Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call-Forward to VM

2011-10-06 Thread Ken Wyan
Under call forward ; check CSS.

First remove  partition assigned to hunt-pilot  check again

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Jason Lee jas7...@gmail.com wrote:

 All,

 Having a weird problem.  I have CUC integrated with CUCM via SCCP.  I'm
 able to access the CUC server by dialing the VM pilot or pressing the
 messages button on the phone.

 When I forward calls to VM under line configuration using the VM checkbox I
 get a fast-busy. If I uncheck the box and manually enter the VM pilot number
 it works fine.

 Has anyone ever run into this problem?


 thanks,

 Jason

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call-Forward to VM

2011-10-05 Thread Jason Lee
All,

Having a weird problem.  I have CUC integrated with CUCM via SCCP.  I'm able
to access the CUC server by dialing the VM pilot or pressing the messages
button on the phone.

When I forward calls to VM under line configuration using the VM checkbox I
get a fast-busy. If I uncheck the box and manually enter the VM pilot number
it works fine.

Has anyone ever run into this problem?


thanks,

Jason
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call-Forward to VM

2011-10-05 Thread Ashraf Ayyash
check what vm profile is assigned to this number , if its the default
go ahead and specify the vm profile manually


ash

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jason Lee jas7...@gmail.com wrote:
 All,

 Having a weird problem.  I have CUC integrated with CUCM via SCCP.  I'm able
 to access the CUC server by dialing the VM pilot or pressing the messages
 button on the phone.

 When I forward calls to VM under line configuration using the VM checkbox I
 get a fast-busy. If I uncheck the box and manually enter the VM pilot number
 it works fine.

 Has anyone ever run into this problem?


 thanks,

 Jason

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call-Forward to VM

2011-10-05 Thread Kshitij Singhi
 thing matching is my ip any
 any line.? I do not see any matches to the 2427 or 2428 line.

 Per Matthew's e-mail and link the show policy-map interface is not
 supported on 3750 switch:
 https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3434098#3434098

 So is there no way to verify if my configuration is correct?

 HQ-SW1#sh run int gi 0/6
 Building configuration...

 Current configuration : 243 bytes
 !
 interface GigabitEthernet0/6?description Trunk to HQ
 ?switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
 ?switchport trunk allowed vlan 100,200,300
 ?switchport mode trunk
 ?ip access-group mgcp in
 ?mls qos trust dscp
 ?service-policy input limit-mgcp

 end

 HQ-SW1#sh access-list
 Extended IP access list mgcp
 ??? 10 permit tcp any any eq 2000
 ??? 20 permit udp any eq 2427 any
 ??? 30 permit tcp any eq 2428 any
 ??? 40 permit icmp any any
 ??? 50 permit ip any any (89 matches)

 HQ-SW1#sh run | begin policy-map
 policy-map limit-mgcp
 ?class mgcp
 ? set ip dscp cs3
 ? police 8000 8000 exceed-action drop
 ?class class-default
 ? set ip dscp default
 !
 ip access-list extended mgcp
 ?permit tcp any any eq 2000
 ?permit udp any eq 2427 any
 ?permit tcp any eq 2428 any
 ?permit icmp any any
 ?permit ip any any

 HQ-SW1#sh mls qos interface gi 0/6
 GigabitEthernet0/6
 Attached policy-map for Ingress: limit-mgcp
 trust state: trust dscp
 trust mode: trust dscp
 trust enabled flag: ena
 COS override: dis
 default COS: 0
 DSCP Mutation Map: Default DSCP Mutation Map
 Trust device: none
 qos mode: port-based

 HQ-SW1#sh policy-map interface gi 0/6
 ?GigabitEthernet0/6

 ? Service-policy input: limit-mgcp

 ??? Class-map: mgcp (match-all)
 ? 0 packets, 0 bytes
 ? 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
 ? Match: access-group name mgcp

 ??? Class-map: class-default (match-any)
 ? 0 packets, 0 bytes
 ? 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
 ? Match: any
 ??? 0 packets, 0 bytes
 ??? 5 minute rate 0 bps

 Thanks!



 
 From: Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com
 To: Kat gkr2...@yahoo.com
 Cc: Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice cciestudyvo...@yahoo.com; 
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 4:42 PM
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from
 HQ-SW?


 In fact both ports are correct (default ports).

 - Udp 2427 is used for mgcp messages.
 - Tcp 2428 is used for mgcp backhaul traffic.

 This mistake is ACL since those ports will be as source ports from R1 to
 CUCM and not destenation ports (destenation ports in the other direction
 from CUCM to R1). Correct ACLs should be as below.

 ip access-list extended mgcp
 ?? permit udp any eq 2427 any
 ?? permit tcp any eq 2428 any

 Try this and lets know the status. In between mls qos should be enabled
 since switches do qos in hardware.


 Regards,
 Mohammed Al Baqari
 Sent from my iPhone

 On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Kat gkr2...@yahoo.com wrote:


 permit tcp any any eq 2427? is incorrect, suppose to be 2428. Not sure if
 that was a typo.
 
 Thanks.
 
 ?
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Cciestudyvoice Cciestudyvoice cciestudyvo...@yahoo.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:42 AM
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to limit MGCP Bandwidth from HQ from
 HQ-SW?
 
 
 Hi all,
 I am trying to figure out how I can limit MGCP traffic coming from R1 on
 the switch.
 
 
 I have attempted the following configuration:
 
 
 class-map match all mgcp
 ?? match access-group name mgcp
 
 
 policy-map limit-mgcp
 ?? class mgcp
  set ip dscp cs3
  police 8000 8000 exceed action drop
 
 
 interface GigabitEthernet 0/6
 ?? switchport mode trunk
 ?? service-policy input limit-mgcp
 
 
 
 ip access-list extended mgcp
 ?? permit udp any any eq 2427
 ?? permit tcp any any eq 2427
 
 
 This looks right to me but when I do sh policy-map interface gi 0/6 I
 never see the packets incrementing.? I can confirm that this is the only
 port to which R1 is connected via sh cdp nei.
 
 
 Any help appreciated.
 
 
 Thanks!
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111005/c66be5bf/attachment-0001.html

 --

 Message: 3
 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:24:00 -0400
 From: Jason Lee jas7...@gmail.com
 To: ccie_voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call-Forward to VM
 Message-ID