Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls to CUE fail over WAN
Did you enable cube? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com Date: Tue, Dec 27, 2011 7:27 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls to CUE fail over WAN To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hello, I'm in Workbook 2, Lab 8, question 4.5. I have CUE setup properly and calls between CME phones roll successfully to voicemail. However, they fail to roll to voice mail when an HQ phone calls a BR2 phone. The answer guide says to configure an xcoder on the BR2 router. Here's my config. sccp local Vlan400 sccp ccm 10.10.202.1 identifier 1 version 7.0 sccp ! sccp ccm group 1 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate profile 1 register br2-xcoder ! dspfarm profile 1 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 codec g729r8 maximum sessions 4 associate application SCCP telephony-service sdspfarm units 1 sdspfarm transcode sessions 4 sdspfarm tag 1 br2-xcoder authentication credential admin cisco xml user pvadmin password cisco 15 max-ephones 10 max-dn 10 no-reg both ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000 url services http://10.10.202.2/voiceview/common/login.do url authentication http://10.10.202.1/CCMCIP/authenticate.asp pvphone cisco voicemail 3600 max-conferences 12 gain -6 web admin system name admin password cisco transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Dec 28 2011 00:02:05 Here's the dial-peer to CUE. dial-peer voice 3600 voip destination-pattern 3600 session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:10.10.202.2 incoming called-number 3600 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw no vad A sh sccp shows the xcoder registered. BR2-RTR#sh sccp SCCP Admin State: UP Gateway Local Interface: Vlan400 IPv4 Address: 10.10.202.1 Port Number: 2000 IP Precedence: 5 User Masked Codec list: None Call Manager: 10.10.202.1, Port Number: 2000 Priority: N/A, Version: 7.0, Identifier: 1 Trustpoint: N/A Transcoding Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE Active Call Manager: 10.10.202.1, Port Number: 2000 TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1 Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0 Supported Codec: g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60 Supported Codec: g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60 Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60 Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 A trace on the router shows this. Dec 28 00:00:52.604: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: INVITE sip:3600@10.10.202.1:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.200.3:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2AB55 Remote-Party-ID: HQ Phone 2 sip:5002@10.10.200.3;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off From: HQ Phone 2 sip:5002@10.10.200.3;tag=4F3F96E8-171B To: sip:3600@10.10.202.1 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:00:52 GMT Call-ID: D7867EA6-301D11E1-80CE8486-37477DE6@10.10.200.3 Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat Min-SE: 1800 Cisco-Guid: 3615875710-807211489-2160690310-927432166 User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER CSeq: 101 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 Timestamp: 1325030452 Contact: sip:5002@10.10.200.3:5060 Diversion: sip:3002@10.10.200.3;privacy=off;reason=no-answer;counter=1;screen=no Expires: 180 Allow-Events: telephone-event Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session;handling=required Content-Length: 267 v=0 o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 1283 3954 IN IP4 10.10.200.3 s=SIP Call c=IN IP4 10.10.200.3 t=0 0 m=audio 17098 RTP/AVP 18 101 c=IN IP4 10.10.200.3 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:20 Dec 28 00:00:52.612: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Media Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.200.3:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2AB55 From: HQ Phone 2 sip:5002@10.10.200.3;tag=4F3F96E8-171B To: sip:3600@10.10.202.1;tag=3003BC-1D3E Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:00:52 GMT Call-ID: D7867EA6-301D11E1-80CE8486-37477DE6@10.10.200.3 Timestamp: 1325030452 CSeq: 101 INVITE Allow-Events: telephone-event Warning: 304 10.10.202.1 Media Type(s) Unavailable Reason: Q.850;cause=65 Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x Content-Length: 0 Dec 28 00:00:52.628: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: ACK sip:3600@10.10.202.1:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.200.3:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2AB55 From: HQ Phone 2 sip:5002@10.10.200.3;tag=4F3F96E8-171B To: sip:3600@10.10.202.1;tag=3003BC-1D3E Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ANI Translation
You are correct. The route list translations will be used whereever the route list is used. You can assign translations to ANI using a Translation profile. Translation profiles match on called number, but allow manipulations to called or calling numbers. So your user's css points to the TP. It does manipluations in ANI and then uses its own css to send the call out the appropriate route pattern. Also, keep in mind if you send the calls out an h323 or SIP gateway, you can do the ANI translations in the outbound dialpeers. So, no cucm based manipulations might benecessary. Also, keep in mind you can use calling party transformations... Perhaps on the outbound gateway. Brian - Reply message - From: datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Dec 24, 2011 11:42 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ANI Translation To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hello, I am a little confused about the ANI translation. Imagine that we have several Route Patterns: 1. Local Calls Pattern 2. Long Distance Calls Pattern 3. International Calls Pattern Actual Pattern Strings does not matter. All Patterns point to the same Route List (there is only one Route List defined) Now if we want to provide different ANI based on the Called Number, we have to use the Route Pattern Translation options so that when the call goes through Local Calls Pattern, we can set ANI as X. But when the call goes through the Long Distance Calls Pattern we can set the ANI to Y And so on, for International Calls Pattern as well. As and I guess it is NOT POSSIBLE to use the Route List ANI Translation Options for ANI translation based on the Called Number, as all Patterns point to the same Route List, and Route List cannot differentiate which Route Pattern has been called initially. So it will Translate ANI for all calls, without differentiating which Pattern has been called. Am I right? Or I am missing something, and do not fully understand the Route Lists? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RFC2833 with MTP
I wonder if you sent it back through the Lo0 interface if it would work. - Reply message - From: Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Dec 17, 2011 6:16 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RFC2833 with MTP To: datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Ya .. Tested this and same result Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Dec 16, 2011, at 4:44 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: You are also experiencing the same for MTP on CUBE? On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com wrote: I look into it as well in my IOS to confirm the same ... Thx for sharing the info Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Dec 16, 2011, at 2:47 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: I have found out the following. The Router IOS MTP (Not DSP, well DSP also does support it) supports RFC2833, I have tested it and the RFC2833 from a SIP Trunk are translated succesfuly for UCCX IVR. But when the IOS or DSP MTPs are located on the same Router as the CUBE, then the MTP does not make RFC2833. As soon as I have moved MTP to other Router, Branch1 Router, the RFC2833 was succesfuly, the MTP did the Translation between RFC2833 and Out of Band DTMF., I think this is a BUG, because the same problem is observer of CCM modules when the MTP located on it and the solution is to move the MTP to ISR Routers. So bear in mind, that the RFC2833 may not work for MTP, when that MTP resource is located on the CUBE Router. On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:38 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: I see now. Great info. Also in that case, only DSP MTP and CUCM Software MTP can translate RFC2833 and that would be only for G711 calls, as CUCM and DSP MTPs support only G711, am I right? And if we want to use other codec for MTP and we have to configure the IOS MTP (max sessions software) which does not support RFC2833 in this case. Also the Transrating (different packetization period codec) is not supported on max-session software MTP, and we need to use either CUCM Software or DSP MTP, that support only G711. On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Mohammed Al Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com wrote: Ok since you are using MTP on gateway you need to make it as hardware MTP to do inband to OOB DTMF translation. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari From: datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 10:09 PM To: Mohd Baqari Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RFC2833 with MTP MTP is invoked, and the show sip-ua calls shows that the RFC2833 is used for both calls legs. Even the debug voip rtp session named-events shows that the DTMF tones are traversing. But the UCCX does not undertand them correclty. On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com wrote: Make sure that mtp is invoked during the call and verify the dtmf method used on both call legs using show call active voice command. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Dec 15, 2011, at 6:33 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a problem with MTP and RFC2833. When calling from BR2 CCME to UCCX at HQ Site through the SIP CUBE, which has RFC2833 as the DTMF method, the UCCX IVR does not understand the DTMF tones correctly when the Router IOS MTP is used on a SIP Trunk in CUCM. But as soon as I assing the CUCM Native Software MTP to use on a CUCM SIP Trunk, the RFC2833 DTMF digits are recognized correctly in UCCX. What do I mean under incorrect DTMF inderstanding, is that when the Caller at BR2 CUCME presses any digits in UCCX IVR, he is transferred to operator always, and it does not matter what digits he pressed. Until I chenge the Router IOS MTP to CUCM Native Software MTP, and then the BR2 Caller can press the digits and even transfer to required extension from UCCX IVR. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6
Trolls. Don't feed them and maybe they will go away. - Reply message - From: datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Nov 22, 2011 1:38 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6 To: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Can anybody explain me, what does the LAB 6 and etc means? Why people are mentioned LAB 3,4,5-6? On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Ken , All , Lets clarify all this in one shot to make it clear to everyone , First , This is a clear NDA violation on a public alias , can you please be more Professional ? Second , i have discussed this with someone else who came couple of months ago and said he got lab 5 and i finally i shared in the alias that those people is trying to do commercial to DOC they created themselves and called it Lab 5 or Lab 6 and they are trying to manipulate people under pressure and we agree that this is ridiculous and if anyone wanna share something to help he must chose his words and be professional , Now in regard of the DHCP i think this Question have been answered correctly in case you will get it in the lab , The CCIE Lab is not design to fit to the real implementations , its set to test the knowledge in certain areas no matter if its against the real life design or not , To answer Ken's Question , The CCM MTP is not capable to do G729 codec and so the HW MTP when you configure max session hardware under the dsp profile those 2 guys can do G711 only So if you have g729 Call and you want do EO call in the CCM version in the lab , you have to have SW IOS MTP register with the CCM and have Codec G729 under it dsp profile and make sure you have it in the MGR available to the SIP Trunk , Thanks Ash On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Peter Jeff peterjeff2...@yahoo.com wrot H a H a R eal life experience and ccie is 2 different thing so whoever is thinking and trying to match that it is stupidity I know 15 to 18 years real life experts fail lab but i know fresher pass it so next match it and whoever match it is stupidity From: Julien Krieger krieger.jul...@gmail.com To: Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Cc: Peter Jeff peterjeff2...@yahoo.com; Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:09 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6 Hi Randall, I agree with you don't want to go this road. Certainly Voice Lab is about doing many things you would never do in real life I guess that is why many of us get frustrated when they fail... :( Julien 2011/11/22 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Thanks Mark! The real question is why is a question like this in the CCIE Voice lab in the first place. Randall From: Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com To: Peter Jeff peterjeff2...@yahoo.com Cc: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:22 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6 The answer is in this document. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipaddr/configuration/guide/iad_dhcp_svr_cfg_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1117976 I tried it last night in my lab. Here is my config using the static instructions in that doc. ip dhcp pool SCDHCP origin file flash:SCDHCP option 150 ip 142.100.64.12 142.100.64.11 default-router 142.102.66.254 BR2-RTR# more flash:SCDHCP *time* Nov 21 2011 07:52 AM *version* 2 !IP addressTypeHardware address Lease expiration 142.102.66.21 /24 id 0100.1B54.951C.D9 Infinite 142.102.66.22 /24 id 0100.1AA1.93E0.F5 Infinite *end* BR2-RTR#sh cdp nei det Device ID: SEP001B54951CD9 Entry address(es): IP address: 142.102.66.21 ... Device ID: SEP001AA193E0F5 Entry address(es): IP address: 142.102.66.22 I created the SCDHCP doc in notepad. Uploaded it to CUCM, then TFTPed it to my router. Once the file is in flash the since dhcp pool looks up the static IPs in the file then assigns it to the appropriate phone. On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Peter Jeff peterjeff2...@yahoo.com wrote: The real question is why is a question like this in the CCIE From: Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com To: Peter Jeff peterjeff2...@yahoo.com Cc: Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:22 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab - 6 The answer is in this document. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipaddr/configuration/guide/iad_dhcp_svr_cfg_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1117976 I tried it last night in my lab. Here is my config using the static instructions
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST keepalive time
They need to apply QoS, especially on the WAN. There is no other solution -- only several options of bandages. What you need is to stop the bleeding. I doubt very highly that Cisco would support the configuration without QoS in place. 2mbps sounds like it could be an Ethernet handoff? If so, you'll need to shape the link down to 2mbps. I'd use a nested policy that applies an LLQ policy inside a shaping policy. Need to do the same on both sides. - Reply message - From: Emanuel Damasceno aedamasc...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Nov 8, 2011 8:18 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST keepalive time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Thanks for the replies. It didn't work. The customer has a centralized solution with 2 sites. His two sites use MGCP, but unfortunately his environment is a screwy solution. He has EVERYTHING on VLAN 1. I explained to him many times he needed to segregate his VLANs and use QoS for his WAN. But we have to work with this CRAPPY solution for the time being... This is what he needs (I'll try to be as specific as I can). His screwed up WAN link is a 2MBps (I highly doubt this) without any QoS applied (neither in his side or his SP). The link is very unstable and his phones on the remote site keeps coming back and forth from SRST. Since it keeps doing it for so long, the phones keep just being out of its service, because it registers, then there is a problem with the link and all his phones in the remote site tries to go to SRST mode, but then all of the sudden the link is back and the phones try to go back to CUCM. He was asking me to put a 12 hour (yes, who doesn't have a customer like this...) before the phones tried to connect with CUCM again. In other words, he wanted to let the phones in SRST mode for a few hours until he fixes his problem with the link. So, I tried the command ccm-manager switchback uptime-delay minutes, and we simulate a WAN outage. The phones entered SRST (well, at least he said it was. I am the remote support), but when he turned on the CUCM back, the phones registered right away. Even after setting the time for two hours. So, we went on Enterprise Parameters and changed the connection duration monitor but I didn't do it clusterwise. I did it on the device pool on the remote site. Now, the phones didn't register to SRST so none of the phones were making any calls or receiving it (that's why I wonder his SRST solution never worked in the first place). So I rolled back to the standard settings and I told him I'd study his solution and give him back an answer. Honestly, knowing what he has, I think this won't work, but can you guys give me any ideas? I appreciate it. *Antonio Emanuel Damasceno* CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCNP Voice, CCIE Voice (written) CompTIA Network+ On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Emanuel Damasceno aedamasc...@gmail.comwrote: Hello experts, I currently have a customer who has CUCMBE in his environment with SRST enabled. His voice gateway is over a WAN link, and the link is unstable. His phones keep registering back and forth, and now he wants to keep his phones in SRST mode for a little longer than usual. His configs are call-manager-fallback based (no CME as SRST)... How can I achieve this? Is it through CUCMBE or his CME? His gateway is MGCP. Thanks *Antonio Emanuel Damasceno* CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCNP Voice, CCIE Voice (written) CompTIA Network+ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM and UCCX - JTAPI issue
See if this helps. http://www.onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2009-February/057713.html Brian - Reply message - From: Duncan Hamilton-Walker dun...@rosethorn.plus.com Date: Sat, Nov 5, 2011 7:21 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM and UCCX - JTAPI issue To: 'Bill Lake' whl...@gmail.com Cc: 'CCIE Study' ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I don't know yet as i have just finished building the server for the next part of my studies.. but every time i launch the web interface and log in i get the same.. ? From: Bill Lake [mailto:whl...@gmail.com] Sent: 05 November 2011 23:40 To: Duncan Hamilton-Walker Cc: CCIE Study Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM and UCCX - JTAPI issue I believe this is a bug, does it work correctly if you continue or relaunch? On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Duncan Hamilton-Walker dun...@rosethorn.plus.com wrote: Dear All, Can anyone please shine some light on my problem message below; I have resync the JTAPI client a few times with the same result.. Cisco JTAPI Client An error has occurred while trying to resynchronize the Cisco JTAPI Client. Please try Cisco JTAPI Resync in Cisco Unified CCX Administration again. System versions below; Cisco Unified CM Administration System version: 7.1.5.33900-10 Cisco Application Administration - 7.0(1)SR05_Build504 Package: Cisco Unified CCX Premium Cluster: default Thanks D ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com _ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1869 / Virus Database: 2092/4598 - Release Date: 11/05/11 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [How to make an ISO from DVD's]
There must be a million ways to do this. Google is your friend. I like Infra Recorder, mainly because it is light and open source. http://infrarecorder.org - Reply message - From: michael.se...@compucom.com Date: Tue, Nov 1, 2011 6:37 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [How to make an ISO from DVD's] To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Greetings, I've got a set of CUCM CUWL Disks and I want to turn them into an .iso image so I can burn them to a VM. Any suggestions or knowledge share would be appreciated. -Thanks. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab PSTN phone woes
On the PSTN router, did you do create cnf-files under telephony service? - Reply message - From: Voiper datapack...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Sep 29, 2011 8:41 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab PSTN phone woes To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Ahoy one and all: I am a struggling voice aspirant. Got my home lab setup and started IPE volume I workbook. I have two 3550 switches, one for HQ and the other for BR1.My pstn phone is connected to the BR1-3550. The pstn configuration is similar to the IPE pstn config (Vol 1, lab4). I am able to ping all interfaces from my pstn router(2811). However, the pstn phone (7960) is not able to get any ip address; show 'registration rejected' message. Here are the things I undertook to try to resolve the issue: 1) verified the dhcp configuration was correct on the pstn router. ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.1 10.10.100.49 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.70 10.10.100.254 ! ip dhcp pool PSTN network 10.10.100.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.10.100.2 option 150 ip 10.10.100.2 2) Created Vlan for pstn on BR1-3550 BR1-3550#svb VLAN Name StatusPorts - --- 1default activeFa0/4, Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8, Fa0/9, Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12, Fa0/14, Fa0/15 Fa0/16, Fa0/17, Fa0/18, Fa0/19, Fa0/20, Fa0/21, Fa0/22, Fa0/24, Gi0/1, Gi0/2 10 DATA active 20 PHONES active 30 SERVERS active 100 PSTN activeFa0/13 130 BR1-DATA activeFa0/2, Fa0/3 240 BR1-PHONES activeFa0/2, Fa0/3 1002 fddi-default act/unsup 3) Configured port for pstn on BR1-3550 interface FastEthernet0/13 description Connected to PSTN phone switchport access vlan 100 -- (I also tried using access vlan 200 and voice vlan 400) switchport mode access 4) Also created interface vlan on BR1-3550, not sure if needed, was getting desperate :( interface Vlan100 ip address 10.10.100.2 255.255.255.0 5) Verified ephone configuration on pstn router. Correct mac-add ephone 1 device-security-mode none mac-address 0011.2189.C2A7 type 7960 button 1:1 2:2 3:3 4:4 button 5:5 6:6 5) Power cycled pstn phone. Factory reset 123456789*0#. 6) Connected the pstn phone to HQ so that it would get the tftp configuration from the Call Manager. Also tried to use option 150 to point to CUCM on the pstn router. I even changed the phone with another 7960. 7) Tried to download the 7960 load file on the pstn router, but was not successful as the pstn is not able to ping my Windows 7 desktop PSTN-WAN#dir flash: Directory of flash:/ 1 -rw-3395 Mar 17 2008 15:23:58 -04:00 bgp-config 2 -rw-5814 Mar 20 2008 16:27:56 -04:00 fr-config 3 -rw-1646 Feb 23 2006 00:31:02 -05:00 sdmconfig-2811.cfg 4 -rw- 812032 Feb 23 2006 00:32:00 -05:00 es.tar 5 -rw- 1007616 Feb 23 2006 00:32:28 -05:00 common.tar 6 -rw-1038 Feb 23 2006 00:32:50 -05:00 home.shtml 7 -rw- 113152 Feb 23 2006 00:33:10 -05:00 home.tar 8 -rw- 511939 Feb 23 2006 00:33:32 -05:00 128MB.sdf 9 -rw-59846440 Jul 20 2009 21:08:26 -04:00 c2800nm-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-24.T.bin As you see I ran out of options. I would be thankful for any suggestion. Best Voiper ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I Pass CCIE voice finally
Congrats Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Ahmed Ellboudy ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com Date: Fri, Sep 9, 2011 11:57 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I Pass CCIE voice finally To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com HI ALL , I Pass MY exam after 2nd attempt , finaly I did it my CCIE #30079 ,Thanks for IPX document it was a good documents for your preprations, Thanks, Ahmed Ellboudy, CCIE-voice # 30079 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] on behalf of Kshitij Singhi [martinian.ksin...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 3:43 PM To: Ken Wyan Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] clock summer-time Hi Ken, Whatever I had sent across in my email is verified. The theory is vast with respect to NTP and the rest of the time zone stuff, but the configuration which I had sent across works as required for the exam. The lab is a test of how much you know with respect to NTP etc, and not whether you are aware of the different time zones all over the world and the date when DST is active etc. For that, a Geography test would be more appropriate (and there is no way I would be taking THAT test again) ;) :) On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.commailto:kew...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Kshitiji, Earlier I also thought your same way after referring to cisco docs for NTP. But when we check time zones available in CUCM Date/Time groups ; some of the non-US locations have daylight saving times. Eg: North Asia East Standard / Daylight time ( GMT + 08:00 ). Therefore CUCM has pre-defined location based timezones ( DST for non US as well ). Routers don't have such pre-defined time zones. PST EST PDT are just labels only. if we put clock summer-time command clock goes one hour ahead during US DST period. Obviously DST start end dates differ in different locations in the world .(even same standard timezone can have different DST start end dates based on country ; then how does Router determine DST start end date from offset we configure in clock-timezone command?) Some previous posts suggested to match router time with phone time (CUCM time) by putting or not putting summer-time command (in Router - Trial error). But this will not help if we are outside Routers DST window , but inside CUCM DST window. Below cisco docs confirm that clock summer-time can be used for US without start end dates. Anybody has more verified details on this? Configure Summer Time (Daylight Savings Time) To configure summer time (daylight savings time) in areas where it starts and ends on a particular day of the week each year, use the following command in global configuration mode: Command Purpose clock summer-time zone recurring [week day month hh:mm week day month hh:mm [offset]] Configure summer time. If summer time in your area does not follow this pattern, you can configure the exact date and time of the next summer time events by using one of the following commands in global configuration mode: Command Purpose clock summer-time zone date month date year hh:mm month date year hh:mm [offset] or clock summer-time zone date date month year hh:mm date month year hh:mm [offset] Configure summer time. For an example of configuring summer time, see the section Clock, Calendar, and NTP Configuration Exampleshttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0/configfun/configuration/guide/fcgenral.html#wp4739 at the end of this chapter. Clock, Calendar, and NTP Configuration Examples In the following example, a router with a system calendar has server associations with two other systems, transmits broadcast NTP packets, periodically updates the calendar, and redistributes time into VINES: clock timezone PST -8 clock summer-time PDT recurring ntp update-calendar ntp server 192.168.13.57 ntp server 192.168.11.58 interface Ethernet 0/0 ntp broadcast vines time use-system On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Kshitij Singhi martinian.ksin...@gmail.commailto:martinian.ksin...@gmail.com wrote: Here is what needs to be done: Use clock summer-time TIMEZONE offset from GMT Hence, as an example, for PST/CST/EST it will be: PST - - - clock time-zone PST -8 CST - - - clock time-zone CST -6 EST - - - clock time-zone EST -5 For ALL US sites, set the Daylight Savings to recurring. Hence, continuing from the above: PST - - - clock summer-time PDT recurring CST - - - clock summer-time CDT recurring EST - - -clock summer-time EDT recurring Don't worry about the actual date for DST. Just make sure that you choose a Date/Time Group on CUCM which has Daylight Savings Time along with the appropriate time zone. Also, try to ensure that the phones and the local routers have the same time. For all non-US sites, there is no need to set DST. Just set the clock time-zone command.
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Do not feed the trolls
Remember. Don't feed the trolls.___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Agent in ready state after login
Did you try setting it in Desktop Administrator? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Wael Agina waelag...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Aug 20, 2011 6:20 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Agent in ready state after login To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Dears, Any one tried before to get ipccc agents in the ready state after login . Normally agents went to Not Ready state and have to manually change it to ready after they login from the service button. I tried a lot in my home lab, but always agents login in Not Ready state. Any idea ? -- Thanks and Best Regards, Wael Agina ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 4-port HWIC-ESW - Phone can't power-on
Do you have a POE power supply in the router? - Reply message - From: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Aug 19, 2011 8:25 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 4-port HWIC-ESW - Phone can't power-on To: Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com what is the output of the following command #show power inline On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I have cisco 2821 router and 4-port HWIC-WSP PoE card. Ip phone connected to one of the port on switch module but it is unable to power on. Here is module information: Router#sh inv | inc 4 NAME: 4 Port FE Switch on Slot 0 SubSlot 0, DESCR: 4 Port FE Switch PID: HWIC-4ESW , VID: V01 , SN: FOC122434S2 NAME: WIC/VIC/HWIC 0 Power Daughter Card, DESCR: 4-Port HWIC-ESW Power Daughter Card PID: ILPM-4, VID: V01 , SN: FOC122710SV Can you someone please share your configure of your router for comparison. Thanks, Ramcharan Arya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FXO lines !
CME doesn't have css/partitions... instead, use COR. Now, how exactly is this a ccie lab exam study question? There are no FXO ports on the lab exam. - Reply message - From: Shabeeb Mohammed shabeebc...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Aug 6, 2011 9:40 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FXO lines ! To: Cisco Voip cisco_new...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com configure 2 different line to use the 2 fxo line separately... i mean each fxo line will be under separate partition and css... On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Cisco Voip cisco_new...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all. I am using cisco 2801 with 2 fxo cards. Running CME version 7. I am using 7940 phone. Now is there anyway that when the user of 7940 press line 1, he gets FXO line 1, and when he press 2 he gets FXO line 2. Is this possible or do i need to define outside access code for both these lines ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST voice mail
Build a did and use call routing rule for subscriber sign in, as opposed to attempt sign in. Srst voicemail points to the DID. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Victor Malyuga victor_maly...@yahoo.com Date: Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:21 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST voice mail To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Suppose phones need to access voice mail in SRST mode and hear subscriber sign-in greetings when dial VM directly. VM located in a central site. We can not use alternate extension in VM. I can use EPNM and calling party transformation mask on VM Hunt Pilot to get this functionality. However, if there is a requirement to play PSTN caller ANI in new messages, the transformation mask will cut the PSTN ANI to 4 digits. How to overcome that? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [CME-DHCP PROBLEM]
Can you wipe the phone? Seems to be holding into an old ip address. - Reply message - From: CCIEVoiceKP ccievoic...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Jul 30, 2011 3:29 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [CME-DHCP PROBLEM] To: michael.se...@compucom.com michael.se...@compucom.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, michael.se...@compucom.com michael.se...@compucom.com Do a sh ip dhcp bind and see if your phones have IPs ... Then check the IP of your option 150 ... Is the 201 subnet correct? Kevin Prater 907.301.6519 Sent from my iPhone and I have big thumbs ... So please excuse the typos. On Jul 30, 2011, at 11:22 AM, michael.se...@compucom.com wrote: REQUESTED CONFIGURATION: Assign host addresses for the CME site starting at .50 and ranging to .69? Configuration: ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254 ip dhcp pool VOICE network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.10.202.1 option 150 ip 10.10.201.1 PHONES WON’T REGISTER: DEBUG: BR2-RTR# Jul 30 19:05:53.918: DHCPD: Sending notification of DISCOVER: Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 001b.d4c6.16a0 Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: remote id 020a0a0aca0103000190 Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: circuit id Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: Seeing if there is an internally specified pool class: Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 001b.d4c6.16a0 Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: remote id 020a0a0aca0103000190 Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: circuit id Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: subnet [10.10.202.1,10.10.202.254 in address pool VOICE is empty. Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: Sending notification of ASSIGNMENT FAILURE: When I change the configuration to the following everything works but it doesn’t meet the requirements: Configuration: ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.10 ip dhcp pool VOICE network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.10.202.1 option 150 ip 10.10.201.1 Any input would be appreciated, I think it’s a bug, but haven’t done a scrub yet because I’m in the middle of doing a lab. Michael Sears CompuCom US West, Professional Services Senior IPT Engineer Office:+1 720.344.6833 Mobile: +1 303.328.5590 Fax:+1 978.863.0740 Conf: +1 866-389-9494 #6159225 Host Code: 879 7896 E-Mail: michael.se...@compucom.com Web: http://www.compucom.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [CME-DHCP PROBLEM]
Seriously, forget it. Who cares? Move on. Your config was good. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Леонид Архипов leoni...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Jul 30, 2011 7:39 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [CME-DHCP PROBLEM] To: michael.se...@compucom.com michael.se...@compucom.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, michael.se...@compucom.com michael.se...@compucom.com In this case dhcp_srv has compiled excluded ranges producing a contiguous range. It's seen in the penultimate debug message. I'm new in this community, so greetings to all. Отправлено с iPhone 31.07.2011, в 6:22, michael.se...@compucom.com написал(а): REQUESTED CONFIGURATION: Assign host addresses for the CME site starting at .50 and ranging to .69? Configuration: ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254 ip dhcp pool VOICE network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.10.202.1 option 150 ip 10.10.201.1 PHONES WON’T REGISTER: DEBUG: BR2-RTR# Jul 30 19:05:53.918: DHCPD: Sending notification of DISCOVER: Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 001b.d4c6.16a0 Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: remote id 020a0a0aca0103000190 Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: circuit id Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: Seeing if there is an internally specified pool class: Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 001b.d4c6.16a0 Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: remote id 020a0a0aca0103000190 Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: circuit id Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: subnet [10.10.202.1,10.10.202.254 in address pool VOICE is empty. Jul 30 19:05:53.922: DHCPD: Sending notification of ASSIGNMENT FAILURE: When I change the configuration to the following everything works but it doesn’t meet the requirements: Configuration: ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.10 ip dhcp pool VOICE network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.10.202.1 option 150 ip 10.10.201.1 Any input would be appreciated, I think it’s a bug, but haven’t done a scrub yet because I’m in the middle of doing a lab. Michael Sears CompuCom US West, Professional Services Senior IPT Engineer Office:+1 720.344.6833 Mobile: +1 303.328.5590 Fax:+1 978.863.0740 Conf: +1 866-389-9494 #6159225 Host Code: 879 7896 E-Mail: michael.se...@compucom.com Web: http://www.compucom.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
Or if the port is physically down... like not plugged in. - Reply message - From: Shabeeb Mohammed shabeebc...@gmail.com Date: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 9:19 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind) To: Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com The only reasons for MGCP to not register with the CUCM are - a. Hostname mismatch b. Domain Mismatch c. cucm in not binded to the serial interface.. regards shabeeb On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote: have you got it registers with the CCM before on any of your VM spanshots ? i faced this issue before and it only fixed when i have reverted the ccm snapshot to older one Thanks Ash On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:35 AM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: No matter what I do I cannot get the MGCP gateway to show as registered in CUCM 7.02. I think I have configured up the gateway in CUCM correctly. I cut and paste the router name from the sh ccm-m and the card is configured in slot 0 (aim-voice-30 (2 subunits) subunit 1 vwic-2mft-E1 0/0. After all the config is done I apply the no mgcp/mgcp command. I can see from the DNA that the dialled number is correctly routed to the MGCP gateway but a sh isdn q931 shows no output - ie the call never gets there. I aslo tried restarting the ris data collector and CM service on both pub and Sub to see if this was just mis represented in the GUI. When I reload the router the L2 isdn status goes back to TEI assigned until I remove the isdn bind-l3 from the loopback restart mgcp and then add it back in again. Here is the sh run Current configuration : 2717 bytes ! ! No configuration change since last restart ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname BR1-RTR ! boot-start-marker boot system flash:c2600-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-15.T14.bin boot-end-marker ! enable secret 5 $1$LaQO$FR59LroSkjvjxYkzDsZ1N/ ! no aaa new-model clock timezone AEST 9 clock summer-time AEST recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00 network-clock-participate wic 1 network-clock-select 1 E1 0/1 voice-card 0 dspfarm no local-bypass ! ip cef ! ! ! ! ip domain name smlab.com ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! controller E1 0/1 pri-group timeslots 1-6,16 service mgcp ! controller E1 0/2 ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 description management ip address ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/0.130 description data vlan to switch encapsulation dot1Q 130 native ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 description br1 voice vlan encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0 snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/1:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! router eigrp 1 network 10.0.0.0 no auto-summary ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ! no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! voice-port 0/1:15 ! ccm-manager switchback immediate ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10 ccm-manager mgcp ! mgcp mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1 mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band mgcp bind control source-interface Loopback0 mgcp bind media source-interface Loopback0 ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet line vty 5 15 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet ! ntp clock-period 17207966 ntp server 10.10.___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
CUCM does not support fractional PRIs in MGCP officially. - Reply message - From: steven moran smoran...@gmail.com Date: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 8:45 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind) To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Dear all, thanks for all of the suggestions. I have removed the gateway from CM and restarted the Pub abd Sub servers from the CLI (utils system restart) I removed the mgcp bind media and control from the loopback interface and reloaded the BR1_RTR (after saving). This results in the gateway binding to the 1st BR1 serial int 10.10.111.2. I am curious as to why the logs show that the mgcp tries to bin to the full PRI even though the pri-group specifies that it should only bind to channels 1-6 fro mgcp. Does the 2651xm router support fractional pri bind for mgcp? Here is the config BR1-RTR(config)#do sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 2653 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 07:53:31 AEST Mon Jul 18 2011 ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname BR1-RTR ! boot-start-marker boot system flash:c2600-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-15.T14.bin boot-end-marker ! enable secret 5 $1$LaQO$FR59LroSkjvjxYkzDsZ1N/ ! no aaa new-model clock timezone AEST 9 clock summer-time AEST recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00 network-clock-participate wic 1 network-clock-select 1 E1 0/1 voice-card 0 dspfarm no local-bypass ! ip cef ! ! ! ! ip domain name lab.com ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! controller E1 0/1 pri-group timeslots 1-6,16 service mgcp ! controller E1 0/2 shutdown ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 description management ip address ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/0.130 description data vlan to switch encapsulation dot1Q 130 native ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 description br1 voice vlan encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0 snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/1:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! router eigrp 1 network 10.0.0.0 no auto-summary ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ! no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! voice-port 0/1:15 ! ccm-manager switchback immediate ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10 ccm-manager mgcp ! mgcp mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1 mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet line vty 5 15 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet ! ntp clock-period 17207971 ntp server 10.10.100.2 ! end Here is the sh isdn stat BR1-RTR(config)#do sh isdn stat Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5 %Q.931 is backhauled to CCM MANAGER 0x0003 on DSL 0. Layer 3 output may not apply ISDN Serial0/1:15 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5 L2 Protocol = Q.921 0x L3 Protocol(s) = CCM MANAGER 0x0003 Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 0, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0 The Free Channel Mask: 0x803F Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 1 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0 BR1-RTR(config)# Here is the sh ccm MGCP Domain Name: BR1-RTR.lab.com PriorityStatus Host Primary Registered 10.10.210.11 First BackupBackup Ready 10.10.210.10 Second Backup None Current active Call Manager:10.10.210.11 Backhaul/Redundant link port: 2428 Failover Interval: 30 seconds Keepalive Interval: 15 seconds Last keepalive sent:10:24:58 AEST Jul 18 2011 (elapsed time: 00:00:08) Last MGCP traffic time: 10:24:58 AEST Jul 18 2011 (elapsed time: 00:00:08) Last failover time: 10:11:26 AEST Jul 18 2011 from (10.10.210.11) Last switchback
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unicode support in CUCM
You are looking for locales. - Reply message - From: Ravindra Lakpriya lakpr...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Jul 12, 2011 7:11 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unicode support in CUCM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Guy first of all my apologies... even though my CCIE lab date is 20 days away from today...But this question is something related to work :D I wonder any of you came across a situation where you have to configure display name and line text lable in other languages. I believe for that we use uni code. I can use unicode in the admin pages. But still at the phone level it will display as junk character. If you have any experience on that please share. really appreciated. -- Ravindra Lakpriya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN-WAN Enable Password
Disabling password recovery does NOT mean you cannot recover the router. It means if you recover the router, you will lose the config. Recover the router. Then put your config back on it. Then change the password to something you know. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Bryan Byrne ccie.25...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Jul 4, 2011 11:31 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN-WAN Enable Password To: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com It's in the default config. I didn't catch it until after I put it in the router. On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Bill Lake wrote: Did you disable password recovery? On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Bryan Byrne ccie.25...@gmail.com wrote: I'm in the process of finishing out a home lab build and I ran into a small problem with the PSTN-WAN router. I forgot to remove the enable password when I pasted in the config and I am not running the right version of ROMMON that will let me do a factory reset of the router. Does anyone happen to know the enable secret for the PSTN-WAN router? -Bryan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab result status
Maybe your proctor is on summer vacation. - Reply message - From: Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Jun 23, 2011 6:44 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab result status To: Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com One week no result. This is too long. Has anyone read any fine print which specifies within what timeframe they will be providing result? -adil On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com wrote: I just sent her an email. Let's see who it goes. -Pablo Meneses. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:38 AM, William Affeldt william.affe...@yahoo.com wrote: Her name is Kathe Saccenti. I would just call Support and ask to talk to her. She is in charge of the proctors and the testing environment. --- On *Thu, 6/23/11, Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com* wrote: From: Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab result status To: William Affeldt william.affe...@yahoo.com Cc: George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011, 4:23 PM Hello Bill, Thanks for that information. Do you know Kathe's last name? Regards. -Pablo Meneses. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:09 PM, William Affeldt william.affe...@yahoo.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=william.affe...@yahoo.com wrote: You should look at this as a positive. If they deleted your test they may just give you a passing grade. You will never know though. The person you should contact is the lab ops manager. Her name is Kathe. She is a nice person and will take your call at any time. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 22, 2011, at 4:56 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gogli...@gmail.com wrote: WTF man, I can't believe this is happening to you. I wouldn't be able to sleep until I got the results. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Pablo Meneses http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com pmenese...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com wrote: Can you believe that I haven't received the answer yet! This has been the longest wait ever. I even opened a ticket with Cert Support and so far I have just received templates. Does someone else have gone through this? I'm starting to think that they messed up on my exam. -Pablo Meneses. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Julien Krieger http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=krieger.jul...@gmail.com krieger.jul...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=krieger.jul...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pablo, How did it go? Have you passed? 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com pmenese...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com Thanks Cris. Looking forward to getting my result. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Cristobal Priego http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cristobalpri...@gmail.com cristobalpri...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: i know man i took my last attempt on a Friday as well In San Jose i didn't get my score until next Monday at 14:45 PST 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com pmenese...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com Hopefully that's true. Longest wait EVER!!! -Pablo Meneses. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Cristobal Priego http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cristobalpri...@gmail.com cristobalpri...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: you will get today, wait 2.5 more hours that's what happens when you take it on Friday 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com pmenese...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com Hi experts, I am wondering how long it takes for you to received your score report this days. I've taken my lab last Friday and I have NOT received the answer yet. Yesterday I logged to the CCIE Online Tool and it said HOLD on the PASS/FAIL field, does someone know what that means? Has someone else gone through this? I will look forward to your reply as I figure most of you understand the feeling of not having the answer. Regards. -Pablo Meneses. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.com/www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.platinumplacement.com/www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need vouchers
Looking for $20 each. - Reply message - From: adam compton com...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Jun 20, 2011 3:06 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need vouchers To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com If you have any extra vouchers you need to get rid of let me know. I'm looking for 10. Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OT: MeetingPlace Express
www.cisco.com/tac - Reply message - From: George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Jun 9, 2011 12:39 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OT: MeetingPlace Express To: CCIE Voice online groupstudy ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi all, Cisco has announced MeetingPlace Express will be in the labs, starting NOW! Don't panick guys, MeetingPlace Express is not in a lab :) This is an OT, so feel free to ignore. Unless of course you think you can help. I had to change the domain name, on MeetingPlace Express 7.0 server, did the following: 1) sudo mpx_sys stop 2) net option 4 - change to new domain name 3) save 4) /sbin/shutdown -r now The server is back up, and I can access the web interface, and schedule a meeting. But I can't join the web conference. I ran the Browser Test and it gives me the following error: -- Player: Version: 10 Revision: 102 Platform: WIN Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Express Add-In: Installed App Server Connection: Successful Flash Com Connection: Timed Out server: rtmp:// CLN-MPX02.myserver.com:1935/?rtmp://localhost:1935,rtmp://CLN-MPX02. myserver.com:80/?rtmp://localhost:1935/,rtmpt://CLN-MPX02. myserver.com:80/?rtmp://localhost:1935/ -- The problem is, the myserver.com domain, is OLD domain, that I changed. and I do not understand why is it still trying to connect to old domain name? When I do net - list current configuration... the new domain is listed correctly. Many thanks to all for helping, ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I just got my Fail result
Your score reports are protected by the NDA agreement. Obviously so are the test questions. Stop breaking NDA. - Reply message - From: Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Jun 8, 2011 12:11 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I just got my Fail result To: Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, Chris Green voice5...@yahoo.com Customized prompt was required. Thus I recorded my prompt. Set agent to not ready as required. For CSQ, there's no specific requirement. Thus I created my own CSQ. I'm pretty familiar with UCCX. I can do whatever they ask me to do. I just need to understand their grading philosophy so I don't miss the trivial things and lose the whole portion. Michael On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe you missed out some requirement? Such as they want you to use system recording but you recorded your own? They want you to set agent to not ready after the call ended? Set the agent to work state after the call ended? Queue the call to special CSQ, etc etc. UCCX is a nightmare.! On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote: I meant - I've done everything right in UCCX. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote: I also got my report. That's very confusing to me as well. For example, I'm pretty sure I made a mistake on QoS. But I got 100%. Then I'm pretty sure I've don't everything right in UCCX but got 38%. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote: I know what you mean. I thought I nailed QOS 100% and got a zero. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Chris Green voice5...@yahoo.comwrote: Hi All, I just got my fail result, and what it shocked me is the Call Routing mark for 40% while I am sure I done what was asked for and I tested as well. I also got 100% in 4 different section but what it killed me is Call Routing which I was quite confident about that section :( Chris ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCME/CUE
Make sure vlan 400 is up/up. If not, that would do it. Hth - Reply message - From: Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Date: Sun, May 29, 2011 5:07 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCME/CUE To: Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com HI, I'm having a weird issue. (see snipits below) I configured mt CME for CUE(not telephony-service yet) and I cannot ser ser 0/0 ses to it I can ping 10.10.202.2 from hq rtr The cli just has a blank like Anyone have an ideas or run into this? Thanks, Randall interface Service-Engine0/0 ip unnumbered Vlan400 service-module ip address 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.0 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1 ip route 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.255 Service-Engine0/0 interface Vlan400 ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab strategy
Emin, You will not have to guess at what they want you to do. The instructions will be pretty clear as to what will earn you points. Doing things that aren't asked for will not help you, unless they are required for you to accomplish the task that is asked of you. For example, if a question asks you to build a call handler in CUC, you obviously will have to build a port group. Don't think they care about time of day routing or time zones if the question doesn't ask for it. Does that make sense? If you are unclear about what a question is asking you to do, you should ask the proctor. That is why they are there. Best of luck on your attempt. - Reply message - From: Emin Guliyev eguli...@fidelus.com Date: Fri, May 20, 2011 1:23 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab strategy To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hey guys, I will be going for my 1st attempt this month. Wanted to verify some minor details. Are we supposed to configure correct cadence/locale on endpoints and gateways? Also, do you lose any points for mismatching timezones on UC mailboxes? For afterhours mailbox, are we supposed to use schedules on UC and use Closed greeting , or just add a new call handler or subscriber? Regards, Emin ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem with Time on CME
7940/60 phones use the router's time. The newer phones obey the timezone command under telephony service. HTH Brian - Reply message - From: George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com Date: Mon, May 9, 2011 7:36 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem with Time on CME To: Abel ... midga...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Put the configs here... I don't know about 7965 but CIPC gets it's time from computer I think, therefore you can't provide time for CIPC from a router. For 7965 you need to have correct timezone set in telephony-service... timezone number And then create cnf is mandatory, otherwise it doesn't do it straight away. And if it's SIP try setting time-zone and ntp server too under voice register global SIP phones get time from ntp server directly, so you should provide one for it. Regards, Sent from my iPad On 10 May 2011, at 00:03, Abel ... midga...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm having this stange issue with CME 7.0.1, the router is getting correct time from NTP and some phones are getting the right time from the CME (7940) and other don't (7965 and CIPC), if someone know how solve this issue, please let me know. Thanks Abel... ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem with Time on CME
Is ny -4 the same as timezone 14? Can't remember. Is the ntp in synch on the router? Show ntp status Show clock - Reply message - From: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com Date: Mon, May 9, 2011 7:50 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem with Time on CME To: Abel ... midga...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX issues in Proctor labs with hardware vpn
You might need to review logs from the rmcm subsystem. I discovered a bug in 5.0 where a database change of skill wouldn't impact rmcm after a nic failure. You could be running into the same bug. Not sure if it was docs in 7.0. A reboot or reset of the node was required to reset the rmcm. Do you have a minimum skill level set in the queue? Agents are more skilled than minimum? Brian - Reply message - From: CCIE for Me cciefo...@hotmail.com Date: Sun, May 8, 2011 1:58 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX issues in Proctor labs with hardware vpn To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi all, just trying to eliminate some possibilities. Recently I have been having issues with uccx recognizing the ready status of agents. I do this all the time for my job and in the boot camp with no issues and am confident everything is set up correctly. The only difference I see is that I am using hardware vpn to join Proctor Labs and thinking everything in between (VPN tunnell, etc) may be preventing calls from routing properly to agents, or the VM images are screwy. I can log in to the agents fine, change my status, etc. If I do a CSQ with a resource group, calls route fine. If I change the same CSQ to resource/skill based, calls won't route. Any thoughts or suggestions? thanks for your time___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco has identified multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Communications Manager.
This is not an uncommon occurance. - Reply message - From: George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com Date: Thu, May 5, 2011 6:09 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco has identified multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Communications Manager. To: mihal caro mihalc...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Thanks for sharing Mihal... I wonder who exposed these vulnerabilities... If it were Cisco itself, I bet they wouldn't have announced it... :) Regards, On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:02 AM, mihal caro mihalc...@gmail.com wrote: *Hi All * ** *Just to let you know that **Cisco has identified multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Communications Manager. The vulnerabilities include a SIP DoS vulnerability, Directory Transversal Vulnerability, and a SQL Injection vulnerability.* * * The vulnerability is documented at the following address: * http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b79904.shtml * ** *regards.* ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sh run for router
show run all - Reply message - From: Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com Date: Tue, Apr 19, 2011 12:46 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sh run for router To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com hi all, does anyone know what is the sh run ' command to see any hidden config that not show up in usual sh run , like : sh run all or whatever / tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE to use loopback IP
Your loopback should have a 32 bit mask. Your static route isn't active because the connected route has a lower administrative distance. - Reply message - From: Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Apr 18, 2011 12:31 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE to use loopback IP To: Wilson Bolanos wbola...@pvt.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com You are right Wilson, it's only needed on the Loopback interface. On 18 April 2011 19:25, Wilson Bolanos wbola...@pvt.com wrote: Just for giggles wr the config and then reboot. The Design guide for CUE does not show putting the ip ospf network point-to-point on the interface Service-Engine0/0 from what I saw. Is the Design guide incorrect? *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *romain mullier *Sent:* Monday, April 18, 2011 9:58 AM *To:* Rogers Ochieng *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE to use loopback IP Tried that too. that still does not do it. interface Loopback1 ip address 10.10.222.1 255.255.255.252 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface Service-Engine0/0 ip unnumbered Loopback1 ip ospf network point-to-point service-module ip address 10.10.222.2 255.255.255.252 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.222.1 ! ip route 10.10.222.2 255.255.255.255 Service-Engine0/0 Still can't ping for the router iself. BR2-RTR#ping 10.10.222.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.222.2, timeout is 2 seconds: . It has got to be something specific to loopbacks be cause when I use the vlan interface it works right away. On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com wrote: You need ip ospf network point-to-point on the int service-engine 0/0 too On 18 April 2011 18:11, romain mullier romain.mull...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, So instead of using a vlan interface to bind the CUE module on BR2, I tried to use a loopback and for some reason I cannot ping the module. config below. (it works fine with a vlan or ethernet interface) interface Loopback1 ip address 10.10.222.1 255.255.255.252 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface Service-Engine0/0 ip unnumbered Loopback1 service-module ip address 10.10.222.2 255.255.255.252 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.222.1 ! ip route 10.10.222.2 255.255.255.255 Service-Engine0/0 ! BR2-RTR#ping 10.10.222.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.222.2, timeout is 2 seconds: ... Any thoughts? Thx ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and Looking for a Job – check out www.PlatinumPlacement.co http://www.platinumplacement.co/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and Looking for a Job check out www.PlatinumPlacement.co
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script (Redirect call based on the calling number)
I believe uccx does not understand the + symbol. - Reply message - From: Naoufal Kerboute naou...@mhdinfotech.com Date: Sun, Apr 10, 2011 7:21 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script (Redirect call based on the calling number) To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Dear gents, I'm working on UCCX section and I'm trying to reroute some calls coming from Spain (+34) to a specific extension. I've setup the script and it's working only if I set the calling number variable to full Spain PSTN number, but let take the case for many number from Spain. How can I reroute calls coming from spain to a specific extension (I don't want to much the full muber, I want to much only calling number start with +34) Any ideas? Thanks a lot Naoufal * * This Communication is Private Confidential. This message and any attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. * * It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or * * use this message any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachments from your system. * * ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state TCP_CONN_ERROR
Possibly a replication issue?... is ccm3 the Pub? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Shrini linuxbos...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Mar 29, 2011 12:44 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state TCP_CONN_ERROR To: Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Try this. voice card x no dspfarm dsp services dspfarm copy the sccp config delete all and paste again. It will fix your issue Thanks Shrini On 3/29/2011 8:32 AM, Rahul Kapor wrote: Hi All, I did reset , reload , no sccp , sccp but did not help. DIf f conf bridge from diff router can be registered with CUCM so looks like , PVDM has gone into hung state. Is there any way to reset the PVDM ? th, Rahul On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com mailto:rogersochi...@gmail.com wrote: Since i think this is CUCM with SRST scenario. Try this sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0 sccp ccm 14.160.115.200 identifier 1 version 7.0 sccp ccm 14.160.116.40 identifier 2 version 7.0 sccp ccm 14.160.110.22 identifier 3 version 7.0 sccp sccp ccm group 1 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate ccm 2 priority 2 associate ccm 3 priority 3 associate profile 1 register BR1-CONF dspfarm profile 1 conference codec g711ulaw codec g729r8 maximum sessions 1 conference-join custom-cptone join conference-leave custom-cptone leave associate application SCCP ! telephony-service sdspfarm units 1 sdspfarm tag 1 BR1-CONF conference hardware ephone-dn 10 octo-line number B conference meet-me no huntstop On 29 March 2011 14:31, Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.com mailto:rahul.kapo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All , thanks for replying. here is my sccp config sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0 sccp ccm 14.160.115.200 identifier 1 version 7.0 sccp ccm 14.160.116.40 identifier 2 version 7.0 sccp ccm 14.160.110.22 identifier 3 version 7.0 sccp sccp ccm group 1 associate ccm 3 priority 1 associate profile 1 register BR1-CONF dspfarm profile 1 conference codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 codec g729r8 codec g729br8 maximum sessions 1 conference-join custom-cptone join conference-leave custom-cptone leave associate application SCCP ! I am adding Hardware conf in CUCM as BR1-CONF but status is unknown-unknown. sh sccp SCCP Admin State: UP Gateway Local Interface: GigabitEthernet0/0 IPv4 Address: 14.160.110.35 Port Number: 2000 IP Precedence: 5 User Masked Codec list: None Call Manager: 14.160.115.200, Port Number: 2000 Priority: N/A, Version: 7.0, Identifier: 1 Trustpoint: N/A Call Manager: 14.160.116.40, Port Number: 2000 Priority: N/A, Version: 7.0, Identifier: 2 Trustpoint: N/A Call Manager: 14.160.110.22, Port Number: 2000 Priority: N/A, Version: 7.0, Identifier: 3 Trustpoint: N/A Conferencing Oper State: ACTIVE_IN_PROGRESS - Cause Code: TCP_CONN_ERROR Active Call Manager: NONE TCP Link Status: CONNECT_PENDING, Profile Identifier: 1 Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0 Supported Codec: g711ulaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: g711alaw, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: g729ar8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60 Supported Codec: g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60 Supported Codec: g729r8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60 Supported Codec: g729br8, Maximum Packetization Period: 60 Supported Codec: rfc2833 dtmf, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: rfc2833 pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 Supported Codec: inband-dtmf to rfc2833 conversion, Maximum Packetization Period: 30 reloaded the router again but no help. thx, Rahul On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com mailto:rogersochi...@gmail.com wrote: Your sccp and telephony service config will help On 28 March 2011 18:57, Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.com mailto:rahul.kapo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all , I am trying to register my hardware conference to cucm/cme but it is stuck in TCP_CONN_ERROR error state. sh sccp
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] encapsulation frame-relay cisco?
Try just encapsulation frame-relay... the default is Cisco. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Mar 26, 2011 1:27 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] encapsulation frame-relay cisco? To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I'm running ISO 12.4(24)T4. When I tried to configure Auto QoS under the frame-relay DLCI, I got the complain that the sub-interface encapsulation type was not Cisco. But I don't see cisco as an option while configuring encapsulation. Only ietf and MFR are available. Can anyone help? R1(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay ? MFR Multilink Frame Relay bundle interface ietf Use RFC1490/RFC2427 encapsulation cr Thanks! Michael ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : BUG ????? QoS with MLP LFI
Are you using frts or mqc based shaping? I believe I saw this behaviour when trying to use mqc based shaping. - Reply message - From: Ilya Rubinchik ilya.rubinc...@followmars.com Date: Thu, Feb 24, 2011 12:16 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : BUG ? QoS with MLP LFI To: Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu, ShinGei Yong shingei.y...@gmail.com, mihal caro mihalc...@gmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Thanks for clarification, will try it today. But you mean, that MPL, which is very common technology in the RL, just cannot come-up automagically after router reboots? It sounds strange. ☺ -- Best regards, Ilya Rubinchik Chief UC Engineer Mars Solutions Ltd. Skype: im_citius Mob: +998 (97) 712-8456 Office: +998 (71) 290-7364 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Friderich Claude Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:28 AM To: ShinGei Yong; mihal caro; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : BUG ? QoS with MLP LFI Guys, My Lab is 100 percent Cisco guarantee After making more tests, I can confirm that : If I only reboot a couple of times BR2 router, virtual access becomes up after each reboot But rebooting a couple of times HQ router, the virtual access is going to be down after each reboot Conclusion: On HQ, Just have to put the command line no frame-relay interface-dlci 202 ppp Virtual-Template100 and shut the Serial interface 0/1/0 and put the command frame-relay interface-dlci 202 ppp Virtual-Template100 and no shut to make it work again Hope this can help you during the real lab … Think it’s the easiest solution to make it work …. Have to keep this in mind ☺ And again, thanks to all for your remarks and suggestions Regards Claude. Claude Friderich PreSales Support [ccvp_voice_sm] NETCORE PSF S.A. 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: 31 33 80-407 Fax: 31 33 80 8-407 GSM: 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lumailto:cfrider...@netcore.lu From: ShinGei Yong [mailto:shingei.y...@gmail.com] Sent: mercredi 23 février 2011 06:40 To: mihal caro; Friderich Claude; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : BUG ? QoS with MLP LFI Hi Caro, So what you're trying to said is that,this MLP LFI issue could be potentially caused by the non-genuine WIC instead of an IOS bugs? shingei On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:22 AM, mihal caro mihalc...@gmail.commailto:mihalc...@gmail.com wrote: The interfaces 90% of the WIC-1T interfaces that are on ebay are fake they don't come from Cisco but from china cloned.So maybe you are working on a fake ones. I have Cisco WIC-1T original and they all work after reboot. regards On 22 February 2011 17:19, Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lumailto:cfrider...@netcore.lu wrote: Hi Caro, What do you mean by Cisco Original ? Regards Claude Claude Friderich PreSales Support [ccvp_voice_sm] NETCORE PSF S.A. 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: 31 33 80-407 Fax: 31 33 80 8-407 GSM: 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lumailto:cfrider...@netcore.lu From: mihal caro [mailto:mihalc...@gmail.commailto:mihalc...@gmail.com] Sent: mardi 22 février 2011 12:00 To: Stutz, Bernhard Cc: Friderich Claude; Ilya Rubinchik; Miron Kobelski; Roger Källberg; ccieid...@gmail.commailto:ccieid...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : BUG ? QoS with MLP LFI Hi there Yes they can reboot the router at anytime you have to explain the issue to proctor, however he is not going to help you. I had similar issues here and I found out that the Serial Interface was fake. I replaced the serial module with Cisco orginal and it worked. regards. On 22 February 2011 09:52, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.demailto:st...@pandacom.de wrote: Why should your proctor reboot the router? I woG5___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Slips on E1
Do show network on both and paste output. - Reply message - From: Vinay Kumar6 vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.com Date: Thu, Feb 24, 2011 11:34 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Slips on E1 To: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi, I have connected two routers Back-to-Back using the E1 Cross over cable, but I am unable to get the Multiple_Frame_Established. I see on one of the side as slips are increasing, I tried to change the Clock source to Internal. E1 0/1/0 is up. Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced No alarms detected. alarm-trigger is not set Version info Firmware: 20090113, FPGA: 20, spm_count = 0 Framing is NO-CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Internal. CRC Threshold is 320. Reported from firmware is 320. Data in current interval (287 seconds elapsed): 4 Line Code Violations, 1 Path Code Violations 1 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 2 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 3 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs E1 0/2/0 is up. Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced No alarms detected. alarm-trigger is not set Version info Firmware: 20090113, FPGA: 20, spm_count = 0 Framing is NO-CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Line Primary. CRC Threshold is 320. Reported from firmware is 320. Data in current interval (137 seconds elapsed): 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations 29 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 29 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs Warm Regards, Vinay Kumar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group
If you have a route pattern pointed directly to a trunk, you are not able to add it to an RG. Vice Versa is also true. Brian - Reply message - From: Jay Woods cisco...@live.com Date: Sun, Feb 20, 2011 5:54 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Does anyone know if I should be able to add an H.225 Gatekeeper controlled trunk to a Route Group? It's not showing up in my RG list in CUCM. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cross Connecting PRIs issue
Mark, check your cable. It looks like you are taking physical errors... t1s are slipping. - Reply message - From: Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Feb 19, 2011 8:56 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cross Connecting PRIs issue To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Yes network clock select is set. Show network clock at all the sites shows clocking coming from the PSTN. On Saturday, February 19, 2011, Nelu Cirstea nelu_cirs...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Mark, It looks like you have sleeps on your E1s. You have to do network-clock-select with priority on HQ router. Regards, Nelu -- Thanks, Mark L Reed Home: 260-637-1585 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cross Connecting PRIs issue
You have these connected with a t1 cross over cable, correct? I believe pinout should be 1to4, 2to5. Brian - Reply message - From: Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Feb 18, 2011 5:27 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cross Connecting PRIs issue To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Some additional information as I'm finding new things as I dig deeper. FYI, PSTN is a 3725 with two NM-HDVs running Cisco IOS Software, 3700 Software (C3725-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(15 )T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Debug isdn q921 on either side shows all TX's and no RX's. Sh serial on the PSTN side shows my Total Output Drops incrementing rapidly with 0 packets output. On the other side there are no drops and output packets is incrementing. On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not able to bring up any of my PRIs and I can't come up with a solution. I've gone though every guide Cisco has and brought up many PRIs in production but I'm thinking maybe there is something special for setting up the PSTN router I'm missing? No alarms, serial interface is up/up show isdn is Awaiting Establishment and TEI Assigned. It never goes to Multiple Frames. I tried multiple cables just in case. As soon as I get back I'm going to try connecting two branches together to eliminate the PSTN router but while I had a minute I wanted to go ahead and throw this out there for assistance. This is my relevant config. Show controller for my E1, my two T1s look exactly the same. network-clock-participate slot 1 network-clock-participate slot 2 controller E1 1/0 clock source internal pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 description ** E1 VOICE CONNECTION TO BR2-RTR ** ! controller T1 2/0 framing esf clock source internal linecode b8zs pri-group timeslots 1-3,23-24 description ** T1 VOICE CONNECTION TO HQ-RTR ** ! controller T1 2/1 framing esf clock source internal linecode b8zs pri-group timeslots 1-3,23-24 description ** T1 VOICE CONNECTION TO BR1-RTR ** interface Serial1/0:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice ! interface Serial2/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-ni isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice no cdp enable ! interface Serial2/1:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-ni isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice no cdp enable voice-port 1/0:15 translation-profile incoming block-call-into-BR2 translation-profile outgoing display-proper-ani-into-BR2 description ** PRI VOICE TRUNK TO BR2-RTR ** ! voice-port 2/0:23 translation-profile incoming block-call-into-HQ translation-profile outgoing display-proper-ani-into-HQ description ** PRI VOICE TRUNK TO HQ-RTR ** ! voice-port 2/1:23 translation-profile incoming block-call-into-BR1 translation-profile outgoing display-proper-ani-into-BR1 description ** PRI VOICE TRUNK TO BR1-RTR ** All three of my controllers are doing this: PSTN-WAN# sh controller e1 1/0 E1 1/0 is up. Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced Cablelength is Unknown Description: ** E1 VOICE CONNECTION TO BR2-RTR ** No alarms detected. alarm-trigger is not set Version info Firmware: 20100222, FPGA: 13, spm_count = 0 Framing is CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Internal. CRC Threshold is 320. Reported from firmware is 320. Data in current interval (661 seconds elapsed): 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations 661 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 661 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs Here is BR2, they all look pretty much the same network-clock-participate wic 2 network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0 controller E1 0/2/0 pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 interface Serial0/2/0:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bchan-number-order ascending no isdn outgoing display-ie voice-port 0/2/0:15 translation-profile incoming 4digitDNIS E1 0/2/0 is up. Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced No alarms detected. alarm-trigger is not set Version info Firmware: 20090408, FPGA: 13, spm_count = 0 Framing is CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Line. Data in current interval (59 seconds elapsed): 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations 59 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 59 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs -- Thanks, Mark L Reed -- Thanks, Mark L Reed Home: 260-637-1585 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] High Traffic Try Again Later
Search the Cisco support forms for code yellow. It usually means the calls are being throttled due to high cpu/memory utilization. Time for a reboot? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Tatiana Oliveira tati_olivei...@yahoo.com Date: Mon, Feb 14, 2011 11:08 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] High Traffic Try Again Later To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I´m receiving High Traffic Try Again Later on Cisco 7965 Phones and I´m using the 7.1.5.1-12. Do you have any idea about how to solve that? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper trunk registration (SUB)
Could be a replication problem. Make sue the ccm cluster is in sync. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Joli-coeur Wouter jwou...@gmail.com Date: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 5:52 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper trunk registration (SUB) To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Thanks for the info I have a sub configured for the correct CM group and the device pool has the correct CM group and the trunk is in the correct device pool. I think it might be a vmware problem or database problem? i just want to be sure that normally both trunks should show up if they are in the correct device group and the device group has the correct CM group. Regards, Joli-coeur Wouter On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, It seems you don't have Sub in CM Group configured for your trunk. Remember to restart it later. regards kobel On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 22:39, Joli-coeur Wouter jwou...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, I am running into some problems with cucm/gatekeeper configuration. For some reason only the PUB trunk is being registered. Is the SUB trunk to register automatically or do i need to configure something for that to happen ? interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.1 255.255.255.255 ip pim dense-mode h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.1 gatekeeper zone local GK cisco.com 177.1.254.1 zone prefix GK 2* zone prefix GK 4* no shutdown ! I created a gatekeeper in CUCM (pub) andi created a H.225 Trunk (Gatekeeper Controlled trunk) I added the trunk name GK-Trunk in the Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720 service Am i missing something ? PUB/SUB are vmware. Thanks for your help GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags --- - --- - - - *177.1.10.10 1720 177.1.10.10 32816 GKVOIP-GW *H323-ID: GK-Trunk_1 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.254.2 1720 177.1.254.2 61105 GKH323-GW Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 177.1.254.3 1720 177.1.254.3 61431 GKVOIP-GW H323-ID: CUCME E164-ID: 4001 E164-ID: 4002 E164-ID: 4003 E164-ID: 4300 E164-ID: 4301 E164-ID: 4302 Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 Total number of active registrations = 3 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Huntgroup (No Fwd)
You must also set a call forward no coverage (and the associated CSS) on the dn that forwarded the call to the hunt pilot. HTH Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Naoufal Kerboute naou...@mhdinfotech.com Date: Sun, Jan 2, 2011 4:06 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Huntgroup (No Fwd) To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi Gents, I'm working on Hunt group configuration on CUCM. I wanted the CallFwdNoAn and CallFwdBusy settings shoud be honored for the user who forwarded the call instead of the Hunt pilot/ Below My config: One Hunt Group One Hunt List One Hunt Pilot (5000) and I've checked Use Personal preferences for CallFwdNoAn and CallFwdBusy The problem is whenever I receive a call on the hunt Pilot the same ring in circular fashion but the CallFwdNoAn and CallFwdBusy doesn't happened even the forward settings has been set on the members of the hunt group. Simply I heard busy tone without forward. Any Ideas? Regards, Naoufal * * This Communication is Private Confidential. This message and any attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. * * It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or * * use this message any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachments from your system. * * ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] mobility connect - retrieve call at desk phone
I would believe at least software MTP would be required. The call has to land on the cucm somehow. - Reply message - From: vcciev vcc...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Dec 30, 2010 9:31 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] mobility connect - retrieve call at desk phone To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I know the Max Wait Time for Desk Pickup under End User parameter. It is not the cause. If PSTN is sending inband tone to indicate call release then there is nothing I can do, right? I think I am looking for the setting on the CUCM/VG (suppose the PSTN suits the requirement) Thanks. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, On the PSTN gw check if the disconnect msg received from PSTN is properly relayed to CUCM (e.g. BYE is sent in case of SIP). I've seen this happening, when the PSTN sent inband tones to indicate call release. regards kobel On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 05:11, vcciev vcc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When the mobile phone hangs up, one is supposed to be able to press resume softkey at the desk phone to retrieve the call. I couldn't get it work, instead the call disconnects immediately. Where I should check first? Is MOH required for this? Thanks. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC trouble
Sounds like it could be a replication issue. Try disabling the subscriber to see if it works. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Mritunjay Kumar mjs...@gmail.com Date: Sun, Dec 26, 2010 2:49 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC trouble To: bkvalent...@gmail.com bkvalent...@gmail.com, Shrini linuxbos...@gmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi All, thanks for responding. Did DNA , its hitting right CTI Route Point CCX is configured with g711. -Mritunjay On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:46 AM, bkvalent...@gmail.com bkvalent...@gmail.com wrote: Is uccx configured for g711? In the uccx config area. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Shrini linuxbos...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Dec 25, 2010 1:46 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC trouble To: 'Mritunjay Kumar' mjs...@gmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Kumar, Use DNA to see whets going on. Try calling directly the CTI port numbers. -S _ From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mritunjay Kumar Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2010 8:46 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC trouble hi All , Wish U ALL MARRY CHRISTMAS ! Getting issue in invoking IPCC's AA Created CTI group , application and JTAPI trigger. all phone , CTI PORT , Trigger DN are in null partition. when trigger number is called , BUSY message is seen on phone display and AA is not being invoked. All are in same Region ie g711. same server was workig earlier. i deleted respective config and tried to confg . i rebooted the cucm and IPCC server but no luck :( all service are up and running. CTI PORT and ROUTE point are registered. m missing something ? Regards, MJ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC trouble
Is uccx configured for g711? In the uccx config area. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Shrini linuxbos...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Dec 25, 2010 1:46 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC trouble To: 'Mritunjay Kumar' mjs...@gmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Kumar, Use DNA to see whets going on. Try calling directly the CTI port numbers. -S _ From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mritunjay Kumar Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2010 8:46 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC trouble hi All , Wish U ALL MARRY CHRISTMAS ! Getting issue in invoking IPCC's AA Created CTI group , application and JTAPI trigger. all phone , CTI PORT , Trigger DN are in null partition. when trigger number is called , BUSY message is seen on phone display and AA is not being invoked. All are in same Region ie g711. same server was workig earlier. i deleted respective config and tried to confg . i rebooted the cucm and IPCC server but no luck :( all service are up and running. CTI PORT and ROUTE point are registered. m missing something ? Regards, MJ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Introduction
I knew this guy was lying... John Smith from UK with broken English. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: John Smith john.smith.cc...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Dec 22, 2010 10:46 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Introduction To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com HI Team, I am john smith located in UK. I am new to this forum. SO hello to all you guys. I have started preparation for ccie voice since last sixth month. Guys i would need your help and as far as i know this group is very helpful. So many of my friends are member of this group. I hope my query will be answered and i look to learn from this forum as well. Thanks once again guys. Rgds, John Smith ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 LAB 1
B8ZS? ESF? All 24 channels? Top down vs. Bottom up? The PSTN gateway at PL is set to channels 1-3... how about sending config? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Dec 11, 2010 12:36 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook 2 LAB 1 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com hello All, I'm working on Lab 1 from Woorkbook 2 I've been having problems with the HQ PRI it doesn't seems to be working properly and i think the problem is on the PSTN router i don't receive incoming calls at all, i tested it with debug isdn q931, when i call from my pstn phone to a HQ phone i get a fast busy right away and the call never hits the pri on the HQ router i have the HQ PRI configured as MGCP. i have multiple frame established on the show isdn status however when i want to make a call from a HQ phone, i get a fast busy after 4 secs, if i debug the PRI i see that i'm sending the proper digits and it tries 3 times before it fails what should i do to fix this problem ? if i reload the HQ router the PRI starts flapping if i enable the debug isdn q921 i only send info and never receive anything from the pstn any help is greatly appreciated thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Deleting and Creating VM Box on Unity 5.0
COBRAS can help. www.ciscounitytools.com. - Reply message - From: Mark Padilla clane...@hotmail.com Date: Fri, Dec 10, 2010 1:20 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Deleting and Creating VM Box on Unity 5.0 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to delete and create and or move a users VM Box with saving the users VM and Greeting. Please let me know if anyone has a better way of moving this information other than deleting and having the user recreate evertyhing. From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 58, Issue 32 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:00:03 -0500 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. CFUR and SRST - is there a bug? (Tam Nhu) 2. Re: CFUR display For and By (Tam Nhu) 3. UCCX and CCM Integration Issue (shafqut hamid) 4. Re: UCCX and CCM Integration Issue (Prashant Patel) -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:11:47 -0600 From: Tam Nhu tamnhu...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR and SRST - is there a bug? Message-ID: aanlktikxyosqbxlbbg+s0s-tb=ftfecaqcjq8clyw...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Experts, Not sure if this subject has been posted before, but I could not find it in this forum. Here is the problem I just discovered a couple days back and can be duplicated in many labs. I have configured CFUR to display the correct full E164 digits in FOR and BY field; everything configured on CUCM, not the router. But when I finished my testing in SRST, and things are back to normal CUCM mode; I tested it again by shutdown the serial interface again to force it go back to SRST mode. Now, the FOR and BY field only display 4-digit, not full E164 as on the first test. I rebooted the router and went to SRST mode again, then everything is working with FOR and BY as expected. I then performed the same step above, no shut to back to CUCM mode, then shut to go in SRST mode, now I duplicated the same issue with FOR and BY display only 4-digit. I duplicated this many times on my own lab and IPX vRack lab as well. It does not matter the remote gateway is MGCP or H323 (I did test both with the same result). So looks like it is a bug to me and required to reboot the router every time after it went to SRST. I didn't know about this issue since we always have a fresh vRack session, and I only tested SRST once time, but not 2nd time on the same vrack session. Has anyone run into this before, and what is the bug ID if you have it? Is there another work-round to fix this? Thanks, Tam. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101210/d191a755/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:17:44 -0600 From: Tam Nhu tamnhu...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR display For and By Message-ID: aanlktinwzkx671mg8j+spd6j1rrjo-ezbxml+=ll6...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi study2b, You can look at this thread and make it works. http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg19418.html I've just posted a thread related to this issue, so if you make it works and run into the same problem, please let me know. Thanks, TN. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101210/b529c717/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 3 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:27:39 +0500 From: shafqut hamid shafqut.ha...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX and CCM Integration Issue Message-ID: aanlktik_c=nmwpmmdfd0moryvf9mva7p1vkajh6wm...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi, I have installed CCM 7.0 and UCCX 7.0 with all necessary configuration in VMWare but i am unable to test very first auto attendant script. Whenever i dial number for CTI route point i receive busy tone, although i can see both CTI Route Point and CTI ports registered on CCM. Also on UCCX Control Center operational state is in-service. I already checked the Partitions and Calling Search spa___ For more information regarding industry
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CIPC hangs at Registering when connecting to lab CUCM
Did you build the cipc as the cipc device type? You didn't build in cucm as a 7960/1 phone, as you did with ip blue, did you? Just a thought... Brian Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: ccieid1ot ccieid...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Nov 30, 2010 1:24 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CIPC hangs at Registering when connecting to lab CUCM To: Ginther, Scott [NTK] scott.gint...@sprint.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Go into your settings unlock, then Device and erased your CCM stuff. On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Ginther, Scott [NTK] scott.gint...@sprint.com wrote: Cristobal, That’s not a silly question at all. I have CIPC pointed at the CUCM Pub (10.10.210.10). The same TFTP server that I have my IP Blue client pointed at. The IP Blue client is registered and working. The CIPC client just says “registering”. Both the IP Blue and CIPC phones are configured in CUCM as SCCP with the correct MAC addresses. Nothing fancy. *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, November 30, 2010 8:54 AM *To:* Ginther, Scott [NTK] *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CIPC hangs at Registering when connecting to lab CUCM A silly question Dd you change the tftp settings of your Ipc to point to the proper server? Right click on the ipc, preferences, tftp Sent from my iPhone On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:45, Ginther, Scott [NTK] scott.gint...@sprint.com wrote: I’m having trouble connecting CIPC 7.0.5 to the virtual lab CUCM. CIPC hangs at “Registering”, and does not give an error. If I disconnect my virtual lab VPN connection and connect to my corporate network, CIPC will register to our corporate CUCM cluster. Am I missing something? I can't register my CIPC phone to the lab CUCM via SCCP or SIP. I could use a little help getting it configured correctly for the virtual lab. Thanks, -Scott- -- This e-mail may contain Sprint Nextel proprietary information intended for the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- This e-mail may contain Sprint Nextel proprietary information intended for the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP RSVP
Heres a hint. Read the qos srnd. Some WAN qos mechanisms are incompatible with ip rsvp. If I recall, the point of this lab is to teach you this lesson at the cost of your time and frustration. - Reply message - From: Stern, Larry larry.st...@nuvt.com Date: Sun, Nov 14, 2010 3:54 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP RSVP To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi all I going crazy trying to figure out this issue. I use a Hardware VPN to connect to PL with 7960 and 7961 phones. I am doing LAB 10A part 10.1 RSVP call agent. I have BR1 to HQ set to Manadtory under the Locations in CUCM and have all the DP settings and MRG and MRGL's as per the PG guide. My HQ and BR1 routers have ip rsvp bandwidth set to 80K on interface serial 0/0/1.0.1 on both Routers and my software MTP's are registered. But when I make one call between HQ and BR1 or vice versa, I get not enough bandwidth. My max sessions software is set for 4 on my router dspfarm MTP profile on both sides. If I remove the mandatory RSVP setting on the locations in CUCM, I can make the call no problem. Has anyone run into a similar issue? After getting frustrated I dumped the final config's into the routers and have the same issue. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended for the sole use of the individual(s) to whom they are properly addressed. Any use, dissemination or forwarding of this email and any files transmitted with it by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email. Black Box Corporation and its affiliates reserve the right to scan and monitor all e-mail traffic. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX get digit string
Exactly... use the music files built into uccx. - Reply message - From: Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de Date: Fri, Sep 24, 2010 6:39 am Subject: AW: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX get digit string To: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com, bkvalent...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi, This solution works as desired. Thanks :-) You don't need to waste your time to copy across the music-on-hold.au file and convert it to wav. You can use this wave file for example: ICM\ICMMusic_30.wav There is nothing mentioned to use the music on hold music ;-) Btw, converting a .au file to .wav is not so easy and it doesn't work with the windows audio recorder. Just renaming .au to .wav doesn't work either and callmanager can't convert the .au file to .wav like with mp3 files. You will need a converter and this will probably not be available for you at the lab. Cheers, Bernhard -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Im Auftrag von Stutz, Bernhard Gesendet: Freitag, 24. September 2010 10:27 An: Tanner Ezell; bkvalent...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX get digit string Hi, Thanks for your replies. This solution sounds reasonable. You probably need to copy across the music-on-hold.au file on the routers and convert it to wav with the windows audio recorder if this works. I will try this. Cheers, Bernhard -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Tanner Ezell [mailto:tanner.ez...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. September 2010 21:56 An: bkvalent...@gmail.com Cc: Stutz, Bernhard; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX get digit string They give you a prompt to play music with? Weird. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:44 PM, bkvalent...@gmail.com bkvalent...@gmail.com wrote: No. This is easier than you think. Use 2 menu steps. The first is your prompt with the 0 out to AA. Make the timeout 0 and the retries 0. The next step is a second menu. Make it the same, but for the audio prompt, use the music file. Still has 0 out to AA. Still has 0 timeout and 0 retries. HTH Brian - Reply message - From: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2010 3:24 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX get digit string To: Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Actually, I take that back. Putting the call on hold should prevent Get Digit String from working as desired. Ah well. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com wrote: Unless there is some context I am missing this is *not possible* with UCCX. I suspect they expect you to play a menu step that is interruptible. Having a user enter digits during MoH is not possible. But.. now that I think about it, you could do the following: Queue: Call Hold Get Digit String( P[], timeout=30, digits=1 ) - Success Call Unhold Redirect Call Unhold Prompt (Please continue to wait) Go to Queue Hmm. Hot damn, sometimes I amaze myself.. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote: Hi, I am stucked with a question on UCCX: snip ... At any time during the prompt or whilst music is being played the caller can press 0 to be routed to the UC AutoAttendant. /snip When i try to achieve this with GetDigitString the routine will wait for an input and not going further the script unless its timed out. when timed out i am not in that routine GetDigitString anymore to catch the caller input. How can this be solved? I see nothing what i can use at the select resource Routine. Anyone solved this? Any help on this is much appreciated. cheers, Bernhard ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection Greeting
Remove the display name. - Reply message - From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com Date: Fri, Sep 24, 2010 5:53 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection Greeting To: osl osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Is there an option so instead of the VM greeting being Sorry, Jon Doe is not available it says Sorry, extension 5001 is not available. Basically, I want it to say the extension instead of the name. Thanks, Mark ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One button login - Phone service
Wondering if replication is down between pub and sub. Ccx could be hitting sub, which maybe doesn't have the phone associated to the rmcm user... just an idea. - Reply message - From: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Sep 15, 2010 6:02 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One button login - Phone service To: KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Give that a shot and let us know. Beyond that you may have a broken system. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:47 PM, KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.com wrote: No i didn't. --- On *Thu, 9/16/10, Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com* wrote: From: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One button login - Phone service To: KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.com Date: Thursday, September 16, 2010, 5:39 AM Curious. Have you tried logging in via CAD to verify at least that works? On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:18 PM, KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=gkr2...@yahoo.com wrote: Please find the attached. I'm running out of ideas and no clue. Thanks. --- On *Thu, 9/16/10, Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.comhttp://mc/compose?to=tanner.ez...@gmail.com * wrote: From: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.comhttp://mc/compose?to=tanner.ez...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One button login - Phone service To: KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.com http://mc/compose?to=gkr2...@yahoo.com Cc: Amy Ryan ar...@ipexpert.comhttp://mc/compose?to=ar...@ipexpert.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comhttp://mc/compose?to=ccie_vo...@onlinestudylist.com Date: Thursday, September 16, 2010, 4:47 AM Just to verify, Have you set the Ext parameter to match the IPCC Extension field off the end user profile? On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM, KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=gkr2...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes I did. I reset the end user password few times. After that I reset phone, reset tftp but still the same. This is weird. --- On *Thu, 9/16/10, Amy Ryan ar...@ipexpert.comhttp://mc/compose?to=ar...@ipexpert.com * wrote: From: Amy Ryan ar...@ipexpert.comhttp://mc/compose?to=ar...@ipexpert.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One button login - Phone service To: KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.com http://mc/compose?to=gkr2...@yahoo.com, Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.comhttp://mc/compose?to=tanner.ez...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comhttp://mc/compose?to=ccie_vo...@onlinestudylist.com Date: Thursday, September 16, 2010, 4:25 AM When you assigned the service to the phone, did you populate the correct credentials to match what was set in the End User? --- Amy Ryan – CCIE #24677 (Voice) Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: *ar...@ipexpert.com *Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat * http://www.ipexpert.com/chat* eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Wireless, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities *http://www.ipexpert.com/communities* and our public website at www.ipexpert.com *http://www.ipexpert.com/* -- *From: *KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.com *Date: *Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:18:27 -0700 (PDT) *To: *Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com *Cc: *ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, Amy Ryan ar...@ipexpert.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One button login - Phone service No luck. I changed all the parameters with proper case. Actually i deleted the one i had and recreate the new one. But this time it didn't even gave me an option to input the agent credentials after pressing the service button -- One button login. It gives me the below response Either the agent ID or the password you entered is invalid. But i'm pretty sure the ID and password is correct. Do you guys think is it something to do with my IPC? I don't have the access to physical phone today otherwise i should have been tested. Thanks. --- On *Thu, 9/16/10, Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com* wrote: From: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One button login - Phone service To: KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, Amy Ryan ar...@ipexpert.com Date: Thursday, September 16, 2010, 3:39 AM Right off the bat I see you have you have the parameters as Extn, ID, pwd. Extn should be Ext, pwd should be Pwd (case matters). Change those and let me know. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM, KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.com /mc/compose?to=gkr2...@yahoo.com wrote: Please find the attached. Thanks. --- On *Thu, 9/16/10, Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com /mc/compose?to=tanner.ez...@gmail.com * wrote: From: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hide a particular user in theCorpora teDirectory
Disable the empty search. It's a call manager service parameter. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Tam Nhu tamnhu...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Sep 13, 2010 10:26 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hide a particular user in theCorporateDirectory To: bkvalent...@gmail.com bkvalent...@gmail.com Cc: cciefo...@hotmail.com, Hough, Earl earl.ho...@pcmall.com, ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I have tried all the workaround and suggestions, but none of them appear to be worked or fulfill the requirement of 'no display in the corporate directory'. Yes, you can put ~ or some special char in the front of First/Last (in both AD or DC directory) to hide them from the search by name, but it still appears in the search at the bottom as ~admin, ~crs. Again, the requirement is NO DISPLAY. Thanks for all the input and suggestion...I give up this one and except no credit from customer then:) TN. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice
There is no way anyone can answer this question without violating the Non Disclosure Agreement. - Reply message - From: Afzal Bhutta azhar.bhu...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Sep 2, 2010 9:17 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi all, Does any body know the voice lab also testing VPIM and extension mobility.I heard there is new scenario.Also there is some changes in the previous lab they are not testing C-barge in SRST any more.*Is that true? So if there is some changes in the lab what new features they are testing. Hopefully those who pass will shade something on the topic. Thanks, * ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctorlabs not resolving
Tyson, Sorry, bud. That doesn't cut it. It's completely absurd to think that people can work on labs that they can't load. Even if I wanted to work a lab completely from scratch without any base config, I can't configure the PSTN-wan router. So, its a complete waste of time. You need to address an ongoing availability problem with the PL website. Otherwise, you need to come up with a new way to allow us to load any given lab we wish to load (for instance via a menu once we telnet to the termserv). I know that I found this issue maddening when it impacted me. It's painful to set aside a day to study and then not have access for a few hours to even begin. As CCIE candidates and PL customers, we already sacrifice a lot of personal time to dedicate ourselves to this journey. Please don't waste our time. Telling me that you expect me to work on a lab that I cannot load is like slashing my tires and telling me to just drive anyway. Could I? I suppose I could, but not very far and it will likely be quicker to wait until the tires are fixed before I begin. Speaking from personal experience, I know that's how I felt. Brian - Reply message - From: Tyson Scott tsc...@ipexpert.com Date: Sun, Aug 29, 2010 6:03 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctorlabs not resolving To: 'marc abel' marca...@gmail.com, 'Jason Maynard' jason.mayn...@rogers.com Cc: ccie...@onlinestudylist.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, 'OSL CCIE Security Lab Exam' ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com Now you guys know there really there is no reason you have to login to the web interface except to load/revert/save configurations? For access to the routers/switches/servers simply connecting to them using the instructions Marko has given on our blog will work well enough and can be adapted for voice customers. In the future if PL is down there is no reason that it should stop you from beginning and working on your session. Just connect in and start your work on what you can and we will always eventually fix any problems on our end. Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 RS, Security, and SP Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: mailto:tsc...@ipexpert.com tsc...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: http://www.ipexpert.com/chat www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at http://www.ipexpert.com/communities www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at http://www.ipexpert.com/ www.ipexpert.com From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of marc abel Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 5:28 PM To: Jason Maynard Cc: ccie...@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctorlabs not resolving I was finally able to get in just now. On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Jason Maynard jason.mayn...@rogers.com wrote: That is correct --- I was also doing an nslookup but I had a typo protolabs.com --- here nor there it is down And I am missing my session again From: marc abel [mailto:marca...@gmail.com] Sent: August-29-10 4:38 PM To: Jason Maynard Cc: ccie...@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctorlabs not resolving Actually, I believe it is resolving, I can do an NSlookup and then ping the returned IP address. It is just the webserver throws an error after a long period of attempting to connect. The error is: Server Error The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request. JRun closed connection. On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:37 PM, marc abel marca...@gmail.com wrote: Same here. On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Jason Maynard jason.mayn...@rogers.com wrote: Having problems getting to protorlabs.com This happened yesterday during my lab and again today. Looks like protorlabs cannot be resolved. All other sites including ipexpert are working. Anyone else?? I cannot contact support because I cannot get to the site. This is frustrating as heck as I will be taking the lab in a few weeks and cannot afford missing prep time. Regards ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctorlabs not resolving
Maybe I am in the whiny minority... who feels that the thousands of dollars I've spent with IPExpert/PL gives me a sense of entitlement to a certain quality. It's a tough sell that your work around solution is to copy and paste when the voice labs mostly contain 5+ VMWare servers that can't be copied and pasted. There are more servers in the voice pods than all the other devices. Tyson, i completely understand that there will be snags in the technology occasionally. It happens. I was perfectly silent on this issue given that when I got bit on a weekend, I was issued a replacement voucher. It didn't replace my time, but it was the right thing to do. I just wanted to make sure this recurring issue is being properly addressed. I may have misunderstood your initial email. I thought you had resigned yourself to the fact that this is just the way it is going to be. Please say it isn't so. Brian - Reply message - From: Tyson Scott tsc...@ipexpert.com Date: Sun, Aug 29, 2010 8:23 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctorlabs not resolving To: 'marc abel' marca...@gmail.com, bkvalent...@gmail.com Cc: 'Jason Maynard' jason.mayn...@rogers.com, ccie...@onlinestudylist.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, 'OSL CCIE Security Lab Exam' ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com Marc, You guys do realize this is a lab environment right? I read this and feel that you want enterprise class service in an ever changing environment. This is somewhat disheartening to me as well. Do I want problems to occur, of course not. But I read these posts and feel a bunch of ingratitude to the way we have changed the training environment. I remember studying for my RS exam, paying 50+ dollars for a session with no remote power, no save load function, no scripts to wipe out previous students configuration. I would be lucky to get a rack that actually supported the topology of the workbook I was using without having to make changes to the startup configuration to account for differences in interfaces, routers, etc. And I would usually have to book a session three weeks in advance to even have a chance to get on a rack. It surprises me that I reach out to give you guys ideas to better utilize your time when a problem occurs; giving simple suggestions for things you can do to utilize your time in the event there is a problems. And get complaints back to my emails. Being a CCIE is having the ability to think outside the box. Getting responses back like this for providing constructive ideas simply reminds me again why I don't want to waste my time writing new grading scripts and other new advanced features. They simply become something else for a minority of our students to complain about. Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 RS, Security, and SP Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: mailto:tsc...@ipexpert.com tsc...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: http://www.ipexpert.com/chat www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at http://www.ipexpert.com/communities www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at http://www.ipexpert.com/ www.ipexpert.com From: marc abel [mailto:marca...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 7:56 PM To: bkvalent...@gmail.com Cc: Tyson Scott; Jason Maynard; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; OSL CCIE Security Lab Exam Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] Proctorlabs not resolving Brian, I would totally agree. I was trying to continue a lab from last night, so I didn't even have a copy that I could paste in. Then when I finally did get logged in an hour and a half after my session was to start I find that the script didn't save my configs from last night, despite starting the script 30 minutes before the session ended. This follows Friday night where The script processor wouldn't load other saved configs (my session was refunded). Tyson your comment makes it sound like you believe we should be ok with this kind of performance. This is disheartening because I know that you are managing a complex system and there are going to be glitches. I am willing to cut you some slack on that front if you acknowledge that this is not acceptable performance. I will say that the desire not to waste my study time troubleshooting things not on the blueprint is why I use proctor labs over dynamips. When this kind of stuff happens it can totally take the wind out of my study motivation. I would say that my desire not to battle technical issues outside of the study related ones is why I use Proctor labs
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PHONE REGISTplRATION
That's the dhcp pool for the remote phones. Are you doing a hardware vpn? If so, create a similar scope for your local phones. Otherwise, manually assign ips and tftp. Brian - Reply message - From: Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com Date: Sat, Aug 21, 2010 7:40 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PHONE REGISTplRATION To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I am new on proctor labs Please i need some one that has worked on this lab to help me out i have done all that is needed as per config to make my phones register but to no avail. please how do i get the phones local to me registered. HERE IS MY CONFIG ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.200.1 10.10.200.49 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.200.70 10.10.200.254 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.201.1 10.10.201.49 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.201.70 10.10.201.254 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254 ! ip dhcp pool HQPHONES network 10.10.200.0 255.255.255.0 option 150 ip 10.10.210.10 default-router 10.10.200.3 ! ip dhcp pool br1phones network 10.10.201.0 255.255.255.0 option 150 ip 10.10.210.10 default-router 10.10.201.1 ! ip dhcp pool br2phones network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0 option 150 ip 10.10.210.10 default-router 10.10.202.1 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper max calls per endpoint
Bingo. Endpoint resource-threshold was missing. Thanks. - Reply message - From: Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Aug 19, 2010 1:29 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper max calls per endpoint To: Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi, add endpoint resource-threshold under gatekeeper and maybe arq reject-resource-low regards kobel On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 19:26, Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.comwrote: endpoint max-calls h323id HQ-GW 1 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Phone Not Cancelling Session Upo n Request
Change the dtmf relay on the voice register pool to rtp-nte. Brian - Reply message - From: DeShon Crayton dcrayto...@comcast.net Date: Thu, Aug 19, 2010 8:33 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Phone Not Cancelling Session Upon Request To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I am running IOS 12.4.24. T3 on a 3845 I have a 7941 IP Phone with a SIP load of : SIP41.8-5-3SR1S My issue is a follows: 1. Place a call to the SIP phone 2. End call remotely prior to SIP phone answering 3. The SIP phone still shows the line button blinking with caller id showing I am not sure if I have a timer issue or a bug related problem on the 7941. I see 3003 send the CANCEL message: Aug 20 00:13:17.326: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: CANCEL sip:3...@172.16.32.51:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.3.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7207D From: SiteC Ph3 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;tag=52EFA4-114E To: sip:3...@172.16.32.51 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:13:09 GMT Call-ID: 8c3c31b1-ab2611df-8053e949-17e37...@10.10.3.1 CSeq: 101 CANCEL Max-Forwards: 70 Timestamp: 1282263197 Reason: Q.850;cause=16 Content-Length: 0 My config is as follows: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip fax protocol cisco sip bind control source-interface Loopback0 bind media source-interface Loopback0 registrar server expires max 600 min 60 voice register global mode cme source-address 10.10.3.1 port 5060 max-dn 5 max-pool 3 load 7941 SIP41.8-5-3SR1S timezone 23 time-format 24 date-format D/M/Y tftp-path flash: create profile sync 0022063813214158 ntp-server 172.16.30.250 mode unicast voice register dn 2 number 3002 name SiteC Ph2 no-reg label SiteC PH2 3002 ! voice register template 1 dialplan 1 softkeys connected Endcall Hold Park Trnsfer no conference enable ! voice register dialplan 1 type 7940-7960-others pattern 1 3... pattern 2 999 ! voice register pool 2 id mac 0022.9004.4147 type 7941 number 1 dn 2 template 1 dtmf-relay sip-notify username 3002 password cisco description 33132143002 codec g711ulaw Aug 20 00:13:09.430: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: INVITE sip:3...@172.16.32.51:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.3.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7207D Remote-Party-ID: SiteC Ph3 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;party=calling;screen=no;privacy=off From: SiteC Ph3 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;tag=52EFA4-114E To: sip:3...@172.16.32.51 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:13:09 GMT Call-ID: 8c3c31b1-ab2611df-8053e949-17e37...@10.10.3.1 Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat Min-SE: 1800 Cisco-Guid: 2345154899-2871398879-2152655177-400783259 User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER CSeq: 101 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 Timestamp: 1282263189 Contact: sip:3...@10.10.3.1:5060 Call-Info: sip:10.10.3.1:5060;method=NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000 Expires: 180 Allow-Events: telephone-event Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session;handling=required Content-Length: 206 v=0 o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 7078 7937 IN IP4 10.10.3.1 s=SIP Call c=IN IP4 10.10.3.1 t=0 0 m=audio 17734 RTP/AVP 0 19 c=IN IP4 10.10.3.1 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:19 CN/8000 a=ptime:20 Aug 20 00:13:09.446: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.3.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7207D From: SiteC Ph3 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;tag=52EFA4-114E To: sip:3...@172.16.32.51 Call-ID: 8c3c31b1-ab2611df-8053e949-17e37...@10.10.3.1 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:13:09 GMT CSeq: 101 INVITE Server: Cisco-CP7941G/8.5.3 Contact: sip:3...@172.16.32.51:5060;transport=udp Allow: ACK,BYE,CANCEL,INVITE,NOTIFY,OPTIONS,REFER,REGISTER,UPDATE,SUBSCRIBE Allow-Events: kpml,dialog Content-Length: 0 Aug 20 00:13:09.630: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.3.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7207D From: SiteC Ph3 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;tag=52EFA4-114E To: sip:3...@172.16.32.51;tag=00229004414700077048b4c3-81528c56 Call-ID: 8c3c31b1-ab2611df-8053e949-17e37...@10.10.3.1 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:13:09 GMT CSeq: 101 INVITE Server: Cisco-CP7941G/8.5.3 Contact: sip:3...@172.16.32.51:5060;transport=udp Allow: ACK,BYE,CANCEL,INVITE,NOTIFY,OPTIONS,REFER,REGISTER,UPDATE,SUBSCRIBE Remote-Party-ID: SiteC Ph2 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;party=called;id-type=subscriber;privacy=off;screen=yes Allow-Events: kpml,dialog Content-Length: 0 Aug 20 00:13:17.326: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: CANCEL sip:3...@172.16.32.51:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.3.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7207D From: SiteC Ph3 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;tag=52EFA4-114E To: sip:3...@172.16.32.51 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:13:09 GMT
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Phone Not Cancelling Session Upo n Request
Make sure you have a dial-peer. show voice register dial-peer. I suspect you may need to do authenticate register under voice register global as well. Is your SIP bind command a different interface than the source ip under voice reg global? Also did you do create profile and reset the pool? Brian - Reply message - From: DeShon Crayton dcrayto...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Aug 19, 2010 9:18 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Phone Not Cancelling Session Upon Request To: bkvalent...@gmail.com bkvalent...@gmail.com Cc: DeShon Crayton dcrayto...@comcast.net, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com hello Brian, the dtmf-relay change did not work Sent from my iPad On Aug 19, 2010, at 9:02 PM, bkvalent...@gmail.com bkvalent...@gmail.com wrote: Change the dtmf relay on the voice register pool to rtp-nte. Brian - Reply message - From: DeShon Crayton dcrayto...@comcast.net Date: Thu, Aug 19, 2010 8:33 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Phone Not Cancelling Session Upon Request To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I am running IOS 12.4.24. T3 on a 3845 I have a 7941 IP Phone with a SIP load of : SIP41.8-5-3SR1S My issue is a follows: 1. Place a call to the SIP phone 2. End call remotely prior to SIP phone answering 3. The SIP phone still shows the line button blinking with caller id showing I am not sure if I have a timer issue or a bug related problem on the 7941. I see 3003 send the CANCEL message: Aug 20 00:13:17.326: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: CANCEL sip:3...@172.16.32.51:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.3.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7207D From: SiteC Ph3 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;tag=52EFA4-114E To: sip:3...@172.16.32.51 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:13:09 GMT Call-ID: 8c3c31b1-ab2611df-8053e949-17e37...@10.10.3.1 CSeq: 101 CANCEL Max-Forwards: 70 Timestamp: 1282263197 Reason: Q.850;cause=16 Content-Length: 0 My config is as follows: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip fax protocol cisco sip bind control source-interface Loopback0 bind media source-interface Loopback0 registrar server expires max 600 min 60 voice register global mode cme source-address 10.10.3.1 port 5060 max-dn 5 max-pool 3 load 7941 SIP41.8-5-3SR1S timezone 23 time-format 24 date-format D/M/Y tftp-path flash: create profile sync 0022063813214158 ntp-server 172.16.30.250 mode unicast voice register dn 2 number 3002 name SiteC Ph2 no-reg label SiteC PH2 3002 ! voice register template 1 dialplan 1 softkeys connected Endcall Hold Park Trnsfer no conference enable ! voice register dialplan 1 type 7940-7960-others pattern 1 3... pattern 2 999 ! voice register pool 2 id mac 0022.9004.4147 type 7941 number 1 dn 2 template 1 dtmf-relay sip-notify username 3002 password cisco description 33132143002 codec g711ulaw Aug 20 00:13:09.430: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: INVITE sip:3...@172.16.32.51:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.3.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7207D Remote-Party-ID: SiteC Ph3 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;party=calling;screen=no;privacy=off From: SiteC Ph3 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;tag=52EFA4-114E To: sip:3...@172.16.32.51 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:13:09 GMT Call-ID: 8c3c31b1-ab2611df-8053e949-17e37...@10.10.3.1 Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat Min-SE: 1800 Cisco-Guid: 2345154899-2871398879-2152655177-400783259 User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER CSeq: 101 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 Timestamp: 1282263189 Contact: sip:3...@10.10.3.1:5060 Call-Info: sip:10.10.3.1:5060;method=NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000 Expires: 180 Allow-Events: telephone-event Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session;handling=required Content-Length: 206 v=0 o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 7078 7937 IN IP4 10.10.3.1 s=SIP Call c=IN IP4 10.10.3.1 t=0 0 m=audio 17734 RTP/AVP 0 19 c=IN IP4 10.10.3.1 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:19 CN/8000 a=ptime:20 Aug 20 00:13:09.446: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.3.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7207D From: SiteC Ph3 sip:3...@10.10.3.1;tag=52EFA4-114E To: sip:3...@172.16.32.51 Call-ID: 8c3c31b1-ab2611df-8053e949-17e37...@10.10.3.1 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:13:09 GM___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I have a Question?
CONGRATS! Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Beck, Ken kb...@vectorusa.com Date: Wed, Aug 18, 2010 8:45 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I have a Question? To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com What do I do with my time now that I PASSED!! ! Ken Beck CCIE Voice #26726 To Vik Amy, It was absolutely invaluable that first OWLE class I took and both of you were there. It truly changed my life. Amy, I have listened to the audio on demand like 10X. it's all I listened to in the car and taking walks. Vik, I can't express how much of an inspiration you are to us all. Coffee is on me GUYS! Information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the individual to whom it is addressed and is private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please kindly destroy it and notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE #26721 - I PASSED!
Congrats! Well done. It's an amazing accomplishment. - Reply message - From: Matthew Hall 1.matt.h...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Aug 17, 2010 6:19 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE #26721 - I PASSED! To: Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com Cc: CCIE Voice OSL ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Congrats I got my number on Monday, so the two Matts are in!! On Aug 17, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Matthew Berry wrote: I just got my score report. I passed guys. More follow-up to come later. Right now I'm now on cloud nine. :) CCIE #26271 Thanks, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com http://ciscovoiceguru.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Infrastructure Brainstorm request
I once forgot to put a default gateway in my dhcp scope. Makes it hard for the dhcp session to transition to unicast. Also, if the ip helper-address command is absent or misconfigured. The voice vlan on the branch router does not exist or has been disabled. Brian - Reply message - From: Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Aug 14, 2010 1:14 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Infrastructure Brainstorm request To: osl osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hello List I would like to initiate a thread which I invite all of you to collaborate sharing ideas on the following: What would you think could break DHCP relay traffiic to succeed with the scenario below: (CUCM DHCP) 3750WAN-RTR WAN WAN-RTR Etherswitch IP Phone So far I can think of the following: 1- CSA enabled in CUCMs 2- Vlan access-maps in Switch 3- DHCP snooping configured in switch 4- service dhcp disabled in the branch router 5- L2/L3 problem within the network 6- ACLs in L3 interfaces along the way 7-DHCP service disabled in CUCM 8-DHCP service server/subnet page misconfiguration I'm trying to go through all sections of the blueprint I believe I completed 100% at this stage and only practice troubleshooting scenarios. Would be thankful for any input Cheers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC won't TFTP
You built a cupc phone is cucm with device name UPCUSERNAME? You can collect detailed cupc logs from within the cupc client to see why it is failing. Brian - Reply message - From: Warren Heaviside (wheavisi) wheav...@cisco.com Date: Sun, Aug 8, 2010 7:56 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC won't TFTP To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com All, I'm working through Vol. 1 lab 13A (Presence). Integration is complete. In CUPS DiagnosticsSystem Dashboard shows all systems good. Trouble is the CUPC won't make it through the TFTP process. After launching CUPC I'm looking at HelpShow Server Health on the client itself. The connection/authentication to the CUPS itself is fine but it fails TFTP. I've disabled IPS on my laptop and verified TFTP Server (CUCM) settings in CUPS. I'm discounting my home based 871 due to the physical phones being able to TFTP. Thanks, Warren Warren Heavisidewheav...@cisco.com ENGINEER.CUSTOMER SUPPORT High Touch Technical Support Phone: +1 408 853 7995 Office Hour 9 am - 5 pm Pacific Monday - Friday For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Integration between CUCM and CUC
Yes. On the SIP trunk in cucm, make sure to enable outbound redirect. Enjoy. Brian - Reply message - From: Ryan Schwab schwab...@shaw.ca Date: Thu, Aug 5, 2010 7:48 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Integration between CUCM and CUC To: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I've configured a SIP trunk integration from CUCM to CUC, everything is working properly but with one major problem. When calling the phone configured to forward-no answer to voicemail (via the RP-SIP Trunk) the CALLING phone gets sent to CUC as a DIRECT call, not a forwarded call. Therefore, I cannot reach the called party's voicemail. Anyone have ideas? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping
I believe the qos srnd is provided on the computer's desktop in off format when you take the lab exam. No need to find it through the web interface. - Reply message - From: CCIE Voice GMAIL givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Aug 3, 2010 6:02 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Has anyone figured out how to access this through the documentation site? Ive been using the search function and looking through all of the menus without any luck. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Berlinski Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 2:33 PM To: Stutz, Bernhard Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping Hello there Check this path in the SRND WAN Aggregator QoS Design - WAN Edge Link-Specific QoS Design - Frame Relay - Slow-Speed (£ 768 kbps) Frame Relay Links, then turn the page and you will find it. HTH On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote: Hi all, In Proctorlabs there is always mentioned that the QOS SRND provides a adequate example for class-based shaping but i can't find them. Also i heard rumors that the QOS SRND document provided at the labs is not at Cisco Website available anymore. However i can find a version here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND/Qo S-SRND-Book.html but i can't find there an example for class-based shaping. Does anyone know where i can find such a adequate example? good luck and have fun in your studies, Bernhard ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt
Guys be careful. Score reports are subject to NDA. - Reply message - From: Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Jul 29, 2010 6:14 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt To: CCIE Voice GMAIL givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I've heard this from Cisco employees as well that when the proctors reach the conclusion that the candidate cannot make it up the 80% they just stop the correction. This is something I will definetely ask whenever there is another ask the expert forum. By the way has anyone ever looked for this info in the ask the expert archives? I know this forum is packed with Cisco staff. Can any of you clarify this for us? On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:29 AM, CCIE Voice GMAIL givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com wrote: I have heard this from a couple of people and even on this mailer. That is why I am bringing it up. I am not 100% sure if it is accurate or not. *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Graham Hopkins *Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2010 12:09 PM *To:* OSL Group *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt I don't see how this can be correct, if it is it makes the report meaningless. You could screw up a few early sections, fail on 79% and still have most of the report as 0. Of course as the score report is subject to NDA we'll never know. Still Ohamien keep working on it and you will get there. Graham On 29 Jul 2010, at 19:59, CCIE Voice GMAIL wrote: It’s also important to note, and correct me if I’m wrong, that the 0’s don’t necessarily mean you configured that section incorrectly. To my knowledge, once you lose more than 20 points, they simply stop grading your exam. So the later section may have 0’s but you configured them correctly. I feel like this is a big problem with the already vague score reports. I wish they would change this. If you are paying $1400, you deserve a full report in my opinion. *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Ashar Siddiqui *Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:25 AM *To:* Ohamien Uhakheme *Cc:* OSL Group *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First attempt I am sure you will figure out what mistakes you made which resulted in 0%. I know its very hard to find out when you are sure your solution is 100% but believe me I have been through this and you will come to know how a tiny mistake in that particular section or may be in some other section resulted in 0% for this section :) I hope you pass in 2nd attempt. Don't forget to break down your scores and analyze exactly which question you lost points. That will help you to work out on specific areas. Ash Ohamien Uhakheme wrote: Hey guys -- I've been lurking for a while, so I figured that I'd chime in. I sat for my first attempt yesterday with less than passing results. Like other people have mentioned, it is heart breaking to see 0% in areas that you are sure that you nailed completely. It's cool though, I needed to get the psychological first attempt out of the way, and I will probably schedule again for early September. IPExpert is spot on with their training material, and I definitely appreciate the effort that has gone into it. Thanks guys, Ohamien -- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Meetme: cannot use join select sof tkeys to join 3rd call to meetme conference
Just transfer the caller to the meet me extension. Select and join are for ad-hoc. - Reply message - From: Pavan pav.c...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Jul 22, 2010 7:16 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Meetme: cannot use join select softkeys to join 3rd call to meetme conference To: jeremy co jeremy.coo...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, cisco-v...@puck.nether.net cisco-v...@puck.nether.net Join is used to trigger ad hoc conference. It is not used for meetme conf. I am not sure if cme allows you to chain a add a ad hoc participant into meetme conf using join Sent from my phone On Jul 22, 2010, at 3:49 AM, jeremy co jeremy.coo...@gmail.com wrote: From admin guideL Soft Keys for Conference Functions In Cisco Unified CME 4.1 and later versions, the following soft keys provide conferencing functions for multi-party conferencing enhancements on your phone: • ConfList—Conference list. Lists all parties in a conference. For ad hoc conferences, this soft key is available for all parties in a conference. For meet-me conferences, this soft key is available for the creator only. Press Update to update the list of parties in the conference, for instance, to verify that a party has been removed from the conference. • Join—Joins an established call to a conference. You must first press Select to choose each connected call that you want to join in a conference, then press Join to join the selected calls to the conference. • RmLstC—Remove last caller. Removes the last party added to the conference. This soft key works for the creator only. • Select—Selects a call or conference to join to a conference and selects a call to remove from a conference. The creator can remove other parties by pressing the ConfList soft key, then use the Select and Remove soft keys to remove the appropriate parties. • MeetMe—Initiates a meet-me conference. The creator presses this soft key before dialing the conference number. Other meet-me conference parties only dial the conference number to join the conference. This soft key must be configured before you can initiate meet-me conferences. SCCP: Configuring Conferencing Options for a Phone cheers, Jeremy also look at section called: On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: From the admin guide: Meet-Me Conferencing in Cisco Unified CME 4.1 and Later versions In Cisco Unified CME 4.1 and later versions, meet-me conferences consist of at least three parties dialing a meet-me conference number predetermined by a system administrator. For example, the conference shown in Figure 24 is created when the conference creator at extension 1215 presses the MeetMe soft key and hears a confirmation tone, then dials the meet-me conference number 1500. Extension 1225 and extension 1235 join the meet-me conference by dialing 1500. Extensions 1215, 1225, and 1235 are now parties in a meet-me conference on extension 1500. MeetMe—Initiates a meet-me conference. The creator presses this soft key before dialing the conference number. Other meet-me conference parties only dial the conference number to join the conference. This soft key must be configured before you can initiate meet-me conferences. Join key can be used in normal conferencing. Ash From: jeremy co [mailto:jeremy.coo...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 July 2010 09:19 To: Ashar Siddiqui Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Meetme: cannot use join select softkeys to join 3rd call to meetme conference I'm not disagreeing with you. So what is the usage of select and join key that mentioned in CME admin guide , conference section ? Cheers, Jeremy On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: I don’t think it would work that way. All participants must come through by dialling meetme number to join a meetme conf (this is what I think) otherwise it won’t work. Ash From: jeremy co [mailto:jeremy.coo...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 July 2010 08:51 To: Ashar Siddiqui Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Meetme: cannot use join select softkeys to join 3rd call to meetme conference Ph1 go to seized state and then press meetme softkey then dial 4200 (meetme number) and ph2 and ph3 call to 4200 to join the conference. As I want to test join softkey feature , I made a call from PSTN to 4013. PH1 answer the call and then I try to join 4013 and 4200 togther using select and join key which is not working. Cheers, Jeremy On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry didn’t understand this bit “Ph1 create meetme conference and ph2 and ph3 joins to conference. PSTN
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE CLI UserPrompt
Bump - Reply message - From: Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Jul 17, 2010 9:04 pm Subject: CUE CLI UserPrompt To: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I'm experimenting with the CLI on CUE. I'm trying to figure out how much I can do from the Command Line. So, If I'm asked to create a custom promptand let's say there was a requirement not to record over any existing greetings... Is it possible to figure out the filename of the new custom prompt from the CUE CLI? Thanks folks for any help you can give. Brian Valentine ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctor rack 15, CUE issue
I had to bootload it during my session today. It was stuck in and endless reboot loop. Thought about reporting it. Figured it was worth the effort to learn the process. I thought I had fixed it. It worked after I reimaged it. Brian - Reply message - From: Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com Date: Thu, Jul 15, 2010 7:53 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] proctor rack 15, CUE issue To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com hi all, Is anybody experience CUE issue in rack 15 ? Has been 2 days stuck in 27% boot and no ipaddress in Service Engine 0/0 I tried to reboot many times, here is my config, pls help interface Service-Engine0/0 ip unnumbered Vlan400 service-module ip address 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.0 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1 BR2-RTR#sh run | s ip route ip route 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.255 Service-Engine0/0 Vlan400 is up, line protocol is up interface Vlan400 ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0 end tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SRST Mode
Is your ip source address on the phones config as the srst? Is that interface up/up? Ntp status? - Reply message - From: ccieid1ot ccieid...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Jul 14, 2010 6:20 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SRST Mode To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi gangs, I can not seem to get the ephones to register with their assigned DN's. Tried all types of srst mode auto-pro commands. Someone please give me a sanity check. ! telephony-service sdspfarm units 5 sdspfarm tag 1 SC-CFB no privacy conference hardware srst mode auto-provision none srst ephone template 1 srst dn template 1 srst dn line-mode octo max-ephones 10 max-dn 10 ip source-address 192.102.66.254 port 2000 system message Your phones are in fallback max-conferences 8 gain -6 call-forward pattern .T transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Apr 05 2009 12:47:04 ! ! ephone-dn-template 1 call-forward busy 91658200 call-forward noan 91658200 timeout 20 ! ! ephone-template 1 privacy off privacy-button softkeys remote-in-use Newcall CBarge softkeys idle Newcall Redial softkeys seized Redial Endcall Cfwdall Pickup Gpickup Meetme softkeys connected Hold Endcall Trnsfer Park Confrn ConfList ! ! ephone-dn 4 octo-line number B16A55 no-reg primary conference ad-hoc ! ! ephone-dn 10 octo-line number A100 conference ad-hoc ! ! ephone 1 privacy-button device-security-mode none max-calls-per-button 4 busy-trigger-per-button 1 ! ! ! ephone 2 privacy-button device-security-mode none max-calls-per-button 4 busy-trigger-per-button 1 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SRST Mode
Phones are sccp in cucm? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: ccieid1ot ccieid...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Jul 14, 2010 7:53 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SRST Mode To: CCIE Voice ccievoiced...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com, ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Tried again, removing telephony-s reloaded, phones registered to ccm after router boot up, failback to SRST, still just the system message and no extension. On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:32 PM, CCIE Voice ccievoiced...@gmail.com wrote: Jeff is correct...whenever I have to make a change to CME SRST config, especially the ephones, I copy all of my related config to notepad and issue the no telephony-service command. I then paste everything back in and it works fine. Don't know if this is a bug or what but it happens every single time. -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Price (jeffpric) Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 7:12 PM To: ccieid1ot Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SRST Mode I have definitely had this problem before, but never really figure out why it happens. Try this: Copy your telephony-service config to Notepad do a no telephony-service Register the phones with CUCM again Paste in your telephony-service config Bring down the WAN connection. Eventually the phones will register with the proper DNs. It's not ideal, but it works most of the time. Hope this helps, Jeff -Original Message- From: ccieid1ot [mailto:ccieid...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 4:10 PM To: Jeff Price (jeffpric) Cc: Edwin Dotson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SRST Mode Jeff, same thing. I had it registered back to CCM then failback to SRST. ccievoice-sitec#show telephony-service ephone-dn ephone-dn 4 octo-line number B16A55 no-reg primary preference 0 secondary 9 huntstop huntstop channel 8 call-waiting beep conference ad-hoc ephone-dn 10 octo-line number A100 preference 0 secondary 9 huntstop huntstop channel 8 call-waiting beep conference ad-hoc ccievoice-sitec#show run | s telephony telephony-service sdspfarm units 5 sdspfarm tag 1 SC-CFB no privacy conference hardware srst mode auto-provision all srst ephone template 1 srst dn template 1 srst dn line-mode octo max-ephones 10 max-dn 10 ip source-address 142.102.66.254 port 2000 system message Your phones are in fallback max-conferences 8 gain -6 call-forward pattern .T transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Apr 05 2009 12:47:04 ccievoice-sitec# On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Jeff Price (jeffpric) jeffp...@cisco.com wrote: You have the auto provision mode set to none. You should set to all so that CME will download the phone's config completely. This is most likely your problem. Try and change the command to srst mode auto all and let me know what happens. -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccieid1ot Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 3:54 PM To: Edwin Dotson Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SRST Mode Done that, and phones get nothing. On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Edwin Dotson edot...@ams.net wrote: Have you tried removing the static ephone configuration? They may be picking that profile which don't have buttons specified. Thanks Edwin Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: ccieid1ot ccieid...@gmail.com Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:20:27 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comCCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SRST Mode Hi gangs, I can not seem to get the ephones to register with their assigned DN's. Tried all types of srst mode auto-pro commands. Someone please give me a sanity check. ! telephony-service sdspfarm units 5 sdspfarm tag 1 SC-CFB no privacy conference hardware srst mode auto-provision none srst ephone template 1 srst dn template 1 srst dn line-mode octo max-ephones 10 max-dn 10 ip source-address 192.102.66.254 port 2000 system message Your phones are in fallback max-conferences 8 gain -6 call-forward pattern .T transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Apr 05 2009 12:47:04 ! ! ephone-dn-template 1 call-forward busy 91658200 call-forward noan 91658200 timeout 20 ! ! ephone-template 1 privacy off privacy___ For more information regarding
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] problems getting SIP phone registere d to BR2
Do not use SIP-notify. Use rtp-nte for sip endpoints on cucme. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Jul 10, 2010 3:50 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] problems getting SIP phone registered to BR2 To: CCIE Voice cc...@corb.net Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hello, Apart from everything else suggested, I don't thing router reset is necessary for this (you loose some time). I don't remember performing reload when I had this issue. Although for stubborn IP phones I usually perform factory reset and provide everything what the phone requests from TFTP. regards kobel On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:27 PM, CCIE Voice cc...@corb.net wrote: Thanks Adam. Your suggestion worked. I did add the phone type to the config as well as the steps below. I think it was the clearing/recreating the profiles and bouncing the router that did it. Thanks again...scd ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP
A router that has ntp server configured also acts as a server. You don't need ntp master to act as a server. Brian - Reply message - From: cisco voip voip.ccieci...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Jul 8, 2010 10:42 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP To: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com Cc: OSL osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com But ntp master command is necessary for the router to be able to be ntp server for anyone else. i agree about stratum chain, but without ntp master command publisher should not be able to get its clock. you can check show ntp associations on the router, after ntp master command only it will show you the local interface. now if you want to use the stratum to be 1 more from whatever the stratum is on actual source, you do not need stratum command, for anything else you need that commnd On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote: Cool, thanks Graham and Randall. On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Graham Hopkins wrote: Default stratum is 8 so a simple ntp master will work Graham On 8 Jul 2010, at 23:59, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote: Yikes, I meant ntp master stratum X not ntp server stratum X On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Holloway wrote: If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server x.x.x.x command to sync time from another source, but I want another device (such as PUB) to get its time from the HQ router, do I also need to configure the HQ router with ntp server stratum X or can UCM simply get the time sync from HQ without the stratum command? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VATS in the VOD
Thanks for clarifying! Brian - Reply message - From: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com Date: Wed, Jul 7, 2010 6:08 pm Subject: VATS in the VOD To: Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.com, OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Fragmentation values should be based on sending rate when there are active voice sessions- the target serialization delay of 10ms applies when there is voice traffic over the FR WAN. Therefore the fragmentation should be based on the adaptive rate. Sorry for any confusion. -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890 Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat http://www.ipexpert.com/chat IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities http://www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ From: Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:33:05 -0400 To: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com, OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: VATS in the VOD Anyone else care to shed some light? Thanks, Brian On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.com wrote: Vik, Well done on the VoD product. It's really very helpful. I was going through the WAN QoS video today. Question for you on VATS - should the fragment size be based on the adaptive rate or the cir? In the VoD you mention that the fragment size in the class should be 960, not 80. I understand that 80 was nonsense, but I was thinking it should be 480. I would appreciate it if you could clarify for me. See attached screenshot. Thanks in advance! Brian Valentine ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Offering to ProctorLabs Clients
I think its easy to test with a simple acl on hq-rtr. If br1phn2 is 192.168.5.13, my acl is ip access-list extended SRST deny ip 10.10.201.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.210.0 0.0.0.255 deny ip host 10.10.110.2 10.10.210.0 0.0.0.255 deny ip host 192.168.5.13 10.10.210.0 0.0.0.255 permit ip any any Applied outbound on fas0/0.30. Seems easy enough to me. Don't see much need to automate it. Plus in the real lab, how will people verify that their config is good? I wouldn't want to cripple people from learning how to verify. It's good practice for the big day. My .02. Brian - Reply message - From: Tyson Scott tsc...@ipexpert.com Date: Fri, Jul 2, 2010 5:21 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Offering to ProctorLabs Clients To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hey Voice Team, We recently made some design changes to our Voice bootcamp offerings to extend our PL infrastructure directly to the bootcamp phones. Meaning The Voice candidates in our bootcamps are able to test QoS, SRST, and other services offered at each branch site using the phones in the classes as if they were connected to the rack equipment. We can extend this same service to you as voice customers but I first wanted to check into the interest of you all to see if there is interest in the ability to do this. What it would provide is the phones that you have at your remote location, physical phones, would be able to appear as though they are directly connected to the PL devices. Now obviously this is going to add a lot of complexity that I will need to resolve so I want to first find if the interest is there. Please respond if interested. I will test this with a few students once we have the infrastructure in place to support this capability. It would be later next week. Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 RS, Security, and SP Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: VOIP issue between CUCM 7 to UC500
Open a TAC case with Cisco. - Reply message - From: Saeed IDris saee...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 1:10 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: VOIP issue between CUCM 7 to UC500 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi expert, I have strange issue with VOIP calls between two sites, the issue is when I dial from site B to site A the call is going fine, but when I call from site A to site B also is going fine except with Cisco IP Phone 7945 once they answer the call immediately goes down but If I try to reach another phone type all calls going fine ……any suggestion why 7945 drops calls, here is my setup details: Site A info: - Call Processing : CUCM 7.0 - Cisco IP Phones 7941 , 7911 7970 - Cisco IP Phones is registered as SIP with CUCM 7.0 - I add UC 500 “Site B” call processing as H.323 device - Configure route pattern , route list and route Group “UC 500” Site B info: - Call Processing : UC 500 - Cisco IP Phones 7945 , 7985 Soft phone - Cisco IP Phones is registered as SCCP with UC500 - Dial-peer already configured pointing to CUCM 7.0 “Site A” call processing Please note that I attached the debug on UC 500 while I make calls: Called Number: 406 (7945) Calling number : 106 (7941) Thanks in advance. SAEED ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 5C Q12 Mobile Voice Access
Yes. On your remote destination, don't put any leading digits. Don't put the 9 trunk access code. Leave it the same as your mobile ani. Use application dial rules to prefix the trunk access code. Mobile connect uses application dial rules to xform the redirecting number. MVA doesn't like it when the ANI of the caller is shorter than the configured remote destination. Brian - Reply message - From: Jones, Brett brett.jo...@redstone.co.uk Date: Thu, Jun 17, 2010 7:22 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 1 Lab 5C Q12 Mobile Voice Access To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hi, I have configure mobile voice access as describe in the video walk through, however when I dial in from my mobile or any other number the IVR asks for me to enter my remote destination number followed by the pound key and not my pin number. When I enter 12345# (which is the pin number) it tell me that it's not a recognised remote destination number. I have set the service parameter to partial match and even changed the matched digits to 7. Anyone see this before? Thanks DISCLAIMER: This correspondence may contain information which is confidential or proprietary or both. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of this communication without prior permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient you may not disclose, copy or use this information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender to discuss its return or destruction. The contents, comments and views contained or expressed within this correspondence do not necessarily reflect those of Redstone, its subsidiaries, affiliates, associates or sister companies and are not intended to create legal relations with the recipient. Redstone may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security and staff training. If you would like to know more about Redstone Converged Solutions, visit us on the web at www.redstoneconverged.co.uk or contact our Head Office on 0845 20 1. Redstone Converged Solutions Limited Registered in England Wales with Company Number: 02027207 Registered Office: Kirtlington Business Centre, Slade Farm, Kirtlington, Kidlington, Oxfordshire, OX5 3JA ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware Connectivity and VLAN Interfa ce Issues
Used pod 12 last night without incident. Brian - Reply message - From: Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com Date: Sun, Jun 13, 2010 5:09 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware Connectivity and VLAN Interface Issues To: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Has anyone else experienced issues with Pod 12 on PL? I am using that pod right now and have two issues that prevent me from moving forward. Issue 1: I can ping the virtual servers from my own hardware and from the remote routers. However, I cannot load the web page admin nor can I SSH into the CUCM/CUC devices. Issue 2: BR1 gateway has a line protocol down for VLAN interfaces 130 and 240. I mentioned this on the OSL a few weeks prior. The basic issue is that those interfaces will never show an UP/UP state. I have reloaded the router, removed configs, compared with previous working configs, etc. Still no dice. I made sure that the interfaces were configured properly. In fact, the same configuration works on BR2 (different VLAN ID and IPs, off course). Below are some outputs to defend issue two: BR1-RTR#show int vlan 130 Jun 14 00:44:05.575: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console BR1-RTR#show int vlan 130 Vlan130 is up, line protocol is down Hardware is EtherSVI, address is 0017.9460.8d40 (bia 0017.9460.8d40) Internet address is 10.10.101.1/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit/sec, DLY 100 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input never, output never, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters never Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored 0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 interface resets 0 unknown protocol drops 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out BR1-RTR#show ip int vlan 130 Vlan130 is up, line protocol is down Internet address is 10.10.101.1/24 Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255 Address determined by setup command MTU is 1500 bytes Helper address is not set Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled Multicast reserved groups joined: 224.0.0.5 Outgoing access list is not set Inbound access list is not set Proxy ARP is enabled Local Proxy ARP is disabled Security level is default Split horizon is enabled ICMP redirects are always sent ICMP unreachables are always sent ICMP mask replies are never sent IP fast switching is enabled IP fast switching on the same interface is disabled IP Flow switching is disabled IP CEF switching is enabled IP CEF switching turbo vector IP Null turbo vector IP multicast fast switching is enabled IP multicast distributed fast switching is disabled IP route-cache flags are Fast, CEF Router Discovery is disabled IP output packet accounting is disabled IP access violation accounting is disabled TCP/IP header compression is disabled RTP/IP header compression is disabled Policy routing is disabled Network address translation is disabled BGP Policy Mapping is disabled WCCP Redirect outbound is disabled WCCP Redirect inbound is disabled WCCP Redirect exclude is disabled BR1-RTR#show vlan-switch brief VLAN Name StatusPorts - --- 1default activeFa1/0, Fa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/3 Fa1/4, Fa1/5, Fa1/6, Fa1/7 Fa1/8, Fa1/9, Fa1/10, Fa1/11 Fa1/12, Fa1/13, Fa1/14, Fa1/15 130 DATA active 240 PHONES activeFa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/3, Fa1/4 Fa1/5, Fa1/6, Fa1/7, Fa1/8 Fa1/9, Fa1/10, Fa1/11, Fa1/12 Fa1/13, Fa1/14, Fa1/15 1002 fddi-default act/unsup 1003 token-ring-default act/unsup 1004 fddinet-default act/unsup 1005 trnet-defaultact/unsup interface FastEthernet1/1 switchport trunk native vlan 130 switchport mode trunk switchport voice vlan 240 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet1/2 switchport trunk native vlan 130 switchport mode trunk switchport voice vlan 240 spanning-tree portfast ! interface Vlan130 ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Vlan240
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC Voicmeail diversion
Just make 2999 an alternate ext of 2602. HTH, Brian - Reply message - From: Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Jun 9, 2010 8:37 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC Voicmeail diversion To: 'wolfsrudel' wolfsru...@gmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Thanks Wolf, If I disable VM on 2999, will an incoming call go to VM of2602? -Original Message- From: wolfsrudel [mailto:wolfsru...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 June 2010 13:33 To: Ashar Siddiqui; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC Voicmeail diversion resuming to the original called number is the expected behaviour. remove call-coverage settings from 2999 or disable it's diversion to vm. hth On 6/9/10, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have an issue with one of our customer where the call diversion is not working properly. The incoming number (352999) to extension 2602 after 1800hrs. Ext. 2602 has voicemail setup on it, which works internally and also when dialled as DDI - but this does not work when calls are diverted to it from 352999. I think it's a Unity issue that it gets back to the original called party for voicemail. Any workaround that it should go to voicemail of 2602? Thanks -- Sent from my mobile device ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE integration with CCM problems
Do your phones and gateways have the pt-vm partition in their css?
Brian
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
- Reply message -
From: Pavan K pav.c...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Jun 9, 2010 9:14 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE integration with CCM problems
To: osl osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
If i place all my CTI ports in the NULL partition everything works, If i put
them in PT-VM i get BUSY (CTI rejecting call).
Any additional CSS settings needed ?
=
Placed all my CTI Ports in PT-VM
Placed all my CTI Routepoints in Null partition.
CSS for Routepoints and Ports is CSS-VM { PT-VM + PT-Phones }
Doesn't work
==
--
- Pavan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE voice workbook 1
On the hwic ports on the router, you should use the trunk method. On the 3750, you should use the access port method. Brian Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Dew Swen dew.s...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Jun 8, 2010 9:19 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE voice workbook 1 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com I used the trunk method on the same lab a couple of days ago. It was just ok. -- Dew Swen CCVP, CCNP 08.06.2010 16:15, rsmail...@solcon.nl yazmış: Hello, i am preparing for the CCIE voice Lab. in the Lab1A solution the switchports are configured like: int fa0/3/0 switchport trunk native vlan 200 switchport mode trunk switchport voice vlan 400 should it be: switchport access vlan 200 switchport voice vlan 400 switchport mode access i know the trunk config is the old way. or are the 2 correct on the Lab exam. in the Lab3A the sip phone should use RFC2833 dtmf in the solution it is: dtmf-relay sip-notify should be: dtmf-relay rtp-nte or not ? regards Ron Schutte regards Ron ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )
Congrats! Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: wolfsrudel wolfsru...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Jun 5, 2010 11:32 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 ) To: Moataz Mamdouh moataz_m...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com congratulations moataz!!! time to relax now ;-) On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Moataz Mamdouh moataz_m...@yahoo.comwrote: ALL I passed the exam from the first attempt , thank you all for you help , really i learned a lot from you. Regards Moataz Mamdouh Tolba SEEGYPT Website:www.seegypt.com Technical Support Engineer CCIE # 26129 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VLAN interfaces down
Also if the vlans are disabled. Make sure the vlans are active.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
- Reply message -
From: Amy Ryan ar...@ipexpert.com
Date: Fri, Jun 4, 2010 7:33 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VLAN interfaces down
To: Angel Perez gorr...@hotmail.com, amccar...@cciequest.com,
ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
Cc: osl osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Matthew,
Did you do a ³sh cdp neighber² and verify what port the phone was plugged
into? I did notice below that you are showing the configuration for int
fa1/1 and the Proctor Lab Racks usually have the phone at BR1 plugged into
interface fa1/0 which is also not shown in your output as being set up. If
the phone was plugged into interface fa1/0 and was not configured properly
or shut, you would have this behavior.
If the vlan.dat file was not present in flash and the VLAN¹s were configured
as you have shown below, then they would not show up when you do a ³sh
vlan-s bri², but they would show up in a ³sh ip int bri². See ScreenShots:
BR1-RTR#sh vlan-s bri (with vlan.dat deleted from flash)
VLAN Name StatusPorts
-
---
1default activeFa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/3, Fa1/4,
Fa1/5
Fa1/6, Fa1/7, Fa1/8, Fa1/9,
Fa1/10
Fa1/11, Fa1/12, Fa1/13,
Fa1/14, Fa1/15
1002 fddi-default act/unsup
1003 token-ring-default act/unsup
1004 fddinet-default act/unsup
1005 trnet-defaultact/unsup
!
!
BR1-RTR#sh ip int bri
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
Protocol
...
Vlan13010.10.101.1 YES NVRAM up
down
Vlan24010.10.201.1 YES NVRAM up
down
I will be around on Sunday. If you are able to recreate this then, contact
me and I can hop into your session and look around.
Thank you,
Amy
---
Amy Ryan CCIE #24677 (Voice)
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
http://www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130
IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities http://www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/
From: Angel Perez gorr...@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:03:41 +
To: amccar...@cciequest.com, ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
Cc: osl osl ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VLAN interfaces down
Hi:
If the vlan.dat file is deleted you will get this result
Make sure that the vlan exists and also that it is active:
vlan 130
create
name data
status active
vlan 240
create
name voice
status active
hth
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:08:22 -0400
From: amccar...@cciequest.com
To: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VLAN interfaces down
Hey Bro,
I ran into an issue similar to that before but mine was because there
was no phone connected to the port.
Antonio
Quoting Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com:
I see this issue from time to time. The VLAN interfaces on my BR1-RTR
show a state of up, but line protocol is down.
I made sure that there are ports with the vlans configured. I reload
the router. I also made sure the vlans were in existence.
At this point, my BR1-RTR is useless until I get this working. Any ideas?
interface Vlan130
ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan240
ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0
...
interface FastEthernet1/1
switchport trunk native vlan 130
switchport mode trunk
switchport voice vlan 240
BR1-RTR#show vlan-switch br
VLAN Name Status Ports
-
---
...
130 DATA active Fa1/1, Fa1/15
240 PHONES active Fa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/3, Fa1/4
Fa1/5, Fa1/6, Fa1/7, Fa1/8
Fa1/9, Fa1/10, Fa1/11, Fa1/12
Fa1/13, Fa1/14, Fa1/15
BR1-RTR#show ip int bri
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
Protocol
...
Vlan130 10.10.101.1 YES manual up
down
Vlan240 10.10.201.1 YES NVRAM up
down
--
*Matthew Berry*
/A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/
*_Vitals:_*
*GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044
*Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
*Skype*: ciscovoiceguru
*Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru
*_Cert Stats:_*
Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Direct transfer to Original called p arty Voicemail
Just give the phones the trnsfvm softkey. Brian - Reply message - From: Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com Date: Wed, May 26, 2010 7:03 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Direct transfer to Original called party Voicemail To: r.ochi...@mfient.com Cc: 'osl osl' ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com So you mean in CUE, I just have to assign alternate extension for every user starting with 6 like 62904, 62905, 62906 ... If x2905 transfer the call to 62904, would it go straight to VM for 2904 or will it first ring for 10s and then go to voicemail? Do I have to create ephone-dn for all of these? (remember customer has 100+ users and dn) Thanks for your help Ash From: Rogers Ochieng [mailto:r.ochi...@mfient.com] Sent: 26 May 2010 10:57 To: 'Ashar Siddiqui' Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Direct transfer to Original called party Voicemail I'm thinking secondary number in CUE for the user say 62904 and you route that to CUE so 6 can be your assumed prefix for diverting calls to CUE for other subscriber From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ashar Siddiqui Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 12:20 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Direct transfer to Original called party Voicemail Hello all, One of my customer is interested in direct transfer of an incoming call to voicemail after it has been picked up by someone else in the pickup group. For e.g. If a call comes in and ring x2904 but he is not available, person at x2905 picks up the call but the calling party wants to leave a VM for x2904. How the person at x2905 can direct transfer the call to x2904 voicemail. One way is to transfer the call back to x2904 which will ring and ring for 10s and then go to voicemail. This is not what they want. They want the ability to transfer the call directly to voicemail of Original called party. ephone-dn 1 octo-line number 2904 pickup-group 1 label Tim Flynn (2904) name Tim Flynn call-forward busy 8005 call-forward noan 8005 timeout 10 corlist incoming User-international ! ! ephone-dn 2 octo-line number 2905 pickup-group 1 label Steve Zander (2905) name Steve Zander call-forward busy 8005 call-forward noan 8005 timeout 10 corlist incoming User-international ! ! Ash ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unable to Bind L3 to CCM
You forgot service mgcp at the end of your pri-group command in controller config. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: Jeff Price (jeffpric) jeffp...@cisco.com Date: Fri, May 21, 2010 6:55 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unable to Bind L3 to CCM To: CCIE Voice Maillist ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hey everyone, Have you ever seen a situation where you can register a MGCP GW to CUCM but you are unable to bind L3 to CCM in IOS? Here's what I see: R1(config-if)#isdn bind-l3 ? q931 Select IOS Q.931 R1(config-if)# Here is my config: R1#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 3127 bytes ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec service password-encryption ! hostname R1 ! boot-start-marker boot system flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9_ivs_li-mz.124-24.T.bin boot-end-marker ! logging message-counter syslog enable password 7 110A1A0C12 ! no aaa new-model network-clock-participate wic 0 ! dot11 syslog ip source-route ! ! ip cef ip dhcp excluded-address 10.5.200.1 ! ip dhcp pool HQ_PHONES network 10.5.200.0 255.255.255.0 option 150 ip 172.21.51.204 default-router 10.5.200.1 ! ! no ipv6 cef ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! ! ! isdn switch-type primary-ni ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! voice-card 0 ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! ! controller T1 0/0/0 pri-group timeslots 1-3,24 ! controller T1 0/0/1 ! ! ! ! ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 description $ETH-LAN$$ETH-SW-LAUNCH$$INTF-INFO-GE 0/0$ no ip address duplex auto speed auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.102 encapsulation dot1Q 102 native ip address 172.21.51.196 255.255.255.224 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.150 encapsulation dot1Q 150 ip address 10.5.100.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.250 encapsulation dot1Q 250 ip address 10.5.200.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-ni isdn incoming-voice voice isdn outgoing display-ie no cdp enable ! interface Serial0/1/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF tx-ring-limit 128 tx-queue-limit 128 serial restart-delay 0 frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/1/0.1 point-to-point ip address 162.5.101.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ! interface Serial0/1/0.2 point-to-point ip address 162.5.102.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore frame-relay interface-dlci 202 ! router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 10.5.100.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 10.5.200.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 162.5.101.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 162.5.102.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 172.5.100.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 172.21.51.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 ! ip forward-protocol nd ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.21.51.193 ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! nls resp-timeout 1 cpd cr-id 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! voice-port 0/0/0:23 ! ccm-manager redundant-host 172.21.51.204 ccm-manager mgcp ! mgcp mgcp call-agent 172.21.51.205 service-type mgcp version 0.1 mgcp fax t38 ecm mgcp bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.250 mgcp bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.250 ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous terminal-type mon line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 password 7 110A1A0C12 logging synchronous login terminal-type mon ! scheduler allocate 2 1000 end Here is the status of CCM registration: R1(config)#do show ccm MGCP Domain Name: R1 PriorityStatus Host Primary Registered 172.21.51.205 First BackupBackup Ready 172.21.51.204 Second Backup None Current active Call Manager:172.21.51.205 Backhaul/Redundant link port: 2428 Failover Interval: 30 seconds Keepalive Interval: 15 seconds Last keepalive sent:00:03:46 UTC May 22 2010 (elapsed time: 00:00:06) Last MGCP traffic time: 00:03:46 UTC May 22 2010 (elapsed time: 00:00:06) Last failover time: 23:59:51 UTC May 21 2010 from (172.21.51.205) Last switchback time: 00:00:21 UTC May 22 2010 from (172.21.51.204) Switchback mode:Graceful MGCP Fallback mode: Not Selected Last MGCP Fallback start time: None Last___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
