Dear Niu,

To me, it looks like random density. Since coot contours are based on sigma 
levels, you will always see features. I do not think you can do anything with 
your current map. As others have said, it is always a good idea to test ALL 
possible space groups, even if you are convinced it is P2. It only takes CPU 
time and, compared to trying to build in uninterpretable maps, very little time 
of yourself. Make sure to run the jobs in different directories, so the results 
do not get mixed up.

The other thing to do would be to look at the diffraction images: are all spots 
sharp, or are some spots smeared? Are the spots with even L much stronger then 
the spots with odd L? Is your off-origin peak at c=0.5 (fractional) or at some 
random position? How many molecules do you expect based on a Matthews 
calculation? Are you sure the protein in the crystals is the protein you think 
it is?

Since P2 is a very low-symmetry space group, the first thing I would do is to 
process the data in P1 and run Phaser in P1. In that case you do not have to 
worry about the space group etc. Once you get a solution, you can use Zanuda to 
find the correct space group.

If you have a pseudo-translation (all L=odd reflections weak), you could also 
consider processing the data with the c-axis forced to be half the current 
length and running molecular replacement with that data. The solution will be 
approximate but can give you valuable information about the true packing. With 
an off-origin peak of 95% of the origin peak, the solution will not be far off.

Good luck!
Herman


Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Niu Tou
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. November 2013 00:58
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] Weird MR result

Dear Phil,
I used PHASER to do the task. I have double checked and  both files have the 
same prefix, so they are from the same output. I have also checked the headers 
again, they have the same spacegroup. Actually I was trying to search for two 
different molecules but only one was found. The spacegeoup is P2 and I am quite 
sure it is not P21 from system absence.
One possibility is that the space group was wrong, since there is a 95% off 
origin peak. There are several choices from data processing, P1, P2, C2 C222, 
all have this large off origin peak. I wonder if this 95% peak can tell some 
information?

It will not surprise me if this result is incorrect, however how could these 
regular density be?
Best,
Niu

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Phil Jeffrey 
<pjeff...@princeton.edu<mailto:pjeff...@princeton.edu>> wrote:
Hello Niu,

1.  We need extra information.  What program did you use ?  What's the 
similarity (e.g. % identity) of your model.  What's your space group ? Did you 
try ALL the space groups in your point group in ALL the permutations (e.g. in 
primitive orthorhombic there are 8 possibilities).

1a.  My best guess on limited info is that you've got a partial solution in the 
wrong space group with only part of the molecules at their correct position.

2.  I recently had a very unusual case where I could solve a structure in 
EITHER P41212 or P43212 with similar statistics, but that I would see 
interpenetrating electron density for a second, partial occupancy molecule no 
matter which of these space groups I tried (and it showed this when I expanded 
the data to P1).  Might conceivably be a 2:1 enantiomorphic twin, in 
retrospect, but we obtained a more friendly crystal form.  I hope you don't 
have something like that, but it's possible.

Phil Jeffrey
Princeton


On 11/14/13 5:22 PM, Niu Tou wrote:
Dear All,

I have a strange MR case which do not know how to interpret, I wonder if
any one had similar experiences.

The output model does not fit into the map at all, as shown in picture
1, however the map still looks good in part regions. From picture 2 we
can see even clear alpha helix. I guess this could not be due to some
random density, and I have tried to do MR with a irrelevant model
without producing such kind of regular secondary structure.

This data has a long c axis, and in most parts the density are still not
interpretable. I do not know if this is a good starting point. Could any
one give some suggestions? Many thanks!

Best,
Niu



Reply via email to