[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE
Have you ever had issues with cue jtapi init? it always seems to get stuck using the web gui, so i have always used the cli. however, would like to get it working both ways. it seems to consistently get stuck on initialization page. i'm using an aim vs. the nm, don't know if that has anything to do with it Paul From: Paul Dardinski Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:34 AM To: 'Chris Green'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation SupportVoice and Unified CommunicationsSupportProduct SupportVoice and Unified CommunicationsCisco Unified Communications Manager ExpressConfigureConfiguration GuidesCisco Unified CME B-ACD and Tcl Call-Handling Applications Paul (RS/Sec #16842) From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chris Green Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 5:41 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation Hi All Can you guid me to find b-acd on cisco documentation. Is any one has the steps link. Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] priority-queue out
My understanding is the same as yours. Include priority queue and at that point presumably all ranged (assigned) traffic will go out as priority on that queue regardless. Assuming this traffic was to exceed allocations on other queues, they are indeed crowded out, making share/shape irrelevant. Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dial Peer Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 3:02 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] priority-queue out I'm confused by all the discussions about priority-queue out command. From my understanding, this command eanble strict priority, which means none of the other queues can transmit until the priority queue was emptied. If this command was enabled, both the srr-queue bandwidth share and srr-queue bandwidth shape will be pointless. Because the switch will neither share nor shape until the priority queue was emptied. Did I understand this wrong? Thanks! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation
SupportVoice and Unified CommunicationsSupportProduct SupportVoice and Unified CommunicationsCisco Unified Communications Manager ExpressConfigureConfiguration GuidesCisco Unified CME B-ACD and Tcl Call-Handling Applications Paul (RS/Sec #16842) From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chris Green Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 5:41 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation Hi All Can you guid me to find b-acd on cisco documentation. Is any one has the steps link. Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Looking for serious study partner
If anyone is scheduled for voice lab attempt, let me know if interested in studying. Thanks, Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) === Paul Dardinski - CCIE #16842 (RS Security) CCVP, CCNP, CCDA, MCSE, MBA Cisco Wireless Specialist Marshall Communications 20098 Ashbrook Place Suite 260 Ashburn, VA 20147 (571) 209-3905 FAX: (571) 223-2012 === From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Greg Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 4:18 PM To: Adam Frankel (afrankel) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to verify class-based traffic shape? I cannot have it on interface since I have MQC class configured. The system gave me an error if I tried to. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Adam Frankel (afrankel) afran...@cisco.com wrote: Do you have frame-relay trafic-shaping on the physical serial interface? (not the sub-interface) Adam Original Message-- From: Greg cnn...@gmail.com mailto:cnn...@gmail.com Sent: Wed, Jun 15, 2011 3:11:00 Pm To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com CC: Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to verify class-based traffic shape? Per SRND, I configured FRF.12 as below: class-map match-any signal match dscp cs3 match dscp af31 class-map match-any voice match dscp ef ! policy-map wan-edge class voice priority percent 33 class signal bandwidth percent 5 class class-default fair-queue ! policy-map shape384 class class-default shape average 364800 3648 0 service-policy wan-edge ! interface Serial0/1/0.102 point-to-point bandwidth 384 frame-relay interface-dlci 102 class map384 What command we would use to verify the shaping? I tried command show traffic-shape but got nothing. show policy-map interface didn't give statistics on shaping. Thanks! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 8, Q2.3
Kind of stuck here and really cannot find the issue. Calls out to BR2 work fine, 323 to the cube, sip to br2. (Task 2.2). However, calls to UCM are getting reorder. I don't see the incoming calls on CDRs. Running ccapi and 245 debugs seems to point to a q.850, cause 57. The dialp inout shows correct ingress and egress on the peers. The ICT on UCM has inbound faststart enabled. Any ideas where to look? I've been all over the PG and I'm sure I'm compliant with their solution, but getting frustrated : ) Paul Dardinski (RS/Sec #16842) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR and ANI formatting
I am running into this as well. I am seeing the 4D going on the egress PSTN call even though I have explicitly configured cng txform on the gw. I also get the correct ANI on directly dialed (ie. 91617863), but on the AAR forced call () I end up with only the 4D in the cng and redir cng. Does AAR require it to be done on an explicit AAR only RP/RL ? Also, can someone clarify AAR CSS/group at the device level? Normally it is required to enable AAR at the Line level for the E164 completion (using the external phone# mask) , so is the device level AAR configuration for separate call routing? Thanks in advance, Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of kobel Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 11:02 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR and ANI formatting Hello, I'm playing with AAR and VM. When out of bandwidth condition occurs, AAR correctly kicks in for different types of calls (between HQ and BR1, direct calls to VM from BR1, for incoming PSTN calls to BR1 forwarded to voicemail in HQ). It seems that the configuration is ok. But I've an issue with ANI format sent to PSTN when AAR is used. All ANI/DNIS manipulation is done on BR1 gateway via Calling/Called Party Transformation Rules. When I make a call from BR1 to VM in HQ via PSTN (explicitly, using 9.12123945600), the ANI is formatted correctly (6178631xxx/subscriber). But when I press the messages button in BR1, I can see following output from debug isdn q931 on BR1 router (outgoing SETUP): Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '1002' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0xA0, '12123945600' Plan:Unknown, Type:National Redirecting Number i = 0x81, '5600' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Surprisingly, in the CUC port monitor I can see completely different information - please compare with attached screenshot. I needed to configure alternative extension in CUC to correctly recognize the caller as CUC subscriber. It seems that AAR can handle such call correctly, but it doesn't respect the ANI transformation rules on the GW. Have you also observed this behaviour? Is there any workaround? regards kobel ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Real time tracing of IP phone activity
All, Is there something beyond enabling trace level in Servicability that is required to get this to work? I have enabled serv level to significant and I can see the SDI traces appear in RTMT (with delay), but the “file tail activelog /cm/trace/cmi/sdi recent” isn’t working for me. I get a short output, but beyond that it never feeds anything else. I have forced the pub to be primary just to confirm that it would be the call agent for the output. Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) admin:file tail activelog /cm/trace/cmi/sdi recent 06/07/2010 00:30:26.957 CMI|DB: Str[ParamValue]=[1]|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.1.200.20LVL::AllMASK:: 06/07/2010 00:30:26.957 CMI|DB: Int[tkParam]=[3]|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.1.200.20LVL::AllMASK:: 06/07/2010 00:30:26.957 CMI|DB: MoveNext() EOF: TRUE|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.1.200.20LVL::AllMASK:: 06/07/2010 00:30:26.957 CMI|DB: IsEOF(): TRUE|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.1.200.20LVL::AllMASK:: 06/07/2010 00:30:26.957 CMI|DB: ~CFastAccess(ProcessConfig_EnterpriseWide)|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.1.200.20LVL::AllMASK:: 06/07/2010 00:30:26.961 CMI|DB: CFastAccess(CallManager)|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.1.200.20LVL::AllMASK:: 06/07/2010 00:30:26.961 CMI|SQL[select cm.pkid, cm.name, cm.fkprocessnode, pn.name as processnodename, cm.ctiid from callmanager as cm, processnode as pn where cm.fkprocessnode = pn.pkid and cm.fkprocessnode = '551fe708-709c-45ad-9b93-eb4687bd2ca6']|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.1.200.20LVL::AllMASK:: 06/07/2010 00:30:26.977 CMI|DB: MoveNext() EOF: FALSE|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.1.200.20LVL::AllMASK:: 06/07/2010 00:30:26.977 CMI|DB: IsEOF(): FALSE|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.1.200.20LVL::AllMASK:: 06/07/2010 00:30:26.977 CMI|DB: Guid[fkprocessnode]=[551fe708-709c-45ad-9b93-eb4687bd2ca6]|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.1.200.20LVL::AllMASK:: From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of kobel Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:18 AM To: Matthew Berry Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Real time tracing of IP phone activity Just a side note - I also use those two commands, but with a little modification: file tail activelog /cm/trace/cmi/sdi recent this makes the CLI to choose the most recent file (no need to type in the filename yourself). RTMT is such a waste of time, when it comes to traces ;) BTW, the most useful are SDI traces (SDLs are less readable and are used for inter-ccm communications - I never use them in lab). It's easy to remember - SD-III like IIIncredibly useful traces :D regards kobel On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com wrote: I would turn on detailed tracing through CUCM Serviceability and then monitoring the SDL or SDI traces (I always forget which one) through the CUCM CLI. It's the best way I know how. file tail activelog /cm/trace/cmi/sdl file tail activelog /cm/trace/cmi/sdi ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Physical Components for CCIE Voice Lab
Agreed. You can also use a 3640 with cheap cards for pstn -- Paul Dardinski - via Blackberry From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com To: amuno...@hotmail.com amuno...@hotmail.com; osl osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sun May 16 10:41:54 2010 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Physical Components for CCIE Voice Lab Hi: 4 gateways: 2801 for hq, 2801 for br1, 2811 for br2 (you need a NM cue or 2801 with AIM CUE), 2811 for pstn + wic cards + t1/e1 cards + pvdms + cue + hwic-4esw + 3750 + 5-6 ip phones + cables Plus a quad core with 8/16 gb mem hth From: amuno...@hotmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:28:49 -0500 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Physical Components for CCIE Voice Lab Hello, I am recently passed the CCIE Voice Written, then I am so excited for going on with the CCIE Voice Lab. The question that I have for yours, what physical components such as router should I buy for preparing for the Lab??? I have thought in buying the following: · router C2901-CME-SRST/K9, included Unity Express base release 8.0 · Two ip phones 7942G · Server for virtualization of CUCM (Pub + Sub), UC, UCCX, UPS, WinXP for IP Communicator. What could you suggest me for preparing for the Lab??when I feel that I am ready, I will take a bootcamp with IPExpert. I would appreciate your help and experience in this case, I want to start well since the beginning. Best regards, Alexis Munoz CCNP, CCVP, PMP Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper registration questions
Thanks so much Scott. I does appear that CUBE is what dictates gw reg type. Very much appreciated. Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) From: scott carruthers [mailto:scarruthe...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:35 PM To: Paul Dardinski; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper registration questions Paul, I haven't played around with forcing the output Type to either VOIP-GW or H323-GW much - but are you sure that your attempts is not backwards? In other words - I had the site C GW configured as a CUBE/with allow-connections configured and my gatekeeper output looked like: GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1720 10.10.110.3 60462 GKH323-GW E164-ID: 3001 E164-ID: 3002 E164-ID: 3999 H323-ID: CUCME Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.101720 10.10.210.1032885 GKVOIP-GW H323-ID: GK-Trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.111720 10.10.210.1132786 GKVOIP-GW H323-ID: GK-Trunk_2 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 I removed the allow connection statements and my output changed to - this would seem to indicate the device will register as a VOIP-GW when it is not acting as a ip to ip GW: HQ-RTR#show gatek end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1720 10.10.110.3 51687 GKVOIP-GW E164-ID: 3001 E164-ID: 3002 E164-ID: 3999 H323-ID: CUCME Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.101720 10.10.210.1032885 GKVOIP-GW H323-ID: GK-Trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.210.111720 10.10.210.1132786 GKVOIP-GW H323-ID: GK-Trunk_2 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:57:37 -0400 From: pa...@marshallcomm.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper registration questions All, Can anyone explain the core of how a gateway registration is recorded with the sh gatek endp command. Normally, as I understand it, a full H323 gw will register to a gk as type H323-GW, whereas the UCM will register as VOIP-GW. However, I'm running into a situation where no matter what I do my BR2 endpoint is registering with the HQ gk as VOIP-GW. I found reference elsewhere to a 323gw will register as voip-gw if it is configured as a CUBE. In this case though it isn't configured as a CUBE. I've put the pertinent VERY basic commands below. What I'm really looking for is some clarification on the different types and why they register differently if possible. Thanks for any help, Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) HQ-RTR#sh run | s gatekeeper gatekeeper zone local HQ ipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 no shutdown HQ-RTR#sh gatek end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1720 10.10.110.3 65184 HQVOIP-GW E164-ID: 3102 H323-ID: BR2-RTR Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.1.200.20 48779 10.1.200.20 32824 HQVOIP-GW H323-ID: HQgk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.1.200.21 37078 10.1.200.21 32849 HQVOIP-GW H323-ID: HQgk_2 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registratio BR2-RTRen BR2-RTR#sh run int Loop0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 163 bytes ! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.10.110.3 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-RTR end BR2-RTR#sh gateway H.323 ITU-T Version: 4.0 H323 Stack Version: 0.1 H.323 service is up Gateway BR2-RTR is registered to Gatekeeper HQ Alias list (CLI configured) E164-ID 3102 H323-ID BR2-RTR Alias list (last RCF) E164-ID 3102 H323-ID BR2-RTR H323 resource thresholding is Disabled BR2-RTR# BR2-RTR#sh run | s voice service voice service voip The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get started. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper registration questions
All, Can anyone explain the core of how a gateway registration is recorded with the sh gatek endp command. Normally, as I understand it, a full H323 gw will register to a gk as type H323-GW, whereas the UCM will register as VOIP-GW. However, I'm running into a situation where no matter what I do my BR2 endpoint is registering with the HQ gk as VOIP-GW. I found reference elsewhere to a 323gw will register as voip-gw if it is configured as a CUBE. In this case though it isn't configured as a CUBE. I've put the pertinent VERY basic commands below. What I'm really looking for is some clarification on the different types and why they register differently if possible. Thanks for any help, Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) HQ-RTR#sh run | s gatekeeper gatekeeper zone local HQ ipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 no shutdown HQ-RTR#sh gatek end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 10.10.110.3 1720 10.10.110.3 65184 HQVOIP-GW E164-ID: 3102 H323-ID: BR2-RTR Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.1.200.20 48779 10.1.200.20 32824 HQVOIP-GW H323-ID: HQgk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.1.200.21 37078 10.1.200.21 32849 HQVOIP-GW H323-ID: HQgk_2 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registratio BR2-RTRen BR2-RTR#sh run int Loop0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 163 bytes ! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.10.110.3 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-RTR end BR2-RTR#sh gateway H.323 ITU-T Version: 4.0 H323 Stack Version: 0.1 H.323 service is up Gateway BR2-RTR is registered to Gatekeeper HQ Alias list (CLI configured) E164-ID 3102 H323-ID BR2-RTR Alias list (last RCF) E164-ID 3102 H323-ID BR2-RTR H323 resource thresholding is Disabled BR2-RTR# BR2-RTR#sh run | s voice service voice service voip ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 1719 issue....
Explicitly did that, both peers get hit on the gk. (2001 to 2002 and vice
versa for call in other direction). I added the h225 connect-passth. Still
getting fast-busy on inbound call from br2 to cm.
Thanks so much for the help
The asn1 shows reject:
Feb 11 16:41:44.941: RAS OUTGOING PDU ::=
value RasMessage ::= admissionReject :
{
requestSeqNum 3278
rejectReason undefinedReason : NULL
nonStandardData
{
nonStandardIdentifier h221NonStandard :
{
t35CountryCode 181
t35Extension 0
manufacturerCode 18
}
data 'D10008028083038001600901102011700010'H
}
}
===
Paul Dardinski - CCIE #16842 (RS Security)
CCVP, CCNP, CCDA, MCSE, MBA
Cisco Wireless Specialist
Marshall Communications
20098 Ashbrook Place
Suite 260
Ashburn, VA 20147
(571) 223-2010 (Ext 105)
FAX: (571) 223-2012
===
From: Angel Perez [mailto:gorr...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:20 AM
To: Paul Dardinski; osl osl
Cc: earl.ho...@sarcom.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 1719 issue
Hi:
Use debug voip dialpeer all at br2 and hq, just to verify that the call is
hiting the correct outgoing/incomind dial peers, this way you may isolate the
problem in hq or br2 router.
Also try with deb h225 asn1 and try to find admission reject message.
Sometimes this command is also necesary:
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 1719 issue
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:22:27 -0500
From: pa...@marshallcomm.com
To: gorr...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
CC: earl.ho...@sarcom.com
Thanks Angel. Alas, trunk definitely in its own region (BR2, 729). I'd had to
uncheck the wait for h.245 to make the egress calling work (from UCM) and right
now all locations (UCM) have unlimited bandwidth. I did not explicitly do
anything to inter or intra zone bandwidth on the gk so that should have been
fine.
Paul
===
Paul Dardinski - CCIE #16842 (RS Security)
CCVP, CCNP, CCDA, MCSE, MBA
Cisco Wireless Specialist
Marshall Communications
20098 Ashbrook Place
Suite 260
Ashburn, VA 20147
(571) 223-2010 (Ext 105)
FAX: (571) 223-2012
===
From: Angel Perez [mailto:gorr...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 3:31 AM
To: Paul Dardinski; osl osl
Cc: earl.ho...@sarcom.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 1719 issue
Hello:
Check the following
- The gk trunk most be in region that speaks g729 with hq region
- Unchek wait for h245 capabilities check box at gk trunk
- Also be sure that the calls is g729 and gk cac has enough bandwith (erase
bandwith commands from gk config to be sure)
hth
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:53:02 -0500
From: pa...@marshallcomm.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
CC: earl.ho...@sarcom.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 1719 issue
I'm looking for some help re: via gk intrazone UCM-CME
Basically with the below I'm able to egress call from UCM via GK to remote BR2.
However, ingress calls via BR2-to-UCM are failing. Configuration of course
works if I don't use viazone, but enabling the via seems to be causing issue
with UCM. Below see my pertinent configs. UCM has a translation inbound
dropping the prefix 7. Note that I'm currently running 729 on both legs and UCM
has cac set to 729 to BR2. Config works if running straight non-via (remove the
invia/outvia). Ignore the static statement as I have tried with and without it,
but leaving it in for the moment unless someone can advise? Any tips here would
be GREATLY appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
Paul
GK CONFIG (applicable config):
HQ_Rtr:
voice service voip
allow-connections h323 to h323
interface Loopback0
ip address 10.10.32.1 255.255.255.255
ip ospf network point-to-point
h323-gateway voip interface
h323-gateway voip id VIA ipaddr 10.10.32.1 1719
h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ_Rtr
h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.32.1
gatekeeper
zone local CM ccbootcamp.com 10.10.32.1 invia VIA outvia VIA enable-intrazone
zone local VIA ccbootcamp.com
alias static 10.1.200.21 34491 gkid CM gateway voip ras 10.1.200.21 32880 e164
2002 e164 2001 e164 1002 e164 1001
gw-type-prefix 1
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 1719 issue....
I'm looking for some help re: via gk intrazone UCM-CME Basically with the below I'm able to egress call from UCM via GK to remote BR2. However, ingress calls via BR2-to-UCM are failing. Configuration of course works if I don't use viazone, but enabling the via seems to be causing issue with UCM. Below see my pertinent configs. UCM has a translation inbound dropping the prefix 7. Note that I'm currently running 729 on both legs and UCM has cac set to 729 to BR2. Config works if running straight non-via (remove the invia/outvia). Ignore the static statement as I have tried with and without it, but leaving it in for the moment unless someone can advise? Any tips here would be GREATLY appreciated! Thanks in advance, Paul GK CONFIG (applicable config): HQ_Rtr: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 interface Loopback0 ip address 10.10.32.1 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id VIA ipaddr 10.10.32.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ_Rtr h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.32.1 gatekeeper zone local CM ccbootcamp.com 10.10.32.1 invia VIA outvia VIA enable-intrazone zone local VIA ccbootcamp.com alias static 10.1.200.21 34491 gkid CM gateway voip ras 10.1.200.21 32880 e164 2002 e164 2001 e164 1002 e164 1001 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology no shutdown dial-peer voice 2001 voip destination-pattern 7 session target ras dial-peer voice 2002 voip destination-pattern 3... session target ras HQ_Rtr(config-gk)#do sh gatek end GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - 10.10.32.1 1720 10.10.32.1 62047 VIA H323-GW H323-ID: HQ_Rtr Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.10.32.3 1720 10.10.32.3 51829 CMH323-GW H323-ID: CME E164-ID: 3003 E164-ID: 3001 E164-ID: 442076303001 E164-ID: 3002 E164-ID: 3019 E164-ID: 3020 E164-ID: 3017 E164-ID: 3018 E164-ID: 3111 E164-ID: 3021 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.1.200.20 49699 10.1.200.20 36939 CMVOIP-GW H323-ID: GK_Trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 10.1.200.21 34491 10.1.200.21 32880 CMVOIP-GW D S H323-ID: GK_Trunk_2 E164-ID: 2002 (static) E164-ID: 2001 (static) E164-ID: 1002 (static) E164-ID: 1001 (static) Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 5 HQ_Rtr#sh gatek gw-type-prefix GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 1#*(Default gateway-technology) Zone CM master gateway list: 10.10.32.3:1720 CME 10.1.200.20:49699 GK_Trunk_1 10.1.200.21:34491 GK_Trunk_2 BR2: (confirmed that 2003 is egress peer via deb voi dialp inout) dial-peer voice 2003 voip description to gk destination-pattern 7[12]... session target ras dial-peer voice 2004 voip description incoming voip default destination-pattern 3... session target ras === Paul Dardinski - CCIE #16842 (RS Security) CCVP, CCNP, CCDA, MCSE, MBA Cisco Wireless Specialist Marshall Communications 20098 Ashbrook Place Suite 260 Ashburn, VA 20147 (571) 223-2010 (Ext 105) FAX: (571) 223-2012 === ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RTP availability
Anyone heard any word if the closed til July RTP availability is a temporary phenomena or is it pretty much set in stone that there won't be a date in RTP til July 1? I'm asking as my written expires 5/12/10 and I had planned to attempt in April timeframe, but SJC would mean much more travel time...which I can't take at this point. Paul (RS/Sec #16842) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Help with hware transcoding......
All, Maybe I have been staring at SecureCRT just too many hours..frankly need some help figuring out if I have a hardware issue or just a bonehead operator issue In essence, I simply cannot get the hware transcoder to invoke on calls. I definitely have a fully registered profile, sccp shows fine and all seems right with its world. However, on incoming calls from the gk, if I set the codec to g729 on the incoming voip peer 2001, the call connects from UCM to the 3002 extension without issue. If, however, I change the incoming peer to g711u, then I get the fast busy on call pickup. I've debugged just about everything I can and it just seems that while the correct peers are getting hit, the transcoder just never answers the request. Below see the full config, the sh dspf all, the sh sccp, sh sdspf sess. Any ideas on why the transcoder doesn't want to cooperate? Please feel free to insult me if I'm missing some super obvious point. Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) Router#sh sccp SCCP Admin State: UP Gateway Local Interface: Loopback0 IPv4 Address: 10.10.32.3 Port Number: 2000 IP Precedence: 5 User Masked Codec list: None Call Manager: 10.10.32.3, Port Number: 2000 Priority: N/A, Version: 7.0, Identifier: 1 Trustpoint: N/A Transcoding Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE Active Call Manager: 10.10.32.3, Port Number: 2000 TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1 Reported Max Streams: 12, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0 Supported Codec: g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60 Supported Codec: g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60 Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60 Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Router#sh dspf all Dspfarm Profile Configuration Profile ID = 1, Service = TRANSCODING, Resource ID = 1 Profile Description : Profile Service Mode : Non Secure Profile Admin State : UP Profile Operation State : ACTIVE Application : SCCP Status : ASSOCIATED Resource Provider : FLEX_DSPRM Status : UP Number of Resource Configured : 6 Number of Resource Available : 6 Codec Configuration Codec : g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 Codec : g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period : 30 Codec : g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 Codec : g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 Codec : g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60 SLOT DSP VERSION STATUS CHNL USE TYPERSC_ID BRIDGE_ID PKTS_TXED PKTS_RXED 01 23.8.0 UP N/A FREE xcode 1 - - - 01 23.8.0 UP N/A FREE xcode 1 - - - 01 23.8.0 UP N/A FREE xcode 1 - - - 01 23.8.0 UP N/A FREE xcode 1 - - - 02 23.8.0 UP N/A FREE xcode 1 - - - 02 23.8.0 UP N/A FREE xcode 1 - - - Total number of DSPFARM DSP channel(s) 6 Router#sh sdspf sess Stream-ID:1 mtp:1 0.0.0.0 0 Local:0 IDLE usage: codec:G711Ulaw64k duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 Stream-ID:2 mtp:1 0.0.0.0 0 Local:0 IDLE usage: codec:G711Ulaw64k duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 Stream-ID:3 mtp:1 0.0.0.0 0 Local:0 IDLE usage: codec:G711Ulaw64k duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 Stream-ID:4 mtp:1 0.0.0.0 0 Local:0 IDLE usage: codec:G711Ulaw64k duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 Stream-ID:5 mtp:1 0.0.0.0 0 Local:0 IDLE usage: codec:G711Ulaw64k duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 Stream-ID:6 mtp:1 0.0.0.0 0 Local:0 IDLE usage: codec:G711Ulaw64k duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 Stream-ID:7 mtp:1 0.0.0.0 0 Local:0 IDLE usage: codec:G711Ulaw64k duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 Stream-ID:8 mtp:1 0.0.0.0 0 Local:0 IDLE usage: codec:G711Ulaw64k duration:20 vad:0 peer Stream-ID:0 Router# Router#s Mar 1 14:11:32.037: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consoleh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 5481 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 14:11:32 UTC Mon Mar 1 1993 ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname Router ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! logging
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to execute a clean shut down of CUCM 7(UNCLASSIFIED)
Ssh to the cli, execute utils system restart. Paul (#16842 rs/sec) -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 10:49 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to execute a clean shut down of CUCM 7(UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: FOUO Running CUCM 7 inside of VMWare ( as I supposed most of us are). How do you execute a clean shut down/restart of the entire CUCM app? Im not talking about restarting the services. I have tried to SSH to the CLI, but no options there jumped out at me that would work. I have been doing a hard shut of the VM itself, but I know sooner or later that is going to catch up with me. Jeff --- Jeffrey T. Girard (Jeff) COL, 53 Future Forces Integration Directorate (FFID), Deputy - Networks office: (915)568-1240 DSN 978 Mobile: (915)727-4222 reply to: jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: FOUO ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor
You can use an Adtran or just use any platform that will terminate the necessary 2xT1 and 1xE1. I use a 3640 w/2x HDV modules, each with a single mft (2T1, 2E1). I don't know if you are able to look at incoming/outgoing signaling with the Adtran, but on an IOS platform you are able to see incoming and outgoing signaling (for troubleshooting) as well as it conforms to most vendors labset configs. Note however that in the lab you won't be able to access the PSTN side at all, so keep that in mind : ) Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of anupam TYAGI Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:54 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor Hi , I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,, Thanks Anu ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR question
All, I have been working with AAR, but at least in my case I am noticing that the actual dn itself must be assigned an AAR group for the rerouting to occur? I presume this is to enable a more granular approach to AAR (ie. allowing a per-dn-AAR group and prefix). However, if this is the case, where does the AAR group assigned at the device level fit in? If I just configure the AAR group at the device level, the call never reroutes and I get the Network Congestion on the phone, but no reroute. My question then is what is the function of also having the group assigned at the device level? Thanks for any help, Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Service in IP Blue, error ?
Let me know if you find anything on this, I've never been able to get much going in the way of services with IPBlue. PD (#16842 RS/Sec) === From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Erwan Erwan Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 4:27 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Service in IP Blue, error ? hi, last time I saw posting about the Service error in IP Blue, does anyone got the workaround yet ? When tried to register with EM i got error msg : Permission Denied file://C:\Documents file:///C:\Documents and Settings\root\Application Data\IP blue\VTGO\Services\bin\services.html But it work fine with IP Communicator tks in advance erwan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Crack CCIE Ver 3 lab
Good luck when it actually comes time to show you are a ccie, but then again as you say you can handle projects more good then CCIEs. You may want to try a grammar class prior to a lab. Not much else to say on it, I'm sure you will find takers on your sharing the expensive labsmost of us spend 10 times that just on rack equipment for voice. Oh well. Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of crackccielab crackccielab Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 1:37 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Crack CCIE Ver 3 lab Hi Guys, I know after this i will be banned or get unsubscribed Well i just wanted to say we cannot give our 5 years to complete one CCIE lab, So some people will like and some people won't But i want to pass the lab fast as i am having very good experence on projects and can handle projects more good then CCIE's so just need number to earn more. I have just ordered Real lab which CCIE VOICE labs(.)com has released but they are expensive, let me know if someone is interested to share the cost, I am ok to share the labs and all the updates and everything. Also, As i have build my own lab so i have approx 200 vouchers from proctorlabs with me and i am ready to give in very good discount rate, let me know the same. Users can PM me directly for any quiries Here is some demo questions from ccie voice labs (...) com 5.1 CUCM Call Routing - HQ Gateway 5) Unknown Called party number type field is only accepted for 911 emergency calls. Cisco Mobile Connect Once call is answered from PSTN phone, HQ Phone 3 should display IN Use Remote mode and call can be successfully switched without losing connection. Also PM me if someone is really interested to share the stuff and everything. I just need to pass Thanks to people who will like this and support and thanks to people who will kill me after this, but i still love everyone as everyone is working hard to archieve the same. And best of luck from me from my heart. Thks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cme 7.x on 3745 ??
I could be wrong, but check features for the IOS, I think 7.x CME requires 12.4T greater then .15 release, which I don't think the 37xx series can do. Need 28xx box (or at least 18xx I think). Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Padmanabhan, Padhu Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:18 PM To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cme 7.x on 3745 ?? Trying to find ios that can run cme 7.x on 3745 platform The best I can see is cme 4.x on 12.4.wd T8 Anyone else run into this? Thanks Padhu -- Sent using BlackBerry ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cme 7.x on 3745 ??
Right, the 2811 really is the swiss army knife on voice. PD (#16842 RS/Sec) -Original Message- From: Thomas Koch [mailto:koch1...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:31 PM To: Paul Dardinski; 'Padmanabhan, Padhu'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cme 7.x on 3745 ?? I almost picked up a 3745 on E-bay until I went up on CCO and did some research... The last version of IOS is 12.4.15T9 that is posted on the download page for the 3745... I have a 1750V with the same version of code. CME 7.x is in IOS version 12.4.24 or latter... I'm looking for a 2811 on E-bay T Thomas J Koch Owner/Consultant Digitones, LLC Cell: 630-808-4910 E-mail: digito...@comcast.net -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Paul Dardinski Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:23 PM To: Padmanabhan, Padhu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cme 7.x on 3745 ?? I could be wrong, but check features for the IOS, I think 7.x CME requires 12.4T greater then .15 release, which I don't think the 37xx series can do. Need 28xx box (or at least 18xx I think). Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Padmanabhan, Padhu Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:18 PM To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cme 7.x on 3745 ?? Trying to find ios that can run cme 7.x on 3745 platform The best I can see is cme 4.x on 12.4.wd T8 Anyone else run into this? Thanks Padhu -- Sent using BlackBerry ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSP Admin DOWN
Issue no shut on the dspfarm profile...and as you haven't posted rest of the config I presume you have enabled the associated farm under sccp group? Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dave Genton Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 4:09 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSP Admin DOWN Hello, I am new to the study list... I have searched the archives and not seen the issue of dsp being in admin down state, why is this ?? I cannot figure out how to get it admin'd up so it is always showing me zero dsp available. I have an NM-HDV in each of my 3725 lab routers each with either 2 or 3 PVDM SIMMs installed. I am trying to figure out how to determine the dsp resources available, and how to allocate properly based on the dsp information gathered. While I have done a lot of VoIP in the past, not a lot of DSP setup. HQ-Router#sh dspfarm all DSPFARM Configuration Information: Admin State: DOWN, Oper Status: DOWN - Cause code: ADMIN_STATE_DOWN Transcoding Sessions: 0(Avail: 0), Conferencing Sessions: 0 (Avail: 0) Trans sessions for mixed-mode conf: 0 (Avail: 0), RTP Timeout: 600 Connection check interval 600 Codec G729 VAD: ENABLED Total number of active session(s) 0, and connection(s) 0 Total number of DSPFARM DSP channel(s) 0 Thanks in advance, Dave Dave Genton - CCIE #6746 | Architect | Insight Networking | insight.com http://www.insight.com/ m. 614.440.3148 dave.gen...@insight.com mailto:dave.gen...@insight.com The information contained in this message and any attachment may contain privileged or confidential information protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and destroying the original and all copies. Thank you. image001.gifimage002.gif___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
