subject:"\[OSL \| CCIE_Voice\] Interface for binding\?"

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?

2012-12-01 Thread virajith

hi Steffen,

Thanks for your reply


If we can bind to any interface ( gig , loopback ) then is it necessary for us 
to setup the thenbsp; routing as well asnbsp; traffic from loopback ornbsp; 
virtual interfaces needs to reach the callmanger and other devices also if the 
routing needs to setup then this is going to eat into the allocated exam time?


-Vir




From: Steffen Bruening lt;stbruen...@gmail.comgt;
Sent: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:24:35 
To: virajith lt;vir...@rediffmail.comgt;
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com lt;ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comgt;
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?
Generally it doesn't matter to which you bind your media resources. But maybe 
the question ask you for a specific binding.
The only thing you never should do is to bind Cubenbsp;and Gatekeeper to the 
same Interface.

Regardsnbsp;
Steffen

Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2012 schrieb virajith :

Hi All,

I am wondering which would be the best interface to bind for transcoders , 
gateways , cfbs and for sccp configurations I know loopback is the best for 
binding but with like to clarify with the example below...


For example...

R3#sh ip int brief
Interfacenbsp;nbsp; IP-Addressnbsp;nbsp; OK? Method Status Protocol
Serial0/0/1:0 nbsp; unassignednbsp;nbsp; YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/0/1:0.101nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 142.1.67.2 YES NVRAM up up
Vlan1nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; unassignednbsp;nbsp; YES NVRAM up up

Vlan502nbsp;nbsp; 142.102.66.254 nbsp; YES NVRAM up up
Vlan602nbsp;nbsp; 142.202.66.254nbsp;nbsp; YES NVRAM up up
SSLVPN-VIF0nbsp;nbsp; unassignednbsp;nbsp; NO unset up up
Loopback0nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 142.1.66.254nbsp;nbsp; YES NVRAM up up


In the above scenarionbsp; interface vlan502 is the is in thenbsp; voice 
vlannbsp; interface with the ip addressnbsp; ofnbsp; 142.102.66.254nbsp; . 
However I have the loopback ip addressnbsp; is 142.1.66.254.nbsp;nbsp; 


My Servers ( CUCM , CUC, CUPS, CCX) are innbsp; 142.100.64.x

In this situation which is the best interface to bin with and whynbsp; ?


-Vir



Catch India as it happens with the Rediff News App. To download it for FREE, 
click here

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?

2012-12-01 Thread Steffen Bruening

You don't have to change the routing, routing is done for you. You can the
reach the CUCM from any interface.

Am Sonntag, 2. Dezember 2012 schrieb virajith :

hi Steffen,

Thanks for your reply

If we can bind to any interface ( gig , loopback ) then is it necessary
for us to setup the the routing as well as traffic from loopback or
virtual interfaces needs to reach the callmanger and other devices also if
the routing needs to setup then this is going to eat into the allocated
exam time?

-Vir

From: Steffen Bruening stbruen...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'stbruen...@gmail.com');
Sent: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:24:35
To: virajith vir...@rediffmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'vir...@rediffmail.com');
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com');
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com');

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?
Generally it doesn't matter to which you bind your media resources. But
maybe the question ask you for a specific binding.

The only thing you never should do is to bind Cube and Gatekeeper to the
same Interface.

Regards

Steffen

Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2012 schrieb virajith :

Hi All,

I am wondering which would be the best interface to bind for transcoders ,
gateways , cfbs and for sccp configurations I know loopback is the best for
binding but with like to clarify with the example below...

For example...

R3#sh ip int brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Serial0/0/1:0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/0/1:0.101 142.1.67.2 YES NVRAM up up
Vlan1unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Vlan502 142.102.66.254 YES NVRAM up up
Vlan602 142.202.66.254 YES NVRAM up up
SSLVPN-VIF0 unassigned NO unset up up
Loopback0 142.1.66.254 YES NVRAM up up

In the above scenario interface vlan502 is the is in the voice vlan
interface with the ip address of 142.102.66.254 . However I have the
loopback ip address is 142.1.66.254.

My Servers ( CUCM , CUC, CUPS, CCX) are in 142.100.64.x

In this situation which is the best interface to bin with and why ?

-Vir

http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?
Catch India as it happens with the *Rediff News App*. To download it for
FREE, click
herehttp://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://www.rediff.com/newsapp___lnk=signaturenewservice=newsapp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?

2012-11-30 Thread virajith

Hi All,

I am wondering which would be the best interface to bind for transcoders , 
gateways , cfbs and for sccp configurations I know loopback is the best for 
binding but with like to clarify with the example below...

For example...

R3#sh ip int brief
Interfacenbsp;nbsp; IP-Addressnbsp;nbsp; OK? Method Status Protocol
Serial0/0/1:0 nbsp; unassignednbsp;nbsp; YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/0/1:0.101nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 142.1.67.2 YES NVRAM up up
Vlan1nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; unassignednbsp;nbsp; YES NVRAM up up
Vlan502nbsp;nbsp; 142.102.66.254 nbsp; YES NVRAM up up
Vlan602nbsp;nbsp; 142.202.66.254nbsp;nbsp; YES NVRAM up up
SSLVPN-VIF0nbsp;nbsp; unassignednbsp;nbsp; NO unset up up
Loopback0nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 142.1.66.254nbsp;nbsp; YES NVRAM up up


In the above scenarionbsp; interface vlan502 is the is in thenbsp; voice 
vlannbsp; interface with the ip addressnbsp; ofnbsp; 142.102.66.254nbsp; . 
However I have the loopback ip addressnbsp; is 142.1.66.254.nbsp;nbsp; 

My Servers ( CUCM , CUC, CUPS, CCX) are innbsp; 142.100.64.x

In this situation which is the best interface to bin with and whynbsp; ?


-Vir
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?

2012-11-30 Thread Steffen Bruening

Generally it doesn't matter to which you bind your media resources. But
maybe the question ask you for a specific binding.

The only thing you never should do is to bind Cube and Gatekeeper to the
same Interface.

Regards

Steffen

Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2012 schrieb virajith :

Hi All,

For example...

In the above scenario interface vlan502 is the is in the voice vlan
interface with the ip address of 142.102.66.254 . However I have the
loopback ip address is 142.1.66.254.

My Servers ( CUCM , CUC, CUPS, CCX) are in 142.100.64.x

In this situation which is the best interface to bin with and why ?

-Vir

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interface for binding?

4 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information