Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New Lab Release

2011-06-05 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
I went for the lab, there is no lab 5

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of rsvpaar
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 3:25 PM
To: John Persi ; ccie_voice
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New Lab Release

Hi John,

Do u have latest lab i am ready to share the cost and discuss i saw it was same 
to same
i got in my lab

!

On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 16:28:37 +0530 John Persi 
john_pe...@yahoo.commailto:john_pe...@yahoo.com wrote

Kindly PM me if anyone ready to discuss
Thanks


From: John Persi john_pe...@yahoo.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2011 2:49 PM
Subject: New Lab Release


Hi,
Does anyone ready to discussnew lab.
I can see on cert knowledge . com but it is expensive
http:// www . certknowledge . 
com/forum/index.php?topic=39.15http://%20www%20. %20certknowledge  %20 . %20com/forum/index.php?topic=39.15
No budget already attempted for 3 times.
Regards
Jonny



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/adstream_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle]http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?
Treat yourself at a restaurant, spa, resort and much more with Rediff Deal ho 
jaye!http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://dealhojaye.rediff.com/___cmp=signaturelnk=rediffmailsignaturenewservice=deals

*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2011-05-30 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Go to service parameters, choose call manager and search for trunk and will 
find the option to make the gatekeeper h225 trunk to use 1720, and then put the 
name of your h225 trunk which is GK-TRUNK

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Randall Crumm
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 9:39 PM
To: Online Study
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

Hi,
How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2  to repflect port 1720?

Thanks,
Randall

HQ-RTR(config)#do show gatekeeper gw
GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE
=
Prefix: 3*
  Zone HQ master gateway list:
10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR

Prefix: 1#*
  Zone HQ master gateway list:
10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1
10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2
  Zone HQ prefix 1... priority gateway list(s):
   Priority 5:
10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1
10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2
  Zone HQ prefix 5... priority gateway list(s):
   Priority 5:
10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1
10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2




*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Finally, I pass the LAB :D

2011-05-24 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi Roberto,

I hope you're doing fine.
Can you please share your experience with me? I'm going for the exam very soon.
I'm really ready but I need some trick from you to complete this CCIE :)

Waiting for your feedback

Thanks
Naoufal

-Original Message-
From: Naoufal Kerboute 
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 2:32 PM
To: 'Roberto Reyes Alanis'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: Finally, I pass the LAB :D

CONGRATULATIONS MAN
GREAT JOB :D


Naoufal

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Roberto Reyes 
Alanis
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 10:54 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Finally, I pass the LAB :D

I only want say Yahooo and Tks to Naoufal Kerboute.

Y para los de America Latina salu2 y todo pa delante.

Roberto Reyes Alanis CCIE#28945.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OT: UCCX Script, Virtual Queueing

2011-05-20 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,

Check the link below, and search for the script (callkback).

http://uccx.net/uccx-7x-sample-scripts.html

Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of George Goglidze
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 6:01 PM
To: CCIE Voice online groupstudy
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OT: UCCX Script, Virtual Queueing

Hi all,

I do appologize for this OT, but I searched the whole google and big part of 
cisco.comhttp://cisco.com and couldn't find the answer to my question.

One of our customers have the following requirement:
when a caller calls, if he is in a queue too long (configured threshold), he 
will be offered an option to leave his number and the system will virtually 
keep him in a queue, and when his time comes, and agent is available, the 
system will call the user back and connect him to the agent.

ok, now I've given it a thought, and there is no way you can be in a queue on 
UCCX, if there is no Active Contact in a script.
Basically just to enter the Select Resrouce step, you must specify a contact 
that is Active otherwise it does not work.

I had an idea, which I understand is a very bad design, and very bad usage of 
UCCX Resources, but here it is: I could then place a call from the script into 
UCCX again, and create this Active contact myself. and then place this Active 
Contact into a queue, but I don't like this design because it's using double of 
resources of UCCX.

Before providing this solution to my customer, I would like to ask if anyone 
has done anything like this, and if you know a better solution of doing this.

Many thanks, and sorry for OT again, but I couldn't think of a better place to 
ask this.

Regards,


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] DUBAI EXAM

2011-05-18 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi Guys,

I feel that no one is passing the exam in Dubai, what do you think?

Thanks
Naoufal


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Finally, I pass the LAB :D

2011-05-18 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
CONGRATULATIONS MAN
GREAT JOB :D


Naoufal

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Roberto Reyes 
Alanis
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 10:54 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Finally, I pass the LAB :D

I only want say Yahooo and Tks to Naoufal Kerboute.

Y para los de America Latina salu2 y todo pa delante.

Roberto Reyes Alanis CCIE#28945.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DUBAI EXAM

2011-05-18 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
When?

From: Shady Hasan [mailto:shady@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:03 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DUBAI EXAM

I know 2 CCIEs Voice passed from Dubai :)


On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
Hi Guys,

I feel that no one is passing the exam in Dubai, what do you think?

Thanks
Naoufal

*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VoiceMail (Exam result FAILED)

2011-05-13 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

I failed, and I got 19% in voicemail, and I was sure that everything is ok, 
mailbox created with the password 12345 (as asked in the exam), forward to VM 
after 20s for all phones, MWI was working I've checked that many times. For CUE 
the same thing MWI and mailbox working, What could be wrong?

Until now I'm sure that I've tested voicemail (MWI, mailbox, password), users 
imported from CUCM as requested.

Any ideas?

Naoufal


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

2011-05-05 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

I found the below link and I want to do the same, it's very interesting and 
this is what I'm looking for exactly, but Im facing an issue and I need your 
help.
This is the script:
select resource
  selected
play prompt selected resources id
connect
  connected
end
  failed
goto start_of_queue
  queued
label start_of_queue
...

The problem is in the 1st Select_resource I stopped the call to connect to save 
the userID in a variable user, but I want to play this variable which is user 
but I can't.  My issue is how to convert this User variable which contain the 
spoken Name to a prompt and then play the same before my 2nd connect.

Any Idea?

This is really interesting scenario and we could have it in the exam, believe 
me.

Waiting for your feedback.

PS: I'm using the default spoken Name script to record the names.

Thanks a lot

Naoufal

From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:38 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi,

To use the spoken name in another script, you need two steps, at least:
1) Get User, where you can provide username, or agent extension to get the 
user info.
2) Get User Info, here you can retrieve Spoken Name into a prompt variable.

I hope this helps,

Regards,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
OK, how can I use the spoken name in another script, how to play the name of 
agent when routing the call to it ?

From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.commailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 11:01 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi,

Spoken name script's sole function is to record agent's name...

Then from any script, if you need agent's name to be played, you can play this 
back. or otherwise you can generate prompt with agent's name and surname values 
and play it back. but normally recorded prompt gives better result.

Regards,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
Hi guys,

I have some confusion regarding the spoken name script. Is there anyone who can 
help me to understand it?
What I can do with it? How I can use it? What is the goal of this script?

Thanks
Naoufal

NAOUFAL KERBOUTE
TECHNICAL MANAGER
Post Box 880, Postal Code 112, Ruwi
Sultanate of Oman
Telephone

24 835 252, 24 834 848
24 834 400, 24 836 226





Mobile

9604 2593





E-Mail

naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com

  Web  www.mhdinfotech.comhttp://www.mhdinfotech.com/


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

2011-05-05 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
I forgot to attach the link
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3306933#3306933

From: Naoufal Kerboute
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 3:58 PM
To: 'George Goglidze'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi guys,

I found the below link and I want to do the same, it's very interesting and 
this is what I'm looking for exactly, but Im facing an issue and I need your 
help.
This is the script:
select resource
  selected
play prompt selected resources id
connect
  connected
end
  failed
goto start_of_queue
  queued
label start_of_queue
...

The problem is in the 1st Select_resource I stopped the call to connect to save 
the userID in a variable user, but I want to play this variable which is user 
but I can't.  My issue is how to convert this User variable which contain the 
spoken Name to a prompt and then play the same before my 2nd connect.

Any Idea?

This is really interesting scenario and we could have it in the exam, believe 
me.

Waiting for your feedback.

PS: I'm using the default spoken Name script to record the names.

Thanks a lot

Naoufal

From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:38 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi,

To use the spoken name in another script, you need two steps, at least:
1) Get User, where you can provide username, or agent extension to get the 
user info.
2) Get User Info, here you can retrieve Spoken Name into a prompt variable.

I hope this helps,

Regards,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
OK, how can I use the spoken name in another script, how to play the name of 
agent when routing the call to it ?

From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.commailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 11:01 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi,

Spoken name script's sole function is to record agent's name...

Then from any script, if you need agent's name to be played, you can play this 
back. or otherwise you can generate prompt with agent's name and surname values 
and play it back. but normally recorded prompt gives better result.

Regards,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
Hi guys,

I have some confusion regarding the spoken name script. Is there anyone who can 
help me to understand it?
What I can do with it? How I can use it? What is the goal of this script?

Thanks
Naoufal

NAOUFAL KERBOUTE
TECHNICAL MANAGER

Post Box 880, Postal Code 112, Ruwi
Sultanate of Oman
Telephone

24 835 252, 24 834 848
24 834 400, 24 836 226





Mobile

9604 2593





E-Mail

naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com

  Web  www.mhdinfotech.comhttp://www.mhdinfotech.com/


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

2011-05-05 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Ignore it, I'm done :)
Thanks George, without your help I'll never fix it.

Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Naoufal Kerboute
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 3:53 PM
To: George Goglidze; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi guys,

I found the below link and I want to do the same, it's very interesting and 
this is what I'm looking for exactly, but Im facing an issue and I need your 
help.
This is the script:
select resource
  selected
play prompt selected resources id
connect
  connected
end
  failed
goto start_of_queue
  queued
label start_of_queue
...

The problem is in the 1st Select_resource I stopped the call to connect to save 
the userID in a variable user, but I want to play this variable which is user 
but I can't.  My issue is how to convert this User variable which contain the 
spoken Name to a prompt and then play the same before my 2nd connect.

Any Idea?

This is really interesting scenario and we could have it in the exam, believe 
me.

Waiting for your feedback.

PS: I'm using the default spoken Name script to record the names.

Thanks a lot

Naoufal

From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:38 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi,

To use the spoken name in another script, you need two steps, at least:
1) Get User, where you can provide username, or agent extension to get the 
user info.
2) Get User Info, here you can retrieve Spoken Name into a prompt variable.

I hope this helps,

Regards,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
OK, how can I use the spoken name in another script, how to play the name of 
agent when routing the call to it ?

From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.commailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 11:01 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi,

Spoken name script's sole function is to record agent's name...

Then from any script, if you need agent's name to be played, you can play this 
back. or otherwise you can generate prompt with agent's name and surname values 
and play it back. but normally recorded prompt gives better result.

Regards,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
Hi guys,

I have some confusion regarding the spoken name script. Is there anyone who can 
help me to understand it?
What I can do with it? How I can use it? What is the goal of this script?

Thanks
Naoufal

NAOUFAL KERBOUTE
TECHNICAL MANAGER

Post Box 880, Postal Code 112, Ruwi
Sultanate of Oman
Telephone

24 835 252, 24 834 848
24 834 400, 24 836 226





Mobile

9604 2593





E-Mail

naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com

  Web  www.mhdinfotech.comhttp://www.mhdinfotech.com/


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Remote Gatekeeper Troubleshooting

2011-05-04 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

I feel that this mailing list is sleeping :)
Any way I have a question and I hope that I get an answer from you guys.
I'm playing with gatekeeper and I'm thinking of different way to troubleshoot 
the connection between my local gatekeeper and a remote one (I don't have 
access to remote GK). What is the best way to troubleshoot a broken connection 
between two gatekeeper?
How can I check from debugs which prefix or default technology prefix the 
remote GK is using, or the bandwidth defined in the remote GK, let assume that 
the remote GK enable only g729 and I'm sending the call with g711, from the 
debug I'll see BRJ_INSUFFICIENT_RSC but how can I know which bandwidth is 
allocated for me so I can define a proper codec information.

Waiting for your feedbacks

Thanks a lot
Naoufal



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Finally succeeded ..Got CCIE

2011-05-04 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Congratulations man. You're the BOSS now :)


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Shrini
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 12:02 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Finally succeeded ..Got CCIE

Hi Experts,

Today I am officially announced as Voice CCIE.

Thanks to one and all for your valuable suggestions and help throughout this 
journey.

Special thanks to Vik and IP Expert team for hosting this excellent mailer list 
and helping us.

Thanks again
Shrini


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Remote Gatekeeper Troubleshooting

2011-05-04 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
No reply :s

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Naoufal Kerboute
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 1:01 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Remote Gatekeeper Troubleshooting

Hi guys,

I feel that this mailing list is sleeping :)
Any way I have a question and I hope that I get an answer from you guys.
I'm playing with gatekeeper and I'm thinking of different way to troubleshoot 
the connection between my local gatekeeper and a remote one (I don't have 
access to remote GK). What is the best way to troubleshoot a broken connection 
between two gatekeeper?
How can I check from debugs which prefix or default technology prefix the 
remote GK is using, or the bandwidth defined in the remote GK, let assume that 
the remote GK enable only g729 and I'm sending the call with g711, from the 
debug I'll see BRJ_INSUFFICIENT_RSC but how can I know which bandwidth is 
allocated for me so I can define a proper codec information.

Waiting for your feedbacks

Thanks a lot
Naoufal


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

2011-05-03 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,

Where the spoken name script save the wav files?
Also do you have any idea how to use play the name of the agent before routing 
the call to it?

Thank a lot
Naoufal

From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:38 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi,

To use the spoken name in another script, you need two steps, at least:
1) Get User, where you can provide username, or agent extension to get the 
user info.
2) Get User Info, here you can retrieve Spoken Name into a prompt variable.

I hope this helps,

Regards,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
OK, how can I use the spoken name in another script, how to play the name of 
agent when routing the call to it ?

From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.commailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 11:01 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi,

Spoken name script's sole function is to record agent's name...

Then from any script, if you need agent's name to be played, you can play this 
back. or otherwise you can generate prompt with agent's name and surname values 
and play it back. but normally recorded prompt gives better result.

Regards,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
Hi guys,

I have some confusion regarding the spoken name script. Is there anyone who can 
help me to understand it?
What I can do with it? How I can use it? What is the goal of this script?

Thanks
Naoufal

NAOUFAL KERBOUTE
TECHNICAL MANAGER
Post Box 880, Postal Code 112, Ruwi
Sultanate of Oman
Telephone

24 835 252, 24 834 848
24 834 400, 24 836 226





Mobile

9604 2593





E-Mail

naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com

  Web  www.mhdinfotech.comhttp://www.mhdinfotech.com/


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Number (Type and plan)

2011-05-03 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

I need an advice from CCIE's who already passed the exam.
In the call routing section, if the question doesn't ask for the calling number 
type and plan, do I have to set the calling number type (Sub, Nat ...) vs the 
called number or no need?
Also if the question doesn't ask for calling name do I have to restricted?

Thanks
Naoufal



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME busy-trigger-button Problems

2011-05-03 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
The max calls per button for outgoing and incoming calls

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Shrini
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 9:33 PM
To: Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME busy-trigger-button Problems

Actually max calls per button is for outgoing calls.

Below one I configured a while ago, will try later today.

Thanks
Shrini

On 5/3/2011 10:02 AM, Shrini wrote:
Hi Roig,

Try adding max-calls-per-button 5

Thanks
Shrini

On 5/3/2011 9:23 AM, Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier wrote:
Hi Shrini,

Sorry for not answering you before. I had to stop my studies for a while due to 
work :-(
Now I have tested it and  here are my conclusions

Ephone-dn 11 octo-line
 Number 4023
 Huntstop channel 5

ephone  1
 busy-trigger-per-button 4
  button  1:1 2:11
!
ephone  2
  busy-trigger-per-button 2
 button  1:2 2:11


1st call answered by phone2
2nd call answered by phone2
3rd call answered by phone 1
4th call answered by phone 1
5th call busy!

The first two calls answered by phone 2 occupy a 2 channels of shared dn 11 in 
phone 1 . So the busy trigger of phone 1 (busy trigger 4) will allow only 2 
more incoming calls.
Looking at the sh ephone before making the 5h call, 4 channels are occupied for 
phone 1. So the next call will always give busy.

Have you tested? Does it work for you? Or am I missing anything and there is a 
way to achieve this?

Thanks

ephone-1[0] Mac:0024.97AA.1B72 TCP socket:[3] activeLine:2 REGISTERED in SCCP 
ver 17/9
mediaActive:1 offhook:1 ringing:0 reset:0 reset_sent:0 paging 0 debug:0 caps:9 
privacy:1
IP:192.168.22.50 38312 7945  keepalive 16 max_line 2
button 1: dn 1  number 4001 CH1   IDLE CH2   IDLE CH3   IDLE
 CH4   IDLE CH5   IDLE CH6   IDLE CH7   IDLE
 CH8   IDLE
button 2: dn 11 number 4023 CH1   HOLD CH2   CONNECTEDCH3   HOLD
 CH4   CONNECTEDCH5   IDLE CH6   IDLE CH7   IDLE
 CH8   IDLE shared
paging-dn 9
Preferred Codec: g711ulaw
Active Call on DN 11 chan 4 :4023 192.168.22.50 20938 to 142.102.66.254 2000 
via 10.10.112.1
G729  20 bytes no vad
Tx Pkts 444 bytes 14208 Rx Pkts 228 bytes 7296 Lost 218
Jitter 78 Latency 0 callingDn -1 calledDn -1
4 calls are visible on line 2
Username: br2ph1


ephone-2[1] Mac:0024.97AA.1B49 TCP socket:[2] activeLine:2 REGISTERED in SCCP 
ver 17/9
mediaActive:1 offhook:1 ringing:0 reset:0 reset_sent:0 paging 0 debug:0 caps:9 
privacy:1
IP:192.168.22.51 45034 7945  keepalive 15 max_line 2
button 1: dn 2  number 4002 CH1   IDLE CH2   IDLE CH3   IDLE
 CH4   IDLE CH5   IDLE CH6   IDLE CH7   IDLE
 CH8   IDLE
button 2: dn 11 number 4023 CH1   HOLD CH2   CONNECTEDCH3   HOLD
 CH4   CONNECTEDCH5   IDLE CH6   IDLE CH7   IDLE
 CH8   IDLE shared
paging-dn 9
Preferred Codec: g711ulaw
Active Call on DN 11 chan 2 :4023 192.168.22.51 29502 to 142.102.66.254 2000 
via 10.10.112.1
G729  20 bytes no vad
Tx Pkts 1178 bytes 37696 Rx Pkts 295 bytes 9440 Lost 812
Jitter 158 Latency 0 callingDn -1 calledDn -1
4 calls are visible on line 2
Username: br2ph2



De: Shrini [mailto:linuxbos...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: sábado, 23 de abril de 2011 2:09
Para: Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier; 'Peter Farkas'; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Asunto: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME busy-trigger-button Problems

Roig,

This will do , lets assume you made 5 calls to the dn.

ephone-dn 10 octo
 number 1000
 huntstop channel 5   This will limit 5 calls

ephone 1
busy-trigger-per-button 4  --  3rd 4th and 5th call you can accept here
button 1:10

ephone 2
busy-trigger-per-button 2 --- 1st and 2nd call ringed here and picked 
here (3rd call will not ring here)
button 1:10

You can test vice versa.

Thanks
Shrini


From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Roig Borrell, 
Francesc Xavier
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 5:45 AM
To: Peter Farkas; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME busy-trigger-button Problems
Hi Peter,

You are right. Testing it,  the busy trigger applies in the shared line

So how could we achieve this?


shared line
 -1) Maximum 5 incoming calls into the DN
 -2) 1st phone should not receive not more than 4 incoming call and 2nd phone
Should not receive more than two


I have seen several posts proposing this config. But testing in the lab it 
doesn't work for me
Due to previous reason (busy-trigger-per-button 4)  the fifth call always hears 
busy tone

http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg19976.html


ephone-dn 10 octo
 number 1000
 huntstop 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST (name = EPNM)

2011-05-02 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

Is there any way to force phones to not take name as EPNM in SRST mode 
(Call-manager-fallback)?

Thanks
Naoufal



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

2011-05-02 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

I have some confusion regarding the spoken name script. Is there anyone who can 
help me to understand it?
What I can do with it? How I can use it? What is the goal of this script?

Thanks
Naoufal

NAOUFAL KERBOUTE
TECHNICAL MANAGER
[Description: Description: MHD_infotech]
Post Box 880, Postal Code 112, Ruwi
Sultanate of Oman
Telephone

24 835 252, 24 834 848
24 834 400, 24 836 226





Mobile

9604 2593





E-Mail

naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com

  Web  www.mhdinfotech.comhttp://www.mhdinfotech.com/



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


inline: image001.png___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

2011-05-02 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
OK, how can I use the spoken name in another script, how to play the name of 
agent when routing the call to it ?

From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 11:01 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi,

Spoken name script's sole function is to record agent's name...

Then from any script, if you need agent's name to be played, you can play this 
back. or otherwise you can generate prompt with agent's name and surname values 
and play it back. but normally recorded prompt gives better result.

Regards,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
Hi guys,

I have some confusion regarding the spoken name script. Is there anyone who can 
help me to understand it?
What I can do with it? How I can use it? What is the goal of this script?

Thanks
Naoufal

NAOUFAL KERBOUTE
TECHNICAL MANAGER
[Description: Description: MHD_infotech]
Post Box 880, Postal Code 112, Ruwi
Sultanate of Oman
Telephone

24 835 252, 24 834 848
24 834 400, 24 836 226





Mobile

9604 2593





E-Mail

naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com

  Web  www.mhdinfotech.comhttp://www.mhdinfotech.com/


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

2011-05-02 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Also please how to enter the username in the keyboard? Right now I'm just using 
Q=7 and Z=9 and the Name dialing of this user is = qz

From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 11:01 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Spoken Name Script

Hi,

Spoken name script's sole function is to record agent's name...

Then from any script, if you need agent's name to be played, you can play this 
back. or otherwise you can generate prompt with agent's name and surname values 
and play it back. but normally recorded prompt gives better result.

Regards,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
Hi guys,

I have some confusion regarding the spoken name script. Is there anyone who can 
help me to understand it?
What I can do with it? How I can use it? What is the goal of this script?

Thanks
Naoufal

NAOUFAL KERBOUTE
TECHNICAL MANAGER
[Description: Description: MHD_infotech]
Post Box 880, Postal Code 112, Ruwi
Sultanate of Oman
Telephone

24 835 252, 24 834 848
24 834 400, 24 836 226





Mobile

9604 2593





E-Mail

naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com

  Web  www.mhdinfotech.comhttp://www.mhdinfotech.com/


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 Lab 2 Task 6.3

2011-05-02 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Yes guys you're right, the 10 50 50 20 couldn't be the shape value

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Steve Denney 
(stdenney)
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 10:38 PM
To: Pablo Meneses
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 Lab 2 Task 6.3

You know, I think you're right. The 10 50 20 20 would seem to be correct for 
*share* not shape (since 50 / (10+50+20+20) = 50/100 = 1/2 = 50%).

Anyone else?

cheers, sd

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Pablo Meneses
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 7:46 PM
To: ccie voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 Lab 2 Task 6.3

Hello Experts,

I was wondering if one of you could give me an explanation on this task since I 
am a bit lost:

Workbook 2 Lab 2 Task 6.3:

The task says:

Ensure that the SRR scheduler for phones at the HQ switch shapes Q2 to 50% of 
the interface bandwidth.

On the Solution Guide, it says:

HQ-3750(config)#interface FastEthernet 1/0/2
HQ-3750(config-if)#srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 50 20 20

After I did that I got the following output:

HQ-3750#show mls qos interface fastEthernet 1/0/2 queueing
FastEthernet1/0/2
Egress Priority Queue : enabled
Shaped queue weights (absolute) :  10 50 20 20
Shared queue weights  :  10 10 60 20
The port bandwidth limit : 100  (Operational Bandwidth:100.0)
The port is mapped to qset : 2

However, I then check CCO and found the following:

The bandwidth weight for queue 1 is 1/8, which is 12.5 percent:
Switch(config)# interface gigabitethernet2/0/1
Switch(config-if)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 8 0 0 0

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/release/12.2_50_se/configuration/guide/swqos.html#wp1163879

The question is:

Why is it configured on the solution as 10 50 20 20? Shouldn't it be 
configured as 0 2 0 0 since 1/2 equals 0.5?

Looking forward to your response.

-Pablo Meneses.


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 Lab 2 Task 6.3

2011-05-02 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,

Below the solution

interface FastEthernet1/0/2
srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
priority-queue out

Q1 is configured for the PQ. We will set the shape for Q2 to be 50% (guarantee 
and rate limit traffic in Q2 to 50%). To do this we specify a value of 2 for 
Q2 = ½= 50%.

HQ-3750(config)#interface FastEthernet1/0/2
HQ-3750(config-if)#srr-queue bandwidth shape 0 2 0 0

VOILA

HQ-3750#sh mls qos interface F1/0/2 queueing
FastEthernet1/0/2
Egress Priority Queue : enabled
Shaped queue weights (absolute) : 0 2 0 0
Shared queue weights : 10 10 60 20
The port bandwidth limit : 100 (Operational Bandwidth:100.0)
The port is mapped to qset : 1

HQ-3750(config)#interface FastEthernet1/0/2
HQ-3750(config-if)# queue-set 2

Rgds
Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Steve Denney 
(stdenney)
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 10:38 PM
To: Pablo Meneses
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 Lab 2 Task 6.3

You know, I think you're right. The 10 50 20 20 would seem to be correct for 
*share* not shape (since 50 / (10+50+20+20) = 50/100 = 1/2 = 50%).

Anyone else?

cheers, sd

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Pablo Meneses
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 7:46 PM
To: ccie voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 Lab 2 Task 6.3

Hello Experts,

I was wondering if one of you could give me an explanation on this task since I 
am a bit lost:

Workbook 2 Lab 2 Task 6.3:

The task says:

Ensure that the SRR scheduler for phones at the HQ switch shapes Q2 to 50% of 
the interface bandwidth.

On the Solution Guide, it says:

HQ-3750(config)#interface FastEthernet 1/0/2
HQ-3750(config-if)#srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 50 20 20

After I did that I got the following output:

HQ-3750#show mls qos interface fastEthernet 1/0/2 queueing
FastEthernet1/0/2
Egress Priority Queue : enabled
Shaped queue weights (absolute) :  10 50 20 20
Shared queue weights  :  10 10 60 20
The port bandwidth limit : 100  (Operational Bandwidth:100.0)
The port is mapped to qset : 2

However, I then check CCO and found the following:

The bandwidth weight for queue 1 is 1/8, which is 12.5 percent:
Switch(config)# interface gigabitethernet2/0/1
Switch(config-if)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 8 0 0 0

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/release/12.2_50_se/configuration/guide/swqos.html#wp1163879

The question is:

Why is it configured on the solution as 10 50 20 20? Shouldn't it be 
configured as 0 2 0 0 since 1/2 equals 0.5?

Looking forward to your response.

-Pablo Meneses.


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP BR1 registration problem

2011-05-01 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Check the framing and the linecode should be the same as your PSTN router.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ahmed Ellboudy
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 5:05 AM
To: CCIE Voice
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP BR1 registration problem

Still did not solve it .
Any idea?

Thanks,


Ahmed Ellboudy | CCNP, CCVP.

Networking Team Leader
Raya IT - Professional Networking Services
Mobile: +20100770837
Tel  : +20238276000 Ext. 2338
Fax : +20238372930
Email  : ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.commailto:nadia_khal...@rayacorp.com
Address : El Motamayez District - 6th of October
[cid:image001.jpg@01CB8A26.89E6B660]

From: CCIE Voice [mailto:cc...@corb.net]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 2:34 AM
To: Ahmed Ellboudy
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP BR1 registeration problem

Try reloading the router.

--


On May 1, 2011, at 17:43, Ahmed Ellboudy 
ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.commailto:ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com wrote:
Dear All ,
I am facing a problem to register br1 as MGCP on the CUCM
The problem is when I use the T1 as H323 is working normally but when I need to 
use it as MGCP there is a problem in q921
As L2 be TEI Assigned forever .

I tried no isdn bind-l3 ccm
The output of the debug isdn q921 is below :
*May  1 21:09:19.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: User RX - SABMEp sapi=0 tei=0
*May  1 21:09:19.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: S4_SABME: BACKHAULED  
vsc_wants_L2_up = FALSE
*May  1 21:09:25.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: User RX - SABMEp sapi=0 tei=0
*May  1 21:09:25.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: S4_SABME: BACKHAULED  
vsc_wants_L2_up = FALSE
*May  1 21:09:26.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: User RX - SABMEp sapi=0 tei=0
*May  1 21:09:26.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: S4_SABME: BACKHAULED  
vsc_wants_L2_up = FALSE
*May  1 21:09:27.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: User RX - SABMEp sapi=0 tei=0
*May  1 21:09:27.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: S4_SABME: BACKHAULED  
vsc_wants_L2_up = FALSE
*May  1 21:09:28.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: User RX - SABMEp sapi=0 tei=0
*May  1 21:09:28.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: S4_SABME: BACKHAULED  
vsc_wants_L2_up = FALSE
*May  1 21:09:34.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: User RX - SABMEp sapi=0 tei=0
*May  1 21:09:34.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: S4_SABME: BACKHAULED  
vsc_wants_L2_up = FALSE
*May  1 21:09:35.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: User RX - SABMEp sapi=0 tei=0
*May  1 21:09:35.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: S4_SABME: BACKHAULED  
vsc_wants_L2_up = FALSE
*May  1 21:09:36.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: User RX - SABMEp sapi=0 tei=0
*May  1 21:09:36.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: S4_SABME: BACKHAULED  
vsc_wants_L2_up = FALSE
*May  1 21:09:37.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: User RX - SABMEp sapi=0 tei=0
*May  1 21:09:37.431: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q921: S4_SABME: BACKHAULED  
vsc_wants_L2_up = FALSE

Please find attached the PSTN ,BR1 configuration and image of the call manager 
for this GW.

Can anyone help me to fulfill this problem?


Thanks,


Ahmed Ellboudy | CCNP, CCVP.


Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is confidential 
and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in 
error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly 
forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or 
consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message 
by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. 
Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you 
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message.
br1mgcp.txt
MGCP.jpg
pstn.txt
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is confidential 
and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in 
error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly 
forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or 
consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message 
by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. 
Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you 
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message.


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gateway - 1 ring disconnect (7965), fastbusy (7960)

2011-04-29 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Check your source interface (bind), CUCM must be registered with the same bind 
interface mentioned in the mgcp configuration.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rrcrumm
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 8:05 AM
To: Adil Shaikh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gateway - 1 ring disconnect (7965), 
fastbusy (7960)

Hi
Did you do a show isdn status?
You may have to do a no isdn bind-l3 ccm manager on the serial interface
Also no mgcp
no mgcp bind control
mgcp bind control source interface lo0
Mgcp

Huh

Rc

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 28, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Adil Shaikh 
adil.sha...@gmail.commailto:adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,

i configured mgcp gateway on HQ RTR.

when i call from PSTN to a 7965 phone, i get fastbusy after 1 ring.
when i call from PSTN to a 7960 phone (which is set to auto answer after 2 
rings), i get fastbusy straight away.

so, i issued 'no mgcp' - waited for 60 sec to ensure it deregister and then 
issued 'mgcp' but the result does not change. i did this few times without 
success.

so, i reloaded router and then everything worked fine.


does anyone know the way to resolve this issue without reloading router?

thanks
-adil

--
  .. . .
_7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.commailto:adil.sha...@gmail.com
. .


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com

*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

2011-04-29 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Have you set ip rsvp bandwidth in the serial interface?

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vinay Kumar6
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 9:58 AM
To: Rogers Ochieng
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

Yes, it is there.

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar



From:

Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com

To:

Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN

Cc:

ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Date:

04/29/2011 10:25 AM

Subject:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC






do you have this under your IOS dspfarm profile Mtp configuration

rsvp

codec pass-through



On 29 April 2011 07:24, Vinay Kumar6 
vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.commailto:vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,

Trying to configure Location based CAC using RSVP, have done the configuration 
buut it always says not enough bandwidth even though i have given ample 
bandwidth on the serial interfaces.

Steps used to configure:

Configured MTP on the HQ and Branches-Registered to HQ and Branch DP.
Assigned the HQ and Branch MTPs to respective DPs using MRGL.
Created Location for HQ and Branch and assigned to respective DPs. Reservation 
is mandatory.
Codec used on between the regions is G729.

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

2011-04-29 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
What is the codec between regions? Make sure you're using g729 and disable the 
g722 advertising and also the iLBC

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vinay Kumar6
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:28 AM
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

Following is the config on the routers.


interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
 ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf mtu-ignore
 snmp trap link-status
 frame-relay interface-dlci 401
 ip rsvp bandwidth 40

dspfarm profile 2 mtp
 codec g729r8
 codec pass-through
 rsvp
 maximum sessions software 4
 associate application SCCP





dspfarm profile 1 mtp
 codec g729r8
 codec pass-through
 rsvp
 maximum sessions software 4
 associate application SCCP


interface Serial0/2/0.1 point-to-point
 ip address 10.10.1.2 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf mtu-ignore
 snmp trap link-status
 frame-relay interface-dlci 501
 ip rsvp bandwidth 40



Is there any step by step guide to configure or troubleshoot it?

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar




From:

Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN

To:

Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com

Cc:

ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Date:

04/29/2011 11:46 AM

Subject:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC






Yes, it is there.

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar


From:

Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com

To:

Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN

Cc:

ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Date:

04/29/2011 10:25 AM

Subject:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC






do you have this under your IOS dspfarm profile Mtp configuration

rsvp

codec pass-through



On 29 April 2011 07:24, Vinay Kumar6 
vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.commailto:vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,

Trying to configure Location based CAC using RSVP, have done the configuration 
buut it always says not enough bandwidth even though i have given ample 
bandwidth on the serial interfaces.

Steps used to configure:

Configured MTP on the HQ and Branches-Registered to HQ and Branch DP.
Assigned the HQ and Branch MTPs to respective DPs using MRGL.
Created Location for HQ and Branch and assigned to respective DPs. Reservation 
is mandatory.
Codec used on between the regions is G729.

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gateway - 1 ring disconnect (7965), fastbusy (7960)

2011-04-29 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Have you checked the status of your MTP on CUCM (make sure It’s registred)
Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Naoufal Kerboute
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:10 AM
To: Rrcrumm; Adil Shaikh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gateway - 1 ring disconnect (7965), 
fastbusy (7960)

Check your source interface (bind), CUCM must be registered with the same bind 
interface mentioned in the mgcp configuration.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rrcrumm
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 8:05 AM
To: Adil Shaikh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gateway - 1 ring disconnect (7965), 
fastbusy (7960)

Hi
Did you do a show isdn status?
You may have to do a no isdn bind-l3 ccm manager on the serial interface
Also no mgcp
no mgcp bind control
mgcp bind control source interface lo0
Mgcp

Huh

Rc

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 28, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Adil Shaikh 
adil.sha...@gmail.commailto:adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,

i configured mgcp gateway on HQ RTR.

when i call from PSTN to a 7965 phone, i get fastbusy after 1 ring.
when i call from PSTN to a 7960 phone (which is set to auto answer after 2 
rings), i get fastbusy straight away.

so, i issued 'no mgcp' - waited for 60 sec to ensure it deregister and then 
issued 'mgcp' but the result does not change. i did this few times without 
success.

so, i reloaded router and then everything worked fine.


does anyone know the way to resolve this issue without reloading router?

thanks
-adil

--
  .. . .
_7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.commailto:adil.sha...@gmail.com
. .


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com

*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*

*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

2011-04-29 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Have you checked the status of your MTP on CUCM (make sure It’s registred)
Naoufal



From: Vinay Kumar6 [mailto:vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:33 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

Codec is g729 and g722 is disabled in enterprise parameters.

From the debug on the gateways I found  a message which says RSVP Confirmation 
not required.

Warm Regards,
Vinay



From:

Naoufal Kerboute naou...@mhdinfotech.com

To:

Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN

Cc:

ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Date:

04/29/2011 01:32 PM

Subject:

RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC






What is the codec between regions? Make sure you’re using g729 and disable the 
g722 advertising and also the iLBC

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vinay Kumar6
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:28 AM
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

Following is the config on the routers.


interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip ospf mtu-ignore
snmp trap link-status
frame-relay interface-dlci 401
ip rsvp bandwidth 40

dspfarm profile 2 mtp
codec g729r8
codec pass-through
rsvp
maximum sessions software 4
associate application SCCP





dspfarm profile 1 mtp
codec g729r8
codec pass-through
rsvp
maximum sessions software 4
associate application SCCP


interface Serial0/2/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 10.10.1.2 255.255.255.0
ip ospf mtu-ignore
snmp trap link-status
frame-relay interface-dlci 501
ip rsvp bandwidth 40



Is there any step by step guide to configure or troubleshoot it?

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar


From:

Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN

To:

Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com

Cc:

ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Date:

04/29/2011 11:46 AM

Subject:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC









Yes, it is there.

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar
From:

Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com

To:

Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN

Cc:

ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Date:

04/29/2011 10:25 AM

Subject:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC









do you have this under your IOS dspfarm profile Mtp configuration

rsvp

codec pass-through



On 29 April 2011 07:24, Vinay Kumar6 
vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.commailto:vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,

Trying to configure Location based CAC using RSVP, have done the configuration 
buut it always says not enough bandwidth even though i have given ample 
bandwidth on the serial interfaces.

Steps used to configure:

Configured MTP on the HQ and Branches-Registered to HQ and Branch DP.
Assigned the HQ and Branch MTPs to respective DPs using MRGL.
Created Location for HQ and Branch and assigned to respective DPs. Reservation 
is mandatory.
Codec used on between the regions is G729.

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

2011-04-29 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Can you paste the full config of your HQ and BR1 routers. If you remove the 
rsvp, you can make calls between HQ and BR1?

From: Vinay Kumar6 [mailto:vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 3:10 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

Yes, It is registered.

Apr 29 10:47:45.600: RSVP 10.10.11.1_17198-10.10.10.1_17944[0.0.0.0]: RESV: no 
path information for 10.10.10.1

Where 10.10.10.1 is HQ MTP and 10.10.11.1 is BR MTP IP.

because of which the RSVP is not getting initiated.

Not sure how to fix this.

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar
MTS-Remote Support Centre.
IBM India Private Limited, Subramanya Arcade1, 12, Bannerghatta Main Road, 
Bangalore 560 029 (India) Telephone: Direct +91-80-40683977, Board +91-80-4068 
3000, Extn: 83977, Fax +91-80-26787711  Email : 
vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.commailto:vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com



From:

Naoufal Kerboute naou...@mhdinfotech.com

To:

Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN

Cc:

ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Date:

04/29/2011 04:21 PM

Subject:

RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC






Have you checked the status of your MTP on CUCM (make sure It’s registred)
Naoufal



From: Vinay Kumar6 [mailto:vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:33 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

Codec is g729 and g722 is disabled in enterprise parameters.

From the debug on the gateways I found  a message which says RSVP Confirmation 
not required.

Warm Regards,
Vinay

From:

Naoufal Kerboute naou...@mhdinfotech.com

To:

Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN

Cc:

ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Date:

04/29/2011 01:32 PM

Subject:

RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC









What is the codec between regions? Make sure you’re using g729 and disable the 
g722 advertising and also the iLBC

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Vinay Kumar6
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:28 AM
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC

Following is the config on the routers.


interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip ospf mtu-ignore
snmp trap link-status
frame-relay interface-dlci 401
ip rsvp bandwidth 40

dspfarm profile 2 mtp
codec g729r8
codec pass-through
rsvp
maximum sessions software 4
associate application SCCP





dspfarm profile 1 mtp
codec g729r8
codec pass-through
rsvp
maximum sessions software 4
associate application SCCP


interface Serial0/2/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 10.10.1.2 255.255.255.0
ip ospf mtu-ignore
snmp trap link-status
frame-relay interface-dlci 501
ip rsvp bandwidth 40



Is there any step by step guide to configure or troubleshoot it?

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar
From:

Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN

To:

Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com

Cc:

ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Date:

04/29/2011 11:46 AM

Subject:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC











Yes, it is there.

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar
From:

Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com

To:

Vinay Kumar6/India/IBM@IBMIN

Cc:

ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Date:

04/29/2011 10:25 AM

Subject:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP based CAC











do you have this under your IOS dspfarm profile Mtp configuration

rsvp

codec pass-through



On 29 April 2011 07:24, Vinay Kumar6 
vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.commailto:vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,

Trying to configure Location based CAC using RSVP, have done the configuration 
buut it always says not enough bandwidth even though i have given ample 
bandwidth on the serial interfaces.

Steps used to configure:

Configured MTP on the HQ and Branches-Registered to HQ and Branch DP.
Assigned the HQ and Branch MTPs to respective DPs using MRGL.
Created Location for HQ and Branch and assigned to respective DPs. Reservation 
is mandatory.
Codec used on between the regions is G729.

Warm Regards,
Vinay Kumar

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctor is DOWN

2011-04-28 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Guys, Proctor is DOWN?
Naoufal.


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS integration with LDAP

2011-04-27 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Just go ahead, no need for LDAP

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nizar Abuseni
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 10:25 AM
To: ccie_voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS integration with LDAP

Hello,

I have question regarding integration CUPS server with LDAP (AD), is it 
necessary to have the CUCM also integrated with LDAP (AD)?
Also can I use CUCM as LDAP? if yes will the directory search work? and can I 
add users?

Am trying to find a way so that I don’t want to integrate CUCM with AD, because 
I want to use different user ID’s in CUCM than user ID’s in AD. So if I don’t 
use the AD at all will be better.


Best regards,
Nizar

*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] workbook 2 lab 8

2011-04-22 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,

For unity connection check Redirection Header Delivery at SIP trunk 
configuration (outbound).
For CUE and SRST, please post your config.

Rgds,
Naoufal


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 7:56 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] workbook 2 lab 8

Hello all

I just finished my session and i was doing lab 8 from workbooks 2
something that i couldn't get to work properly was

the unity integration through sip trunk
the ring no answer and the busy were playing enter your id followed by pound 
instead of sorry extension ... is not available record your message at the 
tone
i followed the proctor-guide and still it' didn't work

also i couldn't get the MWI to work on CUE sip phones only

my config looked like this

voice register dn 1
number 3002
call-forward b2bua busy 3600
call-forward b2bua noan 3600 timeout 12
mwi
name br2 phone 4



sip-ua
mwi-server ipv4:10.10.202.2



i had the unsolicited notify enabled on the cue gui

when i was doing a refresh of the mwi i saw unity express trying to ring my 
extensions on the default mwi extensions
so i went ahead and configured the ephone dn's for mwi

still didn't work


also my sip srst didn't work

i kept getting this error



Apr 23 07:46:38.660: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Sent:
SIP/2.0 404 Not Found
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bKe43aa9be
From: 
sip:1002@10.10.201.1mailto:sip%3A1002@10.10.201.1;tag=001ae22b12c500077cb0194d-395f52ee
To: sip:1002@10.10.201.1mailto:sip%3A1002@10.10.201.1;tag=17DB834-A33
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:46:38 GMT
Call-ID: 
001ae22b-12c50006-85a48968-9fe91895@192.168.11.12mailto:001ae22b-12c50006-85a48968-9fe91895@192.168.11.12
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
CSeq: 105 REGISTER
Content-Length: 0


my sip srst looked like this

voice register pool 1
id network 10.10.201.0 mask 255.255.255.0
cor incoming ld-css default
call-forward b2bua busy 5600
call-foward b2bua noan 5600 timeout 13
codec g711u


voice register global
max-pool 2
max-dn 2



please help me out,  thank you




*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR question

2011-04-18 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,

First try to make a call from HQ and BR1 phones to CUE directly without AAR, 
once is OK then assign the AAR  group and Css to all phones and CTI ports, set 
the mask  on the voicemail profile and test. Make sure to have RP that can 
route the external phone number musk trough the local gateway.

I think it should work.

Rgds,
Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 7:51 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR question

Hello All,

I have a question
i was doing the workbook 2 lab 7
and i had a questions that involved AAR
and i got stuck

br1, br2, hq were all ucm sites

when the bandwidth between br2 and the other 2 sites (Br1, hq) wasn't enough to 
make the call AAR should kick in

the br2 phones had a mailbox with CUE (cue was registered to ucm)
I enabled AAR
i setup AAR, the AAR group applied everywhere
the AAR css, applied everywhere as well
i had the External Phone Number mask set

i created my route pattern being very specific and did all the digit 
manipulation so the call will succeed

when i went to locations and reduced the BW to 20 and resynched the BW

when i was calling br2 phone from br1 or hq. i was getting the AA for CUE and 
the called number on the pri was the external phone number mask assigned to the 
CTI Route Point
and on the display on br1/hq phone was saying not enough bw, rerouting

however when i went ahead and removed the call forward settings on BR2 phone

and when I was trying to call br2 phone by dialing the internal extension ... i 
was getting busy no messages on the phones


could you please help me understand why ?

thank you





*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TCS Capability Exchange

2011-04-18 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Thank you guys, I found it

H245SessionEstablishedFailure | waitForCapabilitiesExchange



In the beginning I ended the call once I discovered  the issue, so  I have to 
wait for the call disconnect to get this error in the debug. It was my mistake.



Thanks again

Naoufal



-Original Message-
From: Farkas Péter [mailto:wormh...@sch.bme.hu]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 12:14 PM
To: George Goglidze
Cc: Naoufal Kerboute; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TCS Capability Exchange



It is rather a timer expiration since either endpoint will send TCS.



Peter



- Original Message -

From: George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com

Date: Sunday, April 17, 2011 6:35 pm

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TCS Capability Exchange

To: Naoufal Kerboute naou...@mhdinfotech.com

Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com





 I don't have a call manager available right now, but if you keep

 searching for h245 it said something about capability failure if I remember 
 correctly.



  Attach the trace file if you have it, I'll have a look.



  Sent from my iPad



  On 17 Apr 2011, at 05:54, Naoufal Kerboute 
 naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:



   Hi guys,

  

  

  

   I'm working on CUBE, and I'm facing the TCS issue, I know that I

 have to uncheck wait for Far End H.245 Terminal Capability Set, but I'm 
 looking how to identify this in the SDL traces.

  

   Anyone know the exact word who describe the issue in the logs?

  

  

  

   Thanks a lot

  

  

  

   Naoufal

  

  

  

 **

 **

 **

 ***   * This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message

 and any attachments may contain information that is privileged and /

 or confidential and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *   * It is

 intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not

 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not

 authorized to read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *

  * use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you

 have received this message in error, please notify the sender

 immediately and delete the message and any attachments from your

 system. *  

 **

 **

 **

 ***

  

   ___

   For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,

 please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

 ___

  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,

 please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com




*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR question

2011-04-18 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Don't forget to add external phone number mask to CTI ports and also transcoder 
in your BR2 for CUE

From: Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 7:56 AM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR question

thank you
I'm going to try it this Friday
2011/4/17 Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com
Hi,

First try to make a call from HQ and BR1 phones to CUE directly without AAR, 
once is OK then assign the AAR  group and Css to all phones and CTI ports, set 
the mask  on the voicemail profile and test. Make sure to have RP that can 
route the external phone number musk trough the local gateway.

I think it should work.

Rgds,
Naoufal

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
 On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 7:51 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR question

Hello All,

I have a question
i was doing the workbook 2 lab 7
and i had a questions that involved AAR
and i got stuck

br1, br2, hq were all ucm sites

when the bandwidth between br2 and the other 2 sites (Br1, hq) wasn't enough to 
make the call AAR should kick in

the br2 phones had a mailbox with CUE (cue was registered to ucm)
I enabled AAR
i setup AAR, the AAR group applied everywhere
the AAR css, applied everywhere as well
i had the External Phone Number mask set

i created my route pattern being very specific and did all the digit 
manipulation so the call will succeed

when i went to locations and reduced the BW to 20 and resynched the BW

when i was calling br2 phone from br1 or hq. i was getting the AA for CUE and 
the called number on the pri was the external phone number mask assigned to the 
CTI Route Point
and on the display on br1/hq phone was saying not enough bw, rerouting

however when i went ahead and removed the call forward settings on BR2 phone

and when I was trying to call br2 phone by dialing the internal extension ... i 
was getting busy no messages on the phones


could you please help me understand why ?

thank you




*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] TCS Capability Exchange

2011-04-17 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

I'm working on CUBE, and I'm facing the TCS issue, I know that I have to 
uncheck wait for Far End H.245 Terminal Capability Set, but I'm looking how 
to identify this in the SDL traces.
Anyone know the exact word who describe the issue in the logs?

Thanks a lot

Naoufal


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Class Based Shaping

2011-04-16 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

I'm working on QoS Vol2 lab7, when I assigned the class to serial interface I 
got the below message:

HQ-RTR(config)#interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point
HQ-RTR(config-subif)#bandw
HQ-RTR(config-subif)#bandwidth 384
HQ-RTR(config-subif)# frame-relay interface-dlci 201
HQ-RTR(config-fr-dlci)#cla
HQ-RTR(config-fr-dlci)#class BR1
I/f  shape  class SIG requested bandwidth 18 (kbps), available only 12 (kbps)
I/f  shape  class SIG requested bandwidth 18 (kbps), available only 12 (kbps)

Below my QoS Config

class-map match-any RTP
match protocol rtp audio
 match protocol rtcp
class-map match-any SIG
match protocol skinny
match protocol h323
match protocol mgcp
match protocol sip
match protocol rsvp
!
!
policy-map WAN-EDGE
class RTP
   compress header ip rtp
  priority 24
class SIG
  bandwidth 18
policy-map Shape-BR1
class class-default
  shape average 36480 3648 0
  service-policy WAN-EDGE
!
map-class frame-relay BR1
frame-relay fragment 480
service-policy output Shape-BR1


Any Ideas?

Thanks

NAOUFAL



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice mail in CUPS

2011-04-16 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Not the CUCM password you have tu use the unity connection user web password

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Erwan Erwan
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 8:10 AM
To: Roger Carpio; Vik Malhi
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice mail in CUPS

hmm yes i tried this too: br1ph1   , password :cisco  , from UCM End User

--- On Sun, 4/17/11, Vik Malhi 
vma...@ipexpert.commailto:vma...@ipexpert.com wrote:

From: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.commailto:vma...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice mail in CUPS
To: Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.commailto:roger.car...@gmail.com
Cc: Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.commailto:e_er...@yahoo.com, 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Received: Sunday, April 17, 2011, 11:39 AM
Also remember it is not the voicemail password but rather the web application 
password that the CUPC will be using.


--
Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: 
vma...@ipexpert.comhttp://ca.mc1205.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vma...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Live Assistance, Please visit: 
www.ipexpert.com/chathttp://www.ipexpert.com/chat
http://www.ipexpert.com/chat

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio 
Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, 
Voice, Wireless, Security  Service Provider) certification(s) with training 
locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be 
sure to visit our online communities at 
www.ipexpert.com/communitieshttp://www.ipexpert.com/communities 
http://www.ipexpert.com/communities  and our public website at 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/ http://www.ipexpert.com/


On Apr 16, 2011, at 18:53, Roger Carpio 
roger.car...@gmail.comhttp://ca.mc1205.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=roger.car...@gmail.com
 wrote:
Before adding the user to UC; did you configure the Allow Users to Access 
Voice Mail Using an IMAP Client option in COS?
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Erwan Erwan 
e_er...@yahoo.comhttp://ca.mc1205.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=e_er...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
hi all,

can someone advice, what i miss in CUPS voicemail.

I kept geeting this error  from Show Server Health  in CUPC client

Failed to Connect - Invalid Credentials or Account Locked

I verified user name and password for voicemail is working in Phone itself

tks


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Not working

2011-04-13 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,

Add

service aa flash:app-b-acd-aa-3.0.0.2.tcl
  param number-of-hunt-grps 3

and correct the number of hunt group in ACD service (I guess you have 3 not 4)

Hope this will help

Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of mgscip
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 5:36 PM
To: ccie
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Not working


Hi ,



We tested with B-ACD in CME . whenever we dial the pilot number call disconnect.



Config



application
service aa flash:app-b-acd-aa-3.0.0.2.tcl
  paramspace english index 1
  param menu-timeout 1
  param dial-by-extension-option 1
  param handoff-string aa
  paramspace english language en
  param max-time-vm-retry 2
  param aa-pilot 7500
  paramspace english location flash:
  param second-greeting-time 1
  param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au
  paramspace english prefix en
  param service-name ACD

service ACD flash:app-b-acd-3.0.0.2.tcl
  paramspace english language en
  paramspace english index 0
  param aa-hunt1 7001
  param aa-hunt2 7002
  param number-of-hunt-grps 4
  param aa-hunt3 7003



Dial-peer



dial-peer voice 7500 voip
service aa
destination-pattern 7500
session target ipv4:192.168.1.100
incoming called-number 7500
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
codec g711ulaw



I have verified that all the audio files uploade in the flash.



MoH working for IP Phones.



When i check show call application session , it tries to establish session but 
it end session immediately




*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX scripting (Unity connection for Holiday query)

2011-04-11 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

I'm working on a UCCX script (Vol2 Lab7) that permit to check the holiday in a 
xml file and then decides either to terminate or accept the call.
I'm searching if there is another way to use Unity Connection for the holiday 
query instead of docs.

Any ideas?

Thanks a lot
Naoufal


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper + CUBE (WB2 Lab1 4.2)

2011-04-10 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,

You have to register the br2 with the UCME zone not the VIA zone.

Remove h323-gateway voip id VIA ipaddr 172.1.254.1 1719

 and replace it with

h323-gateway voip id UCME ipaddr 172.1.254.1 1719

Thanks
Naoufal

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Goh
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 9:43 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper + CUBE (WB2 Lab1 4.2)

Hi Guys,

I'm trying to get the solutions for question 4.2 to work, but apparently I'm 
missing something and hope someone can help.
I've search thru the list but doesn't really found a solution work for my case.

The issue I've encounter are when HQ phone 5001 calling BR2 phone 3003, 3003 
ring, but when i tried to answered, the call drop.
I know it might be related to codec issue, but I've my HQ-RTR configured with 
Xcoder which it is up and active but the call still failing. I also did have 
the trunk in cucm Wait for Far End
H.245 Terminal Capability Set unchecked.

once things I notice is that, my call doesn't seems get re-originated on the 
cube router to BR2 router, what I see during ringing state my show gatekeeper 
endpoint show the call is directly from the CUCM to BR2 It is only 2 call legs 
instead of 4 (see below).

hm, what have I missed?

Some Info:
HQ Router (R1)

interface Loopback0
 ip address 172.1.254.1 255.255.255.255
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id VIA ipaddr 172.1.254.1 1719  h323-gateway voip h323-id R1 
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.1.254.1

gatekeeper
 zone local UCM 172.1.254.1
 zone local UCME outvia VIA
 zone local VIA
 zone prefix UCME 3...
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 no shutdown

dial-peer voice 30 voip
 destination-pattern 3...
 session target ras
 codec g711ulaw
!
dial-peer voice 31 voip
 incoming called-number 3...

Total number of active calls = 1.
 GATEKEEPER CALL INFO
 
LocalCallIDAge(secs)   BW
511-32797  6   16(Kbps)
 Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
   src EP: gk_trunk_25001
   CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
   172.1.10.20 38233 172.1.10.20 32795
 Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
   dst EP: R33003
   CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
   172.3.254.1 1720  172.3.254.1 49395

GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION

CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port  Zone Name TypeFlags
--- - --- - - -
172.1.10.10 47142 172.1.10.10 32838 UCM   VOIP-GW
H323-ID: gk_trunk_1
Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
172.1.10.20 38233 172.1.10.20 32795 UCM   VOIP-GW
H323-ID: gk_trunk_2
Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
172.1.254.1 1720  172.1.254.2 56974 VIA   H323-GW
H323-ID: R1
Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
172.3.254.1 1720  172.3.254.1 49395 VIA   H323-GW
H323-ID: R3
Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0 Total number of active 
registrations = 4

R1(config-if)#do sh gatek gw
GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE
=
Prefix: 1#*(Default gateway-technology)
  Zone UCM master gateway list:
172.1.10.20:38233 gk_trunk_2
172.1.10.10:47142 gk_trunk_1
  Zone VIA master gateway list:
172.3.254.1:1720 R3
172.1.254.2:1720 R1

BR2 Router (R2)

interface Loopback0
 ip address 172.3.254.1 255.255.255.255
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id VIA ipaddr 172.1.254.1 1719 
 h323-gateway voip h323-id R3  
h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#  
h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.3.254.1

dial-peer voice 10 voip
 incoming called-number 3...
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 codec g711ulaw
!

CUCM Trunk
the trunk was assign a separate DP with a region that using G729 when calling 
HQ and BR2.



Regards,
Alex
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script (Redirect call based on the calling number)

2011-04-10 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
The + symbol is a string so it can be match. My script is working if I set the 
condition like If   Calling Number == “+3434141891” then redirect call to 
5001
But I’m looking for a way to reroute all calls coming from area +34 to 5001

Naoufal

From: bkvalent...@gmail.com [mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 4:40 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script (Redirect call based on the calling 
number)

I believe uccx does not understand the + symbol.

- Reply message -
From: Naoufal Kerboute naou...@mhdinfotech.com
Date: Sun, Apr 10, 2011 7:21 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script (Redirect call based on the calling 
number)
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Dear gents,

I'm working on UCCX section and I'm trying to reroute some calls coming from 
Spain (+34) to a specific extension. I've setup the script and it's working 
only if I set the calling number variable to full Spain PSTN number, but let 
take the case for many number from Spain.
How can I reroute calls coming from spain to a specific extension (I don't want 
to much the full muber, I want to much only calling number start with +34)

Any ideas?

Thanks a lot
Naoufal



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*




*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper + CUBE (WB2 Lab1 4.2)

2011-04-10 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,

For supplementary you have to setup an MTP,
For the call drop try to enable Inbound Fast Start

Naoufal

-Original Message-
From: Alex Goh [mailto:ncsalex@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 6:29 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper + CUBE (WB2 Lab1 4.2)

Hi All,

Thanks very much for the reply. The issue is due to my mistake that registering 
BR2 to wrong zone.

Now the CUCM Call to BR2 is working fine except the supplementary service e.g 
hold, Moh doesn't work, do I need MTP for this?

also, calling from BR2 Sip phone to CUCM is failling, phone ring, but when 
answered, it dropped.
my Sip phone is using G729 codec, do I still need MTP on BR2 in this case?

Thanks

Regards,
Alex

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Naoufal Kerboute naou...@mhdinfotech.com 
wrote:
 Hi,

 You have to register the br2 with the UCME zone not the VIA zone.

 Remove h323-gateway voip id VIA ipaddr 172.1.254.1 1719

  and replace it with

 h323-gateway voip id UCME ipaddr 172.1.254.1 1719

 Thanks
 Naoufal

 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Alex Goh
 Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 9:43 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper + CUBE (WB2 Lab1 4.2)

 Hi Guys,

 I'm trying to get the solutions for question 4.2 to work, but apparently I'm 
 missing something and hope someone can help.
 I've search thru the list but doesn't really found a solution work for my 
 case.

 The issue I've encounter are when HQ phone 5001 calling BR2 phone 3003, 3003 
 ring, but when i tried to answered, the call drop.
 I know it might be related to codec issue, but I've my HQ-RTR 
 configured with Xcoder which it is up and active but the call still 
 failing. I also did have the trunk in cucm Wait for Far End
 H.245 Terminal Capability Set unchecked.

 once things I notice is that, my call doesn't seems get re-originated on the 
 cube router to BR2 router, what I see during ringing state my show 
 gatekeeper endpoint show the call is directly from the CUCM to BR2 It is 
 only 2 call legs instead of 4 (see below).

 hm, what have I missed?

 Some Info:
 HQ Router (R1)

 interface Loopback0
  ip address 172.1.254.1 255.255.255.255
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id VIA ipaddr 172.1.254.1 1719  h323-gateway voip 
 h323-id R1  h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.1.254.1

 gatekeeper
  zone local UCM 172.1.254.1
  zone local UCME outvia VIA
  zone local VIA
  zone prefix UCME 3...
  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
  no shutdown

 dial-peer voice 30 voip
  destination-pattern 3...
  session target ras
  codec g711ulaw
 !
 dial-peer voice 31 voip
  incoming called-number 3...

 Total number of active calls = 1.
                         GATEKEEPER CALL INFO
                          LocalCallID                      
   
 Age(secs)   BW
 511-32797                          6           16(Kbps)
  Endpt(s): Alias                 E.164Addr
   src EP: gk_trunk_2            5001
           CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
           172.1.10.20     38233 172.1.10.20     32795
  Endpt(s): Alias                 E.164Addr
   dst EP: R3                    3003
           CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
           172.3.254.1     1720  172.3.254.1     49395

                    GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION
                     CallSignalAddr  
 Port  RASSignalAddr   Port  Zone Name         Type    Flags
 --- - --- - -             
 -
 172.1.10.10     47142 172.1.10.10     32838 UCM               VOIP-GW
    H323-ID: gk_trunk_1
    Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
 172.1.10.20     38233 172.1.10.20     32795 UCM               VOIP-GW
    H323-ID: gk_trunk_2
    Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
 172.1.254.1     1720  172.1.254.2     56974 VIA               H323-GW
    H323-ID: R1
    Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
 172.3.254.1     1720  172.3.254.1     49395 VIA               H323-GW
    H323-ID: R3
    Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0 Total number of active 
 registrations = 4

 R1(config-if)#do sh gatek gw
 GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE
 =
 Prefix: 1#*    (Default gateway-technology)
  Zone UCM master gateway list:
    172.1.10.20:38233 gk_trunk_2
    172.1.10.10:47142 gk_trunk_1
  Zone VIA master gateway list:
    172.3.254.1:1720 R3
    172.1.254.2:1720 R1

 BR2 Router (R2)

 interface Loopback0
  ip address 172.3.254.1 255.255.255.255
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id VIA ipaddr 172.1.254.1 1719
  h323-gateway voip h323-id R3
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.3.254.1

 dial-peer voice 10 voip
  incoming called-number 3...
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
  codec g711ulaw
 !

 CUCM Trunk
 the trunk

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script (Redirect call based on the calling number)

2011-04-10 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Thanks Roger.
I was looking for the function StartsWith(+34).
You are a great man :D

From: Rogers Ochieng [mailto:rogersochi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 7:57 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: bkvalent...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script (Redirect call based on the calling 
number)

Looks similar to requirement of IPExpert Workbook 1 Lab 12A - 12.2
On 10 April 2011 15:40, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
The + symbol is a string so it can be match. My script is working if I set the 
condition like If   Calling Number == +3434141891 then redirect call to 
5001
But I'm looking for a way to reroute all calls coming from area +34 to 5001

Naoufal

From: bkvalent...@gmail.commailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com 
[mailto:bkvalent...@gmail.commailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 4:40 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script (Redirect call based on the calling 
number)

I believe uccx does not understand the + symbol.

- Reply message -
From: Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com
Date: Sun, Apr 10, 2011 7:21 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script (Redirect call based on the calling 
number)
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Dear gents,

I'm working on UCCX section and I'm trying to reroute some calls coming from 
Spain (+34) to a specific extension. I've setup the script and it's working 
only if I set the calling number variable to full Spain PSTN number, but let 
take the case for many number from Spain.
How can I reroute calls coming from spain to a specific extension (I don't want 
to much the full muber, I want to much only calling number start with +34)

Any ideas?

Thanks a lot
Naoufal



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST mode with HSRP

2011-04-08 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,

Add the secondary address (which is your backup gw) in the telephony-services.

Rgds
Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Julien Krieger
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 8:17 PM
To: Glen Cobby; George Goglidze
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST mode with HSRP

Hi guys,

Thank you for your answers.

George, I am more looking for a backup solution at this tima than load 
balancing. For load balancing, I could still use 2 HRSP instances and use 2 DP 
with 2 HSRP vip. With it, i will have both solution.

Julien


2011/4/7 Glen Cobby 
g...@positivenetworks.co.ukmailto:g...@positivenetworks.co.uk
I do that on sites with two gateways and it works fine.

Thanks

Glen

On 7 Apr 2011, at 14:57, Julien Krieger 
krieger.jul...@gmail.commailto:krieger.jul...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi guys,

 I am running a few tests to clear thing up on SRST with HSRP.

 I have 1 remote site with 2 local gateways. Theses gateways must act as SRST 
 should my wan goes down.
 I would usually create 2 Device Pools with 1 of the 2 gateways as its SRST 
 reference.
 But what if I gateway go down?

 What I would like to see is if I could use an HSRP ip add as my SRST 
 reference into my 1 device pool.
 Do you think it would work?

 Julien
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Debug Gatekeeper trunk call - codec mismatch

2011-04-05 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
You can see the bandwidth requested in the debug

From: Rogers Ochieng [mailto:rogersochi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 10:02 AM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Debug Gatekeeper trunk call - codec mismatch

I ran debug gatekeeper call 10 but did know how to pick out the codec issue 
which i created by having PSTN phone on strict G711 while my CUCM trunk to HQ 
GK is on G729. Call rings then drop when i pickup, if i change the trunk or 
CUCM h225 trunk to use same codec it works. I need to pickout the error or the 
error code. I'll try out voice ccapi inout
On 5 April 2011 07:13, Naoufal Kerboute 
naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com wrote:
You can run:  debug gatekeeper call 10 or debug voice ccapi inout
NaoufaL

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
 On Behalf Of Rogers Ochieng
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 6:55 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Debug Gatekeeper trunk call - codec mismatch

Which debug output will show any codec mismatch? I know that i need to check 
for codec as one problem if a call between two endpoints get drop on answer. I 
need an expert level debug i can send to an ITSP and tell them, here's the 
mismatch.

*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 5 every location with SIP TRUNK

2011-04-04 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
I like you Jonny :)


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonny Mendas
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 11:00 AM
To: v.c...@yahoo.com; a...@ipcomconsult.com; jbr...@tsginc.biz; 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; gogli...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 5 every location with SIP TRUNK

Hi Guys,

I can see lot of guys are freshers out here!

Previously people pass the lab by making back to back attempts and when they 
attempt they remember the labs and get it then they make the solutions and 
attempt when there is no ipexpert,ine or 360

so lets say 3 attempts they fail they get all the lab and pass on 4th attempt 
less CCIE but more investment...
The same things real labs are giving u now...

So as smart work save yr 3 times attempt money and get it and make yrself pass

Even there are guys who cannot pass from real labs but CCIE is respectful and 
you need hard core knowledge for the same even on real labs.

But if you dont have that!!! then make 5 attempts get the lab and then pass but 
again u are doing the same thing ah ha... but with a stupid way!!!

I am sure now you guys got the answer

To reach till CCIE its default you require core knowledge there is no one in 
the world who just close yr eyes and attempt and make it pass  atleast not in 
VOICE

So now please do not speak like junk or freshers and update if you will get lab 
5 :)

Thankyou


Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 20:57:07 -0700
From: v.c...@yahoo.commailto:v.c...@yahoo.com
To: a...@ipcomconsult.commailto:a...@ipcomconsult.com; 
jbr...@tsginc.bizmailto:jbr...@tsginc.biz; 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
 gogli...@gmail.commailto:gogli...@gmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 5 every location with SIP TRUNK
I agree with Alex. In the exam they are doing a lot of bad things to prevent 
you from passing the exam not to measure the your skills.

 Regarding George message, I respect your message and I am not happy to hear 
what I said in my previous message about passing CCIE using real lab, yes I 
agree with you it is very bad to pass CCIE depending on real lab only. but for 
me I am considering real lab like other scenarios ( I will buy and  study it 
like when I am studying  IP Expert WB) for sure I will not just study the real 
lab and go to the exam, no I will prepare for the exam, I am going through the 
blue print topic by topic, I am reading to much in Cisco Press books. I have 
the complete solution of IP Expert I spent a lot of hours on racks and my home 
lab.

but at the end I am going to take a look on real lab. I need to pass. I can not 
see my company respect some guys more than me just because they are CCIE and I 
have more experience and knowledge.

Regards,


From: Alex a...@ipcomconsult.com
To: Justin Brady jbr...@tsginc.biz; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; 
George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com; Ccie Voice v.c...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Mon, April 4, 2011 6:32:54 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 5 every location with SIP TRUNK

Guys,
Most of the people on this list are trying to make way to their numbers without 
cheating.
I also failed a few times but never resorted to real labs.
However sometimes I
I feel that cisco is cheating on me.
Do u think R and S troubleshooting should be a part of Voice exam? Do u think 
that forcing u to use workaronds instead of normal tools available in real live 
adds any value to the certification? Don't u think that if cisco wants to test 
our troubleshoting skills they have to allocate some points and time for it but 
not brake something which u can possibly find only at the end of the exam when 
testing everything?
I didn't have any problems configuring anything they asked me to. I also 
managed to resolve all the tricks they prepared for me (except of one for 
which I spent hours to research and recreate but still dono how did they brake 
it). However these hidden things kill ur time and as the result u don't have 
enough to verify everything and lose points because of typo etc.
So, don't blame the guy much, he is just trying to cheat on cheater.
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

-Original Message-
From: Justin Brady jbr...@tsginc.bizmailto:jbr...@tsginc.biz
Sender: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 00:42:41
To: George Goglidzegogli...@gmail.commailto:gogli...@gmail.com; Ccie 
Voicev.c...@yahoo.commailto:v.c...@yahoo.com
Cc: 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 5 every location with SIP TRUNK


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP number of calls

2011-04-04 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
For RSVP always consider the worst casr scenario for the first call, meaning if 
you're using g729 you have to reserve 40k for the first call and for g711 
reserve 96k
Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of CCIE for Me
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 6:33 AM
To: voice boy; OSL Questions
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP number of calls

with g729 and rsvp always use 40k for the first call (worst case) + 24 each 
subsequent call.  You don't need to create an HQ location since it is already 
in hubnone (well, you can but you are making more work for yourself).  All 
other devices that have those locations will need to be account for too in your 
calculations.

From: voice boymailto:voice...@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 9:57 PM
To: OSL Questionsmailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP number of calls


Hi,

I have 2 doubts here ...


When I set RSVP between 2-sites to permit 2-G729 calls
It work with me first when i use 80 for rsvp bandwidth

but trying 40k for the first and from the second call 24k ,, it also work with 
me
So I built my calculations on this
so 2-calls = 64k ,, 3-calls = 88k ,, 4-calls = 112k and so one
or use 40k for first and second and each needed call ?




Also I'll create two locations 2-sites [HQ and another site]

Do i need to create 3rd location with no reservation with all other locations
and assign this location to GK,MMOH,CUC-ports,UCCX-ports  RPs that all these 
exist in HQ and may be affected if put in HQ location as phones ??

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Debug Gatekeeper trunk call - codec mismatch

2011-04-04 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
You can run:  debug gatekeeper call 10 or debug voice ccapi inout
NaoufaL

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rogers Ochieng
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 6:55 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Debug Gatekeeper trunk call - codec mismatch

Which debug output will show any codec mismatch? I know that i need to check 
for codec as one problem if a call between two endpoints get drop on answer. I 
need an expert level debug i can send to an ITSP and tell them, here's the 
mismatch.


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Gateway registration Issue

2011-04-03 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi gents,

Please I need your help for the below.
I'm always facing problem to get the MGCP gateway up, always the first time 
register with the serial interface instead of the bind interface (loopback or 
voice vlan int) that I specified in the config. I've tried to remove the isdn 
bind-l3 ccm-manager and put it again, no mgcp and mgcp but it doesn't help 
until I remove sometime the hole config and do it again and again, reset...

I'm missing something??

Thanks a lot.
Naoufal


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 5 released

2011-03-22 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Are you serious?
Why you mail is ccievoicelab5?

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccievoice
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:38 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 5 released


Guys,

Lab 5 released guys i have no words to say!!

It was my 9 attempt and again i got fucX

Just to inform there was lot of things which i got it never seen in life :)

SIP Trunk , AAR , MVA , CAC all changed

IPCC page was one full page, SIP trunk troubleshooting was full one page

I got so depressed that i left the lab like that

): ): ): ): ): ): ): ):

[http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/adstream_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle]http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?

*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE PASSE

2011-03-20 Thread Naoufal Kerboute




 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/



--
Naoufal Kerboute
Networks Service Manager
Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com, 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRF.12 - Recommendation: Set the CIR to 95 percent of the PVC contracted speed.

2011-03-17 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
I guess you can keep 960

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Friderich Claude
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:06 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRF.12 - Recommendation: Set the CIR to 95 percent 
of the PVC contracted speed.



Hello Guys,

If they ask us to configure 95 percent of the PVC with a bandwidth of 768k for 
example (FRF12)

What value should I put for the fragmentation size meaning best practice is 
10ms of fragmentation  960(100% of CIR) or 912(95% of CIR) ??

Regards

Claude



--

This email was Anti Virus checked.



Disclaimer



The information in this Internet e-mail is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this Internet 
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, 
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.



When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail 
are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in our governing terms of 
business.



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Looking for vouchers for sale

2011-03-07 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

Any vouchers for sale (only low price).

Thanks a lot
Naoufal


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Steffen Lehmann
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 4:26 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctorlabs vouchers for sale

Hi all,

i have 20 8h proctorlabs.com Lab vouchers to sell.
Please send my a mail directly, if you´re interested.


Do not need it anymore, got my number yesterday :-)

Kind regards

Steffen

CCIE#28124 (Voice)






___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA DISA NOT WORKING

2011-02-16 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Dear Gents,

I'm working on MVA scenario.
I've setup the scenario for MVA and SNR. SNR is working well. MVA is working 
partially, meaning when I call the MVA number the system asking me for the pin 
then 1 to make a call.
But when I pressed 1 and then the number # I heard only silence and then the 
call disconnected.

Any Idea?
Thanks a lot

NAOUFAL KERBOUTE
SERVICE MANAGER
[Description: MHD_infotech]
Post Box 880, Postal Code 112, Ruwi
Sultanate of Oman
Telephone

24 835 252, 24 834 848
24 834 400, 24 836 226





Mobile

9604 2593





E-Mail

naou...@mhdinfotech.commailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com

  Web  www.mhdinfotech.comhttp://www.mhdinfotech.com/
Working hours 7:30 AM to 5:00 PM



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


inline: image001.png___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] graded labs remote controle

2011-01-16 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Dear Wayne,

So now we can use Phoneview to control all phones lab?

Many Thanks,

Naoufal.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Wayne Lawson
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 1:55 AM
To: Wael Agina
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] graded labs remote controle

Wael,


 Phoneview @ www.unifiedfx.comhttp://www.unifiedfx.com will enable 
users to remotely manage phones. This questions comes at a good time as we are 
preparing to make an announcement regarding this - very soon.

Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244 (RS)
Founder, President  CEO - IPexpert, Inc., Proctor Labs, Inc.  Platinum 
Solutions Group, LLC.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.commailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.334.1564
eFax: +1.810.454.0244

::Message sent from iPhone

IPexpert  Proctor Labs are premier providers of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on 
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the 
Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Wireless, Security  Service Provider) certification(s) 
with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and 
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at 
www.ipexpert.com/communitieshttp://www.ipexpert.com/communities and our 
public website at www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com or 
www.proctorlabs.comhttp://www.proctorlabs.com.

CCIE-focused job community located at 
www.platinumplacementservices.comhttp://www.platinumplacementservices.com.

Connect @ www.WayneLawson.comhttp://www.WayneLawson.com.


On Jan 16, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Wael Agina 
waelag...@gmail.commailto:waelag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wayne,

   Do IPexpert going to have any phone remote control software , so we can 
fully utilize the proctorlabs and test all features ?
I am just asking if you have any future plan regarding this matter.

Many Thanks,
Wael Agina
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Wayne Lawson 
groupst...@ipexpert.commailto:groupst...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Um.

Are you aware of our own racks @ 
www.ProctorLabs.comhttp://www.ProctorLabs.com?

Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244 (RS)
Founder, President  CEO - IPexpert, Inc., Proctor Labs, Inc.  Platinum 
Solutions Group, LLC.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.commailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.334.1564
eFax: +1.810.454.0244

::Message sent from iPhone

IPexpert  Proctor Labs are premier providers of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on 
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the 
Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Wireless, Security  Service Provider) certification(s) 
with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and 
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at 
www.ipexpert.com/communitieshttp://www.ipexpert.com/communities and our 
public website at www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com or 
www.proctorlabs.comhttp://www.proctorlabs.com.

CCIE-focused job community located at 
www.platinumplacementservices.comhttp://www.platinumplacementservices.com.

Connect @ www.WayneLawson.comhttp://www.WayneLawson.com.


On Jan 16, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Joli-coeur Wouter 
jwou...@gmail.commailto:jwou...@gmail.com wrote:
graded labs but i am starting to fell sorry about that Any other good labs out 
there?
3 days before exam and i need something very reliable.
Graded lab isvery slow and some thing just don't work today
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Wayne Lawson 
groupst...@ipexpert.commailto:groupst...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Are you using Graded Labs or Proctor Labs? If you're using Graded Labs - 
contact their support people.
Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244 (RS)
Founder, President  CEO - IPexpert, Inc., Proctor Labs, Inc.  Platinum 
Solutions Group, LLC.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.commailto:wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.334.1564
eFax: +1.810.454.0244

::Message sent from iPhone

IPexpert  Proctor Labs are premier providers of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on 
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the 
Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Wireless, Security  Service Provider) certification(s) 
with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and 
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at 
www.ipexpert.com/communitieshttp://www.ipexpert.com/communities and our 
public website at www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com or 
www.proctorlabs.comhttp://www.proctorlabs.com.

CCIE-focused job community located at 
www.platinumplacementservices.comhttp://www.platinumplacementservices.com.

Connect @ www.WayneLawson.comhttp://www.WayneLawson.com.


On Jan 16, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Joli-coeur Wouter 
jwou...@gmail.commailto:jwou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,

I am using gradedlabs to study, however is have problems using phone remote 
software to connect to CME maneged phones
Wondering if anybody here was able to succesfully connect to CME manged phones 
using phone remote

Don't understand what i am doing wrong i can 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctorlabs vpn connection with ASA 5505

2011-01-09 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi guys,

It is possible to use vpn client on the PC and use hardware phones?


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Julien Krieger
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 12:55 PM
To: Carl Baccus
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctorlabs vpn connection with ASA 5505

Hi Carl,

I had the same wish to use my ASA 5505 to connect to protorlab's vracks but 
proctorlab's support told me that they were not supporting it anymore as it 
wasn't working corretly.
They told me to use one of the other available options.

Julien
2011/1/9 Carl Baccus cjbac...@gmail.commailto:cjbac...@gmail.com
I am currently working on connecting up my ASA at home for the
proctorlabs voice vRack.
I have read the article posted by Mark Snow, here on this forum:
http://www.onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2009-September/010787.html
and online elsewhere.  I cannot find any actual config for the
remaining ASA configuration, and even though I am able to establish a
VPN connection to the Vrack, I cannot seem to route correctly to the
10.10.0.0/16http://10.10.0.0/16 address space contains the voice components.
This is my configuration so far:

ASA Version 7.2(2)
!
hostname CarlASA
domain-name .net
enable password X
names
!
interface Vlan1
 nameif inside
 security-level 100
 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan2
 nameif outside
 security-level 0
 ip address dhcp
!
interface Ethernet0/0
 switchport access vlan 2
!
interface Ethernet0/1
!
interface Ethernet0/2
!
interface Ethernet0/3
!
interface Ethernet0/4
!
interface Ethernet0/5
!
interface Ethernet0/6
!
interface Ethernet0/7
!
passwd 
ftp mode passive
dns server-group DefaultDNS
 domain-name X.net
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip any any log
access-list outside_access_in extended permit ip any any log
access-list outside_access_out extended permit ip any any log
access-list inside_access_out extended permit ip any any log
pager lines 24
logging enable
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
asdm image disk0:/asdm-522.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
access-group inside_access_in in interface inside
access-group inside_access_out out interface inside
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
access-group outside_access_out out interface outside
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.3.1 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute
username X password 
aaa authentication ssh console LOCAL
http server enable
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto isakmp policy 65535
 authentication pre-share
 encryption 3des
 hash sha
 group 2
 lifetime 86400
telnet timeout 5
ssh 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside
ssh timeout 60
console timeout 0
dhcpd address 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.20 inside
dhcpd dns 192.168.1.1 interface inside
dhcpd option 3 ip 192.168.1.1 interface inside
dhcpd option 150 ip 10.10.210.10 10.10.210.11 interface inside
dhcpd enable inside
!
vpnclient server 74.126.20.247
vpnclient mode network-extension-mode
vpnclient vpngroup vpodgroup password 
vpnclient username  password 
vpnclient ipsec-over-tcp port 80
vpnclient enable
!
class-map inspection_default
 match default-inspection-traffic
!
!
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
 parameters
  message-length maximum 512
policy-map global_policy
 class inspection_default
  inspect dns preset_dns_map
  inspect ftp
  inspect h323 h225
  inspect h323 ras
  inspect netbios
  inspect rsh
  inspect rtsp
  inspect skinny
  inspect esmtp
  inspect sqlnet
  inspect sunrpc
  inspect tftp
  inspect sip
  inspect xdmcp
!
service-policy global_policy global
prompt hostname context


I cannot seem to get any kind of route to the inside of the voice vRack though.
I am not great at security or switching and routing, any help with
this would be great.  I will post a full tutorial with pictures once I
get it figured out for all others to use!
Thanks in advance!

--Carl
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com



*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctorlabs vpn connection with ASA 5505

2011-01-09 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Is there any other option?
I have internet over 3G USB dongle, can I use another router for that other 
than cisco?

-Original Message-
From: dew.s...@gmail.com [mailto:dew.s...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 3:19 PM
To: Julien Krieger; Carl Baccus; Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctorlabs vpn connection with ASA 5505

Nope. At least you need a cisco router to make a vpn connection in order to 
support hardware phones.
--
Dew Swen / sent from mobile device
CCVP, CCDP, CCNP-Original Message-
From: Naoufal Kerboute
Sent:  09/01/2011, 12:02 
To: Julien Krieger; Carl Baccus
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctorlabs vpn connection with ASA 5505


Hi guys,

It is possible to use vpn client on the PC and use hardware phones?


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Julien Krieger
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 12:55 PM
To: Carl Baccus
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctorlabs vpn connection with ASA 5505

Hi Carl,

I had the same wish to use my ASA 5505 to connect to protorlab's vracks but 
proctorlab's support told me that they were not supporting it anymore as it 
wasn't working corretly.
They told me to use one of the other available options.

Julien
2011/1/9 Carl Baccus cjbac...@gmail.commailto:cjbac...@gmail.com
I am currently working on connecting up my ASA at home for the
proctorlabs voice vRack.
I have read the article posted by Mark Snow, here on this forum:
http://www.onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2009-September/010787.html
and online elsewhere.  I cannot find any actual config for the
remaining ASA configuration, and even though I am able to establish a
VPN connection to the Vrack, I cannot seem to route correctly to the
10.10.0.0/16http://10.10.0.0/16 address space contains the voice components.
This is my configuration so far:

ASA Version 7.2(2)
!
hostname CarlASA
domain-name .net
enable password X
names
!
interface Vlan1
 nameif inside
 security-level 100
 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan2
 nameif outside
 security-level 0
 ip address dhcp
!
interface Ethernet0/0
 switchport access vlan 2
!
interface Ethernet0/1
!
interface Ethernet0/2
!
interface Ethernet0/3
!
interface Ethernet0/4
!
interface Ethernet0/5
!
interface Ethernet0/6
!
interface Ethernet0/7
!
passwd 
ftp mode passive
dns server-group DefaultDNS
 domain-name X.net
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip any any log
access-list outside_access_in extended permit ip any any log
access-list outside_access_out extended permit ip any any log
access-list inside_access_out extended permit ip any any log
pager lines 24
logging enable
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
asdm image disk0:/asdm-522.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
access-group inside_access_in in interface inside
access-group inside_access_out out interface inside
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
access-group outside_access_out out interface outside
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.3.1 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute
username X password 
aaa authentication ssh console LOCAL
http server enable
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto isakmp policy 65535
 authentication pre-share
 encryption 3des
 hash sha
 group 2
 lifetime 86400
telnet timeout 5
ssh 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside
ssh timeout 60
console timeout 0
dhcpd address 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.20 inside
dhcpd dns 192.168.1.1 interface inside
dhcpd option 3 ip 192.168.1.1 interface inside
dhcpd option 150 ip 10.10.210.10 10.10.210.11 interface inside
dhcpd enable inside
!
vpnclient server 74.126.20.247
vpnclient mode network-extension-mode
vpnclient vpngroup vpodgroup password 
vpnclient username  password 
vpnclient ipsec-over-tcp port 80
vpnclient enable
!
class-map inspection_default
 match default-inspection-traffic
!
!
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
 parameters
  message-length maximum 512
policy-map global_policy
 class inspection_default
  inspect dns preset_dns_map
  inspect ftp
  inspect h323 h225
  inspect h323 ras
  inspect netbios
  inspect rsh
  inspect rtsp
  inspect skinny
  inspect esmtp
  inspect sqlnet
  inspect sunrpc
  inspect tftp
  inspect sip
  inspect xdmcp
!
service-policy global_policy global
prompt hostname context


I cannot seem to get any kind of route to the inside of the voice vRack though.
I am not great at security

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper trunk registration (SUB)

2011-01-09 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,

I had the same problem because of the replication. Try to reset your 
replication.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of manishankar pandey
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 6:58 AM
To: Joli-coeur Wouter; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; bkvalent...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper trunk registration (SUB)

Try Changing the CCM Group listing nd make the Sub the 1st in the listing or 
priority and see whether SUB trunk is getting registered??

Thanks
M

--- On Mon, 1/10/11, bkvalent...@gmail.commailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com 
bkvalent...@gmail.commailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com wrote:

From: bkvalent...@gmail.commailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com 
bkvalent...@gmail.commailto:bkvalent...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper trunk registration (SUB)
To: Joli-coeur Wouter jwou...@gmail.commailto:jwou...@gmail.com, 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 5:40 AM
Could be a replication problem.  Make sue the ccm cluster is in sync.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

- Reply message -
From: Joli-coeur Wouter jwou...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 5:52 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper trunk registration (SUB)
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Thanks for the info
I have a sub configured for the correct CM group and the device pool has the
correct CM group and the trunk is in the correct device pool.

I think it might be a vmware  problem or database problem?
i just want to be sure that normally both trunks should show up if they are
in the correct device group and the device group has the correct CM group.

Regards,
Joli-coeur Wouter

On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Miron Kobelski 
findko...@gmail.commailto:findko...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 It seems you don't have Sub in CM Group configured for your trunk. Remember
 to restart it later.

 regards
 kobel

   On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 22:39, Joli-coeur Wouter 
 jwou...@gmail.commailto:jwou...@gmail.comwrote:

   Hello,

 I am running into some problems with cucm/gatekeeper configuration.
 For some reason only the PUB trunk is being registered.

 Is the SUB trunk to register automatically or do i need to configure
 something for that to happen  ?

 interface Loopback0
  ip address 177.1.254.1 255.255.255.255
  ip pim dense-mode
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.1
 gatekeeper
  zone local GK cisco.com 177.1.254.1
  zone prefix GK 2*
  zone prefix GK 4*
  no shutdown
 !
 I created a gatekeeper in CUCM (pub) andi created a  H.225 Trunk
 (Gatekeeper Controlled trunk)
 I added the trunk name GK-Trunk in the Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk
 That Will Use Port 1720 service

 Am i missing something ? PUB/SUB are vmware.

 Thanks for your help


 GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION
 
 CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port  Zone Name Type
 Flags
 --- - --- - - 
 -
 *177.1.10.10 1720  177.1.10.10 32816 GKVOIP-GW
 *H323-ID: GK-Trunk_1
 Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
 177.1.254.2 1720  177.1.254.2 61105 GKH323-GW
 Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
 177.1.254.3 1720  177.1.254.3 61431 GKVOIP-GW
 H323-ID: CUCME
 E164-ID: 4001
 E164-ID: 4002
 E164-ID: 4003
 E164-ID: 4300
 E164-ID: 4301
 E164-ID: 4302
 Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
 Total number of active registrations = 3


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com





-Inline Attachment Follows-
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com




*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Huntgroup (No Fwd)

2011-01-05 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi Gents,

I'm working on Hunt group configuration on CUCM. I wanted the CallFwdNoAn and 
CallFwdBusy  settings shoud be honored for the user who forwarded the call 
instead of the Hunt pilot/
Below My config:

One Hunt Group
One Hunt List
One Hunt Pilot (5000) and I've checked Use Personal preferences for CallFwdNoAn 
and CallFwdBusy

The problem is whenever I receive a call on the hunt Pilot the same ring in 
circular fashion but the CallFwdNoAn and CallFwdBusy  doesn't happened even the 
forward settings has been set on the members of the hunt group. Simply I heard 
busy tone without forward.

Any Ideas?

Regards,

Naoufal


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

2011-01-01 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Have you tried what I told you?

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Hough, Earl
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 3:53 PM
To: John Nield; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

This scenario doesn't involve CUCM.  It was only two CME sites - BR2 and
BR1 using the HQ-RTR as a GK/CUBE routing and media termination resource.  


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of John Nield
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 5:28 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

On 1/01/2011 3:37 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:
 [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

Hi

sounds like you br1 xcoders is not being allocated to the call, therefore you 
have no MTP function and a world of hurt. this theory assumes you're HQ phones 
are ok.

to verify this run up rtmt and check the number of xcoding resources being 
used, also check if the graph for unable to allocate resources.

i assume your br1 MRLG contains a hardware xcoder that would be used for

this instance, a software MTP in my experience fails due to the g729 codec the 
br1 sites will be requesting.

good luck.

regards

john

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
_ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is intended 
solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to whom it is 
addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is not permitted 
unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by PC Mall, Inc. 
Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for the proper and complete 
transmission of the substance of this communication, nor for any delay in its 
receipt. 


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

2011-01-01 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
I sent an email, check below:

Voice service voip
H323
H225 connect-passthru
!

If doesn't work please try 
Voice service voip
H323
h225 start-h245 on-connect

Hope this will help. If not try to configure MTP.

Regards,
Naoufal,

-Original Message-
From: Hough, Earl [mailto:earl.ho...@pcmallservices.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 4:29 PM
To: Naoufal Kerboute
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

What am I suppose to try?  You're suggestions involve CUCM, which this scenario 
isn't using.  When I get a chance later today, I will try throwing a hardware 
transcoder on BR1.  


-Original Message-
From: Naoufal Kerboute [mailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 7:13 AM
To: Hough, Earl
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

Have you tried what I told you?

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Hough, Earl
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 3:53 PM
To: John Nield; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

This scenario doesn't involve CUCM.  It was only two CME sites - BR2 and
BR1 using the HQ-RTR as a GK/CUBE routing and media termination resource.  


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of John Nield
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 5:28 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

On 1/01/2011 3:37 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:
 [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

Hi

sounds like you br1 xcoders is not being allocated to the call, therefore you 
have no MTP function and a world of hurt. this theory assumes you're HQ phones 
are ok.

to verify this run up rtmt and check the number of xcoding resources being 
used, also check if the graph for unable to allocate resources.

i assume your br1 MRLG contains a hardware xcoder that would be used for

this instance, a software MTP in my experience fails due to the g729 codec the 
br1 sites will be requesting.

good luck.

regards

john

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
_ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is intended 
solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to whom it is 
addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is not permitted 
unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by PC Mall, Inc. 
Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for the proper and complete 
transmission of the substance of this communication, nor for any delay in its 
receipt. 


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com




*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.
*
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the message and any attachments from your system. *


*




_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is intended 
solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to whom it is 
addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is not permitted 
unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by PC Mall, Inc. 
Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for the proper and complete 
transmission of the substance of this communication, nor for any delay in its 
receipt

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

2010-12-31 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Uncheck Wait for Far End H.245 Terminal Capability Set on the GK trunk on CUCM.

Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Hough, Earl
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 6:04 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

Everyone,

Been struggling with a scenario which seems to be rock-solid for SCCP 
endpoints.  The topology I'm working with is as follows:


BR2 (UCME 7.0)  G.729r8--  HQ (GK/CUBE)  --G.711ulaw--  
BR2 (UCME 7.0)


What I've been trying to do is to connect the two remote branches as H323 
gateways utilizing the GK/CUBE resources of the HQ router to provide GK address 
resolution and media termination.  I have no problems getting this to work 
using viazone processing in both directions when using exclusively SCCP 
endpoints.  What I have a problem with is SIP endpoints on BR2 being able to 
call SCCP endpoints at BR1.  The SIP endpoints at BR2 will initiate a call to a 
SCCP phone at BR1 and the BR1 phone will ring, but after the call is answered 
on the BR1 side, the BR2 side continues to ring out and never completes the 
call.  If I hang up the call from the BR1 side both sides disconnect, so it 
appears as though signaling is still working, just not the media path.  It also 
appears as though the H245 capability set is never completed when a SIP 
endpoint at BR2 initiates a call to BR1.  It does correctly work when an SCCP 
endpoint at BR2 initiates a call to BR1.

I've been scratching my head looking over debugs and traces for several hours 
here and though I'd throw it out to the group as to what anyone's thoughts 
would be as to why this isn't working correctly.  If I go straight through from 
BR2 to BR1 only using GK address resolution and not via-zone processing in that 
direction, the SIP endpoints are able to complete calls.

Any thoughts on this from group?


The relevant config portions are as follows:

HQ-RTR (GK/CUBE)
---
!
voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
!
!
voice-card 0
no dspfarm
dsp services dspfarm
!
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.0
h323-gateway voip interface
h323-gateway voip id CUBE ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ-RTR
h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.110.1
!
!
sccp local FastEthernet0/0.20
sccp ccm 10.10.200.3 identifier 1 version 6.0
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
associate ccm 1 priority 1
associate profile 1 register XCD-CME
!
dspfarm profile 1 transcode
 codec g711ulaw
codec g711alaw
codec g729ar8
codec g729abr8
codec g729r8
maximum sessions 4
associate application SCCP
!
!
dial-peer voice 3000 voip
incoming called-number 3...$
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
codec g711ulaw
no vad
!
dial-peer voice 4000 voip
destination-pattern 3...$
session target ras
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
no vad
!
dial-peer voice 3100 voip
incoming called-number 1...$
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
no vad
!
dial-peer voice 4100 voip
destination-pattern 1...$
session target ras
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
codec g711ulaw
no vad
!
!
gateway
 timer receive-rtp 1200
!
!
!
gatekeeper
zone local BR1 cisco.com 10.10.110.1 outvia CUBE
zone local CUBE cisco.com
zone local BR2 cisco.com outvia CUBE
zone prefix BR1 1...
zone prefix BR2 3...
gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
no shutdown
!
!
telephony-service
sdspfarm units 1
sdspfarm transcode sessions 4
sdspfarm tag 1 XCD-CME
load 7961 SCCP41.8-3-3S
load 7962 SCCP42.8-3-3S
load 7965 SCCP45.8-3-3S
max-ephones 10
max-dn 20 no-reg both
ip source-address 10.10.200.3 port 2000
max-conferences 8 gain -6
transfer-system full-consult
create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Dec 30 2010 07:46:37
!


BR1 (CME w/ SCCP-only endpoints)
-
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255
ip ospf network point-to-point
h323-gateway voip interface
h323-gateway voip id BR1 ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
h323-gateway voip h323-id BR1-RTR
h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.110.2
!
!
!
!
!
dial-peer voice 4000 voip
destination-pattern 3...$
session target ras
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
codec g711ulaw
no vad
!
dial-peer voice 3000 voip
incoming called-number 1...$
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
codec g711ulaw
no vad
!

BR2 (CME w/ SCCP and SIP endpoints)

!
!
voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
sip
  bind control source-interface vlan400
  bind media source-interface vlan400
  registrar server
!
!
voice register global
mode cme
source-address 10.10.202.1 port 5060
max-dn 20
max-pool 10
load 7971 SIP70.8-3-3S
load 7965 SIP45.8-3-3S
load 7961 SIP41.8-3-3S
authenticate register
timezone 42
time-format 24
date-format 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

2010-12-31 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Ah sorry I didn't get it. Please try

Voice service voip
H323
H225 connect-passthru
!

If doesn't work please try
Voice service voip
H323
h225 start-h245 on-connect

Hope this will help.

Regards,
Naoufal,

From: Hough, Earl [mailto:earl.ho...@pcmallservices.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 9:14 AM
To: Naoufal Kerboute; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

This scenario doesn't involve Callmanager.  It was two CME sites using HQ 
GK/CUBE to connect the two sites.


From: Naoufal Kerboute [mailto:naou...@mhdinfotech.com]
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:35 PM
To: Hough, Earl; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

Uncheck Wait for Far End H.245 Terminal Capability Set on the GK trunk on CUCM.

Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Hough, Earl
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 6:04 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP Endpoints with GK/CUBE Routing

Everyone,

Been struggling with a scenario which seems to be rock-solid for SCCP 
endpoints.  The topology I'm working with is as follows:


BR2 (UCME 7.0)  G.729r8--  HQ (GK/CUBE)  --G.711ulaw--  
BR2 (UCME 7.0)


What I've been trying to do is to connect the two remote branches as H323 
gateways utilizing the GK/CUBE resources of the HQ router to provide GK address 
resolution and media termination.  I have no problems getting this to work 
using viazone processing in both directions when using exclusively SCCP 
endpoints.  What I have a problem with is SIP endpoints on BR2 being able to 
call SCCP endpoints at BR1.  The SIP endpoints at BR2 will initiate a call to a 
SCCP phone at BR1 and the BR1 phone will ring, but after the call is answered 
on the BR1 side, the BR2 side continues to ring out and never completes the 
call.  If I hang up the call from the BR1 side both sides disconnect, so it 
appears as though signaling is still working, just not the media path.  It also 
appears as though the H245 capability set is never completed when a SIP 
endpoint at BR2 initiates a call to BR1.  It does correctly work when an SCCP 
endpoint at BR2 initiates a call to BR1.

I've been scratching my head looking over debugs and traces for several hours 
here and though I'd throw it out to the group as to what anyone's thoughts 
would be as to why this isn't working correctly.  If I go straight through from 
BR2 to BR1 only using GK address resolution and not via-zone processing in that 
direction, the SIP endpoints are able to complete calls.

Any thoughts on this from group?


The relevant config portions are as follows:

HQ-RTR (GK/CUBE)
---
!
voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
!
!
voice-card 0
no dspfarm
dsp services dspfarm
!
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.0
h323-gateway voip interface
h323-gateway voip id CUBE ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ-RTR
h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.110.1
!
!
sccp local FastEthernet0/0.20
sccp ccm 10.10.200.3 identifier 1 version 6.0
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
associate ccm 1 priority 1
associate profile 1 register XCD-CME
!
dspfarm profile 1 transcode
 codec g711ulaw
codec g711alaw
codec g729ar8
codec g729abr8
codec g729r8
maximum sessions 4
associate application SCCP
!
!
dial-peer voice 3000 voip
incoming called-number 3...$
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
codec g711ulaw
no vad
!
dial-peer voice 4000 voip
destination-pattern 3...$
session target ras
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
no vad
!
dial-peer voice 3100 voip
incoming called-number 1...$
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
no vad
!
dial-peer voice 4100 voip
destination-pattern 1...$
session target ras
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
codec g711ulaw
no vad
!
!
gateway
 timer receive-rtp 1200
!
!
!
gatekeeper
zone local BR1 cisco.com 10.10.110.1 outvia CUBE
zone local CUBE cisco.com
zone local BR2 cisco.com outvia CUBE
zone prefix BR1 1...
zone prefix BR2 3...
gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
no shutdown
!
!
telephony-service
sdspfarm units 1
sdspfarm transcode sessions 4
sdspfarm tag 1 XCD-CME
load 7961 SCCP41.8-3-3S
load 7962 SCCP42.8-3-3S
load 7965 SCCP45.8-3-3S
max-ephones 10
max-dn 20 no-reg both
ip source-address 10.10.200.3 port 2000
max-conferences 8 gain -6
transfer-system full-consult
create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Dec 30 2010 07:46:37
!


BR1 (CME w/ SCCP-only endpoints)
-
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255
ip ospf network point-to-point
h323-gateway voip interface
h323-gateway voip id BR1 ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
h323-gateway voip h323-id BR1-RTR
h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.110.2
!
!
!
!
!
dial-peer voice 4000 voip
destination-pattern 3...$
session target ras

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST (Incoming call not working)

2010-12-29 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi Gents,

I'm working on SRST LAB and I have a small problem. I'm unable to receive 
calls. Below the config:

ccm-manager switchback immediate
ccm-manager fallback-mgcp
ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10
ccm-manager mgcp
!
mgcp
mgcp call-agent  10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1
mgcp bind control source-interface Loopback0
mgcp bind media source-interface Loopback0
!
mgcp profile default
!
!
call-manager-fallback
max-conferences 8 gain -6
transfer-system full-consult
ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000
max-ephones 5
max-dn 30 dual-line
dialplan-pattern 1 617863 extension-length 4
transfer-pattern T
voicemail 4200
call-forward busy 4200
call-forward noan 4200 timeout 20
mwi relay
moh music-on-hold.au
time-format 24
date-format dd-mm-yy


Below the debug isdn q931:


BR1-SRST#
*Dec 29 13:29:54.580: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: RX - SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x00CA
Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
Standard = CCITT
Transfer Capability = Speech
Transfer Mode = Circuit
Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
Channel ID i = 0xA98381
Exclusive, Channel 1
Progress Ind i = 0x8583 - Origination address is non-ISDN
Calling Party Number i = 0x4180, '8632683'
Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)
Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '6178631002'
Plan:ISDN, Type:National
*Dec 29 13:29:54.612: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 
0x80CA
Channel ID i = 0xA98381
Exclusive, Channel 1
*Dec 29 13:29:54.616: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8  callref = 
0x80CA
Cause i = 0x829B - Destination out of order
*Dec 29 13:29:54.620: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 
0x00CA
*Dec 29 13:29:54.676: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: TX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8  callref 
= 0x80CA



Below the show dial-peer voice summary

BR1-SRST#sh dial-peer voice summary
dial-peer hunt 0
 ADPRE PASSOUT
TAGTYPE  MIN  OPER PREFIXDEST-PATTERN  FER THRU SESS-TARGETSTAT 
PORT
20037  pots  up   up 1001$  0   
50/0/1
20038  pots  up   up 1002$  0   
50/0/2
20039  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/3
20040  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/4
20041  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/5
20042  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/6
20043  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/7
20044  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/8
20045  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/9
20046  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/10
20047  pots  up   up 6178631001$0   
50/0/1
20048  pots  up   up 6178631002$0   
50/0/2


Show ephone registred:

BR1-SRST#sh ephone registered


ephone-1[0] Mac:0026.0BD6.CBB7 TCP socket:[2] activeLine:0 whisperLine:0 
REGISTERED in SCCP ver 17/12 max_streams=5
mediaActive:0 whisper_mediaActive:0 startMedia:0 offhook:0 ringing:0 reset:0 
reset_sent:0 paging 0 debug:0 caps:9
IP:142.102.65.79 25596 7965  keepalive 57 max_line 6 available_line 2
button 1: dn 1  number 1001  CM Fallback CH1   IDLE CH2   IDLE 
mwi
Preferred Codec: g711ulaw


ephone-2[1] Mac:081F.F363.B37D TCP socket:[1] activeLine:0 whisperLine:0 
REGISTERED in SCCP ver 17/12 max_streams=5
mediaActive:0 whisper_mediaActive:0 startMedia:0 offhook:0 ringing:0 reset:0 
reset_sent:0 paging 0 debug:0 caps:9
IP:142.102.65.78 14399 7945  keepalive 58 max_line 2 available_line 2
button 1: dn 2  number 1002  CM Fallback CH1   IDLE CH2   IDLE
Preferred Codec: g711ulaw



Please advise.

Thank you,

Naoufal


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST (Incoming call not working)

2010-12-29 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Please ignore my email. I forgot the redundant host (was online)  :S

From: Naoufal Kerboute
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 5:37 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: SRST (Incoming call not working)

Hi Gents,

I'm working on SRST LAB and I have a small problem. I'm unable to receive 
calls. Below the config:

ccm-manager switchback immediate
ccm-manager fallback-mgcp
ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10
ccm-manager mgcp
!
mgcp
mgcp call-agent  10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1
mgcp bind control source-interface Loopback0
mgcp bind media source-interface Loopback0
!
mgcp profile default
!
!
call-manager-fallback
max-conferences 8 gain -6
transfer-system full-consult
ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000
max-ephones 5
max-dn 30 dual-line
dialplan-pattern 1 617863 extension-length 4
transfer-pattern T
voicemail 4200
call-forward busy 4200
call-forward noan 4200 timeout 20
mwi relay
moh music-on-hold.au
time-format 24
date-format dd-mm-yy


Below the debug isdn q931:


BR1-SRST#
*Dec 29 13:29:54.580: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: RX - SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x00CA
Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
Standard = CCITT
Transfer Capability = Speech
Transfer Mode = Circuit
Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
Channel ID i = 0xA98381
Exclusive, Channel 1
Progress Ind i = 0x8583 - Origination address is non-ISDN
Calling Party Number i = 0x4180, '8632683'
Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)
Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '6178631002'
Plan:ISDN, Type:National
*Dec 29 13:29:54.612: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 
0x80CA
Channel ID i = 0xA98381
Exclusive, Channel 1
*Dec 29 13:29:54.616: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8  callref = 
0x80CA
Cause i = 0x829B - Destination out of order
*Dec 29 13:29:54.620: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 
0x00CA
*Dec 29 13:29:54.676: ISDN Se0/2/0:23 Q931: TX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8  callref 
= 0x80CA



Below the show dial-peer voice summary

BR1-SRST#sh dial-peer voice summary
dial-peer hunt 0
 ADPRE PASSOUT
TAGTYPE  MIN  OPER PREFIXDEST-PATTERN  FER THRU SESS-TARGETSTAT 
PORT
20037  pots  up   up 1001$  0   
50/0/1
20038  pots  up   up 1002$  0   
50/0/2
20039  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/3
20040  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/4
20041  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/5
20042  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/6
20043  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/7
20044  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/8
20045  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/9
20046  pots  up   down  0   
50/0/10
20047  pots  up   up 6178631001$0   
50/0/1
20048  pots  up   up 6178631002$0   
50/0/2


Show ephone registred:

BR1-SRST#sh ephone registered


ephone-1[0] Mac:0026.0BD6.CBB7 TCP socket:[2] activeLine:0 whisperLine:0 
REGISTERED in SCCP ver 17/12 max_streams=5
mediaActive:0 whisper_mediaActive:0 startMedia:0 offhook:0 ringing:0 reset:0 
reset_sent:0 paging 0 debug:0 caps:9
IP:142.102.65.79 25596 7965  keepalive 57 max_line 6 available_line 2
button 1: dn 1  number 1001  CM Fallback CH1   IDLE CH2   IDLE 
mwi
Preferred Codec: g711ulaw


ephone-2[1] Mac:081F.F363.B37D TCP socket:[1] activeLine:0 whisperLine:0 
REGISTERED in SCCP ver 17/12 max_streams=5
mediaActive:0 whisper_mediaActive:0 startMedia:0 offhook:0 ringing:0 reset:0 
reset_sent:0 paging 0 debug:0 caps:9
IP:142.102.65.78 14399 7945  keepalive 58 max_line 2 available_line 2
button 1: dn 2  number 1002  CM Fallback CH1   IDLE CH2   IDLE
Preferred Codec: g711ulaw



Please advise.

Thank you,

Naoufal


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] show gatekeeper gw

2010-12-29 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Check the device pool assigned to the trunk. You shoud have a device pool that 
contain the cucm group with sub first then pub.

Naoufal

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of study2b ccie
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 6:50 AM
To: OSL
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] show gatekeeper gw

Hello experts,

when entering sh gatek gw I have:

GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE
=
Prefix: 34*
  Zone GK master gateway list:
10.10.202.1:1720http://10.10.202.1:1720 CUCME

Prefix: 1*
  Zone GK master gateway list:
10.10.210.10:1720http://10.10.210.10:1720 GK-Trunk_1
10.10.210.11:1720http://10.10.210.11:1720 GK-Trunk_2


I followed solution to the dot, and I still did not have

HQ-RTR#sh gatek gw
GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE
=
Prefix: 34*
  Zone GK master gateway list:
10.10.202.1:1720http://10.10.202.1:1720 CUCME

Prefix: 1*
  Zone GK master gateway list:
10.10.210.10:1720http://10.10.210.10:1720 GK-Trunk_2
10.10.210.11:1720http://10.10.210.11:1720 GK-Trunk_1

It would show GK-Trunk_2 on top every time I restart the trunk, but it would 
become GK-Trunk_1 on top soon after.
How do you guys do it to keep GK-Trunk_2 on the top constantly?

Thank you in advance.


*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] TEST

2010-12-25 Thread Naoufal Kerboute




*
* This Communication is Private  Confidential. This message and any 
attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential 
and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC.  *
* It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to 
read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or *
* use this message  any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
message and any attachments from your system. *
*


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : Lab 5 Volume 2 LLQ sizing and RSVP CAC

2010-06-27 Thread naoufal kerboute
Hi,

I have a question, why proctor on lab 3 Vol 2 with MLP LFI + LLQ +FRST take 
into account the RSVP 1st call in the PQ? (mentioned in the question)

Regards
Naoufal

De : ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] de la part de kobel 
[findko...@gmail.com]
Date d'envoi : dimanche 27 juin 2010 17:12
À : Daniel Berlinski
Cc : osl osl
Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 5 Volume 2 LLQ sizing and RSVP CAC

Hi,

When calculating bandwidth needed for PQ, I wouldn't take into account the 
value used for initial call by RSVP. It's never actually used, it's only a 
worst case scenario.

voice packets are small and are never fragmented by FRF.12. that's why 
additional 4B in header are not needed.


On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Daniel Berlinski 
dberlin...@gmail.commailto:dberlin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list

Volume 2 lab 5 has a scenario asking us to allow for 4 concurrent g729 calls 
over Frame FRF.12 LFI using RSVP for CAC.
Proctor Guide has calculated the size of the priority queue without taking into 
account that first call prior to capabilities exchange that RSVP negotiates at 
40Kbps. In addition Proctor Guide has used Frame Relay payload of 4 Bytes 
instead of 8 Bytes for FR with LFI.

I answered this question as follows:

For 4 g729r8 concurrent calls over the WAN using RSVP for CAC:
compressed ip/udp/rtp=2bytes
FRF.12=8Bytes
g729 payload @ 20ms=20Bytes
30*50*8/1000=12Kbps per call so 3 calls=36Kbps

1 call all @ worse case scenario
compressed ip/udp/rtp=2bytes
FRF.12=8Bytes
g729 payload @ 10ms=10bytes
20*100*8/1000 = 1 call 16Kbps  So 4 calls=36kbps + 16Kbps= 52Kbps configured in 
priority queue


Can anyone let me know if my approach is right or wrong and if wrong why?
Thanks a lot
Daniel

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

2010-06-25 Thread naoufal kerboute
Hi,

I'm playing with multicast moh over the flash of router, the configuration 
looks good and I can see in the debug the moh traffic, but on the PSTN phone I 
heard only bips.

below the output of debug ephone moh:
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2
Jun 25 18:03:09.173: ifs_read flash:music-on-hold.au end of file at 492545 read 
3976 = 496521
Jun 25 18:03:09.177: moh tail fill from 24 at 0x4A0E9FF8 length 4024
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2


I've created a region who use g711 with other regions, activated the multicast 
on the source file and the moh server.


Any Ideas?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

2010-06-25 Thread naoufal kerboute
Thanks Mark,
However I'm not missing this configuration, may be the file is corrupted.
Because I did it with the same way in lab1 vol1 on PL vRack, and Now I'm on 
Vol2Lab2.

De : Mark Holloway [...@markholloway.com]
Date d'envoi : vendredi 25 juin 2010 18:47
À : naoufal kerboute
Cc : ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

Amy and Jeff helped me with this the other day.  Here is what I was missing 
(from Jeff's reply)

max-ephones 1
max-dn 1
ip source ip address of voice vlan/loop

Also, under global config add the following command:
ccm-manager music-on-hold bind source ip address configured under
ccm-manager-fallback



On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:24 PM, naoufal kerboute wrote:

Hi,

I'm playing with multicast moh over the flash of router, the configuration 
looks good and I can see in the debug the moh traffic, but on the PSTN phone I 
heard only bips.

below the output of debug ephone moh:
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2
Jun 25 18:03:09.173: ifs_read flash:music-on-hold.au end of file at 492545 read 
3976 = 496521
Jun 25 18:03:09.177: moh tail fill from 24 at 0x4A0E9FF8 length 4024
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2


I've created a region who use g711 with other regions, activated the multicast 
on the source file and the moh server.


Any Ideas?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

2010-06-25 Thread naoufal kerboute
Hi Ashar,

I need to play in case to forget the stress of the lab, it's coming soon.
I think you are right the problem on the UCM side, I will try to restart the 
Media voice app and back to you.
The output of show ccm-manager music-on-hold

BR1-RTR#show ccm-manager music-on-hold
Current active multicast sessions : 0
So ucm didn't provide any multicast to the router.

Regards



De : Ashar Siddiqui [siddas...@gmail.com]
Date d'envoi : vendredi 25 juin 2010 18:51
À : naoufal kerboute
Cc : ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

First of all, why are you playing? You should be labbing properly as voice 
field is not a playground..

Joke aside... ;)

What is your ‘show ccm-manager music-on-hold ?

If no MoH streams are shown by this command then CCM has failed to provide the 
gateway with MoH

Also keep in mind Tone on hold means there is a CM misconfiguration. Silence 
means the RTP is not getting to the router.

Your case is CCM configuration issue. Check configuration again properly.

Check at Pub CCM  the MOH server - region/Device pool selected properly, reset 
it and then login to subscriber..go to the same place and reset it from there 
as well.

Also restart Media Voice app.

The output you posted means that you have proper telephony-service 
configuration (max-dn/max-ephone etc)...problem is at cucm side..

You can now continue playing..

Ash

naoufal kerboute wrote:
Hi,

I'm playing with multicast moh over the flash of router, the configuration 
looks good and I can see in the debug the moh traffic, but on the PSTN phone I 
heard only bips.

below the output of debug ephone moh:
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2
Jun 25 18:03:09.173: ifs_read flash:music-on-hold.au end of file at 492545 read 
3976 = 496521
Jun 25 18:03:09.177: moh tail fill from 24 at 0x4A0E9FF8 length 4024
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2


I've created a region who use g711 with other regions, activated the multicast 
on the source file and the moh server.


Any Ideas?



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

2010-06-25 Thread naoufal kerboute
Hi Ashar,

I've tried what u told me but without success, also I've noticed that the call 
disconnected after 26 seconds

below the debug for ccm-manager music-on-hold all

BR1-RTR#debug ccm-manager music-on-hold all
Call Manager music-on-hold all debugging is on
BR1-RTR#
Jun 25 19:06:01.529: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID -1
Jun 25 19:06:01.537: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
Jun 25 19:06:01.537: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
BR1-RTR#
Jun 25 19:06:03.885: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
Jun 25 19:06:03.885: moh_process_ccb: dstadr 192.168.10.22, callid 37, port 
25612,
codec 12, moh_en 0, moh_addr 0.0.0.0
Jun 25 19:06:03.889: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
BR1-RTR#
Jun 25 19:06:06.389: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
BR1-RTR#
Jun 25 19:06:31.393: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
Jun 25 19:06:31.409: moh_delete_ccb: called dstadr 0.0.0.0, callid 0

Any ideas?
May be the QoS??

Thank you


De : Ashar Siddiqui [siddas...@gmail.com]
Date d'envoi : vendredi 25 juin 2010 18:51
À : naoufal kerboute
Cc : ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

First of all, why are you playing? You should be labbing properly as voice 
field is not a playground..

Joke aside... ;)

What is your ‘show ccm-manager music-on-hold ?

If no MoH streams are shown by this command then CCM has failed to provide the 
gateway with MoH

Also keep in mind Tone on hold means there is a CM misconfiguration. Silence 
means the RTP is not getting to the router.

Your case is CCM configuration issue. Check configuration again properly.

Check at Pub CCM  the MOH server - region/Device pool selected properly, reset 
it and then login to subscriber..go to the same place and reset it from there 
as well.

Also restart Media Voice app.

The output you posted means that you have proper telephony-service 
configuration (max-dn/max-ephone etc)...problem is at cucm side..

You can now continue playing..

Ash

naoufal kerboute wrote:
Hi,

I'm playing with multicast moh over the flash of router, the configuration 
looks good and I can see in the debug the moh traffic, but on the PSTN phone I 
heard only bips.

below the output of debug ephone moh:
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2
Jun 25 18:03:09.173: ifs_read flash:music-on-hold.au end of file at 492545 read 
3976 = 496521
Jun 25 18:03:09.177: moh tail fill from 24 at 0x4A0E9FF8 length 4024
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2


I've created a region who use g711 with other regions, activated the multicast 
on the source file and the moh server.


Any Ideas?



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : RE : Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

2010-06-25 Thread naoufal kerboute
GOT IT

BR1-RTR#sh ccm-manager music-on-hold
Current active multicast sessions : 1
 Multicast   RTP port   Packets   Call   CodecIncoming
 Address number in/outid  Interface
===
239.1.1.1 16384   98/9849   g711ulaw  Lo0


I forgot to do a no mgcp / mgcp on the BR1 router :)
I've added the MRGL to the DP BR1 and it's associated to the gateway. so I had 
to restart the mgcp to take effect.

Thank you guys



De : ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] de la part de naoufal kerboute 
[naoufal.kerbo...@cbi.ma]
Date d'envoi : vendredi 25 juin 2010 20:07
À : Ashar Siddiqui
Cc : ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Objet : [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

Hi Ashar,

I've tried what u told me but without success, also I've noticed that the call 
disconnected after 26 seconds

below the debug for ccm-manager music-on-hold all

BR1-RTR#debug ccm-manager music-on-hold all
Call Manager music-on-hold all debugging is on
BR1-RTR#
Jun 25 19:06:01.529: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID -1
Jun 25 19:06:01.537: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
Jun 25 19:06:01.537: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
BR1-RTR#
Jun 25 19:06:03.885: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
Jun 25 19:06:03.885: moh_process_ccb: dstadr 192.168.10.22, callid 37, port 
25612,
codec 12, moh_en 0, moh_addr 0.0.0.0
Jun 25 19:06:03.889: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
BR1-RTR#
Jun 25 19:06:06.389: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
BR1-RTR#
Jun 25 19:06:31.393: moh_update_rtp: callID 38 dstCallID 37
Jun 25 19:06:31.409: moh_delete_ccb: called dstadr 0.0.0.0, callid 0

Any ideas?
May be the QoS??

Thank you


De : Ashar Siddiqui [siddas...@gmail.com]
Date d'envoi : vendredi 25 juin 2010 18:51
À : naoufal kerboute
Cc : ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Objet : Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multicast Moh from Flash of BR1

First of all, why are you playing? You should be labbing properly as voice 
field is not a playground..

Joke aside... ;)

What is your ‘show ccm-manager music-on-hold ?

If no MoH streams are shown by this command then CCM has failed to provide the 
gateway with MoH

Also keep in mind Tone on hold means there is a CM misconfiguration. Silence 
means the RTP is not getting to the router.

Your case is CCM configuration issue. Check configuration again properly.

Check at Pub CCM  the MOH server - region/Device pool selected properly, reset 
it and then login to subscriber..go to the same place and reset it from there 
as well.

Also restart Media Voice app.

The output you posted means that you have proper telephony-service 
configuration (max-dn/max-ephone etc)...problem is at cucm side..

You can now continue playing..

Ash

naoufal kerboute wrote:
Hi,

I'm playing with multicast moh over the flash of router, the configuration 
looks good and I can see in the debug the moh traffic, but on the PSTN phone I 
heard only bips.

below the output of debug ephone moh:
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:04.729: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2
Jun 25 18:03:09.173: ifs_read flash:music-on-hold.au end of file at 492545 read 
3976 = 496521
Jun 25 18:03:09.177: moh tail fill from 24 at 0x4A0E9FF8 length 4024
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP
Jun 25 18:03:10.017: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2


I've created a region who use g711 with other regions, activated the multicast 
on the source file and the moh server.


Any Ideas?



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Voice Acess

2010-05-17 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Hi,
You need only the pin. When you call the MVA number the cucm Check  
your number with the remote destination profile, if match the mva ask  
you for the pin.
I hope this will help you.

Naoufal

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 17 mai 2010 à 21:43, Divin Mathew John divinj...@gmail.com a  
écrit :

 Is it possible to configure Mobile Voice access, wihtout the need to
 enter username and PIN before the user places a call? If yes tell me
 where do I tweak.

 Cheers

 Divin
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Schedule

2010-05-17 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
90 days before the exam date if you Will pay by wire transfer, you CAN  
schedule and pay by Visa card, it's better


Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 17 mai 2010 à 22:10, akash patel akashapa...@yahoo.com a écrit :

I am planning to take lab in couple months.  I called Cisco Support  
and they told me that you can't schedule your exam less than 90 days  
ago.


Does anyone know if there is a workaround and schedule the lab  
whenever the seats are available.


Thank you
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Router question

2010-02-07 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Check your partition and css

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 7 févr. 2010 à 00:41, Jefferson Wilson jwil...@annese.com a  
écrit :

 Good evening.



 I am working on Lab 2 from the 4 day instructor led calls this  
 evening (EST) and when  I call from the BR2-LON line I get the  
 following from the PSTN router.  I am dailling 77353002.  I get a  
 fast busy after 7735.

 I can not call 011442077353003 either.  I get a fast busy at the the  
 second 3.



 Any thoughts.  I don’t want to reconfigure the PSTN router.   I  
 don’t think we are supposed to.



 Thank you,



 Jefferson



 --More--

 Feb  7 01:28:46.731: //-1//DPM/ 
 dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:

Calling Number=02077354765, Called Number=, Voice- 
 Interface=0x486363D8,

Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOICE, Peer Search  
 Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE,

Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH

 Feb  7 01:28:46.731: //-1//DPM/ 
 dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:

Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_ORIGINATE; Incoming Dial- 
 peer=20004

 Feb  7 01:28:48.291: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:

Calling Number=, Called Number=7, Peer Info  
 Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH

 Feb  7 01:28:48.291: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:

Match Rule=DP_MATCH_DEST; Called Number=7

 Feb  7 01:28:48.291: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:

Result=Partial Matches(1) after DP_MATCH_DEST

 Feb  7 01:28:48.291: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersMoreArg:

Result=MORE_DIGITS_NEEDED(1)

 Feb  7 01:28:49.319: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:

Calling Number=, Called Number=77, Peer Info  
 Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH

 Feb  7 01:28:49.319: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:

Match Rule=DP_MATCH_DEST; Called Number=77

 Feb  7 01:28:49.319: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:

Result=Partial Matches(1) after DP_MATCH_DEST

 Feb  7 01:28:49.319: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersMoreArg:

Result=MORE_DIGITS_NEEDED(1)

 Feb  7 01:28:51.019: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:

Calling Number=, Called Number=773, Peer Info  
 Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH

 Feb  7 01:28:51.019: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:

Match Rule=DP_MATCH_DEST; Called Number=773

 Feb  7 01:28:51.019: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:

No Outgoing Dial-peer Is Matched; Result=NO_MATCH(-1)

 Feb  7 01:28:51.019: //-1/F88A661B80A7/DPM/dpMatchPeersMoreArg:

Result=NO_MATCH(-1)

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com