Re: [ccp4bb] Plastic and glass plates

2012-08-30 Thread Tadeusz Skarzynski

Also, plastic plates are suitable for in-situ diffraction tests where glass 
ones cannot be used due to the high absorption of X-rays by glass.

Best wishes,

Tadeusz


From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Jim 
Fairman
Sent: 29 August 2012 21:19
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Plastic and glass plates

Theresa,

The major advantage of the plastic plates is indeed ease of harvest.  However, 
the plastic plates also tend to have some evaporation issues and eventually dry 
out after a few months, where as the glass plates basically last forever.  On 
the other hand, protein crystals in LCP tend to form in the first several weeks 
after an experiment is set up so this usually isn't a problem.  Some people 
prefer to set up initial screening experiments in the glass plates and then 
optimize and set up farm trays using the plastic plates where it's easier to 
harvest from (and cheaper).  I've also set up everything in plastic trays from 
the start of a project to finish without any problems.  If you're looking to 
perform LCP FRAP experiments, glass is the best way to go.

Cheers, Jim
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Theresa Hsu 
theresah...@live.commailto:theresah...@live.com wrote:
Dear all

Is there any pros and cons of using plastic plates for LCP crystallization? The 
glass is clearer but it is very difficult to open.

Thank you.



--
Jim Fairman, Ph D.
Crystal Core Leader I
Emerald BioStructureshttp://www.emeraldbiostructures.com/
Tel: 206-780-8914
Cell: 240-479-6575
E-mail: fairman@gmail.commailto:fairman@gmail.com 
jfair...@embios.commailto:jfair...@embios.com



Re: [ccp4bb] Phaser Fatal runtime error.

2012-06-27 Thread Tadeusz Skarzynski
Dear Steve,

The mtz file produced by the current version of CrysAlisPro is scaled but 
unmerged and requires SCALA to produce the merged data set. The new version of 
CrysAlisPro (currently under testing) will generate the merged mtz file as well.

With regards,

Tadeusz
Agilent Technologies


From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Jan 
Dohnalek
Sent: 27 June 2012 07:30
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Phaser Fatal runtime error.

Data from Crysalis in mtz format are not merged I think - you have to go 
through the scale and merge step in Scala first ...

Jan Dohnalek

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Steiner, Roberto 
roberto.stei...@kcl.ac.ukmailto:roberto.stei...@kcl.ac.uk wrote:
Don't know where the exact problem is. However, it is definitely possible to 
use a Crysalis-Scala-Truncate-Phaser pipeline without runtime errors. I have 
done a few times.
I am sure you will be able to get help from Agilent people. If not, feel free 
to get back to me.

Best
Roberto


On 26 Jun 2012, at 18:34, Stephen Carr wrote:

 Dear CCP4bb

 I have collected a data-set using the supernova x-ray generator from Agilent 
 and taken the mtz file generated by the data processing software in crysalis 
 pro forward for structure solution.  The data collection was straight forward 
 and the software seemingly processed the data successfully - space-group 
 P2221, overall Rmerge 9%, I/sigmaI 11, redundancy 4.5 etc.  Truncate 
 converted the intensities to structure factors with no problems, but when I 
 tried to use the data for molecular replacement with Phaser it produced the 
 following error:

 FATAL RUNTIME ERROR: Reflections are not a unique set by symmetry

 I'm not sure how to proceed from here as other programs in the suite do not 
 seem to detect this problem.  Also when this error has been mentioned in the 
 past on the bb it was with a data set collected on a Bruker home source and 
 the data processed with Denzo/scalepack, and the suggested solution was to 
 use the Bruker software to process the data.

 I am currently attempting to reprocess the data with mosflm, but that is 
 likely to be the subject of another post!

 Any suggestions will be gratefully received.

 Best wishes,

 Steve

 Dr Stephen Carr
 Research Complex at Harwell (RCaH)
 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
 Harwell Oxford
 Didcot
 Oxon OX11 0FA
 United Kingdom
 Email stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.ukmailto:stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk
 tel 01235 567717
Roberto Steiner, PhD
Group Leader
Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics
King's College London

Room 3.10A
New Hunt's House
Guy's Campus
SE1 1UL, London, UK
Tel 0044-20-78488216
Fax 0044-20-78486435
roberto.stei...@kcl.ac.ukmailto:roberto.stei...@kcl.ac.uk



--
Jan Dohnalek, Ph.D
Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
Heyrovskeho nam. 2
16206 Praha 6
Czech Republic

Tel: +420 296 809 340
Fax: +420 296 809 410


[ccp4bb] Application Scientist position at Agilent Technologies (formerly Oxford Diffraction), Yarnton, UK

2011-02-09 Thread Tadeusz Skarzynski

The Agilent Technologies' X-ray Diffraction department, located in Yarnton near 
Oxford, is looking for an Application Scientist to join a small team of 
highly-skilled chemical and macromolecular crystallographers.

Your principle activities within the team will include macromolecular X-ray 
data-collection and data-processing demonstrations to potential customers at 
our Yarnton lab and at external sites. You will also visit our new customers to 
provide user training to help them to get the most out of our X-ray equipment 
and software. You will also use your problem solving skills to solve their 
experimental and data-processing issues.

You will be expected to carry out experiments to test new technologies and 
methods in the macromolecular X-ray data collection area in support of the 
Agilent Research and Development effort.

You will be also involved in pre-sales and marketing activities, including 
demos and presentation at crystallographic conferences, and at potential 
customer sites. Extensive travelling within Europe and world-wide is an 
essential part of the job.

Preference will be given to scientists who have hands-on experience in the use 
of X-ray systems and a high level of understanding of data collection and 
processing methods. Ph.D. in the field of chemical or macromolecular 
crystallography and a few years of experience involving X-ray data collection 
and processing are required.

In addition to a solid scientific background, excellent communication and 
presentations skills as well as the ability to work efficiently with a team to 
tight schedules are essential.

Interested? Send your CV to   
emma_dubaniew...@non.agilent.commailto:emma_dubaniew...@non.agilent.com.

For informal enquiries contact 
tadeusz.skarzyn...@agilent.commailto:tadeusz.skarzyn...@agilent.com

To find out more about Agilent X-ray products google: agilent crystallography

Tadeusz Skarzynski
Product Manager - Protein Crystallography
Agilent Technologies
Yarnton




Re: [ccp4bb] Finding Chlorine =)

2007-11-29 Thread Tadeusz Skarzynski
Dear Elisabetta,
Which program did you use for refinement?
If you used REFMAC, the atomic scattering factors are internally coded for 
copper radiation, and the resulting electron density map after refinement 
may be much lower for halide atoms than it should be!
It is a known REFMAC issue.
Tadeusz




Sabini, Elisabetta [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: CCP4 bulletin board CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
29-Nov-2007 21:40
Please respond to Sabini, Elisabetta [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
To
CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
cc

Subject
[ccp4bb] Finding Chlorine =)






Dear all,

I am refining two structures which have in the active site a ligand
containing a covalent bond between a carbon and a chlorine atom.

I collected the data at APS, SERCAT ID-22.

Because of radiation damage I tried different occupancy values for the
chlorine atom and structure number #1 is best with occupancy 0.2 while
structure #2 seems to be happy with occupancy 0 (occupancy for the rest of
the ligand is 1).

I checked by mass spec if my compound has the molecular weight expected
with a chlorine atom and it does, so the original compound was correct.

Can radiation damage make the chlorine completely disappear?

Do the different occupancy values I get depend also on the resolution?
In fact:

Structure # 1 (OCC=0.2) refined to 1.8A (Rfact/Rfree=20/25%)
Structure # 2 (OCC=0.0) refined to 2.5A (Rfact/Rfree=23/33%)


When I make the figures for publication, do I draw the ligand with or
without chlorine?

Thanks,

Eli =)


-- 
Elisabetta Sabini, Ph.D.
Research Assistant Professor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics
Molecular Biology Research Building, Rm. 1108
900 South Ashland Avenue
Chicago, IL 60607
U.S.A.

Tel: (312) 996-6299
Fax: (312) 355-4535
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a 
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The 
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
---