Re: WTB: 64K cache SIMM (72-pin)

2018-08-31 Thread Rick Murphy via cctalk

On 8/31/2018 8:35 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:

Trying to restore an Alpha Micro ColdFire-based system, and it's missing
its cache SIMM. It works without it, but it sure would be nice. AM doesn't
have much info on it but it appears to be a 72-pin 64KB SIMM (unknown
speed), same keying as 72-pin RAM SIMMs.

I doubt this is a custom part and ISTR that PCs of around that time used
something similar. If you've got something like this mouldering in your
parts drawer, please advise. Thanks!

I have three devices which if I remember right were cache modules, but 
they all appear to be 80 pin devices.
Slightly longer pins than the typical 72-pin SIMMs, fit into a vertical 
socket on the MB.  Any chance you've got the pin count wrong?

    -Rick




WTB: 64K cache SIMM (72-pin)

2018-08-31 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
Trying to restore an Alpha Micro ColdFire-based system, and it's missing
its cache SIMM. It works without it, but it sure would be nice. AM doesn't
have much info on it but it appears to be a 72-pin 64KB SIMM (unknown
speed), same keying as 72-pin RAM SIMMs.

I doubt this is a custom part and ISTR that PCs of around that time used
something similar. If you've got something like this mouldering in your
parts drawer, please advise. Thanks!

-- 
 personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
-- Heisenberg may have been here. -


RE: Lear Sielger keyboard for parts or repair (shorter link)

2018-08-31 Thread Electronics Plus via cctalk



-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Electronics
Plus via cctalk
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 5:04 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Subject: Lear Sielger keyboard for parts or repair

https://bit.ly/2N8N8Io

Original link too long, I guess!
 

 

Cindy Croxton

Electronics Plus

1613 Water Street

Kerrville, TX 78028

830-370-3239 cell

sa...@elecplus.com

 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Lear Sielger keyboard for parts or repair

2018-08-31 Thread Electronics Plus via cctalk
https://www.elecshopper.com/lear-siegler-adm-11-keyboard-for-parts-or-repair
.html

 

 

Cindy Croxton

Electronics Plus

1613 Water Street

Kerrville, TX 78028

830-370-3239 cell

sa...@elecplus.com

 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread systems_glitch via cctalk
Yeah, Allied Telesyn/Telesis made (and still makes!) really decent hardware
at a midrange price. I often recommend their gigabit and PoE switches for
cost-sensitive projects, especially where management isn't really needed.

Thanks,
Jonathan

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 5:56 PM Cameron Kaiser via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> > Allied Telesis made a "multi port tap" that provided four AUI ports off a
> > single Ethernet tap. I don't know if it was a repeater/hub inside, or
> what.
> > It was much smaller than a DELNI or DEREP.
>
> Pretty sure I know the device you're talking about and I think it was
> a hub internally. I liked it a lot better than the DELNI.
>
> Come to think of it, I liked most of Allied Telesyn's stuff. I still have
> a 10Mbit hub of theirs handling the low speed systems and the 10b2 segment
> going to the HP 9000, and a whole mess of the transceivers which are
> periodically useful on AUI-only systems.
>
> --
>  personal:
> http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
>   Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com *
> ckai...@floodgap.com
> -- #include 
> 
>


Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
> Allied Telesis made a "multi port tap" that provided four AUI ports off a
> single Ethernet tap. I don't know if it was a repeater/hub inside, or what.
> It was much smaller than a DELNI or DEREP.

Pretty sure I know the device you're talking about and I think it was
a hub internally. I liked it a lot better than the DELNI.

Come to think of it, I liked most of Allied Telesyn's stuff. I still have
a 10Mbit hub of theirs handling the low speed systems and the 10b2 segment
going to the HP 9000, and a whole mess of the transceivers which are
periodically useful on AUI-only systems.

-- 
 personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
-- #include  


Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On Aug 31, 2018, at 3:32 PM, systems_glitch  wrote:
> 
> Allied Telesis made a "multi port tap" that provided four AUI ports off a 
> single Ethernet tap. I don't know if it was a repeater/hub inside, or what. 
> It was much smaller than a DELNI or DEREP.

That's not surprising.  The DEC boxes were from the very early days of 10 Mb/s 
Ethernet, when transceivers and repeaters were large complex circuits.  
Remember the DEUNA?  That was two hex Unibus boards, quite full of stuff.

Soon afterwards all that stuff was integrated into an IC or two.  Transceivers 
were a bit more difficult because of the analog design involved, and not 
everyone got it right.  I remember a 10Base2 transceiver chip that would take 
down VAXclusters by sending garbage occasionally.

paul




Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread Ethan via cctalk

Allied Telesis made a "multi port tap" that provided four AUI ports off a
single Ethernet tap. I don't know if it was a repeater/hub inside, or what.
It was much smaller than a DELNI or DEREP.


That totally sounds like the one located in the Cray. My guess is most 
people would hook AUI transceivers but they just run ribbon cables to 4 
boards then I think the 10base2 feeds into a BNC T plugged into it.


- Ethan



Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread Ethan via cctalk

I think I've seen reports of multi AUI port taps.  Correct?


I think my Cray has a 4 port AUI box w/ 1 x 10base2. It has DB15 ribbons 
going to each of the IOSV CPU cards. Allied Telesyn might be the mfgr.



--
: Ethan O'Toole




Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread systems_glitch via cctalk
Allied Telesis made a "multi port tap" that provided four AUI ports off a
single Ethernet tap. I don't know if it was a repeater/hub inside, or what.
It was much smaller than a DELNI or DEREP.

Thanks,
Jonathan

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:33 PM Paul Koning via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

>
>
> > On Aug 31, 2018, at 3:25 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 08/31/2018 01:07 PM, systems_glitch via cctalk wrote:
> >> Yeah, I forget what the original allowed length was for drop cables,
> but I seem to remember it striking me as quite long! A few feet of CAT5 (or
> even better, STP) has a lot of wiggle room :P
> >
> > I think I've seen reports of multi AUI port taps.  Correct?
>
> You may be thinking of the DELNI, a multi AUI hub.  Not a repeater,
> apparently.  DEC also made a repeater in that era, the DEREP -- just two
> ports.  That may be why the DELNI was built, as a way to get more fanout
> without the complexity of a multiport repeater built out of discrete
> electronics.
>
> > Could you have one multi-port tap in a computer lab (of 5 ~ 20 machines)
> and connect them all to the single tap?  Sort of like what is done with
> 10BaseT cables to a hub in the room?
>
> Yes, the DELNI allowed for that, you'd plug in up to 8 NICs and then
> connect the uplink port to a transceiver.
>
> paul
>
>


Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On Aug 31, 2018, at 3:25 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
> On 08/31/2018 01:07 PM, systems_glitch via cctalk wrote:
>> Yeah, I forget what the original allowed length was for drop cables, but I 
>> seem to remember it striking me as quite long! A few feet of CAT5 (or even 
>> better, STP) has a lot of wiggle room :P
> 
> I think I've seen reports of multi AUI port taps.  Correct?

You may be thinking of the DELNI, a multi AUI hub.  Not a repeater, apparently. 
 DEC also made a repeater in that era, the DEREP -- just two ports.  That may 
be why the DELNI was built, as a way to get more fanout without the complexity 
of a multiport repeater built out of discrete electronics.

> Could you have one multi-port tap in a computer lab (of 5 ~ 20 machines) and 
> connect them all to the single tap?  Sort of like what is done with 10BaseT 
> cables to a hub in the room?

Yes, the DELNI allowed for that, you'd plug in up to 8 NICs and then connect 
the uplink port to a transceiver.

paul



Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk

On 08/31/2018 01:07 PM, systems_glitch via cctalk wrote:
Yeah, I forget what the original allowed length was for drop cables, 
but I seem to remember it striking me as quite long! A few feet of CAT5 
(or even better, STP) has a lot of wiggle room :P


I think I've seen reports of multi AUI port taps.  Correct?

Could you have one multi-port tap in a computer lab (of 5 ~ 20 machines) 
and connect them all to the single tap?  Sort of like what is done with 
10BaseT cables to a hub in the room?




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die


Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On Aug 31, 2018, at 3:07 PM, systems_glitch  wrote:
> 
> Yeah, I forget what the original allowed length was for drop cables, but I 
> seem to remember it striking me as quite long! A few feet of CAT5 (or even 
> better, STP) has a lot of wiggle room :P

50 meters, says IEEE 802.3.

paul



Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread systems_glitch via cctalk
Yeah, I forget what the original allowed length was for drop cables, but I
seem to remember it striking me as quite long! A few feet of CAT5 (or even
better, STP) has a lot of wiggle room :P

Thanks,
Jonathan

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:08 PM Paul Koning  wrote:

>
>
> > On Aug 31, 2018, at 2:45 PM, systems_glitch 
> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, you can make up your own AUI cables with less-than-spec wire and
> get away with it no problem, but I was referring to NOS premade AUI cables
> being a limited resource.
> >
> > I've made them with DA15s and CAT5 cable before, and it works for short
> runs.
>
> That figures; the impedance is not quite the same but close enough (78
> ohms vs. 100) and AUI cable is supposed to be shielded.  But there should
> be a fair amount of margin.
>
> paul
>
>
>


Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On Aug 31, 2018, at 2:45 PM, systems_glitch  wrote:
> 
> Yeah, you can make up your own AUI cables with less-than-spec wire and get 
> away with it no problem, but I was referring to NOS premade AUI cables being 
> a limited resource.
> 
> I've made them with DA15s and CAT5 cable before, and it works for short runs.

That figures; the impedance is not quite the same but close enough (78 ohms vs. 
100) and AUI cable is supposed to be shielded.  But there should be a fair 
amount of margin.

paul




Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread systems_glitch via cctalk
Yeah, you can make up your own AUI cables with less-than-spec wire and get
away with it no problem, but I was referring to NOS premade AUI cables
being a limited resource.

I've made them with DA15s and CAT5 cable before, and it works for short
runs.

Thanks,
Jonathan

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:21 PM Paul Koning  wrote:

> I understand 10Base5 cable being limited, though regular 50 ohm coax
> generally works fine if you work around the lack of stripes.
>
> AUI cable, though, that doesn't seem much of a problem.  Straightforward N
> pair twisted pair cable, terminated with DA15 connectors.  The slide locks
> are not quite common but I believe still exist in parts catalogs, and you
> can do without them in any case.
>
> paul
>
> > On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:25 AM, systems_glitch via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> > Honestly? I'm worried about someone reading the list archive and hoarding
> > them all away. It's a limited resource.
> >
> > I'll send you the link off-list.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:18 AM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
> > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/31/2018 08:04 AM, systems_glitch wrote:
> >>> Excellent, glad it made it there quickly and safely!
> >>
> >> Me too.
> >>
> >>> If anyone needs AUI cables, I don't have a bunch on hand, but I can
> pass
> >>> on the seller I buy them from -- 1m cable, $20 shipped in the US.
> >>
> >> Is there any reason not to go ahead and share the information publicly?
> >>
> >> I know that I will eventually need to acquire some AUI cables.
> >>
> >> The kicker is that I had two, exactly what I need and the NICs to
> >> connect them to before a cross country move that I got rid of a LOT of
> >> stuff.  (I keep finding out exactly how much I'm replacing.  :-(  No
> fun.)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Grant. . . .
> >> unix || die
> >>
>
>


Re: Novapalooza in 2 months...

2018-08-31 Thread Alan Frisbie via cctalk

Bruce Ray  wrote:

> Really, the Nova is 50? Yup - so join us in celebrating the personal and
> technical impact of this youngster..

I always found it amusing that Data General's computers were
named after transitory phenomena: Nova, Supernova, Eclipse.

Of course, in the grand scale of things, we all are.  :-(

Alan


Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
I understand 10Base5 cable being limited, though regular 50 ohm coax generally 
works fine if you work around the lack of stripes.

AUI cable, though, that doesn't seem much of a problem.  Straightforward N pair 
twisted pair cable, terminated with DA15 connectors.  The slide locks are not 
quite common but I believe still exist in parts catalogs, and you can do 
without them in any case.

paul

> On Aug 31, 2018, at 11:25 AM, systems_glitch via cctalk 
>  wrote:
> 
> Honestly? I'm worried about someone reading the list archive and hoarding
> them all away. It's a limited resource.
> 
> I'll send you the link off-list.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
> 
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:18 AM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 08/31/2018 08:04 AM, systems_glitch wrote:
>>> Excellent, glad it made it there quickly and safely!
>> 
>> Me too.
>> 
>>> If anyone needs AUI cables, I don't have a bunch on hand, but I can pass
>>> on the seller I buy them from -- 1m cable, $20 shipped in the US.
>> 
>> Is there any reason not to go ahead and share the information publicly?
>> 
>> I know that I will eventually need to acquire some AUI cables.
>> 
>> The kicker is that I had two, exactly what I need and the NICs to
>> connect them to before a cross country move that I got rid of a LOT of
>> stuff.  (I keep finding out exactly how much I'm replacing.  :-(  No fun.)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Grant. . . .
>> unix || die
>> 



Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread systems_glitch via cctalk
Honestly? I'm worried about someone reading the list archive and hoarding
them all away. It's a limited resource.

I'll send you the link off-list.

Thanks,
Jonathan

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:18 AM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On 08/31/2018 08:04 AM, systems_glitch wrote:
> > Excellent, glad it made it there quickly and safely!
>
> Me too.
>
> > If anyone needs AUI cables, I don't have a bunch on hand, but I can pass
> > on the seller I buy them from -- 1m cable, $20 shipped in the US.
>
> Is there any reason not to go ahead and share the information publicly?
>
> I know that I will eventually need to acquire some AUI cables.
>
> The kicker is that I had two, exactly what I need and the NICs to
> connect them to before a cross country move that I got rid of a LOT of
> stuff.  (I keep finding out exactly how much I'm replacing.  :-(  No fun.)
>
>
>
> --
> Grant. . . .
> unix || die
>


Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk

On 08/31/2018 08:04 AM, systems_glitch wrote:

Excellent, glad it made it there quickly and safely!


Me too.

If anyone needs AUI cables, I don't have a bunch on hand, but I can pass 
on the seller I buy them from -- 1m cable, $20 shipped in the US.


Is there any reason not to go ahead and share the information publicly?

I know that I will eventually need to acquire some AUI cables.

The kicker is that I had two, exactly what I need and the NICs to 
connect them to before a cross country move that I got rid of a LOT of 
stuff.  (I keep finding out exactly how much I'm replacing.  :-(  No fun.)




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die


Re: Thicknet/10base5 Test Segment: The Cable is In!

2018-08-31 Thread systems_glitch via cctalk
Excellent, glad it made it there quickly and safely! If anyone needs AUI
cables, I don't have a bunch on hand, but I can pass on the seller I buy
them from -- 1m cable, $20 shipped in the US.

Thanks,
Jonathan

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:14 AM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On 06/25/2018 03:20 PM, systems_glitch via cctalk wrote:
> > Anyone interested in cable can email me directly (please change the
> > subject line, it'll get binned into my cctalk folder otherwise). I can
> > provide any level of "kit" from just the cable to fully ready to go. I
> > do have a very few NOS Cabletron ST-500-01 transceiver/non-intrusive
> > tap kits as well.
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I wanted to take a moment and say "Thank You!" for making it a
> possibility for me to have a functional 10Base5 / Thicknet / Hosepipe
> network segment.
>
> I received mine in the mail today.  :-)
>
> I look forward to picking up a couple of NICs with AUI interfaces and
> the requisite AUI cables to connect to the transceivers that you provided.
>
> If this was eBay I'd say:  5 out of 5 - I would do business with
> Jonathan again.
>
> Thank you again.  :-)
>
>
>
> --
> Grant. . . .
> unix || die
>