Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PUT license

2014-08-07 Thread Wilson Samuel (CCIE)


Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 7, 2014, at 2:07 AM, Karen Johnson karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca wrote:
 
 folks,
  
 When we order Full Install / Upgrade media with License   thru PUT (Product 
 Upgrade Tool).
  
 - Does it means our existing cluster license will no longer valid once Cisco 
 send us the Media and license? =  technically yes, however that d
 - Can we download UCM , CUC, UCCX fresh install media thru esnt mean that 
 they abandon you, you still can raise SR with Cisco

 eDelivery  PUT ?
 -I assume if we use eDelivery , we do not need to pay anything  ?

EDelivery means the media will be ISO file downloads, and PAK will be PDF files

HTH 
  
 tks,
 k
  
 ___
 Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::
 
 iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 101, Issue 15

2014-08-07 Thread Wilson Samuel (CCIE)


Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 7, 2014, at 2:00 AM, Karen Johnson karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca wrote:
 
 3 Restore the backup to a new Pub 10.x VM
 4 add the subs.
  
  
 - I assume add subs in steps 4 , means just like new sub install ?
  Only if you have had Removed them during your first DRS install of the 7.x 
 or whatever version you are upgrading from .
You cannot and should not remove the subs during intermediate steps 


 
 
 On Saturday, July 26, 2014 3:09:10 PM, Jerry Reed jerrykr...@live.com wrote:
 
 
 I would just like to be sure I understand,
 1 upgrade the machine to 10.x. Presumably a Sub.
 2 Then backup the upgraded machine with DRS.
 3 Restore the backup to a new Pub 10.x VM
 4 add the subs.
 
 Right?
 
 
 On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:00 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com 
 wrote:
 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
 ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
1. Re: ucm 10 upgrade (Abel Mateo)
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:37:01 +0930
 From: Abel Mateo midga...@gmail.com
 To: Wilson Samuel (CCIE) wilsonc...@gmail.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ucm 10 upgrade
 Message-ID:
 CAJ6s=mb8g7qa89thjibyc80nrho5d641z4wyb_5ofkfoat_...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 
 Agree with Wilson, I Upgrade the machines to 10.x, backup with DRS, restore
 the the publisher in the new OVA with 10.x and install subscribers as
 needed. The cutover must be clean if you dont upgrade the firmware for all
 the phones at the same time, just make a controlled upgrade for the phones
 later. I did this a couple of times and the downtime is just how long the
 equipments take to swap from publisher to subscribers.
 
 
 On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Wilson Samuel (CCIE) wilsonc...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  I have done a few 10.x upgrade from 7.x and 6.x.
 
  I didn't use the prime collaboration.
 
  One thing you may want to do is, one you upgrade the systems to 10.x, take
  a DRS backup and restore it on a 10.x OVA
 
  HTH
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
  On Jul 21, 2014, at 1:14 PM, Scott Beauton sbeau...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 
  I just used  Prime Collaboration Deployment (PCD)  and  product worked
  great but was also full of bugs.   The biggest issue we faced was on the
  night of the cutover a lot of things didn?t work like Ringlists, Extension
  Mobility,  and Corporate Directory.   TAC had to gain root access to CCM
  and PCD was the primary account listed for all the services.  TAC had to
  change each entry to CCM and then things started working.  I spent about
  8hrs with Cisco TAC working on various issues listed with PCD.   I think
  PCD is a great concept but Cisco needs to work out the bugs.   I would use
  caution if you are going to use PCD.   Hope this helps.
 
 
 
  On 7/21/2014 9:50 AM, Karen Johnson wrote:
 
   folks,
 
  we have plan to upgrade UCM, CUC, Presence from version 8.6 to version
  10.5  (around 1000 users)
  And we are using new server upgrade.
 
  - I am looking for advice on detailed steps ?
  -what is the best scenario to minimize the downtime ?
  - do I need to use PCD ?
 
  tks,
  K
 
 
  ___
  Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::
 
  iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
 
 
  ___
  Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::
 
  iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
 
 
  ___
  Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::
 
  iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
 
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20140726/292370f1/attachment-0001.html
 
 --
 
 ___
 Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::
 
 iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
 
 End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 101, Issue 15
 ***
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Jerry Reed
 There are 10 types of people.  Those that understand binary, and those that 
 don't.
 
 ___
 Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::
 
 iPexpert on YouTube

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ucm 10 upgrade

2014-07-25 Thread Wilson Samuel (CCIE)
Hi,

I have done a few 10.x upgrade from 7.x and 6.x.

I didn't use the prime collaboration.

One thing you may want to do is, one you upgrade the systems to 10.x, take a 
DRS backup and restore it on a 10.x OVA

HTH

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jul 21, 2014, at 1:14 PM, Scott Beauton sbeau...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  
 I just used  Prime Collaboration Deployment (PCD)  and  product worked great 
 but was also full of bugs.   The biggest issue we faced was on the night of 
 the cutover a lot of things didn’t work like Ringlists, Extension Mobility,  
 and Corporate Directory.   TAC had to gain root access to CCM and PCD was the 
 primary account listed for all the services.  TAC had to change each entry to 
 CCM and then things started working.  I spent about 8hrs with Cisco TAC 
 working on various issues listed with PCD.   I think PCD is a great concept 
 but Cisco needs to work out the bugs.   I would use caution if you are going 
 to use PCD.   Hope this helps.
 
  
 On 7/21/2014 9:50 AM, Karen Johnson wrote:
 folks,
  
 we have plan to upgrade UCM, CUC, Presence from version 8.6 to version 10.5  
 (around 1000 users)
 And we are using new server upgrade.
  
 - I am looking for advice on detailed steps ?
 -what is the best scenario to minimize the downtime ?
 - do I need to use PCD ?
  
 tks,
 K
 
 
 ___
 Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::
 
 iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
 
 ___
 Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::
 
 iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone digit

2014-06-16 Thread Wilson Samuel (CCIE)
Karen,

By default the type B phones use KPML and that mimics the SCCP behavior on the 
SIP phones as well.
If you use dialing rules on the type b then it will use the enbloc 

HTH 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jun 10, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Karen Johnson karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca wrote:
 
 folks,
 
 How is the dial behaviour in SCCP and SIP phone that register to same UCM.
 
 - SCCP phones dial following digits to other SCCP phone : 2 0 0  0 3  
 
  Assumption : UCM will see separate SCCP message  2 0 0  0 3  (one by one)
 
 - SIP type B dial following digits to other SCCP phone  (SIP dial rule : 2001)
 
  Assumption : UCM will see all digit 2001 in SIP INVITE message once DIAL is 
 press
 
 
 Is the assumption , correct?
 
 tks,
 K
 ___
 Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::
 
 iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice for UC specialization

2013-12-02 Thread Wilson Samuel (CCIE)
Hi Karen,

Sorry I don't have that info handy.
May be the Cisco AM in your area could throw some light (just in case if you 
have not checked already)

Kind Regards


Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 3, 2013, at 1:26 AM, Karen Johnson karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca wrote:
 
 tks, since what year Cisco require CCIE-voice for UC specialization?
 
 From: Sam Wilson wilsonc...@gmail.com
 To: Karen Johnson karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca; 
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
 Sent: Monday, December 2, 2013 2:53:21 AM
 Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice for UC specialization
 
 Hi Karen
 
 Per the Master UC Specialization webpage, I believe it's already a 
 requirement.
 
 HTTP://cisco.com/go/Masteruc
 
 
 Regards
 
 Sent from my Windows Phone
 From: Karen Johnson
 Sent: 12/1/2013 5:48 PM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice for UC specialization
 
 folks
 
 does anyone know when cisco start to require  ccie voice as partner Master UC 
 specialization ?
 
 K
 
 
___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-Relay Sh policy-map interface

2013-08-19 Thread Wilson Samuel (CCIE)
Thank you very much Khalid and somphol it was indeed the fr traffic-shaping 
that was missing 

Thank you very much 

Sent from my iPhone

On 18 Aug 2013, at 08:22, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Yes for policy based shaping , you use the solution given by our friend. Mine 
 is for GTS.
 
 
 
 From: somp...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:44:20 +1000
 To: wilson.sam...@bt.com
 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-Relay Sh policy-map interface
 
 You need to put in extra layer of policy-map for this.
 
 class-map match-any RTP
 
 match protocol rtp
 
 class-map match-any SIG
 
 match protocol skinny
 
 match protocol sip
 
 match protocol h323
 
 match protocol custom-01
 
 !
 
 
 
 policy-map LLQ
 
 class SIG
 
 bandwidth 192
 
 class RTP
 
 priority 64
 
  !
 
 
 policy-map FR-Branch1
 
 class class-default
 
 shape average 364000   !-- not sure if this is mandatory
 
 service-policy LLQ
 
 
 
 map-class frame-relay FR-MC-BR1
 
 service-policy output FR-Branch1
 
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 5:09 PM, wilson.sam...@bt.com wrote:
 Hi All,
 
  
 
 For some reason I am not able to configure the Frame Policy-map applied via 
 the map-class command:
 
  
 
 CorpHQ#sh policy
 
 CorpHQ#sh policy-map inter 
 
  
 
 CorpHQ#
 
  
 
 I have checked everything and nothing seem to be wrong.
 
  
 
 Is there any special / hidden command that I shall need to invoke, in order 
 to apply the Policy-Map on FR Subinterface via the map-class.
 
  
 
 Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
  
 
 Please find below my configuration:
 
  
 
  
 
 Regardss
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 class-map match-any RTP
 
 match protocol rtp
 
 class-map match-any SIG
 
 match protocol skinny
 
 match protocol sip
 
 match protocol h323
 
 match protocol custom-01
 
 !
 
 policy-map FR-Branch1
 
 class SIG
 
 bandwidth 192
 
 class RTP
 
 priority 64
 
  
 
  
 
 interface Serial0/0/1:0
 
 description == Frame-Relay Circuit to WAN
 
 no ip address
 
 encapsulation frame-relay
 
 no keepalive
 
 cdp enable
 
 no frame-relay inverse-arp
 
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
 
 !
 
 interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point
 
 description == FR To BR1
 
 ip address 177.0.101.1 255.255.255.0
 
 snmp trap link-status
 
 frame-relay interface-dlci 101  
 
   class FR-MC-BR1
 
  
 
 !
 
 map-class frame-relay FR-MC-BR1
 
 service-policy output FR-Branch1
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 Kind Regards
 
 Wilson Samuel
 
  
 
 Wilson Samuel |  East Region | BT Global Services |wilson.sam...@bt.com |  
 http://globalservices.bt.com/
 
  
 
 This e-mail contains information from BT which may be privileged or 
 confidential. It's meant only for the individual(s) or entity named above. If 
 you're not the intended recipient, note that disclosing, copying, 
 distributing or using this information is prohibited. If you've received this 
 e-mail in error, please let me know immediately on the e-mail address above. 
 Thank you. We monitor our e-mail system, and may record your e-mails.
 
  
 
 BT Americas Inc., 150 Newport Avenue Ext., Quincy, MA 02171 USA   

 BT Americas Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of British Telecommunications 
 plc.
 
  
 
  
 
 Think before you print! Consider the environment before printing this email!
 
  
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 
 ___ For more information 
 regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB GRADED WITH ALL 0%.

2013-06-13 Thread Wilson Samuel (CCIE)
Hi Ravi,

As far as I know I think one is not allowed to do any physical alteration to 
the lab devices, may be that made it go 0 

However best would be to check on CIsco certification support forum and please 
do share your findings as well 

Regards

Sent from my iPhone

On 10 Jun 2013, at 13:56, michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:

 Ravi,
 
 All 0% does sound a little strange.  I've never heard of anyone getting all 
 0% before.  Possibly your configurations were wiped out somehow.  If you feel 
 that your lab was not graded correctly or there was a problem with grading 
 call the following number and open a case with the CCIE Certifications Team.  
 1.800.553.6387 #4 #1
 --ms
 Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
 Cisco Certified Unfied Communications Computing Systems Specialist
 E911 Infrastructure Specialist
 
 
 Dear All,
 
 I got CCIE lab exam for the first time and I am really unsatisfied 
 about the marks I got. unfortunately I was not able to complete my lab 
 properly but I have configured few sections in good manner. 
 Unfortunately I didn't knew that I removed a cable from a phone and 
 replugged due to phones were not registered with CUCM correctly. when 
 I got a result sheet it was really strange and they given me 0% for 
 each and every section. So is there any way to appeal the exam to 
 cisco and get another chance to attain this valuable certification. I 
 know that I am technically competent. but now I am totally depressed.
 
 Thanks,
 Ravi,
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com