Re: [ccp4bb] relationship between resolution and B values

2013-01-19 Thread Huanwang Yang
Dear Qixu

The RCSB has a webpage to show the statistics (the data populations and
the correlation with the resolution) for all the annotated pdb data items.
The current page is
http://rcsb-auto-check.rutgers.edu/dev/pdbitem/index.html

The graph that you need may be the one 
http://rcsb-auto-check.rutgers.edu/dev/pdbitem/DAT_STORE//refine_B_iso_mean_res.data.png

Best, 
Huanwang


On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:14:47 +0800, Qixu Cai caiq...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear all,
 
 Could you please teach me any method to present the relationship between
 resolution and B values of all the x-ray structures in Protein Data
Bank.
 Can the PDB statistics in RCSB do it?
 
 Thank you very much!
 
 Q. Cai


Re: [ccp4bb] relationship between resolution and B values

2013-01-19 Thread Huanwang Yang
Dear Qixu

I am so sorry that I made a mistake. The webpage
http://rcsb-auto-check.rutgers.edu/dev/pdbitem/index.html is under
development and not available yet. 

The graph for B factor vs resolution is available
http://rcsb-auto-check.rutgers.edu/dev/pdbitem/DAT_STORE//refine_B_iso_mean_res.data.png
 

Regard,
Huanwang

On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:18:19 -0500, Huanwang Yang hy...@rcsb.rutgers.edu
wrote:
 Dear Qixu
 
 The RCSB has a webpage to show the statistics (the data populations and
 the correlation with the resolution) for all the annotated pdb data
items.
 The current page is
 http://rcsb-auto-check.rutgers.edu/dev/pdbitem/index.html
 
 The graph that you need may be the one 

http://rcsb-auto-check.rutgers.edu/dev/pdbitem/DAT_STORE//refine_B_iso_mean_res.data.png
 
 Best, 
 Huanwang
 
 
 On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:14:47 +0800, Qixu Cai caiq...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear all,
 
 Could you please teach me any method to present the relationship
between
 resolution and B values of all the x-ray structures in Protein Data
 Bank.
 Can the PDB statistics in RCSB do it?
 
 Thank you very much!
 
 Q. Cai


Re: [ccp4bb] a question related to SF-tool

2012-01-03 Thread Huanwang Yang

Dear Dialing

It looks like that the conversion using the 'auto mode'  is successful. 
The error message might come from the multiple 'Associated datasets '.  
If no amplitude or intensity are not found in the dataset, an error 
message will be shown.


For a safe conversion, please always use the 'Semi-automatic MTZ 
conversion to mmCIF', instead of the 'auto mode'.


Best regards,
Huanwang


Dialing Pretty wrote:

Dear All,
 
I am trying to convert a PDB and the corresponding mtz file to the 
mmcif file, and I got the following message:
 
*Converting structure factor to mmCIF format
*Error! No labels are written for MTZ to mmCIF conversion Structure 
factor conversion is done.
Header of the mtz file can be seen from here 
http://sf-tool.rcsb.org/users_data/dir_14250/mtzdmp_new.log
*Click here to see the converted mmCIF file 
http://sf-tool.rcsb.org/users_data/dir_14250/sf_14250.inp.mmCIF*.
 
Will you please tell me how to solve the problem Error! No labels are 
written for MTZ to mmCIF conversion Structure factor conversion is done?
 
Cheers,
 
Dialing


Re: [ccp4bb] [phenixbb] what to do with disordered side chains

2011-03-31 Thread Huanwang Yang
If a part of sequence has no density, this part will be cut from 
coordinates.
If the side chain of a residue is  lack of density, the opinion is not 
converged.

What about the ligand, if no density is observed?

Huanwang

Ed Pozharski wrote:

The results of the online survey on what to do with disordered side
chains (from total of 240 responses):

Delete the atoms 43%
Let refinement take care of it by inflating B-factors41%
Set occupancy to zero12%
Other 4%

Other suggestions were:

- Place atoms in most likely spot based on rotomer and contacts and
indicate high positional sigmas on ATMSIG records
- To invent refinement that will spread this residues over many rotamers
as this is what actually happened
- Delet the atoms but retain the original amino acid name
- choose the most common rotamer (B-factors don't inflate, they just
rise slightly)
- Depends. if the disordered region is unteresting, delete atoms.
Otherwise, try to model it in one or more disordered model (and then
state it clearly in the pdb file)
- In case that no density is in the map, model several conformations of
the missing segment and insert it into the PDB file with zero
occupancies. It is equivalent what the NMR people do. 
- Model it in and compare the MD simulations with SAXS

- I would assumne Dale Tronrod suggestion the best. Sigatm labels.
- Let the refinement inflate B-factors, then set occupancy to zero in
the last round.

Thanks to all for participation,

Ed.

  


Re: [ccp4bb] PDB Submission of SAD data.

2009-03-24 Thread Huanwang Yang

Dear Francis
You do not have to tell which columns were used for refinement. The 
program should pick FP/SIGFP. You can deposit the foo.mmcif and your 
coordinate to the PDB. 
The alternative to convert/validate your mtz file is to use the server 
http://pdb-extract.rcsb.org/auto-check/ . It is easy to use. Also the 
web  page is updated faster than the standard alone program.


Regards,
Huanwang


Francis E Reyes wrote:

I have a mtz from Autosol/resolve that has the following columns:
OVERALL FILE STATISTICS for resolution range   0.002 -   0.261
 ===


 Col SortMinMaxNum  % Mean Mean   Resolution   
Type Column
 num order   Missing complete  abs.   Low
High   label


   1 ASC  0  37  0  100.00 18.7 18.7  23.68   
1.96   H  H
   2 NONE 0  25  0  100.00  7.3  7.3  23.68   
1.96   H  K
   3 NONE 0  58  0  100.00 20.5 20.5  23.68   
1.96   H  L
   4 NONE2.3   316.2 0  100.0020.3920.39  23.68   
1.96   F  FP
   5 NONE0.117.2 0  100.00 1.77 1.77  23.68   
1.96   Q  SIGFP
   6 NONE -180.0   180.0 0  100.00 6.2489.14  23.68   
1.96   P  PHIM
   7 NONE  0.000   0.998 0  100.000.2830.283  23.68   
1.96   W  FOMM
   8 NONE  -10.911.8 0  100.00 0.01 0.46  23.68   
1.96   A  HLAM
   9 NONE  -10.720.6 0  100.00 0.00 0.46  23.68   
1.96   A  HLBM
  10 NONE   -4.1 4.5 0  100.00-0.00 0.08  23.68   
1.96   A  HLCM
  11 NONE   -3.5 3.1 0  100.00 0.00 0.07  23.68   
1.96   A  HLDM
  12 NONE0.0 1.0 0  100.00 0.10 0.10  23.68   
1.96   I  FreeR_flag
  13 BOTH0.0 0.0 0  100.00 0.00 0.00  23.68   
1.96   F  FC



Should I just prepare my mmcif by pdb_extract_sf -dt F -dp MTZ -c 1 -w 
1 -iDAT exptl_fobs_phases_freeR_flags.mtz -o foo.mmcif  and submit 
foo.mmcif to the PDB?
Do i need to separately indicate which columns (in my case FP/SIGFP) 
were used for refinement?


Thanks

FR

-
Francis Reyes M.Sc.
215 UCB
University of Colorado at Boulder

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 67BA8D5D

8AE2 F2F4 90F7 9640 28BC  686F 78FD 6669 67BA 8D5D



--

*Huanwang Yang  Ph.D.  *
* RCSB Protein Data Bank   *
* Dep. of Chemistry  Chemical Biology, Rutgers University *
* 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8087   *
* Phone: (732)-445-0103 (ext 240);  Fax: (732)-445-4320*