 7 digit calls (US) 2. Send a plan of ISDN a type of national for 11 digit calls (US) (assuming the Telco does NOT expect the leading 1) 3. Send a plan of ISDN and type of international for International calls (US) (assuming the Telco does not expect the leading 011) 4. Send a plan of ISDN and type of unknown for 11 digit calls (US) (assuming the Telco expects the leading 1) 5. Send a plan of ISDN and type of unknown for international calls (US) (assuming the Telco expects the leading 011) 6. Send a plan of ISDN and type of unknown for 911 calls. For non-US sites: 1. Send a plan of ISDN and type of subscriber for local calls 2. Send a plan of ISDN and type of international for international calls 3. For emergency numbers, send a plan of ISDN and type of unknown. For the calling number: 1. Send a plan of ISDN and type of subscriber for 7 digit calls. (US) 2. Send a plan of ISDN and type of national for 11 digit calls. (US) 3. Send a plan of ISDN and type of international for international calls. (US) 4. Send a plan of ISDN and type of national for emergency calls For non US sites: 1. Send a plan of ISDN and type of subscriber for emergency calls. 2. Send a plan of ISDN and type of subscriber for local calls 3. Send a plan of ISDN and type of international for international calls. On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 7:21 AM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voicehttp://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MRGMRGL
It shouldn't matter provided, in the example provided, each MRG contains only resources of the specified type. Precedence for a MRG within an MRGL should only come into play if your MRG's contain the same types of resources. On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, eng_firasoq...@yahoo.com eng_firasoq...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear All, If we have to configure MTP,Xcoder,hd_Conference in the HQ site then we will configure 3 MRG MTP_MRG,Xcoder_MRG,conf_MRG after that we will create MRGL for hd_hq_MRGL but now what is correct order for MRG inside the MRGL Regards ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM - UCCS upgrading options
If UCSS wasn't purchased initially or within 90 days (if I recall correctly) of the initial purchase, they can't purchase UCSS to enable the upgrade. They need to re-purchase 8.0 software + licenses. Matthew Saskin msas...@gmail.com 203-253-9571 July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run Please support the Leukemia Lyphoma Society http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Saeed IDris saee...@gmail.com wrote: *Hi everyone,* *I need to ask regarding Cisco UCCS, is it enough to include the below part number according to number of users in case this is new implementation: * *Other question, one of my clients already is hosted CUCMBE version 6.5.1 but now they plan to upgrade their CUCM to version 8.0 …..They didn’t have UCCS ….what is the possible Scenario to achieve such upgrade?* ** *Regards,* *Saeed * ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SQL replication check\fix Q.
No dblhelper in the lab as it's not installed by default on the
callmanager. You typically have to grab it from another CM that has it,
or get it from TAC.
-matt
Jonathan Charles wrote:
Jumping in late, just subscribed... do they not have DBLHelper on the
Publisher? Is it there on the CCIE lab? If not, do we have to rebuild
the publication manually?
Jonathan
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Mark Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the time of publishing those last WBs we did not have a Subscriber - and
perhaps the wording wasn't the best.
Now (and for sometime now) we do have both Pub (10.x.200.21) and a Sub
(10.x.200.20) live in every pod.
Hope that clears some things up :)
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
CCSI #31583
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.
On Feb 23, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Mark Cardwell wrote:
Question and concern. On the ebooks and printed WB, It states that there is
no publisher (.20) and just to assume a publisher. So given how can we fix
replication on a server that does not exist. I am very confused and am
wonder what you are referring to when you state this is an inherent
troubleshooting task. And another thing I am confused on is if there is a
Pub and a Sub then why am I logging into the Sub (according to the WB
documentation).
Cheers!
Mark Cardwell | System Engineer | Presidio Networked Solutions |
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Cell: 571.225.0132 | Office: 301.623.2000| FAX:
301.313.2400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 1:19 PM
To: Moore, Neil
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SQL replication check\fix Q.
SA user (even though mentioned in that article) is not ever to be used.
Use local authentication instead - will work every time - even between
boxes.
And yes - SQL replication is broken on all of our Subscribers in every pod -
and that is no accident! :)
It is there as an inherent troubleshooting task - which is a testable
'topic' in the lab - so beware - things may not always be as they seem on
the surface!
HTH,
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
CCSI #31583
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.
On Feb 22, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Moore, Neil wrote:
Hi there folks!
I'm after any thoughts\tips on checking the sql replication's all good
before you start you lab configs (virtual and real).
My last couple of vrack sessions I've had lots of probs with this. The
replication is never setup and running at the start of the vrack sessions so
I update lmhosts (checked the cache is good), check connectivity etc, and
then tried the following procedure:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_tech_note09186a00801d11a6.shtml
for the sa account pwrd I'm trying cisco and blank, I've reset these on both
boxes aswell, same. Seems to me like some sort of authentication issue.
I've even put dblhelper on the box that can't sort it this always works
a treat in the field!!
So I guess my questions are:
What check do you folks do to check the replication (add a dev check the
device table?)
What procedure do you follow to get the replication up and running at the
start of your vrack sessions (proctorlabs.com)?
Is this a 'task' for all proctorlab vrack sessions only? (is this just a
vmare 'feature'?)
In the real lab would we be expected to do this kind of sql troubleshooting,
reseting sa pwrds, assigning roles etc in SQL?
What am I missing!!?
Any help'd be appreciated.
Cheers,
Neil (UK)
consulting | technology | outsourcing
BT Lynx is a Cisco Systems Gold Certified Partner, Microsoft Gold Certified
Partner and HP Business Partner Select / Authorised Services Delivery
Partner.
Sales Offices: Sheffield, London City
DISCLAIMER:
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ('Intended
Recipient') to whom it is addressed. It may contain information, which is
privileged and confidential. Accordingly any dissemination, distribution,
copying or other use of this message or any of its content by any person
other than the Intended Recipient may constitute a breach of civil or
criminal law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the Intended
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table
Don't quote me, but I believe audio is fixed as 24k for G.729 and 80K for G.711 not sure on video... -matt Earnieball78 wrote: Hello all, I'm am trying to find out where one would fine the table that lists the audio and video codec rates information required to configure locations based CAC in CCM? Thanks! Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table
It was my understanding that CallManager uses the fixed numbers (24k/80k) for location based CAC regardless of the sampling rate. Can anyone confirm/deny this? -matt Earnieball78 wrote: Matt, Thanks for your response. Well, that would depend on the sampling rate. I don't have any problems with the voice codecs, however I do want to use the table for the video part. Anybody knows where they got the table that is at the begining of the workbook? Thanks! */Matthew Saskin [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote: Don't quote me, but I believe audio is fixed as 24k for G.729 and 80K for G.711 not sure on video... -matt Earnieball78 wrote: Hello all, I'm am trying to find out where one would fine the table that lists the audio and video codec rates information required to configure locations based CAC in CCM? Thanks! Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)
What do you mean scripting? To the first point, you'll have to deal with your telco to have them point 800 numbers inbound. Will they just be routing an 800 number to your existing DID's (like remote call-forward) or will the 800 numbers be assigned directly to your circuits and they'll route DNIS digits inbound. Regardless, handling these within CME is just going to be a matter of setting up proper dial-peers (remember incoming called-number and direct-inward-dial statements) to handle the calls and send them where they need to go (phones registered to CCME, CCM via trunks, other H.323 or SIP peers). -matt Jonathan Preston wrote: I need to provision some trunks going into CME and using scripting done in CME. Can someone please give me some guidance on this request? * Negotiate with telco to point existing 800# lines into the CME trunks. * Conduct appropriate scripting activiteis to make 800#s functional withing CME Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MoH Question
I don't believe so - the held device will attempt to either subscribe to the multicast group (or request a unicast stream) without any care as to whether or not it is actually receiving any audio. -matt Earnieball78 wrote: Hello all, I have question regarding MoH. In a scenario where you provide both multicast and unicast streams, is it possible for the MRG/MRGL to automatically switch between multicast and unicast depending on the capabilities of the network? Let's say that I have two MRGs, one with multicast enabled, and one without. In the MRGL, I have the multicast MRG on top, and the unicast MRG below. So the end result would be, with a multicast enabled network, to always use multicast MoH. But let's say that multicast is not enabled on a particular segment of a network, and the phones are still using the same MRGL. Since multicast will not work, will it switch to unicast? I have tried this in my lab but I keep getting tone on hold. Hence, my question is: Is it even possible for MoH resources to behave in this fashion? Thanks! /Christian Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR1 and Cat6K showed registered but CCM is NOT
Cisco lists a specific method on their site: -Add a recognizable phone via the web interface (set description = TEST PHONE, etc...) -Run a query on all nodes in the cluster to see if the database entry is there -matt Chad Stachowicz wrote: Is that really a testable topic? What is the best way to manually figure out replication is out of sync? Chad Sent from my iPhone On Dec 23, 2007, at 10:26 PM, Mark Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No DBHelper available in the real lab. Delete if there the Subscription to the CCM0301 DB on the Subscriber server, and manually set it back up again. I will have a video up on our webserver soon that you can view on specifically how to manually setup the Pub/Sub pull subscription. Cheers, Mark Snow CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) CCSI #31583 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits! Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.309.413.4097 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. On Dec 23, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Chad Stachowicz wrote: Mark how are we expected to fix replication ? Dbhelper? Thanks. Chad Sent from my iPhone On Dec 22, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Mark Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When you do a sh port on the 6608 port, what ccm server does it show reg to? Are you sure that SQL replication is fixed between pub and sub? (by default all of our pods are broken on purpose as a task for the student to fix) Mark Snow Sr Technical Instructor IPexpert, Inc. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 22, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Toyin Bakare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, I have registered BR1 and Cat6K in the CCM, when i do sh port on cat6k or sh ccm on BR1, it shows status as registered but CCM shows registration as unknown. I have restarted CCM several times, i deleted and re-add also several time. thnks
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Switch Module For 2800
If I recall correctly and you want to run PoE, you need both. One is just the switch card, the other is a daughter-card that provides PoE capabilities. -matt Daniel Galati wrote: Hello, I would like to know which module to use for the 2800 acting as the remote site. Is the module a 16 port power ESW or 16 port ES power module. Thank you. Dan
