Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic: Flourescence anisotropy measurement

2017-07-21 Thread Toth, Eric
With this type of behavior, one suspicion is that you didn’t let the reaction 
come to equilibrium prior to taking the measurement and the variability between 
time of mixing and measuring between individual replicates is introducing extra 
variability. Take a concentration at which you know there is a significant 
signal change and measure the polarization every few minutes for an hour. You 
might find that you need to pre-incubate the samples for an extended time prior 
to taking measurements.

With that said, my first suspicion is that you have lousy binding.

Eric


From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Mohammad 
Khan
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 9:33 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Off topic: Flourescence anisotropy measurement

Dear all,

I am trying to measure the difference in polarization upon the binding of the 
DNA to my protein. I take 1-5 nM of Cy3-labelled DNA and add varying dilutions 
of my protein to it (100 microM to 1 nM). I do get a decrease in difference of 
polarization with decrease in protein concentration. However, the results are 
difficult to reproduce and also vary greatly within triplicates of an 
experiment.

Similar observations have been observed by my colleagues with their proteins.

Are there any tips or precautions to keep in mind while setting up these 
reactions?

Looking forward for suggestions.

Thank you.


[ccp4bb] Postdoctoral Position at the Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research

2014-12-02 Thread Toth, Eric
Dear crystallographic community



The Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research (IBBR) at the 
University of Maryland is seeking a highly motivated postdoctoral fellow. We 
are seeking an individual with an interest in protein engineering and 
structural biology to participate in a new IBBR initiative in conjunction with 
the Center for Biomolecular Therapeutics (CBT).



IBBR is a joint research institute, which brings together partner institutions 
including the University of Maryland College Park (UMCP), University of 
Maryland Baltimore (UMB) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology 
(NIST), and is geographically located at the nexus of these institutions and in 
the hub of Maryland's biotechnology corridor (www.ibbr.umd.edu). The mission of 
IBBR is to conduct groundbreaking biomolecular and measurement science research 
to generate innovative technologies and solutions for medical and public health 
applications. IBBR is committed to providing an exceptional environment for 
specialized training and to mentoring tomorrow's biotechnology workforce.



Interested applicants can apply at the following link:



https://ejobs.umd.edu/postings/30999





Regards,



Eric





_

Eric A. Toth, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
University of Maryland School of Medicine

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center

Section Leader, Structural Biology
Center for Biomolecular Therapeutics

9600 Gudelsky Drive
Rockville, MD 20850

Email: et...@som.umaryland.edu
Phone: x-240-314-6516

Faculty 
Profilehttp://medschool.umaryland.edu/FACULTYRESEARCHPROFILE/viewprofile.aspx?id=8032









_

Eric A. Toth, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
University of Maryland School of Medicine

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center

Section Leader, Structural Biology
Center for Biomolecular Therapeutics

9600 Gudelsky Drive
Rockville, MD 20850

Email: et...@som.umaryland.edu
Phone: x-240-314-6516

Faculty 
Profilehttp://medschool.umaryland.edu/FACULTYRESEARCHPROFILE/viewprofile.aspx?id=8032









Re: [ccp4bb] Issue with Molecules per Asymmetric Unit for Molecular Replacement

2014-05-15 Thread Toth, Eric
Have you tried fixing the molecule that looks correct and searching for others? 
You might have greater than one but less than 9 molecules per ASU.

When you do this, try imposing severe restraints on the packing function. This 
worked for me in Phaser with a difficult case. My anecdotal experience is that, 
when you have lots of molecules per asu, the correct solution gets swamped by 
poorly-packed solutions if the default packing penalties are used.

Good luck.

Sent from my iPhone

 On May 15, 2014, at 6:50 PM, Matthew Bratkowski mab...@cornell.edu wrote:
 
 Hello all,
 
 
 I am working on the structure of a small protein in space group P212121.  The 
 protein is monomeric in solution based on gel filtration analysis.  The 
 Matthews Coefficeint program indicates that 9-10 molecules per asymmetric 
 unit results in ~50% solvent content, while 1 molecule per asymmetric unit 
 results in ~95% solvent. 
 
  I tried molecular replacement with a search model which is essentially 
 identical in sequence to my protein, and searched for 9 or 10 molecules/asu.  
 Using MolRep with 9 or 10 molecules/asu, I get poor contrast scores around 
 1-1.5.  However, when using Phaser, I get a solution with one molecules/asu.  
 Likewise, when I went back and tried MolRep with 1 molecule/asu, I got a 
 contrast score of 3.12.  This model still has some issues, but looks more 
 correct compaired to models created with 9 or 10  molecules/asu. 
 
 It seems highly unlikely that a crystal would contain 95% solvent, but is 
 there any possiblility that this could be the case?  Assuming that the 
 Matthews coefficient is correct, does anyone have an idea why MR seems to 
 work better for 1 molecule/asu with 95% solvent content compared to 9-10 
 molecules with 50% solvent content? Alternatively, is there any reason why 
 the Matthews coefficient could be calculating incorrectly?  Any suggestions 
 would be helpful.
 
 Thanks,
 Matt  


Re: [ccp4bb] Spots not getting indexed properly in protein-DNA complex

2013-08-01 Thread Toth, Eric
That looks like a garden variety mosaic/kinda-crappy crystal. Without being 
there, it's impossible to tell if it was morphology (e.g. cracks and divots, 
etc.), crystal handling, or just bad luck. The bottom line is you need better 
data. The good news is that those crystals diffract to a reasonably good 
resolution on your home source. The bad news is that the data you have in hand 
are probably not that useful. It might be a case of just trying 50 crystals 
before you get a good one or you might have to modify your cryo, crystal 
growth, etc.

Good luck.

_
Eric A. Toth, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center
University of Maryland School of Medicine
108 North Greene St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

Email: et...@som.umaryland.edumailto:etoth...@umaryland.edu
Phone: x-410-706-5345
Fax: x-410-706-8297
http://medschool.umaryland.edu/FACULTYRESEARCHPROFILE/viewprofile.aspx?id=8032
http://crystal.umaryland.eduhttp://crystal.umaryland.edu/

[Description: Description: Description: UMSOM New logo]
 A Third Century
Where Discovery Transforms Medicine


From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Appu kumar
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 9:45 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Spots not getting indexed properly in protein-DNA complex

Dear all ccp4 user,
 We have collected a data set of 370 frames with 0.5 OSC for a protein-DNA 
complex on RAXIS IV detector. The spots look mostly clustered from 50A to 6A 
region but the whole data is completely spreaded to 2.8A. There are many spots 
which are very near to each other as if they were merged but closely placed. 
When we are trying to index the data, its not picking all the spots correctly 
and giving a unit cell dimension variable from 150 to 500A in one of the axis. 
Rest two axis axes of unit cell are almost similar ~ 55A, 111A. We tried 
processing with HKL2000 but not able to index it., I am attaching four 4 images 
for every 90 degree frames collected. Please look at these images and give your 
valuable input regarding indexing problem.
your suggestions and support will be highly appreciated. Please guide me and 
help me sorting out the problem.

Thank you



inline: image001.jpg

Re: [ccp4bb] completeness in scala

2012-05-15 Thread Toth, Eric
In sports, maximal effort is considered to be 110%, so you're actually 9.9% 
short of getting everything you could out of that crystal at its resolution 
limit.  All things considered, that's not bad.


_
Eric A. Toth, Ph.D. 
Assistant Professor 
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 
Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center 
University of Maryland School of Medicine 
108 North Greene St. 
Baltimore, MD 21201 

Email: et...@som.umaryland.edu 
Phone: x-410-706-5345 
Fax: x-410-706-8297
http://medschool.umaryland.edu/FACULTYRESEARCHPROFILE/viewprofile.aspx?id=8032
http://crystal.umaryland.edu 


 A Third Century
    Where Discovery Transforms Medicine



-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Ed 
Pozharski
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 1:51 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] completeness in scala

Just a curiosity - I have a dataset at 1.45A for which SCALA reports the 
highest resolution shell completeness at 100.1%.  I am impressed :-)


--
Hurry up before we all come back to our senses!
   Julian, King of Lemurs