Re: HP 54200D oscope practically worthless?

2022-05-12 Thread Glen Slick via cctalk
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 5:55 PM Eric Smith via cctalk
 wrote:
>
> These appear to be derived from the 1630/1631 logic analyzers, some models
> of which have 'scope capability, which works as you've described. They must
> have decided to offer models with only the scope and without the logic
> analzyer (except for a digital triggering option), which seems like a bad
> idea. Probably why I'd never heard of these before.
>

Without taking a close look at the specifications for any differences,
the scope capability of the 54200 might be basically the same as the
1631.

The 54201 scope adds a repetitive sampling capability that doesn't
appear to be present on the 54200 and 1631, which increases the
bandwidth up to 300MHz instead of 50MHz in the real-time sampling
mode.


Re: HP 54200D oscope practically worthless?

2022-05-12 Thread Eric Smith via cctalk
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:25 PM Alexander Huemer via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 02:01:50PM -0400, William Sudbrink via cctalk
> wrote:
> > I picked up one of these in a batch of electronics.  Is it worth
> > repairing/investigating?
>
> The scope does what it is supposed to, you get a time-domain
> visualization of voltage.
> Though, they are awkward to use due to the lack of rotary encoders.
> Scaling horizontally or vertically requires you to go into a menu,
> navigate to the right option, do the actual scaling and go back.
> It's better than no scope at all, but not exactly the model you'd hunt.
>

These appear to be derived from the 1630/1631 logic analyzers, some models
of which have 'scope capability, which works as you've described. They must
have decided to offer models with only the scope and without the logic
analzyer (except for a digital triggering option), which seems like a bad
idea. Probably why I'd never heard of these before.

At the time they were current (early 1980s), the 1630/1631 family were
fairly reasonable logic analyzers, but the 1650/16500, 1660, 1670/16700,
etc. are far better. I wouldn't recommend that anyone _buy_ a 1630/1631
family logic analyzer at this late date, but if someone is giving one
away...


Re: HP 54200D oscope practically worthless?

2022-05-12 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk

On 5/12/22 13:01, William Sudbrink via cctalk wrote:

I picked up one of these in a batch of electronics.  Is it worth
repairing/investigating?
I don't see much on the web and they seem to go for practically nothing on
epay.
Is there something inherently wrong with them?


I have a 54200A that I got out of a dumpster.  The user 
interface is QUITE awful compared to modern digital scopes.  
Setting the trigger level requires going through several 
menus, for instance.


But, it is a decent scope except for the human-machine 
interface.


Jon



RE: HP 54200D oscope practically worthless?

2022-05-12 Thread William Sudbrink via cctalk
Alexander Huemer wrote:

> The scope does what it is supposed to, you get a
> time-domain visualization of voltage.  Though, they
> are awkward to use due to the lack of rotary encoders.  
> Scaling horizontally or vertically requires you to go into
> a menu, navigate to the right option, do the actual
> scaling and go back.
> It's better than no scope at all

Yea, I have several other scopes, so I guess I won't
spend any time on it...

> but not exactly the model you'd hunt.

Anybody in the Washington, DC area want to pick it up
for a beer?

-Alex


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Re: HP 54200D oscope practically worthless?

2022-05-12 Thread Dennis Boone via cctalk
 > The scope does what it is supposed to, you get a time-domain
 > visualization of voltage.  Though, they are awkward to use due to the
 > lack of rotary encoders.  Scaling horizontally or vertically requires
 > you to go into a menu, navigate to the right option, do the actual
 > scaling and go back.  It's better than no scope at all, but not
 > exactly the model you'd hunt.

It has HP-IB, and the manuals mention the HP desktop computers of that
era, so you could probably build a more facile interface on a modern
machine.

De


Re: HP 54200D oscope practically worthless?

2022-05-12 Thread Alexander Huemer via cctalk
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 02:01:50PM -0400, William Sudbrink via cctalk wrote:
> I picked up one of these in a batch of electronics.  Is it worth
> repairing/investigating?
> I don't see much on the web and they seem to go for practically nothing on
> epay.
> Is there something inherently wrong with them?

The scope does what it is supposed to, you get a time-domain 
visualization of voltage.
Though, they are awkward to use due to the lack of rotary encoders.  
Scaling horizontally or vertically requires you to go into a menu, 
navigate to the right option, do the actual scaling and go back.
It's better than no scope at all, but not exactly the model you'd hunt.

-Alex


HP 54200D oscope practically worthless?

2022-05-12 Thread William Sudbrink via cctalk
I picked up one of these in a batch of electronics.  Is it worth
repairing/investigating?
I don't see much on the web and they seem to go for practically nothing on
epay.
Is there something inherently wrong with them?

Thanks,
Bill S.


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus