Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 5-Lab-Handbook Lab 2 Wan QoS Solution
I woiuild most likely just do the 95% even if you don't have to, either way you have to fix the 56K issue, so why not do it at 95% which is best practice? That said, I would imagine that they are just looking for specific numbers on the site A to site B link and as long as the site A to site C link is not 56K (which would break CAC/RSVP too) you would be OK but again, there is not really any extra time to do 95% verse 100%. Heck if you do it enough, you would have it burned in your memory and not even have to use the calculator for this. On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Gang Du seek...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi all, ** ** In the 5-Lab-Handbook Lab 2 Wan QoS Solution, the link between SA and SB is shaped to 95% of the PVC speed, but the link between SA and SC is shaped to 100% of the PVC speed. If best practice is followed, shouldn’t the link between SA and SC be shaped to 95% of the PVC speed as well? ** ** Can someone please elaborate why the inconsistency? Thanks a lot. ** ** ** ** Kind Regards, ** ** Gang Du ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 5-Lab-Handbook Lab 2 Wan QoS Solution
Hi all, In the 5-Lab-Handbook Lab 2 Wan QoS Solution, the link between SA and SB is shaped to 95% of the PVC speed, but the link between SA and SC is shaped to 100% of the PVC speed. If best practice is followed, shouldn't the link between SA and SC be shaped to 95% of the PVC speed as well? Can someone please elaborate why the inconsistency? Thanks a lot. Kind Regards, Gang Du ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 5-Lab-Handbook Lab 2 Wan QoS Solution
That is an excellent question. It has been asked on this forum a few times. I haven't seen a consensus though. I have seen Vik go with 100% on the 1536k link in the solution guides. I have seen him apply the 95% rule in a video I watched recently. At this point, my opinion is to follow the SRND and in the SRND I see all FRTS map-policies use the 95% rule for 1536k links. That is just my opinion at this stage of the game. I would be curious what others have concluded. -Bill On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:07 PM, Gang Du wrote: Hi all, In the 5-Lab-Handbook Lab 2 Wan QoS Solution, the link between SA and SB is shaped to 95% of the PVC speed, but the link between SA and SC is shaped to 100% of the PVC speed. If best practice is followed, shouldn’t the link between SA and SC be shaped to 95% of the PVC speed as well? Can someone please elaborate why the inconsistency? Thanks a lot. Kind Regards, Gang Du ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com Follow me on twitter @ucguerrilla ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
