[cctalk] Re: DOS p-System Pascal: (Was: Saga of CP/M)

2024-05-10 Thread Stuff Received via cctalk

On 2024-05-09 09:46, Warner Losh via cctalk wrote:

On Thu, May 9, 2024, 5:39 AM Bill Degnan via cctalk 
wrote:


Without doing the research before asking, there was the UCSD p-System
Pascal for IBM PC which came out very early in the history of the IBM PC.
It was not very popular.  The SAGE II that had native Pascal (68000) was
not a popular machine.  Waterloo Pascal on the SuperPetPascal never
really made it on the microcomputer platform did it?



Not until TurboPascal... But it was only a few years until C emerged from
the language "street fight" as top dog... depending on what the universe of
microcomputers we're talking about.


I recall that MS sold a Pascal compiler, possibly from someone else.  It 
was very slow and buggy.  I heard a story that to speed up disc access, 
MS put FAT-manipulation code in the actual compiler and that 
occasionally destroyed the FAT.


S.


[cctalk] Re: Did something happen to comp.os.vms ?

2024-03-09 Thread Stuff Received via cctalk

On 2024-03-09 14:50, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:

Did something happen to comp.os.vms and/or usenet?  All the DEC newsgroups 
appear to be missing from Eternal September.

Zane




I just subscribed to comp.os.vms on Eternal-September without issue. 
All seems well.


S.


[cctalk] Re: Store with "vintage" computers and parts

2023-02-09 Thread Stuff Received via cctalk

On 2023-02-09 09:31, Eric Moore via cctalk wrote:

There are some older folks on the list, so this is a good time to talk
about internet safety.


Having spent over 30y in cybersecurity, I suppose that I qualify. #6-)

I am sure that this was not meant as a condescending insult but perhaps 
a different choice of words would have preferable.


N.


[cctalk] Re: Great Vintage Computer Heist of 2012

2022-10-19 Thread Stuff Received via cctalk

On 2022-10-19 10:06, Raphaël Jacquot via cctalk wrote:


Le 19/10/2022 à 15:50, Alexander Schreiber via cctalk a écrit :


Florida seems to be particularly creative, too: pay your contractor,
contractor doesn't pay their supplier, supplier puts lien on _your_
house for the money owed. Want to keep your house? Better pay again
and then try to extract that money from the contractor later by
way of the courts.


this whole paragraph sounds utterly illegal...


No -- perfectly legal in many jurisdictions in both the US and Canada.  
In fact, you need not even be told of the lien.


Reputable contractors will give you (or you should demand) a release 
from liens.


N.


[cctalk] Re: Apple G5 Rebuild

2022-10-10 Thread Stuff Received via cctalk

On 2022-10-10 17:39, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:

On 10/10/22 10:33 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:

4 words is not "Google-fu".


Sometimes knowing /which/ /words/ to search for is the problem.


Indeed.  Also, I have added more words and received more search 
results.  One would expect the opposite.


I've also seen Google return extremely different search results for 
different people.


Google also tailors results to location and cookies.  (I always search 
in private mode.)  Not what it once was...(Sigh)


N.