Re: List migration

2022-07-11 Thread ED SHARPE via cctalk
20 years... congrats Jay!
Ed#

Sent from the all new AOL app for Android 
 
  On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 6:55 PM, Cameron Kaiser via 
cctalk wrote:   > The new hosting is provided by the 
Chicago Classic Computing group.
> 
> Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!

Thanks, Jay, CCC and Dennis!

-- 
 personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
-- An intellectual is someone whose mind watches itself. -- Albert Camus --

  


Re: List migration

2022-07-11 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 7/11/22 16:25, David Griffith via cctalk wrote:
> 
> My reply is at the bottom.  Please put your reply there too.
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote:
>> Friends,
>>
>> The process of migrating the cctalk and cctech mailing lists to a new
>> host in Chicago is underway.  This evening, I've moved the list mail
>> handling to the new server, and this message will be the first live
>> test.  Assuming this works, you shouldn't have to change anything to
>> post to the list.
>>
>> The green web pages, the old "pipermail" list archives, and web access
>> to archives of new postings from this point still require a little work,
>> which I hope to complete in the next day or two.  I will eventually
>> import the old pipermail archives into the new posting archive, but that
>> may take a little longer.
>>
>> The new hosting is provided by the Chicago Classic Computing group.
>>
>> Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!
> 
> Looks good except for missing an X-BeenThere: header.
> 
Looks good from here!  Thanks much!


Re: List migration

2022-07-11 Thread Lyle Bickley via cctalk
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 01:38:36 -0400
Dennis Boone via cctalk  wrote:

> Friends,
> 
> The process of migrating the cctalk and cctech mailing lists to a new
> host in Chicago is underway.  This evening, I've moved the list mail
> handling to the new server, and this message will be the first live
> test.  Assuming this works, you shouldn't have to change anything to
> post to the list.
> 
> The green web pages, the old "pipermail" list archives, and web access
> to archives of new postings from this point still require a little work,
> which I hope to complete in the next day or two.  I will eventually
> import the old pipermail archives into the new posting archive, but that
> may take a little longer.
> 
> The new hosting is provided by the Chicago Classic Computing group.
> 
> Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!
> 
> /Dennis Boone

Indeed many thanks to Jay!!!

Thanks to Dennis, too, for migrating cctalk and cctech to a new host :)

Cheers,
Lyle
-- 
73   NM6Y
Bickley Consulting West
https://bickleywest.com

"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"


Re: List migration

2022-07-11 Thread David Griffith via cctalk



My reply is at the bottom.  Please put your reply there too.
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote:

Friends,

The process of migrating the cctalk and cctech mailing lists to a new
host in Chicago is underway.  This evening, I've moved the list mail
handling to the new server, and this message will be the first live
test.  Assuming this works, you shouldn't have to change anything to
post to the list.

The green web pages, the old "pipermail" list archives, and web access
to archives of new postings from this point still require a little work,
which I hope to complete in the next day or two.  I will eventually
import the old pipermail archives into the new posting archive, but that
may take a little longer.

The new hosting is provided by the Chicago Classic Computing group.

Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!


Looks good except for missing an X-BeenThere: header.

--
David Griffith
d...@661.org


Re: List migration

2022-07-11 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
> The new hosting is provided by the Chicago Classic Computing group.
> 
> Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!

Thanks, Jay, CCC and Dennis!

-- 
 personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
-- An intellectual is someone whose mind watches itself. -- Albert Camus --



RE: List migration

2022-07-11 Thread Smith, Wayne via cctalk
Many thanks, Jay!  -W

Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 01:38:36 -0400
From: Dennis Boone 
Subject: List migration
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org, cct...@classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <20220711053836.b91b93fb...@yagi.h-net.msu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Friends,

The process of migrating the cctalk and cctech mailing lists to a new host in 
Chicago is underway.  This evening, I've moved the list mail handling to the 
new server, and this message will be the first live test.  Assuming this works, 
you shouldn't have to change anything to post to the list.

The green web pages, the old "pipermail" list archives, and web access to 
archives of new postings from this point still require a little work, which I 
hope to complete in the next day or two.  I will eventually import the old 
pipermail archives into the new posting archive, but that may take a little 
longer.

The new hosting is provided by the Chicago Classic Computing group.

Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!

/Dennis Boone

--




LaserMaster LX-6 Controller

2022-07-11 Thread Ali via cctalk
Long shot but

I have in my possession a LaserMaster LX-6 controller. The controller allows 
achieving much higher res from a HP LJII then one would normally be able to 
(600x300 DPI vs. the standard 300x300 DPI). 

If you are really interested can read more about it here:

https://books.google.com/books?id=2jkWJsu_9CoC=RA1-PA46=HrKHEtLGTu=%22lasermaster%22%20driver=RA1-PA46#v=onepage=true

I have all the requisite HW but I am lacking the manual and more importantly 
the driver SW. I was able to locate multiple copies of the LM website on The 
Wayback Machine. Unfortunately, while some of the smaller files have been 
archived all the main EXE and ZIP files are missing. For example see:

http://web.archive.org/web/2301145615/http://www.colorspan.com/support/software/software.htm

I am wondering if anyone has any drivers for this card. A manual would be most 
excellent as well but drivers are more necessary. Thanks.

-Ali




RE: Information on Trend UTR 700 Paper Tape Reader and Facit 4060 Punch

2022-07-11 Thread Martin Bishop via cctalk
The Facit 4060 appears to be from the 1968 - 1969 period

The Trend UTR 700 from ~1980, based on IC date codes

Martin

-Original Message-
From: ED SHARPE via cctalk [mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org] 
Sent: 11 July 2022 08:02
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
Cc: ED SHARPE 
Subject: Re: Information on Trend UTR 700 Paper Tape Reader and Facit 4060 Punch

SOMEWHERE I  HAVE  THIS AMAZING FACIT  PUNCH AN READER CATALOG  BOOK THING,,,  
TONS OF  UNITS BEAUTY PHOTOS    WHAT IS THE DATE ON THE UNITS  YOU SEEK 
INFO ON??
THANKS ED#
In a message dated 7/10/2022 11:32:29 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: Google turns up very little specific information 
on either of these devices, e.g. nil return from bit savers. The best leads I 
have are:- The UTR 700 was badge engineered by Ferranti into FM1600B systems, 
one of which fetched up at the Centre for Computer History, Cambridge, England; 
perhaps with documentation.  Also, as it was used in government systems some 
maintenance documentation may have fetched up in the PRO, at Kew.- Some Facit 
4060 documentation, for the 4060, its 4061 & 4063 chums and the 5106 interface, 
look to be lodged in Box 52 of the ICL Collection at the Science Museum 
Library. The UTR 700 reader looks to be parallel interfaced, 10 single ended 
outputs from an interface card.  The jokes start with manufacturer codes, 
rather than OEM part numbers on the 14 pin DIL ICs.  However, a little scope 
work should identify tape out, data 0..7 and strobe lines.  More interesting 
questions are lubrication and capacitor replacement - where a schematic would 
be a great assistance in deciding how to proceed.  etc etc The Facit 4060 punch 
contains no more than the electro-mechanical mechanism : AC drive motor, 
solenoids and rotary position sensors.  The 4070 documentation (on BitSavers) 
may read across, in terms of sensor characteristics, solenoid operating 
voltages and snubbing needs, or it may not.  That reconstructing the schematic 
would be straightforward simply identifies how much is missing, and the 
difficulty of specifying it in the abscence of documentation.  A classic tape 
punch interface from data latch and ready, through position sensing, solenoid 
drivers and done logic is required, together with auxiliary indications, e.g. 
tape out.  etc etc Any information, wisdom, documentation or pointers to 
sources would be very much appreciated. To state the obvious, I was passed 
these devices by Philip Belben Martin


RE: Information on Trend UTR 700 Paper Tape Reader and Facit 4060 Punch

2022-07-11 Thread Martin Bishop via cctalk
Errata : Trend UDR 700, not UTR

-Original Message-
From: Martin Bishop via cctalk [mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org] 
Sent: 11 July 2022 00:25
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts (cctalk@classiccmp.org) 

Cc: Martin Bishop 
Subject: Information on Trend UTR 700 Paper Tape Reader and Facit 4060 Punch

Google turns up very little specific information on either of these devices, 
e.g. nil return from bit savers.

The best leads I have are:
- The UTR 700 was badge engineered by Ferranti into FM1600B systems, one of 
which fetched up at the Centre for Computer History, Cambridge, England; 
perhaps with documentation.  Also, as it was used in government systems some 
maintenance documentation may have fetched up in the PRO, at Kew.
- Some Facit 4060 documentation, for the 4060, its 4061 & 4063 chums and the 
5106 interface, look to be lodged in Box 52 of the ICL Collection at the 
Science Museum Library.

The UTR 700 reader looks to be parallel interfaced, 10 single ended outputs 
from an interface card.  The jokes start with manufacturer codes, rather than 
OEM part numbers on the 14 pin DIL ICs.  However, a little scope work should 
identify tape out, data 0..7 and strobe lines.  More interesting questions are 
lubrication and capacitor replacement - where a schematic would be a great 
assistance in deciding how to proceed.  etc etc

The Facit 4060 punch contains no more than the electro-mechanical mechanism : 
AC drive motor, solenoids and rotary position sensors.  The 4070 documentation 
(on BitSavers) may read across, in terms of sensor characteristics, solenoid 
operating voltages and snubbing needs, or it may not.  That reconstructing the 
schematic would be straightforward simply identifies how much is missing, and 
the difficulty of specifying it in the abscence of documentation.  A classic 
tape punch interface from data latch and ready, through position sensing, 
solenoid drivers and done logic is required, together with auxiliary 
indications, e.g. tape out.  etc etc

Any information, wisdom, documentation or pointers to sources would be very 
much appreciated.

To state the obvious, I was passed these devices by Philip Belben

Martin


Re: Vintage Computing Hosting [Was: List migration]

2022-07-11 Thread Ethan O'Toole via cctalk

Who else provides free vintage computer-themed web site hosting as a group
service?  I know neurotica.com (LSSM) does too, and I realize a lot of
people have home servers that host their web sites on the subject, still,
right?


My shell host of friends is at a tier 1 colocation facility. 1.5ms to 
google, half a ms to aws and azure. Just spun up VMs for running a BBS for 
MAGFest and trying to figure out analog modem inbound for it. If someone 
needed to host a project for the community I could help, same goes with 
mirrors.


My costs are fixed and the box is prety beefy (thanks to friends.) Shell 
host is probably 30 years at this point.



--
: Ethan O'Toole




Re: Vintage Computing Hosting [Was: List migration]

2022-07-11 Thread Jonathan Chapman via cctalk
We do hosting for a few other hobbyists, and Andy Meyer has his Sony SMC-70 
pages on users.glitchwrks.com subdomain:

http://users.glitchwrks.com/~ahm/smc70/

Not really advertised as a service, just one of those things where a few 
friends have needed a place to host a few things!

Thanks,
Jonathan




--- Original Message ---
On Monday, July 11th, 2022 at 09:50, Bill Degnan via cctalk 
 wrote:


>
>
> >
>
> > > The new hosting is provided by the Chicago Classic Computing group.
> > >
> > > Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!
>
> Who else provides free vintage computer-themed web site hosting as a group
> service? I know neurotica.com (LSSM) does too, and I realize a lot of
> people have home servers that host their web sites on the subject, still,
> right?
>
> All of my servers are on AWS at this point, although I still have a large
> rack at home with dormant / test servers with aging OS's. Red Hat 6
> anyone?...
>
> I have the space to host a mirror or two, should there be a need. My
> company hosts a mirror for
> https://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/comp/
> on
> https://www.vintagecomputer.net/fjkraan/
>
> Bill


Re: Xerox 800 Word Processor 1974 promo film

2022-07-11 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 at 10:10, Christian Corti via cctalk
 wrote:

> Actually I knew them only as Rank Xerox many years ago, when they were
> commonly known as office suppliers, e.g. photo copiers and printers.

Ditto.

I think this may be another of those US/rest-of-world things.

To this Brit, the only company I knew of with this name was "Rank
Xerox" and  I had never heard of "Xerox" as a company (nor as a verb)
until I was an adult working in the tech industry and learned of Xerox
PARC and its role in the development of Smalltalk, OOPS, the GUI etc.

So probably roughly in my late 20s or early 30s.

"To xerox" meaning "to make a photocopy" was something I learned
around the same time. This is not a verb in British English, nor I
think in any non-North-American dialects of English.


-- 
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lpro...@gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
UK: (+44) 7939-087884 ~ Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053


Vintage Computing Hosting [Was: List migration]

2022-07-11 Thread Bill Degnan via cctalk
>
> >
> > The new hosting is provided by the Chicago Classic Computing group.
> >
> > Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!
> >
>
>
Who else provides free vintage computer-themed web site hosting as a group
service?  I know neurotica.com (LSSM) does too, and I realize a lot of
people have home servers that host their web sites on the subject, still,
right?

All of my servers are on AWS at this point, although I still have a large
rack at home with dormant / test servers with aging OS's.  Red Hat 6
anyone?...

I have the space to host a mirror or two, should there be a need.  My
company hosts a mirror for
https://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/comp/
on
https://www.vintagecomputer.net/fjkraan/

Bill


Re: Xerox 800 Word Processor 1974 promo film

2022-07-11 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On Jul 10, 2022, at 5:06 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
> On 7/10/22 13:41, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 10, 2022, at 4:10 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sat, 2 Jul 2022, Grant Taylor wrote:
 I don't know that I've ever heard / seen the name "Rank" prefixing "Xerox" 
 before.
>>> 
>>> Actually I knew them only as Rank Xerox many years ago, when they were 
>>> commonly known as office suppliers, e.g. photo copiers and printers.
>> 
>> Is the "Rank" prefix part of the company name in Europe?  
> 
> For a time, it was even present in Japan.
> 
> The Rank Organisation.  Surely you've seen some old British Pinewood
> Studios films with J. Arthur Rank's big gong as an intro?

It's vaguely familiar.

Another part of the Rank organization, at one time, was precision measurement 
company Taylor-Hobson.  I remember several of their their instruments in the 
metrology lab at U. Eindhoven.

paul



Re: List migration

2022-07-11 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
Looks good!

And many thanks to Jay West and to the CCCG.

paul

> On Jul 11, 2022, at 1:38 AM, Dennis Boone via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
> Friends,
> 
> The process of migrating the cctalk and cctech mailing lists to a new
> host in Chicago is underway.  This evening, I've moved the list mail
> handling to the new server, and this message will be the first live
> test.  Assuming this works, you shouldn't have to change anything to
> post to the list.
> 
> The green web pages, the old "pipermail" list archives, and web access
> to archives of new postings from this point still require a little work,
> which I hope to complete in the next day or two.  I will eventually
> import the old pipermail archives into the new posting archive, but that
> may take a little longer.
> 
> The new hosting is provided by the Chicago Classic Computing group.
> 
> Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!
> 
> /Dennis Boone



Re: Information on Trend UTR 700 Paper Tape Reader and Facit 4060 Punch

2022-07-11 Thread ED SHARPE via cctalk
THAT  IS  NEAR  RAGE  OF  DATES  I   THINK OF NOOK  NO PROMISES BUT  WILL SEE 
IF  I CAN FOND  WHERE I STASHED  THE BOOK!
 ED#
In a message dated 7/11/2022 12:42:03 AM US Mountain Standard Time, 
mjd.bis...@emeritus-solutions.com writes: 
The Facit 4060 appears to be from the 1968 - 1969 period

The Trend UTR 700 from ~1980, based on IC date codes

Martin

-Original Message-
From: ED SHARPE via cctalk [mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org] 
Sent: 11 July 2022 08:02
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
Cc: ED SHARPE 
Subject: Re: Information on Trend UTR 700 Paper Tape Reader and Facit 4060 Punch

SOMEWHERE I  HAVE  THIS AMAZING FACIT  PUNCH AN READER CATALOG  BOOK THING,,,  
TONS OF  UNITS BEAUTY PHOTOS    WHAT IS THE DATE ON THE UNITS  YOU SEEK 
INFO ON??
THANKS ED#
In a message dated 7/10/2022 11:32:29 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: Google turns up very little specific information 
on either of these devices, e.g. nil return from bit savers. The best leads I 
have are:- The UTR 700 was badge engineered by Ferranti into FM1600B systems, 
one of which fetched up at the Centre for Computer History, Cambridge, England; 
perhaps with documentation.  Also, as it was used in government systems some 
maintenance documentation may have fetched up in the PRO, at Kew.- Some Facit 
4060 documentation, for the 4060, its 4061 & 4063 chums and the 5106 interface, 
look to be lodged in Box 52 of the ICL Collection at the Science Museum 
Library. The UTR 700 reader looks to be parallel interfaced, 10 single ended 
outputs from an interface card.  The jokes start with manufacturer codes, 
rather than OEM part numbers on the 14 pin DIL ICs.  However, a little scope 
work should identify tape out, data 0..7 and strobe lines.  More interesting 
questions are lubrication and capacitor replacement - where a schematic would 
be a great assistance in deciding how to proceed.  etc etc The Facit 4060 punch 
contains no more than the electro-mechanical mechanism : AC drive motor, 
solenoids and rotary position sensors.  The 4070 documentation (on BitSavers) 
may read across, in terms of sensor characteristics, solenoid operating 
voltages and snubbing needs, or it may not.  That reconstructing the schematic 
would be straightforward simply identifies how much is missing, and the 
difficulty of specifying it in the abscence of documentation.  A classic tape 
punch interface from data latch and ready, through position sensing, solenoid 
drivers and done logic is required, together with auxiliary indications, e.g. 
tape out.  etc etc Any information, wisdom, documentation or pointers to 
sources would be very much appreciated. To state the obvious, I was passed 
these devices by Philip Belben Martin


Re: Information on Trend UTR 700 Paper Tape Reader and Facit 4060 Punch

2022-07-11 Thread ED SHARPE via cctalk
https://gesrepair.com/products/4070-facit-tape-punch/
YIKES   EXPENSIVE TO FIX
In a message dated 7/10/2022 11:32:29 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: 
UTR 700


Re: Information on Trend UTR 700 Paper Tape Reader and Facit 4060 Punch

2022-07-11 Thread ED SHARPE via cctalk
SOMEWHERE I  HAVE  THIS AMAZING FACIT  PUNCH AN READER CATALOG  BOOK THING,,,  
TONS OF  UNITS BEAUTY PHOTOS    WHAT IS THE DATE ON THE UNITS  YOU SEEK 
INFO ON??
THANKS ED#
In a message dated 7/10/2022 11:32:29 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: 
Google turns up very little specific information on either of these devices, 
e.g. nil return from bit savers. The best leads I have are:- The UTR 700 was 
badge engineered by Ferranti into FM1600B systems, one of which fetched up at 
the Centre for Computer History, Cambridge, England; perhaps with 
documentation.  Also, as it was used in government systems some maintenance 
documentation may have fetched up in the PRO, at Kew.- Some Facit 4060 
documentation, for the 4060, its 4061 & 4063 chums and the 5106 interface, look 
to be lodged in Box 52 of the ICL Collection at the Science Museum Library. The 
UTR 700 reader looks to be parallel interfaced, 10 single ended outputs from an 
interface card.  The jokes start with manufacturer codes, rather than OEM part 
numbers on the 14 pin DIL ICs.  However, a little scope work should identify 
tape out, data 0..7 and strobe lines.  More interesting questions are 
lubrication and capacitor replacement - where a schematic would be a great 
assistance in deciding how to proceed.  etc etc The Facit 4060 punch contains 
no more than the electro-mechanical mechanism : AC drive motor, solenoids and 
rotary position sensors.  The 4070 documentation (on BitSavers) may read 
across, in terms of sensor characteristics, solenoid operating voltages and 
snubbing needs, or it may not.  That reconstructing the schematic would be 
straightforward simply identifies how much is missing, and the difficulty of 
specifying it in the abscence of documentation.  A classic tape punch interface 
from data latch and ready, through position sensing, solenoid drivers and done 
logic is required, together with auxiliary indications, e.g. tape out.  etc etc 
Any information, wisdom, documentation or pointers to sources would be very 
much appreciated. To state the obvious, I was passed these devices by Philip 
Belben Martin


Information on Trend UTR 700 Paper Tape Reader and Facit 4060 Punch

2022-07-11 Thread Martin Bishop via cctalk
Google turns up very little specific information on either of these devices, 
e.g. nil return from bit savers.

The best leads I have are:
- The UTR 700 was badge engineered by Ferranti into FM1600B systems, one of 
which fetched up at the Centre for Computer History, Cambridge, England; 
perhaps with documentation.  Also, as it was used in government systems some 
maintenance documentation may have fetched up in the PRO, at Kew.
- Some Facit 4060 documentation, for the 4060, its 4061 & 4063 chums and the 
5106 interface, look to be lodged in Box 52 of the ICL Collection at the 
Science Museum Library.

The UTR 700 reader looks to be parallel interfaced, 10 single ended outputs 
from an interface card.  The jokes start with manufacturer codes, rather than 
OEM part numbers on the 14 pin DIL ICs.  However, a little scope work should 
identify tape out, data 0..7 and strobe lines.  More interesting questions are 
lubrication and capacitor replacement - where a schematic would be a great 
assistance in deciding how to proceed.  etc etc

The Facit 4060 punch contains no more than the electro-mechanical mechanism : 
AC drive motor, solenoids and rotary position sensors.  The 4070 documentation 
(on BitSavers) may read across, in terms of sensor characteristics, solenoid 
operating voltages and snubbing needs, or it may not.  That reconstructing the 
schematic would be straightforward simply identifies how much is missing, and 
the difficulty of specifying it in the abscence of documentation.  A classic 
tape punch interface from data latch and ready, through position sensing, 
solenoid drivers and done logic is required, together with auxiliary 
indications, e.g. tape out.  etc etc

Any information, wisdom, documentation or pointers to sources would be very 
much appreciated.

To state the obvious, I was passed these devices by Philip Belben

Martin


List migration

2022-07-11 Thread Dennis Boone via cctalk
Friends,

The process of migrating the cctalk and cctech mailing lists to a new
host in Chicago is underway.  This evening, I've moved the list mail
handling to the new server, and this message will be the first live
test.  Assuming this works, you shouldn't have to change anything to
post to the list.

The green web pages, the old "pipermail" list archives, and web access
to archives of new postings from this point still require a little work,
which I hope to complete in the next day or two.  I will eventually
import the old pipermail archives into the new posting archive, but that
may take a little longer.

The new hosting is provided by the Chicago Classic Computing group.

Many thanks to Jay West for hosting the lists for 20 years!

/Dennis Boone