Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Network side vs User side clocking !

2013-03-25 Thread Tony Zunt
Since no one responded, I guess I'll be the geek for now.



The difference between using network-side clocking and user-side clocking
is similar to the DCE / DTE difference.  PRI and E1 are implementations of
the ISDN protocol over T1 à a point-to-point, synchronous circuit.  Synchronous
circuits require timing, so one end should operate as the master of the
clock and the other end should recover the clock/timing/synchronization
from the master.  One of the amazing things about T1 design is that one
doesn’t necessarily have to setup clocking correctly to get the circuit to
work.  However, you must configure it correctly to get the circuit to work
well.



When I started out, clocking was rudely referred to as master/slave, but
fortunately many vendors like Cisco adopted more politically-correct
terminology.  Network = Master (usually telco side).  User side is the
other end.



In Cisco's case the clock master is defined under the controller T1 x/x/x
as 'clock source internal.'  Usually a PRI handoff from the PSTN in the
real world would be set as so for you on whatever equipment they use to
provide you your T1 span.  I'd expect your controllers on the PSTN router
in the lab to be set ‘clock source internal.’  Don't know for sure if Cisco
does it that way in the lab; I assume they would if they wanted it to bear
any resemblance to the real world.



Therefore, the site A,B  C controllers would normally be set opposite to
network side, which would be to say, ‘clock source line.’  Since this is
the default, the command becomes invisible in the config.  A good way
someone told me to remember this is, You set the controller to ‘clock
source line’ if you want it to look up the line for the clock.



The part in your question about layer 1 and layer 2 doesn't exactly pertain
to clocking.  The 4-wire T1 is layer 1, pins 1-2/4-5.  Q.921 is layer 2.  Q.931
is layer 3.



Without going into much detail, what you can do with the
network-clock-participate and network-clock-select command is to inform the
router about your preferences as to what to do with the clock timing(s) it
recovers on its various T1 controllers.



For example in the real world, it is possible to have a PRI from carrier X
and another span from carrier Y.  In this case you might want to use
network-clock-select to control the relative priority of the two clock
sources.  It is a best practice to set network-clock-select explicitly even
if you have only one PRI/E1, as doing so avoids slips.



Network-clock-participate informs the router that it may be possible to
gather a clock source on a particular wic, and the network-clock-select
informs the router as to which one of those to use to sync the backplane of
the router.  Your PVDM2s that provide the DSPs for the PRIs are probably
installed on the backplane, so it would probably be nice if they had
benefit to the same clock synchronication.



This has nothing to do with NTP.  Different kind of clock.  Use the
following command to check your T1 clocking.



2951R2#show network-clocks

  Network Clock Configuration

  ---

  Priority  Clock SourceClock State Clock Type



 1  T1 0/0/0GOODT1

 2  T1 0/1/0GOODT1

10  Backplane   GOODPLL



  Current Primary Clock Source

  ---

  Priority  Clock SourceClock State Clock Type



 1  T1 0/0/0GOODT1



https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/189145



Thanks




On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi geeks :)

 What is the difference between using Network side clocking and User Side
 clocking.

 Regarding the exam, do they ask us to use any one of the both
 in particular ?

 I saw practice question informing that the PRI circuit layer 2 should be
 user side

 where as it will be a network side clocking for layer 1

 as for the last sentence (network site), I would assume that we will use 
 *network-clock- participate  wic
 X*
 *
 *
 *Waiting your valuable input *

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Network side vs User side clocking !

2013-03-25 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Really good explanation from Tony.

As an addendum to him, you can use show controllers command to verify
that the controller is set to clock source line, which, as Tony already
mentioned, is hidden being default.


On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Tony Zunt tony.z...@gmail.com wrote:

 Since no one responded, I guess I'll be the geek for now.



 The difference between using network-side clocking and user-side clocking
 is similar to the DCE / DTE difference.  PRI and E1 are implementations
 of the ISDN protocol over T1 à a point-to-point, synchronous circuit.  
 Synchronous
 circuits require timing, so one end should operate as the master of the
 clock and the other end should recover the clock/timing/synchronization
 from the master.  One of the amazing things about T1 design is that one
 doesn’t necessarily have to setup clocking correctly to get the circuit to
 work.  However, you must configure it correctly to get the circuit to
 work well.



 When I started out, clocking was rudely referred to as master/slave, but
 fortunately many vendors like Cisco adopted more politically-correct
 terminology.  Network = Master (usually telco side).  User side is the
 other end.



 In Cisco's case the clock master is defined under the controller T1 x/x/x
 as 'clock source internal.'  Usually a PRI handoff from the PSTN in the
 real world would be set as so for you on whatever equipment they use to
 provide you your T1 span.  I'd expect your controllers on the PSTN router
 in the lab to be set ‘clock source internal.’  Don't know for sure if
 Cisco does it that way in the lab; I assume they would if they wanted it to
 bear any resemblance to the real world.



 Therefore, the site A,B  C controllers would normally be set opposite to
 network side, which would be to say, ‘clock source line.’  Since this is
 the default, the command becomes invisible in the config.  A good way
 someone told me to remember this is, You set the controller to ‘clock
 source line’ if you want it to look up the line for the clock.



 The part in your question about layer 1 and layer 2 doesn't exactly
 pertain to clocking.  The 4-wire T1 is layer 1, pins 1-2/4-5.  Q.921 is
 layer 2.  Q.931 is layer 3.



 Without going into much detail, what you can do with the
 network-clock-participate and network-clock-select command is to inform the
 router about your preferences as to what to do with the clock timing(s) it
 recovers on its various T1 controllers.



 For example in the real world, it is possible to have a PRI from carrier X
 and another span from carrier Y.  In this case you might want to use
 network-clock-select to control the relative priority of the two clock
 sources.  It is a best practice to set network-clock-select explicitly
 even if you have only one PRI/E1, as doing so avoids slips.



 Network-clock-participate informs the router that it may be possible to
 gather a clock source on a particular wic, and the network-clock-select
 informs the router as to which one of those to use to sync the backplane of
 the router.  Your PVDM2s that provide the DSPs for the PRIs are probably
 installed on the backplane, so it would probably be nice if they had
 benefit to the same clock synchronication.



 This has nothing to do with NTP.  Different kind of clock.  Use the
 following command to check your T1 clocking.



 2951R2#show network-clocks

   Network Clock Configuration

   ---

   Priority  Clock SourceClock State Clock Type



  1  T1 0/0/0GOODT1

  2  T1 0/1/0GOODT1

 10  Backplane   GOODPLL



   Current Primary Clock Source

   ---

   Priority  Clock SourceClock State Clock Type



  1  T1 0/0/0GOODT1



 https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/189145



 Thanks




 On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi geeks :)

 What is the difference between using Network side clocking and User Side
 clocking.

 Regarding the exam, do they ask us to use any one of the both
 in particular ?

 I saw practice question informing that the PRI circuit layer 2 should be
 user side

 where as it will be a network side clocking for layer 1

 as for the last sentence (network site), I would assume that we will use
 *network-clock- participate  wic X*
 *
 *
 *Waiting your valuable input *

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




-- 
Suresh Bhandari

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Network side vs User side clocking !

2013-03-23 Thread CCIEing
Hi geeks :)

What is the difference between using Network side clocking and User Side
clocking.

Regarding the exam, do they ask us to use any one of the both
in particular ?

I saw practice question informing that the PRI circuit layer 2 should be
user side

where as it will be a network side clocking for layer 1

as for the last sentence (network site), I would assume that we will
use *network-clock- participate  wic
X*
*
*
*Waiting your valuable input *
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com