[cctalk] Re: Odd IBM mass storage systems

2024-04-18 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 4/18/24 14:01, paul.kimpel--- via cctalk wrote:
> The tape for the Burroughs 220 drives was not metallic. It was 3/4-inch wide, 
> and I think a Mylar sandwich. It could be spliced much the same way you would 
> have spliced quarter-inch reel-to-reel audio tape back in the day.
> 
The Datamatic 1000 tapes were definitely a Mylar sandwich affair.  3"
wide and 2700' long.

https://www.smecc.org/honeywell_datamatic_1000.htm

A few reels of the stuff are still around.

--Chuck




[cctalk] Re: Apple II

2024-04-18 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
Bill, so the disk drives are gone?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 18, 2024, at 14:36, Bill Degnan via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
> Not sure if you mean me, "Bill", but I sold or gave away all of the Apple's
> that I had for sale, about 15 or so all gone.
> 
> I did not have any original II's for sale.  Only surplus II+, IIe, IIc,
> original MACs (mac plus, SE, classic, SE FD and that style.
> 
> This was all a fundraiser for kennett Classic non profit.
> 
> What's left is here
> Kennettclassic.com/surplus/
> 
> Bill
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024, 4:56 PM Adam Thornton via cctalk <
>> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Mostly to Bill, but also anyone else hanging out here who's got a surfeit
>> of 8-bit Apple stuff:
>> 
>> If you're planning on selling the Apple II, and it's not a ][+, I'd be
>> interested in buying.  Not, perhaps, at optimistic eBay prices, but I have
>> a lot of ][+s and //es, most of them in working shape, some of which are
>> parts machines; however, I don't have either a II or a //c .
>> 
>> Also happy to trade if I've got things you want.  I don't have anything
>> super-exotic, but feel free to HMU and ask.
>> 
>> Adam
>> 


[cctalk] Re: Apple II

2024-04-18 Thread Bill Degnan via cctalk
Not sure if you mean me, "Bill", but I sold or gave away all of the Apple's
that I had for sale, about 15 or so all gone.

I did not have any original II's for sale.  Only surplus II+, IIe, IIc,
original MACs (mac plus, SE, classic, SE FD and that style.

This was all a fundraiser for kennett Classic non profit.

What's left is here
Kennettclassic.com/surplus/

Bill

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024, 4:56 PM Adam Thornton via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> Mostly to Bill, but also anyone else hanging out here who's got a surfeit
> of 8-bit Apple stuff:
>
> If you're planning on selling the Apple II, and it's not a ][+, I'd be
> interested in buying.  Not, perhaps, at optimistic eBay prices, but I have
> a lot of ][+s and //es, most of them in working shape, some of which are
> parts machines; however, I don't have either a II or a //c .
>
> Also happy to trade if I've got things you want.  I don't have anything
> super-exotic, but feel free to HMU and ask.
>
> Adam
>


[cctalk] Re: Odd IBM mass storage systems

2024-04-18 Thread paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
The main storage area of the ElectroData/Burroughs Datatron 205 was 20 tracks 
of 200 words each for a total of 4000 words. The drum rotated at 3570 RPM, so 
the average access time was about 8.4ms.

The four quick-access tracks (or "loops" as they were called) were 20 words 
each and worked as a delay line, much like the Bendix G-15's drum. These tracks 
had separate read and write heads. When writing was not taking place, the 
digits from the read head were simply copied to the write head  36 degrees 
behind on the surface of the drum. So as the last digit of the track was 
written, the first digit of the track was coming under the read head, yielding 
an average access time of 0.84ms.

When writing, digits from the processor were shunted to the write head in lieu 
of those coming from the read head. When power was removed from the system, the 
4000-word main memory was preserved, but the data in the high-speed bands was 
lost.

The 205 had instructions to transfer 20-word blocks between the main memory and 
the high-speed tracks. There were even a couple of instructions to move a block 
to one of the high-speed tracks and branch to a word in that high-speed track. 
The high-speed tracks were addressed modulo 20 (i.e., word 4005 was the same as 
4025, 4045, 4065, ... 4985). You had to get good at dealing with addresses that 
were congruent modulo 20.

The high-speed tracks were so much faster than main storage that most 
programmers went to a lot of effort to "block" 20-word segments of the program 
to the high-speed tracks and execute at least the most active code from the 
faster storage.


[cctalk] Re: Odd IBM mass storage systems

2024-04-18 Thread paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
The tape for the Burroughs 220 drives was not metallic. It was 3/4-inch wide, 
and I think a Mylar sandwich. It could be spliced much the same way you would 
have spliced quarter-inch reel-to-reel audio tape back in the day.

If the tape controller detected a parity error, it would backspace the block 
and retry twice. If the error persisted on the second retry, the tape would 
stop with the head ready to read the bad block (hanging the processor in the 
middle of its I/O instruction), and the operator would have to take manual 
action. If the drive punched a hole in the tape, then the drive needed service 
-- probably a bad capstan pinch-roller solenoid.


[cctalk] Apple II

2024-04-18 Thread Adam Thornton via cctalk
Mostly to Bill, but also anyone else hanging out here who's got a surfeit
of 8-bit Apple stuff:

If you're planning on selling the Apple II, and it's not a ][+, I'd be
interested in buying.  Not, perhaps, at optimistic eBay prices, but I have
a lot of ][+s and //es, most of them in working shape, some of which are
parts machines; however, I don't have either a II or a //c .

Also happy to trade if I've got things you want.  I don't have anything
super-exotic, but feel free to HMU and ask.

Adam