Re: HP1631D Logic Analyzer..Software???
On Dec 14, 2016, at 1:07 AM, Holm Tiffewrote: > As far as I know I do have an HP IEEE488 ISA Board lying around somewhere, > and I'l ltry to look at the stack of old Motherboards if I can find > something with a "higher" CPU and ISA Slots to build a Windoze computer > that can be connected to the 9121D Drive so that I can restore the > images to disks. You can interface with HP-IB equipment pretty easily with modern hardware too, you can get a GP-IB adapter that uses USB or PCIe and for which a full set of driver libraries is available fairly inexpensively. -- Chris
Re: Z-80 code question about a loop that depends on the contents of the refresh register
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Alexis Kotlowywrote: > On 14/12/2016 09:19, Ethan Dicks wrote: >> So far, this loop hangs on all three emulators I've tried - simh's >> altairz80, simcpm010 for AmigaDOS, and EMUZ80 for Raspberry Pi... > > Have you tried running it on ZEMU? (Windows only unfortunately, but > should run under WINE). > > http://www.z80.info/z80emu.htm#EMU_CPU_W32 Thanks for the tip, Alexis. It did run under ZEMU under Wine on my Mint laptop, but what an awful interface. My next goal is finding something less mousy like fixing altairz80. > I tried single stepping through it just now and it looks like it's doing > its job, at least as a possible random number generator. Yep. No tweaks. It just ran as expected under ZEMU once I got the files in there. > I can't find any information on what the MSB is set to when the > accumulator is loaded with R, and what the Sign flag is set to. The > datasheet says the Sign and Zero flags are changed by the instruction. > If either of these flags are set, the routine enters an infinite loop. The upper bit of R can be set or cleared with LD R,A but won't change state due to counter activity. I checked the program - it only does LD A,R to read the register. It never sets it. Thanks again for the tip. Once I get a few more things checked out, I'll be revealing what this is all about. I think a few people may be interested, or at least amused. -ethan
Re: HP1631D Logic Analyzer..Software???
As someone with an HP 1660cs, I'd love to see it. Do you remember the specific architecture it was for? Also, isn't 1650 software compatible with the 1660? :) Finally, is there anything I should do with my 1660cs for preservation purposes? Image the hard disk, that sort of thing? Or can it be entirely reloaded from the OS floppy images still distributed by Keysight? -- Chris Sent from my iPad > On Dec 14, 2016, at 12:52 PM, Rik Boswrote: > > Andrea, > > I've the symbol editor utility for the 1660 series. > I also have the inverse assembler development software for the 16500 and 1650 > series.(HP 10391B) > > -Rik >> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- >> Van: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] Namens shad >> Verzonden: woensdag 14 december 2016 19:36 >> Aan: cctalk >> Onderwerp: Re: HP1631D Logic Analyzer..Software??? >> >> hello, >> somewhere around I should have a floppy with disassembler for HP1660 series. >> I suppose it is useless for 1630... or not? >> Should I give a look to find it? >> >> Andrea >
Re: ADM-3A Lower case ROM issue
Am 14.12.2016 um 20:13 schrieb Steve Hatle: Original Message Subject: Re: ADM-3A Lower case ROM issue From: Jörg_HoppeDate: Wed, December 14, 2016 9:00 am To: cct...@classiccmp.org By accident, I just now restored an ADM3 (not the "A")! Lowercase ROM was made with an pin-rearranged 2706 EPROM. Additional RAM was inserted, DIP switches were set: works perfectly. However, with lowercase ROM installed and DIP switches set, but extra RAM missing, the Space "0x20" was displayed as a " ` ". So I think you have an RAM issue. Perhaps cleaning the socketed extra RAM helps? Joerg Thanks - that sounds like my symptoms exactly. I'll check out the RAM. Steve Well, there you go. The sockets for two 2102 RAM chips are empty! Anybody have a couple of these guys they can spare, or a quick pointer on where to buy them? I got mine from Bulgaria: http://www.ebay.de/itm/311745516883 Joerg Thanks all, esp. Joerg for the tip! Steve
Re: Z-80 code question about a loop that depends on the contents of the refresh register
On 12/14/16 11:33 AM, Ethan Dicks wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Alexis Kotlowywrote: On 14/12/2016 09:19, Ethan Dicks wrote: So far, this loop hangs on all three emulators I've tried - simh's altairz80, simcpm010 for AmigaDOS, and EMUZ80 for Raspberry Pi. I'm guessing none of these environments emulate specific behavior of the Refresh register? Ethan, Have you tried running it on ZEMU? I have not. Thanks for the suggestion. I don't know which emulators might implement the refresh register. (Windows only unfortunately, but should run under WINE). That's what it will take - I'm 100% UNIX/Linux (well... plus VAX and PDP-11 and Amiga and PET...) http://www.z80.info/z80emu.htm#EMU_CPU_W32 I tried single stepping through it just now and it looks like it's doing its job, at least as a possible random number generator. Excellent. I expect it should work. When was this game written? Perhaps it's supposed to lock up on emulators that don't emulate the Z80 completely? 1979. Emulators weren't a factor then. Not knowing what the game is, it could be a copy protection routine too. I don't think so. It's just generating a percentage which it's using for probability. I can't find any information on what the MSB is set to when the accumulator is loaded with R, and what the Sign flag is set to. The datasheet says the Sign and Zero flags are changed by the instruction. If either of these flags are set, the routine enters an infinite loop. Tony Duell pointed that out too. I suspect that this code works for machines that existed at the time, with 16K DRAMs, and might or might not have worked on later machines. A quick scan of InfoWorld links and such and I can't find any S-100 cards with 4164s older than about 1983. I don't think there were many commercially available 64K DRAMs prior to 1982. -ethan The first year of appearance for 64K DRAMS was mid to late 1980 (expensive and scarce) and mostly sampling to the big vendors. For regular users late 81 when the price started down. There were three flavors, 8bit refresh, 7bit refresh, and internal refresh came in a bit later by maybe mid 1982. Adoption was a bit slow due to cost and Alpha particle concerns with soft errors The Z80 could do 8bit refresh with hardware or software or the self refresh (internal). Nominally the R register is a counter that increments from any value to 7bit overflow. I believe most emulators actually do that. Check MyZ80 Simon Crans work (32bit dos/ pre-7-winders only or in a 32bit sim/VM). Either that or lookup and assemble Grant Searle's low chip count Z80 system. Allison
Re: Z-80 code question about a loop that depends on the contents of the refresh register
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:26 PM, allisonwrote: >>> On 14/12/2016 09:19, Ethan Dicks wrote: So far, this loop hangs on all three emulators I've tried - simh's altairz80, simcpm010 for AmigaDOS, and EMUZ80 for Raspberry Pi. I'm guessing none of these environments emulate specific behavior of the Refresh register? > The first year of appearance for 64K DRAMS was mid to late 1980 (expensive > and scarce) and mostly sampling to the big vendors. For regular users late > 81 > when the price started down. Right. I was a user of 8-bit micros in that exact era. My first hands-on experience as a user was the memory inside the Commodore 64. My first engineering experience was in 1984 on a product designed in 1983 (COMBOARD-II with 128K of 4164 chips and a 74S409 refresh controller). > There were three flavors, 8bit refresh, 7bit refresh, and > internal refresh came in a bit later by maybe mid 1982. I know there were different types but not those details. Thanks. > The Z80 could do 8bit refresh with hardware or software or the self refresh > (internal). I'm also a little fuzzy on this aspect of things because I was never a Z-80 user back in the day. Software Results considered a Z-80 COMBOARD very early on, but abandonded that approach because it would have likely required 2 hex Unibus modules and so opted to hold out a few months and go with a 68000 and SRAM design on a single hex card (my old boss still has an XC68000 with S/N 424 engraved on the lid). > Nominally the R register is a counter that increments from any value to 7bit > overflow. So I'm learning. > I believe most emulators actually do that. The first three emulators I tried (simcpm010, altairz80, and EMUZ80) on three different platforms (AmigaDOS, Linux, and ARM) do not. I now have a couple of names of DOS/Windows emulators that should. I will have to run them under Wine since I'm not a Windows user. It's funny because I would have tried this on simcpm010 25 years ago (it was on the Amiga disk I just extracted all these files from) and it would have failed then just as it fails today, and then, I had *no* idea why. I've learned a lot since then because it only took me a few hours of digging to uncover why. > Check MyZ80 Simon Crans work (32bit > dos/ pre-7-winders only or in a 32bit sim/VM). I will look that up. > Either that or lookup and assemble Grant Searle's low chip count Z80 system. The worry is not running on real hardware. Once I get some time to clean up my XOR or dig out a Kaypro, I will run it on real hardware. I want to find/fix an emulator for modern machines so that other people can just grab and go. Also, this is not _just_ a Z-80 program, it's a CP/M program, with CP/M BDOS calls to open/close/read/write files and read-from/write-to the console (F_OPEN, F_CLOSE, F_READ, F_WRITE, C_READSTR, C_WRITE). Right now, I'm leaning towards fixing altairz80 first since that runs on "everything". I may also work with the author of EMUZ80 so it works on bare-metal Raspberry Pi (EMUZ80 is a Pascal app that runs in the Lazarus bare-metal framework, so you need Windows to rebuild the app). I don't mind putting known-working Windows-based emulators on a list of "verified environments", but I'm not going to push this to the public without a Mac and a Linux answer. Telling the world that they have to build a real Z-80 CP/M machine to play a game isn't going to hit a large audience. Thanks, -ethan
RE: ADM-3A Lower case ROM issue
Original Message Subject: Re: ADM-3A Lower case ROM issue From: Jörg_HoppeDate: Wed, December 14, 2016 9:00 am To: cct...@classiccmp.org By accident, I just now restored an ADM3 (not the "A")! Lowercase ROM was made with an pin-rearranged 2706 EPROM. Additional RAM was inserted, DIP switches were set: works perfectly. However, with lowercase ROM installed and DIP switches set, but extra RAM missing, the Space "0x20" was displayed as a " ` ". So I think you have an RAM issue. Perhaps cleaning the socketed extra RAM helps? Joerg Thanks - that sounds like my symptoms exactly. I'll check out the RAM. Steve Well, there you go. The sockets for two 2102 RAM chips are empty! Anybody have a couple of these guys they can spare, or a quick pointer on where to buy them? Thanks all, esp. Joerg for the tip! Steve
Re: Z-80 code question about a loop that depends on the contents of the refresh register
>> I can't find any information on what the MSB is set to when the >> accumulator is loaded with R, and what the Sign flag is set to. The >> datasheet says the Sign and Zero flags are changed by the instruction. >> If either of these flags are set, the routine enters an infinite loop. > > Tony Duell pointed that out too. I suspect that this code works for > machines that existed at the time, with 16K DRAMs, and might or might > not have worked on later machines. A quick scan of InfoWorld links The type of RAM shouldn't matter (provided it works properly...) The R register is an 8 bit register. It can be loaded from the accumulator and read back into the accumulaotr (the LD A,R instruction you see here). The bottom 7 bits of R are incremented (with wraparound from 111 to 000 ) after every instruction. The top bit is left alone. At certain times, the RFSH/ signal is asserted by the Z80, At this point all 8 bits of the R register appear on the bottom 8 bit of the address bus. (As an aside, the I register, the interrupt vector register, appears on the top half of the address bus). Ths incrementing 7 bit address is useful for refreshing those DRAMs that need 128 refresh cycles (a so-called '7 bit refresh'). There is no reason you have to use it for that, even if you have DRAM (you could make your own RAM controller, with its own refresh generator, in fact I would guess a lot of S100 RAM boards did, so they could be used with CPUs other than the Z80). The behaviour of the R register is, of course, unchanged whether you use it for RAM refresh or not. It is my guess (without looking at the datasheets) that as the LD A,R instruction has been said to affect the sign and zero flags that these behave in the obvious way. Z is set if the value loaded is zero. The sign bit is set if the high bit of R is set. If that guess is right then there is a problem. If the high bit of R is set then the routine as given will go into an infinite loop. Remember the automatic incrementing of R is only on the bottom 7 bits. What I need to do is find exactly how the flags are set by the LD A,R -tony
RE: Odd "endianness" [was Re: RE: Base 64 posts to the list]
From: Lars Brinkhoff Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 3:54 AM > Noel Chiappa wrote: >>> 9-track tapes on the PDP-10 used one of the following encodings: >> What about 7-track, any idea? I would assume 6 x 6-bit tape frames per >> 36-bit word, but that's just a guess. > A reasonable guess, and one I'd make too. But I don't know either. According to the monitor calls manuals for both Tops-10 and TOPS-20, as well as the manual specifically on tape labels etc., that's a very good guess, and a correct one. > Supposedly, many ITS backups were made to 7-track tapes. That became a > problem when the old tape drives started to fail, and available new tape > drives were only 9-track. The same issue occurred at SAIL for the early WAITS backups prior to the introduction of a KL-10 into the system (which grew from a PDP-6 to a PDP-10/PDP-6 to a KL-10/KA-10/166, then shrank to a KL-10/KA-10 down to a KL-10 only). The KL-10 had TU-78 drives on an RH20. AIUI, the older backup tapes were refrangled onto new 9-track media before the KA-10 and its drives were retired. Rich Rich Alderson Vintage Computing Sr. Systems Engineer Living Computer Museum 2245 1st Avenue S Seattle, WA 98134 mailto:ri...@livingcomputermuseum.org http://www.LivingComputerMuseum.org/
Found in data center
An old cabinet that only IBM had the key, they came by took what they wanted and left it full I only got a quick shot of what's in there .. any interest ? Located Portland, Oregon https://goo.gl/photos/rSUZ9nnxsrxN8nku5
TI 980 software?
Hi all -- The TI 980B I got from that NWA auction from a month or so ago finally made its way back to my house, and the CPU looks to be in decent shape. I'll probably start working on restoring it after the new year. Bitsavers has ample documentation, but I haven't found much software at all -- I don't suppose anyone out there's got any tucked away somewhere? I've found this: http://www.cozx.com/dpitts/ti980.html which provides a nice cross assembler/linker and simulator so I guess I can write my own :). I was hoping there'd be a bit more to the system than the CPU, but the rack it came in was effectively empty apart from the CPU, a gigantic power supply and an empty backplane and card-cage. There was a stack of documentation included, so now I know that this TI was originally part of an Evans and Sutherland "NOVOVIEW 2500" -- a "Night Only View" flight simulator that used a set of point-plotting X/Y beam-penetration displays (red/orange/amber/yellow/green colors) to simulate a runway at night. (These were the DSI displays that were auctioned off as a separate lot, wish I'd known what they were at the time...) Pretty interesting, a shame all of the cool hardware was stripped out at some point. Based on the printout stuck in the Omni 800 that came with it, this was in use through at least 2000. Thanks, - Josh
RE: HP1631D Logic Analyzer..Software???
Andrea, I've the symbol editor utility for the 1660 series. I also have the inverse assembler development software for the 16500 and 1650 series.(HP 10391B) -Rik > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] Namens shad > Verzonden: woensdag 14 december 2016 19:36 > Aan: cctalk > Onderwerp: Re: HP1631D Logic Analyzer..Software??? > > hello, > somewhere around I should have a floppy with disassembler for HP1660 series. > I suppose it is useless for 1630... or not? > Should I give a look to find it? > > Andrea
Re: HP1631D Logic Analyzer..Software???
hello, somewhere around I should have a floppy with disassembler for HP1660 series. I suppose it is useless for 1630... or not? Should I give a look to find it? Andrea
WTB SS-30 FDC
I've been looking for an SS-30 bus floppy controller for some time now. Examples would be DC2/DC3/DC4/DC5, but I would also be OK with a Pertec or SSB. Anyone have one that they would be willing to part with?
Re: ADM-3A Lower case ROM issue
By accident, I just now restored an ADM3 (not the "A")! Lowercase ROM was made with an pin-rearranged 2706 EPROM. Additional RAM was inserted, DIP switches were set: works perfectly. However, with lowercase ROM installed and DIP switches set, but extra RAM missing, the Space "0x20" was displayed as a " ` ". So I think you have an RAM issue. Perhaps cleaning the socketed extra RAM helps? Joerg On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Steve Hatlewrote: I acquired an ADM3-A a while back from the NWA auction, and a generous friend was able to get me the lower case ROM chip that was "missing" from my terminal. I set the DIP switches and installed the ROM. When I turned on the terminal, the whole screen was filled with "`" characters before the host was ever started. When I started up the connected Sun machine, the terminal did display both upper and lower case characters, but the "`" characters remained and appeared to fill out each new line, and text printed out by the machine was followed by garbage characters - like "Login:n". Typed characters were correctly upper or lower as typed. I removed the ROM and cleaned the legs of the chip. I didn't clean the socket, since I didn't have anything like DeOxit handy. I did remove and re-insert the ROM a couple of times. When I removed the ROM and set the DIPs back to the original setting, the terminal worked like normal in all upper case. Setting the DIPs to force upper case, etc. when the ROM was in always showed the bad behavior though the characters were upper/lower as you would expect from the switch settings. TL;DR - bad and extra characters when the ROM chip is in, everything OK when it's out. So, barring a bad connection to the chip while it's in the socket, it seems like the ROM itself could be bad. I'll dig through the maint manuals and see if I can find anything related to this behavior. In the meantime, any ideas from the collective are welcome. Take a look at the silk screen on the board - ISTR there's another chip that needs to be added, some simple TTL logic. I converted mine several years ago without problems - but that was with the original ROM.
RE: ADM-3A Lower case ROM issue
Original Message Subject: Re: ADM-3A Lower case ROM issue From: Jörg_HoppeDate: Wed, December 14, 2016 9:00 am To: cct...@classiccmp.org By accident, I just now restored an ADM3 (not the "A")! Lowercase ROM was made with an pin-rearranged 2706 EPROM. Additional RAM was inserted, DIP switches were set: works perfectly. However, with lowercase ROM installed and DIP switches set, but extra RAM missing, the Space "0x20" was displayed as a " ` ". So I think you have an RAM issue. Perhaps cleaning the socketed extra RAM helps? Joerg Thanks - that sounds like my symptoms exactly. I'll check out the RAM. Steve
Re: ADM-3A Lower case ROM issue
On 12/13/16 5:50 PM, Steve Hatle wrote: > I acquired an ADM3-A a while back from the NWA auction, and a > generous friend was able to get me the lower case ROM chip that > was "missing" from my terminal. > related to this http://juliepalooza.8m.com/sl/adm3a-2.htm has rom dumps I was going to put them on bitsavers (I may still do it today), but there are a few oddities: Extra bits in an unused (nonexistant?) column of the UC ROM Exact inversion of the character order in the LC ROM from the normal GI RO-3-2513/CGR-005 Don't know if this was intentional or not. Maybe they inverted the address going to it? I'll also include the two pages describing the glyphs from the GI databook
Re: Megatek Series 7000 Graphics System?
On 12/14/16 12:56 AM, Holm Tiffe wrote: > As far as I understood, you now have found the AM2901 BitSlices in your > machine? yes > It where intersting to know in which order the boards in your system are > placed. > Unfortunately, the boards were separated from the chassis years ago, and after a couple of days of searching I can't find the chassis. I really hope it didn't get tossed in a purge last summer. I found some bits of code on the net (mgdev.h in the BRL-CAD package) that describe the instruction set, and a couple of people I need to try to try contacting to see if they still have any documentation. There were drivers around for V6 Unix, Purdue, MIT, UPenn and several other places wrote their own packages it seems for it http://www.psych.upenn.edu/~saul/MAN3rev https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/45177/08509887-MIT.pdf https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/45178/09961685-MIT.pdf I have the Purdue library on a DECtape image that I'll need to extract the files from. If you can look at the backplane, can you tell me if it is just bussed straight across? It really seems like there were over the top card connectors for the peripheral bus and just a bus arragement on the backplane. It is a very modular system. In the case of the vector version, a minimum configuration was the unibus interface, processor, memory, and vector generator cards. I think your unit was raster, so there was an intermediate vector to raster converter, and frame buffer that took the display list memory and rasterized it. My unit has additional cards (rotate, light pen, keyboard/peripheral interface cards) This all makes a lot more sense once I was able to find some brochures in the CHM collection yesterday that hadn't been cataloged until recently. Another rathole :-(
Re: Z-80 code question about a loop that depends on the contents of the refresh register
On 14/12/2016 09:19, Ethan Dicks wrote: Hi, All, So far, this loop hangs on all three emulators I've tried - simh's altairz80, simcpm010 for AmigaDOS, and EMUZ80 for Raspberry Pi. I'm guessing none of these environments emulate specific behavior of the Refresh register? Does anyone have any comments or insights about what this is really doing and what the right thing to do for emulators is? I can patch this if that's what's needed, but I'd like to understand it first. Thanks, -ethan Ethan, Have you tried running it on ZEMU? (Windows only unfortunately, but should run under WINE). http://www.z80.info/z80emu.htm#EMU_CPU_W32 I tried single stepping through it just now and it looks like it's doing its job, at least as a possible random number generator. When was this game written? Perhaps it's supposed to lock up on emulators that don't emulate the Z80 completely? Not knowing what the game is, it could be a copy protection routine too. Because R counts the number of instructions executed (modulus 128), if the code was modified, theoretically the R register would be different to what the routine expects, and would lock the machine. I can't find any information on what the MSB is set to when the accumulator is loaded with R, and what the Sign flag is set to. The datasheet says the Sign and Zero flags are changed by the instruction. If either of these flags are set, the routine enters an infinite loop. Alexis.
RE: looking for keytronics keyboard pad replacement kit
Think you're talking about this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Victor-9000-SIRIUS-1-Keyboard-repair-Foam-Pads-for-KeyTronic-Keyboards-/121266887970 I bought a couple to repair TRS-80 keyboards - well worth it in my view - save me lot of hassle. Kevin Parker -Original Message- From: cctech [mailto:cctech-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of william degnan Sent: Monday, 12 December 2016 09:17 To: cctechSubject: looking for keytronics keyboard pad replacement kit There was a seller on ebay who had a set of the pre-made keyboard key pads for sale...anyone here selling these? Yes I could make my own, I have gone through the process, but I'd like to buy a set or two as I have a few keyboards to repair. it's a time consuming process. Thanks in advance. Bill
Re: Odd "endianness" [was Re: RE: Base 64 posts to the list]
Noel Chiappa wrote: > > 9-track tapes on the PDP-10 used one of the following encodings: > > What about 7-track, any idea? I would assume 6 x 6-bit tape frames per > 36-bit word, but that's just a guess. A reasonable guess, and one I'd make too. But I don't know either. Supposedly, many ITS backups were made to 7-track tapes. That became a problem when the old tape drives started to fail, and available new tape drives were only 9-track.
RE: looking for keytronics keyboard pad replacement kit
Ok, to me it looked like they did not. The description implies one should transplant them from wherever to the replacement pads. I will ask the seller. Bill Degnan twitter: billdeg vintagecomputer.net On Dec 14, 2016 5:13 AM, "Kevin Parker"wrote: > These have metallic tops Bill - if you look closely you'll see some shiny > bits - mine came with shiny tops > > > > Kevin Parker > > -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of william > degnan > Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2016 00:48 > To: cctech > Subject: Re: looking for keytronics keyboard pad replacement kit > > Upon closer inspection, these are pads only. I am looking for the pads > with new metallic contacts attached, too. The metallic pads also decay and > need to be replaced. I have been able to re-use some but they're never > 100% good. The surface gets coated with something that causes them to > loose the desired properties and cleaning does not always help. I have a > punch to create my own pads, and I *could* make metallic pads from a space > blanket or similar but I was hoping to find pre-made-ready-to-use > replacement pads instead. I could use 4 sets. > > Bill > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:51 AM, william degnan > wrote: > > > Thanks. I was searching with the wrong terms. > > > > Bill Degnan > > twitter: billdeg > > vintagecomputer.net > > On Dec 12, 2016 1:19 AM, "Peter Cetinski" wrote: > > > >> > >> > On Dec 11, 2016, at 5:17 PM, william degnan > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > There was a seller on ebay who had a set of the pre-made keyboard > >> > key > >> pads > >> > for sale...anyone here selling these? Yes I could make my own, I > >> > have > >> gone > >> > through the process, but I'd like to buy a set or two as I have a > >> > few keyboards to repair. it's a time consuming process. > >> > Thanks in advance. > >> > Bill > >> > >> He’s still out there > >> > >> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Victor-9000-SIRIUS-1-Keyboard-repair > >> -Foam-Pads-for-KeyTronic-Keyboards/121266887970 > > > > > >
RE: looking for keytronics keyboard pad replacement kit
These have metallic tops Bill - if you look closely you'll see some shiny bits - mine came with shiny tops Kevin Parker -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of william degnan Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2016 00:48 To: cctechSubject: Re: looking for keytronics keyboard pad replacement kit Upon closer inspection, these are pads only. I am looking for the pads with new metallic contacts attached, too. The metallic pads also decay and need to be replaced. I have been able to re-use some but they're never 100% good. The surface gets coated with something that causes them to loose the desired properties and cleaning does not always help. I have a punch to create my own pads, and I *could* make metallic pads from a space blanket or similar but I was hoping to find pre-made-ready-to-use replacement pads instead. I could use 4 sets. Bill On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:51 AM, william degnan wrote: > Thanks. I was searching with the wrong terms. > > Bill Degnan > twitter: billdeg > vintagecomputer.net > On Dec 12, 2016 1:19 AM, "Peter Cetinski" wrote: > >> >> > On Dec 11, 2016, at 5:17 PM, william degnan >> wrote: >> > >> > There was a seller on ebay who had a set of the pre-made keyboard >> > key >> pads >> > for sale...anyone here selling these? Yes I could make my own, I >> > have >> gone >> > through the process, but I'd like to buy a set or two as I have a >> > few keyboards to repair. it's a time consuming process. >> > Thanks in advance. >> > Bill >> >> He’s still out there >> >> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Victor-9000-SIRIUS-1-Keyboard-repair >> -Foam-Pads-for-KeyTronic-Keyboards/121266887970 > >
Re: EMACS folly
https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=net.sources/qBRfbEjrGV8/3t35z8XYq8IJ http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/editors/teco/emacs11.tar.Z I finally got around to looking at this before archiving it, and found that the shar file gets checksum errors when I run it with bash. Not sure what the problem is, but the files seemed to be clear (not total garbage). I also tried sh, which I don't think is any different than bash anymore. The script warns not to use csh. Also in the second one Pete put in the phone numbers for both he and the original author. Very thoughtful. :-) I was kind of hoping for a full emac executable, but then again probably wouldn't be room for that on an 11 of a smaller size. thanks Jim jws@jws2:~/cnas/projects/emacs/tmp$ bash raw Extracting README: Extracting bldemacs.tec: bldemacs.tec: Checksum error. Is: 13790, should be: 58310. Extracting emacs.doc: Extracting emacs.src: emacs.src: Checksum error. Is: 57446, should be: 43403. Extracting emacs.txt: Extracting emacs11.tec: emacs11.tec: Checksum error. Is: 32418, should be: 48995. Extracting vaxbld.tec: vaxbld.tec: Checksum error. Is: 34617, should be: 47133. ALL DONE BUNKY!
Re: HP1631D Logic Analyzer..Software???
Glen Slick wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Rik Boswrote: > > > >> I used HPDir to dup the two floppies from a physical 9121D drive into .HPI > >> image > >> files, then verified that the 1630D can access those .HPI image files > >> loaded into > >> HPDrive to emulate a 9121D drive. > >> > >> I can send those two .HPI image files to anyone who wants them. > > > > Glen, > > > > Could you upload them to http://www.ko4bb.com/ > > So the measurement community can access them also? > > > > -Rik > > > > I'll do that later. I should add a readme with some notes about > exactly what the files are and how to use the images before I upload > them. Otherwise most people will have no idea what they are. You know > what to do with an .HPI image file, other people might not. > > > On another note, did HP ever provide tools and documentation for > writing Inverse Assemblers for the 1630 series? For the 1650 / 16500 > series there is the 10391B Inverse Assembler Development Package which > includes documentation, a compiler, and sample code. As far as I can > tell the IA code space on the 1630 series must be limited to a total > of 8KB as that is the total amount of EEPROM storage for saving an IA > configuration on a 1630G. I wonder what sort of tools they used for > writing IA for the 1630. > > -Glen As far as I know I do have an HP IEEE488 ISA Board lying around somewhere, and I'l ltry to look at the stack of old Motherboards if I can find something with a "higher" CPU and ISA Slots to build a Windoze computer that can be connected to the 9121D Drive so that I can restore the images to disks. ... What about those LIF Utils (lifdump, lifimage)from Tony Duell (Tony??)? Can I make disks for the data, maybe by reordering sectors and such? I don't have a computer that natively runs some Linux currently, but installing a Kinux souldn't be a big problem. If I get your permission Glen, I'll upload the images to my pulblically reachable dumpster of old data (www.tiffe.de/Robotron) so that anyone can download them.. Regards, Holm -- Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe, Freiberger Straße 42, 09600 Oberschöna, USt-Id: DE253710583 i...@tsht.de Fax +49 3731 74200 Tel +49 3731 74222 Mobil: 0172 8790 741
Re: Megatek Series 7000 Graphics System?
Al Kossow wrote: > a product spec for the 7000 is up now on bitsavers. > there are two busses, graphics and peripheral. > > > On 12/13/16 9:07 AM, Al Kossow wrote: > > > I think that most of the backplane may just be bussed, with 16 bit adr and > > 32 bit data. > > Thanks Al for all the interesting documentation. I hope I'll have some time left over this weekend and I'll try to cleanup that thing a little bit and sort out wich cards I have. I have the same toughts about that Microcomputer Sandwich, seems to be an complete processor module including the microcode in the bipolar proms. As far as I understood, you now have found the AM2901 BitSlices in your machine? It where intersting to know in which order the boards in your system are placed. Regards, Holm -- Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe, Freiberger Straße 42, 09600 Oberschöna, USt-Id: DE253710583 i...@tsht.de Fax +49 3731 74200 Tel +49 3731 74222 Mobil: 0172 8790 741