Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Ian Tickle
; 0.50 27.65 N
> >
> > ATOM 2355 CA ATHR A 279 136.909 167.684 153.607 0.50 28.45 C
> >
> > ATOM 2356 C ATHR A 279 135.937 167.731 154.799 0.50 31.92 C
> >
> > ATOM 2357 O ATHR A 279 136.426 167.682 155.949 0.50 32.52 O
> >
> > ATOM 2358 CB ATHR A 279 136.906 166.273 153.009 0.50 27.04 C
> >
> > ATOM 2359 OG1ATHR A 279 137.119 165.333 154.066 0.50 28.59 O
> >
> > ATOM 2360 CG2ATHR A 279 137.957 166.077 151.931 0.50 27.69 C
> >
> > ATOM 2361 N BLYS A 279 138.238 168.081 154.020 0.50 32.20 N
> >
> > ATOM 2362 CA BLYS A 279 136.870 167.701 153.585 0.50 36.51 C
> >
> > ATOM 2363 C BLYS A 279 135.930 167.793 154.787 0.50 38.18 C
> >
> > ATOM 2364 O BLYS A 279 136.377 168.014 155.910 0.50 42.23 O
> >
> > ATOM 2365 CB BLYS A 279 136.887 166.298 152.984 0.50 40.70 C
> >
> > ATOM 2366 CG BLYS A 279 137.909 166.091 151.872 0.50 46.05 C
> >
> > ATOM 2367 CD BLYS A 279 138.177 164.645 151.591 0.50 50.67 C
> >
> > ATOM 2368 CE BLYS A 279 139.166 164.047 152.568 0.50 59.69 C
> >
> > ATOM 2369 NZ BLYS A 279 140.515 163.892 151.967 0.50 59.05 N
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In case 1 OD1 A is immediately followed bu OD1B
> >
> >
> > In second case - all As listed then all Bs
> >
> >
> > Eleanor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 14:34, Robbie Joosten <
> robbie_joos...@hotmail.com <mailto:robbie_joos...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ian,
> >
> > AFAIK there is no clean solution for this and I imagine this
> problem goes very deep into the internal representation of the model in
> REFMAC. That said, 1 in 6 missing PDB-REDO entries is caused by this
> problem, so a solution would be very welcome.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Robbie
> >
> >  > -Original Message-
> >  > From: CCP4 bulletin board  CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>> On Behalf Of Ian
> >  > Tickle
> >  > Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 15:02
> >  > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> >  > Subject: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Dear All
> >  >
> >  > I just downloaded a PDB file (7A5V) from the EBI server,
> tried to run Refmac
> >  > on it and got the error:
> >  >
> >  > ERROR: in chain A residue: 279 different residues have the
> same number
> >  > There is an error in the input coordinate file
> >  >
> >  > At least one the chains has 2 residues with the same number
> ===> Error:
> >  > Problem with coordinate file
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > and indeed residue A279 has:
> >  >
> >  > ATOM   2354  N  ATHR A 279 138.241 168.068 154.050  0.50
> 27.65   N
> >  >
> >  > and
> >  > ATOM   2361  N  BLYS A 279 138.238 168.081 154.020  0.50
> 32.20   N
> >  > and the same for all the other atoms in the residues.
> >  >
> >  > Searching the CCP4BB archives for "microheterogeneity" I see
> that this has
> >  > been discussed before and apparently it should "just work" if
> there are alt
> >  > atom indicators (check) and occupancies add up to <= 1
> (check).  I must say I
> >  > also was of the impression that it "just worked" so I'm a bit
> confused now
> >  > why it doesn't.
> >  >
> >  > Version info:

Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Keitaro Yamashita
5.910 0.50 42.23 O

ATOM 2365 CB BLYS A 279 136.887 166.298 152.984 0.50 40.70 C

ATOM 2366 CG BLYS A 279 137.909 166.091 151.872 0.50 46.05 C

ATOM 2367 CD BLYS A 279 138.177 164.645 151.591 0.50 50.67 C

ATOM 2368 CE BLYS A 279 139.166 164.047 152.568 0.50 59.69 C

ATOM 2369 NZ BLYS A 279 140.515 163.892 151.967 0.50 59.05 N




In case 1 OD1 A is immediately followed bu OD1B


In second case - all As listed then all Bs


Eleanor




On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 14:34, Robbie Joosten mailto:robbie_joos...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Ian,

AFAIK there is no clean solution for this and I imagine this problem 
goes very deep into the internal representation of the model in REFMAC. That 
said, 1 in 6 missing PDB-REDO entries is caused by this problem, so a solution 
would be very welcome.

Cheers,
Robbie

 > -Original Message-
 > From: CCP4 bulletin board mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>> On Behalf Of Ian
 > Tickle
 > Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 15:02
     > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
 > Subject: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?
 >
 >
 > Dear All
 >
 > I just downloaded a PDB file (7A5V) from the EBI server, tried to 
run Refmac
 > on it and got the error:
 >
 > ERROR: in chain A residue: 279 different residues have the same 
number
 > There is an error in the input coordinate file
 >
 > At least one the chains has 2 residues with the same number ===> 
Error:
 > Problem with coordinate file
 >
 >
 > and indeed residue A279 has:
 >
 > ATOM   2354  N  ATHR A 279     138.241 168.068 154.050  0.50 27.65   
        N
 >
 > and
 > ATOM   2361  N  BLYS A 279     138.238 168.081 154.020  0.50 32.20   
        N
 > and the same for all the other atoms in the residues.
 >
 > Searching the CCP4BB archives for "microheterogeneity" I see that 
this has
 > been discussed before and apparently it should "just work" if there 
are alt
 > atom indicators (check) and occupancies add up to <= 1 (check).  I 
must say I
 > also was of the impression that it "just worked" so I'm a bit 
confused now
 > why it doesn't.
 >
 > Version info:
 > DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"
 > ### CCP4 7.1.008: Refmac          version 5.8.0267 : 24/08/20##
 >
 > Is there some other hack I need to do to get it to work?
 >
 > Cheers
 >
 > -- Ian
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > 
 >
 >
 > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
 > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1 
<https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1>




To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1 
<https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1>

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB 
<http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB>, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk 
<http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk>, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ <https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/>



-

Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Ian Tickle
Sorry Eleanor, same problem in 'interleaved' order (except for 2 extra
atoms in LYS).

Strangely the error message is now repeated 91 times, even though there are
only 16 atoms (7+9) in the 2 residues: previously I only got the message
once !

Guess I must have imagined that it worked - it's called 'expectation bias' !

Thanks anyway.

-- Ian


On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 18:34, Eleanor Dodson <
176a9d5ebad7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:

> Only a hunch but this works:
>
> ATOM 1036 OD1AASN A 172 -7.722 13.371 -18.195 0.50 5.12 O
>
> ATOM 1037 OD1BASN A 172 -7.152 14.800 -15.791 0.50 7.63 O
>
>
> And here you have:ATOM 2354 N ATHR A 279 138.241 168.068 154.050 0.50
> 27.65 N
>
> ATOM 2355 CA ATHR A 279 136.909 167.684 153.607 0.50 28.45 C
>
> ATOM 2356 C ATHR A 279 135.937 167.731 154.799 0.50 31.92 C
>
> ATOM 2357 O ATHR A 279 136.426 167.682 155.949 0.50 32.52 O
>
> ATOM 2358 CB ATHR A 279 136.906 166.273 153.009 0.50 27.04 C
>
> ATOM 2359 OG1ATHR A 279 137.119 165.333 154.066 0.50 28.59 O
>
> ATOM 2360 CG2ATHR A 279 137.957 166.077 151.931 0.50 27.69 C
>
> ATOM 2361 N BLYS A 279 138.238 168.081 154.020 0.50 32.20 N
>
> ATOM 2362 CA BLYS A 279 136.870 167.701 153.585 0.50 36.51 C
>
> ATOM 2363 C BLYS A 279 135.930 167.793 154.787 0.50 38.18 C
>
> ATOM 2364 O BLYS A 279 136.377 168.014 155.910 0.50 42.23 O
>
> ATOM 2365 CB BLYS A 279 136.887 166.298 152.984 0.50 40.70 C
>
> ATOM 2366 CG BLYS A 279 137.909 166.091 151.872 0.50 46.05 C
>
> ATOM 2367 CD BLYS A 279 138.177 164.645 151.591 0.50 50.67 C
>
> ATOM 2368 CE BLYS A 279 139.166 164.047 152.568 0.50 59.69 C
>
> ATOM 2369 NZ BLYS A 279 140.515 163.892 151.967 0.50 59.05 N
>
>
>
>
> In case 1 OD1 A is immediately followed bu OD1B
>
>
> In second case - all As listed then all Bs
>
>
> Eleanor
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 14:34, Robbie Joosten 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> AFAIK there is no clean solution for this and I imagine this problem goes
>> very deep into the internal representation of the model in REFMAC. That
>> said, 1 in 6 missing PDB-REDO entries is caused by this problem, so a
>> solution would be very welcome.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Robbie
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: CCP4 bulletin board  On Behalf Of Ian
>> > Tickle
>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 15:02
>> > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>> > Subject: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear All
>> >
>> > I just downloaded a PDB file (7A5V) from the EBI server, tried to run
>> Refmac
>> > on it and got the error:
>> >
>> > ERROR: in chain A residue: 279 different residues have the same number
>> > There is an error in the input coordinate file
>> >
>> > At least one the chains has 2 residues with the same number ===> Error:
>> > Problem with coordinate file
>> >
>> >
>> > and indeed residue A279 has:
>> >
>> > ATOM   2354  N  ATHR A 279 138.241 168.068 154.050  0.50 27.65
>>  N
>> >
>> > and
>> > ATOM   2361  N  BLYS A 279 138.238 168.081 154.020  0.50 32.20
>>  N
>> > and the same for all the other atoms in the residues.
>> >
>> > Searching the CCP4BB archives for "microheterogeneity" I see that this
>> has
>> > been discussed before and apparently it should "just work" if there are
>> alt
>> > atom indicators (check) and occupancies add up to <= 1 (check).  I must
>> say I
>> > also was of the impression that it "just worked" so I'm a bit confused
>> now
>> > why it doesn't.
>> >
>> > Version info:
>> > DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"
>> > ### CCP4 7.1.008: Refmac  version 5.8.0267 : 24/08/20##
>> >
>> > Is there some other hack I need to do to get it to work?
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > -- Ian
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>> > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>>
>> This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a
>> mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are
>> available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
>>
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Eleanor Dodson
Only a hunch but this works:

ATOM 1036 OD1AASN A 172 -7.722 13.371 -18.195 0.50 5.12 O

ATOM 1037 OD1BASN A 172 -7.152 14.800 -15.791 0.50 7.63 O


And here you have:ATOM 2354 N ATHR A 279 138.241 168.068 154.050 0.50 27.65
N

ATOM 2355 CA ATHR A 279 136.909 167.684 153.607 0.50 28.45 C

ATOM 2356 C ATHR A 279 135.937 167.731 154.799 0.50 31.92 C

ATOM 2357 O ATHR A 279 136.426 167.682 155.949 0.50 32.52 O

ATOM 2358 CB ATHR A 279 136.906 166.273 153.009 0.50 27.04 C

ATOM 2359 OG1ATHR A 279 137.119 165.333 154.066 0.50 28.59 O

ATOM 2360 CG2ATHR A 279 137.957 166.077 151.931 0.50 27.69 C

ATOM 2361 N BLYS A 279 138.238 168.081 154.020 0.50 32.20 N

ATOM 2362 CA BLYS A 279 136.870 167.701 153.585 0.50 36.51 C

ATOM 2363 C BLYS A 279 135.930 167.793 154.787 0.50 38.18 C

ATOM 2364 O BLYS A 279 136.377 168.014 155.910 0.50 42.23 O

ATOM 2365 CB BLYS A 279 136.887 166.298 152.984 0.50 40.70 C

ATOM 2366 CG BLYS A 279 137.909 166.091 151.872 0.50 46.05 C

ATOM 2367 CD BLYS A 279 138.177 164.645 151.591 0.50 50.67 C

ATOM 2368 CE BLYS A 279 139.166 164.047 152.568 0.50 59.69 C

ATOM 2369 NZ BLYS A 279 140.515 163.892 151.967 0.50 59.05 N




In case 1 OD1 A is immediately followed bu OD1B


In second case - all As listed then all Bs


Eleanor




On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 14:34, Robbie Joosten 
wrote:

> Hi Ian,
>
> AFAIK there is no clean solution for this and I imagine this problem goes
> very deep into the internal representation of the model in REFMAC. That
> said, 1 in 6 missing PDB-REDO entries is caused by this problem, so a
> solution would be very welcome.
>
> Cheers,
> Robbie
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: CCP4 bulletin board  On Behalf Of Ian
> > Tickle
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 15:02
> > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > Subject: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?
> >
> >
> > Dear All
> >
> > I just downloaded a PDB file (7A5V) from the EBI server, tried to run
> Refmac
> > on it and got the error:
> >
> > ERROR: in chain A residue: 279 different residues have the same number
> > There is an error in the input coordinate file
> >
> > At least one the chains has 2 residues with the same number ===> Error:
> > Problem with coordinate file
> >
> >
> > and indeed residue A279 has:
> >
> > ATOM   2354  N  ATHR A 279 138.241 168.068 154.050  0.50 27.65
>  N
> >
> > and
> > ATOM   2361  N  BLYS A 279 138.238 168.081 154.020  0.50 32.20
>  N
> > and the same for all the other atoms in the residues.
> >
> > Searching the CCP4BB archives for "microheterogeneity" I see that this
> has
> > been discussed before and apparently it should "just work" if there are
> alt
> > atom indicators (check) and occupancies add up to <= 1 (check).  I must
> say I
> > also was of the impression that it "just worked" so I'm a bit confused
> now
> > why it doesn't.
> >
> > Version info:
> > DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"
> > ### CCP4 7.1.008: Refmac  version 5.8.0267 : 24/08/20##
> >
> > Is there some other hack I need to do to get it to work?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > -- Ian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>
>
> 
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>
> This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a
> mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are
> available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
>



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Robbie Joosten
Hi Ian,

AFAIK there is no clean solution for this and I imagine this problem goes very 
deep into the internal representation of the model in REFMAC. That said, 1 in 6 
missing PDB-REDO entries is caused by this problem, so a solution would be very 
welcome.

Cheers,
Robbie

> -Original Message-
> From: CCP4 bulletin board  On Behalf Of Ian
> Tickle
> Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 15:02
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: [ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?
> 
> 
> Dear All
> 
> I just downloaded a PDB file (7A5V) from the EBI server, tried to run Refmac
> on it and got the error:
> 
> ERROR: in chain A residue: 279 different residues have the same number
> There is an error in the input coordinate file
> 
> At least one the chains has 2 residues with the same number ===> Error:
> Problem with coordinate file
> 
> 
> and indeed residue A279 has:
> 
> ATOM   2354  N  ATHR A 279 138.241 168.068 154.050  0.50 27.65   N
> 
> and
> ATOM   2361  N  BLYS A 279 138.238 168.081 154.020  0.50 32.20   N
> and the same for all the other atoms in the residues.
> 
> Searching the CCP4BB archives for "microheterogeneity" I see that this has
> been discussed before and apparently it should "just work" if there are alt
> atom indicators (check) and occupancies add up to <= 1 (check).  I must say I
> also was of the impression that it "just worked" so I'm a bit confused now
> why it doesn't.
> 
> Version info:
> DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"
> ### CCP4 7.1.008: Refmac  version 5.8.0267 : 24/08/20##
> 
> Is there some other hack I need to do to get it to work?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- Ian
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1




To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


[ccp4bb] Refmac not handling microheterogeneity?

2020-12-02 Thread Ian Tickle
Dear All

I just downloaded a PDB file (7A5V) from the EBI server, tried to run
Refmac on it and got the error:

ERROR: in chain A residue: 279 different residues have the same number
There is an error in the input coordinate file
At least one the chains has 2 residues with the same number
===> Error: Problem with coordinate file

and indeed residue A279 has:

ATOM   2354  N  ATHR A 279 138.241 168.068 154.050  0.50 27.65
 N
and
ATOM   2361  N  BLYS A 279 138.238 168.081 154.020  0.50 32.20
 N
and the same for all the other atoms in the residues.

Searching the CCP4BB archives for "microheterogeneity" I see that this has
been discussed before and apparently it should "just work" if there are alt
atom indicators (check) and occupancies add up to <= 1 (check).  I must say
I also was of the impression that it "just worked" so I'm a bit confused
now why it doesn't.

Version info:
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"
### CCP4 7.1.008: Refmac  version 5.8.0267 : 24/08/20##

Is there some other hack I need to do to get it to work?

Cheers

-- Ian



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/