Re: [ccp4bb] Phasing with Many Monomers/AU

2014-01-20 Thread Carlos Frazao

Hi,
In the past I had two cases where seemingly unsuccessful MR became 
successful simply by collecting the missing cusp, which is due to exist 
in your P1 case if you collected your data by rotation of the crystal 
around a single orientation.
However, I don't know if modern MR programs use techniques that overcome 
that problem.

Carlos

G. Sridhar Prasad wrote:

It will be useful if you share the unit cell dimensions, may be it 
belongs to a higher symmetry, given the low resolution, you may have 
missed it out.


 


Sridhar

 

From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of 
Eugene Valkov

Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 6:37 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Phasing with Many Monomers/AU

 

What is the sequence identity of your best search model? Finding that 
many copies in P1 with 3A data is a challenge but certainly not 
impossible if there is a reasonably close (20-25% identity) search 
model available. I would suggest spending some time on preparing a 
very good search model with tools like Sculptor as well as manually 
trimming loops and using ensembles of conserved folds from several 
homologous structures.


 

It is also worth remembering that there are a number of different 
programs available for molecular replacement and it is worth investing 
some time in learning how to use Molrep and Amore as well as Phaser as 
they all have different strengths and weaknesses.


 

Is your data otherwise devoid of any other problems like 
pseudo-translational symmetry? These can be readily identified with 
tools like phenix.xtriage. PST can complicate matters quite 
considerably in molecular replacement.


 

SAD phases, even if obtained at low-resolution, can still be very 
useful if combined with molecular replacement, so it is well worth 
pursuing all lines of attack simultaneously.


 


Hope this helps.

 


Eugene

 

On 19 January 2014 19:30, Chris Fage cdf...@gmail.com 
mailto:cdf...@gmail.com wrote:


Thank you all for your responses. I already have a few ideas about
how to approach the problem.

One of my concerns with so monomers per asymmetric unit at lower
resolution was the failure of MR software. Neither PHENIX nor
Phaser MR have made progress. I am fairly new to anomalous
methods, having solved only two structures by SeMet-based SAD.
I've certainly picked up on a number of tricks from the recent
messages on heavy atoms, but I thought my case might be a little
unusual. I am confident the space group is P1, as it was the only
viable option when I indexed four clean albeit low-res datasets.

The monomers are ~38 kDa, and the crystals diffracted to 3.4-3.0
at a synchrotron.


The conditions for both native and SeMet crystals are:
8-12% PEG 2000 MME, 0.2 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M sodium acetate
pH 5.5.

 


Macromolecular seeding of native crystals into SeMet drops yields
the needle-like crystals.

Any further input is greatly appreciated!

Regards,
Chris

 


On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Chris Fage cdf...@gmail.com
mailto:cdf...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello Everyone,

I am currently trying to phase a structure with an asymmetric
unit predicted to contain 20-24 monomers (space group P1). The
native crystals, while beautiful in appearance (see attached),
only diffract to ~3.4-3.0 angstroms at best, and SeMet-derived
crystals grow with poor morphology (small needles). Also,
based a fluorescence scan, I know that mercury does not bind
appreciably. Other than screening for a new space group, what
options might I have for phasing this many monomers at lower
resolution? Is there any real chance of solving the structure
in this space group?


Thank you in advance for any suggestions!

Regards,
Chris

 




 


--

Dr Eugene Valkov

 


Room 3N049

Division of Structural Studies

 


MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology

Francis Crick Avenue

Cambridge Biomedical Campus

Cambridge CB2 0QH, U.K.

 


Email: eval...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk mailto:eval...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk

Tel: +44 (0) 1223 267358



--
**
Dr. Carlos Frazao
Structural Biology Laboratory - 
Macromolecular Crystallography Unit

ITQB-UNL, Av Republica, Apartado 127
2781-901 Oeiras, Portugal

Phone:  (351)-214469666
FAX:(351)-214433644

e-mail: fra...@itqb.unl.pt
   www.itqb.unl.pt



[ccp4bb] chi1 definition in proteins

2010-04-12 Thread Carlos Frazao

Dear ccp4 users,

I have found contadictory classifications in side-chain dihedral chi1, 
namely for gauche(+) and gauche(-), and I would like to know the actual 
convention.


It seems that in general for polymers G- (gauche(-) ?) and G+ (gauche(+) 
?) correspond to dihedral angles -60 and +60 degrees, according to 
http://goldbook.iupac.org/C01088.html, but I also find exanples where 
chi1 is defined by dihedral N-CA-CB-CG with gauche(-) and gauche(+) 
corresponding to dihedral angles +60 and -60 degrees (reversing the 
IUPAC naming above).


Does anyone knows what is the accepted convention ? A reference?

Thanks.

Carlos

--
**
Dr. Carlos Frazao
Structural Biology Laboratory - 
Macromolecular Crystallography Unit

ITQB-UNL, Av Republica, Apartado 127
2781-901 Oeiras, Portugal

Phone:  (351)-214469666
FAX:(351)-214433644

e-mail: fra...@itqb.unl.pt
   www.itqb.unl.pt