Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card....
Thank you Roger. i am using same device-line CSS approach with RP. The only difference is Route pattern. Instead of 91900XXX, i am using 91900? RP. Now ? at the end of pattern is my concern. it should match any digit string with range 91 through 919.(as per admin guide) Its not the case here in my lab. only 91900.0( or any number of zeros after dot) work. if i put any non zero digit after dot(.), it doesn't match. Thanks, Mudassar Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:03:24 -0600 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card From: roger.car...@gmail.com To: mudas...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Mudassar, Which wildcard did you use? 91X will block any number from 91[0 thru 9]. Actually this wouldn't let you type any 4th digit since it is the closest match when dialing a 900 numbers. To block 900 numbers; I would use the device-line CSS approach with RP 91900XXX in partition blocked assigned to the IP phones line CSS. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/dialplan.html#wp1150997 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Experts, while practicing volume 1 lab 5.9: block 91900? pattern for all phones. ? wild card has no effect if the number is not consecutive zeros after 91900 digit string. CUCM help says: The route pattern 91X? routes or blocks all numbers in the range 91 through 919. But I am not able to hit this pattern unless I dial consecutive zeros. Would anybody highlight its usage? Thanks, Mudassar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card....
Try the ! wildcard instead. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of mudassar Khalid Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 2:51 AM To: roger.car...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card Thank you Roger. i am using same device-line CSS approach with RP. The only difference is Route pattern. Instead of 91900XXX, i am using 91900? RP. Now ? at the end of pattern is my concern. it should match any digit string with range 91 through 919.(as per admin guide) Its not the case here in my lab. only 91900.0( or any number of zeros after dot) work. if i put any non zero digit after dot(.), it doesn't match. Thanks, Mudassar _ Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:03:24 -0600 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card From: roger.car...@gmail.com To: mudas...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Mudassar, Which wildcard did you use? 91X will block any number from 91[0 thru 9]. Actually this wouldn't let you type any 4th digit since it is the closest match when dialing a 900 numbers. To block 900 numbers; I would use the device-line CSS approach with RP 91900XXX in partition blocked assigned to the IP phones line CSS. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/dialplan.html#wp1 150997 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Experts, while practicing volume 1 lab 5.9: block 91900? pattern for all phones. ? wild card has no effect if the number is not consecutive zeros after 91900 digit string. CUCM help says: The route pattern 91X? routes or blocks all numbers in the range 91 through 919. But I am not able to hit this pattern unless I dial consecutive zeros. Would anybody highlight its usage? Thanks, Mudassar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card....
I had hard time understanding ? wild card in CUCM. I believe it depends on inter digit timeout to match the pattern ( 0 or more digits) On 11/15/2010 2:51 AM, mudassar Khalid wrote: Thank you Roger. i am using same device-line CSS approach with RP. The only difference is Route pattern. Instead of 91900XXX, i am using 91900? RP. Now ? at the end of pattern is my concern. it should match any digit string with range 91 through 919.(as per admin guide) Its not the case here in my lab. only 91900.0( or any number of zeros after dot) work. if i put any non zero digit after dot(.), it doesn't match. Thanks, Mudassar Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:03:24 -0600 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card From: roger.car...@gmail.com To: mudas...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Mudassar, Which wildcard did you use? 91X will block any number from 91[0 thru 9]. Actually this wouldn't let you type any 4th digit since it is the closest match when dialing a 900 numbers. To block 900 numbers; I would use the device-line CSS approach with RP 91900XXX in partition blocked assigned to the IP phones line CSS. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/dialplan.html#wp1150997 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.com mailto:mudas...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Experts, while practicing volume 1 lab 5.9: block 91900? pattern for all phones. ? wild card has no effect if the number is not consecutive zeros after 91900 digit string. CUCM help says: The route pattern 91X? routes or blocks all numbers in the range 91 through 919. But I am not able to hit this pattern unless I dial consecutive zeros. Would anybody highlight its usage? Thanks, Mudassar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card....
Hi Experts, while practicing volume 1 lab 5.9: block 91900? pattern for all phones. ? wild card has no effect if the number is not consecutive zeros after 91900 digit string. CUCM help says: The route pattern 91X? routes or blocks all numbers in the range 91 through 919. But I am not able to hit this pattern unless I dial consecutive zeros. Would anybody highlight its usage? Thanks, Mudassar___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card....
Mudassar, Which wildcard did you use? 91X will block any number from 91[0 thru 9]. Actually this wouldn't let you type any 4th digit since it is the closest match when dialing a 900 numbers. To block 900 numbers; I would use the device-line CSS approach with RP 91900XXX in partition blocked assigned to the IP phones line CSS. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/dialplan.html#wp1150997 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.comwrote: Hi Experts, while practicing volume 1 lab 5.9: block 91900? pattern for all phones. ? wild card has no effect if the number is not consecutive zeros after 91900 digit string. CUCM help says: The route pattern 91X? routes or blocks all numbers in the range 91 through 919. But I am not able to hit this pattern unless I dial consecutive zeros. Would anybody highlight its usage? Thanks, Mudassar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
